You are first on the alternate list. The earliest responders are all
overseas; once I figure the postage costs for them, one or more may
change his mind. I may also have one or two in a different location,
I'll check tomorrow. If one does become available, I'll get back to
you...
Stan
On Mar
Oops - that was supposed to go to John! Sorry.
Anyway, it saves me sending my next message which was to the list to
let you know that my stock is now depleted. If additional show up in my
rummagings, I'll re-post.
Stan
On Mar 18, 2005, at 9:35 PM, Stan Halpin wrote:
You are first
From my personal archive of comments that haven't made it to the
website yet, I could only find the following from Paul Senquist last
summer:
I'm very happy with the FA 28-105, although I have very little
experience with autofocus zooms. It's become my favorite walkaround
lens with the
I didn't know Pentax USA had added an online store! I just went there,
tried to order a LL-60 screen and a dozen golf balls. This is what I
got for my troubles:
Tax jurisdiction code could not be determined
Say what?
Oh well, the time spent it was worth it just to get a unique
Of the three (good) lenses you are considering, I suggest a
fourth:
FA 31 limited. Small sensuous silky sharp super ...
Stan
Greg Lovern wrote:
I have the DA 16-45mm and I like it, but I get sharper photos on my *ist D
when I use my F 50/1.7 and my Tamron 90/2.5 Macro (which I use more for
No 30mm? No 43mm? No 120mm? You have some shopping to do!
Stan
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Amita Guha
Subject: what would you do?
Anyway, what would you guys do? I'd love to hear some other
thoughts
before I make up my mind on this.
Since I am not a big fan of zoom
I have several long-standing orders through my local dealer.
He tells me that Pentax seems unable to deliver anything,
large or small. Camera, lens, accessory - it doesn't matter,
he can't get them to fill the order. He is as frustrated as
I am.
Stan
jtainter wrote:
Does anyone know a place
Yeah, me too - I'll be arriving at GFM Thursday p.m. as
well, God willing and the creek don't rise.
Stan
Bill Owens wrote:
Add Steve, Debbie and probably the List Guy. We will also be drinking more
than the peace and quiet
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Steve Desjardins [EMAIL
I am back home in Kansas City. A total of 1900+ miles driven, 32.75
hours in the van since I left here last Wednesday.
I have many great (IMHO) portraits of PDMLers and friends at GFM, a few
decent shots of the venue. All of course are still 1.5-2.5 mb, include
distracting elements like dust,
The FA 20-35/4.0 won't give you the same reach as the 28-70, even on
the *ist-D, , but it is a nice lens. Worth looking at.
If strictly for use on the *ist-D, then by all means consider the DA
16-45/4.0. Covers about the same range as the 28-70 and is every bit
as good, maybe better.
Stan
On
Resending from the proper account this time...
From: Stanley Halpin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: June 8, 2004 7:24:18 PM CDT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Attention GFM folks- Anyone win/place/show in photo
contest?
Charles Braswell also placed, in the Accomplished Wildflower category.
He is a
Something like an A-24/2.8 would solve all of your problems Cory!
Stan
On Jun 8, 2004, at 9:27 PM, cbwaters wrote:
I need to buy a lens to get my mind off all this...
Cory
Jens - I have an FA* 80-200/2.8 that cost me less than $1000 (used).
There are others out there now and then. You have a better chance
finding one than getting a 70-210/2.8 anytime soon. Do you really need
that extra 10mm on either end?
Stan
On Jun 4, 2004, at 1:37 PM, Jens Bladt wrote:
Great
Or you could buy from a list member who has some quality 645 gear for
sale...
Stan
On Jun 10, 2004, at 10:35 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I found this 645n on eBay (item # 3820509724) for $1100.
It ends in 12 hours!
Included : 80 - 160 mm zoom lens, 220 film back
I found it
Does this remind anyone of the Who when he forgot t take his meds?
Stan
On Jun 10, 2004, at 5:21 PM, Shawn K. wrote:
But but, I just put all YOUR messages in the trash bin!! Little..,.
Little.., uh GUY!!! YOU LITTLE GUY, your messages are going in the
trash
right now, PLONK (whatever the hell
Mine is 5687xxx, purchased early December 2003, small local photo store.
Stan
On Jun 18, 2004, at 9:52 AM, Dario Bonazza wrote:
Hi all,
In my effort of understanding (guessing?) something better about the
*ist D,
I'll ask all *ist D owners to post the main part of the serial No. of
the
camera
I thought it was the 20-35/4.
stan
On Jun 30, 2004, at 8:02 PM, Herb Chong wrote:
i thought it was the FA* 200/4 ED Macro in 2001 or 2002.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Shaun Canning [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2004 10:21 AM
Subject: Re: Rumors
Put a #1 and/or #2 extension tube on that puppy and you will have an
interesting 300mm macro of sorts.
I few years ago I tried several times to buy either the M* or A* 300,
but Fred always outbid me. The opening bids were closer to $400 as I
recall...
Enjoy!
Stan
On Jul 8, 2004, at 7:44 AM,
Congratulations and welcome to a new way of thinking about images...
Stan
On Jul 8, 2004, at 4:32 AM, Anders Hultman wrote:
This M lens, however, kinda does work, but not really as expected:
Cosinon-T 135/3.5
Metering with the green button works, but only at full aperture. The
lens don't
I usually avoid getting into one of these side-bar discussions. But I
do want to note here that I am very impressed and appreciative that Bob
B. and Tom C. and others have been able to express their objections
without screaming, yelling, or accusing anyone of being the devil in
disguise. And
You cannot use 120 film in a 220 film back or vice versa.
These cameras are built like a tank and don't have a whole lot to go
wrong with them. I would check that the meter seems accurate, the motor
works smoothly, the negs aren't getting scratched in the transport
mechanism, basic stuff like
Within your constraints, I wouldn't want to drive 8 hours to get
someplace, set up and 'do photography' , and then drive 8 hours to get
home. I would rather wander toward a destination, maybe that
destination is 8 hours away, but I might never get that far if
distracted by photo opportunities
Bob, On this side of the pond, using what is oxymoronically known as
American English, there is a businesspersons' phrase which is used as
follows: Dear Mr. Jones: In re: your letter of the 5th,... with the
apparent presumption being that 're' is short for 'reference'. I have
never seen/heard
The Concentric address for the lens info site is now history. They have
imposed a 300kb monthly bandwidth which is way too low. After one week
into the new billing month I was already down to 10% capacity remaining...
I have a new web hosting service and a new domain name. But haven't had
time
Thank you Mark, and a Happy Pentax New Year to you!
Stan
Mark Roberts wrote:
I've been keeping a collection of my favorite quotations from PDML posts
for a couple of years (at least). Now seems like a good time to share it
with everyone. Enjoy!
It's more important to be a photographer than a
Actually, there is a PDML FAQ. It was once set to all new subscribers
and then to all members once a month. It is still out there on the web
somewhere if you want to do a search
Steve - welcome.
FYI, and for others as well, you can find anything you want about Pentax
lenses and cameras
Congratulations Thrainn! As one who has been married several times, most
recently for more than 18 years, I am a strong supporter of the
institution. I attended a wedding on the 31st, far too many people, far
too much expense and extravagance, far too much food and free booze... A
family
Yo Tanya - I know you know better, but in case you get carried away let
me comment...
I only looked at the first of the machines you referenced. That machine
is no stinking good! The internal hard drive should be 10 times larger,
the memory should be at least 4, preferably 8 times larger.
1. For those who have me listed in their address book,
please note that my primary email address is changed; I will
be receiving mail at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2. Also note the new address for the old Lens Info site:
http://stans-photography.info
This will also be the address of the new site when
Ian, he IS right. Buy, read, study Shaw's Closeups in
Nature. Go try some macro shots. Then go back and read Shaw
again. He is an extremly good writer, one who is effective
at getting his ideas across.
Stan
Ian bromehead wrote:
Andy
I am just as gullible as you, ...
The guy I bought them from
Kostas - I am in the midst of a move from the 2nd generation
web site to the fourth. 1G = HTML hand coded. 2G = HTML
created with a code generator, WYSIWY(sometimes)G, using
frames as the basic infrastructure. 3G = table based. 4G =
CSS based.
The two big advantages of both 3G and 4G designs,
I saw something in the manual (probably the grip manual)
which may explain it. It warns that if you have both the
grip and the body turned on, that you must have the switch
in the correct position. If the grip (or the body?) on-off
switch gets pushed to an intermediary position it can
confuse
It is absolutely definitely not the same as for the MZ-S.
However, the saving grace here is that any IR source,
including your Palm PDA, but especially any version of
Pentax's IR remotes will work to fire the shutter. I believe
you can even use it for extended B exposures, but I would
have to
A minority opinion: I like the green button location.
I don't like the strap interfering with the CF flap. I have
no problem getting the CF card to eject.
The grip is a POS compared to the very fine MZ-S. Of the 4
grips I have used, in order of comfort and utility, I put
MZ-S 1st, PZ-1p
Thanks - I think you are right!
stan
keller.schaefer wrote:
I think the line in the manual refers to either of the 'wheels' on grip or body
to be in an intermediate position (between rests), not the switch.
Sven
Stan Halpin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I saw something in the manual (probably the grip
Anyone currently on the list who lives in Singapore? There
is a good chance I will have a few days there later this month.
Anyone with experience in Singapore who would care to offer
suggestions re photo opportunities etc?
(Yes, my time will probably overlap New Year's Day...)
Stan
Ryan - thanks for the detailed reply! Rob, Bob, thanks also.
All good information which I hope to have a chance to put to
use. I am going (probably) for a three-day meeting, may get
one day on front end, one day after the meeting, maybe a few
hours to myself in the evenings.
I'll read your
I checked one of the web sites, saw high of 30°, low of
21° and thought that looked about like it is here. It took
about 7 microseconds to realize that they were talking
celsius, I was thinking Fahrenheit...
I am disappointed to hear that I have to look out for
pickpockets (which also
Thanks!!!
Kewl!
Stan
Ramesh Kumar wrote:
As expected there is some pentax news at
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0401/04010901pentaxistdfw11.asp
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the Signing Bonus Sweepstakes
Works just the same on K lenses...
stan
Bill Owens wrote:
It says M lenses, doesn't mention K. It's basically aperture priority with
the added step of pressing the green button. When it's pressed, the lens
stops down to the selected aperture, the shutter speed is selected, and the
lens opens
It keeps the same shutter speed. It is as though you had set
the exposure manually. It sticks until you push the button
again.
stan
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
OK, now for the $64,000 question:
Once the ap and shutter speed have been set,
will the camera remember them for subsequent
exposures
Also note:
1. You can turn the camera off, turn it back on, and the
previous setting is still there. Just like as though it were
a manual camera! It stays there until you press the green
button again or change the lens.
2. You can adjust the aperture (using the oldfashioned ring
around the
Sorry - I got the Mac version...
stan
Tiger Moses wrote:
One of you guys with a 300baud modem is draging the Pentax site down and
I cant download!
Can someone send me the EXE file directly? Please
You get one of the three formats, take your pick. If you
pick RAW or TIFF, then use the Pentax or other software to
save as JPEG later if you like.
From turn on to ready-to-shoot? About 1/10 sec as near as I
can measure. In any case, too fast to worry about.
Stan
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
When
I downloaded direct to the camera instead of putting the
installer on a CF card and putting that to the camera.
Date - time and all other settings were preserved.
Stan
Thomas Stach wrote:
this is Thomas from Germany!
I also just installed the new firmware; all language settings and user
Interesting. I wonder why Thomas lost his date-time settings.
stan
Dag T wrote:
I used the card, and date and time was preserved.
DagT
På 9. jan. 2004 kl. 13.46 skrev Stan Halpin:
I downloaded direct to the camera instead of putting the
installer on a CF card and putting
My experience in the U.K., several trips over the last 22
years, has convinced me that the currency is irrelevant.
Only the unit matters. Which is to say, anything that costs
$10 retail in the U.S. will cost about 10 pounds (can't find
the pound symbol mutter mutter). It doesn't surprise me to
The PZ-1p has what is called a grip strap. Truly a
wonderful addition to the camera.
What you get is a small extension to the bottom of the
camera. No battery holder, no electronics, just the plastic
platform that attaches to the bottom. This gives you two things.
First, the addition extends
I have the perfect stew recipe if you need it...
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Steve Desjardins wrote:
We could actually do this if it would make things easier for people.
Start a post with... (snip)
o: WOOHOO! if you have found that perfect beef stew recipe.
Just a thought . . .
Steven Desjardins
Rob, I think you have most of it.
One thing that bugs me relates to managing the flies
weeks/months after shooting. Say I have the original saved,
e.g., IMGP1722. I decided to do something with it, do a
save-as as Brad-and-Jennifer-in-indiscrete-moment. A few
weeks later Outdoor Life magazine
Right now, today, my *ist-D two lens solution would be
20/2.8 and 43/1.9. My three lens solution would be 20/2.8,
31/1.8, 77/1.8. but I feel uncomfortable about not having a
100mm macro with me, so three becomes four... My one-lens
solution would be the 31/1.8. Or, if a zoom, the 20-35/4.0.
We are within the Kansas City city limits. The second owners
sold most of the farm to a developer; our two acres is
surrounded by duplexes and townhouses.
stan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stan,
Are you still in a rural area or has the city/suburbs grown out to surround
you?
...An interesting
Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
Thanks everyone who responded. I am definitely buying this lens. It is
definitely going to get a workout.
OTOH, I think that now Stan has a little more material for his web
site.
You have that right! Thanks for getting the discussion going.
Stan
You're wonderful bunch
About 2750 for me. About 1000 of those came in the 3 days I
got to spend on my own time in Singapore this week. It will
be a few days but I will get some posted. Including the shot
of the sign warning of pickpockets at work...
Stan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, here's a poll:
How many shots
I did one quick test, not all four. OS-X, 10.3.2. Formatted
a CF (SanDisk 512 Ultra) as Mac OS Standard. *ist-D said
card is not formatted.
So I formatted the card in the *ist-D.
I am not sure the point of this. I would not expect the
camera to use the computer's file system; I am just
Actually, FireWire is FireWire. Just because Apple pushed
the standard doesn't make it different on the Mac vs. a
Windows platform. Now that it has come to Windows, relax and
enjoy!
To your question - yes you can get a CF card reader that
plugs to the FireWire port. I don't have one, I use a
That part of my website won't help much.
IIRC, the $357 one is the PZ (Power Zoom) version, the
original one (which I own.) Considered to be a very good
lens though I have gotten spoiled by faster lenses. The
silver $189 version was made by Tamron and is ok but not
great. The $199 version is
Norm Baugher wrote:
For those who have purchased the sunkist, and are
relative digital
newbies - how has this affected your film camera usage?
E.g. when I
bought my 6x7, my 35mm shooting went down by about 75%.
Just curious...
Norm
Soon after I got my Optio 330 15 months ago I had a
I think that this would be a very fine lens for *ist-D
nature photography! I would be tempted except that I already
have a 300mm...
I think you overestimate the variability of light in a
typical nature photography scene. You really don't need to
be constantly adjusting the aperature/speed/ISO
?!
Stan
Lasse Karlsson wrote:
From: Stan Halpin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I took both MZ-S and Optio to Sweden and Finland for 10 days
in late September, combination of work and vacation. I
mostly used the Optio.
Stan,
Just for the record - as far as I'm concerned, you didn't visit Finland
(as far as I
This was my mode of transportation when I visited Lasse this
last October. Many different bars, restaurants, cafeteria,
casinos, duty free shopping. Play areas where you can park
the kids. Quite an operation. I was amazed at the low cost
of the ticket until I realized that transportation of
Good Frank! A bit of positive feedback and vindication for
the time and effort spent - well deserved!
Now, as we say to Tanya, get your prices up to match your
standard!
Stan
frank theriault wrote:
So, my little show opening reception was last night. It went well.
Lots of people came that
Or, even worse for those of us who already have the *ist-D,
we might have to wait months to get the 16-45 lens while all
available ones go into kit sales.
Stan
Joseph Tainter wrote:
Interesting that Pentax U.S.A. is offering a discount on a lens (the DA
16-45) that U.S. dealers seem to be
Actually - think about the time, place, and circumstances.
1. Most places here in the States don't fully staff on
weekends. Particularly Sundays. Particularly Super Bowl
Sunday. If retail, the sales people are there, but not
necessarily the big guys. Sunday-Monday in Oz is only
Bruce et al
I will be driving my van from K.C. I plan to arrive in the
GFM neighborhood Thursday evening. I'll be coming through
not too far from Ashville and could retrieve you from there.
I requested a camping permit. Then I got to thinking.
Thursday, Friday, Saturday, Sunday. Hmm, that is
I wonder if it is an upgrade to CS or a PlugIn that will
work on more humble variants like Elements 2.0 ...
stan
Paul Eriksson wrote:
According to this rumour wr will have support for raw in a couple of
weeks. I'm crossing my fingers.
I agree with most of what has been said. I can't really
comment on auto-focus speed, metering, motor speed etc.
because I just haven't paid attention. Both autofocus far
faster than my ME-Super ever did, faster than my Pentax 645,
faster than my previous digital (Optio 330). But I usually
use
It does NOT work with Elements 2.0 (on a Mac). I get a
message: The RAW Plugin is not compatible with this version
of Photoshop Elements.
Stan
Bill Owens wrote:
The download page shows it under PS CS. Anybody know if it will work in
7.0?
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Larry
I will probably buy the 16-45 first, then the 14mm as soon
as I have the money. I will put my FA20-35/4 on the MZ-S,
the D16-45mm on the *ist-D, and have a versatile set of
cameras. If I want to switch to primes, I'll put the A20/2.8
on the MZ-S and the D-14/2.8 on the *ist-D.
Different
We (actually, one of the guys working for me) have been
working with tools built on Latent Semantic Analysis (LSA)
to map threaded discussions and provide some convergence to
apparently disconnected threads. The result is better
understanding of the topic as measured by tests of the
students
Even the FA limited lenses are sort of odd that way--if you are willing to
pay premium prices for good optics and good build quality and retro
styling, are you gonna see the ZX-M (cheap, fragile) or MZ-S (blobby
collection of newfangled controls) as the ideal camera? They've both
got merits
Welcome!
Ask at your local photo shop. They can probably give you
your prints on CD instead of or in addition to paper. That
can cost quite a bit, a better approach may be to have them
scan selected frames after you have had a chance to evaluate
the prints. It may cost you $2 each time, but
In the last few days, all at one time, on eBay were listed
the 28mm Shift lens (new), an A* 200/2.8 (new), an A*
300/2.8 (new) and an A* 400/2.8 (new). Two different
sellers. Start price reflected their value (high), no
bidders on any of them. I don't think I have ever seen these
lenses up
I offer the following in almost complete ignorance; I have
not taken more than 2 or 3 RAW format photos on the D, and I
have not used the Pentax software. But,...
For better or worse, the new software I downloaded today is
NOT an Adobe plugin. It may or may not have any relation to
the plugin
I had a loaner TR-250 for a year or so. My then
brother-in-law was off to Vietnam for a second tour and
left his complete (!) set of Nikon lenses and bodies plus
his TR-250 in my care. For those who missed this one, the
TR-250 was the body of a TR-4 with the engine of the
soon-to-appear
Chris, actually Who showed all of the signs of a classic
schizophrenic (I hope the spell checker can handle that, I
sure can't.) So if you or others want the flavor of his
contributions, go to the psychiatric literature.
His most objectionable trait was the constant questioning of
the
I think I still had my ME-Super though I might have moved to
the PZ-1p by then. The LXen were still on the horizon.
Stan
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Cesar Matamoros II
Subject: RE: OT-Drumed out of PDML-was: Lunch with Wendy
I think I only had two or three LXen
Hey, it looked fast! It was fun to drive! Particularly in
the mountains in North Carolina and Virginia and on north
into New England. A vast playground...
Stan
Cotty wrote:
(sorry, my email app doesn't like long subject lines}
On 21/2/04, STAN THE PORCH MAN disgorged:
TR-250 was the body
Peter, Camera Direct, Sunny Brighton, Jolly Old England.
stan
Mark Dalal wrote:
Hey Folks,
Anyone know a good source for strap lugs?
Thanks in advance,
Mark
We are in that neighborhood every summer (family cabin about
20 miles away.) It is awesome. Of the hundreds of shots I
have taken in and around the dunes with 645 and 35mm, print
and transparency, I have never shot a wide shot that I am
pleased with. I have many flower or weed or texture or
Sounds like a pub crawl to me...
stan
Bob W wrote:
Hi,
I can see we're going to have to meet up for a drink sometime! You in Bob?
there's clearly a need for a research plan. We will have to identify
a statistically significant number of pubs in reasonable proximity,
serving different types
Yes. I have used a grid screen in all my Pentax cameras
where they were available. i.e., LX, 645, and MZ-S. 99% of
the time I do not look 'at' the grid, but through it.
Nevertheless, I find it helps me with composition, level
shots, etc.
Stan (waiting for a grid for the *ist-D...)
Mark
It is the Irish in me. Which is more evident when I have
Scotch in me.
Cheers!
stan
Cotty wrote:
On 23/2/04, STAN THE POET disgorged:
Laphroaig anyone? In honor of this thread I have opened a
bottle which I am sipping neat, of course. The only water in
my Whisky are the tears I shed as
Good news! Should be a good weekend - well worth the trip.
Stan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay, batten down the hatches and hide the booze*, Marnie aka Doe is coming
to GFM!
Well, I am mailing off the registration fee tomorrow by express mail, so if
it gets there in time, that is.
I'll be
In this country it would be a deductible business expense.
You would recoup most of the cost in tax savings.
And think how you can jack up your prices once you can say
'I studied with tv in North Carolina, that is in the States
you know, and so of course my rates will be higher than the
These shots do not do a great deal for me. They are like
many which I have taken when I have traveled - they remind
me of a time/place, but they have little impact for anyone else.
Of the four, I like the broad view of City Hall the best.
The others, I am not sure what you are seeing. For
That dog is a wimp. I don't think she bites her food without
asking it first if it is ok. I just met her Saturday, but we
had one like her.
Stan
graywolf wrote:
That is an angry looking Wookey. Watch out or you will wind up with your
arm torn off. (grin)
--
Stan Halpin wrote:
OK - I'll
Shi-Tzu's are virtually always happy. Or dazed. When God was
allocating brains among dogs, Shi-Tzu's were off playing.
Stan
Peter J. Alling wrote:
Nice detail but he/she doesn't look happy...
Stan Halpin wrote:
OK - I'll play the game and give people a chance to fire back at me...
http
Very fine work Dario! Thank you.
Stan
Dario Bonazza wrote:
Here is a selection of *ist D pictures I took yesterday:
http://www.dariobonazza.com/f1_04e.htm
Dario Bonazza
on 6/23/03 9:29 AM, tom at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Lon Williamson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mebbe what we ought to do is place an MZ-S in TV's hands for
6 months (if he doesn't have one) and get a report back.
That would settle build quality and
I'll be making a quick trip East in a couple of weeks. Coming back home I
pass through London, arriving at LHR 1830 on the 18th, continuing on at 1030
on the 19th. Any PDMLers up for a pub crawl, dinner, whatever?
I expect to be travelling very light, with maybe only my Optio 330RS with me
this
on 7/01/03 11:19 AM, tom at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Mark Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jan van Wijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After more than two years lusting for the MZ-S, and all
the time thinking
yes I like it, but no I do not need it, I
on 7/03/03 9:54 AM, Pål Jensen at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think do. Theres a hole in the common lens line-ups that needs to be filled:
the compact well built zoom. Eother zooms are consumer grade and lightweight
or they are pro grade an heavy. A niche for us landscape shooters, or simply
I said I would post some old vs. new shots of some of the classic lenses vs.
the Limiteds. (Shots of them, not shots by them. Some other day.)
I am not that pleased with mu Optio 330 shots, I will re-do them before I
post the complete set. Meanwhile, here is a shot of the MZ-S with black 31mm
and
on 7/10/03 7:20 AM, Steve Desjardins at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As I wrote I switched
from Pimms to a Mexican beer (Tecate if you must know) and you can
blame any
errors on either or the combination of the two.
Modela Negra (sp?) is my favorite, but I've had some trouble getting it
in
--
From: Stan Halpin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Building a DSLR
on 7/10/03 7:20 AM, Steve Desjardins at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As I wrote I switched
from Pimms to a Mexican beer (Tecate if you must know) and you can
blame any
errors on either or the combination of the two
on 7/10/03 2:34 PM, William Robb at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For myself, I think I have made 2 inkjet prints from several hundred digital
exposures, and had a dozen 4x6 proofs made for a particular purpose.
So,
inkjet prints: .5%
Effectively 0%, as when I took that particular series of
They are nice shots Paul, but she doesn't fit the setting. To be believable,
she needs more makeup (eye shadow, liner, rouge, lipstick, the whole bit).
she needs a tattoo on at least one shoulder, on her belly, and on her ankle,
and she needs to have a cigarette in her hand or mouth in every
on 8/14/03 7:30 PM, Mark Roberts at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am most interested in the view finder. But I presume you guys will report
all that.
We will, but the report might not be relevant to a single user when it's
based on ten people all trying to look
This is a warning notice: tomorrow (Friday) I will be doing an inventory
(i.e., digging out stuff I haven't used in a while), taking some pictures to
post, writing up descriptions, trying to decide on a fair price, etc. Pentax
items that I expect to offer for sale over the next few days are:
701 - 800 of 3177 matches
Mail list logo
