I don't know about the USB drive issue ... my external drives are
connected with FireWire and Lightroom can import a folder of data
from them without any problems. I imported the two 70Gbyte
directories of photos -- 2003 and 2002 -- from my archive drive,
handled it without a hitch.
You're missing something.
Import gives you the choice of working on files from an existing
location, or of using them in Lightroom's own internal database. I
don't see much advantage to the latter. But once you've imported your
files it's not fundamentally any different from using any other File
Dammit Paul, you derailed my train of thought!
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Forgot the important part:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5628202size=lg
My missing URL:
http://www.mindspring.com/~morephotos/PESO_--_milldam.html
P. J. Alling wrote:
One more BW conversion.
An abandoned
That's a plane tree, I think. They make very nice shapes against the
sky in winter.
--
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Godfrey DiGiorgi
Sent: 22 February 2007 06:15
To: DUG; PDML List; PAW; SeePhoto Talk
Subject: PAW 2007 -
coughtlink?/cought
Cheers,
Dave
At 02:02 PM 22/02/2007, P. J. Alling wrote:
One more BW conversion.
An abandoned water mill dam on a tributary to the Connecticut river.
Equipment: Pentax *ist-Ds/smc Pentax FA 20-35mm f4.0 [AL].
As usual comments are welcome but may be totally ignored.
--
Thanks mate. Your reply put it into a bit of perspective. I have found
that I can import my folder manually, I'm not sure what the point of auto
importing is as it won't do that from external drives.
I'll play a bit more with it, but I'm pretty happy with my current work
flow...especially as
Good God! Don't point those things at Boris, he'll go into orbit.
--
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Paul Stenquist
Sent: 22 February 2007 04:47
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: PESO: Body Beautiful Boot Camp Company
I dont agree that a M42 DSLR based on licensed existing DSLR body
and just modified to do M42 auto apeture would be very
expensive to develop or produce. And it certainly
would be nothing like the cost of a one-off exotic lens if thats
what your trying to say.
jco
-Original Message-
From:
From: Cory Papenfuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/02/22 Thu AM 12:41:53 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: 85mm f1.8 SMCT on ebay : $400+
I'm jumping in a bit late on this, but I've got a couple of
comments about my opinion of Sony
Commenting on your
From: Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You're not alone. The PDML is swimming in self-fulfilling prophesies.
So the digital LX _is_ on the way?
Good.
About £500 while you're at it, please. _With_ all the useful bits.
-
Email sent from
On 21/2/07, Adam Maas, discombobulated, unleashed:
They just announced the 1D mk III. It's got a few interesting bits.
Live view. Yep, you can have the mirror flipped up and frame with the
new 3 LCD (with 5x and 10x magnification), no delays for shooting
either (unlike the Oly and Panasonic in
On 21/2/07, Nick Wright, discombobulated, unleashed:
Anyway, long story short. I still shoot Canon digital because my
employer requires it. But I'm going to start purchasing old Pentax
manual stuff again simply for the pleasure of photography.
Hi Nick, welcome back.
I suppose you better have a
On 21/2/07, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
My boyfriend has a Canon 5D, and he said that's what all
the pros use. I said,
Well that's ass-backwards for starters. But being a petite blonde
excuses her, of course.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places,
On 22/2/07, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
Good God! Don't point those things at Boris, he'll go into orbit.
Let's talk about tittles.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML
On 22/2/07, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
But what about my integrity? And would you still respect me in the
morning?
This assumes that you have some respect..
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
This would more or less coincide with the way I've been using my PD7X
although of course I don't have ability to view the files on the device.
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I've had the P2000 since Spring 2005. It's been to the UK twice, been
in my bag on five trips to NY, Mexico, etc. I take care
Bumps in the track will do that every time.
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/02/22 Thu AM 05:21:57 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO -- Mill Dam
Dammit Paul, you derailed my train of thought!
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Forgot the important
Hi James
I can't answer all of those questions as I've only been playing with Lightroom
and haven't used it as seriously as others on the list. I'm also still using
the Lightroom beta - delaying installing version 1 until after the beta expires.
Anyway - I have no problems importing from my
I haven't used Lightroom yet, but it sounds like it works in much the
same way as ACR. You import a group of files with Bridge or Browser,
convert a file, then export it either to Photoshop or to a folder
where it's saved.
On Feb 22, 2007, at 6:24 AM, Brian Walters wrote:
Hi James
I
On 2/21/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
. She looks at my camera and says, I thought all pros used
Canon cameras. My boyfriend has a Canon 5D, and he said that's what all
the pros use. come:-))).
Paul
SigghAll these Nikons and Pentax cameras i have, and i'm still
not a
On 2/22/07, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You're not alone. The PDML is swimming in self-fulfilling prophesies.
So the digital LX _is_ on the way?
Good.
About £500 while you're at it, please. _With_ all the useful bits.
Yes, sir.
specifically for people who only want to buy the new body, cost
will be higher, yes, but not necessarily economically unfeasable forever
which is what
you are implying here.
jco
Actually, it's what everyone *except* you are implying
including the folks who could actually build
Hehe... that's about right Cotty. Don't get me wrong I do love my job.
But I'm really starting to just hate digital in general.
I miss my small light quiet compact cameras. I miss grain (and hate
noise). I hate paying $300 for a plastic lens when I can get a vintage
Pentax equivalent for less
I'm jumping in a bit late on this, but I've got a couple of
comments about my opinion of Sony
Commenting on your own opinion is rather Napoleonic, even for PDML.
Err... PEBKAC. I wasn't commenting on my own opinions... just
that I wanted to express my opinions on the then-topic
Folks have been talking about this for a while. All the rumors hurt my head. ;D
Frankly, as far as all that goes, I'm perfectly happy with my original
Marki 1Ds. I know Canon's got to continually be coming out with the
next biggest and baddest, but I still get annoyed at all the marketing
hype.
From: Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/02/22 Thu PM 01:06:20 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Re: Pentax SMC 15mm f/3.5 on digital
On 2/22/07, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You're not alone.
On Feb 22, 2007, at 7:18 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
Pic please.:-)
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5628194size=lg
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5628202size=lg
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Good light distribution, IMO. They appear to be fighting as a team
against someone out of frame to the right. :)
I am adding the 540 (to compliment my 360) soon. The high ceiling
bounce and Omnibounce spread were accomplished nicely.
Jack
--- Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One of the
From: A Pro (Nick Wright)
I miss my small light quiet compact cameras. I miss grain (and hate
noise). I hate paying $300 for a plastic lens when I can get a vintage
Pentax equivalent for less than $100. ;;D
Mark!
-
Email sent from
On 2/22/07 8:43 AM, Paul Stenquist, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5628202size=lg
Body beautiful, boob champ? What a fitting logo! :-).
Ken
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 17:06:13 -0800, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote
On Feb 21, 2007, at 3:33 PM, John Whittingham wrote:
Both the DA14 and the DA12-24 are excellent quality lenses and a
beautiful match to the DSLRs. They're not even horrendously
expensive like the Nikon or Canon 14mm lenses are.
On 2/22/07 9:02 AM, John Whittingham, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Reviews don't really tell you enough, imo. How can you judge a lens
without using it?
No, but they're a damn good starting point, nothing like a bit of scientific
testing and it's never done me any harm in the past.
Agree.
I
Adam Maas wrote:
They just announced the 1D mk III. It's got a few interesting bits.
Live view.
Cool. I'm not interested, but I know a lot of people with specific
needs will be thrilled.
14 bit colour in RAW mode. I expect this will quickly become the
new standard over 12 bit RAW's.
You're
Ken Takeshita wrote:
On 2/21/07, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They just announced the 1D mk III. It's got a few interesting bits.
So far, people are not impressed by sample images as they say they are
soft.
What? You mean people are whining about image quality from a
newly-introduced
Actually, what I was trying to say is that the price of DSLRs is not the
real, standalone price of a unique product. It is a subsidised price,
where the manufacturer will accept a reduced profit or even a loss in
order to tap the more lucrative lens sales that should ensue, or to deny
a sale to a
One more PESO and that will be enough for a while. I decided to do a
BW conversion on the Chartreuse Coupe II that I posted a while ago.
Of course that would have removed the reason for its name so I made a
few alterations.
I wanted to say that but decided not to. (and Mark said it much better).
Mark Roberts wrote:
Ken Takeshita wrote:
On 2/21/07, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They just announced the 1D mk III. It's got a few interesting bits.
So far, people are not impressed by sample
- Original Message -
From: P. J. Alling
Subject: Re: 85mm f1.8 SMCT on ebay : $400+
You're not listening.
Get used to it.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
I doubt that was the case of the Epson RD-1, or any Voightlander Bessa
film model for that matter as they were aimed directly at the existing
Leica s and l lens base. I doubt that Cosina doesn't at least break
even, (cover RD, all manufacturing costs and return on investment), on
every unit
Mark Roberts wrote:
Adam Maas wrote:
They just announced the 1D mk III. It's got a few interesting bits.
Live view.
Cool. I'm not interested, but I know a lot of people with specific
needs will be thrilled.
14 bit colour in RAW mode. I expect this will quickly become the
new
- Original Message -
From: P. J. Alling
Subject: Re: 85mm f1.8 SMCT on ebay : $400+
I doubt that was the case of the Epson RD-1, or any Voightlander Bessa
film model for that matter as they were aimed directly at the existing
Leica s and l lens base. I doubt that Cosina doesn't at
The black and white conversion looks nice, but I'm not a big fan of
bw with a splash of color photos. Personal preference. Nothing
wrong with it. That said, I prefer the original.
On 2/22/07, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One more PESO and that will be enough for a while. I decided
Just had a chance to look through the book.
Lots of pretty pictures, lots of before and after, very little on in between.
Couple of step by steps, not many like Fraser or Kelby have in their
books, but a few.
Mostly he desaturates and uses third party filters and plugins.
Not really a great go
I guess you dont understand the word forever, and cant
argue a topic on the topic instead of resorting to
the old everyone else disagreed with you so you have got
to be mistaken argument which isnt an argument when all
those other posts were handily rebutted.
jco
-Original Message-
hi, I dont agree with your economic model of DSLR pricing
even on todays available models so I certainly dont agree
that the M42 DSLR cannot be economically unfeasable forever
becuase there would be no lenses sold to subsidize the price
of the body. That is not even the case now, pricing of
Bruce, I think the plane of focus is about at her
shoulder; the eyes are soft.
Nice pic otherwise, especially the lighting and
timing.
Rick
--- Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just testing out the SR a bit. My daughter was
laying on the floor
with one of those 'looks'
Pentax K10D,
Cotty wrote:
On 21/2/07, Adam Maas, discombobulated, unleashed:
They just announced the 1D mk III. It's got a few interesting bits.
Live view. Yep, you can have the mirror flipped up and frame with the
new 3 LCD (with 5x and 10x magnification), no delays for shooting
either (unlike the
Somehow this strikes me as cluttered, Peter.
--- P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My missing URL:
http://www.mindspring.com/~morephotos/PESO_--_milldam.html
P. J. Alling wrote:
One more BW conversion.
An abandoned water mill dam on a tributary to the
Connecticut river.
You're just horsing around...g
--- David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh whoa is me.
http://www.photo.net/photos/RickW
No need to miss a message. Get email on-the-go
with Yahoo! Mail for Mobile.
This is appealing. There may be either a little too
much, or a little too little, of the OOF tree on the
lower right, though.
Rick
--- Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Took this on my walk today along with about a dozen
others. This was
the only one that fit this particular
Brian,
If I were you, I'd download and go with the Lightroom 1.0 30 Day Free
Trial. The 1.0 release has so much more functionality than the beta
and runs faster, also many features have been enhanced or changed
into better ways of doing things.
The tutorial videos I mentioned are also very
It is ,but I clambered 20 feet down a 90° slope to get the shot. I'll
be damned if I'm going to risk falling into freezing water and not show
the shot to someone.
Rick Womer wrote:
Somehow this strikes me as cluttered, Peter.
--- P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My missing URL:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5630338
Shot this last Sunday. Man the wind was cold.:-)
This is an abandoned Mennonite Church, built around 1860's. Back in
the early 70's the government of Canada expropriated a huge amount of
land, to build an airport East of Toronto. Public
I said that hoof hardedly
Dave
On 2/22/07, Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You're just horsing around...g
--- David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh whoa is me.
http://www.photo.net/photos/RickW
I like this one Godfrey.
Looks nice against the sky and i think the bit of tree/plant in the
lower right buts it into perspective.
Dave
On 2/22/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Took this on my walk today along with about a dozen others. This was
the only one that fit this
Cropped, I would like it very much. ;-) Very minimalist.
Tom C.
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: DUG [EMAIL PROTECTED], PDML List PDML@pdml.net,PAW
[EMAIL PROTECTED], SeePhoto Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PAW 2007 - 08 - GDG
David J Brooks wrote:
On 2/22/07, Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh whoa is me.
You're just horsing around...g
I said that hoof hardedly
Dave, don't be intimidated by the neigh-sayers.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 08:58:26AM +, Cotty wrote:
On 22/2/07, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
Good God! Don't point those things at Boris, he'll go into orbit.
Let's talk about tittles.
http://www.panix.com/~johnf/temp/bootcamp.jpg
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 08:43:36AM -0500, Paul Stenquist wrote:
On Feb 22, 2007, at 7:18 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
Pic please.:-)
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5628194size=lg
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5628202size=lg
It had to be done ...
- Original Message -
From: David J Brooks
Subject: Re: NY Times stringers shoot Pentax!
I said that hoof hardedly
Good, the last thing we need is another whinny photographer.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Nice pic. It doesn't look abandoned.
Also, with the history you gave, shouldn't the title
be Out of Services (plural)?
(sorry...couldn't resist!)
Rick
--- David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5630338
Shot this last Sunday. Man the wind was
I said that hoof hardedly
Good, the last thing we need is another whinny photographer.
Not very tack-fully said.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Note that Cosina is making a killing selling LTM and M mount lenses that
are almost as good as the Leica's for 1/5th the price, and selling these
to a lot of Leica users (Cosina makes the only available 15mm and 12mm
lenses for RF's as well). They certainly are subsidizing the bodies with
the
Joining the appreciative chorus...
Somehow I don't think I have the original message, so I'll answer here...
I really like it. The breaking ice on the foreground makes it work for me.
Boris
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Fernando Terrazzino
Subject: PESO:
Well, Cotty, I saw your jeep in person... Those tough British guys...
;-)...
Boris
Cotty wrote:
On 19/2/07, Boris Liberman, discombobulated, unleashed:
I mean, really, please someone tell me when and why I would need to
protect my memory cards unless I am somewhere in the desert or
Bob, Julia demands ;-) that you show us what is on the bottom of the
picture. I mean that bottom that you have cut off.
I for one like it. It has this fascinating quality of being so much
unusual it makes one like it.
Boris
Bob W wrote:
I'm not sure whether this one works or not. The
hi,
what evidence is there to support your theory that the
bodies are being subsidized with lens sales profits?
If they are selling a lot of theses lenses to Leica users,
why would they even need to offer a body to sell them, let
alone sell the bodies at a loss by subsidizing them?
jco
Peter, except rather slow picasa I must say I really like what I see.
Boris
Peter Lacus wrote:
Hi,
just a remembrance to my Southwest trip...
http://picasaweb.google.com/placus/USA/photo#5031519174954113202
Pentax MX, SMC Pentax M28/3.5, AGFA RSXII-50, color unmanaged
Cheers,
Thanks Godfrey, you do it again ;-) - my sentiment exactly. Not only
this big camera pointing at Molly but yet another one as well... I would
be frightened if I was in Molly's place.
Boris
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Feb 15, 2007, at 12:40 PM, Scott Loveless wrote:
I've been toying with
- Original Message -
From: Rick Womer
Subject: Re: Peso No Service
Nice pic. It doesn't look abandoned.
The cold preserves them..
William Robb
Also, with the history you gave, shouldn't the title
be Out of Services (plural)?
Lovely... Caught in the act ;-).
Boris
Alastair Robertson wrote:
http://www.pbase.com/image/74468165
Masha loves her novels - I caught her unawares as she soaked up some
sun last Sunday.
K10D A*200/2.8 Tripod F8 1/30 ISO 100
Comments welcome
Alastair
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
The lamp, Sir William, the lamp!
:-(
Boris
William Robb wrote:
Bella takes her duties a a guard dog quite seriously. Here, she has spotted
some kids on the sidewalk and si staring them away.
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/fellas/bella/bella1922.html
Have fun
William Robb
--
Tom,
I found the recent comments on the the three PESO's I posted quite
interesting. I appreciate the feedback and naturally don't expect
everyone's taste to be the same. I'm happy that they were generally well
received.
...
To me, judging one against the other is like comparing a
Ralf, this is magnificent picture, but please tell me what DRI means?
Thanks!
BOris
Ralf R. Radermacher wrote:
Been playing around some more with DRI and things begin to look
encouraging:
http://www.fotocommunity.de/pc/pc/mypics/770012/display/7977355
This is one from our last trip to
Thanks, Boris.
On 2/22/07, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joining the appreciative chorus...
Somehow I don't think I have the original message, so I'll answer here...
I really like it. The breaking ice on the foreground makes it work for me.
Boris
William Robb wrote:
-
Ann,
this is going to be a long thread for the wrong reason I can see now !
this is the right link
http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=449168
(I know I don't NEED to explain - but it happened cause i had to cut and
paste
the link of yours from netscape into firefox when
Tom, positively we need to invent a smartass smiley that will be our
club trademark ;-).
Boris
Tom C wrote:
Hey Boris! Thanks.
I was going to show it with some others in close succession, but I'd deserve
what I'd get you know.
You didn't offend me. I just chose Friday to be a
Hmmm, again I don't see the original message in my mailbox.
Godfrey, there is certain timelessness in these shots. There is one
Russian rock-song that I keep recalling looking at them. This song I
love dearly. Anyway, this is wonderful body of art.
Thanks!
Boris
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Nice
Thanks to everyone for their replies. I found it quite interesting. This was
not the type of poll I would tally, since it was more individual, so I won't.
I hope others found it interesting as well.
And if you still want to answer, feel free.
Thx again!, Marnie aka Doe :-)
Thanks Boris! :-)
G
On Feb 22, 2007, at 10:52 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
Godfrey, there is certain timelessness in these shots. There is one
Russian rock-song that I keep recalling looking at them. This song I
love dearly. Anyway, this is wonderful body of art.
On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 09:14:19 -0500, K.Takeshita wrote
On 2/22/07 9:02 AM, John Whittingham, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Reviews don't really tell you enough, imo. How can you judge a lens
without using it?
No, but they're a damn good starting point, nothing like a bit of
scientific
Mark Roberts wrote:
Adam Maas wrote:
They just announced the 1D mk III. It's got a few interesting bits.
Live view.
Cool. I'm not interested, but I know a lot of people with specific
needs will be thrilled.
That's a great feature - and if the lcd screen is the one that flips out
Great, Paul!
Maybe you need to come to NY to deliver them hehe
ann
Paul Stenquist wrote:
At 4PM today I got a call from the photo desk at the NY Times. They
wanted to know if I could shoot an exercise class in West Bloomfield,
Michigan at six. Of course I said yes and ducked out of work
On Feb 22, 2007, at 1:18 PM, Dave Kennedy wrote:
I said that hoof hardedly
Good, the last thing we need is another whinny photographer.
Not very tack-fully said.
By the way, I had to shoot a bit of the next class as well: bridle
boot camp.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
ann sanfedele wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote:
Adam Maas wrote:
They just announced the 1D mk III. It's got a few interesting bits.
Live view.
Cool. I'm not interested, but I know a lot of people with specific
needs will be thrilled.
That's a great feature - and if the lcd
Just looking at the press release from
http://www.pentax.co.jp/english/news/2007/200708.html
The 645D looks to be solidifying in design spec. Key points of
interest to me:
- ~32Mpixel currently
- compatibility with existing Pentax 645 lenses (all most likely)
- CF and SD card slots (don't chuck
I used the Cosina Voigtlander 70/2.8 on my old screwmount Leica. Very
nice lens. I paid $250 for it in LN condition and sold it for $270
when I had to raise money for D number two.
Paul
On Feb 22, 2007, at 1:18 PM, Adam Maas wrote:
Note that Cosina is making a killing selling LTM and M mount
All true. However, barring series variation, you won't find a dog
among the DA lenses, particularly not the 14.2.8 or DA 12-24. Here's
another pic from the DA 12-24 that brought me some cash:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5429605size=lg
On Feb 22, 2007, at 2:37 PM, John
On Feb 22, 2007, at 6:14 AM, K.Takeshita wrote:
Reviews don't really tell you enough, imo. How can you judge a lens
without using it?
No, but they're a damn good starting point, nothing like a bit of
scientific
testing and it's never done me any harm in the past.
Agree.
I for one
Oh whoa is me.
You're just horsing around...g
I said that hoof hardedly
Dave, don't be intimidated by the neigh-sayers.
What's you mane point?
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
Wish I could. No NY on my horizon now, but things change. Delivered
the pics (5x7 @ 300 dpi high quality jpegs) at midnight last night.
Everyone is happy.
Paul
On Feb 22, 2007, at 3:13 PM, ann sanfedele wrote:
Great, Paul!
Maybe you need to come to NY to deliver them hehe
ann
Paul
On 22/2/07, ann sanfedele, discombobulated, unleashed:
That's a great feature - and if the lcd screen is the one that flips out
on a hinge so you can shoot from
the waist and see what you've got - sigh. wish I had some dough for
that...
It's not, Ann. To quote Larry Sanders, 'no flipping'.
On 22/2/07, Boris Liberman, discombobulated, unleashed:
Well, Cotty, I saw your jeep in person... Those tough British guys...
;-)...
I was sailing a Laser at the time Boris. And probably thinking of
titties, hence the dunking.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places,
Cotty wrote:
Oh whoa is me.
You're just horsing around...g
I said that hoof hardedly
Dave, don't be intimidated by the neigh-sayers.
What's you mane point?
There's no point to this. Not a bit.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Cotty wrote:
I was sailing a Laser at the time
YOU? on a LASER? No f-ing way you'd fit.
--
Christian
http://photography.skofteland.net
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
- Original Message -
From: Boris Liberman
Subject: Re: PESO, Another dog picture
The lamp, Sir William, the lamp!
:-(
It's a nice picture of a dog on a couch beside sewing machine with a lamp on
it.
Some things can't be helped.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 15:04:07 -0600, William Robb wrote
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
Subject: Re: Pentax SMC 15mm f/3.5 on digital
I review specs, test reports, and ask/read people's opinions before I
buy things too. I don't judge the items in question until I've
On 2/22/07, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tom, positively we need to invent a smartass smiley that will be our
club trademark ;-).
Boris
http://www.muller-godschalk.com/noturning.html
and scroll for smartass
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Mark?
...
James?
;;D
On 2/22/07, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: A Pro (Nick Wright)
I miss my small light quiet compact cameras. I miss grain (and hate
noise). I hate paying $300 for a plastic lens when I can get a vintage
Pentax equivalent for less than $100. ;;D
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
Subject: Re: Pentax SMC 15mm f/3.5 on digital
I review specs, test reports, and ask/read people's opinions before I
buy things too. I don't judge the items in question until I've
actually used them.
This is the conundrum of the modern
1 - 100 of 209 matches
Mail list logo
