On May 23, 2014, at 11:52 pm, John wrote:
> Speaking of trains, I'm reminded of a little poem:
>
> They met on a bridge at midnight
> They shall never meet again
> For she was a northbound cow
> And he was a southbound train
>
> Thank you. I'll be here all week.
I think someone posted that in
t log in to Google..
(if that is relevant)
I don't see anything on a tool bar (as there is in firefox) to
change preferences, for instance
btw - I just left Twitter.
ann
On 5/22/2014 15:18, steve harley wrote:
on 2014-05-22 13:07 John wrote
Don't know anything about Twitter, but the
ome at all in any way that I can remember..
I don't have google+ , I don't use gmail, I don't log in to Google..
(if that is relevant)
I don't see anything on a tool bar (as there is in firefox) to
change preferences, for instance
btw - I just left Twitter.
ann
On 5/22/2014 15:18
No problem.
On 23 May 2014 15:49, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
> ERic - I actually wrote the "oy no wonder" mail before I saw yours...
> It was about the only think I didn't click on earlier.
>
> HAVe to do some exploring
>
> thanks
> ann
>
>
>
> On 5/23/2014 09:58, Eric Featherstone wrote:
>>
>> On 23 M
ERic - I actually wrote the "oy no wonder" mail before I saw yours...
It was about the only think I didn't click on earlier.
HAVe to do some exploring
thanks
ann
On 5/23/2014 09:58, Eric Featherstone wrote:
On 23 May 2014 14:52, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
My google chrome browser window doesnt ha
On 23 May 2014 14:52, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
> My google chrome browser window doesnt have a tool bar -
It's the icon with the three horizontal bars at the top right. Then
either 'Settings' or ('Tools' then 'Extensions' )
Or you can get to the same place via these links:
chrome://settings/
chrome:
27;t use gmail, I don't log in to Google..
(if that is relevant)
I don't see anything on a tool bar (as there is in firefox) to
change preferences, for instance
btw - I just left Twitter.
ann
On 5/22/2014 15:18, steve harley wrote:
on 2014-05-22 13:07 John wrote
Don't know anything a
I think something must be hiding the menu you mention, steve
it's no biggie - mainly it's just annoying to try to copy and paste
an Http string from an email that goes across several lines of my email
I make mouse-o's as well as typo's :-)
ann
On 5/23/2014 02:18, steve harley wrote:
on 2014-05
On 5/22/2014 4:58 PM, Bob W-PDML wrote:
On 22 May 2014, at 18:56, "David J Brooks" wrote:
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 1:49 PM, Mark Roberts
wrote:
P.J. Alling wrote:
I've read twitter
My mother was an English professor. When she mentioned the Oxford
English Dictionary to one
haven't configured Chrome at all in any way that I can remember..
I don't have google+ , I don't use gmail, I don't log in to Google..
(if that is relevant)
I don't see anything on a tool bar (as there is in firefox) to
change preferences, for instance
btw - I just left Twitt
when I see the list how will I know the perp?
Will it be wearing a red carnation?
On 5/22/2014 15:18, steve harley wrote:
on 2014-05-22 13:07 John wrote
Don't know anything about Twitter, but the number of places Google
Chrome won't
let you go suggests to me you should get rid of Goo
on 2014-05-22 22:37 Ann Sanfedele wrote
Steve
I'm not following this..
I haven't configured Chrome at all in any way that I can remember..
i was just guessing at reasons why Chrome behaves so weirdly for you …
I don't see anything on a tool bar (as there is in firefox) to
change preferences,
erences, for instance
btw - I just left Twitter.
ann
On 5/22/2014 15:18, steve harley wrote:
on 2014-05-22 13:07 John wrote
Don't know anything about Twitter, but the number of places Google
Chrome won't let you go suggests to me you should get rid of Google Chrome.
i think Ann&#
The last page of my copy was removed so i have no idea how it ended.
For a clue...
the butler did it in the library with a candlestick !
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "David J Brooks"
Subject: Re: OT - Twitter
On 22 May 2014, at 18:56, "David J Brooks" wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 1:49 PM, Mark Roberts
> wrote:
>> P.J. Alling wrote:
>>
>>> I've read twitter
>>
>> My mother was an English professor. When she mentioned the Oxford
>
On 22 May 2014, at 18:48, "Mark Roberts" wrote:
>
> P.J. Alling wrote:
>
>> See, this is what passes for discourse on twitter, and I believe that
>> you've both proved my point, so thank you for your support.
>
> That's like saying books are st
on 2014-05-22 14:13 Ann Sanfedele wrote
ah.. and when I see the list how will I know the perp?
Will it be wearing a red carnation?
metaphorically speaking, perhaps — read the descriptions and use intuition;
Chrome should work fine without any extensions, so if there's anything there
seemingly
arley wrote:
Twitter is what you make of it — i rarely tweet, usually incomprehensible
outbursts, but it's a terrific resource for certain types of information
Much like Facebook – mostly frivolous but invaluable some times.
Without Facebook I never would have caught that student of mine who
ah.. and when I see the list how will I know the perp?
Will it be wearing a red carnation?
On 5/22/2014 15:18, steve harley wrote:
on 2014-05-22 13:07 John wrote
Don't know anything about Twitter, but the number of places Google
Chrome won't
let you go suggests to me you should
about Twitter, but the number of places Google
Chrome won't let you go suggests to me you should get rid of Google Chrome.
On 5/22/2014 2:45 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Ok - here's the thing... I figured that with PDML, FAcebook (especially
my words with friends)crossword games lists, cafep
on 2014-05-22 13:52 Mark Roberts wrote
steve harley wrote:
Twitter is what you make of it — i rarely tweet, usually incomprehensible
outbursts, but it's a terrific resource for certain types of information
Much like Facebook – mostly frivolous but invaluable some times.
Without Faceb
steve harley wrote:
>Twitter is what you make of it i rarely tweet, usually incomprehensible
>outbursts, but it's a terrific resource for certain types of information
Much like Facebook mostly frivolous but invaluable some times.
Without Facebook I never would have caught that
on 2014-05-22 24:06 Steve Cottrell wrote
Mark writing about his videos of travelling to GFM made me think (as it
always does!) that there may be some on the list who do Twitter. I tend
to use it on a professional basis with a bit of humour thrown in
(keeping my FB stuff just general junk) and
on 2014-05-22 13:07 John wrote
Don't know anything about Twitter, but the number of places Google Chrome won't
let you go suggests to me you should get rid of Google Chrome.
i think Ann's Chrome must be using a very restrictive "blocker" extension or
something l
Don't know anything about Twitter, but the number of places Google
Chrome won't let you go suggests to me you should get rid of Google Chrome.
On 5/22/2014 2:45 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Ok - here's the thing... I figured that with PDML, FAcebook (especially
my words with fr
On 5/22/2014 1:49 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
P.J. Alling wrote:
I've read twitter
My mother was an English professor. When she mentioned the Oxford
English Dictionary to one of her students he said "Oh yes, I've read
that".
... and your father smelt of elderberries.
--
http://www.newyorker.com/talk/2009/04/20/090420ta_talk_trudeau
On 5/22/2014 1:08 PM, Steve Cottrell wrote:
On 22/5/14, P.J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
Twitter is for people with short attention spans not a lot to say and
lots of time to say it.
#dicktard
--
Science - Questions
Absolute twits.
Alan C
-Original Message-
From: Steve Cottrell
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2014 8:20 PM
To: pentax list
Subject: Re: OT - Twitter
On 22/5/14, P.J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
For every pithy comment,
there's a ton of dross
Er, doesn't it kind of
Ok - here's the thing... I figured that with PDML, FAcebook (especially
my words with friends)crossword games lists, cafepress, ebay, etc
Twitter would just be something else to remember to look at and I'm not
sure i did it right anyway... the thing is..
I can't even get on no
On 22/5/14, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
>The Twitter feeds I follow include the Paris Review and the London
>Review of Books. Both frequently have useful and concise pointers to
>articles that I would otherwise miss. And never any dross. For all the
>undoubted sillines
On 22/5/14, P.J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
> For every pithy comment,
>there's a ton of dross
Er, doesn't it kind of matter who you're interested in reading, and
(ipso facto) who you follow? Funny that because of the people I follow,
the signal-to-noise ratio is very low. Maybe you sho
Bruce Walker wrote:
>On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 1:55 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
>> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 1:49 PM, Mark Roberts
>> wrote:
>>> P.J. Alling wrote:
>>>
>>>>I've read twitter
>>>
>>> My mother was an English professor
ad a few citations for
>fun. There's one thing I can say about the OED that I can't say about
>twitter, no dross.
The point is your statement that you have "read Twitter" is as valid
as the student's claim to have read the OED. For every academic who
uses the OE
On 5/22/2014 2:05 PM, P.J. Alling wrote:
On 5/22/2014 1:47 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
P.J. Alling wrote:
See, this is what passes for discourse on twitter, and I believe that
you've both proved my point, so thank you for your support.
That's like saying books are stupid: You can
On 5/22/2014 2:06 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 1:55 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 1:49 PM, Mark Roberts
wrote:
P.J. Alling wrote:
I've read twitter
My mother was an English professor. When she mentioned the Oxford
English Dictionary to one o
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 1:55 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 1:49 PM, Mark Roberts
> wrote:
>> P.J. Alling wrote:
>>
>>>I've read twitter
>>
>> My mother was an English professor. When she mentioned the Oxford
>> English Dicti
On 5/22/2014 1:47 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
P.J. Alling wrote:
See, this is what passes for discourse on twitter, and I believe that
you've both proved my point, so thank you for your support.
That's like saying books are stupid: You can prove the statement true
if you cherry pick
On 5/22/2014 1:55 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 1:49 PM, Mark Roberts
wrote:
P.J. Alling wrote:
I've read twitter
My mother was an English professor. When she mentioned the Oxford
English Dictionary to one of her students he said "Oh yes, I've read
that&q
here's one thing I can say about the OED that I can't say about
twitter, no dross.
On 5/22/2014 1:49 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
P.J. Alling wrote:
I've read twitter
My mother was an English professor. When she mentioned the Oxford
English Dictionary to one of her students he sai
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 1:49 PM, Mark Roberts
wrote:
> P.J. Alling wrote:
>
>>I've read twitter
>
> My mother was an English professor. When she mentioned the Oxford
> English Dictionary to one of her students he said "Oh yes, I've read
> that".
The l
P.J. Alling wrote:
>I've read twitter
My mother was an English professor. When she mentioned the Oxford
English Dictionary to one of her students he said "Oh yes, I've read
that".
--
Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
--
PDML Pe
P.J. Alling wrote:
>See, this is what passes for discourse on twitter, and I believe that
>you've both proved my point, so thank you for your support.
That's like saying books are stupid: You can prove the statement true
if you cherry pick the right books. The same is true wi
See, this is what passes for discourse on twitter, and I believe that
you've both proved my point, so thank you for your support.
On 5/22/2014 1:16 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Steve Cottrell wrote:
On 22/5/14, P.J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
Twitter is for people with short atte
Steve Cottrell wrote:
>On 22/5/14, P.J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>>Twitter is for people with short attention spans not a lot to say and
>>lots of time to say it.
>
>#dicktard
+1
--
Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
On 5/22/2014 1:08 PM, Steve Cottrell wrote:
On 22/5/14, P.J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
Twitter is for people with short attention spans not a lot to say and
lots of time to say it.
#dicktard
I've read twitter, you can't prove me wrong.
--
A newspaper is a device for
On 22/5/14, P.J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Twitter is for people with short attention spans not a lot to say and
>lots of time to say it.
#dicktard
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
|| (O) |Web Video Prod
On 22/5/14, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
>You might inspire me to look at my twitter stream more often...
:-)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
|| (O) |Web Video Production
--
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss M
Twitter is for people with short attention spans not a lot to say and
lots of time to say it.
On 5/22/2014 10:04 AM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
I just got on a month or so ago only to enter a local poetry contest -
I didn't win. I followed a couple of friends and saw a couple follow
me.. I&
words, let alone 140 characters.
If I stay there I'll be following ya
ann
@annsaniam
On 5/22/2014 02:06, Steve Cottrell wrote:
Mark writing about his videos of travelling to GFM made me think (as it
always does!) that there may be some on the list who do Twitter. I tend
to use it on a prof
You might inspire me to look at my twitter stream more often...
Godfrey
> On May 21, 2014, at 11:06 PM, Steve Cottrell wrote:
>
> Mark writing about his videos of travelling to GFM made me think (as it
> always does!) that there may be some on the list who do Twitter. I tend
>
Mark writing about his videos of travelling to GFM made me think (as it
always does!) that there may be some on the list who do Twitter. I tend
to use it on a professional basis with a bit of humour thrown in
(keeping my FB stuff just general junk) and regularly post pics and
updates of work
- Original Message -
From: "Walt"Subject: Re: Interesting Twitter Photo Copyright Issues
On 1/17/2013 3:24 AM, Steve Cottrell wrote:
On 16/1/13, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
I'm fine with Twitter, Posterous, Facebook, etc. for having fun and
sharing sn
On 1/17/2013 3:24 AM, Steve Cottrell wrote:
On 16/1/13, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
I'm fine with Twitter, Posterous, Facebook, etc. for having fun and
sharing snapshots. But if you take a genuinely newsworthy photograph
and put it on one of these sites before registering
On 16/1/13, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
>I'm fine with Twitter, Posterous, Facebook, etc. for having fun and
>sharing snapshots. But if you take a genuinely newsworthy photograph
>and put it on one of these sites before registering your copyright...
>You. Are
On 20 March 2012 16:45, Walt Gilbert wrote:
> On 3/20/2012 3:33 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
>>
>> On Mar 20, 2012, at 12:04 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
>>
>>> One of my former law partners (now deceased) wrote to a judge "I
>>> intended to write a much shorter brief, but I didn't have the time."
>>
>>
On 3/20/2012 3:33 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Mar 20, 2012, at 12:04 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
One of my former law partners (now deceased) wrote to a judge "I
intended to write a much shorter brief, but I didn't have the time."
One thing that writing and photography share in common, is that
On Mar 20, 2012, at 12:04 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
> One of my former law partners (now deceased) wrote to a judge "I
> intended to write a much shorter brief, but I didn't have the time."
One thing that writing and photography share in common, is that so often the
best way to improve eithe
One of my former law partners (now deceased) wrote to a judge "I
intended to write a much shorter brief, but I didn't have the time."
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> "I would have made the document shorter if
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 4:38 PM, P. J. Alling
wrote:
> I wonder how much time is considered ample, by a service that considers, 140
> characters a thesis.
"I would have made the document shorter if only I had a bit more time
to work on it."
--
Godfrey
godfreydigiorgi.posterous.com
--
PDML P
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 1:48 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
> From: Darren Addy
>
>> I know a lot of PDMLers use Posterous, so you probably got (or will
>> get) the same email that I just did informing you that Posterous has
>> been acquired by Twitter. Not sure what th
From: Darren Addy
I know a lot of PDMLers use Posterous, so you probably got (or will
get) the same email that I just did informing you that Posterous has
been acquired by Twitter. Not sure what they have in mind, but the
"Acquisition FAQ" only says that "ample time"
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 7:38 PM, P. J. Alling
wrote:
> On 3/19/2012 7:24 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
>>
>> I know a lot of PDMLers use Posterous, so you probably got (or will
>> get) the same email that I just did informing you that Posterous has
>> been acquired by Twitter.
On 3/19/2012 7:24 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
I know a lot of PDMLers use Posterous, so you probably got (or will
get) the same email that I just did informing you that Posterous has
been acquired by Twitter. Not sure what they have in mind, but the
"Acquisition FAQ" only says that "a
I know a lot of PDMLers use Posterous, so you probably got (or will
get) the same email that I just did informing you that Posterous has
been acquired by Twitter. Not sure what they have in mind, but the
"Acquisition FAQ" only says that "ample time" will be given of any
serv
Stan, I think this is exactly Roman's point.
This is the ' Twitter ' of post (whatever worldwide nuclear
catastrophe you can think of).
I do not fancy the picture much but I think the idea is good. Roman,
you should push the idea further IMO
--
Thibault Massart aka T
On Jun 16, 2011, at 3:53 PM, Roman Melihhov wrote:
> http://roman.blakout.net/?blog=20110616153649
>
> DA 18-55mm kit lens (starting to like it again. This is how twitter
> dashboard shall be looking in a post-apocalyptic world. Your comments,
> similar topics appreciated
Can you explain what a twitter dashboard is? I have heard of twitter, some
application where people broadcast short SMS messages to selected others. But I
don't know what a dashboard is in that context. The photo seems to be just some
juvenile graffiti. Of the two images, I prefer the seco
http://roman.blakout.net/?blog=20110616153649
DA 18-55mm kit lens (starting to like it again. This is how twitter
dashboard shall be looking in a post-apocalyptic world. Your comments,
similar topics appreciated.
--
Roman Melihhov
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http
Bob W wrote:
Twitter seems to me to be instant messaging, without the
instant, archived to preserve the banality for posterity.
Someday that Twitter archive could be as fascinating and
important as
the Vindolanda letters.
It will need to be soaked
From: mike wilson
Bob W wrote:
> > > > > > Twitter seems to me to be instant messaging, without the
> > > > > > instant, archived to preserve the banality for posterity.
> > > > >
> > > > > Someday that Twitter archiv
Bob W wrote:
> > > > > > Twitter seems to me to be instant messaging, without the
> > > > > > instant, archived to preserve the banality for posterity.
> > > > >
> > > > > Someday that Twitter archive could be as fas
> > > > > Twitter seems to me to be instant messaging, without the
> > > > > instant, archived to preserve the banality for posterity.
> > > >
> > > > Someday that Twitter archive could be as fascinating and
> > > important as
Bob W wrote:
> > > > Twitter seems to me to be instant messaging, without the instant,
> > > > archived to preserve the banality for posterity.
> > >
> > > Someday that Twitter archive could be as fascinating and
> > important as
> &
> > > Twitter seems to me to be instant messaging, without the instant,
> > > archived to preserve the banality for posterity.
> >
> > Someday that Twitter archive could be as fascinating and
> important as
> > the Vindolanda letters.
>
> It will n
Bob W wrote:
> > >
> > Twitter seems to me to be instant messaging, without the
> > instant, archived to preserve the banality for posterity.
>
> Someday that Twitter archive could be as fascinating and important as the
> Vindolanda letters.
It will need
Responding to the original question:
I use Tweetie. It's reliable and easy to use, there are versions for
both my desktop/laptop computer as well as iPhone/iPod Touch.
--
Godfrey
godfreydigiorgi.posterous.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml
> >
> Twitter seems to me to be instant messaging, without the
> instant, archived to preserve the banality for posterity.
Someday that Twitter archive could be as fascinating and important as the
Vindolanda letters.
Bob
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml
John Sessoms wrote:
From: Tim Bray
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 2:34 PM, P. J. Alling
wrote:
> Why oh why would you want to do that to yourself. Hell why would
you want to
> use twitter at all...
I find that Twitter enriches my life and helps me do my job. I
entirely understand that oth
From: Tim Bray
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 2:34 PM, P. J. Alling
wrote:
> Why oh why would you want to do that to yourself. Hell why would you want to
> use twitter at all...
I find that Twitter enriches my life and helps me do my job. I
entirely understand that others do not. Somehow, th
I use Twitter to follow news, e.g., pentaxusers, leica_camera,
japanexposures, naraneko (Portuguese) and some photographers who
'tweet'. I guess I could use other ways to follow the news, but I got
used to this method.
BTW, I am sure that I have nothing important to say, so I don&#x
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 2:34 PM, P. J. Alling
wrote:
> Why oh why would you want to do that to yourself. Hell why would you want to
> use twitter at all...
I find that Twitter enriches my life and helps me do my job. I
entirely understand that others do not. Somehow, those of us who
Why oh why would you want to do that to yourself. Hell why would you
want to use twitter at all...
Nuno Miguel dos Santos Baeta wrote:
Hello!
I want to stop using a browser when using Twitter. Any opinions on a
"good" Twitter client for Mac OS X?
TIA!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
Nuno Miguel dos Santos Baeta wrote:
Hello!
I want to stop using a browser when using Twitter. Any opinions on a
"good" Twitter client for Mac OS X?
TIA!
I've also tried a few and ended up with the free client Nambu. Use the
latest Beta if you want the best feat
Nuno Miguel dos Santos Baeta wrote:
>Any opinions on a "good" Twitter client for Mac OS X?
"Good Twitter client"
Nope. Just can't wrap my head around that concept.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Nuno Miguel dos Santos Baeta
wrote:
> I want to stop using a browser when using Twitter. Any opinions on a
> "good" Twitter client for Mac OS X?
I've tried a few and ended up with Tweetie, http://www.atebits.com/tweetie-mac/
They say it
Hello!
I want to stop using a browser when using Twitter. Any opinions on a
"good" Twitter client for Mac OS X?
TIA!
--
Nuno Miguel dos Santos Baeta
ille nihil dubitat quem nulla scientia dictat
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_p
Of
Tim Bray
Sent: 17 September 2009 06:25
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: PDML on Twitter
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 7:17 PM, Doug Brewer wrote:
paul stenquist wrote:
Ran across this by chance. I guess someone has exported us to
twitter:
http://twitter.com/pdml
pretty sure that w
. -T
> On Sep 18, 2009, at 7:30 PM, Chris Mitchell wrote:
>
>> http://www.mitch.myzen.co.uk/PDML/
>>
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
>>> Tim Bray
>>> Sent: 1
25
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: PDML on Twitter
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 7:17 PM, Doug Brewer
wrote:
paul stenquist wrote:
Ran across this by chance. I guess someone has exported us to
twitter:
http://twitter.com/pdml
pretty sure that was our Tim Bray who did that.
Awww, "
http://www.mitch.myzen.co.uk/PDML/
> -Original Message-
> From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
> Tim Bray
> Sent: 17 September 2009 06:25
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: PDML on Twitter
>
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2009
Excellent work. Thanks for this. It's a plus for the PDML.
Paul
On Sep 17, 2009, at 1:25 AM, Tim Bray wrote:
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 7:17 PM, Doug Brewer wrote:
paul stenquist wrote:
Ran across this by chance. I guess someone has exported us to
twitter:
http://twitter.com/pdml
p
Tim,
Thanks for the detail. It is an interesting read.
Learn something new everyday.
-Pasvorn
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 10:25 PM, Tim Bray wrote:
>
> Yes. Details at
> http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2008/04/30/PDML-Twitter-Mashup
>
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@p
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 7:17 PM, Doug Brewer wrote:
> paul stenquist wrote:
>>
>> Ran across this by chance. I guess someone has exported us to twitter:
>> http://twitter.com/pdml
>
> pretty sure that was our Tim Bray who did that.
Awww, "*our* Tim Bray"?
On Sep 16, 2009, at 10:19 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
Oh that's scary...
Why? It's just pics that were posted here for public viewing.
Paul
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 9:11 PM, paul stenquist > wrote:
Ran across this by chance. I guess someone has exported us to
twitter:
http:
Oh that's scary...
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 9:11 PM, paul stenquist wrote:
> Ran across this by chance. I guess someone has exported us to twitter:
> http://twitter.com/pdml
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml
paul stenquist wrote:
Ran across this by chance. I guess someone has exported us to twitter:
http://twitter.com/pdml
pretty sure that was our Tim Bray who did that.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML
Ran across this by chance. I guess someone has exported us to twitter:
http://twitter.com/pdml
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
On May 8, 2008, at 11:50 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
> Tim Bray wrote:
>> On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 3:01 PM, Cory Waters
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Anybody using Twitter?
>>
>> PDML PESOs are on Twitter: http://twitter.com/PDML -Tim
>
> You k
Tim Bray wrote:
> On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 3:01 PM, Cory Waters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Anybody using Twitter?
>
> PDML PESOs are on Twitter: http://twitter.com/PDML -Tim
You know, that's pretty cool. In fact, it's the first *useful* use of
Twitter I
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 3:01 PM, Cory Waters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anybody using Twitter?
PDML PESOs are on Twitter: http://twitter.com/PDML -Tim
> CW
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.
1 - 100 of 117 matches
Mail list logo
