Enabled

Well, I finally did it. Today Adorama confirmed that my *ist D and 16-45/4 are on the way. :-) I just couldn't wait to tell someone. I've already downloaded the new firmware to install once it arrives. Now if I can just stand the anticipation until it arrives. And figure out something to cover

Enabled...

I gave in last night, and ordered a brand new FA28/2.8 from B&H. Should be here tomorrow. I love the FA35, but it is sometimes too narrow on the istD as a normal. Maybe the 28 will be the new standard lens for me. Thanks list for all the advice on this lens when I asked! j -- Juan Buhler http:

Enabled

Got one. :-) :-) :-) :-) I was a bit concerned when i first picked it up,as it is a bit smaller than the PZ-1,which i find fits my hands very well,but as soon as i looked through the viewfinder,i was sold. Interface is not to bad.Layed ou

Enabled . . .

With all the talk about should I purchase the * istD now or later I think I should announce that I've finally done it! Yes, after years of waiting . . . I've just received my "new" Pentax LX. And it's beautiful! I also purchased the SMC Pentax-M 50mm f/1.4 standard lens and the SMC Pentax-M

Enabled

I'm now the proud owner of a AF-360-FGZ No stopping me now. Opps road blocked ahead.LOL Dave -- Equine Photography www.caughtinmotion.com http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/ Ontario Canada -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Enabled

Sometimes "home and sick" isn't that bad at all. At least I had time for my DA*300 I got few days ago. When I handled it first (in January) I wasn't sure to get it - DA*60-250 sounded better for me. Now it seems that I have to get 'em both. Yes, it will be expensive but also extremely good sol

ENABLED!!!

Just got back from Don's Used Photo with a (new to me) FA* 300/4.5... Seems like a great lens, will be shooting high school football tonight. Will let you know how it goes. :) Nick - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the direc

Enabled!!!

Hey all, Just recieved my af500ftz in the mail today!!! Woo Hoo!!! I've played around with it a little already and shot off the last of a roll I had in the pz1p... I can't believe I waited this long to get this flash!!! One word... awesome! With a max range at about 100 ft with f4 lens and 800i

Enabled!

Well gang, seeing how today was FS Friday, I took a late lunch and made the trek down to my local camera store one more time to finalize on my MF path. This morning, the wife and I agreed to take the plunge (I think I agreed more than she did) and buy it today. So I came home from the store much

Enabled

Last friday I received the tripod mount for the A* 200/4.0 Macro for use on my F* 300/4.5. The smaller mount for the 200 makes the 300 much more compact & it fits into the backpack much better then it does with the larger original mount. I thank whoever it was that first posted the compatibility

Enabled

Got J.M.'s 70/2.4 LTD. Nice. Pretty black with a black cap to match. Took two shots with it right away. I'm a happy camper. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and foll

Re: Enabled

In a message dated 10/10/2005 6:03:28 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Well, I finally did it. Today Adorama confirmed that my *ist D and 16-45/4 are on the way. :-) I just couldn't wait to tell someone. I've already downloaded the new firmware to install once it arrives. No

RE: Enabled

Congrats Doug, you'll love it. I like mine more everyday. Don > -Original Message- > From: Doug Franklin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 8:03 PM > To: PDML > Subject: Enabled > > > Well, I finally did it. Today Adorama confirmed

Re: Enabled

Oohhh, Cool. If you're not going to be using that 200 2.8, I'll let you store it over my place. :) CW - Original Message - From: "Doug Franklin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PDML" Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 9:02 PM Subject: Enabled We

Re: Enabled

On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 21:15:31 -0400, cbwaters wrote: > Oohhh, Cool. > If you're not going to be using that 200 2.8, I'll let you store > it over my place. :) Sorry, Cory, but I'll be using the heck out of it. It'll cover my most used range at Road Atlanta, which I usually cover with the MZ-S and

Re: Enabled

- Original Message - From: "Doug Franklin" Subject: Enabled Well, I finally did it. Today Adorama confirmed that my *ist D and 16-45/4 are on the way. :-) I just couldn't wait to tell someone. I've already downloaded the new firmware to install once it ar

Re: Enabled

Congratulations Doug. A nice 135 will cover that 200 FOV. The K 135/2.5 is the bargain choice. I'm very happy with it. Paul On Oct 10, 2005, at 9:02 PM, Doug Franklin wrote: Well, I finally did it. Today Adorama confirmed that my *ist D and 16-45/4 are on the way. :-) I just couldn't wait to

Re: Enabled

If you must have * glass you have only one choice the A*135 f1.8. Best buy one before Canon shooters mutilate them all to use on their infernal machines. Doug Franklin wrote: Well, I finally did it. Today Adorama confirmed that my *ist D and 16-45/4 are on the way. :-) I just couldn't wai

Re: Enabled

> If you must have * glass you have only one choice the A*135 f1.8. Best > buy one before Canon shooters mutilate them all to use on their infernal > machines. P.J., are you kidding, or is this obscene mutilation actually happening? Fred

Re: Enabled

On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 23:33:27 -0400, Fred wrote: > > If you must have * glass you have only one choice the A*135 f1.8. Best > > buy one before Canon shooters mutilate them all to use on their infernal > > machines. > > P.J., are you kidding, or is this obscene mutilation actually happening? Is

Re: Enabled

Hi William and Paul, On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 19:30:51 -0600, William Robb wrote: > > And figure out something to cover the focal distance range > > I've been using the FA* 200/2.8 for. > > A nice 135/2.8 should do well. > Sad we can't get a 135/2. Geez, I should've been able to think of that! I've

Re: Enabled

Hi PJ, On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 23:25:23 -0400, P. J. Alling wrote: > If you must have * glass you have only one choice the A*135 f1.8. > Best buy one before Canon shooters mutilate them all to use on > their infernal machines. I'd like to, but I'm not willing to spend the money I've been seeing thos

Re: Enabled

I wouldn't call the K 135/2.5 the bargain choice, too many people know what it is... Paul Stenquist wrote: Congratulations Doug. A nice 135 will cover that 200 FOV. The K 135/2.5 is the bargain choice. I'm very happy with it. Paul On Oct 10, 2005, at 9:02 PM, Doug Franklin wrote: Well, I fi

Re: Enabled

It's a dig at Cotty, he's already done it to an A 85 f1.4... Fred wrote: If you must have * glass you have only one choice the A*135 f1.8. Best buy one before Canon shooters mutilate them all to use on their infernal machines. P.J., are you kidding, or is this obscene mutilation actual

Re: Enabled

On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 23:53:37 -0400, P. J. Alling wrote: > I wouldn't call the K 135/2.5 the bargain choice, too > many people know what it is... It is if you've already got one. :-) "I told him we already got one. He he he." TTYL, DougF KG4LMZ

Re: Enabled

I have the FA135 f/2.8(IF), and love it. It's hard to imagine getting such a telephoto reach and f/2.8 speed (as experienced with the 135 on a DSLR) in such a small package. The FA version of the 135 and the F are very similar. The FA is said to have slightly looser feel in manual focusing.

Re: Enabled

Hi! Well, I finally did it. Today Adorama confirmed that my *ist D and 16-45/4 are on the way. :-) I just couldn't wait to tell someone. I've already downloaded the new firmware to install once it arrives. Now if I can just stand the anticipation until it arrives. And figure out something

Re: Enabled

On Oct 10, 2005, at 8:46 PM, Doug Franklin wrote: Geez, I should've been able to think of that! I've even got both the K135/2.5 and the "Bow Wow" Takumar 135/2.5 in the drawer right now. So how is the F or FA incarnation of the 135/2.8? I like the FA135/2.8 IF. Works well, small and ligh

Re: Enabled

On 10/10/05, Doug Franklin, discombobulated, unleashed: >Well, I finally did it. Today Adorama confirmed that my *ist D and >16-45/4 are on the way. :-) I just couldn't wait to tell someone. >I've already downloaded the new firmware to install once it arrives. >Now if I can just stand the anti

Re: Enabled

On 10/10/05, Doug Franklin, discombobulated, unleashed: >On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 23:33:27 -0400, Fred wrote: > >> > If you must have * glass you have only one choice the A*135 f1.8. Best >> > buy one before Canon shooters mutilate them all to use on their infernal >> > machines. >> >> P.J., are yo

Re: Enabled

On 10/10/05, P. J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed: >It's a dig at Cotty, he's already done it to an A 85 f1.4... I'm still not talking to you. Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com _

Re: Enabled

On Tue, 11 Oct 2005 09:42:28 +0100, Cotty wrote: > >Isn't that what Cotty did? > > However, the K15 f/3.5 and the A*85 f/1.4 that I have > adapted to EOS work very well. Ah, I knew it was one (or two) of the "classics". TTYL, DougF KG4LMZ

Re: Enabled

On Tue, 11 Oct 2005 09:26:28 +0100, Cotty wrote: > On 10/10/05, Doug Franklin, discombobulated, unleashed: > > >Well, I finally did it. Today Adorama confirmed that my *ist D and > >16-45/4 are on the way. :-) [...] > > STOP PRESS: It has been reported that a snowball has just melted in > dow

Re: Enabled

Hi David, On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 21:00:09 -0700, David Oswald wrote: > I have the FA135 f/2.8(IF), and love it. It's hard to imagine > getting such a telephoto reach and f/2.8 speed (as experienced > with the 135 on a DSLR) in such a small package. [...] > Good luck, I think you'll enjoy the 135.

Re: Enabled

On 11/10/05, Doug Franklin, discombobulated, unleashed: >;-) Actually, I've wanted one for quite some time, but haven't had the >ready capital to buy one. At the Petit le Mans weekend before last I >discovered that the guy who's been doing the photography for the local >SCCA region was moving an

Re: Enabled

Ha! You did! Cotty wrote: On 10/10/05, P. J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed: It's a dig at Cotty, he's already done it to an A 85 f1.4... I'm still not talking to you. Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com __

enabled set

Already have the KX. Got in a K24/3.5. Don't they make a nice couple? : ) http://www.brendemuehl.net/images/kxk2435.jpg "He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose" -- Jim Elliott

Re: Enabled...

Good to hear Juan. I use the A28 on my istD and think its a great FL. Dave > I gave in last night, and ordered a brand new FA28/2.8 from B&H. > Should be here tomorrow. > > I love the FA35, but it is sometimes too narrow on the istD as a > normal. Mayb

Re: Enabled...

On Aug 11, 2005, at 10:06 AM, Juan Buhler wrote: I gave in last night, and ordered a brand new FA28/2.8 from B&H. Should be here tomorrow. I love the FA35, but it is sometimes too narrow on the istD as a normal. Maybe the 28 will be the new standard lens for me. I'll be interested to hear you

Re: Enabled...

You recommended the 20-35 before. I didn't go for that, because zoom-wise, I'm ok with the 16-45. I just wanted a prime lens, mostly because of the size. It's probably psychological, but I still feel self-conscious when shooting people with a big zoom. I understand the 20-35 is compact for a zoom,

Re: Enabled...

I actually have the M28/3.5, which is great, but frankly, I wanted an A lens. I had no problem shooting in manual mode with the M6 and the MX, but with those cameras changing the exposure is much faster, plus I was shooting tri-X, which is very benevolent if you tend to err on the overexposure side

Re: Enabled...

On Aug 11, 2005, at 12:37 PM, Juan Buhler wrote: You recommended the 20-35 before. I didn't go for that, because zoom-wise, I'm ok with the 16-45. I just wanted a prime lens, mostly because of the size. It's probably psychological, but I still feel self-conscious when shooting people with a big z

Optio enabled

The Optio WP arrived today. Darn, it's adorable! I'll give a report when I've had it for a while. I am in apartment-hunting hell right now, so there should be ample opportunity to use it over the next few days. Amita

Optio enabled

The Optio WP arrived today. Darn, it's adorable!. So far, I'm really impressed with its user interface. I'll give a report when I've had it for a while. I am in apartment-hunting hell right now, so there should be ample opportunity to use it over the next few days. Amita

Optio enabled

Sorry if some of you have gotten this a couple of times...I'm still getting used to Gmail and I haven't seen my post yet. Anyway, the new Optio arrived last night, and so far I'm really happy with it. In addition to being really cute, it has a great user interface and the photos aren't bad for a P&

Re: Enabled

On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 07:54:47 US/Eastern, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Got one. > :-) > :-) > :-) > :-) > > I was a bit concerned when i first picked it up,as it is a bit smaller than > the PZ-1,which > i find fits my > hands very well,but as soon as i looked t

Re: Enabled

Dave, congrats... I guess you will grow to enjoy *it* :). Welcome to the path of Electric Light :)... Boris

Re: Enabled

--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Got one. > :-) > :-) > :-) > :-) > Yeeaay. Knew you would ;-) Wendy

RE: Enabled

Why would I want to use a Microdrive? Jens Bladt mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt -Oprindelig meddelelse- Fra: John Francis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: 15. december 2004 18:37 Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Emne: Re: Enabled Jens Bladt mused: > > Congrats Dav

RE: Enabled

PROTECTED] Emne: Re: Enabled Jens Bladt mused: > > Why would I want to use a Microdrive? Because high-capacity CF cards are still quite expensive, and you only get about 70 RAW files per GB of storage. Prices are dropping; in about a year I'll probably replace my drives with higher-ca

Re: Enabled

On 15 Dec 2004 at 12:36, John Francis wrote: > I carry a special tool (basically a pair of oversized tweezers > with a small lip at the end of the blades); other folks have > added little extraction handles to their CF cards using some > variety of adhesive tape. I'd be very cautious trying that

Finally - enabled

Hi, I just wanted to tell somebody... well, few hundred people are enough I've just took back my ME Super from the repair shop. It's cleaned mostly (but now the focusing screen is dirty , some foam goo managed to get there), foam replaced and it seems to work. Unfortunatelly that screen will have

MX enabled :)

Although I know I have bodies enough I can't help but buying others :) I already have KX and SuperA+MotorA and Ricoh KR10X (which a plastic thing useful for very bad conditions :) and my brother lent me Z1 and P30t. I bought an MX (not arrived yet) and couple lenses: * SMC Pentax-M 50mm 1.4 (alr

Adapotall enabled

Today I got the Adaptall 2 mount I bought from Jim Colwell. It's great - with userguide and all. Now, my two adaptall lenses (2.8/28mm and 3.5/70-150mm) both work like A-lenses. Especially on the "D" this is a huge advantage, since I don't have to use stopped down metering anymore. The lenses are

300mm enabled

Impulse buy yesterday. Picked up a SMC-A* 300mm f4.0 lens yesterday. Amusingly, the guy in the shop showed me a Nikkor 300mm f4.5 to compare with it. Nikkor big, ugly, hard to hand hold. SMC-A*, while not actually pretty, is definitely more ergonomic, and a WHOLE lot smaller (even though its a

645 enabled

Hi all, just unpacked my new Pentax 645, and wondering about meaning of life :D Any websites where i can download some docs? Gasha

Film enabled!

Today I received Joe Wilensky's MZ-S, Battery Grip and extras. All in pristine condition. Thanks to Joe and thanks to the PDML. This is my second MZ-S, since I sold my first one, in order to finance my *ist D. I regretted this and was looking for another nice MZ-S again. I almost had forgotten the

Enabled.... hmmm

It´s strange. I was planning to buy a 77mm because I sometimes think the A*85 1.4 is too big, and suddenly I´ve got a myth in my hands. The A*135 1.8 is even larger, but I couldn´t resist at the price of NOK 3500 (a little more than US $500). At least I saved it from the hands of a collector,

RE: Enabled

ladt mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt -Oprindelig meddelelse- Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: 15. december 2004 08:55 Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Emne: Enabled Got one. :-) :-) :-) :-) I was a bit concerned when i first picked it up

Re: Enabled

Jens Bladt mused: > > Congrats Dave > >I see what you all mean about the CF card door. > >Bit of a pain,but i'll work out something > Open the door. Press the button. Tilt the camera to the right. > Pull it out, using the nail of your right thumb - enough to take it the rest > of the way with two

Re: Enabled

Congratulations, Dave. Once I got mine I never looked back. I have been using a 4GB Lexar 40X Type I, which takes up the whole slot. Now that one is hard to pull out. It also causes the camera to boot up slowly. Joe

Re: Enabled

Jens Bladt mused: > > Why would I want to use a Microdrive? Because high-capacity CF cards are still quite expensive, and you only get about 70 RAW files per GB of storage. Prices are dropping; in about a year I'll probably replace my drives with higher-capacity CF cards. But at present CF is a

Re: Enabled

> Yeeaay. Knew you would ;-) > > Wendy > I pretty much had my mind made up in the summer,just needed to sell another 40 pictures to get there.:-) I was thinking about the 20D as it has the Raw/Jpg recording combo that apeals to me,but then i'd hav

RE: Enabled

his is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist fears it is true." -J. Robert Oppenheimer From: Thrainn Vigfusson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Enabled Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 00:24:04 + I happened to walk into my Pentax s

Re: Enabled

fully you'll find other wonderful ways to spend all that money you > have. If you need any help in that regard, contact me off-list. > > cheers, > frank > > "The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The > pessimist fears it is true." -J. Robe

Re: Enabled

On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Ryan Lee wrote: > Just had to drop something about Bjork (sorry about my OT tendencies!) (her > music more than her, Frank.. I once saw this clip of her arriving in > Thailand, a reporter went up to her and said 'Welcome to Thailand!' and just > as she raised her mic for a br

Re: Enabled

From: "Ryan Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Enabled Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 12:54:26 +1000 Just had to drop something about Bjork (sorry about my OT tend

Re: Enabled...

På 20. des. 2003 kl. 01.19 skrev alex wetmore: On Fri, 19 Dec 2003, Dag T wrote: Got my *istD today, even posted an image. http://foto.no/cgi-bin/bildekritikk/vis_bilde.cgi?id=93622 A large step, since I haven´t ever owned an SLR with AF... I like it, but there´s something unstable. It sometimes

Re: Enabled...

Thanks! An FA 100 f/2.8 Macro is on it´s way, so I hope your tests were wrong :-) DagT På 20. des. 2003 kl. 00.59 skrev Jostein: Congrats, Dag! - Pictures at: http://oksne.net - - Original Message - From: "Dag T" <[EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: Enabled

I have no idea what you're talking about. "The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist fears it is true." -J. Robert Oppenheimer From: Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Man, that's a Frank Theriault line if ever I heard one! ;-) ___

Re: Enabled

AIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, January 23, 2004 1:02 AM Subject: RE: Enabled > That's funny, I just ordered it today..

645 Enabled!

I've just enabled myself with a manual focus Pentax 645 and 75mm f/2.8 from eBay. It appears to be in very good condition, and the seller said it had a service from Pentax 3 years ago. I've also got a manual focus 120mm macro on it's way, but that hasn't arrived yet. First

Re: Enabled . . .

Film was declared dead so we all rushed to deegeetal. Alexander Grigolia, Jr wrote: So, . . . what's all this rush for the * istD ???

Re: Enabled . . .

Didn't someone declare digital dead a while ago? WHAT WILL WE DO NOW Caveman wrote: Film was declared dead so we all rushed to deegeetal. Alexander Grigolia, Jr wrote: So, . . . what's all this rush for the * istD ??? -- I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war. During a war you g

Re: Enabled . . .

On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 19:43:41 -0500, Alexander Grigolia, Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > With all the talk about should I purchase the * istD now or later I > think I should announce that I've finally done it! Yes, after years of > waiting . . . > > I've just received my "new" Pentax LX. And it'

suddenly enabled

Hi gang, browsing ebay for an FA 1.4/50, I came across this offer http://cgi.ebay.de/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=300059933409 and could not resist. So I'm in much faster than I thought. Had hands on the K100D already at my local dealer's. Close to perfect for me, despite of the lack of two fe

Recently Enabled

Just thought I'd share a pic of my 2 latest acquisitions: Now all I need is some clear weather to give them a good workout. Cheers, Dave -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/

Re: Enabled

Congrats, Happy shooting, don't overheat the flash On 8/16/07, David J Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm now the proud owner of a AF-360-FGZ > > No stopping me now. Opps road blocked ahead.LOL > > Dave > > -- > Equine Photography > www.caughtinmotion.com > http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot

Re: Enabled

Norm Baugher wrote: >You can catch your hair on fire (unless of course you're Cotty). I disagree. I think Cotty could catch Dave's hair on fire. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Re: Enabled

You can catch your hair on fire (unless of course you're Cotty). Norm Toine wrote: > Congrats, Happy shooting, don't overheat the flash > > > On 8/16/07, David J Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I'm now the proud owner of a AF-360-FGZ >> -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.

Re: Enabled

On 8/16/07, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I disagree. I think Cotty could catch Dave's hair on fire. Biting my tongue. Biting my tongue... ;-) cheers, frank -- "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pd

Re: Enabled

At 04:47 AM 17/08/2007, frank theriault wrote: >Biting my tongue. Biting my tongue... Why mate? Doesn't that hurt? Cheers, Dave -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Re: Enabled

Margus Männik a écrit : > Sometimes "home and sick" isn't that bad at all. At least I had time for > my DA*300 I got few days ago. When I handled it first (in January) I > wasn't sure to get it - DA*60-250 sounded better for me. Now it seems > that I have to get 'em both. Yes, it will be expens

Re: Enabled

Nice shot. I like your solution. Sounds like that would work for me as well. Looks like some more seldom used equipment goes on the block. Paul -- Original message -- From: Margus Männik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sometimes "home and sick" isn't that bad at all. At lea

Re: Enabled

Very nice Margus! Looks like a very close focus. And sharp as well. Regards, Bob S. On Sat, May 3, 2008 at 5:05 PM, Margus Männik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sometimes "home and sick" isn't that bad at all. At least I had time for > my DA*300 I got few days ago. When I handled it first (in Janua

Re: Enabled

Very nice. Sharp and nice exposure givne the contrast. Is that a Prof. Einstein Daffodil? Steven Desjardins Department of Chemistry Washington and Lee University Lexington, VA 24450 (540) 458-8873 FAX: (540) 458-8878 [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> Margus Männik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 05/03/08 6:05 PM >>> So

Re: Enabled

Wow, nice flower pic. Looks like a great lens. Cheers, Christine - Original Message - From: "Margus Männik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" Sent: Saturday, May 03, 2008 5:05 PM Subject: Enabled > Sometimes "home and sick"

Re: Enabled

Hi all, yes, it's basically the minimum focussing distance. It's quite sharp even wide open and goes VERY sharp at f/6.3...f/8. I've been travelling last days (unfortunately without SLR), but hopefully this weekend I'll find some hours to spend with this lens again. BR, Margus Bob Sullivan wr

Re-enabled.

Holga's her name. $1.91 + tax was her price. Yes, she was both cheap and easy. But she's all mine. Now to shoot her. -- -- Collin Brendemuehl KC8TKA "The problems are so over-rated." -- Petula Clark --

Enabled again!

KEH still rocks, of course, but let me put in word for Charlotte Camera as an alternate source of good used gear. (No affiliation, etc., etc.) Last night received an FC-1 in 9 condition, which had been on their web page for months, and was recently marked down to $79. Why only a 9 I don't kno

Re: Enabled

RK writes: > Hi David, > Any thoughts on why Hasselblad (oops- forgot those asterisks!) is never mentioned in > the discussion re moving up to medium format? Presumably because Pentax don't make a 6x6 so we don't talk about it much on this list :) Some people swear by the square format, othe

Re: Enabled

Brian writes: > the reasons I chose the 67II are, first, it > FEELS right. I can't get used to the Box style cameras (Mamiya, > Bronica, Hasselblad) - the shutter release is a bit strange for this > former 35mm-only shooter. It does depend on how you use it. I find the RB is easiest to use h

Re: Enabled

enses were bought new had have only been used on 3 or 4 occasions. - Original Message - From: "David A. Mann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 4:51 PM Subject: Re: Enabled > Doug Brewer writes: > > > > Man, I&#

Re: Enabled

Doug Brewer wrote: > My dream set up is still the 67II and the old SMC Tak 200/4. Is that lens any good? I passed one up for $200 (Canadian, that's like $125 US or so) because I'm mostly into wides, it was older, the minimum focus was worse than the 105 f2.4, and I didn't really have a loose

Re: Enabled

DON'T DO IT! Unless you spend >$1000 each, you won't get lenses that will compare to those 6x7 Mamiya and Pentax lenses! Unless of course your old RB lenses are Pre-C, then just upgrade them. That'll be cheaper. jmnsho, Collin >From: "David A. Mann" <[EMAIL

Re: Enabled !

-- From: "Bill Owens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 3:52 AM Subject: Enabled ! > The yard sale K1000 gave me enough bodies to be enabled via trade to pick up > a MZ-S and BG-10 grip. The war department is happy since there are

Re: Enabled

- Original Message - From: "Chris Brogden Subject: Re: Enabled > On Sun, 12 Aug 2001, Aaron Reynolds wrote: > > > > My dream set up is still the 67II and the old SMC Tak 200/4. > > > > Is that lens any good? I passed one up for $200 (Canadian, that&#

Re: Enabled

On Tue, 14 Aug 2001, William Robb wrote: > Umm Chris, are you sure about that? We are talking about a > Takumar 6x7 lens, not a 35mm lens. > William Robb Oops, my bad. Thanks! :) chris - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow t

Re: Enabled

Collin Brendemuehl writes: > DON'T DO IT! > Unless you spend >$1000 each, you won't get lenses that > will compare to those 6x7 Mamiya and Pentax lenses! > Unless of course your old RB lenses are Pre-C, then > just upgrade them. That'll be cheaper. I have only ever seen one "C" RB67 lens (a so

Re: Enabled

- Original Message - From: "David A. Mann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 1:35 AM Subject: Re: Enabled > > I have only ever seen one "C" RB67 lens (a soft-focus 150mm). The good RB > glass se

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >