Hi,
It doesn't seem to run at all. What's really strange is that when I try
to start smb from the command line, I see:
[root@ripley init.d]# ./smb start
Starting SMB services: [ OK ]
Starting NMB services: [ OK ]
It
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 21-01-02 at 09:03
* ABrady said
On Sun, 20 Jan 2002 16:53:30 -0500
John P Verel [EMAIL PROTECTED] implied:
If one were to move from, say, Red Hat to another distro, what would
be the most similar, and easiest to accomplish?
Try running testparm and see the o/p.i guess it will tell u what the error
is
- Original Message -
From: Hidong Kim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Red Hat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 12:25 PM
Subject: can't start samba
Hi,
I had been running Samba 2.2.1a on a Red Hat 7.2
Hi,
When I run testparm, it doesn't report any errors. But the strange
thing is that it's looking at /etc/local/samba/lib/smb.conf:
[root@ripley bin]# ./testparm
Load smb config files from /usr/local/samba/lib/smb.conf
Processing section [public]
Processing section [public]
Processing section
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hidong Kim wrote:
[root@ripley init.d]# ./smb status
smbd is stopped
nmbd (pid 7759 7758) is running...
Show us the output of the samba error log. /var/log/messages won't
help you much here.
/usr/include/asm/statfs.h:12: redefinition of `struct
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hidong Kim wrote:
[root@ripley bin]# ./testparm
Load smb config files from /usr/local/samba/lib/smb.conf
Processing section [public]
Processing section [public]
Processing section [printers]
Loaded services file OK.
Press enter to see a dump of your
Hi,
I tried to install the source RPM, but it crashed with this error:
checking configure summary
configure: error: summary failure. Aborting config
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.21099 (%build)
RPM build errors:
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.21099 (%build)
I'd
No, but its not that dificult to upgrade by the source code, once you do it that
way you will always do it that way, a quick and dirty would be
rpm -i kernel-source then copy the config you want from /usr/src/linux-
2.4/configs /usr/src/.config
then rpm -e kernel-source
then download a new
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hidong Kim wrote:
struct statfs {
long f_type;
long f_bsize;
long f_blocks;
long f_bfree;
long f_bavail;
long f_files;
long f_ffree;
__kernel_fsid_t f_fsid;
long f_namelen;
Thanks!
I got 2.2.2 compiled and installed. I'm going to try the configuration
after some sleep.
David Talkington wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hidong Kim wrote:
struct statfs {
long f_type;
long f_bsize;
long f_blocks;
Hey guys,
Anyone had any luck with say, the Linux version of audiogalaxy's
satellite program? If so what did you do to get it to recognize you
were runnning it? Thanks.
-Brandon
_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at
On Sun, 20 Jan 2002 22:05:14 -0600
Chad and Doria Skinner [EMAIL PROTECTED] implied:
Use rxvt instead with the -C option. Or xterm with -C (if it does
transparency, which I think it does not). Eterm might have this
option too, maybe.
I downloaded this and it works fine, but I would
Yes. I didn't to begin with, but then turned it on. Still have the
same problem though.
Ben
On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 11:11:21PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you have IP fowarding turn on? if not turn it on. I have a DSL connection
using ppp0 and the rest of my network is a 198.X.X.X.
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002 09:15:23 +0100
Nick Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] implied:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 21-01-02 at 09:03
* ABrady said
On Sun, 20 Jan 2002 16:53:30 -0500
John P Verel [EMAIL PROTECTED] implied:
If one were to move from, say, Red Hat
On 04:56 21 Jan 2002, ABrady [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| On Sun, 20 Jan 2002 22:05:14 -0600
| Chad and Doria Skinner [EMAIL PROTECTED] implied:
| Use rxvt instead with the -C option. Or xterm with -C (if it does
| transparency, which I think it does not). Eterm might have this
| option too,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 21-01-02 at 12:18
* ABrady said
I can't recommend Debian simply because I've tried installing it 10-15
times on 3 different machines with 2 different releases. It failed every
time on a hardware issue. Not something weird, but
Nick Wilson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 21-01-02 at 09:03
* ABrady said
On Sun, 20 Jan 2002 16:53:30 -0500
John P Verel [EMAIL PROTECTED] implied:
If one were to move from, say, Red Hat to another distro, what would
be the most similar, and easiest to
Interesting to note that several contributors to this thread were using
Outlook Express?
I'm one of them. What's your point? Ive got 2 systems sitting in front of
me - one's running Red Hat Linux 7.1 and is my web/DNS/e-mail server, and
one's running Win2K. My primary desktop at home used
http://www.oreillynet.com/cs/weblog/view/wlg/1074
--
Microsoft Windows: Proof that P.T. Barnum was correct.
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Sometimes a few seconds (usually)...although when I did it a few minutes
after discovering the cause, there should have been no difference to
adjust.
I'll have to try ntpdate, I guess.
On Sun, 20 Jan 2002, Devon wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 20 January
Happens when the clock is slow, too.
On Sun, 20 Jan 2002, Statux wrote:
Remember that you can't log off before you log on. Syncronizing the clock
can cause a fast clock to be set back.. effectively messing things up. Try
things like 'lastlog' and 'ac' and see if either of them yell at you.
This expains Sunday's User Friendly comic strip... I thought it was funny,
but I thought it seemed out of left field...
http://ars.userfriendly.org/cartoons/?id=20020120
-Original Message-
From: Bob Staaf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2002 9:09 AM
To: [EMAIL
Yes, but I have forced it into ssh2 only mode, to avoid the ssh1 bug. It
seems that scp2 is needed to do the transfers over ssh2, or something like
that. As soon as I made that change, everythin died.
-Original Message-
From: Gregg Morris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday,
linuxconf has a sendmail module;
if you don't have linuxconf installed, get out your RH cd#2,
mount /dev/cdrom /mnt/cdrom
cd /mnt/cdrom/RedHat/RPMS
ls -l linux*
and when you see it listed
rpm -ivh linuxconf*
Then add the sendmail module to linuxconf -- run linuxconf, got to
linuxconf
OpenNMS appears to have some significant shortcomings for what I need it to
do. That's not to say it isn't good competition for Openview. I need to be
able to import, or install, MIB information to be used when traps are
collected. With OpenNMS you have to manually create an XML doc with all
Yes-- cleared up overnight, after I spent all of Thursday trying to figure
out what was wrong.
Several others on this list had the same symptoms, which also cleared up
overnight. I'm convinced it was due to slow response from DNS servers, when
sendmail was doing a reverse dns lookup.
Whenever
I came across this recently on my Redhat 7.1 box:
[root@bindlestiff mboedick]# rpm -q sudo
sudo-1.6.4-0.7x.2
[root@bindlestiff mboedick]# strings /usr/bin/sudo | tail -1
$OpenBSD: skeleton.c,v 1.18 2001/11/19 19:02:18 mpech Exp $
[root@bindlestiff mboedick]#
I'm kind of curious about it.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all
Is there a way I can find out what the system bell just bleeped for?
Now and again I here it go and just can't fathom out why.
Thanks
- --
Nick Wilson
Tel:+45 3325 0688
Fax:+45 3325 0677
Web:www.explodingnet.com
-BEGIN
I'm still struggling with this. I used the same ntp.conf as my time server,
which successfully has its time synchronized on the net. All I did was
change the ntp.conf to have the client look locally for the time. The
ntp.conf is at the bottom. I'm looking at the docs, but so far I'm not
Matthew,
On Monday 21 January 2002 09:49, you said something about:
I came across this recently on my Redhat 7.1 box:
[root@bindlestiff mboedick]# rpm -q sudo
sudo-1.6.4-0.7x.2
[root@bindlestiff mboedick]# strings /usr/bin/sudo | tail -1
$OpenBSD: skeleton.c,v 1.18 2001/11/19 19:02:18
On Friday 18 January 2002 19:12, David Talkington wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Oeystein Olsen wrote:
I'm running RH7.2 on my laptop from Dell, and I've installed a suspend to
disk partition. I'm having some problems configuring grub to boot from
that partition
Jesus Ortega (a.k.a. Nitebirdz) wrote:
On Sat, 19 Jan 2002, Nick Wilson wrote:
I think I'll be following you,
I can hear Debian calling my name.
- --
Nick Wilson
Come on! Shouldn't we give them the benefit of the doubt? If a merger or
buyout does happen, you can bet
I was aware that entire packages of theirs (like OpenSSH) were widely used
in other systems, but I hadn't realized that patches of theirs to things
like telnet and sudo made it into Linux distributions. I am thankful
though that their security auditing efforts and solid code are benefitting
I would think that if the article was entirely off base, RH would have
denied it rather than saying we don't comment on rumors.
JW wrote:
Say... has anyone from _redhat_ said anything about this? Or is this just a big
rumor that W-post is putting out for the humor of it?
For that matter
I just inherited a Compaq 1267 laptop that has these little keys on it for
bringing up a browser, mail program and the like. I would like to set them
up for use in linux, to bring up a terminal, galeon, that sort of thing. How
would I go about doing something like that? Are there tools that
John P Verel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If one were to move from, say, Red Hat to another distro, what would be
the most similar, and easiest to accomplish?
That's a very inapproriate question on this list.
--
Trond Eivind Glomsrød
Red Hat, Inc.
* On 21-01-02 at 17:29
* Trond Eivind Glomsrød said
If one were to move from, say, Red Hat to another distro, what would be
the most similar, and easiest to accomplish?
That's a very inapproriate question on this list.
Why?
In light of other threads expressing the fears of many RH
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Janyne Kizer wrote:
This is the problem. Red Hat is committed to open source. AOL-Time
Warner is committed to proprietary development. Think AIM and AOL
Keyword and all of the problems that occur on mailing lists (listserv
and majordomo both) every time a new version
--- Trond Eivind Glomsrød [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John P Verel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If one were to move from, say, Red Hat to another
distro, what would be
the most similar, and easiest to accomplish?
That's a very inapproriate question on this list.
--
Trond Eivind
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 21-01-02 at 17:34
* rpjday said
An even greater challenge to Microsoft would be for AOL Time Warner
to develop a rival operating system that works exclusively with the
media giant's own Internet service provider, its Web browser or
There's a link to the story on the Reuters home page, under Technology, so
I would say it's legit. http://www.reuters.com
Chris
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002 11:04:41 -0500
Janyne Kizer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would think that if the article was entirely off base, RH would have
denied it rather
Title: RE: Changing from Red Hat to another distro: recommendations?
Gosh I think idle threats like this are inappropriate as they waste value bandwidth.
(and I am *NOT* a redhat employee)
As for the original question, Mandrake was spun off of Redhat and is thus very similar.
There are
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 21-01-02 at 17:39
* nit etc said
I see that you are an employee of Redhat. I'd be
careful of such comments if I were you; you wouldn't
want something on Slashdot or Linuxtoday with the
topic of Redhat censors their mailing lists or
To redhat: I was unaware this list has a terms of usage policy disallowing such
discussion. This comment doesn't serve a purpose.
To John Verel: I recommend either Mandrake or SUSE. Both have been VERY good
distro's in the past and have been happy with them. I've pretty much standardized
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 10:51:17AM -0500, Janyne Kizer wrote:
This is the problem. Red Hat is committed to open source. AOL-Time
Warner is committed to proprietary development. Think AIM and AOL
Keyword and all of the problems that occur on mailing lists (listserv
and majordomo both)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Chris Montgomery posted the following:
CMThere's a link to the story on the Reuters home page, under Technology, so
CMI would say it's legit. http://www.reuters.com
it's also found its way on to cnn.com!
Hello again:
Hello:
As I only know enough to be dangerous, I hope that someone can help. I am
trying to get Outlook 2000 configured as an IMAP client and Red Hat Linux
7.2 configured as a IMAP server.
I installed the imap-2000c-15.i386.rpm package and have created an IMAP
account in
If one were to move from, say, Red Hat to another
distro, what would be
the most similar, and easiest to accomplish?
Bandwidth spartanly:
Be a Man! (Or *really* butch...)
GET SLACK!!!
HTTP://WWW.SlackWare.Com
HTTP://WWW.SubGenius.Com
Woop. ;))
All the best,
[EMAIL
Frank Carreiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] implied:
To redhat: I was unaware this list has a terms of usage policy
disallowing such discussion. This comment doesn't serve a purpose.
To John Verel: I recommend either Mandrake or SUSE. Both have been
VERY good distro's in the past and have been
First, try kep in a non volatile file all data about it
Try to see all files relatives to log any action done by the kernel. This is
in /etc/syslog.conf, at his point, you must find out any entry like :
kern.* /dev/console
and insert down a line as :
kern.*/my_log_file
i recently receive this error while install from rpm
error: db3 error(-30998) from db-close: DB_INCOMPLETE: Cache flush was unable to
complete
rpmdb: Unreferenced page 5783
error: db3 error(-30985) from db-verify: DB_VERIFY_BAD: Database verification failed
this problem occured when i press
Hi all,
My first time on the list. I have been looking at the archives but am not
able to find anything on this.
I have 3 web servers, 1 development/nfs server and 2 database mysql servers
in a cluster server farm. All sites are owned by our company so nobody will
be on the system except for
Hi Ben
Do you have the routing table for 192.168.1.41? The second thing both
mach1 and mach2 have the same ip address 192.168.1.40. My guess is mach2
is supposed to have 192.168.1.41.
You will need IP forwarding on all the boxes except mach4 as well.
david
On Sun, 20 Jan 2002, Ben Logan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 19-01-02 at 17:51
* Ben Logan said
This isn't a list, but I think it's a pretty good resource. I didn't
know about it until recently:
The Unix Guru Universe
http://www.ugu.com
Yes, that does look worthwhile.
Still looking for a
Try rpm --rebuilddb
On Tue, 22 Jan 2002, Lewi wrote:
i recently receive this error while install from rpm
error: db3 error(-30998) from db-close: DB_INCOMPLETE: Cache flush was unable to
complete
rpmdb: Unreferenced page 5783
error: db3 error(-30985) from db-verify: DB_VERIFY_BAD:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Nick Wilson wrote:
I see that you are an employee of Redhat. I'd be
careful of such comments if I were you; you wouldn't
want something on Slashdot or Linuxtoday with the
topic of Redhat censors their mailing lists or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 21-01-02 at 19:15
* Anthony E. Greene said
I see that you are an employee of Redhat. I'd be
careful of such comments if I were you; you wouldn't
want something on Slashdot or Linuxtoday with the
topic of Redhat censors their
- Original Message -
From: Anthony E. Greene [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 12:06 PM
Subject: [OT] speech issues on this list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Nick Wilson wrote:
I see that you are an
Does it happen when pine is open? Pine will bleep everytime a new message
arrives in the currently opened mailbox.
-adam
Hi all
Is there a way I can find out what the system bell just bleeped for?
Now and again I here it go and just can't fathom out why.
Thanks
- --
Nick Wilson
I have been seeing the term 'slashdotted' come up a few times, both here and
in other lists. I am not sure if I am just dense, or if I am too new to this
to know the lore, but what does the term refer to?
Thanks for filling the knowledge gap.
Ian.
Ian Truelsen
Masters program in
Title: RE: slashdotted?
www.slashdot.org
(linux friendly/geek news board)
-Original Message-
From: Ian Truelsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 11:40 AM
To: RedHat List
Subject: slashdotted?
I have been seeing the term 'slashdotted' come up a few
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 21-01-02 at 19:50
* Adam Goucher said
Does it happen when pine is open? Pine will bleep everytime a new message
arrives in the currently opened mailbox.
No, good point though, I usually have Mutt runing on one console but I
don't
This link gives a pretty good explanation:
http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/jargon/html/entry/slashdot-effect.html
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 06:40:23PM +, Ian Truelsen wrote:
I have been seeing the term 'slashdotted' come up a few times, both here and
in other lists. I am not sure if I am just
At 06:40 PM 1/21/2002 +, you wrote:
I have been seeing the term 'slashdotted' come up a few times, both here and in other
lists. I am not sure if I am just dense, or if I am too new to this to know the lore,
but what does the term refer to?
Presumably you know about the geek-news site
Ian,
On Monday 21 January 2002 01:40, you said something about:
I have been seeing the term 'slashdotted' come up a few times, both here
and in other lists. I am not sure if I am just dense, or if I am too new to
this to know the lore, but what does the term refer to?
Thanks for filling the
JW writes:
Hope that makes sense :-)
Sure does. Thanks.
Ian.
Ian Truelsen
Masters program in Philosophy
University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
BA (Wilfrid Laurier University)
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current favourite quote:
No great civilisation likes forests.
K.F. O'Connor
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Janyne Kizer wrote:
This is the problem. Red Hat is committed to open source. AOL-Time
Warner is committed to proprietary development. Think AIM and AOL
Keyword and all of the problems that occur on mailing lists (listserv
and majordomo both) every time a new version
On Sat, 19 Jan 2002, Dave Ihnat wrote:
Third, Red Hat still has excellent developers and employees who have been
working their asses off for several years to turn out great products, great
service and great support.
And the developers and employees must do what they're told when the
nit etc [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
--- Trond Eivind Glomsrød [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John P Verel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If one were to move from, say, Red Hat to another
distro, what would be
the most similar, and easiest to accomplish?
That's a very inapproriate question
Just in keeping with, BBSpot already has a satirical article on this:
http://www.bbspot.com/News/2002/01/Top_11_redhat.html
-Original Message-
From: Jesus Ortega (a.k.a. Nitebirdz) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 02:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 21-01-02 at 20:15
* Jesus Ortega (a.k.a. Nitebirdz) said
That shouldn't be an issue if Red Hat is kept as a subsidiary of AOL or at
least as a semi-autonomous company like Netscape. In any case, I'm not saying
I'm really excited by
-Original Message-
From: rpjday [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 02:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: AOL in Negotiations to Buy Red Hat
this may be a naive question but, what exactly would AOL
get from *buying* red hat, as opposed to simply
* On 21-01-02 at 20:22
* Trond Eivind Glomsrød said
I see that you are an employee of Redhat. I'd be
careful of such comments if I were you; you wouldn't
want something on Slashdot or Linuxtoday with the
topic of Redhat censors their mailing lists
We don't. But switching away
Simple. If they wanted to use Linux as the base for something in the
future, they would want to make sure that the developers were stable
financially. RedHat is profitable, but barely so. If there were some
major issue the financial health of RH would be at risk, and so would
whatever AOL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ian Truelsen wrote:
I just inherited a Compaq 1267 laptop that has these little keys on it for
bringing up a browser, mail program and the like. I would like to set them
up for use in linux, to bring up a terminal, galeon, that sort of thing. How
Well, if they are not running away, AOL would benefit from the 600
employees (minus Alan Cox) who are most experienced with RH.
At 02:20 PM 1/21/2002 -0500, you wrote:
this may be a naive question but, what exactly would AOL
get from *buying* red hat, as opposed to simply *using* red hat.
Hi,
I still can't start Samba. I just compiled Samba 2.2.2 to upgrade from
2.2.1a. I'm going through the DIAGNOSIS.txt file. So far, I can run
testparm without errors, ping the Linux Samba server from Windows
machines and vice versa. But then I'm stuck at smbclient. 'smbclient
-L localhost'
Title: RE: slashdotted?
I think I am one of the few comp geeks that doesn't
read slashdot on a regular basis. I actually prefer other outlets such as
tomshardware and theregister to slashdot. Maybe it is because I use linux
for servers only and not a desktop... Maybe its because I have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[root@ripley samba]# smbclient -L localhost
added interface ip=192.168.230.201 bcast=192.168.230.255
nmask=255.255.255.0
added interface ip=172.16.166.1 bcast=172.16.166.255 nmask=255.255.255.0
added interface ip=172.16.177.1 bcast=172.16.177.255
Hi,
How do I check if something's running on port 139 of my machine? I want
to see if something's already running on port 139 which is preventing me
from starting Samba. Thanks,
Hidong
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Try 'netsat', I think the -p option lets you see the
process that is using the port.
For quick check, you can just telnet 127.0.0.1 139
to see if some process is listening on that port.
--- Hidong Kim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
How do I check if something's running on port 139 of
my
Not only the site, but the fact that once a company/site is mentioned in a
www.slashdot.org article, the company's site tends to get overrun with web
requests, causing the site to be virtually unreachable.
That is that being slashdotted is all about. G
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Brad Bonkoski
Of course, if the process on that port is running udp instead of tcp,
telnet won't do anything.
The best bet is to get a port scanner, like nmap, and run that against the
machine in question.
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, nit etc wrote:
Try 'netsat', I think the -p option lets you see the
process
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Brenden Walker wrote:
Who gnows, but perhaps we're missing an angle here. Maybe RedHat is simply
'negotiating' for free press?
... or maybe (and I'd like this idea way better than the one where AOL outright
purchases Red Hat), they are simply negotiating a
Title: RE: checking ports
I think they mean:
netstat
run 'netstat -pna | less'
That will give you IP:Port combinations (for BOTH tcp and udp) as well as the program name
man netstat will give you the full array of options.
-Original Message-
From: nit etc [mailto:[EMAIL
To John Verel: I recommend either Mandrake or SUSE. Both have been VERY
good distro's in the past and have been happy with them. I've pretty much
standardized on RedHat personally.
I would agree. I switched from RH to SuSE after RH 5.1, and then went to
MDK in November. Just keep in
netstat -ln
will show you all ports, numerically, that are listening.
- Original Message -
From: Hidong Kim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Red Hat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 3:10 PM
Subject: checking ports
Hi,
How do I check if something's running on port 139 of my
On Mon, 2002-01-21 at 13:16, Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote:
We don't. But switching away from RHL is, IMNSHO, better discussed on
non-RH lists.
--
I for one appreciate the loyalty to your employer that you show by your
comments Trond. It does not seem the norm nowadays. It is exactly the
Try removing the multicastclient line in your ntp.conf file for your time
server.
Gerry
--
The lyfe so short, the craft so long to learne Chaucer
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello Everyone,
Is there a mailing list for errata ? How do I subscribe to it ?
Thanks,
Pieter De Wit
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Did you just change your kernel?
Do an 'ifconfig'. Check if 'lo' interface is up.
I have a hunch that maybe your kernel doesn't support local loopback
connection.
At 11:36 AM 1/21/2002 -0800, you wrote:
Hi,
I still can't start Samba. I just compiled Samba 2.2.2 to upgrade from
2.2.1a. I'm
i've heard nothing but good things about slackware
since going that route apparently gives you total control
i can't speak from experience there though
i CAN however speak of SuSE
in a phrase: don't like it
everything in the os is special
programs and config files are kept in odd places
and
Hello!
After I subscribed (1 time) to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I receive every
posting two times.
I unsubscribed and subcribed once again, but it causes the same error.
That's so...!!! I'm not sooo stupid, I think.
I'm a member of some other mailinglist and I've never had such a problem.
It would
Hello!
After I subscribed (1 time) to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I receive every
posting two times.
I unsubscribed and subcribed once again, but it causes the same error.
That's so...!!! I'm not sooo stupid, I think.
I'm a member of some other mailinglist and I've never had such a problem.
It would
On 21 Jan 2002 14:42:52 -0600
Bret Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] scribbled in frustration:
On Mon, 2002-01-21 at 13:16, Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote:
We don't. But switching away from RHL is, IMNSHO, better discussed on
non-RH lists.
--
I for one appreciate the loyalty to your employer
If not SUSE then Slackware isn't bad. I've messed with it awhile back
and my experience was positive.
Also FreeBSD isn't bad. I'm currently working with a FreeBSD system
(version 4.4) and so far it's been stable and runs what I want just fine.
The ONLY thing I HATED about FreeBSD was the
taken from the headers of all of these emails:
List-Id: General Red Hat Linux discussion list redhat-list.redhat.com
List-Post: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
List-Subscribe: https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list,
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=subscribe
List-Unsubscribe:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 21-01-02 at 22:11
* Stefan Rieger said
Hello!
Hi there!
After I subscribed (1 time) to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I receive every
posting two times.
I unsubscribed and subcribed once again, but it causes the same error.
That's
Eric...he wasn't asking how to subscribe or unsubscribe...he's already
done that proces...
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, eric clover wrote:
taken from the headers of all of these emails:
List-Id: General Red Hat Linux discussion list redhat-list.redhat.com
List-Post: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
i retract that.
sorry.
i just got back from lunch and im all fat, dumb and happy :)
eric
- Original Message -
From: eric clover [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 3:10 PM
Subject: [RHL] Re: The worst question ever
taken from the headers of all of
1 - 100 of 176 matches
Mail list logo
