Antonio,
>From past experience on this and many other lists it soon degenerates into a
mud slingy match. This forum is for the discussion of photography which most
of the time does not involve much conflicting opinion. It is impossible to
have a quiet debate on any topic that involves conflict. My
"John Francis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>You know what? I don't care. I killfiled him some time ago, when
>it became apparent that the signal-to-noise ratio of his contributions
>was as close to zero as makes no difference.
Yup. 100% lossless data compression.
--
Mark Roberts
Photography
Thats a really mature position Bob. S. But given you have been one of
the prime flame throwers in this thread I am not surprised.
Antonio
On 21 May 2004, at 20:27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm getting tired of this idiot.
The man said, "...inflammatory OFF-TOPIC subjects..."
WHAT PART OF THE WORD
weekly filled with the rants of true raving maniacs.
>
> -Shawn
>
> -Original Message-
> From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, May 21, 2004 10:46 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Re: Why can't they just... was Re: Anyone still using
>
> I'm getting tired of this idiot.
>
> The man said, "...inflammatory OFF-TOPIC subjects..."
>
> WHAT PART OF THE WORD "INFLAMMATORY" DON'T YOU UNDERSTAND?
>
> Regards,
> Bob...
I'm getting tired as well.
I have a new proposal.
How about we each send him an individual reply...
EACH and EVERY ti
- Original Message -
From: "Antonio Aparicio"
Subject: [Norton AntiSpam] Re: Why can't they just... was Re: Anyone
still using windows ME
> Well Bob, calling someone an idiot is pretty inflammatory in most
> peoples book, not to mention rude.
>
Well, Antoni
aaagg
Antonio Aparicio wrote:
Shawn,
I am willing to accept that I may be wrong, but I do not feel that is
the case. The 2% figure you mention is for all computers sold in the
world - Apple has a much higher market pe
aaggghh
Antonio Aparicio wrote:
Feroze,
Why don't you take it up with the person who started the thread?
As to the international nature of the list (and I am only mentioning
it because you brought it up) I do not s
Anders Hultman wrote:
On Fri, 21 May 2004, Henri Toivonen wrote:
I wasn't allowed to, during my brief encouter with the Swedish
military. I'd have to register my camera with the higher officers and
have every picture approved for security reasons.
Was it a while ago?
Yes, it was in
On Fri, 21 May 2004, Henri Toivonen wrote:
> > I wasn't allowed to, during my brief encouter with the Swedish
> > military. I'd have to register my camera with the higher officers and
> > have every picture approved for security reasons.
>
> Was it a while ago?
Yes, it was in 1990. Fourteen ye
Anders Hultman wrote:
I wasn't allowed to, during my brief encouter with the Swedish
military. I'd have to register my camera with the higher officers and
have every picture approved for security reasons.
anders
Was it a while ago?
Cuz things certainly has changed. I'm hosting a website for a f
Antonio Aparicio wrote:
Ern,
Having followed this list for the past year without contributing my
impression was that you discussed OT topics here all the time.
A.
Yeah, you're right. Usually just long enough for everybody to climb
all over the transgressor, and make him or her feel sorry they ev
Well Bob, calling someone an idiot is pretty inflammatory in most
peoples book, not to mention rude. As to inflammatory topics, there is
no such thing. Controversial perhaps, hotly debated certainly, but not
inflammatory.
In any event, all I have done is join discussions that were already
ongo
I'm getting tired of this idiot.
The man said, "...inflammatory OFF-TOPIC subjects..."
WHAT PART OF THE WORD "INFLAMMATORY" DON'T YOU UNDERSTAND?
Regards,
Bob...
---
"No man's life, liberty or property is safe while the legislature is in
session."
-- Mark Twain
From:
Antonio:
> Having followed this list for the past year without contributing my
> impression was that you discussed OT topics here all the time.
in response to my comment:
> > Experience has shown that most members of this list do not want
> > inflammatory
> > OFF-TOPIC subjects debated HERE, ev
Ern,
Having followed this list for the past year without contributing my
impression was that you discussed OT topics here all the time.
A.
On 21 May 2004, at 14:31, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Antonio said:
As to the international nature of the list (and I am only mentioning
it
because you brought
Antonio said:
> As to the international nature of the list (and I am only mentioning it
> because you brought it up) I do not see what bearing this has on
> anything - surely in times of conflict dialogue and debate should be
> welcomed between those with differing opinions - the way the world
You can't reform a narcissist.
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Are there any mailing lists out there dedicated to dumping on
> Microsoft, praising the virtues of Linux, and generally being
> obnoxious in general?
>
> Perhaps these idiots could seek out that mailing list, go where
> p
argue this all you want, but it wont EVER change the fact that you ARE FLAT
OUT WRONG. WHEN WILL YOU UNDERSTAND??
-Shawn
-Original Message-
From: Antonio Aparicio [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 2:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Anyone still using window
Tom C wrote:
or just at least go to some other OT subject before we all die of
boredom or frustration?
Sooo.. What do you guys think about the Iraq-war? How about Bush?
/Henri
PS. It's a joke, please do not talk about politics ;-)
Bill,
Calm down man... IMO, these guys are just chattering... it should be taken
off-list, I agree. It's tedious deleteing every Windows ME thread.
Worse than Mafud? That's probably just because he'd always hand us a loaded
gun with the trigger cocked and we'd pull it to watch what happened. :
being
posted here, without invoking the dreaded censorship word.
Just curious
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: "Norm Baugher"
Subject: Re: Anyone still using windows ME
>
aaggh
h
>
>
>
> With all due respect: you are biased. You are incompletely informed. And I
> think I speak for the majority of the Pentax Discuss community when I say
> that I'm tired of seeing your digest-filling posts on this topic. You've
> ridden this horse far far too long. It's time to get off the horse
Norm, just do what I did and filter out his messages. If we ignore the
troll, he will go away...
> -Original Message-
> From: Norm Baugher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 4:05 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Anyone still u
Brian,
The 3% you refer to is for all computers - POS, servers, cash machines,
etc. etc. etc. I think you will find that in the domestic/home market
it is more like 10-15%, and in certain creative sectors more like
70-80%.
iPods made a nice profit for the company but so did desktops and
portab
aagghh
Antonio Aparicio wrote:
How many millions of users does a system need before it becomes a
worthy population would you say? There are plenty of OSX users out
there - more than enough to produce a few viruses if they wanted. All
the evidence however seems to point to the fact that it ain't easy. In
fact it is so hard th
agg
Antonio Aparicio wrote:
Here we go, more controversy I am afraid
Who wants to write a virus for such a small population? Where's the glory?
Regards,
Bob...
---
"No man's life, liberty or property is safe while the legislature is in
session."
-- Mark Twain
From: "Antonio Aparicio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> And lack of viruses.
>> On 20
Here we go, more controversy I am afraid, this time from a trade group
for executives of 150 of America's largest corporations:
"WASHINGTON (AP) -- Chief executives from some of the largest U.S.
companies are criticizing the technology industry in a lobbying
campaign, accusing them of sellin
EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 7:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Anyone still using WIndows ME?
Trolling again, Shawn?
Shawn K. wrote:
> What is a herd instinct? Where do you draw the line at being a herd
> instinct and not being a herd instinct?? For instance, wha
Please Lord, let this thread die!
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "Anders Hultman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 8:05 PM
Subject: Re: Anyone still using WIndows ME?
> On Wed, 19 May 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bob, it's a joke.
Lighten up.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "Bob Blakely"
Subject: Re: Anyone still using WIndows ME?
> Gee...
>
> I'm sorry to be living, Peter...
>
> Have a great day.
>
> Regards,
> Bob...
>
> From: "
riginal Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 6:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Anyone still using WIndows ME?
In a message dated 5/19/2004 1:53:08 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Friendly person? Either you have a hug
Image quality will suffer greatly as the digital projectors have nowhere near the
resolution of even the lowest digital camera. 1.3 Mpixels at the top end.
Nick
-Original Message-
From: "Dr. Shaun Canning"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: 19/05/04 02:21:53
If I was you Joe, I'
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 6:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Anyone still using WIndows ME?
In a message dated 5/19/2004 1:53:08 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Friendly person? Either you have a huge patience or you haven&#x
In a message dated 5/19/2004 1:53:08 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Friendly person? Either you have a huge patience or you haven't been
following the thread. ;-)
/Henri
---
I am not aware that Antonio has called anyone names. As he has been called.
In fact,
Hi ERN,
I don't think we have spoken before. Welcome to the discussion.I did
not use the term sub-standard loosely, but rather specifically in
relation to the quality of the windows OS, using additional terms such
as shoddy, poor quality etc. etc. to further illustrate my opinion. It
was someo
Please make this thread go away, please make this thread go away, please
make this thread go away
Find a happly, find a happy place, find a happy place
Antonio Aparicio wrote:
<>
>I have said all along that Windows is a sub-standard OS.
>Below an established or required standard IS poor quality in English.
Okey, Fact #1: Windows is the standard of todays workstation operating
systems.
You say: Windows is sub-standard, ie. below an established st
From: "Antonio Aparicio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 9:48 PM
Subject: Re: Anyone still using WIndows ME?
> I may have argued an opinion that has not found widespread approval
> here on this list but I believe I have no be
Shawn,
I don't think I ever asked for anyone to bend over backwards, nor do I
recognise any relentless windows bashing - I was just voicing an
opinion (admittedly strongly held), joining the debate and defending
myself from attacks from people like you. If you wanted the matter
dropped you shou
wrote:
From: "Antonio Aparicio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 9:48 PM
Subject: Re: Anyone still using WIndows ME?
I may have argued an opinion that has not found widespread approval
here on this list but I believe I have no been un
"I'm done beating this dead horse." A phrase in America that means the
conversation is over.
-Shawn
-Original Message-
From: Antonio Aparicio [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 4:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Anyone still using WIndows
Lasse Karlsson wrote:
From: "Antonio Aparicio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 9:48 PM
Subject: Re: Anyone still using WIndows ME?
I may have argued an opinion that has not found widespread approval
here on this list but I
Oh and here comes another one to join the bandwagon! As far as I am
aware subscribers to this group can post as many messages to whatever
thread I please. Had it not occurred to you that the reason I have made
so many posts is because I have been constantly bombarded by messages
that I did not
p.s. Hows about instead of asking me to "fit in" whatever that is, that
you accept and respect other peoples opinions.
Antonio
On 19 May 2004, at 21:27, Antonio Aparicio wrote:
Yeah right. You think you have not said anything unfriendly, what
about when you said:
"Would everyone please just ign
Yeah right. You think you have not said anything unfriendly, what about
when you said:
"Would everyone please just ignore him until he calms down or goes away"
or perhaps
"This is a friendly and tolerant group. Try to fit in."
You seem to enjoy throwing stones from he sidelines.
Antonio
On 19 M
w.com> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [66.95.133.170]
X-Declude-Spoolname: Db15e0e8.SMD
I have no problem with your opinions. Some of your comments
I may have argued an opinion that has not found widespread approval
here on this list but I believe I have no been unfriendly. You however
seem to have made quite a few unfriendly remarks.
Antonio
On 19 May 2004, at 18:09, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
I wish that there was no need for that, but appa
Henri,
I have said all along that Windows is a sub-standard OS. i.e. a poor
quality one. I have not changed my mind on this matter, nor have I said
otherwise. Below an established or required standard IS poor quality in
English. It was you who attempted to shift the meaning to
"non-standard", a
Antonio Aparicio wrote:
Yes. I am English and english is my first language. Born and bred in
good old London, UK. As you can see in the dictionary the main
meaning of sub-standard is below an established or required standard.
Antonio
On 19 May 2004, at 15:45, Henri Toivonen wrote:
Antonio Apari
I wish that there was no need for that, but apparently there is. Most of
the unfriendly comments have come from you, and many of the others are
in response to you.
Antonio Aparicio wrote:
I beg your pardon. There was no need for that. I was merely pointing
out to Henri that the main meaning of
Antonio Aparicio wrote:
I beg your pardon. There was no need for that. I was merely pointing out
to Henri that the main meaning of sub-standard was not as he had
understood.
As to this being a friendly group I would beg to differ with that
assertion. There appear to be some very unfriendly peo
I beg your pardon. There was no need for that. I was merely pointing
out to Henri that the main meaning of sub-standard was not as he had
understood.
As to this being a friendly group I would beg to differ with that
assertion. There appear to be some very unfriendly people here from
what I hav
Yes. I am English and english is my first language. Born and bred in
good old London, UK. As you can see in the dictionary the main meaning
of sub-standard is below an established or required standard.
Antonio
On 19 May 2004, at 15:45, Henri Toivonen wrote:
Antonio Aparicio wrote:
Hi Henri, not
BW> I suspect that if you did a poll the overwhelming majority of
BW> those people would know perfectly well what the English plural of
BW> 'box' is, but continue to say 'boxen' for nerdy jargon reasons.
"I have a herd of boxen to care for"
from Ox, pl. Oxen
Best regards,
Frantisek Vlcek
On May 19, 2004, at 9:49 PM, Winston wrote:
In my defense, I use my photoshop machine mostly for playing games
though :(
That's OK; I may use my Photoshop machine for Photoshop, but I also use
my scanning machine for games :)
But hey, at least we have something in common - I use a G5 toofrom
Wednesday, May 19, 2004, 12:41:47 AM, graywolf wrote:
g> Golly, that will virus wipe a bunch of hard drives, won't it?
>>
>> This email contains the HONOR SYSTEM virus. Send ten copies of this message
>> to your friends and then reformat your hard drive.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Bob...
I wouldn't joke a
Hi Antonio,
I was expecting that you would read the following paragraph in that article
in response to your query why Mac is usually spared for virus attack which
is very rampant in Windows machine. Never mind on OS/X security hole etc.
"Typically, people write exploits and other forms of malici
]
Subject: Re: Photoshop Machine (Was RE: Anyone still using windows ME)
On May 19, 2004, at 11:30 AM, Winston wrote:
> Gosh, I would not pay the cost of G5 for the speed it offers.
Neither would I... not in this country anyway.
OTOH Virginia Tech got a pretty good bang for their bucks.
On May 19, 2004, at 11:30 AM, Winston wrote:
Gosh, I would not pay the cost of G5 for the speed it offers.
Neither would I... not in this country anyway.
OTOH Virginia Tech got a pretty good bang for their bucks. But that's
not exactly a Photoshop machine :)
Cheers,
- Dave (a G5 owner)
http://ww
Hello, nice to meet you too. The link you posted is to a know issue
with DLling dodgly .dmg files (like .Zip files). Basically if you set
your browser to auto open them after DL there is a potential security
risk as you could be unzipping a dodgy piece of software - of course
for it to do a
Because flaws in software go beyond the blatantly obvious...
-Shawn
-Original Message-
From: Antonio Aparicio [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2004 5:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Anyone still using windows ME
Really, I didn't know that. Interesting. S
On 5/18/04 5:53 PM, "Antonio Aparicio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Really, I didn't know that. Interesting. So how come Windows is still
> so vulnerable to virus attacks?
Hi Antonio,
Nice to meet you (on the list :-).
This might help you understand what's going on in each OS?
http://maccentra
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2004 2:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Anyone still using windows ME
Shawn, you cannot install any software on OSX unless you enter the
Admin password - therefore by design a virus cannot install and run
itself which is the big problem with Windows.
Antonio
On 18 May 200
it only means you don't know how to.
Herb...
- Original Message -
From: "Antonio Aparicio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2004 2:52 PM
Subject: Re: Anyone still using windows ME
> Shawn, you cannot install any softwa
ge-
From: Antonio Aparicio [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2004 11:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Anyone still using windows ME
Well OSX runs just fine on my G4 1 gig. Do you own a Mac? Nobody said
OSX was 64 bit either. As far as I am aware the new G5 chips are 64
"people are stupid" ... you did now.. :)
Tom C.
From: Bob W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OT: Eliminating 'virii' ( was Re: Anyone still using windows ME
Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 22:59:55 +0100
Hi,
> But hey, I a
ing 'virii' ( was Re: Anyone still using
windows ME
Bob W wrote:
>Hi,
>
>
>
>
>>This has actually nothing to do with regular languages. It's just
>>computer lingo. The jargon of nerds, if you will.
>>
>>
>
>I doubt that.
>
>
>
Hi,
> But hey, I agree with you that people are stupid and say stuff wrong
> because they are ignorant.
I did not say people are stupid.
--
Cheers,
Bob
Bob W wrote:
Hi,
This has actually nothing to do with regular languages. It's just
computer lingo. The jargon of nerds, if you will.
I doubt that.
As another example, one unix, several unices. And several boxes running
a unix version is often referred to as "boxen".
It's nerd jargo
4 22:52:04
To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: Anyone still using Windows ME?
KEEP DREAMING!!! The whole point of 35mm was convenience, convenience, and
more convenience. Digital out does the convenience factor by about a
hundred miles.
>
> You can set up windows to do the same thing Antonio.
>
> -Shawn
Give it up, Shawn. You can't convince him with facts
that don't match his pre-determined prejudices.
Hi,
> This has actually nothing to do with regular languages. It's just
> computer lingo. The jargon of nerds, if you will.
I doubt that.
> As another example, one unix, several unices. And several boxes running
> a unix version is often referred to as "boxen".
It's nerd jargon if they know t
In a message dated 5/17/2004 12:32:31 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Check out AVG. http://www.grisoft.com/us/us_dwnl_free.php
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Marnie aka Doe :-) I used McAffe at first when it was new on this machine
> (under ME), then it expired. So I removed it
, May 18, 2004 1:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Anyone still using windows ME
Ok, I am open to being wrong. Could yo point me to some examples?
Antonio
On 18 May 2004, at 18:58, John Francis wrote:
"As far as I am aware there is no spy-ware nor viruses on OSX. I
believe
that is by desig
ndows,
and some releases are even more insecure. And that my friends is pretty
bad. I prefer windows, it works, and it works everytime.
-Shawn
-Original Message-
From: Christian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2004 2:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Anyone still u
Antonio Aparicio [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2004 1:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Anyone still using windows ME
Ok, I am open to being wrong. Could yo point me to some examples?
Antonio
On 18 May 2004, at 18:58, John Francis wrote:
>>
>> "As
- Original Message -
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Antonio Aparicio" Subject: Re: Anyone still using windows ME
>
>
> > What happened, did I run into a room full of Microsoft shareholder
William Robb writes:
> Maybe it's because those of us who have been on this list
> for several years are tired of this particular discussion
> coming up a couple of times a year.
Yup!
And God help us if the other Bob wakes up! He doesn't tolerate fools meekly.
I hope his son is doing well.
; From: Antonio Aparicio [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2004 12:07 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Anyone still using windows ME
>
>
> Well OSX runs just fine on my G4 1 gig. Do you own a Mac? Nobody said
> OSX was 64 bit either. As far as I am aware th
8, 2004 12:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Anyone still using windows ME
Well OSX runs just fine on my G4 1 gig. Do you own a Mac? Nobody said
OSX was 64 bit either. As far as I am aware the new G5 chips are 64 bit
but OSX isn't yet. As to price I think you are wrong, a similarly
ge-
From: Antonio Aparicio [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2004 11:25 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Anyone still using windows ME
I don't need to. I also use Mac OSX, which is virus free and works like
a dream come true. But that doesnt mean that I should not be
dissatisfie
--
From: Antonio Aparicio [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2004 11:25 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Anyone still using windows ME
I don't need to. I also use Mac OSX, which is virus free and works like
a dream come true. But that doesnt mean that I should not be
dis
world standard in computing? I think they should be doing
betterl, a lot better.
Antonio
On 18 May 2004, at 17:17, Bill Owens wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Antonio Aparicio" Subject: Re: Anyone still using windows ME
What happened, did I run into a room full of Microsoft s
Well why did you contribute to it then? I ignore threads I am not
interested in - it is quite easy.
Antonio
On 18 May 2004, at 17:02, William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Antonio Aparicio" Subject: Re: Anyone still using windows ME
What happened, did I run into a ro
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Antonio Aparicio" Subject: Re: Anyone still using windows ME
>
>
> > What happened, did I run into a room full of Microsoft shareholders or
> > something? All I said was that Windows was a substandard operating
&g
What happened, did I run into a room full of Microsoft shareholders or
something? All I said was that Windows was a substandard operating
system and that it was riddled with viruses and spyware and that we the
users deserved better, especially given the money the company makes.
Antonio
On 18 Ma
tonio Aparicio"
Subject: Re: Anyone still using WIndows ME?
Hi Cotty,
I doubt it. There will be an SLR rennaisance at some point no doubt. My
fingers would be crossed for an anniversary LX.
Nikon and Canon have both stated that they are getting out of the film SLR
game entirely. Konica may keep
- Original Message -
From: "Antonio Aparicio"
Subject: Re: Anyone still using WIndows ME?
> Hello Henri,
>
> I have stated my opnions quite clearly and openly - and defended them
> in the debate. I do not beleive I have baited anyone here nor have I
> mad
- Original Message -
From: "Antonio Aparicio"
Subject: Re: Anyone still using WIndows ME?
> Hi Cotty,
>
> I doubt it. There will be an SLR rennaisance at some point no doubt. My
> fingers would be crossed for an anniversary LX.
>
Nikon and Canon have both sta
*ist 35mm?
"The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true." -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "pentax list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Anyone still usi
d
and surpassed 35mm film. Its done for, there will be no resurgence.
-Shawn
-Original Message-
From: Antonio Aparicio [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 17, 2004 5:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Anyone still using WIndows ME?
Hi Cotty,
I doubt it. There will be an SLR
Antonio said:
> Or have debates in which everyone shares the same opinion, and where
> nobody really wants to say anything that is going to be different.
in response, I think, to:
> > The key on this list is to NEVER bring up the subject of computer
> > operating
> > systems.
> > Christian
The
Hello Henri,
I have stated my opnions quite clearly and openly - and defended them
in the debate. I do not beleive I have baited anyone here nor have I
made any outrageous comments, such that would deserve the "troll"
label.
Antonio
On 17 May 2004, at 23:38, Henri Toivonen wrote:
Antonio Apari
Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>So anyway, looks like the MZ-S will be the last ever Pentax film SLR.
Nah. The entry-level ZX-60 and mid-level *ist (film) came after the
MZ-S. *They'll* be the last film SLRs from Pentax.
The MZ-S is destined for classic status, though. Truly a gem and bit
diff
On Mon, 17 May 2004, Cotty wrote:
> So anyway, looks like the MZ-S will be the last ever Pentax film SLR.
* ist (not the *ist D) came out after the MZ-S by a couple of years,
didn't it?
alex
Will I see there is finally a new version (May 4, 04), but I had the most
current version before that. I've downloaded 0.6, and will install it today.
Thanks for the heads up. I do consider you lucky however if you never had it
crash on you.
--
Henri Toivonen wrote:
graywolf wrote:
Interesting
So anyway, looks like the MZ-S will be the last ever Pentax film SLR.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|www.macads.co.uk/snaps
_
1 - 100 of 155 matches
Mail list logo
