would it be so much additional work to put the results in a form that
a javascript or any other html-related language could digest?
I mean, I am still in the phase of getting information, but I don't
see how is it possible that Jmol makes possible to render complex 3d
structures, and make zoom
thank you all guys for these useful responses.
so, I see that sympy and sympycore and pynac are coming from different
people.
But I assume that you have a very wide view of the actual situation,
and this is a real added value! I mean, getting to know pros and cons
of each technology is something
On Feb 23, 2009, at 3:13 AM, Maurizio wrote:
thank you all guys for these useful responses.
so, I see that sympy and sympycore and pynac are coming from different
people.
But I assume that you have a very wide view of the actual situation,
and this is a real added value! I mean, getting
Hi Maurizio,
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 00:13:10 -0800 (PST)
Maurizio maurizio.gran...@gmail.com wrote:
thank you all guys for these useful responses.
so, I see that sympy and sympycore and pynac are coming from different
people.
But I assume that you have a very wide view of the actual
Maurizio wrote:
would it be so much additional work to put the results in a form that
a javascript or any other html-related language could digest?
I mean, I am still in the phase of getting information, but I don't
see how is it possible that Jmol makes possible to render complex 3d
On Feb 23, 2009, at 12:46 AM, Burcin Erocal wrote:
Hi Maurizio,
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 00:13:10 -0800 (PST)
Maurizio maurizio.gran...@gmail.com wrote:
thank you all guys for these useful responses.
so, I see that sympy and sympycore and pynac are coming from
different
people.
But I
I totally agree with you, the power of SAGE should be primarily to
allow a transparent usage of different tools without hassles.
Provided that, anyone could be free to use different features from any
package.
But in my opinion SAGE's first aim should be to provide good
capabilities, possibly
Em Sáb, 2009-02-21 às 07:57 -0800, Maurizio escreveu:
I admit that I've never heard of Pynac.
Actually there are two Pynac's out there, one of them is a sage insider
project to replace Maxima as a symbolics backend, since that greatly
impacts performance and builds.
I am wondering what do
On Feb 23, 2009, at 10:05 PM, Ronan Paixão wrote:
You pretty much have the same problems as I do, since I'm also an
Electronic Engineer. I also find sage hard to use from a
non-mathematician's POV (dealing with Fields isn't something one's
accustomed to do in Engineering).
This is a big
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 12:04 AM, Maurizio maurizio.gran...@gmail.com wrote:
would it be so much additional work to put the results in a form that
a javascript or any other html-related language could digest?
I mean, I am still in the phase of getting information, but I don't
see how is it
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 1:25 AM, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote:
It's because sympy, sympycore and pynac were all written by different
people and as of now they are not compatible. I don't like the
situation either, and if I manage to find funding for the summer, I'd
like to speedup
Another example is with matplotlib. As I can read somewhere on the
web, there are different opinions about using the SAGE plot
capabilities rather than this external package.
Sage's 2d plotting just uses matplotlib, which is a standard package
included in SAge. Matplotlib's pylab
Hi Maurizio,
On Fri, 20 Feb 2009 16:21:36 -0800 (PST)
Maurizio maurizio.gran...@gmail.com wrote:
unfortunately, I don't have the code with me right now (I could give
you on monday), but I'm pretty sure it is something REALLY
straightforward and not optimized, like this:
def coll(expr,s):
Maurizio wrote:
Another example is with matplotlib. As I can read somewhere on the
web, there are different opinions about using the SAGE plot
capabilities rather than this external package.
Sage's 2d plotting just uses matplotlib, which is a standard package
included in SAge. Matplotlib's
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 7:57 AM, Maurizio maurizio.gran...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Burcin,
thank you very much for this!
I admit that I've never heard of Pynac. I'm really glad to have
subscribed this group, otherwise I couldn't have discovered it!
This brings me to a new question: how are
On Feb 22, 2009, at 1:25 AM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
It's because sympy, sympycore and pynac were all written by different
people and as of now they are not compatible. I don't like the
situation either, and if I manage to find funding for the summer, I'd
like to speedup sympy using Cython to
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 6:34 PM, Maurizio maurizio.gran...@gmail.com wrote:
...
Example: it seems to me that there is no built-in implementation of
the collect() function in SAGE, though there is a (seemingly)
working one in SymPy. So I wrote myself a very simple function whose
argument
unfortunately, I don't have the code with me right now (I could give
you on monday), but I'm pretty sure it is something REALLY
straightforward and not optimized, like this:
def coll(expr,s):
import sympy as sp
spexpr = sp.sympify(expand(expr))
temp = sp.collect(spexpr,s)
return
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 3:34 PM, Maurizio maurizio.gran...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi people,
hope you don't get offended since I joined this group by simply being
a pretty enthusiastic SAGE user.
I am an electronic engineer, so I try to build up myself the tool I
find missing (or simply I can't
19 matches
Mail list logo
