unsubscribe
From: Ole Alstrup <alst...@yahoo.com>
To: Colloidal Silver List <silver-list@eskimo.com>
Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2011 1:41:48 PM
Subject: CS>Particle size measurement
Can someone please help me out on this one, since I am a neophyt
When you see a particle size that size, it is not something that was
ever in the water being tested...entirely BOGUS.
That's the diameter of an oxidized Ion made when the CS sample was dried in
order to prepare it for TEM scanning.
It was never a "particle" in-the-water.
Micron is short fo
Micrometer and micron are the same thing.
David
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 10:41 AM, Ole Alstrup wrote:
> Can someone please help me out on this one, since I am a neophyte when it
> comes to particle size measurement.
>
> A particle the size of 0.8 nanometers is 0.0008 microns - but how many
> mic
Can someone please help me out on this one, since I am a neophyte when it comes
to particle size measurement.
A particle the size of 0.8 nanometers is 0.0008 microns - but how many
micrometers is that?
Thanks.
6) Silver is accumulated over the lifetime in the tissues. But note the
part below that states "High concentrations of silver in the tissues,
however, occurs only after the careless administration of
silver-containing medicinals." This is referring to SILVER SALTS and not
colloidal silvers. Howev
This will be in several posts due to the length.
Regarding Argyria. You have a concern about silver particle size
increasing the risk of Argyria. From what I have been able to determine,
Argyria is caused by silver salts and not elemental silver. The
following excerpts are from Appendix 9 of "S
ruary 10, 2009 10:03 AM
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: CS>Particle size makes all the difference
I have to truly believe that to large of particle size is what cause's the most
problems in making CS. As in undesirable materials binding with the CS to make
proteins.Purity of substance is th
Interesting post. Why do you think you might have proteins in your
silver water? if you are making it according to the guidelines, there
should only be very pure water and silver to start with, and a current
control on the power source. That ought to make ionic silver, which is
the smallest si
I have to truly believe that to large of particle size is what cause's the most
problems in making CS. As in undesirable materials binding with the CS to make
proteins.Purity of substance is the issue! Also know as quality control.I
believe consuming large amounts of 10pmm with the smallest par
But it works Marshall! Mind you, these are PET 1 bottles which I
thought was ok. Ode says it has probably 'used up' whatever is in the
plastic, which then makes it ok to use again. dee
Marshall Dudley wrote:
I would not use PET it has plasticizers in it, which diffuse out over
time. I only
Dee wrote:
Actually I would beg to differ about the plastic Marshall, as I have
had negative experiences with it. I still use it, but have to
'season' the bottles first i.e. put in either distilled water or made
CS and leave it for a few days. If it is made CS, it will go yellow
and then I t
Hi Bob Larson,
Hi,
Liver and the kidneys both are involved in the excretion of silver. I suggest
http://www.silver-colloids.com/Papers/AltmanStudy.PDF on Silver excretion from
the body.
Silver Dust ranges from very large particles to microscopic. In Scandinavia,
Silver Reclaimation workers
Actually I would beg to differ about the plastic Marshall, as I have had
negative experiences with it. I still use it, but have to 'season' the
bottles first i.e. put in either distilled water or made CS and leave it
for a few days. If it is made CS, it will go yellow and then I tip it
away a
Re: CS>Particle size - Comments pleaseyeah, that's the kind of thing where
you can end up with big problems like convulsive seizures and organ damage.
the scariest stuff that i found in gov't websites re silver dangers always
turns out to be from something like industrial exposure sit
08:30:10 2008
Subject: RE: CS>Particle size - Comments please
90% of an **inhaled** dose of finely divided silver **dust** was
excreted by dogs in 30 days though the feces. [Phalen and Morrow 1973]
The only way that silver can do that, is though the blood stream.
Ode
--
The Silver L
com>
/*Subject:*/ RE: CS>Particle size - Comments please
The diameter of a silver ion is around 0.000252 microns.
At least 80% of even a yellow brew is ions.
Ode
At 02:54 PM 9/4/2008 -0500, you wrote:
>
>Ok, I am responding to my own query. If I have something wrong, l
Ode Coyote wrote:
90% of an **inhaled** dose of finely divided silver **dust** was
excreted by dogs in 30 days though the feces. [Phalen and Morrow 1973]
The only way that silver can do that, is though the blood stream.
Ode
That is correct. When there is a foreign particle in the lungs,
Inhaling silver dust? Now that scares me.
- Original Message -
From: Ode Coyote
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Sent: Fri Sep 05 08:30:10 2008
Subject: RE: CS>Particle size - Comments please
90% of an **inhaled** dose of finely divided silver **dust** was
excreted by dogs in 30 d
Ode,
Thanks to you and Marshall for your responses. My own experiences told me
something was wrong with the analysis and I was missing something.
- Steve N
- Original Message -
From: Ode Coyote
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Sent: Fri Sep 05 07:47:03 2008
Subject: RE: CS>Particle s
From: Ode Coyote
Date: 9/5/2008 12:18:53 PM
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: CS>Particle size - Comments please
The diameter of a silver ion is around 0.000252 microns.
At least 80% of even a yellow brew is ions.
Ode
At 02:54 PM 9/4/2008 -0500, you wrote:
>
>Ok, I am
so mean that little CS is absorbed sublingually.
>
>
> Comments? Ideas?
>
> - Steve N
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Norton, Steve [mailto:stephen.nor...@ngc.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2008 8:06 AM
> To: silver-list@eskimo.com
> Subject: CS>Particle s
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: CS>Particle size
Does anyone know what the maximum size particle is that can be absorbed
into the body either sublingually or through the stomach and intestines?
- Steve N
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
Ve
This would also mean that little CS is absorbed sublingually.
Comments? Ideas?
- Steve N
-Original Message-
From: Norton, Steve [_mailto:stephen.nor...@ngc.com_]
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2008 8:06 AM
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: CS>Particle size
Does anyone know what the
And in my case it gets even *more* complicated because when I got yellow
CS it wasn't the CS or the DW which caused this, but the actual plastic
bottles I put it in. So the particle size would be bigger, but it
wouldn't have been silver that made it so. Would it? dee
Norton, Steve wrote:
ilver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: CS>Particle size - Comments please
Hi; this is a little too mechanistic to account for the body's ability
to break down and recombine not only proteins sugars and fats but also
mineral constituents of what we ingest. Nevertheless, it's been stated
h
crease or decrease absorption.
> * This would also mean that little CS is absorbed sublingually.
>
>
> Comments? Ideas?
>
> - Steve N
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Norton, Steve [mailto:stephen.nor...@ngc.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2008 8:06 AM
eve N
-Original Message-
From: Norton, Steve [mailto:stephen.nor...@ngc.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2008 8:06 AM
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: CS>Particle size
Does anyone know what the maximum size particle is that can be absorbed
into the body either sublingually or through the
Does anyone know what the maximum size particle is that can be absorbed
into the body either sublingually or through the stomach and intestines?
- Steve N
--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.o
Evening Chuck,
>>At 06:48 PM 9/1/2008, you wrote:
Not to push you over the edge, Neville, but you have to adjust your
thinking a bit.
It is indeed the "current" that determines your result, not the
voltage.
I thought you meant particle, not sure what "Results" mean ?
Sounds like a complex, c
Sure enough, Mike.
I've answered him on the OT list, hopefully in a kindly way.
-Raine
M. G. Devour wrote:
Well, Raine, I hope you'll be kindly enough to meet him... half way or
wherever you think he is! Ya gotta admit not everyone is going to feel
the same way about your pets as you do.
> Dear Raine The Rat Momma,
>
> As a quid pro quo for my sensitivity to your rats, how about having your
> rats telepathically communicate with my rats to have them stop invading
> my home and destroying my stuff and attacking my health with their toxic
> excretions?
>
> I will never again insult
reply on the OT
list.
Not fond of rats,
Jim
-Original Message-
From: Raine [mailto:rainelov...@sbcglobal.net]
Sent: Friday, May 13, 2005 1:02 AM
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: CS>particle size in nebulizing, was Re: CS>CS pneumonia protocol
with a
-
From: Jim Holmes [mailto:ami...@starband.net]
Sent: Friday, May 13, 2005 10:40 AM
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: CS>particle size in nebulizing, was Re: CS>CS pneumonia
protocol with air brush
Dear Raine The Rat Momma,
I am sure that experience your rats are sensitive, lovi
[mailto:rainelov...@sbcglobal.net]
Sent: Friday, May 13, 2005 1:02 AM
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: CS>particle size in nebulizing, was Re: CS>CS pneumonia
protocol with air brush
Ummm yes, people DO love their rats. Very much.
Some of these rat lovers are members of this list, i
Ummm yes, people *DO* love their rats. Very much.
Some of these rat lovers are members of this list, in fact.
This rat lover, in particular, would appreciate a bit more sensitivity
when speaking to a diverse group such as this one.
-Raine, rat momma
Jim Holmes wrote:
People must really lo
riginal Message-
From: sol [mailto:sol...@sweetwaterhsa.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 10:12 AM
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: CS>particle size in nebulizing, was Re: CS>CS pneumonia protocol
with air brush
I recently ran across a site on nebulizing pet rats that states you
can&#
Hi Sol,
Thank you. I will visit the rat people site.
Jim
-Original Message-
From: sol [mailto:sol...@sweetwaterhsa.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 10:12 AM
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: CS>particle size in nebulizing, was Re: CS>CS pneumonia protocol
with air br
I recently ran across a site on nebulizing pet rats that states you
can't just use any old nebulizer for rats, they need a small particle
size for nebbing to be effective. Wasn't in regard to nebbing CS, but
regular abx nebulizer formulas.
Still, if the smallest possible particle size is desirea
Gaston wrote:
> To anyone that wishes to comment pls.
>
> Here is a comment taken from the following web site:
> http://www.elixa.com/silver/lindmn.htm
>
> "It's In The Water
> ... Another variable that influences particle size is t
Vince Richter wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> What about constant current? Is higher temperatures advantageous in
> some way without the increased particle size? I use HVAC NST 15,000
> volts limited to 30 mA cone method. It is nice to take only 8 hours to
> make 2 gallons if I don't cool it instead of 1
Ode,
I get the point now. Thank you for the clarification.
I'll also keep your info for reference.
Gaston
--
The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.
Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org
To post, address your message to: silver
At 02:05 PM 10/11/2003 -0500, you wrote:
>Ode Coyote. , Mike Monett.
>
>Thank you for all the useful info that you have provided.
>
>I do understand that it will cause agglomeration if we do heat the water
over 110
>degrees. I use a very low constant current. Therefore, I have no
difficulty in gett
Hi Mike,
What about constant current? Is higher temperatures advantageous in
some way without the increased particle size? I use HVAC NST 15,000
volts limited to 30 mA cone method. It is nice to take only 8 hours to
make 2 gallons if I don't cool it instead of 12 to 16hrs with a fan
blowing o
Ode Coyote. , Mike Monett.
Thank you for all the useful info that you have provided.
I do understand that it will cause agglomeration if we do heat the water over
110
degrees. I use a very low constant current. Therefore, I have no difficulty in
getting clear CS.
However, what I understand in
In reality based on experience, the slower the reaction, the smaller the particles right down to virtually no "particles" at all. [ionic silver]
You can however have a slower reaction along with faster production by using larger electrodes.
Heating the water increases initial conductivity which i
url: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/m63380.html
CS>CS particle size
From: Gaston
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 06:47:41
> To anyone that wishes to comment pls.
> Here is a comment taken from the following web site:
> http://www.elixa.com/silver/lindmn.htm
To anyone that wishes to comment pls.
Here is a comment taken from the following web site:
http://www.elixa.com/silver/lindmn.htm
"It's In The Water
... Another variable that influences particle size is the water temperature.
The w
> > The PL-PSDA particle size distribution analyser is an integrated,
> >
> > automated system for the rapid determination of particle size
distribution
> >
> > of colloidal dispersions...in ten minutes
> >
> http://www.polymerlabs.com/partsize/
> jr
Sounds good, but it only measures down to 5 nm.
That looks hot.
James-Osbourne: Holmes
-Original Message-
From: jrowl...@nctimes.net [mailto:jrowl...@nctimes.net]
Sent: Monday, September 02, 2002 9:17 AM
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: CS>particle size distribution analyser
Dear Santa,
> The PL-PSDA particle size distri
Dear Santa,
> The PL-PSDA particle size distribution analyser is an integrated,
>
> automated system for the rapid determination of particle size distribution
>
> of colloidal dispersions...in ten minutes
>
http://www.polymerlabs.com/partsize/
jr
--
The silver-list is a moderated forum for disc
mistake.
Regards
Ivan
> -Original Message-
> From: Marshall Dudley [mailto:mdud...@execonn.com]
> Sent: Thursday, 25 July 2002 2:38 a.m.
> To: *Silver-List*
> Subject: Re: CS>Particle size vs. color
>
>
> Ivan Anderson wrote:
>
> > Hi Russ,
> >
> >
.
> To: silver-list@eskimo.com
> Subject: Re: CS>Particle size vs. color
>
>
> Ivan wrote:
>
> > No. The Tyndall Effect is only manifest when the particle is much
> > smaller than the wavelength of light. For instance, gold
> colloids look
> > red when the p
Marshall wrote:
>
> Although you are correct that his statement is incorrect, he is not
> talking about the tyndall, which is scattering of light, but rather the
> color, which is the complement of the absorption spectrum of the
> particles. They are independent of each other, except both do vary
-
From: Frank Key [mailto:fr...@strsoft.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 9:17 AM
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: CS>Particle size vs. color
Ivan wrote:
> No. The Tyndall Effect is only manifest when the particle is much
> smaller than the wavelength of light. For insta
Frank Key wrote:
> Ivan wrote:
>
> The color of a colloid is not solely determined by particle size. It is also
> influenced by the particle dispersion which is effected by zetapotential. A
> small ionic change can change the zetapotential and make a sol consisting of
> the same sized particles to
Ivan wrote:
> No. The Tyndall Effect is only manifest when the particle is much
> smaller than the wavelength of light. For instance, gold colloids look
> red when the particles are about 13nm in diameter.
>
> Regards
> Ivan.
That statement is not true. TE intensity of reflected light is maximum
Ivan Anderson wrote:
> Hi Russ,
>
> > According to my understanding of the Tyndall effect, I
> > infer that this color
> > indicates that the diameter these particles of CS (+
> > impurities) corresponds
> > to the wavelength of red light, ~700 nm, whereas yellow CS
> > particles would
> > be arou
-Original Message-
> From: Russ Rosser [mailto:russros...@rovin.net]
> Sent: Sunday, 14 July 2002 7:32 a.m.
> To: silver-list@eskimo.com
> Subject: CS>Particle size vs. color
>
>
> Hello, list--
>
> A small CS batch turned pale PINK, ostensibly because of contai
Hello, list--
A small CS batch turned pale PINK, ostensibly because of container
contamination (perhaps silver agglomerates upon suspended particles, as
raindrops condense upon airborne dust particles).
According to my understanding of the Tyndall effect, I infer that this color
indicates that th
y, June 17, 2002 3:06 PM
> Subject: Re: CS>Particle Size Question
>
> > "General Chemistry", ninth edition, Holtzclaw, Robinson and Odom,
> published by
> > D.C. Health and Company 1991, lists silver has having a diameter of 1.44
> > angstroms and a silver ion as
1.44 A is the atomic radius, the diameter is twice the radius.
frank key
- Original Message -
From: "Marshall Dudley"
To:
Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 3:06 PM
Subject: Re: CS>Particle Size Question
> "General Chemistry", ninth edition, Holtzclaw, Robinson an
ysis process are much larger, being in
> the 10 to 90 nm range. Typically, 90% of the silver contributed by the
> electrodes winds up as ionic silver and 10% is particles.
>
> frank key
>
> - Original Message -
> From:
> To:
> Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 12:42 PM
Thanks Frank, good information and now filed away for future reference.\
John
-Original Message-
From: Frank Key [mailto:fr...@strsoft.com]
Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 11:52 AM
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: CS>Particle Size Question
Silver particles don't break off.
ted by the
electrodes winds up as ionic silver and 10% is particles.
frank key
- Original Message -
From:
To:
Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 12:42 PM
Subject: CS>Particle Size Question
> > Can anyone verify the following:
> >
> > > When applying current to silver
> Can anyone verify the following:
>
> > When applying current to silver in solution, metallic silver will always
> >
> > break off at the same size, 1.26 angstroms (.1 microns).
> >
> > This particle is so small that the next stop on the road to smallness is
> >
> > the atom itself.
> >
> http
The following quoted from a commercial site.
Can anyone vouch for 30 volts as "best", would AC or DC have an
advantage
and does the resultant particle size seem reasonable?
"...The very best voltage for the reaction is 30 volts, because the
electrodes
run the cleanest at this voltage...Using this
Hi Jr.
According to the T.E. M.'s that Stephen Quintro ran on my HVAC ARC CS the
particle size had a dual distribution of 1-2 nm and 6-8 nm. Now Franks'
Zetasizer gives different results but Frank would never tell me how he
calibrated the "X" axis of his plots.
The T.E. if there is one can olny b
Which production method produces the smallest silver particle size and
what might that size be?
A PBS special (NOVA, transcript #2815) two nights ago, "Bioterror",
casually
mentioned that it was the U.S. strain of weaponized anthrax (confirmed
by DNA analysis) that's being found in the mail, with
Terry,
When I purchased my spectrophotometer I also had to buy a standard AgNO3
that had 1000 ug/ml in 5% HNO3, or 1000ppm.
That was diluted to 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, and 60 ug/ml of ppm's to
calibate the tester. The test is the industry standard to measure the
amount of silver in the waste water of
In a message dated 10/11/2001 4:36:27 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
tcj...@yahoo.ca writes:
> In the field of ionic silver, what kinds of ppm are
> available? And is it appropriate to designate ionic
> silver in ppm terms? Parts-per-million of what? Ions?
> How is this measured? What is the maximum
Terry,
Any time you want to send me about half an ounce of your 500 ppm CS I will test
it FREE that is FREE.
"Ole Bob"
--
The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.
To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to:
silver-list-requ...@eski
> If nothing else, it would mean you could dilute it and use it.
Terry ~
I see 500 ppm CS at the health food store. There are a couple different
brands, but they do not carry anything less than 500 ppm. I have been using
HHA 500 ppm CS and it is goldish colored. It is said to be pharmaceutical
Terry,
Please remember that "eye R an elrctic enganear" and chemistry is not my
main field, for what it is worth I have tested 3 commercial CS's rated at
500 ppm, and the ionic portion measured any where from 45 to 105 ppm. They
all had a strong Tyndall so there was also some particles in them. As
Terry Chamberlin wrote:
> Marshall said:
> "Our testing indicates that once you get to about 20
> ppm, the particles get larger instead of more
> numerous."
>
> Terry responds:
> I've heard this before. But it seems that if that were
> true, it would be impossible to make 500 ppm CS that
> was cle
Marshall said:
"Our testing indicates that once you get to about 20
ppm, the particles get larger instead of more
numerous."
Terry responds:
I've heard this before. But it seems that if that were
true, it would be impossible to make 500 ppm CS that
was clear. I am given to understand that ppm is
r
C process is the
> best "layman's" method to make colloidal gold but is unsatisfactory for
> silver as it produces very large particles]
>
Bill: I believe Ole Bob and I have found that the CS particle size as well as
production rate obtained from the HVAC Arc Process can be
If it does, it's rancid.
DON'T eat rancid oils
Flax SEED doesn't go rancid in storage.
I grind it in a coffee grinder when I use it, a couple tablespoons at a time.
Chuck
Some people live life in the fast lane. I live in oncoming traffic
Market it as "Silvalung".
James-Osbourne: Holmes
-Original Message-
From: Marshall Dudley [mailto:mdud...@execonn.com]
Sent: Friday, August 03, 2001 9:16 AM
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: CS>Why Study Ionic "CS" and CS Particle Size?
I don't know.
2 are to be
preferred.
By the way, the above reaction will proceed quite readily in sunlight.
Ivan.
> -Original Message-
> From: Frank Key [mailto:fr...@strsoft.com]
> Sent: Sunday, 5 August 2001 04:00
> To: *Silver-List*
> Subject: Re: CS>What Happens to CS Particle Size &
Ivan wrote:
> I think you will find that UV light will not reduce H2O2 at all, but rather
> oxidise it further to the highly reactive OH- radical.
What we have found is that practice confirms theory:
H2O2 + UV -> H2O + O2
Ultraviolet light reduces H2O2 to water (H2O) and free oxygen O2.
To pr
In an outdoor out fitter store I found a water purification kit with two substances. Turned out that swimming pool chlorine was one and the "neutralizer" [to neutralize the chlorine and get rid of the pool water flavor] was hydrogen peroxide.
Ken
At 07:06 AM 8/4/01 EDT, you wrote:
In a m
I did find it curious that water with an added oxygen atom would have any
flavor at all. I assumed the flavor had something to do with the other
stuff in the water [silver] and stuff getting unstuck that was already in
my mouth. Stabilizer flavor makes sense.
I'll have a UV light installed in a m
>
> Gee, excessive amounts of h2o2 makes anything taste nasty, does it not,
>even water?
### Yup, sure does. I can't taste two teaspoons in a liter , so, I don't
believe that to be an excessive amount and it will clear up large particle
pale violet CS over night. The H2O2 might have other bene
I am controlling current by dropping the voltage as conductivity increases with a transistorized circuit, so the current stays absolutely constant. [Not just current limiting as with a resistive element]
Constant current 'should' result in constant particle size but doesn't always due to agglome
Sunday, 5 August 2001 00:06
> To: silver-list@eskimo.com
> Subject: Re: CS>What Happens to CS Particle Size & DistributionWhenH2O2
> is Added
>
>
> Roger wrote:
>
>
> > Frank: So for a given CS product, using H2O2 to oxidize
> particulate silver,
> > and the
Roger wrote:
> Frank: So for a given CS product, using H2O2 to oxidize particulate silver,
> and then using UV light to reduce any remaining H2O2 should be a good way to
> make 100% ionic "CS"? If that's true, how does one know that there has been
> sufficient UV exposure to remove any residua
In a message dated 8/3/2001 7:14:16 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
fr...@strsoft.com writes:
> The industrial grade H2O2 apparently has chemicals added to stabilize the
> H2O2 and they taste bad. Food grade has no such stabilizers added, so it
> should all be converted to water under UV. Once conve
Wayne wrote:
> > I'm not talking about taking h202. It's about its effect on CS and how
> >excessive amounts of peroxide makes CS taste nasty.
>
>Gee, excessive amounts of h2o2 makes anything taste nasty, does it not,
> even water?
Assuming one is using "Food Grade", not industrial grade,
Evening Ken,
At 01:52 PM 08/03/2001 -0700, you wrote:
I'm not talking about taking h202. It's about its effect on CS and how
excessive amounts of peroxide makes CS taste nasty.
Gee, excessive amounts of h2o2 makes anything taste nasty, does it not,
even water?
I am still trying to figur
In a message dated 8/3/2001 2:44:32 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
coy...@alltel.net writes:
> Particle size increases with current draw which is only related to
> conductivity in a non current controlled generator. I was using a current
> controlled generator at 1.9ma with constant stir. If I use CS
Ken;
The moral is LEAVE THE H2O2 ALONE !!
"Ole Bob"
--
The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.
To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to:
silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com -or- silver-digest-requ...@eskimo.com
with the word su
winter
as our water level is really low out here this year.
Joanne
- Original Message -
From: Ode Coyote
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Sent: Friday, August 03, 2001 11:11 AM
Subject: Re: CS>Why Study Ionic "CS" and CS Particle Size?
I certainly acknowledge
/3/01 EDT, you wrote:
>>>>
In a message dated 8/3/2001 10:57:55 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
coy...@alltel.net writes:
Subj:Re: CS>What Happens to CS Particle Size & Distribution When H2O2 is
Added
Date:8/3/2001 10:57:55 AM Eastern Daylight Time
From:coy...@alltel.net (Od
OK sure, but why did the peroxide clean the silver oxides off at first and then become black again.
Ken
At 08:11 AM 8/3/01 -0700, you wrote:
>
>I once tried cleaning blackened electrodes in H2O2. They cleaned up very fast but blackened again when left in the peroxide.
>Ode Coyote wrote:
>
>
>H2O2
I'm not talking about taking h202. It's about its effect on CS and how
excessive amounts of peroxide makes CS taste nasty.
Ken
At 07:53 AM 8/3/01 -0700, you wrote:
>Perhaps more H2O2 will make the CS go totally ionic with no TE..but that
>stuff is totally worthless to consume as it makes one f
:41:52 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
> coy...@alltel.net writes:
>
>
>
>> Subj:Re: CS>What Happens to CS Particle Size & Distribution When
>> H2O2 is
>> Added
>> Date:8/3/2001 9:41:52 AM Eastern Daylight Time
>> From:coy...@alltel.net (Ode Coyote)
>&
ell so that I still ended up with a bunch of
> smaller ones
> which gave a TE with no larger ones.
>
> Marshall
>
Marshall: As I said earlier, the CS particle size you end up with will be a
function of the H2O2: total CS particle ratio. I don't believe this
interaction is l
In a message dated 8/3/2001 10:57:55 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
coy...@alltel.net writes:
> Subj:Re: CS>What Happens to CS Particle Size & Distribution When H2O2 is
> Added
> Date:8/3/2001 10:57:55 AM Eastern Daylight Time
> From:coy...@alltel.net (Ode Coyote)
> Reply-
within a range might
> actually
> provide some greater benefit. I dunno.
>
> Ken: As I mentioned in an earlier post, it should be quite easy to
> determine
> if ionic CS has germicidal activity in the body. I think the
> implications of
> hav
I once tried cleaning blackened electrodes in H2O2. They cleaned up very fast
but blackened again when left in the peroxide.
Ode Coyote wrote:
H2O2 causes oxidation, this is why they became black again.
Blessings
Ted
--
The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.
1 - 100 of 148 matches
Mail list logo
