--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, "wb6ymh" wrote:
>
> Bob, you might consider picking up a rubidium frequency standard, they
> are <$100 on ebay. In fact there's a $77 buy it now listing
> with free shipping at the moment:
> http://cgi.ebay.com/10MHZ-EF
Domain_0?hash=item3ef7a2e7af&_trksid=p3286.c0.m14
You'll need a heatsink and a 24 volts power supply. A GPS locked
standard would be ultimate, but they are more like $300.
73's Skip WB6YMH
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, n...@... wrote:
>
> At 9/5/2009 21:20, you wr
ter's transmitter I'd use a plain pass cavity
rather than a pass-reject to get better selectivity.
If a pass-reject is needed for the repeater's transmitter you
really need to upgrade the duplexer.
73's Skip WB6YMH
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, "k2aau" wrote:
it or carry a copy!
GREAT! Now get them to give you that in writing and you and
everyone else is good to go. Unfortunately that's not likely
to happen, but you never know if you don't ask.
73's Skip WB6YMH
power will end up in the
isolators load so plan accordingly.
So no isolator between the exciter and the PA does no good at all
in preventing intermod.
73's Skip WB6YMH
ters to it if you like or use point
to point links. Repeaters connected via the conference can still
operate full duplex. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/thelinkbox/
73's Skip WB6YMH
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, "wa5jxy" wrote:
>
> OK, I have searched the ROIP post
an Yahoo group of 8924c owners you might want to join:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/hp8924 .
73's Skip WB6YMH
Are you feeling nostalgic for a vintage service monitor? If so I may
have just the thing for you. A working Cushman CE5 with dev scope
and tunable VHF preselector. Also included are the front cover,
antenna, output pad, service manual on CD and original hardcopy manual
for the CRT plugin.
Sev
terested please join http://groups.yahoo.com/group/thelinkbox .
73's Skip WB6YMH
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, "Ethercrash" wrote:
>
> My repeater group is considering building split-site 6m machine. As an
> inter-site link, I was thinking of using some sort of VOIP arrangemen
boards work. Maybe a little dirty for CTCSS
work, but
> cheap.
But in this case he just uses one output bit into a single pole low
pass filter. Still cute, but for $39 from Greece, no thanks.
73's Skip WB6YMH
amming???
>
> You are using a cannon to kill a microbe he he he
It's also an VoIP interface, i.e. EchoLink/IRLP. Why? Because it's
fun. It's a hobby, remember? I built a microcontroller (Z80) based
in the 70's ... been there, done that.
73's Skip WB6YMH
ports any sound device
that's supported by Linux. It's still in open Beta, but it has been in
24/7 operation in several locations for over a year.
73's Skip WB6YMH
290 all positive feedbacks and has had his ebay account since 99 ?
I'd give the guy the benefit of the doubt and send him another email
or try to find his telephone number. Emails do get lost. People do
go on vacation.
Good luck!
73's Skip WB6YMH
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoo
5
and she has plenty of money to finance her campaign:
http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5jHEcseFzxUxohpaDwVv-c1phEsTQD90B5ITO0
73's Skip WB6YMH
It
may be obsolete just like the real Doug Hall box, I don't think Vertex
makes the radio it plugged into any longer.
Note: Several of the bands (1200, 900) are Pacific Research extensions
to the protocol. I've never seen a real Doug Hall box.
73's Skip WB6YMH
>
89.9Hz 47 = 196.6Hz 48 = 199.5Hz 49 = 206.5Hz 50 = 229.1Hz
Data is clocked in on falling edge of clock
--*/
73's Skip WB6YMH
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/xcat/
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/thelinkbox/
the VCO.
73's Skip WB6YMH
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, "Thomas Oliver"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Yes it is doable I have several on the air right now very little trouble
> since installation just keep fans on them if using for TX. I have one
>
http://www.palisadesarc.com/downloads/ChroniclesPDF/
I have quite a few copies of FM Mag and a few RPT mags you are welcome
to borrow for scanning. Unfortunately I don't have a scanner.
73's Skip WB6YMH
>
> If anybody is in the Chatham Michigan area, wouldn't mind doing
> a phone book lookup, and contact Mike please invite him to this
> mailing list. Or at lease get a mailing address for him.
>
> Mike WA6ILQ
>
ted a Yahoo group for thelinkbox @
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/thelinkbox/ for discussions about the
project and to avoid polluting this list with off topic discussions.
73's Skip WB6YMH
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
m
ragchews and some are. There's no need to abandon a band (or mode),
just because one repeater (reflector) isn't friendly to your
interests. Just find a place that is.
73's Skip WB6YMH
a ton for
shipping so it's a case of you get what you pay for. I bought a total
of 4 Mitreks (two shipments of two to the unpadded box) and 3 of the 4
worked perfectly, one had a deaf receiver. No shipping damage which is
a testament to mother Motorola of 25 years ago.
73's Skip WB6YMH
, but he would mail eggs in
an envelope! Luckily I bought Mitreks from him which are rectangular
and hard to break. The postperson dropped the unpadded cardboard box
on my concrete front porch before I could get to the door, maybe
that's where that crack same from.
73's Skip WB6YMH
#x27;t limited to autopatches "back in the day". I
had several full duplex conversations with *two* other RF users that
were full duplex. One person transmitted on 440, another on 2 meters
and the third was on 6 meters. All three receivers were mixed onto
our 440 talkback that were we
istor and got 10 watts out with about 2 amps in. In that
configuration it just barely gets warm. Since the Micor amp only
requires about a watt drive I have the power output turned all the way
down.
73's Skip WB6YMH
I passed this on to a friend and he doesn't believe it. Could you
tell me where you read about it? Thanks! (he's in the backup power
supply business so he got excited!)
73's Skip WB6YMH
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, "Tony L."
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
n digital and analog was tried back in the packet
days... to say the least it didn't work.
73's Skip WB6YMH
out frequency coordination, but I
feel a tad bit better.
73's Skip WB6YMH
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, "Steve S. Bosshard (NU5D)"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> "Illegal is Illegal" period.
>
> Look at what there is to gain by promoting dig
Working Micor power supply. I replaced it with a switcher to free
some rack space and eliminate the ferroresonant transformer heat and
buzz. Pickup only, Palos Verdes, Ca. (Los Angeles area). Sorry I'm
not willing to ship it or I'd sell it on ebay.
73's Skip WB6YMH
you threw out your tube
stock recently) go to ebay and search for a 12ax7. For example
http://cgi.ebay.com/Matched-New-Pair-of-Rare-Philips-mC-12AX7-Tubes_W0QQitemZ330162061283QQihZ014QQcategoryZ50598QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
I sure hope he packs them well!
73's Skip WB6YMH
ve a pointer to a bunch of people that
do here: http://www.echolink.org/interfaces.htm.
I've used the VA3TO board and have been very happy with it, but since
he no longer accepts paypal buying one from the US is a bit more of a
hassle that it use to be.
73's Skip WB6YMH
I also thought it would be fun to play with... Google is your friend:
http://www.qsl.net/kd2bd/splat.html
73's Skip WB6YMH
ut I worked with an ex-military Vietnam
era radio tech who had many colorful stories.
73's Skip WB6YMH
I said "weak signals", I should have said "phase distorted and weak
signals". My path to a local repeater is phase distorted at times and
it seemed to effect DCS, but not CTCSS. When it gets bad I squelch
out on voice peaks, so it's not a very usable signal in any case.
the category of "Glad I asked!".
73's Skip WB6YMH
something?
I've only played with DCS briefly, I'm no expert. I never had cross
manufacture compatibility problems with CTCSS, but it seems non
Motorola radios won't decode some DCS codes that Motorola will.
73's Skip WB6YMH
Do you really need to encode your "normal" tone when user is not
talking? Seems like it would be way simpler and goof proof to use a
single tone for both purposes. If your user wants to hear the ID,
function tones or whatever he could just listen in carrier squelch.
73's Ski
in place because the
repeater regulations were being rewritten at the time. I think the
FCC had finally gotten tired of looking at the stick figure drawings
of controller operators with their hands on the "big red switch".
73's Skip WB6YMH
And it's been that way for at least 2 months... Our radio use to be
in that building, I'm glad we're not there any more!
Skip WB6YMH
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, "sgreact47" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Subject: I think this tower has a
y might turn PL on! (And be damn
happy you knew the command code since it was the same one your local
machine uses).
73's Skip WB6YMH
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Nate Duehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On May 18, 2007, at 12:27 AM, wb6ymh wrote:
>
> > Your earlier messages struck me as "my favorite controller doesn't
> > support site prefixing so site prefixing must be
rather a fairly standard way
things have been done for literally decades.
I for one think this subject has been beaten to death and then
some.
73's Skip WB6YMH
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, "Nate Duehr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > <---
Tony beat me to it! I didn't even know Bill had changed his call
again! I guess should listen to Westlink (cough) Newsline more often.
73's Skip WB6YMH
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, "tony dinkel"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Ken
> >(Hell,
Arcom's new RC810 supports site prefixing. I wonder if that has
anything to do with the fact that Ken is originally from Southern
California (grin)?
73's Skip WB6YMH
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Ed Yoho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Nate Duehr wrote:
>
>
oIP is integrated. Is it going
to be compatible with IRLP, EchoLink, WiresII, eQSO, Asterisk, IAX,
SIP, H323, All Star, or will it be another proprietary system?
73's Skip WB6YMH
While you're at it ... I can no longer find any of the accessories
like the RLC-MOT Micor squelch card on the WEB site. I hope you still
make it!
73's Skip WB6YMH
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Allan Overcast
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The prices are available
Xs are fairly scarce.
If you hear something on a Syntor the chances are it's really there
and not a figment of the receivers imagination.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/xcat
73's Skip WB6YMH
cables. They appear fairly frequently
on ebay but often without cables. All I really wanted was the meter,
I'm tired of tuning up radios with a DVM!
73's Skip WB6YMH
m
assuming the peaking generator is jumpered to the deviation panel for
use as a local oscillator. Did I guess right, do I get a fish biscuit?
73's Skip WB6YMH
4JJA6105E1.
Thanks & 73's Skip WB6YMH
easu. I
don't need the code plug themselfs, only the data pattern
generated. If you have the equipment but don't have a code plug
I'll give you one.
Thanks & 73's Skip WB6YMH
p.s. I apologize for cross posting, the other lists I posted this
message to have very low traffic, but are specific to the Syntor
audience.
them in? The copyright has to be expired by now and the copyright
owner has been out of business for 30+ years.
I have in fact googled for the Chronicles, but the only thing I
found was an old usenet posting by Brian WB6CYT.
73's Skip WB6YMH
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, "
vious
isn't it? No need for a bunch of hex codes to key in for weird
modes or anything, right?
73's Skip WB6YMH
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Neil McKie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Uh oh ...
>
> When you are looking for a manual, you need to pay se
wnee running into a
dummy load which was the "signal generator" it replaced.
By the way I still have the model 80 ... and the Bird 43 we bought
at the same time. Amazingly enough I haven't had an urge to replace
the Bird!
73's Skip WB6YMH
Yahoo! Groups Links
elling it has a manual, but he wasn't selling the
manual.
73's Skip WB6YMH
>
> wb6ymh wrote:
> >
> > I just bought a CE-5 on ebay for $205.46, the last one from the
same
> > guy when for $199. He has yet another one up for auction now.
In
> > the pictu
t's
replacing (grin).
73's Skip WB6YMH
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Bob Dengler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> At 12/13/2004 08:23 AM, you wrote:
>
> >I bought a CE-31A on e-Bay for $225, then saw one go
at "Deerchester" for
> >$125 (sob !!).
CE-3, they are not small or light. I also don't want
to admit how many times I rebuild the attenuator pad!
I saw an IFR 1100A go for $500 just before I started looking, that
strikes me as a much better deal. More recent IFRs have been going
for 1k+. YMMV.
73's Skip WB6YMH
--- In R
quot;?
>
> Lastly without getting into Part 97 to much is "DCS"
> or "DPL" authorized for use in the ham spectrum for
> repeater use?
Sure, why not? It's not like it's encryption or something. You
don't need authorization to have 60 cycle power s
e is your friend.
73's Skip WB6YMH
>
> Mathew
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Mike WA6ILQ" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Saturday, November 20, 2004 3:16 PM
> Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Question for the list...
>
>
> >
> &
t the keypad I'd take a whack it
fixing it myself.
The keypad on my 20+ year old Yeasu 708 still works, but the rest of
the radio is useless because of it's 25Khz channel spacing. (440 is
now on 20Khz channel spacing in So. Cal)
73's Skip WB6YMH
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups
http://groups.yahoo.com/groups/xcat .
73's Skip WB6YMH
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of
10-33, 10-44 ? Your calendar appears to be different revision than
mine :)
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, "Mr. Edgar McKinney"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What about the rest of the "Ten" codes? Like 10-7 or 10-33, or
> 10-41...
>
> Neil McKie wrote:
>
> > Happy 10-4 day eve
r for "security". Ah the feeling of power when you
munched down on .94 and heard the 140D's dynamotor wind up!
I also remember something about a locking gas cap ...
73's Skip WB6YMH
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Neil McKie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
&
ell, we're probably boring the list to tears by now so I'll go
back into a "lurking" mode.
73's Skip WB6YMH
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Ken Arck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 04:36 PM 9/20/2004 -, you wrote:
> >
> >Unfair, you'v
gle the control system in wasn't something I thought
about (not for very long anyway!).
73's Skip WB6YMH
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, "Rogers, Ron"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I built the first micro-processor controlled repeater (what was
believed to b
as your call in the "good old" days? What was
the remote call? That'll probably jog the memory record from "off
line storage" !
73's Skip WB6YMH
> Indeed, the 70's were a very cool time in ham "repeaterdom". Ahhh,
how I
> miss the days of the
) it'll be back on the air.
73's WB6YMH
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Ken Arck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi folks
>
> Is anyone aware of the earliest use of a synthesized remote base
on an
> amateur repeater? One that allowed full frequency agility?
>
&
uot;fully frequency agile" definition as
the 22s only covered the top 2 Mhz of the band.
73's Skip WB6YMH
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Ken Arck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi folks
>
> Is anyone aware of the earliest use of a synthesized remote base
on a
, not the TS-64. Comparing the schematics leads me to believe
the mod doesn't apply to the TS-64 at all. The TS-64 is a micro
based design, the TS-32 is a discrete design.
73's Skip WB6YMH
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.y
io has a lot of low
frequency
> noise that was causing the decoder to delay the decode about
400mS. After
> the filter was used in took less than 100mS to decode.
>
> I have not had a single problem after doing that.
>
> Charles Miller.
Sorry, I don't follow. You had to
emember, it takes longer for the decoder to recognize
the longer
> > sine-wave. Frequency & time.. If you want faster, try a higher
frequency
> > tone. (Seems like 203.5 Hz is about three times 67 Hz, and it
should decode
> > in about a third of the time.)
> >
&
'll double check
with a scope. Thanks for the tip, I never thought about that
possibility.
73's Skip WB6YMH
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Eric Lemmon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Skip,
>
> Check to be certain that your discriminator audio tapoff point
does no
off. The input is right off the Micor's
discriminator. Is this normal or do I have a problem? It's
certainly an effective kurchunk filter!
73's Skip WB6YMH
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Bu
72 matches
Mail list logo
