On Thu, 2003-10-16 at 11:26, Randall J. Parr wrote:
> Any idea where and/or when I could find Mozilla 1.4.1 RPM's and/or
> Mozilla 1.5.0 RPM's
> for Red Hat 8? Red Hat 9?
>
They are available on the RH FTP in the Rawhide area. However, the
Mozilla source has an installati
On Thu, 2003-10-16 at 11:26, Randall J. Parr wrote:
> Any idea where and/or when I could find Mozilla 1.4.1 RPM's and/or
> Mozilla 1.5.0 RPM's
> for Red Hat 8? Red Hat 9?
>
> Thanks
> R.Parr, RHCE
> Temporal Arts
You might try mozilla.org for the latest.
Any idea where and/or when I could find Mozilla 1.4.1 RPM's and/or
Mozilla 1.5.0 RPM's
for Red Hat 8? Red Hat 9?
Thanks
R.Parr, RHCE
Temporal Arts
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 1:54 PM
> To: RedHat-List
> Subject: Findig RPM's?
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> Quick one: How can I find the x11 headers? -- I need to install
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 23 September 2003 02:54 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Quick one: How can I find the x11 headers? -- I need to install
> x11-devel and have cd's but know that there must be an easy way of
> finding what I want with up2date or rpm
* and then Ed Wilts declared
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 08:54:03PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > Quick one: How can I find the x11 headers? -- I need to install
> > x11-devel and have cd's but know that there must be an easy way of
> > finding what I want with up2date or rpm?
>
> #
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 08:54:03PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Quick one: How can I find the x11 headers? -- I need to install
> x11-devel and have cd's but know that there must be an easy way of
> finding what I want with up2date or rpm?
# up2date --showall > up2date.showall
I run this
use redhat-config-packages to install x11 development packages of
you can use apt to install them you can downaload apt from
www.freshrpms.net
--
Nurullah Akkaya
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Registered Linux User #301438
What lies behind us and what lies before us are tiny
matters compared to what lies
Hi all,
Quick one: How can I find the x11 headers? -- I need to install
x11-devel and have cd's but know that there must be an easy way of
finding what I want with up2date or rpm?
Many thanks...
--
Nick W
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.co
Evening everyone.
Well, I was trying to build some RPMS from a cyrus-sasl source rpm
available here:
http://tis.foobar.fi/software/?sasl
Everyone was going fine, until I hit a snag on the build.
Here is the error:
digestmd5.c:64:19: des.h: No such file or directory
make[2]: *** [digestmd5.lo]
Lorenzo, you are a god-send!
Why didnt someone point this program out before??!?!?
I'm giving it a go now..thanks again!
Logan
From: Lorenzo Prince <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Dependancies and RPM's
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 11
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] upload]# rpm -Uvh gd-2.0.12-2.i386.rpm
> warning: gd-2.0.12-2.i386.rpm: V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 897da07a
> error: Failed dependencies:
> libgd.so.1.8 is needed by (installed) php-4.2.2-17.2
> libgd.so.1.8 is needed by (installed) webalizer-2.01_10-11
>
Anton Piatek staggered into view and mumbled:
> www.freshrpms.net has a copy of apt, and loads of build rpms for it as well.
Thanks for that one. I did a google search myself and promptly forgot the address. 8-}
Lorenzo Prince
--
I did this 'cause Linux gives me a woody. It doesn't generate re
www.freshrpms.net has a copy of apt, and loads of build rpms for it as well.
Anton
On Monday 14 Jul 2003 4:25 pm, Lorenzo Prince wrote:
> Try installing the apt-get package. You may have to do a google search for
> it, but once you get it you'll wonder how you ever got by without it. Once
> ap
Try installing the apt-get package. You may have to do a google search for it, but
once you get it you'll wonder how
you ever got by without it. Once apt-get is installed, all you have to do is type
apt-get install gd
and it will automatically download the RPM and install it. It will also au
Hi all,
I am trying to get (what I thought was) a simple package installed to enable
me to produce some graphs in PHP.
Aparently the GD library will enable this but it requires a few things to be
installed. I thought it was the font libraries but I have these already. Im
not using a GUI in Redh
> On my system at liest, redhat rpms are compiled basically (default
> settings) with -march i386 -mcpu i686. Though I am not very educated
> about asm instructions, I wouldn't bleive they would run on a pentium
> (i586) machine.
They should run on an i586. -march is the instruction set, so if it
On Tue, 2003-07-08 at 01:11, Joseph A Nagy Jr wrote:
> On Monday 07 July 2003 18:00, SAWYER Charlotte M wrote in an attempt to
> be witty and informative:
> > I know in some cases I've seen 686 rpms though..
>
>
> I've seen them too, and they won't install unless you have a i686 based
> pro
On Mon, 7 Jul 2003, Benjamin J. Weiss wrote:
> Okay, this is probably a silly question, but:
>
> I've got a Pentium III Coppermine (Celeron?) 866 MHz processor. Now, I
> typically install from RPM's, because it's so easy. But I was just
> thinking that many of thes
On Monday 07 July 2003 18:00, SAWYER Charlotte M wrote in an attempt to
be witty and informative:
> I know in some cases I've seen 686 rpms though..
I've seen them too, and they won't install unless you have a i686 based
processor
--
Wielder of the mighty +1 LARTsaber of Unsubscribe Instru
> I've got a Pentium III Coppermine (Celeron?) 866 MHz processor. Now, I
> typically install from RPM's, because it's so easy. But I was just
> thinking that many of these RPM's have i386 or noarch in their names.
> Does this mean that they're running slower
I know in some cases I've seen 686 rpms though..
-Original Message-
From: Joseph A Nagy Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 07, 2003 3:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Do i386 RPM's take advantage of new processors?
On Monday 07 July 2003 17:22, Benjami
On Monday 07 July 2003 17:22, Benjamin J. Weiss wrote in an attempt to
be witty and informative:
> Okay, this is probably a silly question, but:
>
> I've got a Pentium III Coppermine (Celeron?) 866 MHz processor. Now,
> I typically install from RPM's, because it'
Okay, this is probably a silly question, but:
I've got a Pentium III Coppermine (Celeron?) 866 MHz processor. Now, I
typically install from RPM's, because it's so easy. But I was just
thinking that many of these RPM's have i386 or noarch in their names.
Does this mean
Alrighty, There it is..
Thanks!
:-)
--- Bill Tangren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dave Altonaga wrote:
> > --- Edward Dekkers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >>Dave Altonaga wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>Greets,
> >>>
> >>>I noticed this when I've tried to install xine.
> >>
> >>Most
> >>
> >>
Dave Altonaga wrote:
--- Edward Dekkers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Dave Altonaga wrote:
Greets,
I noticed this when I've tried to install xine.
Most
of the rpms would install ( at least I think they
did)
but after trying to install xine ui it stated that
I
needed other libs inorder to install
--- Edward Dekkers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Dave Altonaga wrote:
>
> > Greets,
> >
> > I noticed this when I've tried to install xine.
> Most
> > of the rpms would install ( at least I think they
> did)
> > but after trying to install xine ui it stated that
> I
> > needed other libs inorder
Dave Altonaga wrote:
Greets,
I noticed this when I've tried to install xine. Most
of the rpms would install ( at least I think they did)
but after trying to install xine ui it stated that I
needed other libs inorder to install. These lib I
already installed prior to this. then after all that
no r
Greets,
I noticed this when I've tried to install xine. Most
of the rpms would install ( at least I think they did)
but after trying to install xine ui it stated that I
needed other libs inorder to install. These lib I
already installed prior to this. then after all that
no rpms will work. They ma
Hi,
On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, funtom wrote:
> How i can build form a kernel.source.rpm (update) i686 Binary rpm's on rhas 2.1 ?
> With "rpm -ba kernel-2.4.9.spec" i have only i386 rpm's.
There are two ways:
1. (shorter one) rpmbuild --rebuild --target i686 /path/to/src/rp
Hello,
How i can build form a kernel.source.rpm (update) i686 Binary rpm's on rhas
2.1 ?
With "rpm -ba kernel-2.4.9.spec" i have only i386 rpm's.
I can't found a Document or a Howto about redhat source Rpm's.
regards,
thomas
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsub
Hello,
How i can build form a kernel.source.rpm
(update) i686 Binary rpm's on rhas 2.1 ?
With "rpm -ba kernel-2.4.9.spec" i have only i386
rpm's.
regards,
thomas
aging:
http://www.owlriver.com/projects/fedora/fedora-flow.txt
This is not the say that the current RPM.ORG rpm's signed by
JBJ (similar to the latest -ac kernel, or an HavocP gnome
goodie) and at:
ftp://ftp.rpm.org/pub/rpm/dist/rpm-4.1.x/
- and-
ftp://ftp.rpm.org/pub/rpm/dist/rpm-
On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 02:40:37AM -0600, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
>
>My question is, why hasn't Red Hat fixed this problem yet?
Jeff Johnson has released new versions of rpm 4.x but these
apparently still have issues.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89290>
Emmanuel
Edward Dekkers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I was going to refer you to the Q & A site Aly is putting up, as this is
>a FAQ, but I notice the submission I made is not on there yet.
Your submission is in the queue ;-)
We are now in reorganizing the team and LaTeX-Sources in order to be
more flexib
Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
Edward Dekkers wrote:
I was going to refer you to the Q & A site Aly is putting up, as this
is a FAQ, but I notice the submission I made is not on there yet.
Here's the solution:
kill all instances of rpm
rm -f /var/lib/rpm/__db*
rpm --rebuilddb
My question is
Edward Dekkers wrote:
I was going to refer you to the Q & A site Aly is putting up, as this
is a FAQ, but I notice the submission I made is not on there yet.
Here's the solution:
kill all instances of rpm
rm -f /var/lib/rpm/__db*
rpm --rebuilddb
My question is, why hasn't Red Hat fixed
Jonathan Michael Nowacki wrote:
I'm trying to install tomcat by typing
$ rpm -ivv tomcat4-4.1.24-full.2jpp.noarch.rpm
I was going to refer you to the Q & A site Aly is putting up, as this is
a FAQ, but I notice the submission I made is not on there yet.
Here's the solution:
kill all instances
I'm trying to install tomcat by typing
$ rpm -ivv tomcat4-4.1.24-full.2jpp.noarch.rpm
then I see
D: == tomcat4-4.1.24-full.2jpp.noarch.rpm
D: Expected size: 4118895 = lead(96)+sigs(241)+pad(7)+data(4118551)
D: Actual size: 4118895
D: opening db environment /var/lib/rpm/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 7 Feb 2003 15:37:59 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> What exactly does the header files do while sitting in the up2date
> directory?
> Why would you keep them?
They are RPM package fragments and contains the package description
and manageme
rpm's on my machine. For each .rpm there is also a .hdr file. What is
a
hdr file and can I delete both of them from the spool? Also, is there
a
way to have rpm files automatically deleted from the spool once they
are installed?
Mark
Hi Mark!
I would keep the hdr (header) files perso
On Fri, 2003-02-07 at 23:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I noticed that my /var/spool/up2date is full of already installed
> rpm's on my machine. For each .rpm there is also a .hdr file. What is a
> hdr file and can I delete both of them from the spool? Also, is there a
> way
I noticed that my /var/spool/up2date is full of already installed
rpm's on my machine. For each .rpm there is also a .hdr file. What is a
hdr file and can I delete both of them from the spool? Also, is there a
way to have rpm files automatically deleted from the spool once they
are inst
Does anyone know if there is a RPM anywhere for Apache 2.0.41 or above? I
need it for coldfusion to work on my redhat 8 system. But since I am brand
to linux ,and have been reading, etc I still prefer the RPM at this
point. On the redhat FTP, the newest they seem to have is 2.0.40.
And if ther
he documentation
that comes with them.
[...]
> And: how do i find rpm's from the CD's? Are there anywhere a list of all
> available rpm's saved, so that i can search for them, or do i have to search
> them "by hand"
Michael Fratoni has written a tool called 'w
Hello,
how do i install a TV-Card on an redhat 8.0? Its a Fly Video 2 with a
Phillips Tuner.
My next problem is a HP 5200C USB-scanner, wich i wanna run. How do i
install it?
Arent there any programs in Redhat for these components? i'm a bit
dissatisfied!
And: how do i find rpm's fro
On 29 Dec 2002, Doug wrote:
> I have a quick question about rpm's.. I want to install the alsa sound
> system, freshrpms.net has the rpm's for this but it only has the
> 2.4.18.18 kernal rpm, and i'm running 2.4.18.19 kernel. I guess my
> question is can i just issue a
Hi all,
I have a quick question about rpm's.. I want to install the alsa sound
system, freshrpms.net has the rpm's for this but it only has the
2.4.18.18 kernal rpm, and i'm running 2.4.18.19 kernel. I guess my
question is can i just issue a rpm rebuild to bring it up to date wit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 21 December 2002 04:22 pm, Andy Kirk wrote:
> Thanks for the help, but more problems are now arising :-
>
> rpm -qa | grep mysqlreports :-
> mysql-3.23.52-3 (after many other MySQL packages were removed)
>
> rpm -e mysql-3.23.52-3
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David S. Wilkinson
Sent: Saturday, December 21, 2002 10:55 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Removing & Installing RPM's
Step 1) Checking RPM database for installed RPMs
Ok this example is taken from my RH7.
Michael,
It's probably the problem announced on bugtraq last week, described here:
http://security.e-matters.de/advisories/042002.html
Several organisations have released new mysql packages to fix this but I
haven't seen any mention about a Redhat fix. From the nature of the problem I
bet we'd
Hi,
here my "simple" answers:
[+] installing package: rpm -ivh package-file.rpm
[+] erasing/uninstall package: rpm -e package-name
For more detailed information visit the cool RPM-docu at redhat:
http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/linux/RHL-7.3-Manual/custom-guide/ch-rpm.html
Regards,
Arthur Mi
Step 1) Checking RPM database for installed RPMs
Ok this example is taken from my RH7.2 box. If you want to remove the rpms you first
need to know which ones are installed. You do this with the following command:
[root@intranet root]# rpm -qa |grep mysql
mysql-server-3.23.41-1
mysql-devel-3.23.41
I am new to Linux, and have been advised to solve a MySQL problem on RH8, I
need to remove the MySQL RPM that came with RH8, and load the MySQL 3.23.54
RPM from www.mysql.com.
My question is, what commands do I need to run to remove the existing RPM,
and then install the new RPM.
Thanks for a sim
Hello,
using Redhat 8.0 I am trying to compile freetype 2.1.2 from SRC RPM's. Here are
the steps I use:
rpm -ivh freetype-2.1.2-7.src.rpm
cd /usr/src/redhat/SPECS/
rpmbuild -bb freetype.spec
At the very end the following error message appears:
RPM build errors:
File not
Try a "rpm --rebuilddb"
On Thu, 2002-08-29 at 12:41, Patrick Beart wrote:
> Folks:
>
> OK, ... I'm going a bit crazy, here. 8P
>
> I'm using RH 7.2. I installed Webmin last night, from the
> RPM. Using the ...
>
> rpm -Uhv .rpm
>
> ... command (as root). Eve
Folks:
OK, ... I'm going a bit crazy, here. 8P
I'm using RH 7.2. I installed Webmin last night, from the
RPM. Using the ...
rpm -Uhv .rpm
... command (as root). Everything went well, and Webmin is
installed. NOW, when I try to install Courier (mail s
Folks:
OK, ... I'm going a bit crazy, here. 8P
I installed Webmin last night, from the RPM. Using the ...
rpm -Uhv .rpm
... command (as root). Everything went well, and Webmin is
installed. NOW, when I try to install Courier (MTA) that way, I'm
getti
;Ragnar Wiencke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 6:38 AM
Subject: Re: imap rpm's needed
> Hi Jay,
>
> >It's a huge program. Why not just use the UW imap that
> comes with
Hi Jay,
>It's a huge program. Why not just use the UW imap that
comes with
>RedHat? called imap-2001???.rpm or something like that.
That is a good question. I search for it on the CD's an on
Redhats website but didn't find anything. But now I found it
on the second CD of the set.
Thanks,
Ragna
On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 12:33:03PM +0100, Ragnar Wiencke wrote:
> Hi there guys.
>
> Aren't there any ready to use rpm's for the Cyrus imap
> server? I got a curus-imapd-2.1.5.tar.gz file and I am
> having huge problems trying to configur and compile them. At
&g
Hi there guys.
Aren't there any ready to use rpm's for the Cyrus imap
server? I got a curus-imapd-2.1.5.tar.gz file and I am
having huge problems trying to configur and compile them. At
least it seams huge to me :(
Tia,
Ragnar W.
___
R
It's working THANKS THANKS.Installing FreeS/Wan Redhat 7.3
1.) Download the RPM's
ftp://ftp.xs4all.nl/pub/crypto/freeswan/RedHat-RPMs
2.) Intstall the RPM's
a.)FreeS/Wan Module
b.)FreeS/Wan
3.)
echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
e subject matter. He overstates so many
>>things, it is more FUD than anything.
DT> I have my differences with the author's conclusions, to be sure. I'm
DT> not sure I'd place so much blame squarely on RPM's shoulders. I think
DT> it's fair to suggest that much o
sed, he should add he
> >has little knowledge of the subject matter. He overstates so many
> >things, it is more FUD than anything.
>
> I have my differences with the author's conclusions, to be sure. I'm
> not sure I'd place so much blame squarely on RPM's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 16 June 2002 02:14 pm, David Talkington wrote:
> The link came from slashdot, so the "damage" was obviously already
> done.
>
> If it were me, and I wasn't ready to go live, I wouldn't have put it on
> the air. ;-)
Oh, I agree. If you wan
s more FUD than anything.
I have my differences with the author's conclusions, to be sure. I'm
not sure I'd place so much blame squarely on RPM's shoulders. I think
it's fair to suggest that much of the difficulty discussed here is
merely a symptom of the fragmentation of
On Sun, Jun 16, 2002 at 10:40:08AM -0700, David Talkington wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> It's no secret that I'm not a fan of RPM. Here's an article explaining
> its problems in a broader context.
>
> http://distrowatch.colug.net/article-rpm.php
>
Wow, alo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Fratoni wrote:
>> http://distrowatch.colug.net/article-rpm.php
>I quote from the top of that page:
>"This article is currently under preparation. Please do not post links to
>it and do not submit it to any new sites. Thank you."
The link c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 16 June 2002 01:40 pm, David Talkington wrote:
> It's no secret that I'm not a fan of RPM. Here's an article explaining
> its problems in a broader context.
>
> http://distrowatch.colug.net/article-rpm.php
>
> Cheers -d
Bad David... ;)
I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
It's no secret that I'm not a fan of RPM. Here's an article explaining
its problems in a broader context.
http://distrowatch.colug.net/article-rpm.php
Cheers -d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5.8
Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.75-
You could just do 'up2date -u' and let the up2date program download and
install all the relevant RPMs for your system.
On Fri, 12 Apr 2002, Scott wrote:
> Greetings:
>
> I'm starting out with a fresh 7.1 box. I wanted to apply all the applicable
> updated rpms. I compared what was available
On Fri, 12 Apr 2002, Scott wrote:
> In particular I got dependency problems when I got to these:
>
> cpp-2.96-85.i386.rpm
> gcc-2.96-85.i386.rpm
> gcc-c++-2.96-85.i386.rpm
> libstdc++-2.96-85.i386.rpm
> libstdc++-devel-2.96-85.i386.rpm
>
> They seemed to depend on each other.
They do. Just u
On Fri, 12 Apr 2002 19:58:44 -0500
"Scott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> quietly intimated:
> Greetings:
>
> I'm starting out with a fresh 7.1 box. I wanted to apply all the
> applicable updated rpms. I compared what was available in
> ftp://updates.redhat.com/7.1/en/os/i386/ with what I had installed a
One thing I would suggest would be to just try using Red Hat's up2date
feature. It will (typically) upgrade and install packages in the proper
order and resolve any dependency issues you might have.
http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/RHNetwork/ref-guide/up2date-config.html
Michael
_
Greetings:
I'm starting out with a fresh 7.1 box. I wanted to apply all the applicable
updated rpms. I compared what was available in
ftp://updates.redhat.com/7.1/en/os/i386/ with what I had installed as shown
with rpm -qa
FIrst I just downloaded them and tried to install them in "ls" order.
Hello Thomas,
Monday, March 04, 2002, 2:58:30 PM, you textually orated:
BTG> Sounds good, but how do you update the release flag?
That may depend on the RPM (well technically it is always the same, but some
people do it differently).
The "standard" way is to simply change the line that looks l
Sounds good, but how do you update the release flag?
-Original Message-
From: Brian Ashe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 2:47 PM
To: Burke, Thomas G.
Subject: Re[2]: Upgrading recompiled source rpm's - how?
Hello Thomas,
Monday, March 04, 2002, 12:16:49 PM
Hello Thomas,
Monday, March 04, 2002, 12:16:49 PM, you textually orated:
BTG> On Mon, 2002-03-04 at 11:23, Ed Wilts wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 10:52:24AM -0500, Burke, Thomas G. wrote:
>> >
>> > I downloaded the .src.rpm files, did a "rpm --rebuild foo.src.rpm",
>> > and now have foo
Maybe I should have specified... I am using a 6.2 system.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 12:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: Upgrading recompiled source rpm's - how?
&
"Burke, Thomas G." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hey gang,
>
> I downloaded the .src.rpm files, did a "rpm --rebuild foo.src.rpm",
> and now have foo.rpm in my /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386 directory. How do I
> tell rpm to install/upgrade/freshen these files over the versions that are
> curr
March 04, 2002 11:52 AM
To: Redhat List
Subject: Re: Upgrading recompiled source rpm's - how?
On Mon, 2002-03-04 at 11:23, Ed Wilts wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 10:52:24AM -0500, Burke, Thomas G. wrote:
> >
> > I downloaded the .src.rpm files, did a "rpm --rebuild
On Mon, 2002-03-04 at 11:23, Ed Wilts wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 10:52:24AM -0500, Burke, Thomas G. wrote:
> >
> > I downloaded the .src.rpm files, did a "rpm --rebuild foo.src.rpm",
> > and now have foo.rpm in my /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386 directory. How do I
> > tell rpm to install/up
Upgrading recompiled source rpm's - how?
On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 10:52:24AM -0500, Burke, Thomas G. wrote:
>
> I downloaded the .src.rpm files, did a "rpm --rebuild foo.src.rpm",
> and now have foo.rpm in my /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386 directory. How do I
> tell rpm
On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 10:52:24AM -0500, Burke, Thomas G. wrote:
>
> I downloaded the .src.rpm files, did a "rpm --rebuild foo.src.rpm",
> and now have foo.rpm in my /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386 directory. How do I
> tell rpm to install/upgrade/freshen these files over the versions that are
Hey gang,
I downloaded the .src.rpm files, did a "rpm --rebuild foo.src.rpm",
and now have foo.rpm in my /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386 directory. How do I
tell rpm to install/upgrade/freshen these files over the versions that are
currently residing on my box? (i'm going from the standard 38
gregory mott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Charles Galpin wrote:
> >On Sat, 2002-02-23 at 18:16, gregory mott wrote:
> > > if i want to install a .rpm that has unsatisfied dependencies, and those
> > > packages in turn are all in the current directory, is there some
> > > straghtforward way to te
Charles Galpin wrote:
>On Sat, 2002-02-23 at 18:16, gregory mott wrote:
> > if i want to install a .rpm that has unsatisfied dependencies, and those
> > packages in turn are all in the current directory, is there some
> > straghtforward way to tell them to install themselves as necessary?
>
>up2da
On Sat, 2002-02-23 at 18:16, gregory mott wrote:
> if i want to install a .rpm that has unsatisfied dependencies, and those
> packages in turn are all in the current directory, is there some
> straghtforward way to tell them to install themselves as necessary?
up2date will do this, providing Re
if i want to install a .rpm that has unsatisfied dependencies, and those
packages in turn are all in the current directory, is there some
straghtforward way to tell them to install themselves as necessary?
and, same question if the packages are in a ftp directory.
___
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Tracker wrote:
> well it is installed, I just have to configure and it doesnt have the
> correct module or something like that to configure..here is what I got
>
> copy and paste doesnt work.. sorry
>
>
Can you please paste here more information? I'm particularly refer
Jesus Ortega (a.k.a. Nitebirdz) wrote:
>On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Tracker wrote:
>
>>well it is installed, I just have to configure and it doesnt have the
>>correct module or something like that to configure..here is what I got
>>
>>copy and paste doesnt work.. sorry
>>
>
>
>Are you getting the error
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Tracker wrote:
> well it is installed, I just have to configure and it doesnt have the
> correct module or something like that to configure..here is what I got
>
> copy and paste doesnt work.. sorry
>
Are you getting the error when running the vmware-config.pl script? W
Tracker wrote:
> Jesus Ortega (a.k.a. Nitebirdz) wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Tracker wrote:
>>
come someone direct me on how to install this vmware rpm please
>>
>>
>> What did you try? What problems are you running into? When I
>> installed it,
>> a simplre 'rpm -Uvh ' wor
Jesus Ortega (a.k.a. Nitebirdz) wrote:
>On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Tracker wrote:
>
>>>
>>>come someone direct me on how to install this vmware rpm please
>>>
>
>
>What did you try? What problems are you running into? When I installed it,
>a simplre 'rpm -Uvh ' worked fine.
>
>
>
well it is install
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Tracker wrote:
> >
> >
> >come someone direct me on how to install this vmware rpm please
> >
What did you try? What problems are you running into? When I installed it,
a simplre 'rpm -Uvh ' worked fine.
--
Nitebirdz
Mozilla--> http://www.mozilla.org
Linux XFS--> h
>
>
>come someone direct me on how to install this vmware rpm please
>
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
On Wed, 2002-01-16 at 12:23, Gregg Morris wrote:
> > "Bret" == Bret Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
> > I can at least get you the date in human readable format: try
> > %{installtime:date}
>
> > The man page is not real clear on this. I thought I actually
> > did wh
Yeah, I realize that. It was doing them all together and letting it work
out the dependencies that did it. I didn't know you could do that. I'm
actually using the -Fvh and it's working well.
James
At 03:53 PM 1/16/2002 +, you wrote:
>At 1/15/2002 10:26 PM -0500, you wrote:
>>I tried it as
At 1/15/2002 10:26 PM -0500, you wrote:
>I tried it as you suggested and it worked well. All of them in the
>directory and using the -Uvh instead of just -U. Thanks for your help and
>thanks to the others that responded to this post. Linux is a constant
>learning process.
James,
Note that "v"
1 - 100 of 186 matches
Mail list logo
