#include imho.h
On Tue, Aug 14 2001, Jean-Christian Imbeault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My original plan was to install qmail - VMailMgr - Courrier-IMAP. But after
a little reading I find out that Courrier-IMAP has it own email server
implementation. So it seems that qmail is not needed?
I have installed VMailMgr on my system but I can't quite figure out how to
get the daemon up and running using svc. I'm on an OpenBSD2.9 system and all
the instruction I have found are for Linux and it's rc.d files and svc-start
options.
Can anyone tell me how to set up vmailmgr with svs so
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hello Jean-Christian,
Tuesday, August 14, 2001, 5:13:34 AM, you wrote:
My original plan was to install qmail - VMailMgr - Courrier-IMAP.
But after a little reading I find out that Courrier-IMAP has it own
email server implementation. So it seems that qmail
I think I have qmail up and running after following the instructions in lwq.
I am now trying the tests in TEST.deliver.
However I get an error at the first test, local-local delivery/
status: local 0/10 remote 0/20
starting delivery 1: msg 508836 to local [EMAIL PROTECTED]
status: local 1/10
* Jean-Christian Imbeault [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010813 08:25]:
I think I have qmail up and running after following the instructions in lwq.
I am now trying the tests in TEST.deliver.
However I get an error at the first test, local-local delivery/
Is this an error in my installationof qmail? Did
From: Johan Almqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes. Have you read
INSTALL.mbox
INSTALL.vsm
and INSTALL.maildir?
Just read those three documents and none of them say that I *have* to do
anything. Seems mostly like recommendation on what to do if you want to keep
using /var/spool/mail or to configure
I just recently switched from sendmail to qmail and I've noticed that my
process usage seems to be alot higher than it used to be. Below is a ps
incuding all the qmail processes. I don't transfer that much mail and
I've been told that Qmail is supposed to be better.. When I ran sendmail
my
* Jean-Christian Imbeault [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010813 09:15]:
Just read those three documents and none of them say that I *have* to do
anything. Seems mostly like recommendation on what to do if you want to keep
using /var/spool/mail or to configure MUA's to use Maildir.
Also this machien is
On Mon, Aug 13, 2001 at 10:24:36AM +, Jean-Christian Imbeault wrote:
However lwq is a little short on how to actually add POP3 user accounts. Can
anyone point me to some documentation on how to add POP3 users? (If this is
a FAQ or in lwq sorry for asking but I did look and couldn't find
yes, you for sure are right this questions are answered in a FAQ or lWQ
i guess ;)
qmail serves all unix users on your local system as .. umm local users
even :)
They have to have a home dir and a Maildir (depending on your setup
using LWQ) as regular unix have, thats how it works.
But, not
My original plan was to install qmail - VMailMgr - Courrier-IMAP. But after
a little reading I find out that Courrier-IMAP has it own email server
implementation. So it seems that qmail is not needed?
Am I right? If so what are the advantages/disadvantages to either using
qmail with the
Jean-Christian Imbeault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Mike Hodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote]
Another great resource is 'Life With Qmail' at www.lifewithqmail.org.
Got that already. But as I found out it's Linux-centric. I'll be installing
on OpenBSD and worse for me is that I don't know OpenBSD
[Mike Hodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote]
You most definately can use qmail for this.
Great!
Let me be honest with you though.. There are some tough cookies on the
qmail list who may and probably will flame you for asking this question,
and only answer you by reciting 'read this faq' or 'read
On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 06:52:29AM +, Jean-Christian Imbeault wrote:
[snip]
I know. I took my chances and posted anyway. And I *did* read the FAQ, it's
pretty slim and the man pages didn't install themselves automagically when I
compiled the source. (Yes, I don't even know how to install
On Wed, 08 Aug 2001 06:52:29 +, Jean-Christian Imbeault
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I'll have a look right away. But first I have to make sure I
actually installed qmail properly.
You should find that the tests in qmail-1.03/INSTALL should pretty
much show if qmail is working properly or
On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 08:59:06AM +0200, Peter van Dijk wrote:
On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 06:52:29AM +, Jean-Christian Imbeault wrote:
[...] the man pages didn't install themselves automagically when I
compiled the source. (Yes, I don't even know how to install man pages).
Are you sure
From: Robin S. Socha [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Are you sure you want to run a server?
I know what you are saying but uou have to start somewhere and learn somehow
...
I beg to differ. OpenBSD is quite fine (DJB himself certainly does not use
it for no good reason, eh?) and it has everything you need
On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 07:43:43AM +, Jean-Christian Imbeault wrote:
From: Robin S. Socha [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Are you sure you want to run a server?
I know what you are saying but uou have to start somewhere and learn
somehow
On a production system? Did you bring a Ferrari to your
On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 05:58:53AM +, Robert Sander wrote:
On 8 Aug 2001 07:01:31 +0200,
Jean-Christian Imbeault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Our office uses Windows and MS Outlook. Can Outlook work with qmail? Can
users just POP or IMAP off of qmail? Do I need another piece of software
On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 07:43:43AM +, Jean-Christian Imbeault wrote:
From: Robin S. Socha [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I beg to differ. OpenBSD is quite fine (DJB himself certainly does not use
it for no good reason, eh?) and it has everything you need as
ports and packages.
No ports yet for 2.9.
On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 02:22:15AM -0500, Robin S. Socha wrote:
On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 08:59:06AM +0200, Peter van Dijk wrote:
[snip]
The manpages do install themselves automatically. You just have to
tell man to check /var/qmail/man as well. (The way to do this is
OS-dependent).
Jean-Christian Imbeault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But after installing both the OS and qmail and going through the install
procedure it then hits me, is qmail the right tool? (shows how much I knew
before starting).
Our office uses Windows and MS Outlook. Can Outlook work with qmail? Can
First off please excuse the obviously-I-have-no-knowledge level of this
question.
I have been charged with installing a mail server at our office. Luckily for
me I know absolutely nothing about mail servers. I've decided to go with
OpenBSD 2.9 and qmail 1.03.
But after installing both the OS
On 8 Aug 2001 07:01:31 +0200,
Jean-Christian Imbeault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Our office uses Windows and MS Outlook. Can Outlook work with qmail? Can
users just POP or IMAP off of qmail? Do I need another piece of software to
link the two?
Let me answer this question quickly before Robin
Hi,
I have been looking around on the Inet to see if I could find anything about how I
secure qmail pop3 service, but I don't have a ??? and I don't find a ???..
I was wondering if anyone have some good ideas what to use or where I can find some
information about securing qmail pop3 etc.
qmail-pop3d is far secure..but using it with inet is not recommended...use
qmail-pop3d with tcpserver..check the FAQ regarding this...
regards
dushyanth
Hi,
I have been looking around on the Inet to see if I could find anything
about how I secure qmail pop3 service, but I don't have a ???
* Per-Fredrik Pollnow [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010726 09:40]:
I have been looking around on the Inet to see if I could find anything
about how I secure qmail pop3 service, but I don't have a ??? and I don't
find a ???..
I was wondering if anyone have some good ideas what to use or where I can
find
I'm completely new to qmail, and I've read the man pages on condredirect but
I'm having no luck getting this to work. If someone could please enlighten
me, I would be forever grateful.
Facts: I'm running qmail 1.03 on a RH 7.0 box.
Problem: I copied the following program into
Hi Joy,
The new script can be found on this link;
Make sure that you add the -i flags on all grep commands
so that it will not miss uppercase characters.
http://www.ornl.gov/its/archives/mailing-lists/qmail/2001/03/msg01041.html
The script includes the instructions on how to use it. Please
Roger Arnold wrote:
Hello All,
I am still a newbie with Qmail and I have a strange (to me) error that
is taking over the screen on a system that I need urgent help with as it
may be affecting various domains email reception and delivery.
The display is as follows:
popup: pid 2652 USER
popup
Roger Arnold wrote:
Hello All,
I am still a newbie with Qmail and I have a strange (to me) error that
is taking over the screen on a system that I need urgent help with as it
may be affecting various domains email reception and delivery.
The display is as follows:
popup: pid 2652 USER
popup
Trying again for the 3rd time to send this email to the Qmail list
Roger Arnold wrote:
Hello All,
I am still a newbie with Qmail and I have a strange (to me) error that
is taking over the screen on a system that I need urgent help with as it
may be affecting various domains email reception
On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 01:56:28AM +1000, arnie wrote:
Trying again for the 3rd time to send this email to the Qmail list
and we received it 3 times. the message you are getting is from a broken
subsribers mailserver sending a bounce to the address in From: instead of
the envelope sender.
--
arnie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am still a newbie with Qmail and I have a strange (to me) error that
is taking over the screen on a system that I need urgent help with as it
may be affecting various domains email reception and delivery.
The display is as follows:
I have no idea how
On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 06:01:02PM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 01:56:28AM +1000, arnie wrote:
Trying again for the 3rd time to send this email to the Qmail list
and we received it 3 times. the message you are getting is from a broken
subsribers mailserver sending a
Roger Arnold wrote:
Thanks to everyone that pointed out my misconception that the list was not
receiving the email that I sent 3 times. I was unaware of the broken
mailserver and thought that somehow my message was being diverted and not
getting to the list, and I apologise for my mistake
Thanks for your help - all of you. Based on your advice, I nixed xinetd and
tcpserver is happy as a clam - so it is reading its config files and
forwarding is working. If/when I need ssh, I'll set that up with tcpserver.
* Technology Strategic Planning Technology writes:
Nick (Keith) Fish [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Stephen Froehlich wrote:
Do you read your mail from bottom to top? If not, why do you start your
reply on top of the original mail?
In the near future, I'll need to allow encrypted remote access.
Config:
RedHat 7.1
qmail - 1.0.3
daemontools-0.70
dot-forward-0.71
ucspi-tcp-0.88
I'm having a helluva time figuring out how to allow my local hosts to relay
mail through the server. I put the proper line in hosts.allow (per the
FAQ), however, I'm not familiar enough with xinetd to do the other
OK, I'd like to also gather some opinions on how best to implement POP
and/or IMAP.
Here are my requirements:
In the immediate present, I just need to allow the local network to access.
In the near future, I'll need to allow encrypted remote access. (Encrypted
only.) I have a few, relatively
On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 12:43:24PM -0500, Stephen Froehlich wrote:
Config:
RedHat 7.1
qmail - 1.0.3
daemontools-0.70
dot-forward-0.71
ucspi-tcp-0.88
I'm having a helluva time figuring out how to allow my local hosts to relay
mail through the server. I put the proper line in hosts.allow
Stephen Froehlich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Config:
RedHat 7.1
qmail - 1.0.3
daemontools-0.70
dot-forward-0.71
ucspi-tcp-0.88
I'm having a helluva time figuring out how to allow my local hosts to relay
mail through the server. I put the proper line in hosts.allow (per the
FAQ),
Stephen Froehlich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, I'd like to also gather some opinions on how best to implement POP
and/or IMAP.
Here are my requirements:
In the immediate present, I just need to allow the local network to access.
In the near future, I'll need to allow encrypted remote
Stephen Froehlich wrote:
OK, I'd like to also gather some opinions on how best to implement POP
and/or IMAP.
Here are my requirements:
In the immediate present, I just need to allow the local network to access.
In the near future, I'll need to allow encrypted remote access. (Encrypted
- NEWBIE
Stephen Froehlich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Config:
RedHat 7.1
qmail - 1.0.3
daemontools-0.70
dot-forward-0.71
ucspi-tcp-0.88
I'm having a helluva time figuring out how to allow my local hosts to
relay
mail through the server. I put the proper line in hosts.allow (per
it on a laptop across borders?
- Original Message -
From: Nick (Keith) Fish [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Stephen Froehlich [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Qmail Mailing List
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2001 10:35 AM
Subject: Re: POP/IMAP server - more NEWBIE
Stephen Froehlich wrote:
OK, I'd
Technology Strategic Planning, Inc. wrote:
OK, so both xinetd and tcpserver are running. I get the feeling that I
should pull xinetd out of the startup scripts. How will this effect apache
and other services (most epically bind)?
I assume the two don't coexist well? (A logical
- Original Message -
From: Technology Strategic Planning, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2001 3:24 PM
Subject: Re: Relay IP address ranges - NEWBIE
OK, so both xinetd and tcpserver are running. I get the feeling that I
should pull xinetd out
On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 03:24:05PM -0500, Technology Strategic Planning, Inc. wrote:
OK, so both xinetd and tcpserver are running. I get the feeling that I
should pull xinetd out of the startup scripts. How will this effect apache
and other services (most epically bind)?
I assume the two
Hi guys,
I've installed the mdk (Mandrake) qmail rpm package on my Mandrake 7.2 box.
I've got it set up so that it's dealing with local mail quite nicely, and now
i'm ready to use fetchmail, which is also installed, to download mail from a
pop server.
qmail is running. If i check the ps
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
John Wolford wrote:
qmail is running.
Nope, not quite ...
If i check the ps listing, i see, in part:
[root@homer init.d]# ps -ef |grep qmail
root 29806 29805 1 Jun01 ?02:43:31 supervise qmail-pop3d
root 29808 29805 0 Jun01 ?00:00:00
David Talkington wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
John Wolford wrote:
qmail is running.
Nope, not quite ...
If i check the ps listing, i see, in part:
[root@homer init.d]# ps -ef |grep qmail
root 29806 29805 1 Jun01 ?02:43:31 supervise qmail-pop3d
root
Hello all.
I am niebie to qmail but untill now i am happy.
I have some questions :
I can connect POP3 to the unix users but i cannot receive any email.
When i open the unix-user i made his home directory to be :
/home/username.
Is this the correct one for qmail?If not which is?
Another thing
On Thu, 7 Jun 2001, Constantine Koulis wrote:
I can connect POP3 to the unix users but i cannot receive any email.
When i open the unix-user i made his home directory to be :
/home/username.
Is this the correct one for qmail?If not which is?
Yes it is. I think you should first tell us if
Hi,
I can connect POP3 to the unix users but i cannot receive any email.
When i open the unix-user i made his home directory to be :
/home/username.
Is this the correct one for qmail?If not which is?
this depends on your configuration, in most cases it is
hint: link /var/spool/mail/user +
]
Subject: Re: Newbie question-CJK
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 12:14:23 +0200
Hi,
I can connect POP3 to the unix users but i cannot receive any email.
When i open the unix-user i made his home directory to be :
/home/username.
Is this the correct one for qmail?If not which is?
this depends
On Thu, 7 Jun 2001, Constantine Koulis wrote:
Dear sir.
About local delivery i can send from root to local users but from local
users to root nothing.As well i can send from local users and root to
outside world.
Where is mail for your local users stored?
Do you check ~alias/ for root
Hi,
please mail an exploit of /var/log/qmail/current
and we'll see...
Tom
- Original Message -
From: Ian Truelsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 6:38 AM
Subject: newbie question
I just installed qmail under RedHat 7.1
It passes all the internal
Ian Truelsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It passes all the internal tests, but I am not able to get anything from
outside the local machine.
Okay. Lots of possible causes for that one.
All I get when I try to email my machine at [EMAIL PROTECTED] is
messages from the mail daemon where I
: Re: newbie question
Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 15:16:59 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hi,
please mail an exploit of /var/log/qmail/current
and we'll see...
Tom
- Original Message -
From: Ian Truelsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001
I just installed qmail under RedHat 7.1
It passes all the internal tests, but I am not able to get anything from
outside the local machine. I know I have not set something up properly, or
failed to set something up, but I can't figure out what it is that is wrong.
All I get when I try to
Russell Nelson([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2001.05.12 21:54:32 +:
Chris Garrigues writes:
As it is, I consider unsubscribing several times a week (and it's not because
of the newbies).
I send qmail list traffic into its own mailbox, and read it once a
day. It's kind of handy, because I
I have problem with Users.
I Using qmail with MySQL and trying to send mail. If i send mail then i
don't receive that user doesn't exist but the mail isnt't delivered to his
mailbox. What can be wrong ??
I did everything in LifeWithQMAIL configuration guide and it doesn't work.
If you need some
Am 12.05.2001 um 08:14:41 schrieb Pavel Sorejs:
Hi Pavel,
I Using qmail with MySQL
I did everything in LifeWithQMAIL
afaik LWQ does not talk about MySQL, does it?
As it seems that you do not have long-time experience with qmail it
might make sense to follow LWQ *EXACTLY* to get a plain
Pavel Sorejs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I Using qmail with MySQL and trying to send mail. If i send mail then i
don't receive that user doesn't exist but the mail isnt't delivered to his
mailbox. What can be wrong ??
Look in your logs. qmail logs information about the eventual disposition of
approach. It encourages the
newbie to search the web, list archives, etc. and doesn't reward
newbies by answering their question. It keeps the signal/noise ratio
high, and it keeps the civility and morale high.
Probably. But it demands a certain amount of Teutonic self-control.
--
Chris
Chris Garrigues writes:
As it is, I consider unsubscribing several times a week (and it's not because
of the newbies).
I send qmail list traffic into its own mailbox, and read it once a
day. It's kind of handy, because I can see the questions which don't
get answered, and sometimes I
You are right,
I know very well I did wrong without reading the
information I needed for (I didn´t read the
condition´s information that you need before to
subsrcibe to a list).
As you can realise for my writting, English is not my
primery language (I am Spanish) and for that reason I
I am running qmail on:
RedHat 6.2
256 Mb Ram
I set concurrency remote = 150...
however, most of the time, it seems like only a handful of remote processes
are running, even though the queue backs up (right now, over 14000 msgs in
queue and only 20 remote processes running)...
Michael Geier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am running qmail on:
RedHat 6.2
256 Mb Ram
I set concurrency remote = 150...
however, most of the time, it seems like only a handful of remote processes
are running, even though the queue backs up (right now, over 14000 msgs in
queue and
Michael Geier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I set concurrency remote = 150...
however, most of the time, it seems like only a handful of remote processes
are running, even though the queue backs up (right now, over 14000 msgs in
queue and only 20 remote processes running)...
Most likely you
, 2001 12:30 PM
To: Qmail Mailing List
Subject: Re: newbie question with concurrency remote
Michael Geier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am running qmail on:
RedHat 6.2
256 Mb Ram
I set concurrency remote = 150...
however, most of the time, it seems like only a handful of remote
Robin S. Socha writes:
* Paulo Jan [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010510 11:00]:
Considering the guy's name, perhaps English isn't his primary language
and he isn't fluent at all with it, which would also explain why he
wasn't able to express himself politely enough when rejecting the
offer
FAQ's is the easiest and safest approach. It encourages the
newbie to search the web, list archives, etc. and doesn't reward
newbies by answering their question. It keeps the signal/noise ratio
high, and it keeps the civility and morale high.
Probably. But it demands a certain amount
Hi All,
I´ve been reading Life with Qmail and I am trying to
configurate qmail in my office.
The first problem I found out was about tcpserver.
1. How to configurate it?
2. Where? In which file?
Many thanks for your time,
Pablo
___
Sorry Vinient,
what do you mean?
--- Vinient [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: looking
for small price give me off line list
- Original Message -
From: Pablo Buenaventura [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2001 2:26 PM
Subject: Newbie with tcpserver
PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2001 4:02 PM
Subject: Re: Newbie with tcpserver
Sorry Vinient,
what do you mean?
--- Vinient [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
looking
for small price give me off line list
- Original Message -
From: Pablo Buenaventura [EMAIL PROTECTED
, 2001 4:19 PM
Subject: Re: Newbie with tcpserver
I am running RH7.0
--- Vinient [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
looking
for some commercial, we will setup and give
you for small charge
if you are running on redhat linux
- Original Message -
From: Pablo Buenaventura
it
- Original Message -
From: Pablo Buenaventura [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2001 4:19 PM
Subject: Re: Newbie with tcpserver
I am running RH7.0
--- Vinient [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
looking
for some commercial, we will setup and give
you
* Pablo Buenaventura [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010510 08:08]:
--- Vinient [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
intrested for small price we will do it
No, I am not interested to pay for it.
Let me rephrase that: I am an idiot. I also want free support for an
application which I intend to run in a
* Barry Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010510 08:58]:
First of all: This is the most arrogant list I have come across. All
the other lists that I'm on help out beginners with a short answer (we
were all beginners once ... ), but here the beginner is either told to
RTFM or told to pay for support.
On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 02:42:10PM +0100, Barry Hill wrote:
Hi,
First of all: This is the most arrogant list I have come across. All
the other lists that I'm on help out beginners with a short answer (we
were all beginners once ... ), but here the beginner is either told to
RTFM or told
newbies to ask FAQ's. Telling a
newbie to RTFM is a flame. Telling a newbie which M to F'ing R is
not.
Ignoring FAQ's is the easiest and safest approach. It encourages the
newbie to search the web, list archives, etc. and doesn't reward
newbies by answering their question. It keeps the signal/noise
'text' that says The tcpserver
program?
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Barry Hill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2001 9:42 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Pablo Buenaventura
Subject: Re[2]: Newbie with tcpserver
Hi,
First of all: This is the most arrogant list I have
Thank you very much. 7 more Yahoo! sigs for my collection. You're *such*
a tool, Barry...
Your signatures are just as stupid, and you're an utter tool too. Send an empty
message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and collect the whole set!
But that's not all - if you subscribe in the next 20 minutes, you'll
Robin S. Socha wrote:
* Pablo Buenaventura [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010510 08:08]:
--- Vinient [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
intrested for small price we will do it
No, I am not interested to pay for it.
Let me rephrase that: I am an idiot. I also want free support for an
application which
Can anyone get a burnt pot or just Robin. I have three at home but I am
always looking to improve my collection.
I don't know if it is the time I have spent on this list or what but the
humor is *definitely* starting to improve.
./trav
No one has landed on the moon, its a CIA conspiracy.
At
* Paulo Jan [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010510 11:00]:
Considering the guy's name, perhaps English isn't his primary language
and he isn't fluent at all with it, which would also explain why he
wasn't able to express himself politely enough when rejecting the
offer from that consultant, and had to
Pointing newbies *politely* to the docs answering their question is
OK--it at least helps teach them to help themselves--but it's tedious
work and it also encourages other newbies to ask FAQ's. Telling a
newbie to RTFM is a flame. Telling a newbie which M to F'ing R is
not.
I think pointing
Hey all, I am trying to get qmail to work with MRTG, I am at a complete
loss here
I have qmail runing with daemon tools, at present I have to qmail
servers, with the qmail log being sent to one machine, do I need to run
qmailanalog on each machine.
If anyone can help, it would be great,
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2001 8:53 PM
Subject: Newbie
Hey all, I am trying to get qmail to work with MRTG, I am at a complete
loss here
If anyone can help, it would be great,
https://mail.socha.net/stats/ has
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 12:57:31AM -0500, question question wrote:
I don't see any documentation in the Life with Qmail/Ldap about virtual
domains, although I do see info about virtual users.
You don't need virtual domains on qmail-ldap (although they exist), you just
have users with one ore
question question:
I'm going through all of the qmail/djbdns/etc. archives, but it is slow
going.
I've used sendmail/DNS/BIND on various unix boxes for years and am
absolutely sick of them.
I would like to use qmail and Cyrus IMAP and djbdns, etc. on a single Redhat
7.0 server that
Kieran, Henning, and Joerg,
I want to express my appreciation for your replies to my three posts last
night. It was late and I apologize for not organizing my thoughts into one
single post. I was so tangled up that I needed to just get my questions out
any which way.
I'm still trying to come
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 01:53:50PM -0500, John Hogan wrote:
yep, popper's running...
qmail is configured to ~/Mailbox, tests, performs local delivery and receipt
What popper? qmail-pop3d only does Maildir.
Greetz, Peter.
i was running just regular, old, linux distribution flavored popper... must i switch?
- hogan
At 09:17 PM 4/26/2001 +0200, Peter van Dijk wrote:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 01:53:50PM -0500, John Hogan wrote:
yep, popper's running...
qmail is configured to ~/Mailbox, tests, performs local
thanks for the off-list advice...
i thought i'd let everyone know - building a sym-link from /var/spool/mail/username to
~(username)/Mailbox did the trick... popper must have been looking at the old
/var/spool i'll have to figure out a way to change popper and release those nasty
I'm going through all of the qmail/djbdns/etc. archives, but it is slow
going.
I've used sendmail/DNS/BIND on various unix boxes for years and am
absolutely sick of them.
I would like to use qmail and Cyrus IMAP and djbdns, etc. on a single Redhat
7.0 server that has 8 IP addresses for 8
Actually, I submitted my prior email too quickly.
I have also found the info about Courier IMAP/VMailMgr, and the omail info
as well.
It seems to me that MailDirs still require a login account/home directory
for each webmail user. Please correct me if I am wrong.
Please advise.
I guess qmail-LDAP will eliminate the need to have user accounts/home
directories for the webmail users.
I don't see any documentation in the Life with Qmail/Ldap about virtual
domains, although I do see info about virtual users.
I guess VMailMgr (with Qmail/LDAP) will allow me to set up
1 - 100 of 501 matches
Mail list logo
