]
Subject: FW: adding users for ftp access
Thanks to those who attempted to respond to my query earlier
server os is linux redhat 6.1 (not 100% positive on this I used a uname
command but all I get is linux for a response) the ftp program is
proftpd
umm now to reiterate my question and maybe
some screen output of a sample FTP session would
help.
Thanks,
Andy.
-Original Message-
From: chris sherwood [mailto:csherwood@;nortialearning.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 7:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: FW: adding users for ftp access
Thanks to those who attempted to
however this doesnt grant that user ftp access.
now I realize that most linux newbies are probably rolling on the floor
laughing their asses off at me out there but I still need to do this.
I checked the passwd and shadow file in /etc/
and the userinfo is there however the user in the shadow file has
users with ftp access
Terribly sorry about that I was just pointing out I am not a systems
admin.
we are using redhat 6.1 I believe and proftpd
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:redhat-list-admin@;redhat.com]On Behalf Of Teodor Georgiev
Sent: November 14, 2002 8:04 PM
To
]
Subject: Re: adding users with ftp access
Ok Chris, you are programmer.
When you ask some question in a programming forum you must say what for
language do you use (C, Perl, Pascal and etc).
So, do the same and tell us what FTP server do you try to use :)
- Original Message -
From: "
ROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 7:51 PM
Subject: adding users with ftp access
> Hello all
>
> I am a really new user of Linux and mainly just a systems programmer.
>
> Heres my problem. I have to add a user that would have ftp access to a
> s
Hello all
I am a really new user of Linux and mainly just a systems programmer.
Heres my problem. I have to add a user that would have ftp access to a
specific directory.
I have used adduser and defined the directory and other pertinant info ie
username, password and
On Fri, 4 Oct 2002 07:19:28 +
Kalinga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How to create user, who has access permison ftp only? All the
> services such as telnet and ssh are not accessible by this user.
>
>
>
You can allow or deny FTP access to ips and users by entries in
On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 07:19:28AM +, Kalinga wrote:
> How to create user, who has access permison ftp only? All the services such
> as telnet and ssh are not accessible by this user.
Google is your friend. For a search string, use "ftponly shell". It
was the first result for me.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04-Oct-2002/07:19 +, Kalinga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>How to create user, who has access permison ftp only? All the services such
>as telnet and ssh are not accessible by this user.
Set their shell as /bin/false.
- --
Anthony E. Greene
How to create user, who has access permison ftp only? All the services such
as telnet and ssh are not accessible by this user.
Kshtrimayum V.
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
i hope this could help and not too late! just put this in wu-ftpd
restricted-uid *
cheers,
- Original Message -
From: "Ed Wilts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, July 13, 2002 3:19 AM
Subject: Re: restricting ftp access
> On Fri, J
ible and they had the land.
> - bishop Desmond Tutu
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 3:11 PM
> Subject: Re: restricting ftp access
>
> | I find proftpd is far easier to configure to cage users into their
> | directories. Also, it's a matter o
le and they had the land.
- bishop Desmond Tutu
- Original Message -
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 3:11 PM
Subject: Re: restricting ftp access
| I find proftpd is far easier to configure to cage users into their
| directories. Also, it's a matter of opinion but I believe it's
I find proftpd is far easier to configure to cage users into their
directories. Also, it's a matter of opinion but I believe it's more secure
than Wuftpd
On Friday 12 July 2002 12:19 pm, Ed Wilts wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 11:52:11AM -0700, daniel wrote:
> > you know how if you log into s
On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 11:52:11AM -0700, daniel wrote:
> you know how if you log into some sites with your ftp client, the machine
> puts you in "/home/username/" but as far as your client is concerned you're
> at "/"? how do you do that? does it have somthing to do with chroot? what
> is that
you know how if you log into some sites with your ftp client, the machine
puts you in "/home/username/" but as far as your client is concerned you're
at "/"? how do you do that? does it have somthing to do with chroot? what
is that? this is one of those questions i've had for a long time but n
I guess I have your answer.
Check /etc/ftpusers
remove root from the list as your user admin has root priv. with uid/gid
as 0/0
Any user in this list will be denied ftp access.
Regards,
Uk
Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
>
> Hi all!
>
> Excuse me for the "urge
Hello Pete and Icilio,
I finally solved the problem (I guess). I got rid of all the virtual servers
and set a symlink from /home/ftp to the appropriate anonymous directory.
What I still don't understand is how this could work before the upgrade,
without the symlink and with th
Hi Icilio,
> Read this:
> ftp://sunsite.cnlab-switch.ch/mirror/wu-ftpd/guest.HOWTO
>
> Buona notte.
The problem is I don't have time to read right now. I do read a lot, usually,
but I do need a quick fix urgently. Anyway, Pete seems to be helping me fine,
restoring the defaul
Hi Pete,
> pam-0.72-20
pam-0.72-6, but I guess that is allright for now.
> wu-ftpd-2.6.0-14.6x
That's the one I upgraded, so got that one now. But why did things stop
working???
/etc/pam.d/ftp is the same as yours, the original.
> ftp stream tcp nowait root/
> Hi Icilio,
>
>> > > cp -pr /var/ftp/bin .
>> > > cp -pr /var/ftp/etc .
>> > > cp -pr /var/ftp/lib .
>> >
>> > I have no such files.
>
>> Just cp -pr the dirs: bin etc lib, from the anonymous ftp area to /home
>>
>> Then modify the login path of any guest ftp user to be:
Hi Icilio,
> > > cp -pr /var/ftp/bin .
> > > cp -pr /var/ftp/etc .
> > > cp -pr /var/ftp/lib .
> >
> > I have no such files.
> Just cp -pr the dirs: bin etc lib, from the anonymous ftp area to /home
>
> Then modify the login path of any guest ftp user to be: /home/./guest
>
> Hi Icilio,
>
> > cp -pr /var/ftp/bin .
> > cp -pr /var/ftp/etc .
> > cp -pr /var/ftp/lib .
>
> I have no such files. And I am getting so stressed out that I can't think
>straight. I feel I screwed up big time (although the only thing I did was "rpm
>-U wu-ftpd##" (on a running
Hi Icilio,
> cp -pr /var/ftp/bin .
> cp -pr /var/ftp/etc .
> cp -pr /var/ftp/lib .
I have no such files. And I am getting so stressed out that I can't think
straight. I feel I screwed up big time (although the only thing I did was "rpm
-U wu-ftpd##" (on a running server that i
Hi Pete,
> You didn't mention error messages on your screen or indications in
> /var/log/{secure,messages,xferlog} messages.
No error messages on the screen, except for "530: Login incorrect".
When login in from remote as admin (is an alias for root) I get the error:
PAM_pwdb[4
> Hi Heman,
>
>> how does their user account look in /etc/passwd?
>>
>> example:
>>
> > user1:x:500:500:FTP User Account:/home/user1:/bin/false
>
> Nope, regular users ie
>
>admin:x:0:0:Administrator:/opt/usr/admin:/bin/bash
>
>and
>
>leonard:x:517:517::/home/leonard:/bin/bash
>
-978-589-7007 (Main GenRad FAX)
> From: "Leonard den Ottolander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2001 19:07:17 +0100
> Subject: FTP access; urgent
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Hi all!
>
> Excuse me for the
Hi Heman,
> how does their user account look in /etc/passwd?
>
> example:
>
> user1:x:500:500:FTP User Account:/home/user1:/bin/false
Nope, regular users ie
admin:x:0:0:Administrator:/opt/usr/admin:/bin/bash
and
leonard:x:517:517::/home/leonard:/bin/bash
And both admin
anuary 25, 2001 10:07 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: FTP access; urgent
>
>
> Hi all!
>
> Excuse me for the "urgent" in the header, but...
> I did an upgrade of wu-ftpd on a RH 6.2 server this
> afternoon, but
Hi all!
Excuse me for the "urgent" in the header, but...
I did an upgrade of wu-ftpd on a RH 6.2 server this afternoon, but after the
upgrade users were unable to login to the ftp server with their usernames.
Anonymous ftp using the ftp user still works, but people need to log
Hello,
I just take a look on /var/log/messages and /var/log/xferlog, and found that
the login/logout, transfer logs for the anonymous and guest users got the
incorrect time, it show GMT+0. But the real users ftp logs got correct time,
which is GMT+8.
Would anyone help me to solve the problem?
T
On Sun, 3 Sep 2000, John Aldrich wrote:
> Install telnet-server (bad idea, but you can if you want!
> ) and an ftp server such as wu-ftp, or ncftpd.
> John
>
Yes, and if this computer is going to be directly
connected to the internet, you should see about
replacing telnet with 'ssh' www.op
On Sat, 02 Sep 2000, Eileen Orbell wrote:
> Hi,
> I still am unable to Telnet - FTP into my Linux Box. I have noticed this
> error on bootup in my message log:
>
> gpm[540] Error in Protocol
>
> My inetd.conf has not been changed and FTP telnet is enabled. I can however
> telnet - ftp to other
Has your /etc/hosts.deny changed since the upgrade ? Take a look, there
are a few clues you might find in there to help you resolve the issue.
> Hi,
> I still am unable to Telnet - FTP into my Linux Box. I have noticed this
> error on bootup in my message log:
>
> gpm[540] Error in Protocol
>
gpm is the mouse services.
On Sat, 2 Sep 2000, Eileen Orbell wrote:
> Hi,
> I still am unable to Telnet - FTP into my Linux Box. I have noticed this
> error on bootup in my message log:
>
> gpm[540] Error in Protocol
>
> My inetd.conf has not been changed and FTP telnet is enabled. I can how
Hi,
I still am unable to Telnet - FTP into my Linux Box. I have noticed this
error on bootup in my message log:
gpm[540] Error in Protocol
My inetd.conf has not been changed and FTP telnet is enabled. I can however
telnet - ftp to other servers. If I telnet localhost I get error message
"Conn
d users to this group, then mod your FTP access
file to have something like this
==
compressyes all
tar yes all
chmod no anonymous
delete no anonymous
overwrite no a
I was just looking to see if there was a way to restrict normal users
from leaving their home directory, and I couldn't find one. Does anyone
know if this can be done without removing directory permissions on
everything:)
thanks...
___
Redhat-li
On Tue, 28 Mar 2000, Thomas Ribbrock (Design/DEG) wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 02:15:09PM -0500, Virtual Angel wrote:
> > Sigs are indicated by "-- " at the beginning of a line.
>
> If only they were. There are still too many mailprograms out there not
> enforcing this Netiquette standard an
On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 02:15:09PM -0500, Virtual Angel wrote:
[...]
> Sigs are indicated by "-- " at the beginning of a line.
[...]
If only they were. There are still too many mailprograms out there not
enforcing this Netiquette standard and many people simply don't know
what the "-- " stands fo
On Thu, 9 Mar 2000, rpjday wrote:
> so it's not just the length that's getting irritating. is there
> some sort of grassroots movement i can start to get people to
> smarten up with their sigs? just curious. sigh.
Yes. Set your mail software to remove (or not display) sigs. Sigs are
indica
> Darren Line wrote:
>
> Your apology is accepted.
> The reason why we need that on is because my company works in the
> Financial business and sometimes confidential information about our
> clients financial status and holdings is sent via email - hence the
> need for that (unfortunately) long d
On 09-Mar-2000 Rob Saul wrote:
>
> Hi Manuel,
>
>> I am not refusing the idea about long signatures, as I consider them
>> interesting and totally understandable, but, if someone wants to sign half a
>> page long because it makes him happy, that is not hurting me -or anyone
>> else- in anyway
> had to pay by the byte for her email.
Oh, sorry, I did not knew this billing modality existed somewhere.
-Manuel.
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.
Hi Manuel,
> I am not refusing the idea about long signatures, as I consider them
> interesting and totally understandable, but, if someone wants to sign half a
> page long because it makes him happy, that is not hurting me -or anyone
> else- in anyway
Not necessarily. A friend of mine was on
Hi Charles!
Well, "Manuel" is my name and "Charles" is yours, and I feel pretty much
better knowing I am writting to "Charles". But my point is, what can you
expect from someone that calls himself "Jack the Ripper" and signs "JtR"?
I am not refusing the idea about long signatures, as I consider
Now I'm confused Manuel
According to your satements below, you and I are both insecure and not
will to support our ideas.
Yet here you are supporting your ideas, and my idea is - well - that sigs
are a waste of time on a public mailing list - and supporting it daily
too!
still confused.
On
> so it's not just the length that's getting irritating. is there
> some sort of grassroots movement i can start to get people to
> smarten up with their sigs? just curious. sigh.
Well, I guess it is just a matter of taste. For instance, I believe that
someone who is not able to sign with his
Title: RE: FTP access FLAME
Your apology is accepted.
The reason why we need that on is because my company works in the Financial business and sometimes confidential information about our clients financial status and holdings is sent via email - hence the need for that (unfortunately) long
That is some scary stuff! I thought the US gov was scary.
Bret
Juha Saarinen wrote:
>
> %-> I think England has some law about email about they have to put
> %-> a signature of
> %-> legal crap in each and every email messageblame the
> %-> government of England.
> %-> Should we start anot
ok, so the original poster, made it clear that that
aggravating sig was, in fact, forced on him by his company.
mea culpa, mea maxima culpa. it was just one of those
days when i had one nerve left, and that signature got on it.
sigh.
rday
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
On Tue, 7 Mar 2000, Eric Cifreo wrote:
>
>
> >
> > On Mon, 6 Mar 2000, Darren Line wrote:
> >
> > ... body of message snipped ...
> >
> > > **
> > > The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and
> > >
> >
> >
>
Title: RE: FTP access FLAME
Sorry m8, can't do anything about it.
All emails that leave this company AUTOMATICALLY get the signature added.
Its called MailSweeper, and it also virus checks incoming & outgoing emails too.
And by LAW UK companies must include it as well.
%-> I think England has some law about email about they have to put
%-> a signature of
%-> legal crap in each and every email messageblame the
%-> government of England.
%-> Should we start another Boston Tea Party? What should we call this one?
Things are worse than you think in Old Blighty
I think England has some law about email about they have to put a signature of
legal crap in each and every email messageblame the government of England.
Should we start another Boston Tea Party? What should we call this one?
anyway about those gnome-list gtk-list...I'm subscribe to a few an
>
> On Mon, 6 Mar 2000, Darren Line wrote:
>
> ... body of message snipped ...
>
> > **
> > The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and
> > may be legally privileged. It is intended only for the addressee
> > an
At 09:48 AM 3/6/00 , Darren Line wrote:
After I did, I decided to verify
them. Anon was ok but NetKit b came up with an error
md5, file size, modification time.
I replied to your previous message... I don't know what is wrong with your netkit-base package but since ftpd is controlled by inet
At 06:39 AM 3/6/00 , Darren Line wrote:
How long should it take to log in
anonymously?
Not long. I suppose there are other possibilities but unless you have a
*really* slow (or overburdened) machine, latencies in networked services
seem to come from elements timing out. For example, if DNS is
Title: RE: FTP access
If it is doing reverse lookups, how do I stop it? Or if it should do reverse lookups, what do I need to do on the client end?
-Original Message-
From: Duncan Hill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 06 March 2000 19:44
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subjec
On Mon, 6 Mar 2000, Darren Line wrote:
... body of message snipped ...
> **
> The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and
> may be legally privileged. It is intended only for the addressee
> and others authori
On Mon, Mar 06, 2000 at 03:48:40PM -, Darren Line wrote:
[snip]
> Is this the reason why it takes SO long to connect anonymously???
>
> I am not connecting over the internet, it is just on our LAN, so logging in
> should be almost instantaneous.
>
> Help plz.
I haven't been paying att
> After uninstalling it, reinstalling and verifying it still comes up
> with this error.
>
> Is this the reason why it takes SO long to connect anonymously???
>
> I am not connecting over the internet, it is just on our LAN, so
> logging in should be almost instantaneous.
I'd say mo
On Mon, 6 Mar 2000, Darren Line wrote:
> Is this the reason why it takes SO long to connect anonymously???
Is it the actual connection that takes time, or the login as
anonymous? If its the actual connection, your machine is trying to do
reverse lookups on the IPs connecting to it, and prob
Title: RE: FTP access
I seem to have problem with NetKit B.
I have been following a guide to setup FTP Access (and not having much luck as it happens)
I decided to remove anonftp and netkit b and reinstall them.
After I did, I decided to verify them. Anon was ok but NetKit b came up
Title: FTP access
How long should it take to log in anonymously?
I have installed (redhat 6.1) anonftp but have not edited any of the ftpaccess etc files (yet).
It seems to take forever to display any of directories/files on the server.
What editor should I use to edit those files? and
Hi !
Thank you very much for your reply ! and you are not an asshole ! ;)
>> 1.) What do I have to do to be able to access the mounted vfat partition
>>when i ftp to my server ?
>
>Configure your permissions to allow browsing to that mount point. man ftpd.
>It works as you would ex
> Now my questions:
>
> 1.) What do I have to do to be able to access the mounted vfat partition
>when i ftp to my server ?
Configure your permissions to allow browsing to that mount point. man ftpd.
It works as you would expect: if the user you log in as has rights to
read/write to the mount p
Hi !
I'd like to exchange files between W98 and Linux residing on the system. I
have no problem to mount vfat partitions under Linux. I have a
non-anonymous ftp server running (proftpd, mainly to access my documents
via ftp), now i want to link a mounted vfat partition to the ftp-director
How can I prevent the users that login their account with ftp not to
go other directories (such as /etc /bin vs) except their home directory...
I want the ftp users not to go out from their home directories...
Umut...
Hi,
Does anyone know of an FTP archive of the hurricane mailing list? I
would like to FTP a number of files.
Please note that I really am looking for FTP access and not access
through a web interface or an mail archive retrieval program.
Thanks.
--
Eze Ogwuma
--
PLEASE read the Red
71 matches
Mail list logo
