* Steve Fulton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The US Secret Service uses a formula devised by a psyciatrist to
determine the danger level someone poses by their use of exclamation
marks. Specifically, the number of exclamation marks they use to make
a point. So, I suggest that this list filter
grrr either you have an old syslogd man page or you can't rtfm well!
e.g if you specify
mail.* -/var/adm/maillog
you have an unsynced maillog
it will work faster but unreliable for sudden power failures!
next time please post your questions to the list and not to my
personal mailbox, as
Hi,
while trying to compile Bruce's qlogtools-package on my FreeBSD-Box I
get the error-message:
gcc -g -o -multitail
gcc: No input files specified
*** Error code 1
gmake is installed.
any hints?
/ch
Rainer Link wrote:
Dale Herring wrote:
Does anyone else use the linavx scanning software from AVP? I did find a
Note: AVX is not AVP ! See http://www.avp.ch/E/avpqa.htm for details.
AVX is from a company I never heard in the past.
was it. Are there any other scanners that will
Am 20.01.2001 um 12:01:10 schrieb Clemens Hermann:
Hi,
sorry, I used the wrong make but now it does not work anyway:
gmake: *** No rules to make target 'qlogselect', needed by 'all'. Stop.
what is wrong? on my Debian it compiles perfect but not under FreeBSD
/ch
Steve Fulton wrote:
I've searched the archives extensively, and I've learned quite a lot, but
I'd like advice on this question:
Assuming RAID 1+0 is not an option (due to the expense), what level of
RAID is best for storing /Maildir's on a file server (that will be
accessible to the SMTP
qmail Digest 20 Jan 2001 11:00:01 - Issue 1250
Topics (messages 55586 through 55653):
Re: mutt configuration
55586 by: Jorge Bras
55588 by: James Raftery
Re: tcpserver question (OT)
55587 by: Alex Pennace
55597 by: Paul Jarc
55628 by: Mario Thaten
Chris Johnson writes:
Try adding -l0 (that's ell zero) to your tcpserver options. That'll keep your
server from trying to look up its own name.
I agree that DNS reverse lookup for the local host name on
startup is not necessary in normal situations.
But it may be worth mentioning that
Boz Crowther writes:
what I see is that the mailer doesn't include header information
specified on the command line after it gets the go ahead to send DATA,
although MAIL FROM and RCPT TO are correctly specified.
[...]
Is there a fixcrio-like utility out there that will correct
Can i force to use mail.ndsoftware.net ?
Because i have now ns1.ndsoftware.net !
If yes how ?
Thanks
Nicolas DEFFAYET, NDSoftware
http://www.ndsoftware.net - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
France: Tel +33 671887502 - Fax N/A
UK: Tel +44 8453348750 - Fax +44 8453348751
USA: Tel N/A - Fax N/A
-Original
Hi,
I am trying to install open-smtp4 to enable pop
before smtp. Its posing a few problems by not writing the remote ip into the
file /etc/smtp.filter.newer. It only writes
":allow,RELAYCLIENT=//" into the file. I have
changed tcpmakectl to tcp rules in pop3-record .
Can someone give me
Hello,
Strange thing:
viper:~ # qmail-mrtg-queue
39
2
viper:~ # qmHandle -s
Messages in local queue: 0
Messages in remote queue: 4
Well :) And there are some (different) messages in the queue, so
I guess that qmail-mrtg-queue is right, and qmHandle wrong.
Maybe somebody noticed that too ?
On 20 Jan 2001, at 11:24, Stefan Laudat wrote:
grrr either you have an old syslogd man page or you can't rtfm well!
I have Redhat 6.2 and rtfm for quite a while before I quesioned
you.It mentions the - flag for buffered writes, but it doens't give an
example of it. I loath experimenting on a
You have the two confused..
qmail-mrtg-queue returns number of messages in the queue and number of
message unprocessed in the queue.
qmhandle is returning concurrency for local and remote..
Sean
- Original Message -
From: "Olivier M." [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "QMail List" [EMAIL
On Sat, Jan 20, 2001 at 11:24:15AM +0200, Stefan Laudat wrote:
grrr either you have an old syslogd man page or you can't rtfm well!
e.g if you specify
mail.*-/var/adm/maillog
you have an unsynced maillog
Hopefully he previous identified the OS because, eg, Solaris does not
Thanks all who have answered my questions so far. You
have been very helpful.
I'm running into a much stranger problem now. I'm
trying to set up Qmail under TCPServer, optimally with
POP access. I've installed the TCPServer program and
checkpassword (which tests out great) as per online
Hi,
I am trying to install open-smtp4 to enable pop
before smtp. Its posing a few problems by not writing the remote ip into the
file /etc/smtp.filter.newer. It only writes
":allow,RELAYCLIENT=//" into the file. I have
changed tcpmakectl to tcp rules in pop3-record .
Can someone give me
On Sat, Jan 20, 2001 at 12:28:30PM -0800, Alex Le Fevre wrote:
The last part of my /etc/rc reads:
# Alternatively, on some architectures, xdm may be
started in /etc/ttys.
if [ "X${xdm_flags}" != X"NO" ]; then
echo 'starting xdm...';
/usr/X11R6/bin/xdm ${xdm_flags}
fi
Hi,
Can you send me a qmail-queue patched for use with qmail-scanner, because i
have patched qmail-queue but the 2 files have the same size !
Thanks
Nicolas DEFFAYET, NDSoftware
http://www.ndsoftware.net - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
France: Tel +33 671887502 - Fax N/A
UK: Tel +44 8453348750 - Fax +44
Duh! Thanks.
One remaining question: shouldn't those show up in my
process list if I do a ps ax? I ask because I tried
setting up the account in Outlook Express on a Windows
machine, and when it tried to connect, it got a socket
error.
Thanks,
Alex
--- Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Jan 20, 2001 at 01:14:34PM -0800, Alex Le Fevre wrote:
Duh! Thanks.
One remaining question: shouldn't those show up in my
process list if I do a ps ax?
Yes. One supervise process per service, plus the app itself (mostly
something like tcpserver [options] qmail-anything), normally
What is qmail concurrency ?
It's normal ?
http://mrtg.ndsoftware.net/concurrency.html
http://mrtg.ndsoftware.net/messstatus.html
Thanks
Nicolas DEFFAYET, NDSoftware
http://www.ndsoftware.net - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
France: Tel +33 671887502 - Fax N/A
UK: Tel +44 8453348750 - Fax +44 8453348751
USA:
Hello
In discusion - regard to Maildir versus mailbox question - for
promoting Maidir were is useful to encourage pine authors to
adapting the pine program for directly work with Maildir fromat.
Pine, as I think, is most popular software in Unix for mail
reading/writing. If the new version were
On Sat, Jan 20, 2001 at 11:41:01PM +0100, NDSoftware wrote:
What is qmail concurrency ?
It's normal ?
aie, yes. read the manual...
--
Henning Brauer | BS Web Services
Hostmaster BSWS| Roedingsmarkt 14
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | 20459 Hamburg
http://www.bsws.de | Germany
Am 20.01.2001 um 23:41:01 schrieb NDSoftware:
Hi Nicolas
What is qmail concurrency ?
it is a non-standard control file introduced in LifeWithQmail. It is
used in the tcpserver call. It specifies the maximum numbers of the
qmail-smtpd processes that can run simultaniously. If not specified
On Sat, Jan 20, 2001 at 10:42:11PM -, Piotr Kasztelowicz wrote:
In discusion - regard to Maildir versus mailbox question - for
promoting Maidir were is useful to encourage pine authors to
adapting the pine program for directly work with Maildir fromat.
maybe you find this useful, I don't.
On Sun, Jan 21, 2001 at 01:09:35AM +0100, Clemens Hermann wrote:
What is qmail concurrency ?
it is a non-standard control file
wrong. there are concurrencylocal and concurrencyremote, both standard
control files.
It specifies the maximum numbers of the
qmail-smtpd processes that can run
Am 20.01.2001 um 22:05:42 schrieb NDSoftware:
Hi,
Hi Nicolas,
Can you send me a qmail-queue patched for use with qmail-scanner,
why don't we try to get it to run on your computer? It might not be a
good idea to take a program from someone you do not know, sent to you per
mail. You can
Am 21.01.2001 um 00:19:14 schrieb Henning Brauer:
Hi Henning,
What is qmail concurrency ?
it is a non-standard control file
wrong. there are concurrencylocal and concurrencyremote, both standard
control files.
sorry, I mixed up concurrency and concurrencyincomming. Taken this, at
Hello
Pine is a rotten bunch of crap.
So make better functionaly and intuitionaly software
as pine :-)
Piotr
---
Piotr Kasztelowicz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[http://www.am.torun.pl/~pekasz]
Hello
Maybe you just don't spend enough effort to understand mutt, but I won't
This is the good opportunity to make functionality of Mutt better.
I let to see to much porblems and this is reason, that I don't use
Mutt with plesure.
Piotr
---
Piotr Kasztelowicz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Jan 21, 2001 at 12:20:05AM +0100, Robin S. Socha wrote:
* Piotr Kasztelowicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Pine, as I think, is most popular software in Unix for mail
reading/writing.
Pine is a rotten bunch of crap.
find pine4.21 -type f | xargs egrep '(sprintf|strcpy|strcat)' |
On Sat, Jan 20, 2001 at 11:44:08PM -, Piotr Kasztelowicz wrote:
Pine is a rotten bunch of crap.
So make better functionaly and intuitionaly software
as pine :-)
If "functionaly and intuitiomaly" counts more then security for you, you
might want to check outlook and windooze.
sorry.
Thus spake Henning Brauer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
exit 0
^^
everything behind exit will never be executed. exit 0 should be the last
line in your script.
# Starts Apache Web Server
/usr/local/apache/bin/apachectl start
# Starts Qmail Under TCPSERVER
tcpserver -v -u 1010 -g
On Sun, Jan 21, 2001 at 12:12:55AM +0100, Henning Brauer wrote:
Maybe you just don't spend enough effort to understand mutt, but I won't
start a MUA discussion here. If you want pine to support Maildirs natively
(mutt does btw) contact the pine authors, this is _ways_ OT here.
The author of
On Sat, Jan 20, 2001 at 11:45:31PM +, Piotr Kasztelowicz wrote:
Hello
Maybe you just don't spend enough effort to understand mutt, but I won't
This is the good opportunity to make functionality of Mutt better.
I let to see to much porblems and this is reason, that I don't use
Mutt
i've had lots of problems with mutt concerned its sorting. i've
consistently seen mutt think messages from november 28th interpreted as
being from january 4th, 2002, as an example. weird things like that.
that's simply unacceptable to me.
plus the whole idiotic self-quoting thing on the top
* Adam McKenna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, Jan 20, 2001 at 11:45:31PM +, Piotr Kasztelowicz wrote:
This is the good opportunity to make functionality of Mutt better. I
let to see to much porblems and this is reason, that I don't use Mutt
with plesure.
Are you using babelfish to
* Piotr Kasztelowicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Pine is a rotten bunch of crap.
So make better functionaly and intuitionaly software as pine :-)
May I introduce myself? I am /the/ Robin S. Socha, horror of
news:comp.mail.pine and founding member of the nancyboys (also of cmp
fame). Which part
Hello
take a few days for most pine users to make the switch.
I will not say, that mutt is not-useful, but it could be better :-)
For me - the first problem is how make, that the sent mail shall
be placed in sent folder - Neverless it don't me simple :-(
and I have to less time to sacrificate
For some strange reason, I occassionally
receive bounce-backs (i.e. Returned mail: )
that have a double To: field in the headers...
e.g.:
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is obviously wrong and gives qmail a headache.
Instead of parsing the incoming bounce-back
to a
I am running OpenBSD 2.7 and I just installed qmail. I am able to
recieve e-mail just fine, but when attempting to send e-mail as in step
5 of TEST.deliver I use:
echo to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | /var/qmail/bin/qmail-inject
and the log reports:
Jan 20 12:54:29 mail qmail: 980024069.412360 new
On Sat, 20 Jan 2001 20:24:05 -0500 (EST),
Piotr Kasztelowicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
P I will not say, that mutt is not-useful, but it could be better :-) For
P me - the first problem is how make, that the sent mail shall be placed
P in sent folder.
If you want a copy of all your sent
On Sat, Jan 20, 2001 at 09:56:27PM -0500, Karl Vogel wrote:
On Sat, 20 Jan 2001 20:24:05 -0500 (EST),
Piotr Kasztelowicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
P I will not say, that mutt is not-useful, but it could be better :-) For
P me - the first problem is how make, that the sent mail shall be
I had a working Qmail setup where email was delivered to local accounts and
I decided to change to a single UID POP toaster approach. I read Paul
Greggs paper on setting it up, but for some reason, it's still not working.
I can check my email, so I know the POP portion is working, but whenver
On Sat, Jan 20, 2001 at 08:55:14PM -0500, Jeff Bolle wrote:
[...]
Jan 20 12:54:30 mail qmail: 980024070.874084 delivery 14: failure:
Sorry,_I_couldn't_find_any_host_named_bucknell.edu._(#5.1.2)/
[...]
This machine is currently using register.com's domain servers in
resolv.conf.
You should
Evening folks.
I'm running into the CNAMEs error that everyone else seems to have trouble
with at some point in time. I have Bruce's qmail-patch18 version of qmail
(which includes the big-dns patch) but I'm still having quiet a lot of
trouble. Here's an example:
- LOG FOR NEW MESSAGE -
Jan
On Sun, Jan 21, 2001 at 12:26:09AM -0600, Peder Angvall wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Sorry. Although I'm listed as a best-preference MX or A for that host,
I've taken webscripting.net out of the locals file (like the document says)
and it is now empty.
The virtualhosts file has:
On Sat, Jan 20, 2001 at 08:02:51PM -0500, tc lewis wrote:
i've had lots of problems with mutt concerned its sorting. i've
consistently seen mutt think messages from november 28th interpreted as
being from january 4th, 2002, as an example. weird things like that.
that's simply unacceptable
On Sun, 21 Jan 2001, Alex Pennace wrote:
On Sat, Jan 20, 2001 at 08:02:51PM -0500, tc lewis wrote:
i've had lots of problems with mutt concerned its sorting. i've
consistently seen mutt think messages from november 28th interpreted as
being from january 4th, 2002, as an example. weird
50 matches
Mail list logo
