On Feb 17, 2011, at 8:55 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
> From: Larry Colen
>> On Feb 17, 2011, at 9:54 AM, John Sessoms wrote:
>>
>> If you're ever shooting in a photo studio, there will be big mirrors.
>> Also large windows work also. It gives a sharper bounce than just a
>> white wall.
>
> I
Ah, OK! :-D
Eddie used to hustle quite a bit, so I thought you might know him. He
owned a bar called The Rack up until the early 90's and a lot of good
players went through there. I used to play there some, and shot a
decent game for a couple of years, but burned out. I've tried picking
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Doug Franklin"
Subject: Re: OT: The Myth of the Unmanipulated Image
On 2011-02-17 23:59, Ken Waller wrote:
I think the real meaning of "unmanipulated" is "snapshot". JMHO, of
course.
The
Not a bad capture at all. A little unsharp mask, and setting of white & dark
point will improve it further.
I'm impressed that a three year old would even call it an owl!
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Brendan MacRae"
Subje
On 2011-02-17 23:59, Ken Waller wrote:
I think the real meaning of "unmanipulated" is "snapshot". JMHO, of
course.
The unmanipulated image is exposed, un processed film or just a bunch of
X's & O's.
For fear of being serious in a joke thread, the only unmanipluated
images are the ones you h
On 2011-02-18 0:39, Walter Gilbert wrote:
Hey, Doug ... have you ever played against a guy named Eddie Moore out
of Paducah, KY by any chance?
Oh, I doubt it. I haven't played in years, and even when I did it was
on the "bowling alley circuit" (which ever bowling alley had the
"stupidest" po
The moon pictures I looked at all have histograms displaced markedly to the
left instead of being spread out across the entire horizontal axis - meaning
they're somewhat under exposed. Attempting to spread out the histogram
in-camera by making exposure adjustments will brighten the captured imag
I was @ Whitefish Point a week ago last Monday - about 18 inches snow,
howling wind (at least 35mph - constant) & 10 degrees - no birds. It was far
too cold (with wind chill included) for any kind of photography.
I'd recommend some of those chemical hand warmer packets.
BTW - I was in the U. P
Hey, Doug ... have you ever played against a guy named Eddie Moore
out of Paducah, KY by any chance?
-- Walt
On 2/17/2011 11:24 PM, Doug Franklin wrote:
On 2011-02-17 23:00, Paul Stenquist wrote:
This is an eight week annual eight-ball tournament
Ahhh, that puts a bit of a different co
Hi all,
So, I've been getting a lot of soft images lately when using my K-x with
the K-50/1.4 and wondering what I'm doing wrong. Well, I think I've
figured it out.
I took a good look at the viewfinder glass and discovered that it's not
in good shape. I don't know if the sweat from using
On 2011-02-17 23:00, Paul Stenquist wrote:
This is an eight week annual eight-ball tournament
Ahhh, that puts a bit of a different complexion on it. As you know, the
mind plays in those games as much as the hands, just like lots of other
face-to-face competition. Lord only knows what, if
From: Bruce Walker
There's only one very narrowly defined case where the camera is THE
tool. If you glue a flash memory card into a camera with one lens
permanently attached, then take shots in available light which you only
ever view on the 3" LCD on the back -- then yes, that's your only tool.
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 3:11 PM, frank theriault
wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 11:05 AM, John Sessoms wrote:
>
>> The camera is just one tool in the photographer's toolbox.
>
> I think that deserves a "MARK!", even though I kind of disagree with you.
>
> Surely the camera is more than "jus
From: Steven Desjardins
"Still, that was a great quote, John. ?Very pithy. ?I like pith."
I dunno. I'm kind of pithed off.
Better than being pithed on.
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 4:11 PM, frank theriault
wrote:
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 11:05 AM, John Sessoms wrote:
The camera is just one
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Steven Desjardins"
Subject: Re: OT: The Myth of the Unmanipulated Image
I think the real meaning of "unmanipulated" is "snapshot". JMHO, of
course.
The unmanipulated image is exposed, un p
From: Larry Colen
On Feb 17, 2011, at 9:54 AM, John Sessoms wrote:
A little DIY magic with gaffers tape and you could mount a small
LED flashlight to the strobe for a modeling light that would help
in aiming the strobe.
That's an excellent idea. Though I could probably get away with
mounting
So today I'm having lunch with my 3 year old when he starts pointing out the
widow and saying, "Daddy, there's an owl! An owl!" I asked him where he was
looking and there just over a neighbors' fence was a raptor in a tree not 25
feet from where we were sitting. I asked him to keep still and I s
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
> I first liked the "one tool" quote. Then thought Frank had a point.
> Then realized that that both are correct.
I'm feeling like I'm in an old Wrigley's gum commercial...
;-)
cheers,
frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henr
Pretty darn amazing for no tripod. How do you stop your heartbeat for that long?
: )
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Walter Gilbert wrote:
Wow, Ann! I'd never even heard of the majority of those animals.
yup, they aren't native to Kentucky ;-)
Not a bad shot in the bunch, obviously -- but that Nicobar Pigeon was
my favorite. I've never seen anything quite like it, and you captured
the colors bea
On Feb 17, 2011, at 10:35 PM, Doug Franklin wrote:
> On 2011-02-17 22:15, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>
>> I think he was still considering his options at this point.
>
> I'd say so, too, except for the blur on the cue and his hand. He's "hinkin'
> around" with the cue. If he's experienced, he's j
LOL Paul Well now sometimes one just has to snap a quick pic when the cat is
in a take my picture before I move out of line of site LOL
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Paul
Stenquist
Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2011 9:36 PM
To
Wow, Ann! I'd never even heard of the majority of those animals.
Not a bad shot in the bunch, obviously -- but that Nicobar Pigeon was my
favorite. I've never seen anything quite like it, and you captured the
colors beautifully!
-- Walt
On 2/17/2011 5:32 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
http:
On 2011-02-17 22:15, Paul Stenquist wrote:
I think he was still considering his options at this point.
I'd say so, too, except for the blur on the cue and his hand. He's
"hinkin' around" with the cue. If he's experienced, he's just hinkin'
around, as he studies his options. If he's a novi
Not much you could do to eliminate those bright coors in the background. The
best alternative here would have been to move the cat:-). The only other way
you might be able to diminish the background would be to limit the light back
there.
Paul
On Feb 17, 2011, at 10:28 PM, Jeffery Johnson wrote
Thanks Paul need to learn how to get the background less detailed. Any
advice on what settings I should have adjusted to cause the background to be
less noticeable.
Thanks,
Jeffery
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Paul
Stenquist
Se
This was taken around 8:00pm so close to the horizon. I have a cheap
telephoto converter that I am going to attempt to use tomorrow night and see
if I can get it to work properly and see what I can get out of it.
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net
Steven Desjardins wrote:
The face of the red panda is great, as is the snow leopard.
thanks, Steve
I was so lucky the Panda was active and in good light... all he did was
sleep and face away from the viewing are the last time I was there.
(notice I took one of the panda shots out of this g
I have to say I'm amazed you can get that much detail witht the 55-300
of the moon...
are you photo'ing this when the moon is just rising? close to the horizon?
Thanks for your compliment on my besaties, btw
ann
Jeffery Johnson wrote:
Just wanted to send a warning as the following contains
Good detail on the moon. The cat shot is appealing and reasonably well
composed. However, the background is distracting IMO.
But good progress.
Paul
On Feb 17, 2011, at 10:10 PM, Jeffery Johnson wrote:
> Just wanted to send a warning as the following contains this evenings moon
> shots and yes it
On Feb 17, 2011, at 10:01 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
>
>
> Paul Stenquist wrote:
>
>> He never saw me. He sunk the shot. I was relatively far away -- perhaps ten
>> feet and to his side.
>> Paul
>>
> Funny, his eyes looked so unlike someone concentrating
I think he was still considering h
Thanks - I'll look for it.
I am joining a Whitefish Point Bird Observatory sponsored birding trip in the
Sault Ste. Marie neighborhood this weekend. AFIK, the other 15 on the trip are
birders (who may also take photographs) rather than photographers (who enjoy
shooting birds). It will be interes
Just wanted to send a warning as the following contains this evenings moon
shots and yes it has one cat shot too.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/jt-johnson/sets/72157626078196746/
As always be gentle.. I am hoping for a clearer night tomorrow night and I
will use the tripod tomorrow night but for
Bong Manayon wrote:
A little story to share :-)
http://bongm.blogspot.com/2011/02/edge-of-lunacy.html
Enjoy!
I did!
ann
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
Paul Stenquist wrote:
He never saw me. He sunk the shot. I was relatively far away -- perhaps ten
feet and to his side.
Paul
Funny, his eyes looked so unlike someone concentrating
ann
On Feb 17, 2011, at 9:32 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
I had the feeling he was very aware of you
He never saw me. He sunk the shot. I was relatively far away -- perhaps ten
feet and to his side.
Paul
On Feb 17, 2011, at 9:32 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
> I had the feeling he was very aware of you and not really concentrating on
> the shot... (certainly the girl in the background
> was watchin
I had the feeling he was very aware of you and not really concentrating
on the shot... (certainly the girl in the background
was watching you.) Did he sink the shot?
ann
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Very little processing. Just a conversion with some fill and white balance correction before convert
Very little processing. Just a conversion with some fill and white balance
correction before converting to BW. No noise reduction or sharpening here,
other than any sharpening ACR does at the zero setting on clarity.
Paul
On Feb 17, 2011, at 8:41 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
> I'm still amazed
On Feb 17, 2011, at 1:13 PM, frank theriault wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 6:45 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
>>
>>
>> This shot, however, was done by bouncing my flash off a mirror, a few feet
>> to the left of the stage. Since Gypsyjack was on the left end of the stage,
>> I was able to side l
Don't tell anyone on the list that I said this, but they are all
*AWESOME!*
-- Walt
On 2/17/2011 10:23 AM, John Sessoms wrote:
Where in Western Kentucky?
My mom's family is from the area around Fredonia, KY.
-
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version:
Nice try, but the list knows all and sees all. ;-)
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 1:19 PM, frank theriault
wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 11:23 AM, John Sessoms wrote:
>> Where in Western Kentucky?
>>
>> My mom's family is from the area around Fredonia, KY.
>
> You may have thought this was off-list
That's a great shot. Composition that defies all the rules.
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 5:32 PM, DagT wrote:
> Hah, I´ll remember that one :-)
>
> Late thanks to Ann, frank, Mark and Christine (although I disagree about the
> face .-)!
>
> DagT
> http://www.thrane.name
>
>
>
> Den 13. feb. 2011 kl.
I'm still amazed at how good iso 6400 looks, especially B&W. Did you
do much PP?
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 6:21 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> Good idea. Great movie. I'd love to shoot in a pool hall with that kind of
> ambience -- although I might not live to tell about it:-).
> Paul
>
>
> On Feb 1
The face of the red panda is great, as is the snow leopard.
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 6:32 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
>
> http://annsan.smugmug.com/Works-in-Print/Works-In-Progress/More-Critters/15842756_6QmYN
>
> Just 8 photos - large thumbnails to start with :-)
>
> 2 different zoo's The Centrtal
Wonderful. I think you just discovered how several religions started.
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 7:55 PM, Bong Manayon wrote:
> A little story to share :-)
>
> http://bongm.blogspot.com/2011/02/edge-of-lunacy.html
>
> Enjoy!
>
> --
> Bong Manayon
> http://www.bong.uni.cc
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discus
A little story to share :-)
http://bongm.blogspot.com/2011/02/edge-of-lunacy.html
Enjoy!
--
Bong Manayon
http://www.bong.uni.cc
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
Very nice Ann very nice Perhaps at some point I will get pictures that
will turn out as good.
Jeffery
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Ann
Sanfedele
Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2011 5:32 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject
Cotty, Mark, Eric,
There is a difference. But it seems that digital is forgiving. Enough, anyway.
Similar to being a stop or so off with C-41.
Easily dealt with.
Still, I think that the problem may not always be so severe.
I looked once at an A50/2 and the M50/2.
The arm appeared to be identical.
Thanks, Ann.
I've been trying to find a decent Wordpress plugin for image galleries,
but it's been incredibly frustrating. Everything I've tried has had
something about it I just don't like -- whether it's the way it composes
the thumbnail page, the way it handles the photos themselves, or h
Walt -- I liked the thumbnails, but I had a devil of a time navigating
the page... I could figure out how to go to the next photo
without going back to the index, all the files were too big without
using the zoom out feature in Firefox...
I just couldnt get a really good view. might be that whe
http://www.foto8.com/new/online/reviews/1361-new-york-in-postcards
and something else that might interest our US chums:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-12499456
B
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please vi
http://annsan.smugmug.com/Works-in-Print/Works-In-Progress/More-Critters/15842756_6QmYN
Just 8 photos - large thumbnails to start with :-)
2 different zoo's The Centrtal Park Zoo and the Queens Borough zoo
(just the Pudu and the Thick-billed parrot)
This week -- Monday Cetranl Park - Yester
Why can't people scroll for vertical shots? What is the requirement
that the entire picture be shown onscreen?
If it's a real issue, change the gallery behavior to display a naked
image when you click on the larger size. That way the image will
scale to the size of the viewer's browser window, a
I agree with most of what you've outlined. 900 pixels wide is perfect for
horizontals and 300 K is ample. But I'd go to 800 pixels wide for verticals. in
this day of hi-res monitors, most can accommodate that. And while my laptop is
only 1280 x 800, and I occasionally view images on it, I'd rath
Good idea. Great movie. I'd love to shoot in a pool hall with that kind of
ambience -- although I might not live to tell about it:-).
Paul
On Feb 17, 2011, at 1:30 PM, Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
> Makes me want to pull out an old Paul Newman/Jackie Gleason movie.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Collin Bre
Thanks Frank. Love those capital letters:-).
Paul
On Feb 17, 2011, at 1:27 PM, frank theriault wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Paul Stenquist
> wrote:
>> Shot a bit at the pool hall last night. K5 and the DA* 50-135, f3.5, 1/25th,
>> 58mm, ISO 6400. Went with a bit longer lens this ti
Thanks Dan, they were cooperative subjects...
Regards, Bob S.
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 3:55 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
> That is a great image! The "spiked hairdo" on the one and the wing
> posture of both make the image a story in itself. Great I and perfect
> timing.
>
> Dan M
>
> On Thu, F
On 18/2/11, Brian Walters, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Interesting article and well within Cotty's ability I would have
>thought.
I couldn't bring myself to look over the whole page when confronted with
such a ghastly web page design!
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Place
On 17/02/2011 3:02 PM, frank theriault wrote:
Yesterday on the way home I bought paper cones and used the old
Melitta manual drip. Makes surprisingly good coffee, but not as good
as the Bodum. Oh well.
Two Melitta scoops each of Ethiopian Harrar and Colombian, grind just
prior to use.
Pour
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 08:01:14AM +1100, Brian Walters wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Currently images submitted for inclusion in our Pentax Users Gallery
> (PUG) are supposed to meet the following criteria:
>
> # Maximum file size is 256kb.
> # Maximum image dimension is 720 pixels on the longest side.
>
Hah, I´ll remember that one :-)
Late thanks to Ann, frank, Mark and Christine (although I disagree about the
face .-)!
DagT
http://www.thrane.name
Den 13. feb. 2011 kl. 23.28 skrev Ann Sanfedele:
> Dag Thrane, king of minamalist Pentax photography :-)
>
> ann
>
> frank theriault wrote:
>
I can't promise anything. I need a yes from the models to let you in
before the are published.
But I would be more than happy to let you comment if they allow me to.
--
MaritimTim
http://maritimtim.blogspot.com/
2011/2/17 mike wilson :
> On 16/02/2011 01:13, Tim Øsleby wrote:
>
>> Most thought
On Feb 17, 2011, at 4:04 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
>
> On Feb 17, 2011, at 8:20 AM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
>
>> I think the real meaning of "unmanipulated" is "snapshot". JMHO, of course.
>>
>
> There's no such thing as an unmanimpulated photo, but there sure as hell are
> overmanipulated ph
I'm fairly sure the conversion is missing the most important point of
the difference between A lenses, and earlier lenses; which is that the
stop-down coupler acts linearly rather than non-linearly! The
electrical contact is merely a way for the lens to tell the camera
that a linear-stop-down type
On 11-02-17 4:11 PM, frank theriault wrote:
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 11:05 AM, John Sessoms wrote:
The camera is just one tool in the photographer's toolbox.
I think that deserves a "MARK!", even though I kind of disagree with you.
I agree with John. There's no real photography, as a pursuit
That is a great image! The "spiked hairdo" on the one and the wing
posture of both make the image a story in itself. Great I and perfect
timing.
Dan M
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 11:42 AM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
> Big Egret versus smaller Heron at Ding Darling last week.
> The little guy was pretty t
Brian -
There is a way to scale the images in the settings for the Chameleon
skin. Click on the IMAGES tab and the first item is "Fit image in
browser". The options are "None", "Shrink", "Enlarge" and "Both". I
think selecting "Both" will adjust the image size to fit whatever
browser wind
On Thu, 17 Feb 2011 18:03:18 +, you wrote:
>http://evangelicalperspective.blogspot.com/2011/02/converting-lens-to-pentax-mount.html
>
>Works for me.
>Hope you find it useful as well.
How does the camera handle the difference in the linearity of the
motion of the aperture control lever with K
On 16/02/2011 01:13, Tim Øsleby wrote:
Most thoughts are welcome.
Even the probably most sane advice: "Hey, don't do it Tim!" But if you
think so, please tell me why.
I will most likely not follow that advice, but I could learn something
from it :-)
If it's alright with you, I'd rather stick t
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 3:11 PM, frank theriault
wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 11:05 AM, John Sessoms wrote:
>
>> The camera is just one tool in the photographer's toolbox.
>
> I think that deserves a "MARK!", even though I kind of disagree with you.
>
> Surely the camera is more than "just on
On Feb 17, 2011, at 4:25 AM, Jeffery Johnson wrote:
> Thanks John I will try again and yeah I know not good to try and capture a
> full on moon but hard to pass up.
The moon is an excellent test subject because it doesn't really vary that much.
In and of itself, there's only so much you can do
On Feb 17, 2011, at 4:25 AM, Jeffery Johnson wrote:
> Thanks John I will try again and yeah I know not good to try and capture a
> full on moon but hard to pass up.
The moon is an excellent test subject because it doesn't really vary that much.
In and of itself, there's only so much you can do
"Still, that was a great quote, John. Very pithy. I like pith."
I dunno. I'm kind of pithed off.
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 4:11 PM, frank theriault
wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 11:05 AM, John Sessoms wrote:
>
>> The camera is just one tool in the photographer's toolbox.
>
> I think that de
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 6:45 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
> I was experimenting with the flash at a friend's gig tonight, mostly with a
> snoot, but with the flash off camera on a cable. The technique has definite
> promise, but it takes so much attention to aim the flash with one hand, while
> doin
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 3:08 PM, Charles Robinson wrote:
> So much snow piled up on the trees in Northern MN this last weekend.
>
> This little guy just didn't have the strength to cope anymore:
>
> http://charles.robinsontwins.org/photos/2011/lake_vermillion_feb/content/IMGP7789_large.html
Somet
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 11:05 AM, John Sessoms wrote:
> The camera is just one tool in the photographer's toolbox.
I think that deserves a "MARK!", even though I kind of disagree with you.
Surely the camera is more than "just one tool" in our toolbox. It's
~the~ tool, isn't it? Without it the
Thank you, Frank!
I was pretty smitten with the pickup, too. I wish I'd been able to get
more angles on it, but it was parked right up against the side of a
garage with a bunch of newer vehicles in the background. So, I was
forced to do what I could to obscure all the other junk -- which
I'm using an older version of full-blown Photoshop -- 7.0 to be
exact -- and have been meaning to take in some tutorials on YouTube for
a while, but just haven't gotten around to it. A lot of the reason I
haven't gotten too deeply into the post-production end of it has to do
with the lack
Interesting article and well within Cotty's ability I would have
thought.
As for me, my ham-fistedness would certainly ensure that any lens I
attempted this on would become unusable on any mount. I think I'll
persist with the green button for my K 50 1.4.
Cheers
Brian
+
On Feb 17, 2011, at 8:20 AM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
> I think the real meaning of "unmanipulated" is "snapshot". JMHO, of course.
>
There's no such thing as an unmanimpulated photo, but there sure as hell are
overmanipulated photos.
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est
--
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 11:15 AM, John Sessoms wrote:
> ... won't make coffee unless you turn it on.
>
> It's going to be another one of *THOSE* days!
I've got you beat. Yesterday morning my SO broke the glass carafe to
my Bodum French press.
Oh the agony!
She felt horrible about it, and of co
Hi all
Currently images submitted for inclusion in our Pentax Users Gallery
(PUG) are supposed to meet the following criteria:
# Maximum file size is 256kb.
# Maximum image dimension is 720 pixels on the longest side.
>From time to time there are suggestions that these limits are too
restrictive
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 9:39 PM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We had an unseasonably warm day here in western Kentucky, so I thought I'd
> take the cameras out and see what I came up with. I filled up a roll of
> Plus-X 125 on the K1000 using my 135/2.5 and will have them developed soon.
On Feb 17, 2011, at 6:45 AM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
> Well... that worked. :-)
> ann
Thanks Ann, and Bob & David.
>
> Larry Colen wrote:
>
>>
>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/5452691805/in/set-72157625947632715/
>>
>> --
>> Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est
>>
>>
>>
>>
Clean and working fine on my K-x.
$65 shipped in US PayPal.
Or ... trade for 2 modern 8x10 film holders.
Or ... trade for Eastman/Kodak 2D 4x5 reducing back.
Or ... anything else nifty you might have lying around.
Sincerely,
Collin Brendemuehl
http://kerygmainstitute.org
"He is no fool who
I have a K 28 and it's tempting to try to make it into a nice A type
normal lens. Given the source of the article, however, maybe I should
resist temptation ;-)
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Collin Brendemuehl
wrote:
> http://evangelicalperspective.blogspot.com/2011/02/converting-lens-to-pent
On Feb 17, 2011, at 9:54 AM, John Sessoms wrote:
> From: Larry Colen
>> I was experimenting with the flash at a friend's gig tonight, mostly
>> with a snoot, but with the flash off camera on a cable. The
>> technique has definite promise, but it takes so much attention to aim
>> the flash with o
From: Walter Gilbert
Thanks, John.
I was a little disappointed with the sharpness and resolution on some of
the shots, myself. Whenever I've managed to get the lens right -- and
it's been more difficult than I expected -- it is amazingly sharp. But,
it's a challenging lens for me. I hav
Makes me want to pull out an old Paul Newman/Jackie Gleason movie.
Sincerely,
Collin Brendemuehl
http://kerygmainstitute.org
"He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose"
-- Jim Elliott
>-Original Message-
>From: Jack Davis [mailto:jdavi...@yahoo.com]
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Paul Stenquist
wrote:
> Shot a bit at the pool hall last night. K5 and the DA* 50-135, f3.5, 1/25th,
> 58mm, ISO 6400. Went with a bit longer lens this time so that I could get a
> different look, pull in some background, and stay out of the shooters face.
>
> h
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 1:55 AM, Cotty wrote:
> On 15/2/11, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>>I hate you.
>
> The hate is mutual
Cool.
cheers,
frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.ne
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 11:28 AM, Scott Loveless wrote:
> Maybe, maybe, just maybe you should consider spending some time on a
> bike with a freewheel. And brakes. Switching it up a couple days a
> week might be just what you need.
Sadly, I think you may be right. I never did answer an off-li
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 8:54 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> Couple of new additions to the "Communicating" series. Enjoy!
>
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/gdgphoto/5436901379/lightbox/
> or
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/gdgphoto/5436901379/
>
> and
>
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/gdgphoto/5437510
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 11:23 AM, John Sessoms wrote:
> Where in Western Kentucky?
>
> My mom's family is from the area around Fredonia, KY.
You may have thought this was off-list, but it's not...
;-)
cheers,
frank (definitely on the list)
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Carti
From: John Sessoms
Where in Western Kentucky?
My mom's family is from the area around Fredonia, KY.
Like I said, "It's going to be one of *THOSE* days!"
-
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1204 / Virus Database: 1435/3448 - Release Date: 02/16/11
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 11:52 PM, Christine Aguila
wrote:
> That is fun, Frank. The man "holding" ceiling of the train car really makes
> the shot! Excellent. Cheers, Christine
Thanks, Christine. Other than the sleeping woman bottom left, the
hand on the ceiling made the shot.
Thanks for lo
From: "Jeffery Johnson"
Thanks John I will try again and yeah I know not good to try and capture a
full on moon but hard to pass up.
Jeffery
The good thing about shooting the full moon is you get to try again
every 28 days.
And in the meantime, you can practice on gibbous moons, quarter moo
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 7:51 PM, Jeffery Johnson
wrote:
> Nice... and how in the heck can that young lady in the left hand corner
> sleep.
Yeah, I thought she was a fun part of the photo. Glad you enjoyed.
cheers,
frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> Thumbs up! :-)
Thanks, Godfrey, and thanks to everyone else who looked and commented!
cheers,
frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailm
What a clean well composed shot! More interesting and natural when the
sensitivity can eliminate the need for flash.
Jack
--- On Thu, 2/17/11, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> From: Paul Stenquist
> Subject: PESO - Shooter
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Date: Thursday, February 17, 2011, 9:35 AM
1 - 100 of 128 matches
Mail list logo
