Russell Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Len, you've sent me mail directly; no problem. Yet I block on the DUL.
I think the reason you haven't had any problems is because your ISP
hasn't listed its dialups with the DUL.
Ah, that explains it! Well, bully for my ISP! They're cool for reasons
Another allows increasing the maximum number of
concurrent remotes beyond 250. The patch allows up to 500 but that limit
seems to be linux related.
I would imagine that to be because Linux by default only allows 1024 file
handles to be open at once. If each of the qmail-remotes has a
qmail Digest 8 May 2000 10:00:01 - Issue 995
Topics (messages 41252 through 41284):
Re: I am Panic!!!
41252 by: David Cunningham
Re: scan4virus
41253 by: octave klaba
41254 by: Warren J. Beckett
41255 by: Johan Almqvist
41256 by: Johan Almqvist
After 4 days of not being able to get Qmail working properly for me, I've
decided to completely wipe *every* trace of sendmail and *every* trace of
qmail on my system (Mandrake 7.02).. then install Qmail from scratch all
over again using "life with Qmail" suggestions.
I've noticed there is a
Hello.
Has anobody tried to use AVP with Scan4virus?
What do I have to change to make it use AVP?
Thanks.
Sorry if this is a double post.. but my first message hasn't come through
for 20 minutes. Don't know if the mail server is slow, or something went
wrong on my end.. but here it is again:
After 4 days of not being able to get Qmail working properly for me, I've
decided to completely wipe *every*
Can this be moved to [EMAIL PROTECTED]? (subscribers only
of course)
I'm sure the general Qmail population isn't that interested in this...
Jason Haar, author of scan4virus.
[to subscribe, email [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
[see http://www.geocities.com/jhaar/scan4virus]
--
Cheers
Jason Haar
On Sun, May 07, 2000 at 03:06:52PM +0200, Rainer Link wrote:
Sweep, H+B EDV AntiVir, KasperskyLabs AVP or F-Secure AV. If a infected
attachment is detected, the complete mail is moved to a quarantine
directory. It is then up to you, to clean a infected attachment with one
of the above
I can now use qmail's smtpd, but I have to manually start svscan by `cd
/var/qmail/svscan; /usr/local/bin/svscan ` (I used /var/qmail instead of /service),
with the help of scripts from "live with qmail", qmail get started by svscan, then I
use `/etc/init.d/qmail stop`, then `tcpserver
I am at the point of setting up my qmail-server as the mail-hub for my
organization. I have only used qmail for testing purposes so far and I am not
experienced with anti-spam techniques.
Now that I want to use my qmail-server in real life, there are many
other issues involved--like
hi folks,
I am just wondering if there is any frontend written for qmail
administrators who run only SMTP and POP3 services to allow users to easily
change their passwords through a browser?
Would appreciate any information.
Thanks!
Regards,
Isaiah Chua
On Sun, May 07, 2000 at 06:08:08PM -0700, Derek Briggs wrote:
The Lakers are very fortunate not to face a healthy SA. Duncan presents most
of the same problems as Webber offensively, plus he's better defensively.
Robinson is tougher than Vlade. And Avery Johnson isn't an idiot like
hi folks,
My qmail is currently running well for my company's email
addresses. However, I need to setup some mailboxes that will cater for staff of
our sister company, and I'm having problems with the virtual domains in
qmail.
My company's domain is abc.com (for e.g.), and they have some
Hi
try sending a mail to :
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 7 May 2000, Anthony Diaz wrote:
hi,
i want to unsubscribe to this service, whom should i
email to?
thanks.
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Send instant messages get email alerts with Yahoo!
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Sun, 7 May 2000 16:19:34 -0700 (PDT)
From: James [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Which version of Qmail to use?
Sorry if this is a double post.. but my first message hasn't come through
for 20 minutes. Don't know if the mail
Qmailers,
Today i got into work to be faced with a local queue of 17000 odd messages.
We were spammed by an american company who offered cheap university
diploma's.
Anyhow.. this is what i did to remove the messages and was wondering if
anyone has a better alternative:
1. killed qmail-send
2.
hi folks,
My qmail is currently running well for my company's email
addresses. However, I need to setup some mailboxes that will cater for staff of
our sister company, and I'm having problems with the virtual domains in
qmail.
My company's domain is abc.com (for e.g.), and they have some
messages are getting through.. this is just a test.
On Sun, May 07, 2000 at 01:17:13PM -0600, Steve Wolfe wrote:
Despite the docs at RedHat.com, saying how easy it is to
increase the file-handle limit on the new kernels, I found that
it simply didn't work. Editing the source and recompiling the
kernel (as you had to in older kernels) did the
"octave klaba" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mail. Make sure debugging is turned on, also.
I have nothing else in log :(
it looks like qmail is not using antivirus-qmail-queue.pl
I've followed this thread since I have the same problem, and I think you are
using antivir.qmail-queue.pl
Fact:
Have a look for »serialmail« at the qmail pages (www.qmail.org) or
even at http://cr.yp.to/serialmail.html
hth
Anton Pirnat
Ursprüngliche Nachricht
Am 07.05.00, 16:21:27, schrieb Tomasz Antczak [EMAIL PROTECTED] zum
Thema ETRN:
Hello. Is any way to add ETRN support for my qmail ? any
To unsubsribe just send an empty message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
hth
Anton Pirnat
--
this message is shareware, please register!
Ursprüngliche Nachricht
Am 07.05.00, 14:35:09, schrieb Anthony Diaz [EMAIL PROTECTED] zum Thema
how to stop subscription:
hi,
i want to unsubscribe to this
On Sun, May 07, 2000 at 03:19:20PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Russell Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Len, you've sent me mail directly; no problem. Yet I block on the DUL.
I think the reason you haven't had any problems is because your ISP
hasn't listed its dialups with the DUL.
QMAILQUEUE="/var/qmail/bin/antivirus-qmail-queue.pl" export
QMAILQUEUE
env - PATH="/var/qmail/bin:/usr/local/bin" \
tcpserver -H -R -x /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -c100 -u503 -g502 0 smtp \
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd 21 /dev/null
echo "smtp"
;;
James.
Best to use the source and compile qmail yourself.
get the qmail-1.03.tar.gz
Thank You
Tony Wade (Postmaster)
The Internet Solution
Tel:(+27 11) 283 5000
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#include std/disclaimer.h
-Original Message-
From: James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
John White wrote:
On Sun, May 07, 2000 at 06:08:08PM -0700, Derek Briggs wrote:
The Lakers are very fortunate not to face a healthy SA. Duncan presents most
of the same problems as Webber offensively, plus he's better defensively.
Robinson is tougher than Vlade. And Avery Johnson isn't
On Sun, 7 May 2000, James wrote:
Sorry if this is a double post.. but my first message hasn't come through
for 20 minutes. Don't know if the mail server is slow, or something went
wrong on my end.. but here it is again:
Something may have been down at uic. Mail seems to be flowing again.
On Mon, May 08, 2000 at 11:34:27AM +0900, Kristina wrote:
Now that I want to use my qmail-server in real life, there are many
other issues involved--like preventing my qmail server from being put on
the ORBS database. I have referred to the archives, however, there is much
heated discussion
At 11:34 AM +0900 5/8/00, Kristina wrote:
I am at the point of setting up my qmail-server as the mail-hub for my
organization. I have only used qmail for testing purposes so far and I am not
experienced with anti-spam techniques.
Now that I want to use my qmail-server in real life, there are
On Mon, May 08, 2000 at 01:37:21AM -0700, James wrote:
messages are getting through.. this is just a test.
This one is.
Greetz, Peter.
--
Peter van Dijk - student/sysadmin/ircoper/madly in love/pretending coder
|
| 'C makes it easy to shoot yourself in the foot;
| C++ makes it harder, but
Peter van Dijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not listing themselves in the DUL gives other ISPs _not_ the choice of
rejecting dial up mail from them.
...rejecting all of my mail, for example. I have no problem resisting
stupidity by not volunteering information.
Casting it as a choice issue is a
On Mon, May 08, 2000 at 08:17:58AM -0400, Len Budney wrote:
Peter van Dijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not listing themselves in the DUL gives other ISPs _not_ the choice of
rejecting dial up mail from them.
...rejecting all of my mail, for example. I have no problem resisting
stupidity
Hi,
I'm trying to write some scripts, and my script add lines to smtproutes, I
believe qmail must be restarted when you do this, yes?
When I run the rc script with the 'stop' option, it seems to take AGES
giving me stuff like this:
last qmail log line [957788665.031323 status: local 0/80
On Fri, May 05, 2000 at 05:14:46PM -0600,
Steve Wolfe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
there should be no need to "hack" qmail
And there isn't! Why do people persist on insecure MUAs?
I'll chime in on this, even though my view may not be the same as
everyone else's.
The problem
On Fri, May 05, 2000 at 05:14:46PM -0600,
Steve Wolfe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I sent my analysis of the "iloveyou" virus to BugTraq, I was
deluged with email - all of them bounces. Because my message started with
"ilove you", many, many mail servers had blocked it. That was
Jonathan McDowell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, May 05, 2000 at 05:20:25PM -0700, Chris Hanlon wrote:
Is there anyway to restrict which users/groups can execute commands
via the | option in there .qmail file? I realise that the problem
could be solved by not giving users access to the
At 13:32 8.05.2000, Tim Gollschewsky wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to write some scripts, and my script add lines to smtproutes,
I
believe qmail must be restarted when you do this, yes?
No, smtproutes is read by qmail-remote each time it is spawned, so you
don't need to restart. Hopefully this
I am using the Amavis wrapper with Mcaffee's amti virus. Seems to work
great for me. The install was also a snap. Good luck!
Steve P.
- Original Message -
From: "Andrés" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, May 06, 2000 6:02 PM
Subject: Anti-virus
Hello.
I've
And his ISP won't. :) Especially since I was a dial-up user when the
whole "block the dial-ups" discussion started and was adamant that it was
a mistake. :) If one of our users SPAMs, regardless of how, and we are
notified, they lose their account. It's that simple and it is very
effective, I
Dave Sill [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'll be suprised if the next version of qmail doesn't have better
support for filtering/processing messages. DJB is good at addressing
users needs in subsequent releases. Look at the development of
DNScache or the early qmail days for two examples.
I think
Len Budney [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[ the DUL ]
Casting it as a choice issue is a red herring. For example, what about
my ISPs privacy right? It's nobody's business what runs behind a given
IP. Should they also list OS and version, plus modem make and model, in
the cracker phoneboook?
On
Hello, I'm tunning a high volume smtp server, I'm trying to get more than
120 remote delivery simultaneos, I touched the control file
"concurrencyremote " with the value 300, but remote procs. don't go more
than 120. there is a "hardcoded" limit with this parameter ?
Thank you.
RDA.-
It's not even that hard, that was the first time I had ever fiddled
with
the Kernel source. We went to 4096, which should allow for quite a few
qmail-remotes. : )
Do you have any feel for how to evaluate what is an optimum number of
remotes? At 400 remotes I still have 80% CPU idle time.
The problem isn't MUA's. The problem is that users were duped
into
executing a program of a malicious intent.
I disagree. The problem is that Microsoft markets their systems to people
who don't know what they are doing, but includes features in them that
make it easy for the same
When I sent my analysis of the "iloveyou" virus to BugTraq, I was
deluged with email - all of them bounces. Because my message started
with
"ilove you", many, many mail servers had blocked it. That was within
something like 12 hours of the release. Think of the immense amount of
The documentation of RedHat.com is technically accurate, just not
complete. There are two limits. One is the total number of
files handles for all processes. This is adjustable through
/proc/sys/fs/file-max. The other limit is the number of file
handles opened by a single process. This
On May 07 2000, Bob Rogers wrote:
I think that should have pretty much taken care of reinstallation.
You will need to replace any system-wide aliases in the ~alias/
directory (e.g. for postmaster, root, abuse, etc.), though. And, if
I were you, I'd start it up by going through the testing
However, since this was 12 hours after the initial attack, it was a
reasonable response. My first server-based filter was a subject filter,
meant to stem the tide while I developed something a little better. Turns
out "something better" was easily implemented, but nowhere near as easy as
the 3
"Timothy L. Mayo" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And his ISP won't. :) Especially since I was a dial-up user when the
whole "block the dial-ups" discussion started...
I must say, I like my ISP! :) One of these days, I'll have to meet Tim
and buy him a beer.
Len.
--
P.S. ezmlm sent you some mail.
On Mon, May 08, 2000 at 10:56:43AM -0400, Bryan White wrote:
It's not even that hard, that was the first time I had ever fiddled
with
the Kernel source. We went to 4096, which should allow for quite a few
qmail-remotes. : )
Do you have any feel for how to evaluate what is an optimum
"Bryan White" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you have any feel for how to evaluate what is an optimum number of
remotes?
Measure the delivery rate at various settings of concurrencyremote.
Choose the setting that yields the highest delivery rate.
At 400 remotes I still have 80% CPU idle time.
"Ricardo D. Albano" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello, I'm tunning a high volume smtp server, I'm trying to get more than
120 remote delivery simultaneos, I touched the control file
"concurrencyremote " with the value 300, but remote procs. don't go more
than 120. there is a "hardcoded" limit
every once in a while, but rarely, i get "qmail-inject: illegal option -- B"
when handing off a mail for outbound delivery. the number is "100". i let
mail be handled by (this is .muttrc of mutt):
set sendmail="/var/qmail/bin/qmail-inject" # how2deliver
set sendmail_wait=15
=nothing=
Title: VIRUS WARNING!!!
SUBJECT: ILOVEYOU
YOU MUST DELETE IT BEFORE OPEN, ESPECIALLY IF YOUR OS IS WINDOWS !
Title: VIRUS WARNING!!!
LOL,
Your a little late on this one!
Bryan Hundven
- Original Message -
From:
R.Ilker
Gokhan
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2000 2:07
AM
Subject: VIRUS WARNING!!!
SUBJECT: ILOVEYOU
YOU
Considering the recent spate of VB bourne virii, please don't post using
active-content-enabled formats, like HTML.
-Original Message-
From: Bryan Hundven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 08, 2000 12:16 PM
To: R.Ilker Gokhan; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:
On Mon, May 08, 2000 at 06:14:49PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
every once in a while, but rarely, i get "qmail-inject: illegal option -- B"
when handing off a mail for outbound delivery. the number is "100". i let
mail be handled by (this is .muttrc of mutt):
Well, there is no string
On Mon, May 08, 2000 at 06:14:49PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
every once in a while, but rarely, i get "qmail-inject: illegal option -- B"
when handing off a mail for outbound delivery. the number is "100". i let
mail be handled by (this is .muttrc of mutt):
Well, there is no string
If you notice.. The date on the mail is Thursday... Some mailer somewhere
held it up in transit it would appear..
Matt Soffen
Web Intranet Developer
http://www.iso-ne.com/
==
Boss- "My boss says we need some eunuch programmers."
Yes, in the past the concurrencyremote was in "40", when I changed to 300
the remote procs. go up to 120, but no more 120. :(
RDA.-
-Original Message-
From: Johan Almqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ricardo D. Albano [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Monday, May 08, 2000 12:54 PM
Subject: Re: More
Read then modify conf-spawn in the qmail sources, re-compile, re-install, restart.
On Mon, May 08, 2000 at 03:35:59PM -0300, Ricardo D. Albano wrote:
Yes, in the past the concurrencyremote was in "40", when I changed to 300
the remote procs. go up to 120, but no more 120. :(
RDA.-
Hi,
I'm wondering if qmail will also lowercase the non-ASCII (or, "high
ASCII", 8bit) characters in local email addresses? For example, if
I create ~alias/.qmail-mikko:hänninen, will this catch both
mikko.hänninen@myserver and MIKKO.HÄNNINEN@myserver, or do I need to
have two .qmail files?
I
On Mon, May 08, 2000 at 09:49:22PM +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
Hi,
I'm wondering if qmail will also lowercase the non-ASCII (or, "high
ASCII", 8bit) characters in local email addresses? For example, if
I create ~alias/.qmail-mikko:hänninen, will this catch both
mikko.hänninen@myserver
On Mon, May 08, 2000 at 09:49:22PM +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
Hi,
I'm wondering if qmail will also lowercase the non-ASCII (or, "high
ASCII", 8bit) characters in local email addresses? For example, if
I create ~alias/.qmail-mikko:hänninen, will this catch both
mikko.hänninen@myserver
This work fine, but for a max of 255. How can I Increment up to 1000 for
example ??, this is not a joke, I really need tons of remote delivery
threads!
A concurrency of 255 is not suficcient for my server.
RDA.-
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
On Mon, May 08, 2000 at 04:12:23PM -0300, Ricardo D. Albano wrote:
This work fine, but for a max of 255. How can I Increment up to 1000 for
example ??, this is not a joke, I really need tons of remote delivery
threads!
A concurrency of 255 is not suficcient for my server.
Run
Title: VIRUS WARNING!!!
Thanks
for the heads up. Any news on the impending release of Windows 3.1
?
-Original Message-From: R.Ilker Gokhan
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2000 4:07
AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: VIRUS
Tony Wade [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Best to use the source and compile qmail yourself.
get the qmail-1.03.tar.gz
On a Debian GNU/Linux system it can be painful to install from source
because of constraints imposed by the package management system dpkg.
Dpkg wants a mail transport agent
Peter van Dijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Mon, 08 May 2000:
This code only converts A-Z to a-z, all else is left alone.
Right, thanks for the answer. :-)
Yeah well since it doesn't support LOCALE 'n stuff, it can't now which
characters are special in your country.
Indeed, though it doesn't
Hi Ken
I had three lines in the assign file, and a single period for the last line.
I had added single period's after each line. But the problem still remains.
Kapil
You probably don't have a ending line with a single period
.
That is why qmail-newu is failing to compile. and without a
Hi. I've set up a family mailing list. When I send an email to the
mailing list server, the message is send out as From: me, where me is
the sender's email. I'd like responses to go to the mailing list, rather
than the sender. I was thinking of adding a Reply-To: to 'headeradd'
but I'm not
Hi,
I noticed my name appears in one of the From: fields a couple messages up.
How could that happen? I don´t remember posting anything to this list.
greetings
Thilo
Hi,
Maybe I am missing the point, but I thought that only 7 bits ASCII
characters were legal in an email address...
Just as a side question, how do I type the following email address with my
standard US keyboard ? Mikko.Hä[EMAIL PROTECTED] ? More precisely how do I type
the "ä" ?
Please don't
At 03:35 PM 5/8/00 -0300, Ricardo D. Albano wrote:
Yes, in the past the concurrencyremote was in "40", when I changed to 300
the remote procs. go up to 120, but no more 120. :(
then you have to patch your qmail with big-concurrency-patch
find it at http://www.qmail.org/top.html
I wrote:
Dpkg wants a mail transport agent defined (by default our friend
sendmail, of course). ...
Oops, that's a mistake. The default MTA on Debian is exim.
-John
--
"God is a comedian playing to an audience too afraid to laugh."
- Voltaire
On Mon, May 08, 2000 at 10:37:55PM +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
Peter van Dijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Mon, 08 May 2000:
This code only converts A-Z to a-z, all else is left alone.
Right, thanks for the answer. :-)
Yeah well since it doesn't support LOCALE 'n stuff, it can't now
I just noticed that the qmail list server puts itself as a carbon-copy. Is
this preferred over a reply-to? In any event, how do I set this up?
On Mon, 8 May 2000, Eddy wrote:
OTRO VIRUS ESPANTOSO, PONGAN ATENCION:
ATENCION VIRUS
IBM y AOL acaban de informar que un nuevo Virus - WOBBLER - anda
suelto. Llegara en un E-mail titulado: "How to Give a Cat a Colonic".
IBM
y AOL
han anunciado que es MUY poderoso, mas que
Can anyone point me to the IETF RFC describing e-mail addresses
of the form david@[10.10.10.10] Although web pages refer to
this construction as a "821-compliant address" I found no discussion
of referring to hosts by anything other than names within 821.
--
"Lord Macbeth
Can you give a pointer to this patch (web page, source docs, how to,
etc)...?
RDA.-
-Original Message-
From: Peter van Dijk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Monday, May 08, 2000 4:17 PM
Subject: Re: More than 120 concurrencyremote
On Mon, May 08, 2000 at
On Mon, May 08, 2000 at 04:35:01PM -0500,
"David L. Nicol" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can anyone point me to the IETF RFC describing e-mail addresses
of the form david@[10.10.10.10] Although web pages refer to
this construction as a "821-compliant address" I found no discussion
of
On Mon, 8 May 2000, David L. Nicol wrote:
Can anyone point me to the IETF RFC describing e-mail addresses
of the form david@[10.10.10.10] Although web pages refer to
this construction as a "821-compliant address" I found no discussion
of referring to hosts by anything other than names
Could we possibly get this in english?
Please?
Thanx in advance,
Bryan Hundven
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Hector Tinoco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 08, 2000 2:20 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FW: FW: VIRUS PEOR QUE MELISSA II *** Importante***
On Mon, 8 May 2000, Soffen, Matthew wrote:
If you notice.. The date on the mail is Thursday... Some mailer somewhere
held it up in transit it would appear..
Or the date on his computer is wrong... :-)
Andy
-
+- Andy --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -+
| Great
Not very useful. You can ignore it!
JES
- Original Message -
From: "Bryan Hundven" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Hector Tinoco" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 08, 2000 5:52 PM
Subject: RE: FW: FW: VIRUS PEOR QUE MELISSA II *** Importante***
Could we possibly get this
On Mon, 8 May 2000, Bryan Hundven wrote:
Could we possibly get this in english?
Please?
Compliments of the babelfish (not perfect but you'll get the gist
of it):
ANOTHER FRIGHTFUL VIRUS, PUTS ATTENTION:
ATTENTION VIRUS
IBM and AOL finish
My guess, this is a hoax as outlined on some of the major virus protection
sites - The hoax states that IBM and AOL acknowledge the WOBBLER virus, it
is worse than Melissa, and that it destroys Netscape.
Jon Saunders
SECPA
-Original Message-
From: Hector Tinoco [mailto:[EMAIL
At 5/8/2000 02:52 PM -0700, Bryan Hundven wrote or quoted:
Could we possibly get this in english?
Please?
Very loose translation:
"There's a big, bad virus out there, which is even worse than Melissa. Be
very afraid. It will eat your hard drive, crash your aquarium, and max out
your credit
I think this therefore eloquently answers my previous question
and confirms my original feeling that it is a bad idea to post
virus warnings to this group.
- Original Message -
From: Kai MacTane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 08 May 2000 23:22
Subject: RE: FW: FW: VIRUS
Hello All,
I need to block my mail server from receiving anymore mail from
[EMAIL PROTECTED] inserting this into 'badmailfrom' in
/var/qmail/controls do what I want?
-Bill
At 5/8/2000 04:01 PM -0700, Bill Parker wrote or quoted:
I need to block my mail server from receiving anymore mail from
[EMAIL PROTECTED] inserting this into 'badmailfrom' in
/var/qmail/controls do what I want?
Sure will. You don't even need to restart anything, as badmailfrom is read
by
Kai MacTane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IOW, this is one of the standard hoax email virus warnings that's been
littering the Internet for past six years or more, only translated into
Spanish.
You mean, I can't find out how to give my cat a colonic?
Len.
--
Frugal Tip #31:
Incrementally
At 06:41 PM 5/8/00 -0300, Ricardo D. Albano wrote:
Can you give a pointer to this patch (web page, source docs, how to,
etc)...?
http://www.qmail.org/big-concurrency.patch
On Mon, May 08, 2000 at 12:44:30AM +0200, Andrés wrote:
Hello.
Has anobody tried to use AVP with Scan4virus?
What do I have to change to make it use AVP?
Next release (0.50) will have support for it.
Yes, that's a big jump in versions - scan4virus now supports Email header
matching as well
I am having a hard time setting up Qmail on a FreeBSD4.0 machine and was
wondering if there was anyone on this list that I could correspond with that
is running a similar build. My goal is to set up a mail server with POP3
that will support around 100,000 pop boxes. Although I have read the
At 06:03 PM 5/8/00 -0700, Robert Blaylock wrote:
Qmail-1.03 (When I telnet to localhost port 25 I get "421 unable to read
controls (#4.3.0)"
you have to do ./config-fast your.host.name from your qmail instalation dir
UCSPI-TCP 0.88 (I compiled it and now I am not sure what to do!) I read in
Hi all,
Just getting conflicting information here.. i know badmailfrom and badrcptto
work with the standard qmail-smtpd, but do i need to patch with anything to
get the badmailpattern file to work as well?
I'm assuming yes, as i put in a string into
/var/qmail/control/badmailpattern and it
On 09-May-2000, Marc-Adrian Napoli wrote:
Just getting conflicting information here.. i know badmailfrom and badrcptto
work with the standard qmail-smtpd,
Hmm, AFAIK badrcptto is not standard qmail feature either.
I think both patches are available from qmail.org
Ronny
Cool Stuff Ken... Thanks...
No No don't go away, now my one problem is solved i.e users/assign, by
doing what you said.
I am able to send+recieve the mails using sqwebmail. But when I use outlook
express or Netscape messenger it gives me error
There was a problem logging onto your mail server.
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Mikko_H=E4nninen?= [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 21:49:22 +0300
. . .
And yes, I know it's not a good idea to use 8bit characters in the
email addresses. I'm not planning to use these addresses except as a
safety catch in case someone happens to
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo
