I am probably going to start a flame war with this but I have created a
patch for qmail 1.03 which removes the need for compiled in user and
group id's.
The patch works by replacing the auto_uida variables with #defines which
call functions to return the correct uid. Once the user id has been
Title: RE: Portable RPM for qmail
1. That HAS been done before, Bruce Guenter has created a similar patch
2. Q-Mail's license does NOT allow distribution of binary packages including Q-Mail.
P.S. Please forgive the signature and HTML that this e-mail has in it, unfortunately due to the
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 04:33:43PM +1000, John Newbigin wrote:
My second question is about the licence for qmail. Despite all my
looking I can't find it. Can someone point me to the licence or
summarise what I can do with a binary RPM.
URL:http://cr.yp.to/distributors.html
Vince.
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 10:42:26AM +0530, D Rajesh wrote:
Hi there,
I have done the conf-split configuration and after make setup It created
directory /var/qmail. I have moved the original /var/qmail to /var/qmail2
before the make setup. After finishing the installation, I have started
I have followed the below steps to run separate qmail's at /var/qmail and
/var/qmail2
My system is a Linux 6.2 kernel 2.2.14, ext2fs
1.. # killall qmail-send ( stopped qmail daemon. )
2.. # mv /var/qmail /var/qmail2.
3.. # cd /usr/src/qmail-1.03
4.. # vi conf-qmail ( Changed
Hi,
I came across a web based
administration tool for qmail called qmailadmin on www.inter7.com/qmailadmin . Has
anyone any experience of this?? Is it any good??
P.
On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 02:43:15PM +1200, Steve Reed wrote:
So, I'm stumped. Why is config (or config-fast) unhappy?
Because it's expecting dirs and stuff in /var/qmail that aren't there.
Run strings - install | grep / and look for a fully-qualified path
(ie. starting with a slash) that
Hi, I have the following in control/badmailfrom as shown by qmail-showctl:
badmailfrom:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] not accepted in MAIL FROM.
Hahaha [EMAIL PROTECTED] not accepted in MAIL FROM.
Yet messages with the following headers still get through:
--- Below this line is the original bounce.
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 10:09:00AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, I have the following in control/badmailfrom as shown by qmail-showctl:
badmailfrom:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] not accepted in MAIL FROM.
Hahaha [EMAIL PROTECTED] not accepted in MAIL FROM.
Yet messages with the following
2.- I've tried checkpassword but it did't work ;( I could't
auth users ...
You didn't configure it properly, then. But with an error
report like that,
not even Russell can help you :).
you are right ..
qmail-1.03
checkpassword-0.90
I tried the auth examples of the checkpassword
I think you're confused. From the man page for quotacheck:
Quotacheck should be run each time the system boots and mounts
non-valid file systems. This is most likely to happen
after a system
crash.
qmail won't be running that early in the boot, so it's not an issue.
Unless the network is lying to me again, peter green said:
* Brett Randall [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010626 21:49]:
Chris == Chris Bolt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
perl -e 'while(){$_=~tr/A-Za-z/N-ZA-Mn-za-m/;print}'
Then paste the email :-)
Or, a bit shorter,
$ tr 'a-zA-Z'
* Alan Clegg [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010627 09:22]:
Unless the network is lying to me again, peter green said:
* Brett Randall [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010626 21:49]:
Chris == Chris Bolt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
perl -e 'while(){$_=~tr/A-Za-z/N-ZA-Mn-za-m/;print}'
Then paste the email
* peter green [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010627 08:32]:
(pcg@pcg2) ~ rot13
bash: rot13: command not found
(robin@mail1):(~)$ man caesar | head -n4
CAESAR(6) OpenBSD Reference Manual CAESAR(6)
NAME
caesar - decrypt caesar cyphers
I had a similar problem. Without going into the details, mine was caused by
the proxy dropping the connection. Have you tried snoop to watch the
packets spray to test for errors with netstat?
Just a thought...
-Mike
-Original Message-
From: Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
* Robin S. Socha [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010627 09:42]:
* peter green [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010627 08:32]:
(pcg@pcg2) ~ rot13
bash: rot13: command not found
(robin@mail1):(~)$ man caesar | head -n4
(pcg@pcg2) ~ caesar
bash: caesar: command not found
Next? :-)
/pg
--
Peter Green : Architekton
Amanda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In particular I'd like to terminate with extreme prejudice the message that
says something to the effect of, Hi. This is the
[...]
Please don't. That message has a very specific format, to allow it to be
recognized and parsed automatically. The format is
On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Felix von Leitner wrote:
I'm asking because I consider porting qmail to IPv6.
Before someone tells me: I know KAME did a patch. I am not satisfied
with their work.
Felix
I dread thinking about all the work IPv6 is going to cause. But we can't
slow progress. Yes, I
pop corn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FQDN is very clear if the Unix host is serving a single domain. However,
what is recommended if the host is serving multiple virtual domains?
The POP3 server should identify itself by it's real/canonical name, not by one
of its virtualdomains -- although
Awie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I plan to have a SMTP proxy that using qmail. Our main mail server is MS
Exchange that not secure enough for SMTP gateway.
Would you give me suggestion what should I install ? and what configuration
should I do?
See Life with qmail, lifewithqmail.org. It's
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 09:47:26AM -0400, peter green wrote:
* Robin S. Socha [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010627 09:42]:
* peter green [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010627 08:32]:
(pcg@pcg2) ~ rot13
bash: rot13: command not found
(robin@mail1):(~)$ man caesar | head -n4
(pcg@pcg2) ~ caesar
bash:
eddy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, when I used my qmail smtp for send an email it show error
The connection to the server has failed. Account: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]',
Server: 'tiger.test.com', Protocol: SMTP, Port: 25, Secure(SSL): No, Socket
Error: 10060, Error Number: 0x800CCC0E
I take it this
* Chris Bolt [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010627 02:01]:
perl -e 'while(){$_=~tr/A-Za-z/N-ZA-Mn-za-m/;print}'
perl -pe'y/a-zA-Z/n-za-mN-ZA-M/'
-Johan
--
Johan Almqvist
http://www.almqvist.net/johan/qmail/
PGP signature
* Charles Cazabon [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010627 09:56]:
Amanda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In particular I'd like to terminate with extreme prejudice the message that
says something to the effect of, Hi. This is the
[...]
Please don't. That message has a very specific format, to allow it to
http://www.samag.com/articles/1997/9706/9706d/9706d.htm
I'm glad this is a slow week.
(Yahoo search keywords - caesar, encryption, unix)
-Mike
-Original Message-
From: peter green [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 9:47 AM
To: Qmail List
Subject: Re: Peter
John Newbigin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am probably going to start a flame war with this but I have created a
patch for qmail 1.03 which removes the need for compiled in user and
group id's.
The patch works by replacing the auto_uida variables with #defines which
call functions to return
Just open the email in Netscape Messenger, right-mouse on the body and click
unscramble [ROT-13].
Brain.
peter green wrote:
* Robin S. Socha [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010627 09:42]:
* peter green [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010627 08:32]:
(pcg@pcg2) ~ rot13
bash: rot13: command not found
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 10:01:44AM -0400, peter green wrote:
[snip]
What is actually parsing that format these days? I can appreciate
forward-looking policies like qsbmf, but that doesn't exactly fly with
customers all of the time. What can I point to as a definite reason (*now*)
to keep
Title: RE: Alter bounce messages?
I'm looking for this same information, and although it has been answered earlier (edit the qmail-send.c file), I'll state what problem I'm trying to solve.
I have a lot of users who are not English speaking, and I get a lot of replies to my bounce messages
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 04:06:16PM +0200, Sebastiaan van Erk wrote:
Hi there,
Is it possible to override the databytes value in the control/databytes
file based on the _destination_ of the email. I know how to change the
DATABYTES environment variable using tcpwrappers or tcpserver based on
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 10:42:40AM +0100, pat moffatt wrote:
I came across a web based administration tool for qmail called qmailadmin on
www.inter7.com/qmailadmin . Has anyone any experience of this?? Is it any good??
It is very good. We give all of our webhosting clients access to it,
peter green([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2001.06.27 09:47:26 +:
* Robin S. Socha [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010627 09:42]:
* peter green [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010627 08:32]:
(pcg@pcg2) ~ rot13
bash: rot13: command not found
(robin@mail1):(~)$ man caesar | head -n4
(pcg@pcg2) ~ caesar
bash:
You guys are making this way too hard...
Copy the text, go to http://world.altavista.com/tr
and paste it in the translate to... box.
Then choose Garbage to English and click on Translate
Poof! You get it back translated into English garbage :)
-Original Message-
From: Mike Peppard
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 08:07:35AM -0500, Norvell Spearman wrote:
I'm probably confused; I've never set quotas on a Linux server before.
Did you check out the other man pages listed in the SEE ALSO section of
the quotacheck man page? If you didn't, you should have -- you would then
have
That didn't seem to do, apparently, I checked the correct functionality of our DNS and
so on.
Although in my log quote I used fake addresses those were just slightly changed. The
usual protect the innocent (not from the
regulars from this list, of course).
Actually I do remember obtaining one
peter green [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please don't. That message has a very specific format, to allow it to be
recognized and parsed automatically. The format is documented at:
http://cr.yp.to/proto/qsbmf.txt
What is actually parsing that format these days? I can appreciate
If the filesystem isn't mounted, then qmail isn't going to be
delivering mail to it, is it?
So if I umount /home while qmail is up, will qmail barf or simply wait for
/home to be remounted?
To run quotacheck, you should probably go to
single user mode,
unmount all unnecessary filesystems,
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 10:43:07AM -0400, Mark Douglas wrote:
If I leave the original bounce message in place, and just translate it and
add my comments at the bottom, would that still be acceptable for QSBMF?
Only if you append it to the intro paragraph (ie. no blank lines in
between). As
Mark Douglas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a lot of users who are not English speaking, and I get a lot of
replies to my bounce messages from them to MAILER-DAEMON asking what the
hell the message says. I'd like to include a translated version of the
message in the bounce message, as well
Hi,
The qmail-ldap patch contains support for a control/custombouncetext.
$ cat custombouncetext
This is a test, your message bounced.
SSH Communications Security
This will produce bounces like so:
-
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at ssh.com.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver
Alfonso Armenta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Although in my log quote I used fake addresses those were just slightly
changed. The usual protect the innocent (not from the regulars from this
list, of course).
Actually I do remember obtaining one of those messages and log entries when
I tried
Title: RE: Alter bounce messages?
peter green [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please don't. That message has a very specific format, to allow it to be
recognized and parsed automatically. The format is documented at:
http://cr.yp.to/proto/qsbmf.txt
What is actually parsing that format
Norvell Spearman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If the filesystem isn't mounted, then qmail isn't going to be
delivering mail to it, is it?
So if I umount /home while qmail is up, will qmail barf or simply wait for
/home to be remounted?
You still don't get it. Running quotacheck is something
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 10:38:28AM -0500, Norvell Spearman wrote:
I know single user mode would be best; I could do the quota stuff late at
night. But what would happen if mail comes to the server and qmail isn't
running? Does it simply bounce back to the sender, does the originating
smtp
-Original Message-
From: Awie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 3:29 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SMTP Proxy
Hi all,
hi
I plan to have a SMTP proxy that using qmail.
good idea
Our main mail server is MS Exchange that not secure enough for SMTP
gateway.
yes
Did you check out the other man pages listed in the SEE ALSO section of
the quotacheck man page? If you didn't, you should have -- you would then
have discovered exactly what creates the quota.{user,group} files. (Hint:
They're created when you turn quotas on.)
- Adrian
I must be reading
when i run relay-ctrl-age from cron or command line, i get #
/usr/local/bin: Permission denied
I've checked the permissions, from cron its run as root. The only files it
should be using in /usr/local/bin is tcprules
is this behavior normal? or have I got a few things screwed up?
Thanks in
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 10:33:32AM -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote:
Alfonso Armenta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Although in my log quote I used fake addresses those were just slightly
changed. The usual protect the innocent (not from the regulars from this
list, of course).
Actually I do
No unfortunately I do not, it would make life a lot easier if that was all
that was wrong. The way the system is set up the admins have logins in a
real /etc/passwd on the machine, then there is an ldap server that
provides information on the 'users'.
The admins in the /etc/passwd file can
I had posted a question earlier regarding a problem sending mail to
SMTP. I have a snippet below from recordio when I send a message body
containgn 123 . The last few lines of the SMTP transaction produced
by Outlook ..
Jun 26 07:42:33 fs1 smtpd: 993566553.076015 13548 X-MimeOLE:
-Original Message-
From: Todd Grimes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 7:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Bruce Guenter's relay-ctrl
when i run relay-ctrl-age from cron or command line, i get #
/usr/local/bin: Permission denied
probably trying to
IMHO, single-user mode, unmount filesystem, set up quotas, back to
multiuser mode is probably your best bet. Your odds of losing any mail
during this transaction are extremely low, unless the sending mail
servers are totally useless...
Greg White
Thanks very much.
I would like to
I realize this is slightly off topic (relates to qmail indirectly), but
I though some of the people on this list might be able help me a bit.
I'm attempting to setup a failover nfs server with 2 machines. They
will have a shared scsi bus between them with 2 raid controllers for
redundancy.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The qmail-ldap patch contains support for a control/custombouncetext.
$ cat custombouncetext
This is a test, your message bounced.
SSH Communications Security
This will produce bounces like so:
-
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at ssh.com.
I'm afraid I
Todd Grimes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
when i run relay-ctrl-age from cron or command line, i get #
/usr/local/bin: Permission denied
Do you have a space between /usr/local/bin and relay-ctrl-age or some other
program in your cron script?
Please post your script here (copy paste, NOT
Andrew J Herbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The admins in the /etc/passwd file can receive mail, but the users on the
LDAP server can't.
However if I run qmail-getpw from the command line it retrieves the users
information no problem, same as with the admins. The permissions on the
I was running qmail-pop3d from inetd on FreeBSD 4.3 with no problems
getting my mail. I took a suggestion and moved to running it under
tcpserver. Now using the same username and password I get a -ERR
authorization failed.
qmail-pop3d start script:
#!/bin/sh
exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit
Perry Macdonald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had posted a question earlier regarding a problem sending mail to
SMTP. I have a snippet below from recordio when I send a message body
containgn 123 . The last few lines of the SMTP transaction produced
by Outlook ..
Jun 26 07:42:33 fs1
* * * * * root/usr/sbin/relay-ctrl-age
At 01:43 PM 6/27/2001 -0600, you wrote:
Todd Grimes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
when i run relay-ctrl-age from cron or command line, i get #
/usr/local/bin: Permission denied
Do you have a space between /usr/local/bin and
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 01:49:41PM -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote:
The fact the qmail-getpw seems to work is what confuses me.
You said you're not using qmail-users. Does qmail-LDAP still use qmail-getpw
then? If not, that would explain this, if you're actually using qmail-LDAP (I
can't
Russell Nelson wrote:
The problem, simply enough, is that you should try very, very hard not
to have a separate copy of the email on the disk. If you're running
qmail-inject on each message, then yes, three machines aren't going to
be enough. On the other hand, three machines of the
Well I think I may have located the source of the trouble but
it's still puzzling. Both the Life With Qmail and the Running
qmail book want the /var/qmail directory created while logged in
as root. That gives ownership to the user root in the group
root. Then, the qmail-specific groups and
Excuse me while I go bang my head against the wall. OK, there
now that that's over withhas anyone else had trouble
installing qmail on Mandrake 8?
I'm following the instructions to the letter and the darn thing
won't install. I'd much rather find the reason for it and fix
it than
What's is the best OS for run Qmail (and/or Ezmlm)? What advantage and
disadvantage has each one? I'll need send two millions mails per day and
I don't know what hard can I buy? :)
Thanks very much!
Hi,
I installed Mandrake using the 2 CDs, the latest distro
(downloaded the ISOs and burned the CDs). It seemed to install
perfectly fine.
I want to use qmail because it seems to have the best
reputation. Mandrake comes with Postfix, which I chose to not
install. From what I've read
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 09:22:02PM -0300, Federico Edelman Anaya wrote:
What's is the best OS for run Qmail (and/or Ezmlm)? What advantage and
disadvantage has each one? I'll need send two millions mails per day and
I don't know what hard can I buy? :)
go away, troll.
--Adam
I missed the original disucssion but I never saw a config file posted to
the archive so here's one.
Critiques of the following setup are welcome.
However please note **This is a small qmail site and I am very familiar
with tcpwappers already**
So arguments about reliability at very high
Just be careful about Linux because it has a maximum 2G file size (size for
a single file). This can get in the way of some search engines which build
large random-access files that exceed 2G. But it should not pose any kind
of a problem for mail, especially if MAILDIR format is used.
I
Just for the sake of argument I have a Mandrake 8 machine that runs qmail
fine with the directions from LWQ
I also have a Mandrake Cooker machine (pre8.1) that I installed qmail fine.
Nothing wierd, just word for word from LWQ.
Still I prefer debian but this was for a friend who likes the ease
What's is the best OS for run Qmail (and/or Ezmlm)? What advantage and
disadvantage has each one? I'll need send two millions mails per day and
I don't know what hard can I buy? :)
Solaris is slow to fork and qmail makes liberal use of that
call, so solaris is out of the question.
Well I guess that kind of puts the nail in the coffin. Mandrake
is supposed to be a top-notch distro - too bad they barfed all
over version 8. I'll go snag the 7.2 ISOs and start all over
again.
Good thing, this mailing list!
-Steve
I downloaded the ISO's and burned CDS for 7.2. I
Well I guess that kind of puts the nail in the coffin. Mandrake
is supposed to be a top-notch distro - too bad they barfed all
over version 8. I'll go snag the 7.2 ISOs and start all over
again.
Good thing, this mailing list!
-Steve
I downloaded the ISO's and burned CDS for 7.2. I
Well I guess that kind of puts the nail in the coffin. Mandrake
is supposed to be a top-notch distro - too bad they barfed all
over version 8. I'll go snag the 7.2 ISOs and start all over
again.
Good thing, this mailing list!
-Steve
I downloaded the ISO's and burned CDS for 7.2. I
Thanks Lucas Charles !
I will try.
Thx rgds,
Awie
- Original Message -
From: Charles Cazabon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 9:54 PM
Subject: Re: SMTP Proxy
Awie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I plan to have a SMTP proxy that using qmail. Our
Hello all-
Some background. I have a Qmail server running RedHat 7.0 version 1.03,
along with courier-imap 1.2.3 (just the IMAP part) + vpopmail 4.9.8. It is
off-site from our office, and for 130 days the whole email system has been
flawless, even through the 3 times our office has changed IPs.
1) Sounds good, I'll use the real, canonical name
2) I didn't realize the password replacement could do all that work by
itself. It apparently doesn't need the vmailmgrd daemon to run?
3) I agree that the pop3 clients can be configured to leave things on the
server. It's reassuring to know
1) Sounds good, I'll use the real, canonical name
2) I didn't realize the password replacement could do all that work by
itself. It apparently doesn't need the vmailmgrd daemon to run?
3) I agree that the pop3 clients can be configured to leave things on the
server. It's reassuring to know
On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 01:03:37PM +1200, Steve Reed wrote:
Well I guess that kind of puts the nail in the coffin. Mandrake
is supposed to be a top-notch distro
Er, since when?
--Adam
Hmmm...I wonder why my Mandrake 8 install won't cooperate. I've
reloaded the OS a half dozen times, each time more careful than
the previous, and to make a long story short when you do the
make absolutely nothing goes into the /var/qmail directory. The
install basically goes nowhere. I
Hmmm...I wonder why my Mandrake 8 install won't cooperate. I've
reloaded the OS a half dozen times, each time more careful than
the previous, and to make a long story short when you do the
make absolutely nothing goes into the /var/qmail directory. The
install basically goes nowhere. I
Hmmm...I wonder why my Mandrake 8 install won't cooperate. I've
reloaded the OS a half dozen times, each time more careful than
the previous, and to make a long story short when you do the
make absolutely nothing goes into the /var/qmail directory. The
install basically goes nowhere. I
Hmmm...I wonder why my Mandrake 8 install won't cooperate. I've
reloaded the OS a half dozen times, each time more careful than
the previous, and to make a long story short when you do the
make absolutely nothing goes into the /var/qmail directory. The
install basically goes nowhere. I
You may distribute a precompiled package if
installing your package produces exactly the same files, in exactly
the same locations, that a user would obtain
by installing one of my packages listed above;
My RPM produces exactly the same file and directory structure with the
exception
I have qmail, qmail-smtpd, and qmail-pop3d running on my system, all in default
configurations (in /var/qmail/*, using daemontools/tcpserver, etc.). Qmail-pop3d is
nicely running and logging things, but qmail-smtpd is dumping all messages to the
console (tty1) - can anyone help me fix this?
I'm no expert, but since I've just been setting up my own qmail, some of
this is still freshly confusing for me! Did you remember to do all of the
following?
chmod +t /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-smtpd
chown qmaill:nofiles /var/log/qmail/smtpd
chmod 2700 /var/log/qmail/smtpd
chmod 755 (both of
I have my different daemons logging into the various log subdirectories via
multilog.
My problem now is integrating them so that I have a continuous line of
activity from the beginning to end for a given email.
For example, I can do a tail -f current log for qmail-pop3 while running
tests.
look for ISOQLOG nice
- Original Message -
From: pop corn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2001 10:00 AM
Subject: Integrating the logs
I have my different daemons logging into the various log subdirectories
via
multilog.
My problem now is integrating
Hi there,
Firstly, sorry for a long mail.
I have sent 30,000 mails to different domains like yahoo, hotmail, rediff
etc...
Before mentioning the problem the configuration that I have used in
qmailis as follows:-
qmail config
--
1.) Two qmails running at /var/qmail and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I understand that Free BSD and Linux are the overwhelming choices of
the
Internet pornography industry. That is a good technical figure of
merit,
because it means these servers are stable (for HTTP) when getting
lots and
lots of hits.
Actually, Linux and FreeBSD
I understand that Free BSD and Linux are the overwhelming choices of the
Internet pornography industry. That is a good technical figure of merit,
because it means these servers are stable (for HTTP) when getting lots and
lots of hits.
Actually, Linux and FreeBSD are the systems of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I understand that Free BSD and Linux are the overwhelming choices of
the
Internet pornography industry. That is a good technical figure of
merit,
because it means these servers are stable (for HTTP) when getting
lots and
lots of hits.
Actually, Linux
Does any know how to fix this error starting
svscan?
env: invalid option - - P
Try `env --help' for more information;
#!/bin/sh
PATH=$PATH:/usr/local/bin:/var/qmail/bincase
"$1" in
start) echo -n "Starting djb
services: svscan" cd
/service env - PATH="$PATH" svscan
echo $!
What does
echo $PATH
say?
On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Kevin Roberts wrote:
Does any know how to fix this error starting svscan?
env: invalid option - - P
Try `env --help' for more information;
#!/bin/sh
PATH=$PATH:/usr/local/bin:/var/qmail/bin
case $1 in
start)
echo
Umm..wasn't the 2G file limit fixed in the 2.0 kernels?
--- David T. Ashley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just be careful about Linux because it has a maximum 2G file size (size for
a single file). This can get in the way of some search engines which build
large random-access files that exceed
94 matches
Mail list logo
