On 30 Nov 2001, Randy Kramer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am not sure which end the 100 bytes per file applies to, and I guess
that is the RAM memory footprint?. Does rsync need 100 bytes for each
file that might be transferred during a session (all files in the
specified directory(ies)), or
I'm starting to think we need to not show all the options in the
default --help output. I think perhaps the default should be to show
the commonly-used options (-avz, --include, : vs ::) and then have
--help-options and so on for more details. It is getting quite
ridiculous. There's one or two
On 28 Nov 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all
I have been watching and learning from this list for a couple of months
now.. Here is my first question.
If rsync comes across a file that is in use by somebody. What happens?
Does the file get skipped or does the entire transfer halt?
On 1 Dec 2001, Phil Howard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There does not seem to be an option in configure to get rsync 2.5.0
to link libz as a shared library. Is there any way to do this?
rsync uses a modified version of libz, so it can't be statically
linked. See zlib/README.rsync
--
Martin
On 27 Nov 2001, Dave Dykstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can reproduce it, and I think you've stumbled on a significant bug. The
problem is that rsync always assumes stat variable st_rdev, which
contains both the major and minor number, is always 4 bytes and is always
the same format on both
On 1 Dec 2001, Phil Howard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any other suggestions for reducing the size? It's gone beyond 500K
already, and I'm trying to get this thing into a floppy rescue system.
Make sure it's dynamically linked to lpopt and getaddrinfo, then strip
it. That makes it just 160k
On 29 Nov 2001, Jeremy Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Linux.
By the way when reporting bugs like this it is good to give a more
specific description, like RedHat 7.1 on x86.
Other files are ok, even files that are simular in size, I have a
700meg file that seems ok.
I'm aware of the
On 29 Nov 2001, Jeremy Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry. This is a Red Hat 6.2 machine. 2.2.19 kernel. Both ends are the
same.
OK, thanks.
unexpected EOF in read_timeout
That error often means the ssh connection is failing.
The server is running rsyncd and client
On 29 Nov 2001, Dave Madole [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It also seems that at one point rsync wasn't recognizing that two of the
800M files were actually hard linked together, although in the same run it
did fine with smaller files (of the same name in different directories).
That's an
On 29 Nov 2001, Ian Kettleborough [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. How much memory does each file to be copied need. Obvisiouly I have too many
files.
Hard to say exactly. On the order of a hundred bytes per file.
2. Why does this command work:
rsync -ax /usr/xx /backup/usr/
On 28 Nov 2001, Dave Dykstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 04:03:58PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
rsync -avu --include 'tmp1/*/*.c' --include */ --exclude * tmp1 tmp2
The above command copies all the empty directories under tmp1/ . Is there
any way to avoid it?
Any votes for/against?
- Forwarded message from Rik Faith [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 12:55:29 -0500
From: Rik Faith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: rsync patch
X-Mailer: VM 6.96; XEmacs 21.1; Linux 2.4.16 (light)
Here is a patch that adds rate
sun/amdahl/unixware patch
All these are applied now. I changed the library routines to just
include rsync.h
--
Martin
On 28 Nov 2001, Dave Dykstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The HP compiler needs a -Ae to accept ANSI.
Sadly the compiler on this machine reports:
configure:5002: cc -c -Ae -DHAVE_CONFIG_H conftest.c 5
(Bundled) cc: warning 480: The -A option is available only with the C/ANSI C product;
ignored.
On 27 Nov 2001, Dave Dykstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unfortunately there is no way to search the archive. That would be very
useful.
Just use google and say
site:lists.samba.org rsync mbp prototype
or whatever.
--
Martin
On 27 Nov 2001, Dave Dykstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2.4.7 isn't released yet. Martin has put a lot of changes in the last week
into CVS, and when I tried it yesterday it didn't compile anywhere but
Linux. Today it looks a bit better but I still have problems on all my
platforms except
On 26 Nov 2001, Andrew J. Schorr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I understand your point of view, but I think it is a mistake to
hold rsync's algorithm hostage to the directory tree traversal logic
built into the program.
IMHO, the basic file transfer algorithm of rsync is terrific, but
the
On 23 Nov 2001, Andre Pang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 03:05:32PM -0800, Jos Backus wrote:
How about adding a --no-detach option (to be used in combination with
supervise? If there's interest I'll provide a patch.
Yes, this is great. I wanted it today when trying to
Actually, right now I'm just a rej on main.c
cali:/usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/rsync-2.4.6# patch -p0
../rsync-ssh-over-daemon.patch
patching file `authenticate.c'
patching file `clientserver.c'
patching file `main.c'
Hunk #2 FAILED at 166.
Hunk #8 FAILED at 763.
2 out of 8 hunks FAILED
On 25 Nov 2001, Jeremy Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can someone tell me why this, and other patches on the list are failing
for me. I have a feeling I'm applying these diffs incorrectly for some
reason.
What error do you get when you try to apply them?
You probably want something
On 20 Nov 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is a bit less than obvious... It can be sure about its own kBps, but
wire protocols may vary... 100Mbps of ethernet is not 100/16 ofr 16Mbps
token ring is not 100/1.044 of T1 is not ...whatever rsh,, ssh, and
rsync transport protocols vary
On 19 Nov 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone noticed that the --bwlimit doesn't really work?
I have MRTG stats happening, and on a 128Kbps circuit, an rsync
with the following syntax takes up the whole line.
$ rsync -avz -e ssh localfiles.tar.gz user@remote:/path/to/file/arch
On 25 Oct 2001, taisaki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good evening
Hello!
I use d as follows.
(It is every 5 minutes from Cron)
#!/bin/sh
LOCK=/tmp/lock.pid
if [ ! -e $LOCK ]; then
echo 1 $LOCK
rsync -ave ssh --delete /export/mirror user@hostB:/export
rsync -ave ssh
On 12 Oct 2001, Dave Dykstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Oct 12, 2001 at 03:56:27PM +0100, Feroz F. Basir wrote:
Hi again,
can you upload the rsync binary for ncr mp ras svr4
unix system, please? can you upload at :
http://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/binaries/
Uh oh, I
i didn't see that there was a way to tell rsync to change ownership and
group assignment on all files transferred to a specific user. meaning
transfer all these files to this remote machine and then chown them to
'doug', no matter who owns them here on the local machine.
i need this, so i
On 5 Oct 2001, Sanjeev Jha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
checking whether the C compiler (/usr/local/bin/gcc -O -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE
-D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 ) works... no
configure: error: installation or configuration problem: C compiler cannot create
executables.
Any solution of this ?
On 22 Sep 2001, Ralph Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am using Rsync to mirror my primary drive to a mounted second
drive. I am using a crontab to control it:
30 3 * * * /usr/bin/rsync -rpogl /* /mnt/backup2/systemBackup/
The first run seems fine. But the subsequent running seems to
On 16 Sep 2001, Danny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have serveral servers with different versions of Redhat, does the same
version of rsync need to be on each server ?
No, it just has to not be ridiculously old. Anything from the last
three years or so will interoperate.
If so what it the
On 12 Sep 2001, Michelene Chon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We are using rsync and have noticed that it fails to copy hidden
directories. I looked through the doc and it doesn't look like there's a
flag to get rsync to not skip hidden (dot) directories. Am I missing
something or is this By
On 13 Sep 2001, Andy Goth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll avoid simultaneous changes, then, by remembering (or automating) updates
before switching computers. I could probably do this pretty easily as some
sort of an eth0-up script.
On the other hand, if only one system changes at a time
On 18 Jul 2001, Sudarshan Ramaswamy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
In continuation of my Problem . I found out the following
upon issuing the command ldd i find that libraries were different on
diferent machines because of the different Operating System versions.
rsync to the workstation of
On 12 Jul 2001, Obergehrer, Walter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anybody know if rsync can be used in a way to preserve the ACL's?
If not, are there plans to implement it in the near future?
If not, are there other tools which can handle ACL's when
synchronizing?
I don't know if there are
I'm inclined to apply this: at the very least, it doesn't look like it
could damage anything else. Any other opinions?
--
Martin
VA Linux Systems
On 7 Jul 2001, Dave Wreski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I'm using command= in my authorized_keys file in conjunction with rsync,
but for some reason it's matching the wrong key. It also seems arbitrary.
On the local side, I'm using rsync -avze 'ssh -i key' files/ host:/path
and on
On 28 Jun 2001, Kevin Faust [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am running rsync on lots of Win2K machines. It was built from the
rsync 2.4.6 sources using Cygwin.
One issue, the rsyncd.conf file requires a use chroot=false for
the deamon to run on Windows.
The 'use chroot' flag is a
On 2 Jul 2001, Slattery,Rafe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This may be a regularly asked question and if so I apologise... I did do a
search through the list archives but could not find an answer. A web search
did turn up an answer, but unfortunately I don't speak, Flemish or whatever
it is.
On 25 Jun 2001, Dave Dykstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps we need some kind of a config file setup like ssh uses? It
would be possible to specify a different shell/blocking combination as
the default, perhaps even based on hostname matching (again, like ssh
supports), and the user
On 27 Jun 2001, Christina Kingsberry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a version of Rsync for Windows 2000?
I don't know. Do the Win32 binaries not work?
--
Martin
On 26 Jun 2001, Wayne Davison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's a solution with a non-growing buffer.
This is getting disturbingly complex. I realize the problem is
complex too, so this is no slur on Wayne's coding. My gut reaction is
that if we start adding this then the program's behaviour
On 30 Jul 2001, J.Saravanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
bash$ rsync -a [EMAIL PROTECTED]::test test
Password:
@ERROR: auth failed on module test
I did try this command, But the result is same as you can see above..
Any other suggestion?..
What is in the server error log now?
--
On 25 Jun 2001, Wayne Davison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was wondering if the protocol should be updated to avoid ever
assuming that an EOF on the socket was OK. The only case I know of
where this allowed is when we're listing modules from an rsync server.
If we modified the protocol to have
Yes, that sounds like a pretty good plan for (say) rsync 3.0. We all
seem to be more or less on the same track as to how the protocol
should look.
Here are my feelings about the way to get there. I would be happy to
have holes picked in them:
* rsync 2.x works well, but is too crufty to be a
On 25 Jun 2001, Tim Potter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
J.Saravanan writes:
Thanks to you all for the response. And sorry If I've wasted your time.
I found the reason for this not working.
Now I've added the line..
strict modes = false
in to my rsyncd.conf file. Now it
On 25 Jun 2001, Britton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I saw this, which seems like a bug. The only difference between
check_rsync and rsync aliases is that the former uses dry run.
Can you please show us what the alias actually expand to? Reading
your mind at this distance is difficult. ;-)
--
(Thanks for the nice summary.)
I'm pretty open to other people becoming co-maintainers. I think it
would be good to follow the standard open source procedure of giving
access once people have submitted a few good patches to establish
credibility. The final decision is tridge's I think, but it
On 22 Jun 2001, Dave Dykstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My next question involves the use of both the -e ssh option and modules
simultaneously. Does rsync perform a call such as this one as
expected?:
rsync -ogptu -e ssh /path/to/stuff username@hostname::modulename
I was able to
On 22 Jun 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been testing this patch in a duplicate of our production
environment, for a week now. With the patch, the runs complete.
I'm handling 86756263K in 1816688 files (at last count) average 47K
files (ranging up to about .5G).
It seems to solve
On 22 Jun 2001, David Bolen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave Dykstra [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
That level of the network is completely outside of rsync's control; if
you're using -e ssh, do you have problems when you use ssh by itself?
Note that while rsync is certainly above this level of the
On 25 Jun 2001, Tim Potter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
bash$ rsync -a 144.16.251.213::test test
Password:
@ERROR: auth failed on module test
I dont understand this. Can somebody explain as to how to acomplish this.
All suggestions are welcome.
You are probably not logged in as the
On 21 Jun 2001, Jos Backus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 10:34:59AM -0700, Jos Backus wrote:
Here is Debra Weiss's patch to create rsync+, updated to rsync version 2.4.6
by me. More information about rsync+ can be found at
On 13 Jun 2001, Deven Phillips [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am in the process of gathing up information for the creation of an
rsync/srsync io slave for KDE.
I'm happy to hear you're interested in working on this.
I am wondering if I could get your input
on the best approach. I
On 12 Jun 2001, Dave Dykstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2001/06/11 12:09:46 [20857] rsyncd version 2.4.6 starting
2001/06/11 12:09:46 [20857] bind failed on port 873
Incidentally, this message now shows strerror(), so it should be more
obvious in 2.4.7 whether the problem is EACCES (not root)
On 12 Jun 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am a bit confused why using the --cvs-exclude flag would exclude
this file list:
building file list ... done
lib/libXpm.a
lib/libjpeg.a
lib/libwrap.a
lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0/sun4-solaris/auto/GD/GD.so
wrote 385324 bytes read 100 bytes
On 31 May 2001, thomas graichen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
did anyone here get rsync tunneled through ssh working so far?
just to make clear what i mean: i only have an ssh connection
to a host b (say mine is host a) and want to rsync stuff from
host c this way (because i can't do it directly
On 31 May 2001, Rusty Carruth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm. What's wrong with his syntax? (Assuming 'Martin' is a he, sorry
if I'm wrong!) I use 'ssh2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -L 119:news.there.com:119' to
forward nntp all the time and it works fine - what do you know that
I don't? (Ok, yes, I
On 16 May 2001, Jiping Su [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
Could you please tell me Can rsync run as a deamon to
mirror/synchronize a directory automatically ?
I read the man page about it as below:
I mirror a directory between my old and new ftp sites with the
command
rsync -az
On 10 May 2001, Bgs himself [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here it goes:
How do I rsync through firewall ?
I tried to open port 514. When I dump the IP traffic I see continuous
traffic but get :
download.sourceforge.net: Connection refused
unexpected EOF in read_timeout
I don't know where
I can't see the problem yet. I think I might try out Monkey Linux and
see if I can reproduce it. You might also forward the error messages
to the authors of the distribution and see if they have any ideas.
--
Martin
On 2 May 2001, Jeff Ross [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, all, for the suggestions. None of them seemed to work,
though. Last round of testing I removed the R option and added an * after
the trailing directory slash in the exclude file.
Specifically, here is the command I used:
rsync
On 3 May 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have problem with rsync in this ambient:
linux kernel 2.0.34
libc5
gcc 2.7.2
I have some warnings compiling and when I try to use rsync
the files copied have all the same size (4096 byte).
some log from compiling:
The rsync FAQ-O-Matic is now back on line after the migration of
samba.org to the SourceForge network, sponsored by VA Linux Systems.
You can check it out, and add more questions and answers at
http://rsync.samba.org/cgi-bin/rsync.fom
If you notice any remaining problems, please mail me.
--
On 20 Apr 2001, Jason truong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I know most topics regarding rsync resides under *nix but I had a
question regarding using Rsync and NT. One of my NT servers is reporting
critical errors with its paging file. I was wondering if there is a way
to ask rsync to use
On 18 Apr 2001, Lachlan Cranswick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What versions of rsync are you using (latest?). What systems and
what compiler did you use?
Lachlan.
n/m figured it out apparently i need 2 ::
It has nothing to do with compilers. If you specify a source or
destination as
The most likely problem is that there is a
gid = somegroup
entry in your rsyncd.conf that does not correspond to an entry in
/etc/group. For example, you may be trying to set the group to
`nobody', but perhaps DGUX requires `nogroup' or `65533' or something
similar.
--
Martin
-
n that day in a separate directory, but that's not
quite what you need. Why not put it in the FAQ wishlist.
--
Martin Pool, Human Resource
Linuxcare. Inc. +61 2 6262 8990
[EMAIL PROTECTED], http://linuxcare.com.au/
Linuxcare. Putting Open Source to work.
mber would be the limiter for the number of revisions.
And when it reaches that number, do you want it to delete old
revisions, or stop making new revisions?
Perhaps something like --backup=numeric would be a better name. In
the long term it might be better to handle this with scripting.
--
M
many people use the elisp-style names.
--
Martin Pool
On 20 Mar 2001, Rusty Carruth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, there IS this silliness (this won't compile, its just
pseudo-code, as its been a while since I've had to do this):
union hacko_union
{
off_t foo;
long foolongs[2];
};
Well, we do already have our own public domain
This has just been fixed in CVS, along with mcheck
which is also used by getopt.
I'd rather not include getopt. It would be better if people had it
installed as a system library, but until that happens I guess this
will stop people on non-GNU platforms from getting stuck.
--
Martin Pool, Huma
that, following the advice from the autoconf manual to
detect this at runtime.
With the patch, doing an `rdiff sig' on 32MB of data takes about 0.92s
on my TP600E, rather than 1.45s.
--
Martin Pool
"There are three principal ways to lose money: wine, women, and
engineers. While the first two are
access (e.g. Alpha Tru64), but that
will be fixed.
The API is the same as in 0.9.2 except for a couple of minor
extensions, and documented here:
http://rproxy.sourceforge.net/doxygen/librsync/
Get it at
http://rproxy.samba.org/download.html
--
Martin Pool
must be missing something pretty straightforward here, but I'm not sure
what...
Permissions problem?
--
Martin Pool, Human Resource
Linuxcare. Inc. +61 2 6262 8990
[EMAIL PROTECTED], http://linuxcare.com.au/
Linuxcare. Putting Open Source to work.
.95.3 does not seem to understand %jd with -Wformat, so we
get lots of compiler warnings. When it does, I think I will put this
in, with an autoconf test that it is understood.
--
Martin Pool
Linux is the gateway drug for freedom.
-- Don Marti
From: "Milan Dadok" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: rsync patch
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2001 21:31:54 +0100
Hello
I'm to new to rsync. I compiled version rsync-2.4.6 on WinNT using CygWin.
Client mode works fine. After I setup rsync as server everytime I get on client
that, as described in the manual.
--
Martin Pool, Human Resource
Linuxcare. Inc. +61 2 6262 8990
[EMAIL PROTECTED], http://linuxcare.com.au/
Linuxcare. Putting Open Source to work.
for each module. Note that the parameter
name is 'uid' even if you're actually specifying a username rather
than a uid.
Hope that helps,
--
Martin Pool, Human Resource
Linuxcare. Inc. +61 2 6262 8990
[EMAIL PROTECTED], http://linuxcare.com.au/
Linuxcare. Putting Open Source to work.
a *standard*
part of autoconf in CVS, that detects what to add to CFLAGS and
LDFLAGS to get LFS support on your OS. I think this is the direction
we should head.
That sounds like a more clean solution. So, that will just
automatically make off_t be as long as possible?
--
Martin Pool, Human
INT_FORMAT "%lld"
#define OFF_T_PRINT_CAST(long long)
printf("seek to " OFF_T_PRINT_FORMAT, OFF_T_PRINT_CAST foo);
I don't care so much about this in rsync, but librsync trace and error
messages do this all the time, and it's bothered me that they might
give the wrong v
On 28 Feb 2001, Martin Pool [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I don't see is how we could recode this to avoid the zero window
without losing a lot of the pipelining advantage we have now. Going to
a more traditional request/response model in rsync would certainly
make TCP like us but would
into an interesting space
for push-replication.
--
Martin Pool, Human Resource
Linuxcare. Inc. +61 2 6262 8990
[EMAIL PROTECTED], http://linuxcare.com.au/
Linuxcare. Putting Open Source to work.
group of machines to talk on a channel to
stay synchronized, then it could be good. At the moment it doesn't
seem justified.
I really like modularity, and I'd kind of like to be persuaded not to
write our own network layer. But at the moment this doesn't seem like
the one to me.
--
Martin Pool
committed this to rsync.h (v1.98), so it should be in 2.4.7. It's
unconditionally defined. If somebody on AIX could build from anoncvs
and confirm that it works that would be great. (Mail me if you would
like help with CVS.)
Thanks,
--
Martin Pool
in your mail
* are you running rsync as the owner of the files?
--
Martin Pool, Human Resource
Linuxcare. Inc. +61 2 6262 8990
[EMAIL PROTECTED], http://linuxcare.com.au/
Linuxcare. Putting Open Source to work.
be very interested to hear
about the results of `make check' on FreeBSD.
--
Martin Pool
to configure it.please tell me what the format is,more
specifically.
It's very simple:
hosts allow = mymachine.mycompany.com, my.friends.machine.mycompany.com
is all you need.
--
Martin Pool, Human Resource
Linuxcare. Inc. +61 2 6262 8990
[EMAIL PROTECTED], http://linuxcare.com.au/
Linuxcare
ssh thinks is wrong.
--
Martin Pool, Human Resource
Linuxcare. Inc. +61 2 6262 8990
[EMAIL PROTECTED], http://linuxcare.com.au/
Linuxcare. Putting Open Source to work.
.
There are still some optimizations to be done, but I hope that at this
stage both the programming and the command line interface are in their
final form. I'd particularly welcome bug reports about portability,
crashes/corruption, or documentation.
--
Martin Pool
help would be greatly appreciated.
PS...I love your idea of using FAQ-O-Matic.
Yes, it seems like it might work well.
--
Martin Pool, Human Resource
Linuxcare. Inc. +61 2 6262 8990
[EMAIL PROTECTED], http://linuxcare.com.au/
Linuxcare. Putting Open Source to work.
, perhaps register a SourceForge project. You
can always move some functions later.
--
Martin Pool
.
--
Martin Pool
if rsh does not need a password,
then ssh will not either?
--
Martin Pool
his is probably from ssh. Try ssh'ing into the target machine by
hand first, or doing
rsync -e 'ssh -v' other stuff
--
Martin Pool, Human Resource
Linuxcare. Inc. +61 2 6262 8990
[EMAIL PROTECTED], http://linuxcare.com.au/
Linuxcare. Putting Open Source to work.
uot;s". I probably won't
get to it until next week though.
Why not just do it as a shell script?
#! /bin/sh
rsync -e ssh "$@"
The GNU Standards (for what they're worth) deprecate having program
behaviour depend on argv[0], and I'm inclined to agree, especially
because you'r
On 28 Feb 2001, Sherwood Botsford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 1 Mar 2001, Martin Pool wrote:
In addition to using tape backups for off site, I also run rsync to an older
cruft box to make incremental backups. What I would like to do is something
like
rsync -other
rsynch and Samba the that might be able to shed some light on the
subject that frequents this page. grin
I've thought of a couple of ways to limit this.
One would be to run nice to lower the priority.
The other is the use the --bwlimit switch.
Rsynch version is 2.4.4-
--
Martin Pool, Human
.
http://www.openssh.com/images/shherrif.jpg
--
Martin Pool, Human Resource
Linuxcare. Inc. +61 2 6262 8990
[EMAIL PROTECTED], http://linuxcare.com.au/
Linuxcare. Putting Open Source to work.
Index: configure.in
===
RCS file
I'm setting up a more active FAQ system at
http://rsync.samba.org/cgi-bin/rsync.fom
It's currently empty, but please register, try adding content, and
report any bugs in the installation to me. I'll probably import the
existing FAQ sometime soon.
--
Martin Pool, Human Resource
Linuxcare
to write it. Perhaps
it would be OK to just remember a pointer into the exclude list at the
point the option is encountered, and then insert more stuff there
later on.
--
Martin Pool, Human Resource
Linuxcare. Inc. +61 2 6262 8990
[EMAIL PROTECTED], http://linuxcare.com.au/
Linuxcare. Putting
^--- look, nothing here
then you will get a (possibly new) directory called somedirectory
inside the test modile on the remote machine.
--
Martin Pool, Human Resource
Linuxcare. Inc. +61 2 6262 8990
[EMAIL PROTECTED], http://linuxcare.com.au/
Linuxcare. Putting Open Source to work.
.
Interesting...
--
Martin Pool, Human Resource
Linuxcare. Inc. +61 2 6262 8990
[EMAIL PROTECTED], http://linuxcare.com.au/
Linuxcare. Putting Open Source to work.
301 - 400 of 413 matches
Mail list logo
