Thakn you thank you.
Faith
- Original Message -
From: Simon Jester tansta...@libertytrek.org
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2007 9:19 PM
Subject: Re: CS tryptophan repost from june'06
On 10/29/2007 faith gagne wrote:
Eternal Vigilance is the Price of Liberty
-Original Message-
From: Simon Jester [mailto:tansta...@libertytrek.org]
Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2007 4:23 PM
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: CS tryptophan repost from june'06
On 10/27/2007, Ode Coyote (odecoy...@alltel.net) wrote:
It was created because no one was doing
On 10/29/2007, Dan Nave (dan.n...@nilfisk-advance.com) wrote:
And please don't waste my time yammering about 'the general
welfare' clause - it ISN'T a delegation of authority, and has no
meaning, except for power-hungry mad-men and gullible fools...
Section. 8.
The Congress shall have Power
, but is joined by the White House and particularly the
constitutionally derelict U.S. Supreme Court. -Walter Williams
- Original Message -
From: Dan Nave dan.n...@nilfisk-advance.com
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2007 5:37 AM
Subject: RE: CS tryptophan repost from june'06
'Eternal Vigilance is the Price of Liberty'. (Brigham Young?)
Faith
- Original Message -
From: James McCourt, Ph.D. dr...@earthlink.net
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2007 2:27 PM
Subject: Re: CS tryptophan repost from june'06
THE FOUNDATION: CONSTITUTIONAL
On 10/29/2007 faith gagne wrote:
Eternal Vigilance is the Price of Liberty
Wendell Phillips
http://freedomkeys.com/vigil.htm
--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org
To post, address your
to stifle intelligent discussion.
Paula
- Original Message -
From: Ode Coyote odecoy...@alltel.net
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2007 8:20 AM
Subject: Re: CS tryptophan repost from june'06
We don't pay the FDA enough to do thier job. Fact.
Nor have we
If overt is blocked, go subvert.
It can be long quiet haul, but a better idea trumps a bad one.
Subversion sneaks it into the back door, into common use and traditional
before the guards know to look away from the gates.
The LAW outlines minimal expectations of civility.
It does have
On 10/27/2007, Ode Coyote (odecoy...@alltel.net) wrote:
It was created because no one was doing *any* job.
That was the *excuse* provided... but it was a MANUFACTURED one.
It isn't the Federal Governments JOB to police the food supply. If you
disagree, please point to the
- Original Message -
From: Ode Coyote odecoy...@alltel.net
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2007 11:39 AM
Subject: Re: CS tryptophan repost from june'06
I didn't object to the fact that you have a different view or opinion. What
I objected to was several of your
We don't pay the FDA enough to do thier job. Fact.
Nor have we defined what it is specifically enough for our vague rules to
be followed.
All we can do is bitch and snipe when something goes wrong.
It was created because no one was doing *any* job.
No, it isn't perfect, nothing is perfect.
At 03:09 PM 10/26/2007 -0500, you wrote:
Yes, I had heard that too. I knew one who took tryptophan for a long time
prior to that batch with good results. I read that that was a bad batch,
and then the FDA decided to ban it, which seemed pretty extreme to me at
the time.
The genetic
This disinformation and muddling of facts is not at all helpful and appears
to attempt to stifle intelligent discussion.
Paula
- Original Message -
From: Ode Coyote odecoy...@alltel.net
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2007 8:20 AM
Subject: Re: CS tryptophan repost
One of the best posts I've seem...
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com [mailto:silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com]
On Behalf Of Ode Coyote
Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2007 6:20 AM
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: CS tryptophan repost from june'06
We don't
, 2007 8:20 AM
Subject: Re: CS tryptophan repost from june'06
We don't pay the FDA enough to do thier job. Fact.
Nor have we defined what it is specifically enough for our vague
rules to
be followed.
All we can do is bitch and snipe when something goes wrong.
It was created because no one
Cross-posting to the OT list so we can start migrating things there...
Ken writes:
We have Governments to control us because we don't control ourselves,
then whine when they do...and whine when they don't.
Some people, Ken, do not whine when they don't control us. We're
surprised and
On 10/27/2007, David (dr...@montrose.net) wrote:
One of the best posts I've seem...
Thanks
Rotflmaoayii...
--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org
To post, address your message to:
On 10/27/2007, Clayton Family (clay...@skypoint.com) wrote:
It has been designed to do so. And the chem companies have even gone
to the extremes to defeat all efforts to have any labels at all.
There are alot of people that want labeling, at the least, but they
have lost the fight because of
At 12:46 PM 10/25/2007 -0400, you wrote:
Ode Coyote wrote:
L Tryptophan was temporarily banned because a huge Japanese company
tried a new cheaper process of making it and it turned up being toxic,
resulting in a few deaths.
They had flooded the market with no way to trace what Tryptofan
At 05:32 PM 10/25/2007 -0400, you wrote:
On 10/25/2007, Ode Coyote (odecoy...@alltel.net) wrote:
L Tryptophan was temporarily banned because a huge Japanese company tried
a new cheaper process of making it and it turned up being toxic,
resulting in a few deaths.
They had flooded the market
On 10/26/2007, Ode Coyote (odecoy...@alltel.net) wrote:
Yes, flooded is the correct term. [maybe not inundated ]
That Japanese outfit was HUGE and made tryptofan a lot cheaper than
anyone else using their new [faulty] process.
It was due to using GENETICALLY ENGINEERED BACTERIA... they had
Yes, I had heard that too. I knew one who took tryptophan for a long
time prior to that batch with good results. I read that that was a bad
batch, and then the FDA decided to ban it, which seemed pretty extreme
to me at the time.
The genetic engineering in food *really* compromises the value
L Tryptophan was temporarily banned because a huge Japanese company
tried a new cheaper process of making it and it turned up being toxic,
resulting in a few deaths.
They had flooded the market with no way to trace what Tryptofan was in what
bottle, so it was ALL recalled and banned from
Ode Coyote wrote:
L Tryptophan was temporarily banned because a huge Japanese company
tried a new cheaper process of making it and it turned up being toxic,
resulting in a few deaths.
They had flooded the market with no way to trace what Tryptofan was in
what bottle, so it was ALL
On 10/25/2007, Ode Coyote (odecoy...@alltel.net) wrote:
L Tryptophan was temporarily banned because a huge Japanese company
tried a new cheaper process of making it and it turned up being
toxic, resulting in a few deaths.
They had flooded the market
'Flooded the market'? They were selling a
Ah. Yes, that was interesting, though after reading BROJON for many
months, I came to have nagging doubts about the author, who seems to be
an authority on anything and everything, and, in his own mind,
consistently finds brilliant insights and solutions where everyone else
has failed.
That essay by Marshall Smith was interesting, but after reading BROJON
for many months, I came to have nagging doubts about the author, who
seems to be an authority on anything and everything, and, in his own
mind, consistently finds brilliant insights and solutions where
everyone else has
for those who may be interested.
--- Jonathan B. Britten wrote:
List,
Many members know about big Pharm fraud, but few
examples are as
compelling at the L-Tryptophan scam, which I recall
very, very well.
BROJON, although being rather uneven in my opinion,
has a great piece
which
28 matches
Mail list logo
