After migrating from solr to a load balanced solrcloud with 3 ZKs on the same
machines and solr has 3 shards (one per node) We see this logged in the UI on
one of our solrs.
Does anyone know what this is symptomatic of?
java.lang.NegativeArraySizeException
at org.apache.lucene.util.Prio
p the solrcloud environment so they can take the
data that already exists in our current solr? We have about 16 indexes for
sitecore with the biggest one being analytics (around 45-50gbs).
Thanks,
Darren Walker
ould also be 0.
>
> After changing to 0 indexing became a lot slower though (no exceptions in
> log).
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Search-opening-hours-tp4225250p4227531.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
Darren
I think the client code has to normalize the input. There are methods in the
spatial libraries that will do this - or maybe I wrote them my code, can't
remember. How are you handling parsing the hours?
- Darren
> On Sep 6, 2015, at 4:56 PM, O. Klein wrote:
>
> Saw that, but not
w if you have any other
questions.
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 1:56 PM, O. Klein wrote:
> Darren,
>
> This sounds like solution I'm looking for. Especially nice fix for the
> Sunday-Monday problem.
>
> Never worked with spatial search before, so any pointers are welcome.
>
/display/solr/Spatial+Search
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Darren Spehr wrote:
> Sure - and sorry for its density. I reread it and thought the same ;)
>
> So imagine a polygon of say 1/2 mile width (I made that up) that stretches
> around the equator. Let's call this a week'
6, 2015 at 10:50 AM, Upayavira wrote:
> "delightfully dense" = really intriguing, but I couldn't quite
> understand it - really hoping for more info
>
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2015, at 03:49 PM, Upayavira wrote:
> > Darren,
> >
> > That was delightfully dense. Do
and do a
> spatial search within that time.
>
> If it is now Monday, 11:23am, that would be 11*60+23=683, so you would
> do a search for 683:683.
>
> If you have a shop that is open over Sunday night to Monday, you just
> list it as open until Sunday 23:59 and open again Monday 00:00.
>
> Would that do it?
>
> Upayavira
>
--
Darren
ou'll excuse me, I have a conf review to perform.
Darren
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 6:48 PM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
>
> : I posted a question on stackoverflow but in hindsight this would have
> been
> : a better place to start. Below is the link.
> :
> : Basically I can&#
s-not-proceeding-to-leader-election-on-new-cluster-startup-hangs
Any help and guidance would be appreciated. Thanks!
--
Darren
SSDs.
Thanks again,
Darren
-Original Message-
From: Mark Miller [mailto:markrmil...@gmail.com]
Sent: 22 July 2014 00:25
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: SolrCloud replica dies under high throughput
Looks like you probably have to raise the http client connection pool limits
g? My cluster has 4 nodes (2
shards, 2 replicas) (AWS m3.2xlarge). I am indexing with ~800 concurrent
connections and a 10 sec soft commit. I consistently get this problem with a
throughput of around 1.5 million documents per hour.
Thanks all,
Darren
Stack Traces & Messages:
[qtp779330563-6
point would be much
appreciated.
Thanks all,
Darren
point would be much
appreciated.
Thanks all,
Darren
the trick here?
thanks,
Darren
zookeeper.
You need to push the cfg to zookeeper & link collection to cfg.
This is exactly what mark suggested earlier in the thread. This is also
explained in solr cloud wiki.
On Monday, February 25, 2013, Darren Govoni wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> I download latest zk, and run it.
On 02/24/2013 08:32 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
You either have to specifically upload a config set or use one of the bootstrap
sys props.
Are you doing either?
- Mark
On Feb 24, 2013, at 8:15 PM, Darren Govoni wrote:
Thanks Michael.
I went ahead and just started an external zookeeper, but my
)
... 10 more
On 02/24/2013 07:21 PM, Michael Della Bitta wrote:
Hello Darren,
If you go into the admin and click on Cloud, you'll see that
information represented in a number of ways. Both Dump and Tree
(especially the clusterstate.json file) have this information
represented as a document in
olr 4.x was released, but things
have changed.
tips appreciated. thank you.
Darren
SimpleDateFormat df= new SimpleDateFormat("-MM-dd'T'hh:mm:ss.S'Z'");
Date dateObj = df.parse("2009-10-29T00:00:009Z");
--- Original Message ---
On 1/8/2013 09:34 AM uwe72 wrote:A Lucene 4.0 document returns for a Date
field now a string value, instead of
a Date object.
Solr4.0 --
This should be clarified some. In the "client" API, SolrServer is represents a
connection to a single server backend/endpoint and should be re-used where possible.
The approach being discussed is to have one "client" connection (represented by SolrServer class) per solr core, all residing in a "
low level Lucene index. There is no reason
that needs to alway be that way. It's possible that we may at some point add
built in micro sharding support that means a SolrCore could have multiple
underlying Lucene indexes. Or we may not.
- Mark
On Jan 4, 2013, at 1:49 PM, darren wrote:
Go
, and index
is a pysical lucene term. A collection or a shard is a logical solr
term.
Upayavira
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013, at 06:28 PM, darren wrote:
> My understanding is core is a logical solr term. Index is a physical
> lucene term. A solr core is backed by a physical lucene index. One index
>
indexes in one core?
>
> Regards,
> Alex.
> Personal blog: http://blog.outerthoughts.com/
> LinkedIn:
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/**alexandrerafalovitch<http://www.linkedin.com/in/alexandrerafalovitch>
> - Time is the quality of nature that keeps events from happening all at
> onc
n't seem to be working. (Anonymous - via GTD book)
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 10:11 AM, darren wrote:
> This is the containment hierarchy i understand but includes both physical
> and logical.
>
> Original message
> From: darren
> Date:
> To: dar...@
This is the containment hierarchy i understand but includes both physical and
logical.
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Smartphone
Original message
From: darren
Date:
To: dar...@ontrenet.com,yo...@lucidworks.com,solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Terminology
Actually. Node/collection/shard/replica/core/index
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Smartphone
Original message
From: darren
Date:
To: yo...@lucidworks.com,solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Terminology question: Core vs. Collection vs...
Agreed. But for
Agreed. But for completeness can it be node/collection/shard/replica/core?
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Smartphone
Original message
From: Yonik Seeley
Date:
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Terminology question: Core vs. Collection vs...
On Fri, Jan
@lucene.apache.org,darren
Subject: Re: Terminology question: Core vs. Collection vs...
I thought about adding Solr core, but it only muddies the water. Yes, it
needs to be added, but carefully.
In the context of SolrCloud, a Solr core is the underlying representation of
a replica
This is a good explanation and makes sense. The one inconsistency is referring
to a replica of a shard that has no replication. But its not that big of a
problem. If you wove the term 'core' into your writeup below it would be
complete and should be posted on the wiki.
Sent from my Verizon Wi
, put more of them on a single node and
then migrate them to their own nodes as the data outgrows the smaller
number of nodes. In other words, add nodes incrementally without
having to reindex all the data.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message- From: Darren Govoni
Sent: Thursday, Janua
And based on the previous explanation there is never a "copy of a shard". A
shard represents and contains only replicas for itself, replicas being copies of cores
within the shard.
--- Original Message ---
On 1/3/2013 11:58 AM Walter Underwood wrote:A "factor" is multiplied, so
multip
Great point.
--- Original Message ---
On 1/3/2013 10:42 AM Per Steffensen wrote:On 1/3/13 4:33 PM, Mark Miller
wrote:
> This has pretty much become the standard across other distributed systems
and in the literat…err…books.
Hmmm Im not sure you are right about that. Maybe more than one
---
On 1/3/2013 09:19 AM Jack Krupansky wrote:A single shard MAY exist on a single core, but only if it is not replicated.
Generally, a single shard will exist on multiple cores, each a replica of
the source data as it comes into the update handler.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message--
ctual Solr cores. Replicas are instances of the data for
a shard.
Sometimes people may loosely speak of a replica as being "a shard", but
that's just loose use of the terminology.
So, we're not "sharding shards", but we are "replicating shards".
-- Jack Kru
he terminology.
So, we're not "sharding shards", but we are "replicating shards".
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Darren Govoni
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2013 8:51 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Re: Terminology question: Core vs. Coll
of the terminology.
So, we're not "sharding shards", but we are "replicating shards".
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Darren Govoni
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2013 8:51 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Re: Terminology question: Core
ferent shards on the
same node/box for a partial improvement of performance and fault tolerance.
A Solr "cloud' is really a cluster.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Darren Govoni
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2013 8:16 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Re:
Good write up.
And what about "node"?
I think there needs to be an official glossary of terms that is sanctioned by the solr
team and some terms still ni use may need to be labeled "deprecated". After so
many years, its still confusing.
--- Original Message ---
On 1/3/2013 08:07 AM
There is a ticket for that with some recent activity (sorry I don't have it
handy right now), but I'm not sure if that work made it into the trunk, so
probably solrcloud does not support MLT...yet. Would love an update from the
dev team though!
--- Original Message ---
On 11/5/2012 10
It certainly seems to be a rogue project, but I can't understand the
meaning of "realtime near realtime (NRT)" either. At best, its oxymoronic.
On 10/29/2012 10:30 AM, Jack Krupansky wrote:
Could any of the committers here confirm whether this is a legitimate
effort? I mean, how could anything
I agree it needs updating and I've always gotten confused at some point
by
the use (misuse) of terms.
For example, the term 'node' is thrown around a lot too. What is it??!
Hehe.
On Sat, 2012-09-08 at 22:26 -0700, JesseBuesking wrote:
> It's been a while since the terminology at
> http://wiki.ap
r real time search queries and analytics on it.
> No need to export data around.
>
> Solr4 is becoming a very interesting solution to many web scale problems.
> Just missing the map/reduce component. :)
>
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 3:01 PM, Darren Govoni wrote:
>
> > Of co
Of course you can do it, but the question is whether this will produce
the performance results you expect.
I've seen talk about this in other forums, so you might find some prior
work here.
Solr and HDFS serve somewhat different purposes. The key issue would be
if your map and reduce code
overload
What exactly is "Realtime NRT" (Near Real Time)?
On Sun, 2012-07-22 at 14:07 -0700, Nagendra Nagarajayya wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I am very excited to announce the availability of Solr 4.0-ALPHA with
> RankingAlgorithm 1.4.4 with Realtime NRT. The Realtime NRT
> implementation now supports both Rankin
You'll have to query the index for the fields and sift out the _s ones
and cache them or something.
On Mon, 2012-07-16 at 16:52 +0530, Rajani Maski wrote:
> Yes, This feature will solve the below problem very neatly.
>
> All,
>
> Is there any approach to achieve this for now?
>
>
> --Rajani
I don't think it comes at any added cost for solr to return that facet
so you can filter it
out in your business logic.
On Sat, 2012-07-07 at 15:18 +0530, Shanu Jha wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I am generating facet for a field which has one of the value "NA" and I
> want solr should not create facet
ithm in detail? why it's better than
> > google site(better than lucene is not very interested because lucene
> > is not originally designed to provide search function like google)?
> >
> > On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 1:06 AM, Darren Govoni wrote:
> >> I think people o
become available with Solr 3.6 soon.
>
> Regards,
>
> Nagendra Nagarajayya
> http://solr-ra.tgels.org
> http://rankingalgorithm.tgels.org
>
>
>
> On 5/27/2012 7:32 AM, Darren Govoni wrote:
> > Hi,
> >Have you tested this with a billion docu
Hi,
Have you tested this with a billion documents?
Darren
On Sun, 2012-05-27 at 07:24 -0700, Nagendra Nagarajayya wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I am very excited to announce the availability of Solr 3.6 with
> RankingAlgorithm 1.4.2.
>
> This NRT supports now works with both RankingAl
> Why not using multicore?
>
>
> Marcelo Carvalho Fernandes
> +55 21 8272-7970
>
>
>
> On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Darren Govoni wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > I am running my solrcloud nodes in an app server deployed into the
> > context
Hi,
I am running my solrcloud nodes in an app server deployed into the
context path 'solr' and zookeeper sees all of them. I want to deploy a
second solrcloud war into the same app server (thus same IP:port) in a
different context like 'solrrep' with the same config (cloned).
Will this work? Or d
on in solrcore, but maybe
there's a good reason you want to do it this way.
--- Original Message ---
On 5/22/2012 07:35 AM Yandong Yao wrote:Hi Darren,
Thanks very much for your reply.
The reason I want to control core indexing/searching is that I want to
use one core to store one
Why do you want to control what gets indexed into a core and then
knowing what core to search? That's the kind of "knowing" that SolrCloud
solves. In SolrCloud, it handles the distribution of documents across
shards and retrieves them regardless of which node is searched from.
That is the point of
The thought here is to distribute a search between two different
solrcloud clusters and get ordered ranked results between them.
It's possible?
On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 18:47 -0400, Darren Govoni wrote:
> Hi,
> Would distributed search (the old way where you provide the solr host
Hi,
Would distributed search (the old way where you provide the solr host
IP's etc.) still work between different solrclouds?
thanks,
Darren
Was there a response to this?
On Fri, 2012-05-04 at 10:27 -0400, Keswani, Nitin - BLS CTR wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My data model consist of different types of data. Each data type has its own
> characteristics
>
> If I include the unique characteristics of each type of data, my single Solr
> Document
I'm also interested in this. Same situation.
On Fri, 2012-05-04 at 10:27 -0400, Keswani, Nitin - BLS CTR wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My data model consist of different types of data. Each data type has its own
> characteristics
>
> If I include the unique characteristics of each type of data, my single So
You could run the MLT for the document in question, then gather all
those doc id's in the MLT results and negate those in a subsequent
query. Not sure how robust that would work with very large result sets,
but something to try.
Another approach would be to gather the "interesting terms" from the
he other replicas.
>
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 7:54 AM, Darren Govoni wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I just wanted to make sure I understand how distributed indexing works
> > in solrcloud.
> >
> > Can I index locally at each shard to avoid throttling a central port? Or
Hi,
I just wanted to make sure I understand how distributed indexing works
in solrcloud.
Can I index locally at each shard to avoid throttling a central port? Or
all the indexing has to go through a single shard leader?
thanks
exactly what PathHierarchyTokenizer does.
> > > positionIncrementGap="100">
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I think I have a query time tokenizer that tokenizes at /
> >
> > ?q=colors:red
> > ==&
Put the parent term in all the child documents at index time
and the re-issue the facet query when you expand the parent using the
parent's term. works perfect.
On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 10:56 -0400, sam ” wrote:
> I have hierarchical colors:
> stored="true" multiValued="true"/>
> text_path is TextFi
Can you be more specific about "health"?
On Sat, 2012-04-14 at 00:03 -0400, Jamie Johnson wrote:
> How do people currently monitor the health of a solr cluster? Are
> there any good tools which can show the health across the entire
> cluster? Is this something which is planned for the new admin
Yes
--- Original Message ---
On 4/13/2012 06:25 AM Benson Margulies wrote:A discussion over on the dev
list led me to expect that the by-if
field retrievals in a SolrCloud query would come through the get
handler. In fact, I've seen them turn up in my search component in the
search hand
Solrcloud or any other tech specific replication isnt going to 'just work' with
hadoop replication. But with some significant custom coding anything should be
possible. Interesting idea.
br>--- Original Message ---
On 4/12/2012 09:21 AM Ali S Kureishy wrote:Thanks Darren.
You could use SolrCloud (for the automatic scaling) and just mount a
fuse[1] HDFS directory and configure solr to use that directory for its
data.
[1] https://ccp.cloudera.com/display/CDHDOC/Mountable+HDFS
On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 16:04 +0300, Ali S Kureishy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to setup a
Hard to say why its not working for you. Start with a fresh Solr and
work forward from there or back out your configs and plugins until it
works again.
On Tue, 2012-04-10 at 17:15 -0400, Benson Margulies wrote:
> In my cloud configuration, if I push
>
>
> *:*
>
>
> followed by:
>
>
>
> I
My first reaction to your question is why are you running thousands of queries
in a loop? Immediately, I think this will not scale well and the design
probably needs to be re-visited.
Second, if you need that many requests, then you need to seriously consider an
architecture that supports it.
Your handler for that field should be looked at.
Try not using a handler that tokenizes or stems the field.
You want to leave the text as is. I forget the handler setting for that,
but its documented in there somewhere.
On Mon, 2012-04-09 at 13:02 -0700, Thiago wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> I've
"...it is a distributed real-time query scheme..."
SolrCloud does this already. It treats all the shards like one-big-index, and you can
query it normally to get "subset" results from each shard. Why do you have to
re-write the query for each shard? Seems unnecessary.
--- Original Message
In my opinion, its never a good idea to overwrite files of a previous
version with a new version.
The easiest thing would be to just deploy the solr war file into tomcat
and let tomcat manage the webapp, files, etc.
On Sat, 2012-04-07 at 22:39 -0400, Dan Foley wrote:
> I have download the nightl
Now, it comes up. Not sure why its acting weird. Will continue to look
at it.
On Sat, 2012-04-07 at 10:23 -0400, Darren Govoni wrote:
> K. There is a solr.war in the webapps directory. But still get the 404.
>
> On Sat, 2012-04-07 at 16:19 +0200, Rafał Kuć wrote:
> > Hello!
>
K. There is a solr.war in the webapps directory. But still get the 404.
On Sat, 2012-04-07 at 16:19 +0200, Rafał Kuć wrote:
> Hello!
>
> start.jar shouldn't contain any webapp. If you look at the 'example'
> directory, you'll notice that there is a 'webapps' directory which
> should contain solr.
Yep. I did all kinds of ant clean, ant dist, ant example, etc.
My trunk rev.
At revision 1310773.
Example start.jar is broken. No webapp inside. :(
On Sat, 2012-04-07 at 16:11 +0200, Rafał Kuć wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Did you run 'ant example' ?
>
start.jar has no apps in it at all.
On Sat, 2012-04-07 at 09:47 -0400, Darren Govoni wrote:
> HTTP ERROR: 404
> Problem accessing /solr. Reason:
>
> Not Found
>
>
>
> Powered by Jetty://
>
&g
;
> On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 8:23 AM, Darren Govoni wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Just updated solr trunk and tried the java -jar start.jar and
> > localhost:8983/solr/admin.not found.
> >
> > Where did it go?
> >
> > thanks.
> >
>
Hi,
Just updated solr trunk and tried the java -jar start.jar and
localhost:8983/solr/admin.not found.
Where did it go?
thanks.
Try using Luke to look at your index and see if there are multiple
similar TFV's. You can browse them easily in Luke.
On Wed, 2012-04-04 at 23:35 -0400, Jamie Johnson wrote:
> I am currently indexing some information and am wondering why I am
> getting duplicates in facets. From what I can tell t
No one knows. But if you ask the devs, they will say 'when its done'.
One clue might be to monitor the bugs/issues scheduled for 4.0. When
they are all resolved, then its ready.
On Wed, 2012-04-04 at 09:41 -0700, srinivas konchada wrote:
> Hello every one
> Does any one know when Solr 4.0 will be
nd what to do with it.
On Thu, 2012-03-29 at 16:29 -0300, Tomás Fernández Löbbe wrote:
> Can't you simply calculate that at index time and assign the result to a
> field, then sort by that field.
>
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 12:07 PM, Darren Govoni wrote:
>
> > I
I'm going to try index time per-field boosting and do the boost
computation at index time and see if that helps.
On Thu, 2012-03-29 at 10:08 -0400, Darren Govoni wrote:
> Hi,
> I have a situation I want to re-score document relevance.
>
> Let's say I have two fields:
>
Hi,
I have a situation I want to re-score document relevance.
Let's say I have two fields:
text: The quick brown fox jumped over the white fence.
terms: fox fence
Now my queries come in as:
terms:[* TO *]
and Solr scores them on that field.
What I want is to rank them according to the distr
Ok, I'll do what I can to help!
As always, appreciate the hard work Mark.
On Thu, 2012-03-22 at 17:31 -0400, Mark Miller wrote:
> On Mar 22, 2012, at 5:22 PM, Darren Govoni wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > It was mentioned before that SolrCloud has all the capability of
>
x27;m happy to help anyway possible.
thanks,
Darren
at doesn't really make sense to do at the Solr/Lucene level. All
you're saying is that you want that field highlighted. Wouldn't it be much
easier to just do this at the app level whenever your field had anything
returned in it?
Best
Erick
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Darren Govoni
I think he's asking if all the nodes (same machine or not) return a
response. Presumably you have different ports for each node since they
are on the same machine.
On Sun, 2012-03-18 at 14:44 -0400, Matthew Parker wrote:
> The cluster is running on one machine.
>
> On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 2:07 PM
Thanks for the tip Hoss.
I notice that it appears sometimes and was varying because my index runs
would sometimes have different amount of docs, etc.
So all I want to do is a simple "all docs with something in this field,
and to highlight the field".
Is the query expansion to "all possible term
As a rule of thumb, many will say not to go to production with a pre-release baseline. So until
Solr4 goes "final" and "stable", it's best not to assume too much about it.
Second suggestion is to properly stage new technologies in your product such
that they go through their own validation. And
What I think was mentioned on this a bit ago is that the index stops
working if one of the "nodes" goes down unless its a replica.
You have 2 "nodes" running with numShards=2? Thus if one goes down the
entire index is inoperable. In the future I'm hoping this changes such
that the index cluster co
A question relating to this.
If you are running a single ZK node, but say 10 other nodes and then
parallel index on each of those nodes, will the ZK be hit by all 10
indexing nodes constantly? i.e. very chatty?
If one of those 10 indexing nodes goes down or falls out of sync and comes
back, does
> And did you do an 'ant clean'?
>
> It works on my machine with a fresh pull this morning.
>
> Best
> Erick
>
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 5:27 PM, Darren Govoni
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I am getting numerous errors preventing a build of solrclo
Hi,
I am getting numerous errors preventing a build of solrcloud trunk.
[licenses] MISSING LICENSE for the following file:
Any tips to get a clean build working?
thanks
Hi,
I am suddenly getting a maxClauseCount exception for no reason. I am
using Solr 3.5. I have only 206 documents in my index.
Any ideas? This is wierd.
QUERY PARAMS: [hl, hl.snippets, hl.simple.pre, hl.simple.post, fl,
hl.mergeContiguous, hl.usePhraseHighlighter, hl.requireFieldMatch,
echoPar
Hi,
I am suddenly getting a maxclause count error and don't know why. I am
using Solr 3.5
Hi,
Which is faster for boolean compound expressions. filter queries or a
single query with boolean expressions?
For that matter, is there any difference other than maybe speed?
thanks
Thanks Mark. Is there any plan to make all the Solr search handlers work
with SolrCloud, like MLT? That missing feature would prohibit us from
using SolrCloud at the moment. :(
On Sat, 2012-02-11 at 18:24 -0500, Mark Miller wrote:
> On Feb 11, 2012, at 6:02 PM, Darren Govoni wrote:
>
Hi,
Do all the normal facilities of Solr work with SolrCloud from SolrJ?
Things like /mlt, /cluster, facets , tvf's, etc.
Darren
Double check your default operator for a faceted search vs. regular
search. I caught this difference in my work that explained this
difference.
On Fri, 2012-02-10 at 07:45 -0800, Yuhao wrote:
> Jay,
>
> Was the curly closing bracket "}" intentional? I'm using 3.4, which also
> supports "fq=pric
Good job on this work. A monumental effort.
On Wed, 8 Feb 2012 16:41:13 -0500, Mark Miller
wrote:
> For those that are interested and have not noticed, the latest work on
> SolrCloud and distributed indexing is now in trunk.
>
> SolrCloud is our name for a new set of distributed capabilities th
1 - 100 of 255 matches
Mail list logo
