My RH9 System is connected to 2 port Data Transport
Swtich, When i change my switch knob from Linux to
Window and then come back to Linux , my mouse does not
work in linux, I had reported this problem before
also, but unfortunately no one respond to my question.
I never had this type of problem
I'll bet you have a scroll mouse? I had the same problem. I set the
mouse to generic 3 button mouse and it now works, without the scroll, of
course.
I went thru the same thing a while ago, found no answers, and settled
for the above work around.
Harry
Edward Dekkers wrote:
My RH9 System is
Harish wrote:
Hi Ed,
Really appreciate your speedy resonse,pls find below the errors that I
got, this was after I had written the eniries in the rc.local file and
then rebooted the machine yestrerday night.Will try giving the full path
and let u know.
Thanks Once Again
Harish
Sep 23 23:54:49
Dont be so rude. we linux users need to stick together, and if
friendships are formed over linux than it is a good thing!
So, reconsider your comment, please
Felix
Felix, Jason wasn't being rude at all. He is in fact correct. Meeting
linux friends is not what this list is about. I personally
By router I presume you mean SMTP mail server. If that's what you mean
then SpamAssassin is very good
www.spamassassin.org
Gordon
-Original Message-
From: Simon Tischer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 13 August 2003 09:28
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: spam filter
hi c
can anyone
e
already accomplished this task)
Many
thanks,
James D. Parra [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-From: Brandon Harris
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2003 12:51
PMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE: Spam killing
with Redhat 9 before e-mail reaches Exchange.
On Mon, 2003-06-02 at 12:27, James D. Parra wrote:
Hello,
We have Sendmail running on RH 7.3, forwarding mail to an Exchange
server. Installed SpamAssassin and have not yet found *details* on how
to successfully integrate it with Sendmail. Would like to configure
SpamAssassin to add
Mohammed Awad wrote:
Hi all, I need someone to tell me about some good reference to push
me into the field of programming of the Linux Network subsystem. I
need to write a code to implement some additional functionality for
the NAT protocol.
http://www.netfilter.org/
Specifically, you want to
We have Sendmail running on RH 7.3, forwarding mail to an Exchange
server. Installed SpamAssassin and have not yet found *details* on how
to successfully integrate it with Sendmail. Would like to configure
SpamAssassin to add *SPAM* to the Subject line of each
suspected email and
Pauly wrote:
- I don't wanna use LD_LIBRARY_PATH, due to the known reasons.
What known reasons?
And even as I set LD_LIBRARY_PATH in /etc/profile, gnome isn't starting
correctly, cause it can't find the old gtk 2.0 libs then.
Then only set the variable for the program, when you run it. It
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I see most people are telling you to use some tool besides sendmail,
which does not answer your question. Yes, sendmail can block spam
for you. go to /etc/mail/sendmail.mc
Add the following lines (if they're not already there)
to
protect a site then it's not going to be very helpful for me.
Thanks.
Jason Cordes
LeTigre Computing
713.681.8844
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Cowles, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 8:54 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Spam blocking
hi,
you may also want to check amavis (www.amavis.org) it combines virus
scanning and spam (using spam assasin) with a milter filter. requires some
knoweldge of perl, patience during install, and bit of coffee. you'll need
virus scanning software (it supports many common ones).
cheers
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 09:02:19AM -0600, Jason Cordes wrote:
I'm using a rbl on my sendmail server here for my company but that has only
lightly cut down on the amount of spam some of my users get. Is spamassasin
only used to protect a single persons email or can it be used to protect a
site?
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 05:32:56PM +0200, christopher cuse wrote:
...
scanning and spam (using spam assasin) with a milter filter. requires some
knoweldge of perl, patience during install, and bit of coffee. you'll need
Hi Chris - to paraphrase your text back at you :-) - Could you please
spamassassin is include with RH9. Although, probably not gui configurable
along with the redhat sendmail gui. But yes, blocking open relays only
helps a little. Spam still comes via legitamate gateways.
IMHO, MIMEDefang can block spam without the need for spamassassin - and it
would be at the
. :(
Jason Cordes
LeTigre Computing
713.681.8844
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Ed Wilts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 9:47 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Spam blocking for Sendmail
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 09:02:19AM -0600, Jason Cordes wrote
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 09:46:47AM -0600, Ed Wilts wrote:
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 09:02:19AM -0600, Jason Cordes wrote:
I'm using a rbl on my sendmail server here for my company but that has only
lightly cut down on the amount of spam some of my users get. Is spamassasin
only used to
On Wed, 2 Apr 2003, Ed Wilts wrote:
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 09:02:19AM -0600, Jason Cordes wrote:
I'm using a rbl on my sendmail server here for my company but that has only
lightly cut down on the amount of spam some of my users get. Is spamassasin
only used to protect a single persons
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 10:05:15AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
. If
your conserned about false positives then RBL is the wrong way to go!
I should have clarified my original statements. There are good RBLs and
there are
procmail?
- Original Message -
From: Scott Skrogstad [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 16:47
Subject: Spam blocking for Sendmail
I have a virtual server that serves about 8 domains. We are getting a ton
of
junk mail and I am wondering what I can use
On Tue, 1 Apr 2003 17:24:45 -0800, David Busby wrote
procmail?
- Original Message -
From: Scott Skrogstad [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 16:47
Subject: Spam blocking for Sendmail
I have a virtual server that serves about 8 domains. We are
On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 06:47:32PM -0600, Scott Skrogstad wrote:
I have a virtual server that serves about 8 domains. We are getting a ton of
junk mail and I am wondering what I can use with Sendmail to help cut down on
the spam that I am recieving?
It depends on the spam you're receiving
-Original Message-
From: Scott Skrogstad
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 6:48 PM
Subject: Spam blocking for Sendmail
I have a virtual server that serves about 8 domains. We are
getting a ton of junk mail and I am wondering what I can use
with Sendmail to help cut down on the
On Sat, 2003-03-22 at 10:27, Matt wrote:
is there away that I can block spam when using Evolution or do I have to
set up a Filter on every spam that I get
You can set up a filter to use 'spamc -c'. Make sure that spamd is
running (on RH 8 you can find it under Server Settings-Services, check
On Sat, Mar 22, 2003 at 01:27:26PM -0500, Matt wrote:
is there away that I can block spam when using Evolution or do I have to
set up a Filter on every spam that I get
Thanks
use SPEWS in your procmail file.
http://www.spews.org/faq.html
Don't have a procmail file ?
Is URL still valid?
-eric wood
From: Jeff Kinz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
use SPEWS in your procmail file.
http://www.spews.org/faq.html
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Comes up OK for me.
Try 216.65.63.102 if it could be a DNS issue.
Eric Wood wrote:
Is URL still valid?
-eric wood
From: Jeff Kinz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
use SPEWS in your procmail file.
http://www.spews.org/faq.html
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You need a separate SCSI controller to drive the DLT drive. It
isn't a RAID device.
Brad
Hi! I've got a bit of a problem with my DLT tape drive connected
to pc server running redhat 7.1. The DLT drive is daisychained
with my ciprico 6500 raid array and both are detected by the
system.
It is likely that you don't have /dev/st0 linked to /dev/tape.
Do this:
mt rewind /dev/st0
and see if the tape starts humming. If so, create a symlink to /dev/st0
called /dev/tape.
JAV
On Mon, 2003-03-10 at 07:46, Brad Alpert wrote:
You need a separate SCSI controller to drive the DLT
How about just remove this guy from the list! I will probably get another one
in response to this one!
In response to my post to the list
From: Mike Vanecek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: New List Robot Spam?
I receive this:
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003 10:28:07 -0600,
Mike Vanecek wrote:
How about just remove this guy from the list! I will probably get another one
in response to this one!
I sent a message to redhat-list-admin describing the situation and
requesting that he unsubscribe the offender. You are all encouraged to do
the same.
In the meantime, I
He's already being filtered on my end. heehehehehehe :-)
Mike Vanecek wrote:
How about just remove this guy from the list! I will probably get another one
in response to this one!
In response to my post to the list
From: Mike Vanecek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Forwarded Message ---
From: Anthony E. Greene [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 13:24:42 -0500
Subject: Re: *SPAM* RE: Re: New List Robot Spam? (verification)
Mike Vanecek wrote:
How about just remove this guy from the list! I
on. If we all did
that, we would flood their server fill it's logs, so on.
- -Original Message-
From: Robert Canary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 1:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: *SPAM* RE: Re: New List Robot Spam?
(verification)
He's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I guess that would be a DOS, though, and therefore unethical, huh?
- -Original Message-
From: Burke, Thomas G.
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 2:20 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: *SPAM* RE: Re: New List Robot Spam
Burke, Thomas G. said:
I guess that would be a DOS, though, and therefore unethical, huh?
I wouldn't consider it a DOS, it is their system initiating the
connection. If you REJECT a message that should not generate any
additional messages from your server, but it may generate one on
the remote
christian hogue said:
SPAM: Start SpamAssassin results --
SPAM: This mail is probably spam. The original message has been altered
SPAM: so you can recognise or block similar unwanted mail in future.
SPAM: See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more
I am currently running RH8.0 workstation on a Microsoft Small
Business Server Network that uses Microsoft's ISA server. I am
having problems accessing the internet on this machine. If i
connect the machine directly to the router (which is not a long or
short term option) it works fine. Is
Download a vanilla tree:
http://www.kernel.org
Don't use the RPM, use a kernel from there, and you will have all the
arch's that are supported.
js
On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 18:44, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SPAM: Start SpamAssassin results --
SPAM: This
John Nichel's reply wound up getting spamassassin'ed, but it is
included below the SA header.
No, the internal server's IP can not be hit from outside the
network, as it is on a private network. Private networks, of
course, are not routable :) However, an external ping to the
internal server's
I did a LoadModule mod_proxy.so in Apache, which is a perfectly fine
way to do it in 2.x, evidently.
I did do ProxyPass and ProxyPassReverse with zero results.
Everything still came back to the original, main server instead of
redirecting over to the target machine inside the network.
I could
From what I read, ProxyPass and ProxyPassReverse will only take from
the path of a URL, and redirect it in one way or another
http://www.somedomain.com/my_web/foo can be redirected to
http://www.foo.com with an entry like this...
ProxyPass /my_web/foo http://www.foo.com
Which isn't what
Try looking in /var/log/messages, or /var/log/secure to see why
authentication fails.
js
Yes I have tried that. Same sort of problem occurs.
Thanks,
Steve
- Original Message -
From: Emmanuel Seyman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002
You need to add it to your kernel boot-up. It depends on if you use
grub or lilo.
in lilo you will add an 'append=mem=3Dnopentium
in grub, add it to your kernel line for each kernel you have i.e:
[/boot/grub/menu.lst]
kernel /boot/vmlinuz-2.4.18-4SGI_XFS_1.1 rw root=/dev/hda3 hdc=ide-scsi
Does anyone know where the PRM's are located ?
rpmfind.net for all your rpm finding needs :)
steve
--
redhat-list mailing list
Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Scott Skrogstad wrote:
What can I do locally to combat spam? I run a small ISP and my users are
getting just tons of spam mail...
Add something like SpamAssassin or Vipul's Razor to your mail system
Add checks against the DNSBLs. If you don't do mail business with
check out spamassasin
freshmeat.net/projects/spamassassin/?topic_id=29
- Original Message -
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 9:42 AM
Subject: SPAM
| What can I do locally to combat spam? I run a small ISP and my users are
| getting just tons of spam mail...
|
| Thanks in advance,
|
|
Hello Scott,
Wednesday, July 31, 2002, 12:42:14 PM, you textually orated:
SS What can I do locally to combat spam? I run a small ISP and my users are
SS getting just tons of spam mail...
Spamassassin!
It has been working wonderfully for me. Only 3 out of ~900 spam messages
have gotten
Spamassassain would be a good move. We use it and it has done wonders for
us.
Jon
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Scott Skrogstad wrote:
What can I do locally to combat spam? I run a small ISP and my users are
getting just tons of spam mail...
Thanks in advance,
--
Is it very hard to install and maintain?
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Brian Ashe wrote:
Hello Scott,
Wednesday, July 31, 2002, 12:42:14 PM, you textually orated:
SS What can I do locally to combat spam? I run a small ISP and my users are
SS getting just tons of spam mail...
Spamassassin!
Mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 10:34 AM
Subject: Re: SPAM
Spamassassain would be a good move. We use it and it has done wonders for
us.
Jon
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Scott Skrogstad wrote:
What can I do locally to combat spam? I run a small ISP and my users
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Scott Skrogstad wrote:
Is it very hard to install and maintain?
I've been adminning for a few years, so it wasn't terribly difficult. That
said, it's literally download, configure, make, make install. Then read the
docs. Or read the docs first. The spamc/spamd
The really nice thing about Spam Assassin is it's also really easy to
install as a user. So you can play around with it in your own
account, and make sure you like it, and know how to use it properly.
Then once you're really comfortable with it, you can install it as root,
and have it work for
You may want to look into a pkg called Spam Assassin, this would greatly help
you in your spam war.
Cheers,
Aly.
Scott Skrogstad wrote:
What can I do locally to combat spam? I run a small ISP and my users are
getting just tons of spam mail...
Thanks in advance,
--
Actually, there are SpamAssassin RPMS available.
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Scott Skrogstad wrote:
Is it very hard to install and maintain?
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Brian Ashe wrote:
Hello Scott,
Wednesday, July 31, 2002, 12:42:14 PM, you textually orated:
SS What can I do locally to
Does anyone know where the PRM's are located ?
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Mike Burger wrote:
Actually, there are SpamAssassin RPMS available.
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Scott Skrogstad wrote:
Is it very hard to install and maintain?
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Brian Ashe wrote:
Hello Scott,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 31 July 2002 08:25 pm, Scott Skrogstad wrote:
Does anyone know where the PRM's are located ?
You could try the ones in rawhide:
/pub/redhat/linux/rawhide/i386/RedHat/RPMS/spamassassin-2.31-14.i386.rpm
- --
- -Michael
pgp key:
.
ism
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Gerry Doris
Envoyé : mardi 12 mars 2002 17:19
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Re: *SPAM* Re: [HS] SPAM
SPAM: Start SpamAssassin results
-- SPAM: This mail
Samba has nothing, whatsoever, to do with spam or email.
On Wed, 13 Mar 2002, Ismael Touama wrote:
OKHEY! thanks,
You filter spam with spamassins.
So you mean samba + spamassins ?
Don't ever use samba cause my server's not on the LAN
(not funny, just time for me to get my server more
SPAM: Start SpamAssassin results
-- SPAM: This mail is probably spam. The original
message has been altered SPAM: so you can recognise or block similar
unwanted mail in future. SPAM: See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for
more details.
SPAM:
SPAM:
Whats the best way to stop spammers - what rules does sendmail 8.11.6 come
(the m4 rules) that may help. Is RBL the best way? I've seen a lot of
information on www.mail-abuse.org, just after some comments before I make
my
choice.
I've done a bunch of testing to try and detect and/or stop
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 11:57:01AM -, Chris Bond wrote:
Anybody got any good advice for doing the following. I am going to
run a script that pulls my incoming email from my ISP via pop3 and
feed it into my local smtp server. Currently running the redhat 7.2
default sendmail (minus a
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 11:33:15AM -0500, Hal Burgiss wrote:
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 11:57:01AM -, Chris Bond wrote:
Anybody got any good advice for doing the following. I am going to
run a script that pulls my incoming email from my ISP via pop3 and
feed it into my local smtp
On Mon, 05 Feb 2001, you wrote:
Please help!
We are attacked since 03. Feb with mails "Free 2-way MOTOROLA Pager"
with
approx 200 emails to various illegal addresses.
The mails are coming in intervals of 5 min from 01-032.055.popsite.net
[216.126.153.32] and 01-016.055.popsite.net
Use the access file in /etc/mail to deny the users or ips or domainname ..
Kiran
On Mon, 5 Feb 2001, Szemerdy Gbor wrote:
Please help!
We are attacked since 03. Feb with mails "Free 2-way MOTOROLA Pager"
with
approx 200 emails to various illegal addresses.
The mails are coming in
66 matches
Mail list logo
