Gentlemen,
Quit bringing your extreme nationalism to the discussion. The map
should be useful to the local people. There are two official languages
in Kosovo, Albanian and Serbian. Other languages can be used locally
when at least 5% of the population uses them.
I hope you stick to this.
Forwarding this mail to the list for further discussion.
-- Forwarded message --
From: maning sambale emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 12:00 PM
Subject: Re: towns and inter-town roads
Dear Ed and everyone,
I actually proposed this naming scheme for national
Hi,
I want to announce another informal meeting in STUK Leuven on January 6th
2012.
Topics we might discuss:
JOSM, introduction (for newbies) and advanced uses like
- How to reassign shortcut keys
- How to work with photos in combination with GPX tracks
- How to put emphasis on the
I will try to make it to Leuven this time!
Maybe the licence change and how to handle it in an organized manner could
be dicussed as well?
Does someone have an idea of the (inactive)users that still need to be
contacted regarding the licence change? There are a few users with a huge
amount of
I won't be able to make it. The exams will be rather close on January 6.
But would it be possible to make a little report on it? Certainly on the
license change things?
Regards,
Sander
Op 14 dec. 2011 10:53 schreef Ben Abelshausen ben.abelshau...@gmail.com
het volgende:
I will try to make it
At least one week later would also be better for me, as I'm away for Christmas.
Cheers,
Jw
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 11:47, Jo winfi...@gmail.com wrote:
What about one week later? The date is not set in stone.
Jo
2011/12/14 Ben Abelshausen ben.abelshau...@gmail.com
Now that Sander mentions
I have exams until February 3 I believe, so one week would not be enough
for me.
But I don't mind if you do it without me.
Op 14 dec. 2011 11:47 schreef Jo winfi...@gmail.com het volgende:
What about one week later? The date is not set in stone.
Jo
2011/12/14 Ben Abelshausen
Hello, new user here. How can I accept the new license? Thanks a lot.
No exams here, so the date does not matter.
WB
Op 14-dec.-2011 om 12:59 heeft Jo winfi...@gmail.com het volgende geschreven:
We can have a meeting like this every month anyway, but I'm going to postpone
it one week. I'm
Depends how you define new but recent users should already have accepted
when creating their account. You can see the status on your 'user' page
under *Contributor terms*
Here is mine: http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Ben Abelshausen
oh and welcome to OSM! :-)
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 1:13 PM,
Sorry but Frederik and my numbers (odbl.poole.ch) are compatible
(odbl.de naturally not, RTFM). Just because some areas look like a big
red blob, doesn't mean that are lot of useful (ie non-imported) data is
being lost, look at Spain for example.
Simon
Am 14.12.2011 02:12, schrieb Jo:
The
I suggest the OSM heat map http://yosmhm.neis-one.org/ for personalizing
your message.
I also tried looking for their nick on Google, because many people use the
same nick on several services.
Janko Mihelić
2011/12/14 Tobias Knerr o...@tobias-knerr.de
David Earl wrote:
When writing the
On 14/12/2011 02:49, Tobias Knerr wrote:
When writing the mails, I put some effort into personalizing the mail
for the recipient by looking at their user and edits page on osm.org.
Writing in the user's native language also helps a lot. When the user
has no personal page on the wiki, looking
I was looking at the map that showed contributions from those who hadn't
agreed to the new terms. One section I found interesting since I knew I'd
mapped it first from a GPS trace I'd made but looking through the history I
noticed another name before mine who hadn't agreed to the new terms.
I
Frederik Ramm frederik at remote.org writes:
Hi,
apologies if this is the 2nd or 3rd time you're reading this, I have
posted to dev and legal-talk yesterday in the hope that any major bugs
could be ironed out before I announce this to a wider audience.
I have added a world-wide
Yes.
There are a large number of situations were depending on
- sequence of edit operations
- intermediate upload and generation of new object ids
you will get different owners of objects.
This is why it is highly likely that split and mergers will not be
taken in to account in any automatic
Two requests to help us prioritize our work:
When I receive e-mail via the OSM e-mail system, I also receive a message from
my real e-mail account (my ISP) that a message has arrived at my OSM account.
When the effort was made to contact all users who had not (as of that time)
agreed to the
Am 14.12.2011 14:08, schrieb Hillsman, Edward:
Two requests to help us prioritize our work:
.
Right now we are remapping and contacting in the dark. Bad customer service is We are
changing things, you deal with it. Good customer service is We need to make some
changes, we
Edward Hillsman wrote:
that Potlatch does not highlight everything that even the OSM
Inspector designates as being at risk of removal or reversion
(giving false positives and false negatives; I have identified
one of each in the area I map)
Potlatch 2 uses exactly the same source as OSM
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 8:23 AM, Simon Poole si...@poole.ch wrote:
Am 14.12.2011 14:08, schrieb Hillsman, Edward:
Two requests to help us prioritize our work:
.
Right now we are remapping and contacting in the dark. Bad customer
service is We are changing things, you deal
Doesn't make any difference to the CTs, but I've noticed but I'm not the first
named author of a few ways which I'm 99.99% sure that I created: the ways with
the ID 2232-2235. I still remember the surveying/editing session in which I
created the ways.
These were very early ways (spring 2006)
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Nick Whitelegg nick.whitel...@solent.ac.uk
wrote:
Doesn't make any difference to the CTs, but I've noticed but I'm not the
first named author of a few ways which I'm 99.99% sure that I created: the
ways with the ID 2232-2235. I still remember the
Thank you, its nice to know these things. Fun stuff.
Cheerio John
On 14 December 2011 11:31, 80n 80n...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Nick Whitelegg
nick.whitel...@solent.ac.uk wrote:
Doesn't make any difference to the CTs, but I've noticed but I'm not the
first
So essentially all data that existed on this date will need to be deleted
since we can't be sure who entered or edited it or if they have agreed to
the new license if the .odbl database is to be clean.
Cheerio John
On 14 December 2011 11:31, 80n 80n...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 1:15 PM, john whelan jwhelan0...@gmail.com wrote:
So essentially all data that existed on this date will need to be deleted
since we can't be sure who entered or edited it or if they have agreed to
the new license if the .odbl database is to be clean.
That's quite a
- Original Message -
From: Richard Weait rich...@weait.com
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2011 6:32 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Who mapped it first with ref to forth coming
deletions - implication
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 1:15 PM, john whelan
The other thing that's needed is a way to mark an object as clean. For
example, if a red mapper added name=Citgo to an existing gas station,
and I verify that it's Citgo (and maybe add other tags such as address),
how do I prevent the OSMF from reverting it?
On 14-12-2011 19:32, Richard Weait wrote:
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 1:15 PM, john whelanjwhelan0...@gmail.com wrote:
So essentially all data that existed on this date will need to be deleted
since we can't be sure who entered or edited it or if they have agreed to
the new license if the .odbl
Maarten Deen wrote:
Well, since all history of that data before API v0.5 is lost
Hey hey hey. Slow down.
Data before API 0.5 is _not_ lost. It is archived.
cheers
Richard
--
View this message in context:
On 14 December 2011 20:14, Maarten Deen md...@xs4all.nl wrote:
On 14-12-2011 19:32, Richard Weait wrote:
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 1:15 PM, john whelanjwhelan0...@gmail.com
wrote:
So essentially all data that existed on this date will need to be deleted
since we can't be sure who entered or
I didn't even know that GMM had introduced peer reviewed edits,
apparently they did so a while ago. 'Review some contributions and get
yours reviewed faster' is what it told me when I logged in.
And now they overhauled the UI to make it that much easier to contribute.
We're definitely losing
On 14-12-2011 20:32, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
Maarten Deen wrote:
Well, since all history of that data before API v0.5 is lost
Hey hey hey. Slow down.
Data before API 0.5 is _not_ lost. It is archived.
That is something different than what 80n said earlier, quoting a
message from Frederik
Maarten Deen wrote:
That is something different than what 80n said earlier
80n, not for the first time, is wrong.
So, which is it? Cleared and no details about any previous
modifications or archived and earlier details available?
You have to excuse the confusion, because these are
I recently updated JOSM to the latest tested (though it still has the
sluggishness issues I reported a few months ago) and can no longer
download from the Overpass API. When I try to download
On 12/14/2011 4:13 PM, Stefan de Konink wrote:
Could you point on the wiki which problems will arise by not changing
at all - or posing a future transition to a next version of the
Creative Commons license?
I've read through many discussions, and the only reasons I've seen for
changing the
Martijn van Exel wrote:
We're definitely losing (potential) mappers to GMM. I don't have to
tell you that's a shame -- all that effort going into creating
non-free data. But how do we divert some of that energy to OSM?
Well, let's ask a Map Maker user:
On Dec 14, 2011, at 1:48 PM, Tobias Knerr wrote:
Martijn van Exel wrote:
We're definitely losing (potential) mappers to GMM. I don't have to
tell you that's a shame -- all that effort going into creating
non-free data. But how do we divert some of that energy to OSM?
Well, let's ask a Map
I will look at a single suburban roadway: Westwood Boulevard in the
International Drive tourist area south of Orlando.
This started out as a TIGER way:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/11197961/history
80n (orange) and kyrbyboy (red) have made some improvements to
alignment, but have
Hi,
On 12/15/2011 02:58 AM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
So what here will be reverted by the OSMF? Obviously node 250413743
needs to be replaced by another node in the same general location. But
other than that, is everything tainted because it was split from a
tainted way? Or is nothing else
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 1:21 PM, pec...@gmail.com pec...@gmail.com wrote:
2011. gada 14. decembris 21:57 Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org rakstīja:
I didn't even know that GMM had introduced peer reviewed edits,
apparently they did so a while ago. 'Review some contributions and get
yours
From: Toby Murray toby.mur...@gmail.com
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Friday, December 2, 2011 5:03 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Friends
One thing I have thought might not be too hard to code up and provide
some use would be to have a Recent edits by my
On 12/14/2011 9:45 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
It has been explained already but I'll repeat it - OSMF/LWG has not yet
decided what they will do with regards to the finer points of complex
object relicensing. This means that none of your questions above has an
answer. And OSMF is not going to
Tobias Knerr writes:
For people who are primarily motivated by applications they can use
today, rather than the potential for future applications, we're just not
that attractive - at least as far as mainstream applications are
concerned.
OSMAnd. Offline vector maps. Google Maps can't
Nathan Edgars II writes:
I've read through many discussions, and the only reasons I've seen for
changing the license ASAP are based on the fear of someone ripping off
our work and our being powerless to do anything.
That is my understanding as well. I've been against relicensing from
the
Yeah, a healthy chunk of the interstates in Kansas are the same way. I
didn't go quite as deep as Nathan but this way is a relevant example:
http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=33576021
User moonwashed created this way by splitting it from a TIGER way.
He made several more edits to it but the
It seems every six months or so, a new set of license troll
discussions come up.
It's the same people. I can name names if necessary, but I think the
old timers mostly know who the trolls are by now.
They suck energy from the lists, they suck energy from the projects.
They criticize the process,
How do I +1 a mailing list post??
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Serge Wroclawski emac...@gmail.com wrote:
It seems every six months or so, a new set of license troll
discussions come up.
It's the same people. I can name names if necessary, but I think the
old timers mostly know who the
On 12/14/2011 11:56 PM, Serge Wroclawski wrote:
3. The list moderators need to step up and do their jobs. This
nonsense is disruptive and it needs to end. Discussion is fine, but
inflammatory language and lies are not.
Could you have made a more inflammatory post?
(Well, sure, you could have,
On Wed, 14 Dec 2011 23:56:01 -0500
Serge Wroclawski emac...@gmail.com wrote:
It seems every six months or so, a new set of license troll
discussions come up.
It's the same people. I can name names if necessary, but I think the
old timers mostly know who the trolls are by now.
They suck
Serge Wroclawski writes:
It seems every six months or so, a new set of license troll
discussions come up.
I wasn't trolling. You are. Stop it.
--
--my blog is athttp://blog.russnelson.com
Crynwr supports open source software
521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315-600-8815
Potsdam, NY
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 9:35 PM, Russ Nelson nel...@crynwr.com wrote:
OSMAnd. Offline vector maps. Google Maps can't touch that.
+1
Especially with the OsmAnd update I got from the Android market a few
days ago. Offline vector rendering was functional before. Now it's
downright beautiful.
On
The Google maps app, via a labs add on, allows you to download offline
vector maps! Okay they are only 10sq mi each and you are limited to 10 of
them but its still possible.
Kev
On Dec 15, 2011 3:39 AM, Russ Nelson nel...@crynwr.com wrote:
Tobias Knerr writes:
For people who are primarily
Hi,
On 12/15/2011 03:45 AM, Martijn van Exel wrote:
innovating
leveraged
gamification (GMM has 'superstar mappers' I believe)
leverage
I think you're reading too much off the blurby stuff ;)
Thing is: Google has a gazillion more $$$ than we do, and they can buy
all of Peru to do UI work for
Hallo,
Weet iemand wat er aan de hand is met de server
http://tile.openstreetmap.nl vanaf zoom 12 worden de tiles op de
achtergrond gerenderd.
Alvast bedankt voor het kijken naar het probleem.
Groeten,
Peter
___
Talk-nl mailing list
On Wed, 14 Dec 2011, Peter Peterse wrote:
Weet iemand wat er aan de hand is met de server
http://tile.openstreetmap.nl vanaf zoom 12 worden de tiles op de
achtergrond gerenderd.
Alvast bedankt voor het kijken naar het probleem.
Ik kan alvast vertellen dat renderd niet meer draait.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Op 14-12-11 16:21, Peter Peterse schreef:
bedankt, wie kan hier naar kijken. Enige tijd geleden was dit ook
al het geval. Is het een onstabiel proces dat renderd?
Mapnik lekt geheugen, en zover ik kon zien stond het al in een
automatisch herstart
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Het onderwerp draagt deze hele e-mail.
Zoals jullie inmiddels weten is er een bron van 'open data' dat van
vervoerders afkomt, maar niet in een staat is van 'alwetend' en zeker
fouten bevat.
Wat zouden jullie het liefste willen, iets wat kan
de rechter staat vrijgave van het NWB toe en wijst niet alleen het
spoedeisende belang af (dat was makkelijk geweest) maar legt ook uit
waarom het inhoudelijk niet waarschijnlijk is dat het vrijgeven van het
NWB verboden is:
2011/12/15 dbuss...@goudappel.nl:
de rechter staat vrijgave van het NWB toe en wijst niet alleen het
spoedeisende belang af (dat was makkelijk geweest) maar legt ook uit waarom
het inhoudelijk niet waarschijnlijk is dat het vrijgeven van het NWB
verboden is:
Dat is goed nieuws!
Christ van
Collega's,
Floris schreef: Stefan is niet akkoord met de CT en ik verwacht ook niet
dat dat nog gaat gebeuren :) Onder andere door het importeren van data op
z'n eigen account is dit waarschijnlijk niet eens een optie.
Ik heb nog eens in een PM wat vragen aan Stefan gesteld. Hier mijn
On 10/12/11 21:11, Sam Couter wrote:
Many urban residential roads have speed limits of 60 or maybe
70km/h. I think rural roads with moderately dense residential acre
blocks and 80km/h speed limits are still residential, unless they're
also the main route to a neighbouring town, in which case
On 11/12/11 08:35, Sam Couter wrote:
In the ACT 50km/h is the default if there are no signs.
I know that's what the road signs say as you enter the ACT. It's also
repeated on official ACT government web sites.
But it's an over-simplification.
The ACT version of the Australian Road Rules
As time and opportunity arises, I've started re-entering rural roads
where it's clear that the original is scheduled for deletion. I'm
deleting the old way completely, and re-entering it from GPS data I'm
gathering.
JOSM now has a License Check plugin to identify potential deletions,
bringing
That's fine so long as you are not transferring any tags from the
original way.
See Frederik's comments to NE2 re this, on the osm-talk list.
Mind you, you've got a lot to do in AU.
Cheers
Ross
On 14/12/11 13:56, John Henderson wrote:
As time and opportunity arises, I've started
around -37.932622, 145.1560615
can somebody familiar with the area make this into a sensible junction?
Frank
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
On 15/12/11 02:15, Ross Scanlon wrote:
That's fine so long as you are not transferring any tags from the
original way.
Yes, and that's why I'm trying not to reuse any original nodes. I
imagine a lot of corners and other detail is going to disappear from
some ways which remain (as I interpret
Hi John,
For towns that I have completely suryeyed, I will be remapping roads, as
necessary to ensure that my survey work is not lost to the project.
These roads will be completely replaced by my original data, maybe with
some help from Bing imagery where it will help
improve the accuracy of my
Hi.
I think it's clear we need an automated way to remove non-new-ct-accepting
edits from ways where v1 was by an acceptor.
Even assuming the trace data is in OSM there is still an immense amount of
work needed to cleanse these ways.
- Ben Kelley.
Problem with this is that you are breaching copyright.
This is the same as what the user did with the data in Sydney and it was
removed by the data working group.
It's also what Frederik was discussing on the talk list in regards
to NE2.
You are not resolving the issue of the original data
No I'm not. I think you may be misunderstanding what I am doing.
If the v1 object author has agreed to the CTs, but the v2 author has not, I
simply delete the object, load the v1 object directly, make my changes,
link the object and attribute the v1 author using the attribution tag.
No
Only if v1 is from a non-acceptor. I assumed from Ian's post that v1
is from an acceptor. (Or have I read that wrong?)
Quoting Ross Scanlon i...@4x4falcon.com:
Problem with this is that you are breaching copyright.
Cheers
Ross
On 15/12/11 12:34, Ian Sergeant wrote:
For a couple of objects,
Manuel Reimer Manuel.Spam at nurfuerspam.de writes:
Mittlerweile habe ich Antwort erhalten. Die E-Mail hängt im Original an
diesem Posting.
Aus irgendeinem Grund hat gmane nicht nur mein Attachment sondern auch meine
zweite Mail (hatte den Mailinhalt der Mail von der Vermessungsverwaltung in
Wenn dein GPS Device intelligent loggen kann, dann mach es. Ein Punkt
pro Sekunde ist meist vom Ergebnis deutlich schlechter wie ein
intelligentes vermeiden zu vielen Punkte - vor allem da dein Device dann
da die internen Qualitätsdaten noch vorhanden sind, Outlier
rausschmeißen kann.
Guten Tag zusammen!
Ich habe drei Fragen an die OSM-Community:
1. Kann man eine Aussage darüber treffen, wie vollständig die
Straßendaten für die Stadt Köln zum aktuellen Zeitpunkt sind? Mich
interessiert vor allem, inwieweit alle Straßen grundsätzlich vorhanden
sind. Eine aufs Prozent genaue
Hi.
Beim Key weiß ichs nicht, beim value bin ich mir nicht sicher.
Mir fielen die Öffnungszeiten etc. ein:
Tu durch Th ersetzt = inhaltliche Änderung und Werk(?)
Wr durch We ersetzt = Tippfehlerkorrektur und kein Werk(?)
Bei den Tags könnte man überlegen, ob man solche Ähnlichkeiten testweise
Wie steht es mit Objekten, die vom Benutzer 0 angelegt wurden (z.B. hier
http://wtfe.gryph.de/harmless/way/5200472)? Dieser Benutzer wird ja als
ct denier geführt.
Gruß,
Andreas
On 13.12.2011 17:28, Frederik Ramm wrote:
(...)
Sieht mir nach einem Fehler aus. Solche Aenderungen sollten als
Am 14.12.2011 08:22, schrieb Georg Feddern:
Die von Martin angesprochenen bestimmten Anwendungsfälle erfordern
allerdings auch unter entsprechenden Anwendungsfällen
aufgezeichnete
Tracks - meine Mapping-Praxis weicht dazu doch zu sehr vom
Verkehrsfluss ab, mehr als ich war mal da bieten sie
Das dürfte wohl ein anonymer Mapper gewesen sein. Frederik hat eine
Liste der
Changesets solcher Benutzer bekommen (anonym natürlich) die OK sind und
anscheinend auch solche die abgelehnt haben (nur Spekulation meinerseits).
Simon
Am 14.12.2011 10:56, schrieb Andreas Braunmiller:
Wie steht
Felix Hartmann extremecarver at gmail.com writes:
Wenn dein GPS Device intelligent loggen kann, dann mach es.
Kann es nicht.
Gerade wer ein Garmin hat (weil weit verbreitet) errreicht mit
Aufzeichnungsintervall automatisch / Datendichte am höchsten deutlich
bessere Ergebnisse wie bei
Hallo Marian,
zu 1. Köln konkret.
in meiner Straßenlistenauswertung habe ich leider nur Bonn und Leverkusen
[1]. Der frühere Straßenlistenauswerter, Florian Lohoff, hatte alle
Gemeinden und Städte NRWs, hat mir die Daten aber leider nicht übergeben,
obwohl von ihm und anderen für OSM
Hallo,
Der frühere Straßenlistenauswerter, Florian Lohoff, hatte alle
Gemeinden und Städte NRWs, hat mir die Daten aber leider nicht übergeben,
obwohl von ihm und anderen für OSM zusammengetragen.
Hat er dir damals nicht die Daten versprochen? Ich finde es ehrlich
gesagt keine feine Art, da
Am 14.12.2011 00:22, schrieb Frederik Ramm:
Fallen Euch Beispiele ein, bei dem das Austauschen eines Keys ein echtes
Werk sein koennte?
Bei highway=* und andere main tags auf jeden Fall. Wenn z.B.
highway=unclassified (vom Luftbild abgemalt) in highway=residential
geändert wurde (weil
Hallo,
On 12/14/11 11:17, Simon Poole wrote:
Das dürfte wohl ein anonymer Mapper gewesen sein. Frederik hat eine
Liste der
Changesets solcher Benutzer bekommen (anonym natürlich) die OK sind und
anscheinend auch solche die abgelehnt haben (nur Spekulation meinerseits).
Nur die, die OK sind;
Georg Feddern osm at bavarianmallet.de writes:
Ich bereinige mit RouteConverter grundsätzlich auf 1 m Abstand, um die
angesprochenen Punktwolken zu beseitigen.
Punktewolken lösche ich manuell raus.
Die von Martin angesprochenen bestimmten Anwendungsfälle erfordern
allerdings auch unter
Beispiel:
version 1: user1 (Zustimmer) erste Version
higway=residental
version 2: user2 (Ablehner)
oneway=yes
version 3: user3 (Zustimmer)
name=Ortsstraße
version 4: user4 (Zustimmer)
surface=paved
version 5: user5 (Zustimmer)
width=6
version 6: user6 (Zustimmer)
Am 13.12.2011 16:35, schrieb Frederik Ramm:
In einem Fall, in dem Nichtzustimmer A einen Way mit 50 Nodes anlegt und
Zustimmer B den dann aufsplittet in zwei, wird der OSMI nur die eine
Haelfte des Ways rot einmalen und die andere fuer sauber halten; in
diesem Fall erkennt man aber an den
Ich muss grad grinsen. Ob das wirklich ein Werk im juristischen Sinne
darstellt wenn jemand zu einem Way ein oneyway=yes hinzufügt !?
Aber gut, die Telekom durfte das magenta-T auch als Ihr Eigentum
schützen lassen.
;-)
Muss auch grinsen, wenn ich das schreibe. Komme mir schon vor, wie einer
Hallo Benni,
ja, hat er versprochen, aber es kam dann nichts von ihm.
Ich habe ihm 4 oder 5mal eine Mail geschrieben. Keine Antwort von ihm. Die
Mailadresse ist wohl noch aktiv, er postet ab und zu damit und frühere hatte
ich über diese auch Kontakt zu ihm.
Danach habe ich die Sache mit einem
Erst mal Danke für die Antwort! Kommentare siehe inline.
Am 14. Dezember 2011 11:25 schrieb Dietmar ostr...@diesei.de:
Hallo Marian,
zu 1. Köln konkret.
in meiner Straßenlistenauswertung habe ich leider nur Bonn und Leverkusen
[1]. Der frühere Straßenlistenauswerter, Florian Lohoff, hatte
Tobias Hobmeier writes:
Am 14.12.2011 08:22, schrieb Georg Feddern:
Verkehrsfluss ab, mehr als ich war mal da bieten sie nicht an
sinnvoller Information. Allein aus dem Grund lade ich sie auch als
Privat hoch, damit sie nicht irrtümlich Verkehrsfluss-Analysen
Vorsicht! Es gibt keine privaten
Hallo Marian,
Marian Steinbach schrieb am: Mittwoch, 14. Dezember 2011 12:07
Heißt das, du wärst auch an dieser Liste interessiert? Das wäre ein
Stück mehr Motivation, mich darum zu bemühen.
Klar, immer her damit. Du kannst soviele Straßenlisten aus Deiner Gegend
anbringen, wie Du willst,
Frederik Ramm writes:
On 12/14/11 11:17, Simon Poole wrote:
Das dürfte wohl ein anonymer Mapper gewesen sein. Frederik hat eine
Liste der
Changesets solcher Benutzer bekommen (anonym natürlich) die OK sind und
anscheinend auch solche die abgelehnt haben (nur Spekulation
meinerseits).
Nur
Moin
Ich schick Dir mal das poly-file von Köln, dann kannst Du Köln mit
Osmosis ausschneiden.
osmosis --read-xml file=koeln.osm --bp file=koeln.poly --write-xml
file=koeln_stadt.osm
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Klaus
PGP-Key: E7701DCF
Am Mittwoch, den 14.12.2011, 09:32 +0100 schrieb Marian
Am 14. Dezember 2011 12:43 schrieb Klaus-Hermann Otto Stanislaus Plöger
k.ploe...@gastradata.de:
**
Moin
Ich schick Dir mal das poly-file von Köln, dann kannst Du Köln mit Osmosis
ausschneiden.
osmosis --read-xml file=koeln.osm --bp file=koeln.poly --write-xml
file=koeln_stadt.osm
Ja
Am 14.12.2011 11:43, schrieb Chris66:
Ich muss grad grinsen. Ob das wirklich ein Werk im juristischen Sinne
darstellt wenn jemand zu einem Way ein oneyway=yes hinzufügt !?
Aber gut, die Telekom durfte das magenta-T auch als Ihr Eigentum
schützen lassen.
;-)
Der Scherz ist mir schon klar,
Stephan ... habe die Lösung schon vor Wochen vorgeschlagen (als die
ganze Problematik
überhaupt hochkam). Die Begeisterung hielt sich (sehr) in Grenzen.
Die Liste der changesets die OK sind findest du hier:
http://planet.openstreetmap.org/users_agreed/
Simon
Am 14.12.2011 12:37, schrieb
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 11:32:41AM +0100, Benjamin Lebsanft wrote:
Hallo,
Der frühere Straßenlistenauswerter, Florian Lohoff, hatte alle
Gemeinden und Städte NRWs, hat mir die Daten aber leider nicht übergeben,
obwohl von ihm und anderen für OSM zusammengetragen.
Hat er dir
Hallo Flo,
Ich denke aus den paar Zeilen ergibt sich warum hier nichts mehr passiert
ist - und ich denke mein Frust ueber den OSM Lizenzwechsel kommt darin
auch durch ...
Ich kann deinen Unmut verstehen. Ich denke auch, dass niemand von dir
verlangt, die ganzen Services wieder laufen zu
Moin Marian
Ich hoffe, Du kennst Dich auf der Konsole aus.
osmfilter stadt-koeln.osm --keep=highway=primary =secondary =tertiary
=residental =unclassified =road =living-street strassen-koeln.osm
osmconvert strassen-koeln.osm --drop-nodes koeln_ways.osm
grep 'tag k=name' koeln_ways.osm str.txt
Am 14. Dezember 2011 14:59 schrieb Klaus-Hermann Otto Stanislaus
Plöger k.ploe...@gastradata.de:
Moin Marian
Ich hoffe, Du kennst Dich auf der Konsole aus.
Ja, kein Problem.
osmfilter stadt-koeln.osm --keep=highway=primary =secondary =tertiary
=residental =unclassified =road =living-street
Hallo Florian,
ich freue mich, dass Du jetzt hier Stellung nimmst!
Auch ich kann Deinen Unmut und Unwillen zur ODBL-Lizenz verstehen, das ist
jedermanns eigene Sache.
Viel wichtiger: viele OSM-ler haben ihre Straßenlisten eingestellt und vor
allem aktiv gepflegt, so auch ich. So habe ich z.B.
1 - 100 of 180 matches
Mail list logo
