Re: Introduction (Raw work flow)

> Sorry, but that's not true. I know the difference between Bayer > interpolation and gamma-encoding. And gamma-encoding is not "simply > applying a logrithmic function" to the data before quantizing. It's a > mite bit more involved than that, although it presents a first order > approximation. > >

Re: Introduction (Raw work flow)

On Jan 8, 2007, at 6:59 AM, Cory Papenfuss wrote: > If you haven't already, you might want to take a read of this > guy's rantings on linear vs. gamma errors. The color management > part of > it is different from "gamma errors." > http://www.aim-dtp.net/aim/evaluation/gie/index.htm This

Re: Introduction (Raw work flow)

>> If you haven't already, you might want to take a read of this >> guy's rantings on linear vs. gamma errors. The color management >> part of >> it is different from "gamma errors." >> http://www.aim-dtp.net/aim/evaluation/gie/index.htm > > This guy is using Photoshop 6. Which means he's not

Re: Introduction (Raw work flow)

- Original Message - From: "Cory Papenfuss" Subject: Re: Introduction (Raw work flow) >> > I don't thing Photoshop deals with RAW images anyway, does it? A > RAW image doesn't even make sense until it's been interpolated into RGB. > Anyway,

Re: Introduction (Raw work flow)

On Jan 9, 2007, at 12:52 PM, Cory Papenfuss wrote: > I don't thing Photoshop deals with RAW images anyway, does it? A > RAW image doesn't even make sense until it's been interpolated into > RGB. > Anyway, as usual I care little... just having a good ol' fashioned > pedantic discussion...

Re: Introduction (Raw work flow)

Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: > Pedantry does not produce photographs. MARK! ;-) -- Christian http://photography.skofteland.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Re: Introduction (Raw work flow)

On 10/01/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Not all of us are interested in theoretical pedantry. Mark! Two quotes out of the one post, impressive. -- Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distud

Re: Introduction (Raw work flow)

> The problem, Cory, is that the question I was responding to, and > subsequent discussion, was a bona fide question by a new user on how > best to work with his K10D RAW image files. Not all of us are > interested in theoretical pedantry. > My bad... I don't recall the original inquiry. I

Re: Introduction (Raw work flow)

- Original Message - From: "Cory Papenfuss" Subject: Re: Introduction (Raw work flow) > > I am cursed by the fact that I do not trust my own preference for > "pleasing/accurate," You need to look at more good pictures then. Not necessarily phot

Re: Introduction (Raw work flow)

On Jan 9, 2007, at 5:44 PM, Cory Papenfuss wrote: > ... I am quite in the minority as a "technical photographer" as > opposed to an "artsy photographer." Most are the latter and whatever > looks good is acceptable. I find it difficult to trust my own > sense of > quality, so I resort to objec

Re: Introduction (Raw work flow)

Agreed. For example, I find it useless in most situations to try to reproduce the exact temperature of the light. For some shots, I want a warm look, for others, something colder. What the finished photographs communicates is the important element. To me, what was really there is insignificant.

Re: Introduction (Raw work flow)

On 10/01/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That's not photography, that's creating a recording of a subject. You > have to learn to trust your eyes and aesthetics, and develop the > ability to see, to do photography. Wow, I didn't realize that this was the case. -- Rob Studdert

Re: Introduction (Raw work flow)

William Robb wrote: >You need to look at more good pictures then. >Not necessarily photographs either. Great advice! I'm very fortunate to live within walking distance of a good art museum (the Carnegie) and I find looking at paintings to be quite instructive. They had an exhibit of Hudson Rive

Re: Introduction (Raw work flow)

And how did you, or do you, deal with B&W? Youir comments suggest that you're not a photographer but some kind of technician. Shel > > Cory Papenfuss wrote: >... I am quite in the minority as a > "technical photographer" as > opposed to an "artsy photographer." > Most are the latter and

Re: Introduction (Raw work flow)

> And how did you, or do you, deal with B&W? > Occasionally. > Youir comments suggest that you're not a photographer but some kind of > technician. > > Shel I may have overstated my position somewhat, but I personally find endless tweaking on the computer irritating and circuitou

Re: Introduction (Raw work flow)

On 11/01/07, Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And how did you, or do you, deal with B&W? > > Youir comments suggest that you're not a photographer but some kind of > technician. I'm a bit confused and surprised at some of the comments relating to Cory's posts. Whether somebody is making

Re: Introduction (Raw work flow)

- Original Message - From: "Digital Image Studio" Subject: Re: Introduction (Raw work flow) > On 11/01/07, Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> And how did you, or do you, deal with B&W? >> >> Youir comments suggest that you're not

Re: Introduction (Raw work flow)

On Jan 10, 2007, at 5:56 AM, Cory Papenfuss wrote: > I may have overstated my position somewhat, but I personally find > endless tweaking on the computer irritating and circuitous. My > "photography" style ends as it did when shot film... once the > shutter is > pressed. All of the technical (

Re: Introduction (Raw work flow)

On Jan 10, 2007, at 6:23 AM, William Robb wrote: >> I'm a bit confused and surprised at some of the comments relating to >> Cory's posts. Whether somebody is making photographs to create art or >> records surely they are still a photographer if they control how or >> what is being photographed? >

Re: Introduction (Raw work flow)

Well, let me then amend my post: I think he's more a technician than a photographer concerned with the aesthetics and creativity involved in photographing a subject. I believe Mr.Papanfuss has stated that as well, at least to some degree. Further - and this just may be me - I don't recall ever se

Re: Introduction (Raw work flow)

Watch out here as an elitist snob... I have been very careful to qualify any of my potentially denigrating comments WRT "photographer" vs. "technician." I personally think of it as the difference between a "technical photographer" and an "artsy photographer." I am very much the former

Re: Introduction (Raw work flow)

; inquired if they were for sale! These were highly abstract images of fracture surfaces of some automotive components. Kenneth Waller - Original Message - From: "Cory Papenfuss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Introduction (Raw work flow) > Watch out here as

Re: Introduction (Raw work flow)

ROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" >Subject: Re: Introduction (Raw work flow) >Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:16:59 -0500 > >Interesting. > >I consider myself a photographer - period. Although I tend to enjoy nature >

RE: Introduction (Raw work flow)

PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom C Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 4:09 PM To: pdml@pdml.net Subject: Re: Introduction (Raw work flow) My turn to say "Interesting". Ever since I really got seriously interested in photography, in the late 80's, I've felt it was a great melding

Re: Introduction (Raw work flow)

This could certainly be an interesting discussion. I'm sure we could categorize types of photos and the skills needed for them. Also, we could go so far as to say that the more technical skill you have, the better off you are. However, without some artistic skill, photos can be less interesting.

Re: Introduction (Raw work flow)

On 11/01/07, Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, let me then amend my post: I think he's more a technician than a > photographer concerned with the aesthetics and creativity involved in > photographing a subject. I believe Mr.Papanfuss has stated that as well, > at least to some degr

RE: Introduction (Raw work flow)

> > On 11/01/07, Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > And how did you, or do you, deal with B&W? > > > > Youir comments suggest that you're not a photographer but > some kind of > > technician. > > I'm a bit confused and surprised at some of the comments relating to > Cory's posts. Whet

Re: Introduction (Raw work flow)

On 10/1/07, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed: >This looks set fair to be another lot of nonsense about definitions. Define 'definitions' ;-) -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com _ -- PDML

Re: Introduction (Raw work flow)

Let's put it more bluntly, this is a Pentax Camera list. The photography techniques are somewhat off-topic, and the photo-aesthetic stuff is completely off topic and actually belongs on some other list. The PDML has always been very tolerant of off-topic posts, but the suggestion that the on-to

Re: Introduction (Raw work flow)

Where and when was that suggested, and by whom? Shel > [Original Message] > From: graywolf > Let's put it more bluntly, this is a Pentax Camera list. The photography > techniques are somewhat off-topic, and the photo-aesthetic stuff is > completely off topic and actually belongs on some oth

Re: Introduction (Raw work flow)

I thought this was a Pentax and all things photo related list. (I'm going to take out an insurance policy on my camera before I take a picture of my gun wrapped in a Canadian flag) Norm graywolf wrote: > Let's put it more bluntly, this is a Pentax Camera list. The photography > techniques a

RE: Introduction (Raw work flow)

re a year and a half. Tim Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of graywolf Sent: 11. januar 2007 16:24 To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: Introduction (Raw work flow) Let's put it more bluntly

Re: Introduction (Raw work flow)

On 11/1/07, Tim Øsleby, discombobulated, unleashed: >Correct me if I'm wrong. I've only been here a year and a half. Wow, seems more like ten. > ;-) -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com

Re: Introduction (Raw work flow)

On Jan 11, 2007, at 12:50 PM, Cotty wrote: >> Correct me if I'm wrong. I've only been here a year and a half. > Wow, seems more like ten. ... [ka ching!] I've been here two years but I think it's aged me ten. Those who have been here for 8 years are probably over one hundred now, it's an e^x

RE: Introduction (Raw work flow)

> Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian) > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of > graywolf > Sent: 11. januar 2007 16:24 > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Re: Introduction (Raw work flow) > > Let&#

Re: Introduction (Raw work flow)

On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 08:50:42PM +, Cotty wrote: > On 11/1/07, Tim ?sleby, discombobulated, unleashed: > > >Correct me if I'm wrong. I've only been here a year and a half. > > Wow, seems more like ten. Only if you count in dog years ... -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net htt

Re: Introduction: New to PDML

- Original Message - From: "Steven Desjardins" To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" Sent: Sunday, December 19, 2010 2:39 PM Subject: Re: Introduction: New to PDML Nice collection primes. I'll have to check out the site. This is a relaxed email list; we'

Re: Introduction: New to PDML

Relaxed? To paraphrase Rick*, "You were misinformed." *Casablanca. On 12/19/2010 2:45 PM, Andrew Allen wrote: Hello everyone, my name is Andy. I've heard great things about PDML for awhile and figured I'd join up. I shoot a Pz-1p SLR and

Re: Introduction: New to PDML

, December 19, 2010 2:39 PM > Subject: Re: Introduction: New to PDML > > >> Nice collection primes.  I'll have to check out the site.  This is a >> relaxed email list; we're mostly old guys that drink heavily. > > > And there are a few young women on the list wh

Re: Introduction: New to PDML

- Original Message - From: "Steven Desjardins" To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" Sent: Sunday, December 19, 2010 11:27 PM Subject: Re: Introduction: New to PDML The longer you're on the list, Christine, the better your grumpy old guy impression gets. Now Ste

Re: Introduction: New to PDML

On 12/19/2010 9:45 PM, Andrew Allen wrote: Hello everyone, my name is Andy. I've heard great things about PDML for awhile and figured I'd join up. I shoot a Pz-1p SLR and a Pentax K-5 - all genuine Pentax AF primes at this point. DA15, FA*24, FA31, FA43, and DA*55 at the moment (clearly I'm mo

Re: Introduction: New to PDML

On 20 December 2010 06:45, Andrew Allen wrote: > Hello everyone, my name is Andy.  I've heard great things about PDML > for awhile and figured I'd join up.  I shoot a Pz-1p SLR and a Pentax > K-5 - all genuine Pentax AF primes at this point.  DA15, FA*24, FA31, > FA43, and DA*55 at the moment (cle

Re: Introduction: New to PDML

Hi Andy On Dec 19, 2010, at 11:45 AM, Andrew Allen wrote: > Hello everyone, my name is Andy. I've heard great things about PDML > for awhile and figured I'd join up. I shoot a Pz-1p SLR and a Pentax > K-5 - all genuine Pentax AF primes at this point. DA15, FA*24, FA31, > FA43, and DA*55 at the

Re: Introduction: New to PDML

On Dec 20, 2010, at 6:25 AM, Larry Colen wrote: > Hi Andy > > On Dec 19, 2010, at 11:45 AM, Andrew Allen wrote: > >> Hello everyone, my name is Andy. I've heard great things about PDML >> for awhile and figured I'd join up. I shoot a Pz-1p SLR and a Pentax >> K-5 - all genuine Pentax AF prime

Re: Introduction: New to PDML

Hi Andy, Welcome. Don't believe anything Cotty says. Regards, Bob S. On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 4:14 AM, Rob Studdert wrote: > On 20 December 2010 06:45, Andrew Allen wrote: >> Hello everyone, my name is Andy.  I've heard great things about PDML >> for awhile and figured I'd join up.  I shoot a P

Re: Introduction: New to PDML

I found North Carolina at high altitude a nice place to drink. Mark! Ted "The eye of the viewer becomes the eye of the Photographer." Albert Maysles -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit th

Re: Introduction: New to PDML

On Dec 19, 2010, at 3:39 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote: > This is a relaxed email list; we're mostly old guys that drink heavily. > I resemble that remark! stan -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please

Re: Introduction: New to PDML

On Dec 20, 2010, at 4:09 AM, paul stenquist wrote: > > On Dec 20, 2010, at 6:25 AM, Larry Colen wrote: > >> Hi Andy >> >> On Dec 19, 2010, at 11:45 AM, Andrew Allen wrote: >> >>> Hello everyone, my name is Andy. I've heard great things about PDML >>> for awhile and figured I'd join up. I sh

Re: Introduction: New to PDML

On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Stan Halpin wrote: > > On Dec 19, 2010, at 3:39 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote: > >>  This is a relaxed email list; we're mostly old guys that drink heavily. >> > > I resemble that remark! Burp Dave > > stan > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net >

Re: Introduction: New to PDML

On Dec 20, 2010, at 12:32 AM, Boris Liberman wrote: > On 12/19/2010 9:45 PM, Andrew Allen wrote: >> Hello everyone, my name is Andy. I've heard great things about PDML >> for awhile and figured I'd join up. I shoot a Pz-1p SLR and a Pentax >> K-5 - all genuine Pentax AF primes at this point. D

Re: Introduction: New to PDML

On 12/20/2010 10:29 PM, Larry Colen wrote: Boris, you may be amused to know that that is how the apache webserver got its name. -- Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est It is hard to be amused by something you already knew /wink wink/. Boris -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.

Re: Introduction: New to PDML

On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 3:45 AM, Andrew Allen wrote: > Hello everyone, my name is Andy.  I've heard great things about PDML > for awhile and figured I'd join up.  I shoot a Pz-1p SLR and a Pentax > K-5 - all genuine Pentax AF primes at this point.  DA15, FA*24, FA31, > FA43, and DA*55 at the momen

Re: Introduction: New to PDML

2010/12/21 Bong Manayon : > > Hi Andy, > > Welcome from the Philippines...! > > Bong Hi Andy, further to your hit from the Bong, here's a warm welcome from Old Europe, too. I'm one of the chicken little cranky K10D owners. 40 is considered barely post-teen here ]=) Nice work on your site, too. Che

Re: Introduction: New to PDML

Steven Desjardins wrote: Nice collection primes. I'll have to check out the site. This is a relaxed email list; we're mostly old guys that drink heavily. Correction... "some of the old guys drink heavily" some of the old broads don't drink at all. Don't want you to think there are no women

Re: Introduction: New to PDML

On Dec 20, 2010, at 9:34 PM, Boris Liberman wrote: > On 12/20/2010 10:29 PM, Larry Colen wrote: >> Boris, you may be amused to know that that is how the apache >> webserver got its name. >> >> -- Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est > > It is hard to be amused by something you already k

Re: Introduction: New to PDML

We aim to please, sometimes we miss... /big grin/ On 12/21/2010 11:18 PM, Larry Colen wrote: But I know you, and am constantly amused. -- Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE

Re: Introduction: New to PDML

On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 4:18 PM, Larry Colen wrote: > > On Dec 20, 2010, at 9:34 PM, Boris Liberman wrote: > >> On 12/20/2010 10:29 PM, Larry Colen wrote: >>> Boris, you may be amused to know that that is how the apache >>> webserver got its name. >>> >>> -- Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from

Re: Introduction: New to PDML

Welcome, Andrew (Andy?). Looking forward to seeing your work. Your site denied me access, but I'm not taking it personally at this point.;)) Jack --- On Sun, 12/19/10, Andrew Allen wrote: > From: Andrew Allen > Subject: Introduction: New to PDML > To: pdml@pdml.net > Date: Sunday, December 19

Re: Introduction: New to PDML

I just took out everything after .com and it worked.. - Mensaje original > De: Jack Davis > Para: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Enviado: dom,19 diciembre, 2010 20:53 > Asunto: Re: Introduction: New to PDML > > Welcome, Andrew (Andy?). Looking forward to seeing yo

Re: Introduction with fixed link ...

G'day Andy. Welcome. You've got a nice looking website there and, on my brief look around, it's apparent that you have an eye for the unusual - some great shots of subjects that I probably wouldn't have given a second look. By the way, if you wonder about the various acronyms that appear on the

Re: Introduction: New to PDML

Welcome aboard, Andy. Some very nice work on your site. I f you heard nice things about us, they were probably lies, but we're at least okay most of the time:-). It is true that we con't have a lot of chicken littles here, so that's a plus. Looking forward to seeing more and hearing more from yo

Re: Introduction: New to PDML

Nice collection primes. I'll have to check out the site. This is a relaxed email list; we're mostly old guys that drink heavily. On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Andrew Allen wrote: > Hello everyone, my name is Andy.  I've heard great things about PDML > for awhile and figured I'd join up.  I s

Re: Introduction: New to PDML

I took a quick look. I'm a big fan of texture and geometry, so no surprise that i like your stuff. I particularly like colors and contrasts. do you do much post processing or is that just the colors of your world? On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Andrew Allen wrote: > Hello everyone, my name i

Re: Introduction with fixed link ...

Welcome Andrew. Some nice photos there. Dave On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 3:12 PM, Andrew Allen wrote: > Some strange formatting issues going on with that intro post ... try > andrewallenphoto.com (nothing after the .com).  Glad to see a few > DA*55 users here as well. > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss M

Re: Introduction: New to PDML

Got it! Nice site Andrew! A lot of very well done images. Site doesn't appear to be at all "patchy." (?) Jack --- On Sun, 12/19/10, Jack Davis wrote: > From: Jack Davis > Subject: Re: Introduction: New to PDML > To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" > Date

Re: Introduction: New to PDML

of very well done images. > Site doesn't appear to be at all "patchy." (?) > > Jack > > --- On Sun, 12/19/10, Jack Davis wrote: > >> From: Jack Davis >> Subject: Re: Introduction: New to PDML >> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" >> Date:

Re: Introduction: New to PDML

Welcome, Andy! I enjoyed looking through your work! I've had the same experience you've had regarding the overall pace of the forums as opposed to what goes on here. As I see it, I can go anywhere and be called an idiot, so I figure I might as well confine it to a more tight-knit circle.

Re: Introduction: New to PDML

We can have a cranky, bohemian K7 fringe. On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 5:59 PM, Walter Gilbert wrote: >  Welcome, Andy!  I enjoyed looking through your work!  I've had the same > experience you've had regarding the overall pace of the forums as opposed to > what goes on here.  As I see it, I can go an

Re: Introduction: New to PDML

- Mensaje original > De: Walter Gilbert > Welcome, Andy! I enjoyed looking through your work! I've had the same >experience you've had regarding the overall pace of the forums as opposed to >what goes on here. As I see it, I can go anywhere and be called an idiot, so >I >figur

Re: Introduction: New to PDML

On 19/12/10, Andrew Allen, discombobulated, unleashed: >  I've heard great things about PDML >for awhile and figured I'd join up. Hey Frank, I got a mention in dispatches ;-) Welcome Andrew. -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche -- http://www.c

Re: Introduction: New to PDML

Welcome to the group! On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Andrew Allen wrote: > Hello everyone, my name is Andy.  I've heard great things about PDML > for awhile and figured I'd join up.  I shoot a Pz-1p SLR and a Pentax > K-5 - all genuine Pentax AF primes at this point.  DA15, FA*24, FA31, > FA43,

Re: Introduction: New to PDML

Oooh ... and a fellow Missourian to boot! ;;-) On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Andrew Allen wrote: > Hello everyone, my name is Andy.  I've heard great things about PDML > for awhile and figured I'd join up.  I shoot a Pz-1p SLR and a Pentax > K-5 - all genuine Pentax AF primes at this point.  D

Re: Introduction: New to PDML

Welcome aboard. Nice work seen on your site but I didn't see the obligatory comorant! Kenneth Waller http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller - Original Message - From: "Andrew Allen" Subject: Introduction: New to PDML Hello everyone, my name is Andy. I've heard great things

Re: Introduction: New to PDML

Kenneth Waller http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller - Original Message - From: "Nick David Wright" Subject: Re: Introduction: New to PDML Oooh ... and a fellow Missourian to boot! ;;-) Yeah, show me. Spent 3 pretty good years in St. Charles. Really liked

Re: Introduction (and re-de-lurking)

Hi Nicole and welcome Good to see a bit of 'new blood' here - particularly female. We're basically a bunch of sad old farts - with a few exceptions (you know who you are!) - and we could do with a bit of livening up. Christine does her best... Cheers Brian ++ B

Re: Introduction (and re-de-lurking)

Brian Walters wrote: Hi Nicole and welcome Good to see a bit of 'new blood' here - particularly female. We're basically a bunch of sad old farts - with a few exceptions (you know who you are!) - and we could do with a bit of livening up. Christine does her best... Careful, Nicole is traveli

Re: Introduction (and re-de-lurking)

It seems you got through before Larry's forwarded message. Congratulations, you've been awarded a special 1 year free premium membership, with platinum colored perks. Just be sure to tip the cormorant on your way in or out. On 2/17/2016 6:00 PM, Nicole Jacque wrote: Hello, all! After de-lu

Re: Introduction (and re-de-lurking)

Every time I see the 'cormorant' on Larry's t-shirt, I do a double take, because it looks like a race track map to me... Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 17, 2016, at 4:04 PM, P.J. Alling wrote: > > It seems you got through before Larry's forwarded message. Congratulations, > you've been awarded

Re: Introduction (and re-de-lurking)

Nicole Jacque wrote: >Every time I see the 'cormorant' on Larry's t-shirt, I do a double take, >because it looks like a race track map to me... Ooh. Which track? (Former racer here.) -- Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia www.robertstech.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pd

Re: Introduction (and re-de-lurking)

It doesn't look like any particular track that I know of, which is why the first time that I saw it, I spent forever trying to figure out what track it might be, because I didn't recognize it. I race the most at Thunderhill, Laguna Seca, and Sears Point. But I've also raced at Buttonwillow, Pac

Re: Introduction (and re-de-lurking)

Hi Nicole! Big Welcome to PDML! There's another Christine on the list, and she's from Boston. I'm Chicago Christine. Looking forward to getting to know you through your words and photos! Cheers, Christine Sent from my iPad > On Feb 17, 2016, at 5:00 PM, Nicole Jacque wrote: > > Hello, all!

Re: Introduction (and re-de-lurking)

Hi Nicole! Welcome to the PDML! I didn't know that you were a photo head as well as a motor head! See you around the fruit farm! G > On Feb 17, 2016, at 11:56 PM, Christine Aguila wrote: > > Hi Nicole! > Big Welcome to PDML! > There's another Christine on the list, and she's from Boston. I'

Re: Introduction (and re-de-lurking)

Make sure whatever email program you're using is set to send "plain text only", and you have to be sending from the email address you used to subscribe. Those are the two problems that seem to occur most often sending list messages. And, Welcome Aboard! On 2/17/2016 6:00 PM, Nicole Jacque wrote:

Re: Introduction (and re-de-lurking)

On 2/17/2016 7:03 PM, Larry Colen wrote: Brian Walters wrote: Hi Nicole and welcome Good to see a bit of 'new blood' here - particularly female. We're basically a bunch of sad old farts - with a few exceptions (you know who you are!) - and we could do with a bit of livening up. Christine doe

Re: Introduction to ME, continued.....8-)

Well, you have a better eye than me. All the best up the coast. Aussi Pommy Paul - Original Message - From: "Tanya & Russell Mayer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 2:24 PM Subject: Introduction to ME, continued.8-) > Continued from first

Re: Introduction to ME, continued.....8-)

Welcome to the list. Enjoy it as much as possible. Alex Tanya & Russell Mayer wrote: > > Continued from first message > > I have some stuff posted on photo.net and here are the links, if anyone is > > Thanks in advance, and it is nice to me among other people who believe that > Pentax is

Re: Introduction to ME, continued.....8-)

On Wed, 21 Mar 2001 13:24:23 +1000, Tanya & Russell Mayer wrote: >my first query >is in regards to the Pz-20. Is anybody familiar with this model (I believe >that it was released in '94 and >discontinued in '95)? I know that it is only a fairly basic model, but I >have had one offered to me for

Re: Introduction to ME, continued.....8-)

I am so glad the photos obviously weren't taken with the camera for auction :) > I could barely breath! There is also a really nice > PZ-1p for auction if > anybody is interested: > > http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1223556713 ___

RE: Introduction, DA*55 and my Processing

Very nice to be welcomed by all of you; I see Godfrey posts here and I'm happy to say he provided some early inspiration to me as I learned to love Pentax prime glass (like many others I've owned lots and lots of primes and have consolidated my kit to the most utilitarian form i can). RE: Old men

Re: Introduction and MZ-S data imprinting question

Hi Tim, on 23 Sep 02 you wrote in pentax.list: >First of all, being new here, I'd Just like to say hello =) Welcome! >The imnprinting seems to be surrounded by a sort of 'halo' or smudge which >tends to make it very difficult to read. Is this normal, or has my >camera got some sort of fault in

Re: Introduction and MZ-S data imprinting question

Tim wrote: > The imnprinting seems to be surrounded by a sort of 'halo' or smudge which > tends to make it very difficult to read. Is this normal, or has my > camera got some sort of fault in the imprinting device? Mine does not have a halo. It's very easy to read. Try a different film to make

Re: Introduction and MZ-S data imprinting question

Mine has that "halo", but only on negative film; on transparency film it's perfectly sharp. -- Kristian On Monday, Sep 23, 2002, at 19:11 Europe/Dublin, Pål Jensen wrote: > Tim wrote: > >> The imnprinting seems to be surrounded by a sort of 'halo' or smudge >> which >> tends to make it very

Re: Introduction and MZ-S data imprinting question

You can change the density of the data imprinting with one of the Pentax Functions. I haven't changed mine, so I don't know if you'll get rid of the so-called 'halo'. As for me, I use a good loupe to view that data if need beit's easy with magnification, but definitely more difficult without

RE: Introduction and MZ-S data imprinting question

Welcome Tim - this can be a really good group, if a little intense at times! For your problem, set the data imprinting intensity, function 15, at a lower level - I have mine set to 3 at the moment, and for 400ASA film this is too high. Basically, the data imprinting led's are creating flare i

RE: Introduction and MZ-S data imprinting question

Shouldn't you set this PF to 1, so that the camera automatically adjusts for the film speed? That's what I do, and I get no ghosting problems that I know of. > -Original Message- > From: John Coyle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > For your problem, set the data imprinting intensity, funct

Re: Introduction and MZ-S data imprinting question

On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 08:10:30PM +0100, Kristian Walsh wrote: Thanks for the answers. > Mine has that "halo", but only on negative film; on transparency film > it's perfectly sharp. So it seems mine isn't the only one that does this. With PF15 set to 1 I've got this smudge on Fuji Superia 1

Re: Introduction and MZ-S data imprinting question

Tim Preston a écrit: >On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 08:10:30PM +0100, Kristian Walsh wrote: > >Thanks for the answers. > > >. > >On a slightly different tack, does anyone know if the IR remote for the >BG-10 actually exists. This was a surprise feature to me and seems like >a good idea, but I've

Re: Introduction and MZ-S data imprinting question

Michel Carrère-Gée a écrit: > Tim Preston a écrit: > >> On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 08:10:30PM +0100, Kristian Walsh wrote: >> >> Thanks for the answers. >> >> >> . >> >> On a slightly different tack, does anyone know if the IR remote for the >> BG-10 actually exists. This was a surprise featur

Re: Introduction (was: What Have You Learned Here?)

"Cotty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > *I've learned that it's proper netiquette to introduce oneself on an > > email list and say hello (I never did !!! and now I'm too ashamed to do > > it!) and Christian Skofteland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> replied: > I too am ashamed that I never introduced mysel

Re: Introduction (was: What Have You Learned Here?)

Ok I'll play too.. Hi my name is ann, I don't take _anything_ seriously anymore. One of my pentaxes died today (".. or was it yesterday? I can't remember.") when I collided with my benbow tripod upon which it was sitting and it and the tripod went crashing to the floor. I use my benbow tripod

<    1   2   3   4   >