Re: a little help with RH 7.3

2003-07-22 Thread MWafkowski
I don't know about your second question but regarding the first: It sounds like this is the same setup (exactly) that you were using under Win and getting 4-5K? If so, are you plugging into the same phone jack as before? Are you using a longer RJ-11 cable? Have you tried setting your port speed a

Re: Software-RAID Issues on RH7.2

2003-07-22 Thread Ricky Boone
On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 10:07, Ricky Boone wrote: > Haven't seen a response from anyone concerning this issue, so ... *bump* :) :( Seems like I'm talking to myself... > Dunno... it really looks like the RAM-disk is the answer... BTW: I've tried the following: # mkinitrd --preload raid1 --wit

Re: Re: How do you correctly set .htaccess, htpasswd, and httpd.conf?

2003-07-22 Thread Joshua Peter
I found a bit of a problem that is no biggie, but I would like to have it cleared up anyway. On my Linux box, I can see in PHPMyAdmin browser window an image that's a link to the PHPMyAdmin website. However, when I browse to my website from a Windows 2000 box, I'm not seeing that same icon. Instea

Re: How do you correctly set .htaccess, htpasswd, and httpd.conf?

2003-07-22 Thread Joshua Peter
I was able to fix my own problem from the overflowing amount of information on the web. I was trying to go this route before, but I found a bit of info on a message board that solved my problem. I moved the located on the htpasswd file, and modified my httpd.conf and htaccess files accordingly. The

a little help with RH 7.3

2003-07-22 Thread Strider Alex Hunter
Hello! I've just subscribed to this list and i hope that someone can help me I have a computer where i have a Redhat 7.3 box with the following hardware descriptions: - Pentium MMX 233Mhz, 64 MB RAM 100Mhz., two 2.1 GB HDDs, 10 Mbps Lan card and an external US Robotics 56K analog modem. My e

no space on /boot

2003-07-22 Thread Michael Rubin
I naively didn't leave enough space on my / partition and now /boot doesn't have enough space for me to upgrade to the latest kernel. Only the current kernel is there now and I'm still short a few megs. This is a live server so I can't really mess with it too much. What can I do? -- redhat-li

Re: Resetting IFCONFIG Info

2003-07-22 Thread Edward Dekkers
Joe Giles wrote: Hello All, Is there a way to zero out the information you get when you preform an ifconfig without rebooting the machine? I need to clear out the collisions and other errors to see if trouble shooting I'm doing is working. Thanks a million Joe Not sure this is what you want bu

Re: Resetting IFCONFIG Info

2003-07-22 Thread Joe Giles
H.. Well, if I can isolate the kernel module for ONE card, that would be great, but I don't think it works that way. Oh well, I guess I'll have to cause a stir. Especially if they want a smooth running server :-D Thanks for all the replies. I actually learned a few things I never new. Thanks

Re: Resetting IFCONFIG Info

2003-07-22 Thread Joe Giles
H.. Well, if I can isolate the kernel module for ONE card, that would be great, but I don't think it works that way. Oh well, I guess I'll have to cause a stir. Especially if they want a smooth running server :-D Thanks for all the replies. I actually learned a few things I never new. Thanks

Re: Resetting IFCONFIG Info

2003-07-22 Thread Peter Kiem
> Well, I have tried using ifdown eth1 && ifup eht1 , and that stops and > restart the ETH1 card, but the counters all stay the same. I have even > tried ifconfig down && ifconfig up on the same card and same results. I > looked at the man ifconfig and man mii-tool but nothing on resetting the > co

Unresponsive machine during disk activity - RedHat 9

2003-07-22 Thread Mike Blatchley
Since switching from RedHat 8 to RedHat 9, my machine becomes very sluggish if one process is doing a lot of disk access. Has anything changed such that IDE disk access takes higher priority now? I expect an application relying on disk access to perform worse, but this sucks the life out of other

Re: Resetting IFCONFIG Info

2003-07-22 Thread Joe Giles
Well, I have tried using ifdown eth1 && ifup eht1 , and that stops and restart the ETH1 card, but the counters all stay the same. I have even tried ifconfig down && ifconfig up on the same card and same results. I looked at the man ifconfig and man mii-tool but nothing on resetting the counters. Su

Re: Resetting IFCONFIG Info

2003-07-22 Thread Rodolfo J. Paiz
At 7/22/2003 23:10 -0600, you wrote: Is there a way to zero out the information you get when you preform an ifconfig without rebooting the machine? I need to clear out the collisions and other errors to see if trouble shooting I'm doing is working. Will "service network restart" do it? Have you r

Re: monitor patch for orinoco_cs v0.13d?

2003-07-22 Thread George Nicholls
try the wlan-ng project; they have binaries there, maybe they will solve it. Have never tried to run with an orinoco chip:-) G On Wed, 2003-07-23 at 03:04, Benjamin J. Weiss wrote: > All, > > Okay, after much messing around, I figured out that my Dell Lattitude > C840 comes with a built-in True

Resetting IFCONFIG Info

2003-07-22 Thread Joe Giles
Hello All, Is there a way to zero out the information you get when you preform an ifconfig without rebooting the machine? I need to clear out the collisions and other errors to see if trouble shooting I'm doing is working. Thanks a million Joe -- Joe Giles [EMAIL PROTECTED] AOL: mcigiles --

a little help with RH 7.3

2003-07-22 Thread Strider Alex Hunter
Title: Mensaje Hello! I've just subscribed to this list and i hope that someone can help me   I have a computer where i have a Redhat 7.3 box with the following hardware descriptions:   - Pentium MMX 233Mhz, 64 MB RAM 100Mhz., two 2.1 GB HDDs, 10 Mbps Lan card and an external US Roboti

How do you correctly set .htaccess, htpasswd, and httpd.conf?

2003-07-22 Thread Joshua Peter
I'm trying to secure my directory that has phpmyadmin. I've placed a .htaccess file in there that has: # .htaccess contents AuthType Basic AuthUserFile /var/www/passwd/phpmyadmin.pwd AuthName My Realm Require valid-user htpasswd is in a seperate dir as indicated in my .htaccess: # htpasswd cont

Re: No Wine on RH9 ?

2003-07-22 Thread Edward Dekkers
Just a quick note - I did a clean install of 9 (yes, it's 9, not 9.0!!!), full install, but no wine, so I'm inclined to think it got on your system some other way too. Regards, Ed. -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-l

monitor patch for orinoco_cs v0.13d?

2003-07-22 Thread Benjamin J. Weiss
All, Okay, after much messing around, I figured out that my Dell Lattitude C840 comes with a built-in TrueMobile 1150. It seems to load with the orinoco_cs drivers okay, except that iwpriv doesn't show "monitor" anywhere, which means that I can't use airsnort, kismet, etc. >From googling around,

Re: Adding files to log (cat?)

2003-07-22 Thread System Administrator
I am assumong that you use something on the order of dumpcommandline > /var/log/backup If so - change to dumpcommandline >> /var/log/backup the >> appends rather than writing to the file. On Tuesday 22 July 2003 18:17, AragonX wrote: > I'm running a nightly backup using dump. I'm outputting t

RE: bad RPMS

2003-07-22 Thread Stuart Clark
rpm -qi This should give you info about the installed package Eg rpm -qi samba rpm -qip This should give you info about an uninstalled package EG: rpm -qip samba-2.2.7a-7.9.0.i386.rpm Regards Stuart Clark -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On

Re: [OT] Does this mean that IP was proven on the SCO case?

2003-07-22 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
Hi Rick, > Ignoring for > the moment that they may own nothing as far as any code is concerned > (Novell's claim) What Novell actually thinks of this is not clear to me any more. I was under the impression that Novell did change it's stand on this issue somewhat. But this will probably remain

Re: [OT] Does this mean that IP was proven on the SCO case?

2003-07-22 Thread Ed Wilts
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 01:29:21AM +0200, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: > Hi Lorenzo, > > > But the problem is that this supposed IP is part of the kernel, (which > > is licensed under the GPL) and that SCO has distributed this kernel > > (under the GPL) for years, knowing that this IP was there >

RE: [OT] Does this mean that IP was proven on the SCO case?

2003-07-22 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
Hi Michael, > > A little like SuSE making people pay for their installer > > (YaST). > Is it really? I am not so sure, was YAST ever licensed under the GPL? > Even so, the GPL doesn't prevent someone from charging for it, it just > means the Source has to be privided when asked. I think you mi

Re: bad RPMS

2003-07-22 Thread Ed Wilts
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 05:03:42PM -0700, Jon Neher wrote: > > My RH8.0 system got updated with some RH AS2.1 rpms (don't ask). > We don't know when it happened or what the list is. Does > anyone know a way to verify the rpms on a system? There's a couple of things to do. First, get a list of a

Re: backup mac server from linux?

2003-07-22 Thread Nicholas Marsh
Are we talking about Mac OS X? If so it has a BSD core and includes NFS. Thus, I would mount the Mac's HD from my Linux server and use tar to get all it's data. Alternatively, you can export a directory on your Linux server and tar from the Mac to the Linux box. However, the BSD tar isn't as go

bad RPMS

2003-07-22 Thread Jon Neher
My RH8.0 system got updated with some RH AS2.1 rpms (don't ask). We don't know when it happened or what the list is. Does anyone know a way to verify the rpms on a system? Thanks, Jon Computing CenterInternet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] University of OregonWW

Re: [OT] Does this mean that IP was proven on the SCO case?

2003-07-22 Thread Michael Mansour
I know there's alot of links out there, but you may all be interested in this one too: http://radio.weblogs.com/0120124/stories/2003/06/24/scoArchives.html Michael. > > No, I did not. My concern was the fact that in the > company quotes to the > > media - there's NO mention of IBM Linux custome

Re: [OT] Does this mean that IP was proven on the SCO case?

2003-07-22 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
Hi Lorenzo, > But the problem is that this supposed IP is part of the kernel, (which > is licensed under the GPL) and that SCO has distributed this kernel > (under the GPL) for years, knowing that this IP was there In a court case you would have to substantiate the fact that they knew the code

Re: [OT] Does this mean that IP was proven on the SCO case?

2003-07-22 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
Hi Jon, > However, the fact that they had a developer working on the supposed > sections of code for many years seems to imply that they did have that > knowledge. That would/will probably make it a little more difficult in court to prove their ignorance of the fact that their IP was abused in

Re: Solaris<->RH8 Backup

2003-07-22 Thread System Administrator
Well I tried that and ti didn't work either BUT... all of this did give me enough understanding to derive the correct combination. ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED] tar -cf - $REMOTEDIRECTORY |cat >$LOCALDIRECTORY/$REMOTEHOSTNAME/$TARFILENAME Thanks for the help On Tuesday 22 July 2003 15:27, Samuel F

Adding files to log (cat?)

2003-07-22 Thread AragonX
I'm running a nightly backup using dump. I'm outputting the information to a log file /var/log/backup. I would like to add to the file each time I run a backup. How do I do that? Do I use cat? -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/lis

Re: No Wine on RH9.0 ?

2003-07-22 Thread Joseph A Nagy Jr
On Tuesday 22 July 2003 15:41, Kent Borg wrote this in an attempt to be witty and informative: > Well, something doesn't add up. I remember people complaining that > wine was dropped, I didn't get wine installed in my "everything" > install, Samuel Flory came to the conclusion wine is not in 9,

cache size

2003-07-22 Thread yangtj207
Hi Guys, I just re-install the RH9 and I happened to find that my celeron2.0's cache size become 8kb (cat /proc/cpuinfo). Usually it should be 128kb. I check the mainboard information and it's 128kb. Anyone has any ideas what happened to my system? Thank you. Tingjun ___

Re: A question.

2003-07-22 Thread Gordon Messmer
reza saeidinia wrote: Is stdsyms.h a system file of linux? if it is true please send this file for me. I want to run a program and the error "no rule to make /usr/includs/sys/stdsyms.h" is accured . please help me. http://lists.parisc-linux.org/hypermail/parisc-linux/10707.html -- redhat-list mai

Re: [OT] Does this mean that IP was proven on the SCO case?

2003-07-22 Thread Cliff Wells
On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 13:42, rm wrote: > Actually their claim is specifically the kernel; and more specifically > the multiprocessor capabilities that appeared rather suddenly in 2.4. Suddenly? 1.3 saw the beginnings of SMP support. 2.0 definitely had SMP (although not very scalable). Improved

Re: How many ip address question

2003-07-22 Thread MKlinke
On Tuesday 22 July 2003 12:30, Mark Neidorff wrote: > What an enviable position to be in I'm about to switch ISPs and > one of my choices is how many static IPs I want. So, of course, it > depends on my network. OK, my network physically 1 linux box to > which 7 other computers attach. I wan

Re: [OT] Does this mean that IP was proven on the SCO case?

2003-07-22 Thread Zoran's mailinglist account
Le 22/07/2003 14:08, « Leonard den Ottolander » <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > Hi Edward, > >> Surely some clever programmers can just re-write the offending code so >> as not to breach IP? > > There are no explicit IP claims in the lawsuit. If there were, indeed > the offending code could be t

Re: [OT] Does this mean that IP was proven on the SCO case?

2003-07-22 Thread Rick Warner
On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 13:42, rm wrote: > none of us really knows if there is any truth to their claim. Yes, and unless they disclose what their claim really is, then no one will really know. Signing a 'brutal NDA' to hear their claim is not disclosure. > David Boise is a damn good lawyer, Was

Re: How many ip address question

2003-07-22 Thread Ezra Nugroho
Well, you need 1 then. But if it's cheap, I would buy some more. Quoting Mark Neidorff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > What an enviable position to be in I'm about to switch ISPs and one of > my choices is how many static IPs I want. So, of course, it depends on my > network. OK, my network phys

Cisco Router

2003-07-22 Thread Mark Neidorff
I'm in the process of switching ISPs. One that I'm considering offers a Cisco 687 DSL router. When I went to the Cisco site, I saw that this router is unsupported and past "end of life." Is this a bad choice based on being past end of life or is this router a solid product that should give me

How many ip address question

2003-07-22 Thread Mark Neidorff
What an enviable position to be in I'm about to switch ISPs and one of my choices is how many static IPs I want. So, of course, it depends on my network. OK, my network physically 1 linux box to which 7 other computers attach. I want the linux box to be the firewall and mail server for th

Re: standalone firewall connections

2003-07-22 Thread Rodolfo J. Paiz
At 7/22/2003 12:26 -0700, you wrote: The new standalone firewall box I have built is now connecting via PPP with wvdial, a great little tool. The firewall, be it shorewall or if I just decide to use ipchains with lokkit, is off. The "firewall" and the "standalone firewall box" are the same, right

Re: ftp return parameter

2003-07-22 Thread Ed Wilts
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 01:21:46PM -0700, Sambit Nanda wrote: > this is beautiful, thanks for the hint, now the next > question is how I will come to know before doing > ncftpget whether the file present in remote host > directory or not > > I thought to use nfftpls –l -f sam.cfg > /home/$USE

Re: Opteron Processor

2003-07-22 Thread Samuel Flory
Christian Fredrickson wrote: I would like to create a database server using dual Opteron processors. I read that Redhat planned to support the Opteron, but I cannot find any information on what versions of Redhat will support the Opteron. Does anyone have any information or suggestions? Ther

RE: network logon?

2003-07-22 Thread Chris W. Parker
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tuesday, July 22, 2003 1:45 PM said: > I've done that, but that doesn't provide a 'network login' in the way > other windoze machines login. When I try to access a shared directory > on a W2K box it asks for name and password and then says I don'

RE: network logon?

2003-07-22 Thread chip . wiegand
I've done that, but that doesn't provide a 'network login' in the way other windoze machines login. When I try to access a shared directory on a W2K box it asks for name and password and then says I don't have permission, but I do, full control, I'm one of the network admins. There must be a wa

RE: network logon?

2003-07-22 Thread Michael Gargiullo
Ah good catch. On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 16:32, Stuart Clark wrote: > It should be like this > > smbmount //192.168.0.X/test /data/dir -o > rw,username=tridge,password=foobar > > Of course the directory /data/dir, or simular mount point, should be > created first > > Test the NT server with > sm

Re: No Wine on RH9.0 ?

2003-07-22 Thread Kent Borg
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 03:24:44PM -0500, Joseph A Nagy Jr wrote: > On Tuesday 22 July 2003 15:15, Kent Borg wrote this in an attempt to be > witty and informative: > > On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 11:30:10AM -0500, Joseph A Nagy Jr wrote: > > > It was installed by default for me and I didn't do an eve

Re: Creating a Recover CD with mkcdrec

2003-07-22 Thread Lorenzo Prince
Luciano Rabelo staggered into view and mumbled: >The CD is readable but it is not bootable in that server. > The CD is bootable in another machine. It would seem as if the bios in the server has been reset to disable booting from the CD-ROM. Try enabling the CD-ROM in the boot order for the m

Re: [OT] Does this mean that IP was proven on the SCO case?

2003-07-22 Thread rm
On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 12:01, Rick Warner wrote: > On Mon, 2003-07-21 at 19:07, Edward Dekkers wrote: > > > > ... But, SCO has waved their > wand and made nebulous allegations that some of their IP, without > specifying what it is, has leaked into Linux, including the kernel. Actually their clai

RE: network logon?

2003-07-22 Thread Stuart Clark
It should be like this smbmount //192.168.0.X/test /data/dir -o rw,username=tridge,password=foobar Of course the directory /data/dir, or simular mount point, should be created first Test the NT server with smbclient -L NTserver -U validuser You could also edit your /etc/fstab file to make it

Re: No Wine on RH9.0 ?

2003-07-22 Thread Joseph A Nagy Jr
On Tuesday 22 July 2003 15:15, Kent Borg wrote this in an attempt to be witty and informative: > On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 11:30:10AM -0500, Joseph A Nagy Jr wrote: > > It was installed by default for me and I didn't do an everything > > install. > > Were you doing an upgrade from, say, RH 7.3? May

Re: ftp return parameter

2003-07-22 Thread Sambit Nanda
this is beautiful, thanks for the hint, now the next question is how I will come to know before doing ncftpget whether the file present in remote host directory or not I thought to use nfftpls –l -f sam.cfg /home/$USER/sam.out, and the result came out NOT a URL: /home//sam.out is there any

Creating a Recover CD with mkcdrec

2003-07-22 Thread Luciano Rabelo
Hi, I created a recover CD with mkcdrec for a server machine but it didn't boot. The CD is readable but it is not bootable in that server. The CD is bootable in another machine. Does anyone know where the problem is? Thanks! [] Luciano -- ***

Re: No Wine on RH9.0 ?

2003-07-22 Thread Kent Borg
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 11:30:10AM -0500, Joseph A Nagy Jr wrote: > It was installed by default for me and I didn't do an everything > install. Were you doing an upgrade from, say, RH 7.3? Maybe your installation of wine is left over from then. -kb -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mai

Re: No Wine on RH9.0 ?

2003-07-22 Thread Joseph A Nagy Jr
On Tuesday 22 July 2003 15:02, Samuel Flory wrote this in an attempt to be witty and informative: > Joseph A Nagy Jr wrote: > >It was installed by default for me and I didn't do an everything > >install. > > Wine is not in RH 9. Read the release notes folks. I believe that > it was taken out

Re: No Wine on RH9.0 ?

2003-07-22 Thread Samuel Flory
Joseph A Nagy Jr wrote: On Tuesday 22 July 2003 08:59, Kent Borg wrote this in an attempt to be witty and informative: On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 12:25:33AM -0500, Joseph A Nagy Jr wrote: Wine is in 9.0. Are you sure? I don't see it in my "everything" install. -kb It was instal

RE: network logon?

2003-07-22 Thread Kunkel, Mark
Title: RE: network logon? If what you are trying to do is to use your Windows logon as your logon for your linux computer, go to system settings->Authentication on the RedHat menu. Choose the Authentication tab, Check Enable SMB support. Then press the Configure SMB button and enter the workgr

Re: standalone firewall connections

2003-07-22 Thread Kirby Clements
First off, sorry for the duplicate message. with subject "PPP over 56k". I have to switch email addresses to get to this list and thought I had not done so. Thanks bigtime for your information Michael. I indeed forgot to give my NIC card a different IP than the actual machine, and since my know

Re: network logon?

2003-07-22 Thread Michael Gargiullo
It doesn't quite work like that, that I've used. You can mount Windows shares like so: smbmount -rw username=cwiegand,password=whatever //ntserver/share /networkshares/share On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 15:22, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I recently set up a test box on my network with an NT4 PDC. How d

network logon?

2003-07-22 Thread chip . wiegand
I recently set up a test box on my network with an NT4 PDC. How do I get RH9 to log into/authenticate with the PDC? -- Chip Wiegand Computer Services Simrad, Inc www.simradusa.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] "There is no reason anyone would want a computer in their home." --Ken Olson, president, chai

network connecting through 56K via linux

2003-07-22 Thread Kirby Clements
This is an issue of connections in general, being that I don't even have the firewall turned on yet. The new standalone firewall box I have built is now connecting via PPP with wvdial, a great little tool. The firewall, be it shorewall or if I just decide to use ipchains with lokkit, is off. Th

Re: standalone firewall connections

2003-07-22 Thread Michael Gargiullo
WOW... OK... Kirby Let's address things one at a time if we can here. On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 15:26, Kirby Clements wrote: > > I have assigned the linux firewall a 192.168.0.0 address, being that I > don't see that address taken on the network. OK... 192.168.0.0 won't be seen on the network.

Re: standalone firewall connections

2003-07-22 Thread Edward Croft
On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 15:26, Kirby Clements wrote: > This is an issue of connections in general, being that I don't even > have the firewall turned on yet. > > The new standalone firewall box I have built is now connecting via PPP > with wvdial, a great little tool. > The firewall, be it shorewa

RE: (no subject)

2003-07-22 Thread Stuart Clark
Try mailscanner here http://www.sng.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailscanner/ I use amavis with exim here www.amavis.org Regards Stuart Clark -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of the brilliant beast Sent: Wednesday, 23 July 2003 2:26 AM To: [EMAIL PRO

Re: Solaris<->RH8 Backup

2003-07-22 Thread Samuel Flory
System Administrator wrote: On Monday 21 July 2003 18:25, Samuel Flory wrote: System Administrator wrote: I need to backup a Solaris 8 system (actually parts therein) to a RH8 box. I am currently doing that using a simple scp (secure copy) script. The RH8 filesystem is ext3. Question 1) Wh

RE: Boot loader

2003-07-22 Thread Stuart Clark
Guys, How do I know which bootloader I am using (lilo/grub)? When you boot up grub has a splash screen with Grub on top L/H/S I can use kickstart, but do not know what to do with ks.cfg once i save the configuration. Save it to a boot disk in the root directory. Then type ks=floppy when you

standalone firewall connections

2003-07-22 Thread Kirby Clements
This is an issue of connections in general, being that I don't even have the firewall turned on yet. The new standalone firewall box I have built is now connecting via PPP with wvdial, a great little tool. The firewall, be it shorewall or if I just decide to use ipchains with lokkit, is off. Th

RE: VPN

2003-07-22 Thread Keith Morse
On Sun, 20 Jul 2003, Chris Johnston wrote: > Ooops. But then again, I went off about the difference without directly > answering his question. > > Almost any NAT device will allow isakmp nat-traversal to take place. > However, does RedHat directly support said feature? Dunno - unless, of > cour

Re: ATi driver

2003-07-22 Thread Joseph A Nagy Jr
On Tuesday 22 July 2003 13:20, Nicholas Meyer wrote this in an attempt to be witty and informative: > Has anybody gotten the ATi Linux driver to work in RedHat 9, or does > anybody know if the next version of XFree will have 3D support for > the R300 series of chips? I'd like to switch completely

ATi driver

2003-07-22 Thread Nicholas Meyer
Has anybody gotten the ATi Linux driver to work in RedHat 9, or does anybody know if the next version of XFree will have 3D support for the R300 series of chips? I'd like to switch completely over to RedHat and get rid of Windows, but that won't be possible until I can get 3D acceleration working.

Re: [OT] Does this mean that IP was proven on the SCO case?

2003-07-22 Thread Michael Gargiullo
On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 13:01, Rick Warner wrote: > On Mon, 2003-07-21 at 19:07, Edward Dekkers wrote: > > > > > > SCO has a lot to prove. If they prove the case against IBM then that > > > will affect IBM and its customers. But since this is a contract > > > dispute, it can only affect parties i

backup mac server from linux?

2003-07-22 Thread gregory mott
hello redhatters, is there a reasonable way to backup a mac server from linux? or am i betteroff to just get netatalk and originate the copy from the mac? tia, greg -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

New Kernel, BOOT image. What is it?

2003-07-22 Thread Wartnick, James
I have an SMP machine and appropriately have the "smp" kernel. There is a new patched kernel available, When I ran up2date, it installed 3 kernel's: a smp kernel a non-smp kernel and a BOOT kernel What the heck is a BOOT kernel, and should it be my default? Any help appreciated. > Jim Wa

Re: [OT] Does this mean that IP was proven on the SCO case?

2003-07-22 Thread Rick Warner
On Mon, 2003-07-21 at 19:07, Edward Dekkers wrote: > > > SCO has a lot to prove. If they prove the case against IBM then that > > will affect IBM and its customers. But since this is a contract > > dispute, it can only affect parties involved in the contract. I never > > signed any agreement w

Re: Kernels and RHN

2003-07-22 Thread Rodolfo J. Paiz
At 7/22/2003 12:25 +1000, you wrote: 4. Why do I get email notifications from RHN for errata against my systems where the email says it applies to my systems but none of them have the package installed or showing up the in the errata lists? This is the only one where I have a clue. Run "up2date -p"

Re: Ideas for a BIG project!

2003-07-22 Thread Rodolfo J. Paiz
At 7/22/2003 01:29 -0700, you wrote: While redhat linux project deal with issue of speed development in one aspect(how fast the OS release), my project AIM at improving the developmental quality and speed at the same time. Obviously, they may have VERY NICE groupware to improve the efficency of

Re: No Wine on RH9.0 ?

2003-07-22 Thread Joseph A Nagy Jr
On Tuesday 22 July 2003 08:59, Kent Borg wrote this in an attempt to be witty and informative: > On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 12:25:33AM -0500, Joseph A Nagy Jr wrote: > > Wine is in 9.0. > > Are you sure? I don't see it in my "everything" install. > > -kb It was installed by default for me and I did

Re: (no subject)

2003-07-22 Thread the brilliant beast
what are some good antivirus products for linux? also I thaught viruses in linux weren't possible? - Original Message - From: "Daniel Tan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 12:21 AM Subject: Re: (no subject) > yes u shld..use mailscanner with an anti

Re: ftp return parameter

2003-07-22 Thread Ed Wilts
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 09:09:01AM -0700, Sambit Nanda wrote: > Hi, > is there any way to capture the ftp status from ftp > prompt. > for example, from prompt ftp> send filename.txt > then i want to capture whether ftp is sucess or not > to my shell script variable, can i do this ? Use nc

hotplug/usb - how to make it work

2003-07-22 Thread Dan Bar Dov
I'm using RedHat AS-2.1 on an IBM HS20 server. The documentation of hotplug say I need to install an init.d service to deal with "coldplugs". However, when I try the service, it complains that the USB_DEVFS is not available. Indeed I see that there is no /proc/bus/usb at all, however the kernel I

Re: [OT] Does this mean that IP was proven on the SCO case?

2003-07-22 Thread Jonathan Bartlett
> That is a disputed argument. If this code had slipped in without their > prior knowledge and consent and they didn't notice it until lately this > GPL argument doesn't fly. The fact that they didn't notice it for years > makes them look quite silly, but it is not a justification for stealing > I

ftp return parameter

2003-07-22 Thread Sambit Nanda
Hi, is there any way to capture the ftp status from ftp prompt. for example, from prompt ftp> send filename.txt then i want to capture whether ftp is sucess or not to my shell script variable, can i do this ? = Thanks, Sambit Nanda 203-553-3424 (O) -- redhat-list mailing list un

Re: [OT] Does this mean that IP was proven on the SCO case?

2003-07-22 Thread Lorenzo Prince
Leonard den Ottolander staggered into view and mumbled: > Not exactly. They are trying to get people to pay for their IP they > claim slipped into Linux (and was overseen by both Caldera and SCO for > years). A little like SuSE making people pay for their installer > (YaST). Big difference is t

Re: [OT] Does this mean that IP was proven on the SCO case?

2003-07-22 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
Hi Mark, > Furthermore, there *is* the FACT that until days after the lawsuit, they > had their own version of Linux on their official Website...*and* all of > Linux is under the GPL. That is a disputed argument. If this code had slipped in without their prior knowledge and consent and they did

RE: [OT] Does this mean that IP was proven on the SCO case?

2003-07-22 Thread Michael Kalus
> A little like SuSE making people pay for their installer > (YaST). Big difference is that we know where YaST came from > but have no > clue about the IP SCO wants to license. Is it really? I am not so sure, was YAST ever licensed under the GPL? Even so, the GPL doesn't prevent someone from ch

Re: redhat-list digest, Vol 1 #8151 - 50 msgs

2003-07-22 Thread mark
On Tuesday 22 July 2003 09:04 am, > From: Edward Dekkers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > http://www.arnnet.com.au/index.php?id=1679444165&eid=-100 > > Surely some clever programmers can just re-write the offending code so > as not to breach IP? (from memory wasn't it the TCP/IP stack?) This will > not sav

Re: [OT] Does this mean that IP was proven on the SCO case?

2003-07-22 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
Hi Lorenzo, > Hmm. SCO is trying to license Linux under a non-GPL-compatible license. > Isn't THIS illegal? They could get into some VERY serious trouble for > this. Not exactly. They are trying to get people to pay for their IP they claim slipped into Linux (and was overseen by both Caldera

Opteron Processor

2003-07-22 Thread Christian Fredrickson
I would like to create a database server using dual Opteron processors. I read that Redhat planned to support the Opteron, but I cannot find any information on what versions of Redhat will support the Opteron. Does anyone have any information or suggestions? Thank you, Chris -- redhat-list mai

Boot loader

2003-07-22 Thread Vij Chau
Guys, How do I know which bootloader I am using (lilo/grub)? I can use kickstart, but do not know what to do with ks.cfg once i save the configuration. The problem is I am trying to use "hiddenmenu" option in GRUB. But no matter how I change the /boot/grub/grub.conf or /boot/grub/menu/1st or /et

Re: P2P Software Recommendation?

2003-07-22 Thread Lee Flier
On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 09:57, David Hollister wrote: > As a developer on Furthur, I'm compelled to respond and say > "Furthurnet". :) > > Of course, this would only interest you if you are interested in the > bands that Furthurnet allows trading of, and those are only bands that > allow the free

Re: Load Balancing & Round Robin

2003-07-22 Thread Chris Wilson
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 12:38:04PM -0700, Sevatio wrote: > What would I need to setup two Apache servers to serve the same domain > name using load balancing & round robin? Each user session must be > limited to one server. And it must be able to sense when one of the > ser

Re: Software-RAID Issues on RH7.2

2003-07-22 Thread Ricky Boone
Haven't seen a response from anyone concerning this issue, so ... *bump* :) I am still quite a n00b when it comes to the kernel, but someone mentioned making a new RAM-disk to include the RAID-1 module using mkinitrd. Since the machine in question is a remote box, screwing around with something

Re: No Wine on RH9.0 ?

2003-07-22 Thread Kent Borg
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 12:25:33AM -0500, Joseph A Nagy Jr wrote: > Wine is in 9.0. Are you sure? I don't see it in my "everything" install. -kb -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: P2P Software Recommendation?

2003-07-22 Thread David Hollister
On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 00:10, Nick Wilson wrote: > Hi all, > > What are the best P2P music share packages for Linux? Clearly they need > to be popular but not being any kind of /spyware/ is real important > too > > Any recommendations or comments most welcome and appreciated. > > Thsnks As

Problem with wu-ftp

2003-07-22 Thread Jim Marshall
I have setup wu-ftpd 2.6.2.8 on my machine, non-passive mode works great, but passive mode is not working. I have setup the ftpaccess with the correct external IP address and a range of ports (which I have opened in my router). When someone logs in and issues any command in passive mode the client

Re: djbdns install problems

2003-07-22 Thread Mark Neidorff
On Mon, 21 Jul 2003, Jason Williams wrote: > Let me correct really quick. this happened when I attempted to install the > daemontools. > > Jason > > At 01:51 PM 7/21/2003 -0700, you wrote: > >Well, I seem to be having a rough day today. > > > >I was installing djbdns today on one of our test Re

Re: [OT] Does this mean that IP was proven on the SCO case?

2003-07-22 Thread Lorenzo Prince
Hmm. SCO is trying to license Linux under a non-GPL-compatible license. Isn't THIS illegal? They could get into some VERY serious trouble for this. Lorenzo Prince happy Red Hat 9 user ;) -- There are two types of Linux developers - those who can spell, and those who can't. There is a constan

Thanks all (KDE/Gnome Alternatives)

2003-07-22 Thread David Hart
Lots of good responses to my question. At the moment I'm trying IceWM which seems to be exactly what I was looking for. -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

  1   2   >