Re: [HACKERS] Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...

2003-08-30 Thread Larry Rosenman
for complaining about these facts. I want to see PostgreSQL succeed and take over the Open Source DataBase world, and want to help, but y'all are making it HARD. LER -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [HACKERS] Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...

2003-08-30 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Friday, August 29, 2003 23:17:50 -0400 Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Larry Rosenman wrote: Don't start on the SCO issue. I submitted patches last weekend to fix the UnixWare (and possibly other) issues. You said you were working on them, then I see the note that BETA2 was tagged

Re: [HACKERS] Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...

2003-08-30 Thread Larry Rosenman
still can't --enable-thread-safety due to the code in thread.c. I'll shut up now. LER -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749

Re: [HACKERS] Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...

2003-08-30 Thread Larry Rosenman
break more platforms. Actually, we **ONLY** have getpwuid_r, not gethostbyname_r nor strerror_r LER -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749

Re: [HACKERS] Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...

2003-08-30 Thread Larry Rosenman
are making it HARD. Because one patch wasn't committed before we tar'd up a new beta? no, because the SCO/IBM/RED HAT lawsuits keep getting thrown in my face everytime I ask for UnixWare specific changes. LER -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812

Re: [HACKERS] Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...

2003-08-30 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Saturday, August 30, 2003 00:35:10 -0300 Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, Larry Rosenman wrote: --On Saturday, August 30, 2003 00:19:49 -0300 Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So be it, but I was under the impression that the fix would

Re: Unixware Patch (Was: Re: [HACKERS] Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)

2003-08-30 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Saturday, August 30, 2003 00:57:45 -0300 Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, Larry Rosenman wrote: Index: src/port/thread.c === RCS file: /projects/cvsroot/pgsql-server/src/port/thread.c,v

Re: Unixware Patch (Was: Re: [HACKERS] Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)

2003-08-30 Thread Larry Rosenman
, so we will use getpwuid_r in the ENABLE_THREADS case. UnixWare does NOT have strerror_r nor does it have gethostbyname_r, and the libc versions are reentrant in libc, for those 2. We need to use getpwuid_r for threaded apps. Does this clarify things? LER -- Larry Rosenman

Re: Unixware Patch (Was: Re: [HACKERS] Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)

2003-08-30 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Saturday, August 30, 2003 00:17:41 -0400 Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Larry Rosenman wrote: --On Saturday, August 30, 2003 01:09:54 -0300 Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 'K, but why the change to NEEDS_REENTRANT_FUNC_NAMES in the first place? The thing that has

Re: Unixware Patch (Was: Re: [HACKERS] Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)

2003-08-30 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Saturday, August 30, 2003 00:51:01 -0400 Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Larry Rosenman wrote: Yes, and that is the complex part because _some_ non-*_r functions are thread-safe, and some are not. I have to determine if we have other such platforms before I figure out how

Re: [HACKERS] dns prob

2003-08-31 Thread Larry Rosenman
postgresql.org. $ --On Sunday, August 31, 2003 22:18:40 +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there a problem with DNS? a few hours ago, www.fr.postgresql.org was not defined, now that it works again, ftp.fr.postgresql.org dosn't exist -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler

Re: [HACKERS] dns prob

2003-08-31 Thread Larry Rosenman
A 194.250.190.252 www2 --On Sunday, August 31, 2003 15:27:19 -0500 Larry Rosenman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Looks like Marc's script removed it $ cd /var/adm/named/cache $ grep ftp.fr postgresql.org $ ls -l postgresql.org -rw-r--r--1 root sys8517 Aug

Re: [HACKERS] Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)

2003-09-01 Thread Larry Rosenman
like to see a thread-safe libpq. -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749 ---(end of broadcast

Re: [HACKERS] Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)

2003-09-01 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Monday, September 01, 2003 13:11:25 -0400 Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Larry Rosenman wrote: --On Monday, September 01, 2003 12:35:43 -0400 Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Um. I don't think that's true. I mean, in theory it's true, but in practice why would an OS

Re: [HACKERS] Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)

2003-09-01 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Monday, September 01, 2003 14:24:14 -0300 Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote: Larry Rosenman wrote: --On Monday, September 01, 2003 12:35:43 -0400 Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Um. I don't think that's true. I mean

Re: [HACKERS] Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)

2003-09-01 Thread Larry Rosenman
lane -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749 ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9

Re: [HACKERS] Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)

2003-09-01 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Monday, September 01, 2003 22:02:00 +0100 Lee Kindness [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Larry Rosenman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: then how do we *PROVE* thread-safety on a particular platform? You're not going to be able to prove it anyway! which is my point. L. -- Larry Rosenman

Re: [HACKERS] Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)

2003-09-02 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Tuesday, September 02, 2003 00:04:35 -0400 Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Larry Rosenman wrote: Oh, interesting. So you are saying that if the OS supports threads, then we use the *_r if they have them, and assume the non *_r functions are already thread-safe if they don't

Re: [HACKERS] Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)

2003-09-02 Thread Larry Rosenman
can't assume because a *_r function is missing that the normal function is thread-safe. So, given that UnixWare doesn't have gethostbyname_r and strerror_r, but does have getpwuid_r, will y'all declare that UnixWare has thread-safety? My vote is YES. LER -- Larry Rosenman

Re: [HACKERS] Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)

2003-09-02 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Tuesday, September 02, 2003 11:32:08 -0400 Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Larry Rosenman wrote: Where does it say that you have to use getpwuid_r() to be thread safe? I don't see any mention in the docs. It does say about getpwuid: For getpwent, getpwuid, getpwnam

Re: [HACKERS] Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)

2003-09-02 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Tuesday, September 02, 2003 11:35:25 -0400 Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Larry Rosenman wrote: --On Tuesday, September 02, 2003 11:20:14 -0400 Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Peter Eisentraut wrote: Lee Kindness writes: You don't... and you simply shouldn't care

Re: [HACKERS] Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)

2003-09-02 Thread Larry Rosenman
the getpwuid_r() function? LER -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749 ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1

Re: [HACKERS] Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)

2003-09-02 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Tuesday, September 02, 2003 18:12:48 -0400 Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Larry Rosenman wrote: --On Tuesday, September 02, 2003 19:53:38 +0200 Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Lee Kindness writes: Bruce Momjian writes: Right. We can't assume because a *_r

Re: [HACKERS] Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)

2003-09-02 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Tuesday, September 02, 2003 18:32:03 -0400 Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Larry Rosenman wrote: Bruce Momjian writes: Right. We can't assume because a *_r function is missing that the normal function is thread-safe. That's not our concern - if the OS isn't thread

Re: [HACKERS] Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)

2003-09-03 Thread Larry Rosenman
this program and report back the results. -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749 ---(end of broadcast

Re: [HACKERS] Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)

2003-09-03 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Wednesday, September 03, 2003 17:09:49 -0400 Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Larry Rosenman wrote: --On Wednesday, September 03, 2003 16:51:51 -0400 Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Larry Rosenman wrote: From UnixWare: $ cc -O -Kpthread test_thread.c -o test_thread

Re: [HACKERS] Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)

2003-09-03 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Wednesday, September 03, 2003 16:51:51 -0400 Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Larry Rosenman wrote: From UnixWare: $ cc -O -Kpthread test_thread.c -o test_thread -lsocket -lnsl UX:acomp: WARNING: test_thread.c, line 60: argument #3 incompatible with prototype: pthread_create

Re: [HACKERS] Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)

2003-09-03 Thread Larry Rosenman
Can you pass me what's in CVS (anon hasn't updated afaict). And, what didn't you like about my version? LER --On Wednesday, September 03, 2003 18:35:44 -0400 Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Larry Rosenman wrote: What does your OS want for the 3rd argument of pthread_create()? I

[HACKERS] ANONCVS? Is it being updated correctly?

2003-09-03 Thread Larry Rosenman
Today's commits from Bruce don't seem to be there. I'm doing: cvs update -d -P (I sent another note to Marc as a safety). LER -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive

Re: [HACKERS] ANONCVS? Is it being updated correctly?

2003-09-03 Thread Larry Rosenman
that help? Nope. I'm still not seeing Bruce's changes for the threads stuff nor the added tools files. :-( LER On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Larry Rosenman wrote: Today's commits from Bruce don't seem to be there. I'm doing: cvs update -d -P (I sent another note to Marc as a safety). LER -- Larry

Re: [HACKERS] ANONCVS? Is it being updated correctly?

2003-09-03 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Wednesday, September 03, 2003 23:34:09 -0500 Larry Rosenman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --On Thursday, September 04, 2003 01:26:29 -0300 Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: everything looks okay on teh server ...the script is set to run hourly, and there aren't any log files

Re: [HACKERS] ANONCVS? Is it being updated correctly?

2003-09-04 Thread Larry Rosenman
in repository `/projects/cvsroot/pgsql-server' cvs [server aborted]: read lock failed - giving up $ On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Larry Rosenman wrote: --On Thursday, September 04, 2003 01:26:29 -0300 Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: everything looks okay on teh server ...the script is set

Re: [HACKERS] ANONCVS? Is it being updated correctly?

2003-09-04 Thread Larry Rosenman
`/projects/cvsroot/pgsql-server' cvs [server aborted]: read lock failed - giving up $ On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Larry Rosenman wrote: --On Thursday, September 04, 2003 01:26:29 -0300 Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: everything looks okay on teh server ...the script is set to run hourly

Re: [HACKERS] ANONCVS? Is it being updated correctly?

2003-09-04 Thread Larry Rosenman
if that helps ... ? The src/tools/test_thread stuff, Added files: src/tools : test_thread_funcs.c I'll try a full checkout. LER On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Larry Rosenman wrote: I still did NOT pick up any changes :-( Would you like an account on my box or do I need to do a full checkout? LER

Re: [HACKERS] ANONCVS? Is it being updated correctly?

2003-09-04 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Thursday, September 04, 2003 13:39:44 -0500 Larry Rosenman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --On Thursday, September 04, 2003 15:35:48 -0300 Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: k, which file specifically are you expecting a change in? as I said, the changes to pltcl.c that tom did today

Re: [HACKERS] ANONCVS? Is it being updated correctly?

2003-09-05 Thread Larry Rosenman
know if it happens again, that's all ... Will do. Thanks for the fix(es). LER -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Warning for missing createlang

2003-09-05 Thread Larry Rosenman
seem to me to be a good thing(tm) to have it in. LER -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749 pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

[HACKERS] UnixWare patches placed on my www site

2003-08-31 Thread Larry Rosenman
. this will allow us to NOT have to muck with LD_LIBRARY_PATH nor symlinks out of /usr/lib/ These are against today's CVS. LER -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland

Re: [HACKERS] Unixware 713 probs

2003-09-07 Thread Larry Rosenman
416 is: int32 s_addr; s_addr is seen by the compiler as: uint32 __S_un . __S_addr ; We need to pick another name. LER -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail: 1905 Steamboat

Re: [HACKERS] Unixware 713 probs

2003-09-07 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Sunday, September 07, 2003 12:52:18 -0700 Stephan Szabo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 7 Sep 2003, Larry Rosenman wrote: --On Sunday, September 07, 2003 20:22:30 +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] /usr/local/bin/gmake -C libpq all gmake[3]: Entering directory `/home/postgres

Re: [HACKERS] Unixware 713 probs

2003-09-07 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Sunday, September 07, 2003 14:19:00 -0500 Larry Rosenman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --On Sunday, September 07, 2003 20:22:30 +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] /usr/local/bin/gmake -C libpq all gmake[3]: Entering directory `/home/postgres/pgsql/src/backend/libpq' cc -O -Kinline

Re: [HACKERS] __cpu__ defines

2003-09-12 Thread Larry Rosenman
to Tom, since he seems to be the spinlock maintainer. LER -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749 pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [HACKERS] Need NetBSD thread tester

2003-09-12 Thread Larry Rosenman
or directory $ locate pthread.h $ -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749 pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [HACKERS] Need NetBSD thread tester

2003-09-12 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Friday, September 12, 2003 13:03:33 -0400 Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Larry Rosenman wrote: -- Start of PGP signed section. --On Friday, September 12, 2003 12:18:52 -0400 Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I need someone running NetBSD to read the top of src/tools

Re: [HACKERS] Need NetBSD thread tester

2003-09-12 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Friday, September 12, 2003 13:30:38 -0400 Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Larry Rosenman wrote: Wow, that is strange. Someone else told me NetBSD supports threads, and doesn't need any special compile flags, but of course, it has to have pthread.h to support threads. NetBSD

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Reorganization of spinlock defines

2003-09-11 Thread Larry Rosenman
v7.4? Bruce sent me a copy of the patch, and it BREAKS UnixWare (If y'all care). LER -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749 pgp0

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Reorganization of spinlock defines

2003-09-11 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Thursday, September 11, 2003 23:13:54 -0400 Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Larry Rosenman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Bruce sent me a copy of the patch, and it BREAKS UnixWare (If y'all= =20 care). Unfixably? Or just a small oversight? I'm actually not worried about platforms

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Reorganization of spinlock defines

2003-09-11 Thread Larry Rosenman
64-bit UnixWare. :-) (announced at SCOForum). regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html -- Larry Rosenman http

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Reorganization of spinlock defines

2003-09-11 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Friday, September 12, 2003 00:06:49 -0400 Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Larry Rosenman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I've already sent a whine-a-gram to the compiler guys at SCO. Prolly you thought of this already, but: getting them to *add* an implicit #define of __i386__ should

[HACKERS] Link.shared help

2003-09-13 Thread Larry Rosenman
notice the problem since I have a 7.4 install in my normal prefix. -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749 pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [HACKERS] initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql)

2003-09-26 Thread Larry Rosenman
this with a database. -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749 pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [HACKERS] expanding on syslog help

2003-09-30 Thread Larry Rosenman
cleanly -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749 pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [HACKERS] [Fwd: [Python-Dev] HP Test Drive systems]

2003-10-09 Thread Larry Rosenman
, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting. +1-503-222-2783 - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.commandprompt.com Editor-N-Chief - PostgreSQl.Org - http://www.postgresql.org ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster -- Larry Rosenman

Re: [HACKERS] pg_ctl reload - is it safe?

2003-10-14 Thread Larry Rosenman
of broadcast)--- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs

[HACKERS] Why do I get -g with this config?

2003-10-24 Thread Larry Rosenman
/local/include --with-libs=/usr/local/lib \ --with-tcl --with-tclconfig=/usr/local/lib \ --with-tkconfig=/usr/local/lib --enable-locale \ --enable-thread-safety -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL

[HACKERS] Port Reports: UnixWare/Failure/Priviledge Test

2003-10-25 Thread Larry Rosenman
5 7.1.3 i386 x86at SCO UNIX_SVR5 $ -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749 pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [HACKERS] Call for port reports

2003-10-25 Thread Larry Rosenman
it clean and remove just -O2. We also get -g on UnixWare cc (NOT gcc) builds, which we didn't before, which means we do NOT get optimization (UnixWare's cc doesn't like -O and -g together). LER -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812

Re: [HACKERS] Call for port reports

2003-10-25 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Saturday, October 25, 2003 10:14:14 -0400 Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Larry Rosenman wrote: After further consideration, I think that the recent patch series that tried to centralize the CFLAGS handling in configure should be reverted to configure.in revision 1.293

Re: [HACKERS] Call for port reports

2003-10-25 Thread Larry Rosenman
== -- Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Larry Rosenman http

Re: [HACKERS] Call for port reports

2003-10-25 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Saturday, October 25, 2003 22:29:04 +0200 Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Larry Rosenman writes: *** ./expected/privileges.out Thu Oct 9 20:49:31 2003 --- ./results/privileges.outSat Oct 25 12:04:45 2003 *** *** 247,253 (1 row) CREATE FUNCTION

[HACKERS] Regression Test Failure/UnixWare

2003-10-26 Thread Larry Rosenman
SESSION AUTHORIZATION regressuser3; SELECT testfunc1(5); -- fail ERROR: permission denied for function testfunc1 --- 247,252 == -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812

Re: [HACKERS] Open items

2003-10-27 Thread Larry Rosenman
way. Can anyone offer new arguments pro or con here? regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send unregister YourEmailAddressHere to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -- Larry Rosenman

Re: [HACKERS] Port Reports: UnixWare/Failure/Priviledge Test

2003-10-29 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Wednesday, October 29, 2003 15:49:53 -0500 Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Larry Rosenman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: --On Wednesday, October 29, 2003 15:26:39 -0500 Tom Lane=20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] Is this a bug, or is it correct-per-spec behavior? It's surely likely

Re: [HACKERS] Port Reports: UnixWare/Failure/Priviledge Test

2003-10-30 Thread Larry Rosenman
, they cannot. It seems to me that a superuser SHOULD be able to affect ANY permissions on ANY object in the DB. [snip] -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland

[HACKERS] SCO released UP3 today... (fwd)

2003-10-30 Thread Larry Rosenman
I didn't see this come back in, so, I'm resending it. LER Forwarded Message Date: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 22:26:43 -0600 From: Larry Rosenman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: PostgreSQL Hackers Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: SCO released UP3 today... which means

[HACKERS] Regression Failure: CURRENT SOURCES/unionjoin

2003-10-31 Thread Larry Rosenman
-+---+---+---+ | 0 | | zero | | 1 | 4 | one | -1 | 2 | 3 | two | 4 + | 2 | 3 | two | 2 | 3 | 2 | three | -3 | 4 | 1 | four | | 5 | 0 | five | -5 == -- Larry Rosenman

[HACKERS] Port Report: UnixWare

2003-11-02 Thread Larry Rosenman
| 4 | 1 | four | | 5 | 0 | five | -5 == $ Can we mark UnixWare ok for 7.4 with these? Or re-write the test to NOT fail? LER -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812

Re: [HACKERS] That EXPLAIN ANALYZE patch still needs work

2006-06-08 Thread Larry Rosenman
: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.00GHz hw.ncpu: 4 hw.byteorder: 1234 hw.physmem: 4286132224 hw.usermem: 4003151872 hw.pagesize: 4096 hw.floatingpoint: 1 hw.machine_arch: amd64 hw.realmem: 5368709120 [snip] the database is 8.1.4 -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1

Re: [HACKERS] That EXPLAIN ANALYZE patch still needs work

2006-06-09 Thread Larry Rosenman
) on FreeBSD/amd64, Dual Xeon's in HTT mode help? What can I do to further the investigation? It has 8.1.4 on it. LER -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 512-248-2683 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org US Mail: 430 Valona Loop, Round Rock, TX 78681-3893

Re: [HACKERS] Test request for Stats collector performance improvement

2006-06-15 Thread Larry Rosenman
on a dual-xeon in 64-bit mode. HTT *IS* enabled. LER -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 512-248-2683 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org US Mail: 430 Valona Loop, Round Rock, TX 78681-3683 US ---(end of broadcast

Re: [HACKERS] [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions

2006-06-22 Thread Larry Rosenman
. LER -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 512-248-2683 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org US Mail: 430 Valona Loop, Round Rock, TX 78681-3893 ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your

Re: Anyone still care about Cygwin? (was Re: [HACKERS] [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions)

2006-06-23 Thread Larry Rosenman
on the host for this? I might be able to use either my house machine or my work desktop here @pervasive, or one of my test boxes here @pervasive. -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 512-248-2683 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org US Mail: 430 Valona Loop

Re: [HACKERS] Change in Pervasive's PostgreSQL strategy

2006-07-25 Thread Larry Rosenman
about that. I'd like to echo Jim's sentiment. The last 9 months here have been great, and the community is still as wonderful as ever. I hope I've been a positive asset to both Pervasive and the community (mailing-list and IRC). -- Larry Rosenman Database Support Engineer PERVASIVE

Re: BugTracker (Was: Re: [HACKERS] 8.2 features status)

2006-08-15 Thread Larry Rosenman
I've used and use RT. It is web based for admin, but all the transactions are E-Mail based. http://www.bestpractical.com I can also make a test queue on my instance if someone wants to play. -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 512-248-2683

Re: [HACKERS] Autovacuum on by default?

2006-08-17 Thread Larry Rosenman
. -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 512-248-2683 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org US Mail: 430 Valona Loop, Round Rock, TX 78681-3893 ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner

Re: [HACKERS] Autovacuum on by default?

2006-08-17 Thread Larry Rosenman
Bruce Momjian wrote: Larry Rosenman wrote: Alvaro Herrera wrote: Bruce Momjian wrote: Matthew T. O'Connor wrote: Bruce Momjian wrote: Matthew T. O'Connor wrote: and increasing the log level when autovacuum actually fires off a VACUUM or ANALYZE command. This was not done because

Re: [HACKERS] Autovacuum on by default?

2006-08-17 Thread Larry Rosenman
, delete) since the last stats reset, then the vacuum info isn't recorded because we refuse to create the pgstat entry for the table. Do I need to write a Doc patch for that? It seemed consistent with other functions of the same class when I did the date patch. -- Larry Rosenman

Re: [HACKERS] Autovacuum on by default?

2006-08-24 Thread Larry Rosenman
both autovacuum and manual vacuum as well as analyze (both from the Autovacuum daemon and manual). -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 512-248-2683 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org US Mail: 430 Valona Loop, Round Rock, TX 78681-3893

Re: [HACKERS] gBorg status?

2006-09-02 Thread Larry Rosenman
No, since my time is up in the air at the moment, I've bowed out for now. Once I get settled at Surgient, I might take it up again, but not right now. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim C. Nasby Sent: Saturday, September 02, 2006 5:42

Re: [HACKERS] Sought after architectures for the PostgreSQL buildfarm?

2009-12-08 Thread Larry Rosenman
I might be able to help with: Sparc PA-Risc (HP-UX) IA64 -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 512-248-2683E-Mail: l...@lerctr.org US Mail: 430 Valona Loop, Round Rock, TX 78681-3893 -Original Message- From: pgsql-hackers-ow

Re: [HACKERS] 8.5 vs. 9.0

2010-01-21 Thread Larry Rosenman
AND Streaming Replication hit the tree, the release number would go to 9.0. Both are in the tree. -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 512-248-2683 E-Mail: l...@lerctr.org US Mail: 430 Valona Loop, Round Rock, TX 78681-3893 -- Sent via pgsql

[HACKERS] What X86/X64 OS's do we need coverage for?

2007-04-05 Thread Larry Rosenman
. What OS's do we need coverage for? LER -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 512-248-2683 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org US Mail: 430 Valona Loop, Round Rock, TX 78681-3893

Re: [HACKERS] What X86/X64 OS's do we need coverage for?

2007-04-05 Thread Larry Rosenman
I might use that as the base then, since the hardware finishes getting here tomorrow. My question still stands on what OS's we need coverage for. -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 512-248-2683 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org US Mail: 430 Valona

Re: [HACKERS] What X86/X64 OS's do we need coverage for?

2007-04-06 Thread Larry Rosenman
forget to increase your free space map settings -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 512-248-2683 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org US Mail: 430 Valona Loop, Round Rock, TX 78681-3893 ---(end of broadcast

Re: [HACKERS] What X86/X64 OS's do we need coverage for?

2007-04-06 Thread Larry Rosenman
On Fri, 6 Apr 2007, Andrew Dunstan wrote: Larry Rosenman wrote: It doesn't matter as far as MY box is concerned. I use VMWare extensively in my current $DAYJOB, and I want to be able to test/play with things related to that as well. The box I'm building will be using the (free) VMWare

Re: [HACKERS] What X86/X64 OS's do we need coverage for?

2007-04-06 Thread Larry Rosenman
On Fri, 6 Apr 2007, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: Andrew Dunstan wrote: Larry Rosenman wrote: It doesn't matter as far as MY box is concerned. I use VMWare extensively in my current $DAYJOB, and I want to be able to test/play with things related to that as well. The box I'm building

Re: [HACKERS] What X86/X64 OS's do we need coverage for?

2007-04-07 Thread Larry Rosenman
question is: 1) what os(s) do we need more coverage on 2) what collection of options for OS' in 1? LER -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 512-248-2683 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org US Mail: 430 Valona Loop, Round Rock, TX 78681-3893

Re: [HACKERS] What X86/X64 OS's do we need coverage for?

2007-04-09 Thread Larry Rosenman
on it. This will take a week or 2, but I have permission now. (This box can get out to the internet via our proxy). LER Cheers, Adrian Maier -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 512-248-2683 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org US Mail: 430 Valona Loop, Round Rock

Re: [HACKERS] What X86/X64 OS's do we need coverage for?

2007-04-09 Thread Larry Rosenman
On Mon, 9 Apr 2007, Tom Lane wrote: Larry Rosenman ler@lerctr.org writes: I think I'll be able to set up my HP-UX 11.11 box here, as soon as it gets fixed, and assuming either the bundled compiler will work or I can get GCC on it. If the bundled compiler is still the same non-ANSI-C weakling

[HACKERS] CREATE DATABASE foo OWNER bar

2007-04-16 Thread Larry Rosenman
owner. Shouldn't everything that is in the DB be owned by the purported owner? This is on 8.2.3, btw. Thanks! -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 512-248-2683E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail: 430 Valona Loop, Round Rock, TX 78681-3893

Re: [HACKERS] CREATE DATABASE foo OWNER bar

2007-04-16 Thread Larry Rosenman
On Mon, 16 Apr 2007, Andrew Dunstan wrote: Larry Rosenman wrote: Greetings, I think I found a bug, or at least a POLA violation. At work, I created a user that is NOT a superuser, nor can that user create databases. When I did a create database foo owner bar, all the schemas are set

Re: [HACKERS] CREATE DATABASE foo OWNER bar

2007-04-16 Thread Larry Rosenman
On Mon, 16 Apr 2007, Tom Lane wrote: Larry Rosenman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: When I try and RESTORE a pg_dump in the current state, we get errors because the public schema is owned by postgres, and the grant commands are issued as the user (since I'm restoring as the purported owner. That's

Re: [HACKERS] Rules: A Modest Proposal

2009-10-04 Thread Larry Rosenman
changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers -- Larry Rosenman http

[HACKERS] Makefile support for Mac OS X Fat Binaries?

2008-01-21 Thread Larry Rosenman
would the community accept a patch that would allow the making of 4-way fat binaries on Mac OS X 10.5+? (Obviously for 8.4+). I'm thinking about attempting it for an inside project here at work, but was wondering if there was community interest? Thanks! -- Larry Rosenman

Re: [HACKERS] Makefile support for Mac OS X Fat Binaries?

2008-01-21 Thread Larry Rosenman
On Mon, 21 Jan 2008, Tom Lane wrote: Larry Rosenman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: would the community accept a patch that would allow the making of 4-way fat binaries on Mac OS X 10.5+? (Obviously for 8.4+). Depends on how big and ugly it is, I think. If you can do it just by hacking CFLAGS

Re: [HACKERS] Makefile support for Mac OS X Fat Binaries?

2008-01-21 Thread Larry Rosenman
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008, Gregory Stark wrote: Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Larry Rosenman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: would the community accept a patch that would allow the making of 4-way fat binaries on Mac OS X 10.5+? (Obviously for 8.4+). Depends on how big and ugly it is, I think

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Fix for large file support (nonsegment mode support)

2008-03-11 Thread Larry Rosenman
, per filesystem. At least that was the case on SCO UnixWare (No, I no longer run it). LER regards, tom lane -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 512-248-2683 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail: 430 Valona Loop

Re: [HACKERS] BuildFarm: Do we need another FreeBSD/amd64 member?

2007-02-08 Thread Larry Rosenman
I can set up build farm on it if yall need it. Its running 6.2/amd64 --- Original Message --- From: Andrew Hammond [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Larry Rosenman ler@lerctr.org Sent: 2/8/07, 12:19:07 PM Subject: Re: BuildFarm: Do we need another FreeBSD/amd64 member? On Jan 19 2006, 9:36 pm

Re: [HACKERS] Possible Bug: high CPU usage for stats collector in 8.2

2007-03-02 Thread Larry Rosenman
. The stats collector CPU usage has dropped from inexcess of 95% to 5% Thanks. Any guess on when we'd see an 8.2.4? I have a business reason for asking. Thanks! -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 512-248-2683 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org US

[HACKERS] CLUSTER VERBOSE (9.1.3)

2012-03-05 Thread Larry Rosenman
versions in 4224437 pages DETAIL: 0 dead row versions cannot be removed yet. CPU 168.02s/4324.68u sec elapsed 8379.12 sec. And at this point it's doing something(tm), I assume re-doing the indexes. It would be nice(tm) to get more info. Ideas? - -- Larry Rosenman http

<    2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >