M…
Les cartes proposées ne semblent pas mises-à-jour de façon quotidienne (des
ajouts de tronçons cyclables que j’ai fait il y a plus d’une semaine n’y
apparaissent encore).
Merci néanmoins pour ce lien très utile!
Daniel
From: Pierre Béland [mailto:pierz...@yahoo.fr]
Sent:
concerned will give their “two cents” because the
context in Manitoba or in Yukon may be (is) quite different, and I do not want
an Eastern centric solution on the subject :-)
Best regards,
DanielI
From: Daniel Begin [mailto:jfd...@hotmail.com]
Sent: July-24-15 10:09
To: 'Adam Martin
Anderson
Cc: Daniel Begin; Stewart C. Russell; talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Highway recoding
Reviewing the types that you suggest here, the result seems reasonable. Major
Canadian Highways are generally a blend of the two, I find. Type 1 trunks rely
on restricted access
with it?
Daniel
From: Tristan Anderson [mailto:andersontris...@hotmail.com]
Sent: July-23-15 17:18
To: Daniel Begin; 'Stewart C. Russell'; talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
Subject: RE: [Talk-ca] Highway recoding
So it seems like we're coming to some agreement. The current Canadian
definition based
://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway:International_equivalence
c) http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Canadian_tagging_guidelines
From: Daniel Begin [mailto:jfd...@hotmail.com]
Sent: July-22-15 16:44
To: 'Paul Norman'; talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Highway recoding
Bonjour
Thank Russel,
Your description is pretty close of the one I had in mind (about trunks) before
I found the Canadian definition was referring to the mentioned document.
Cheers,
Daniel
-Original Message-
From: Stewart C. Russell [mailto:scr...@gmail.com]
Sent: July-23-15 08:44
To:
Bonjour Andrew,
Good initiative!
And it will be perfect if you add all necessary links to good
practices/warnings about imports!-)
I had a look at Canvec+ details (a).
- The prepackaged files (250K tiles) are going to be quite large since, from
what I understand, they have merged together all
-guidance.pdf
f) http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway
From: Tristan Anderson [mailto:andersontris...@hotmail.com]
Sent: July-22-15 13:17
To: Daniel Begin; talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
Subject: RE: [Talk-ca] Highway recoding
As I've always understood it, highway=trunk is used for core
I would like to have community's point of view on this topic.
Recently I have seen most primary roads in my area being recoded as trunk by
at least two users. They both refer to a governmental document (a) to
justify their edits but I disagree with their interpretation. I have asked
them to
] Highway recoding
On 7/22/2015 11:43 AM, Daniel Begin wrote:
So far, I understand we have 2.5 votes for tagging trunk/motorway all roads
identified as “core route” in document (a); 0.5 against (I am still torn
between the two approaches!-)
More comments would be appreciated
Such an approach
I understand (and agree) from this thread that...
We only keep notes that can be used to fix something later and drop the rest.
It is the rule I will apply from now on.
Daniel
-Original Message-
From: Paul Norman [mailto:penor...@mac.com]
Sent: July-06-15 20:33
To:
AFAIK, it has never been discussed at least on this forum. I consider it as
an error or even vandalism since it does not conform to acceptable rules (1)
A similar behavior has been seen a couple of months ago where
user:OntarioEditor added a prefix to ref tag for most primary/secondary
roads
Paul Norman wrote: Address interpolation indicating roads where there are no
roads is an interesting one, and might be suitable to a QA tool.
Just recall that there are two issues with this one. ..
- Imports of addresses data have been done without importing corresponding
roads (there are roads
Salut Bruno,
J’ai travaillé à Laval il y a un bon moment. L’imagerie de l’époque était
médiocre alors j’utilisais les tracés GPS disponibles pour caler les images. Il
y a peut-être un peu de ça dans ce que tu constates?
Daniel
From: Bruno Remy [mailto:bremy.qc...@gmail.com]
Sent:
Merci Pierre pour ce ménage du temps des fêtes !-)
As-tu rejoint Alain512 concernant la situation? Je remarque que ce
contributeur est toujours actif et qu’il a essayé de corriger la situation il y
a à peine 3 mois (Changeset: 25625517).
J’ai tenté de joindre Alain512 en Octobre 2011
Japprouve!
La donnée Canvec nest pas un problème lorsque cest la meilleure
disponible. Le problème est la mauvaise manipulation des données existantes
par certains contributeurs. Cest là quun meilleur encadrement pourrait
faire une grande différence et limiter les frustrations légitime
Bonjour OSM lovers!
First, a short clarification – I do not know if Canvec will no longer (never
again) be supplied in OSM format, I just know there are currently no resources
allocated to work with the OSM community.
Second, about the Canvec conversion scripts …
- They are
, since I used to be the NRCan contact (now retired), I wish to make
clear that my answer is from an OSM user’s point of view, not an NRCan answer
(official or not !-)
Best
Daniel
From: Darren Wiebe [mailto:dar...@aleph-com.net]
Sent: November-15-14 16:21
To: Daniel Begin
Cc
Well, as far as I know, NRCan have no more projects around OSM community since
fall 2012 - no more Canvec in .osm format, no more participation to the talk-ca
list. Governmental priorities change and they could eventually get back to the
community but, for the moment, I am even surprised the
Merci pour l’information!
From: Bruno Remy [mailto:bremy.qc...@gmail.com]
Sent: September-19-14 09:42
To: Pierre Béland
Cc: talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Bing updated imagery in Windsor, Ontario
Bonjour Pierre,
C'est intégré dans JOSM (sans plug-in supplémentaire ...
://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/45.8514/-71.1917
Best,
Daniel
From: Stewart C. Russell [mailto:scr...@gmail.com]
Sent: September-17-14 20:46
To: talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Large polygons in JOSM
On 14-09-15 05:41 PM, Daniel Begin wrote:
About Canvec, the product often duplicates
+1
From: Bruno Remy [mailto:bremy.qc...@gmail.com]
Sent: September-17-14 08:37
To: Daniel Begin
Cc: Sam Dyck; Tom Taylor; Talk-CA OpenStreetMap
Subject: RE: [Talk-ca] Large polygons in JOSM
Hello,
Well... i agree with you, Daniel, about use of inner/outer membership roles
I give a big +1 to James' comments
-Original Message-
From: James Ewen [mailto:ve6...@gmail.com]
... existing data usually stays. Obviously a mistake was made. We're all human.
... whichever source has the best resolution should be the one that stays, or
perhaps a merge of the best
I would ask http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/CanvecImports CanvecImports to
clean his mess…
Daniel
From: Stewart C. Russell [mailto:scr...@gmail.com]
Sent: August-27-14 11:44
To: Talk-CA OpenStreetMap
Subject: [Talk-ca] Confusing CanVec import: Elliot Lake
Hi - back in Elliot Lake
+1
Daniel
From: Pierre Béland [mailto:pierz...@yahoo.fr]
Sent: July-29-14 14:05
To: talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Coastline or not coastline
Un premier contributeur a successivement modifié, effacé et recréé plusieurs
chemins. Ensuite plusieurs autres alertés par des
Considering this nice summer time (at least in my area), this should be
implemented using OSM J
http://www.technologyreview.com/view/528836/forget-the-shortest-route-across
-a-city-new-algorithm-finds-the-most-beautiful/
Daniel
___
Talk-ca
Bonjour Soham,
IMHO, importing a street network to improve the accuracy of an area that is
already covered is not a good idea and could be considered as vandalism -
mainly because it means deleting what have been done by previous
contributors. However, if you have the time to compare both
BTW, the Canvec product has been updated about 10 years ago (with satellite
imagery) over Northern Canada. It is actually the most up-to-date part of
Canada!
Daniel
From: i...@gmx.com [mailto:i...@gmx.com]
Sent: March-27-14 22:13
To: 'Adam Martin'
Cc: talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
Subject:
Many thanks Harald J
Daniel
From: Harald Kliems [mailto:kli...@gmail.com]
Sent: January-12-14 18:04
To: Daniel Begin
Cc: Connors, Bernie (SNB); Talk-CA OpenStreetMap
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] GPS and Motorway links ...
Some updates on this issue:
I contacted Martijn a while ago
Bonjour Richard,
You wrote that Imports are harmful to OpenStreetMap and to the OpenStreetMap
community. I'm inclined not to agree with you. However I may have missed
something obvious.
Saying that data import is harmful to OpenStreetMap project and harmful to
its community sounds like sharing
Provinces provide roads to NRCan that simply package it for GeoBase and
Canvec. I might be wrong but I am on the impression that some provinces (not
all) create vertices at intersections (2D) and do not consider the elevation
(3D). When converting to OSM, duplicated vertices (one on each road) are
+1 - It worked for my test areas
From: Harald Kliems [mailto:kli...@gmail.com]
Sent: November-27-13 11:05
To: Daniel Begin
Cc: Connors, Bernie (SNB); Talk-CA OpenStreetMap
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] GPS and Motorway links ...
So before contacting Martijn I want to be sure that we can
It seems to me it is the only safe solution. I go for maproulette.org
Daniel
From: Connors, Bernie (SNB) [mailto:bernie.conn...@snb.ca]
Sent: November-26-13 08:19
To: 'Harald Kliems'; Daniel Begin
Cc: Talk-CA OpenStreetMap
Subject: RE: [Talk-ca] GPS and Motorway links ...
+1
The example I provided yesterday was not fixed. Most the exits having a
similar look along the trans-Canada Highway in Quebec are the same. I have
also found examples in Alberta and In BC.
Daniel
From: Harald Kliems [mailto:kli...@gmail.com]
Sent: November-26-13 10:04
To: Daniel Begin
Cc
Bonjour,
I've just found out that I have routing troubles with OSM data in a Garmin
GPS when motorway_link are not tagged oneway=yes/no. Here is an example
where some segments of motorway_link can be driven both ways (2 lanes, one
each side)
]
Sent: November-25-13 15:06
To: Daniel Begin
Cc: Talk-CA OpenStreetMap
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] GPS and Motorway links ...
Daniel,
if you look at the motorway_link page in the wiki
(http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Motorway_link) you'll see that by
default it implies oneway=yes. That would
I have found something odd with the rendering of OSM Cycle map; right on the
boundary. Didn't know there was such a cliff in the area!
http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=14/45.0011/-72.1567
http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=14/45.0011/-72.1567layers=C layers=C
Daniel
Thanks for having found the missing part Harald!-)
From: Harald Kliems [mailto:kli...@gmail.com]
Sent: November-04-13 09:17
To: Daniel Begin
Cc: Steve Roy; Talk-CA OpenStreetMap
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] CanVec 10 Data
I think Daniel's email got cut off at the end :-)
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013
://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation
Puis building sous…
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:building
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/relations
From: Blanca Mancilla [mailto:bluc...@gmail.com]
Sent: October-29-13 21:00
To: Daniel Begin
Cc: Pierre Béland; Pascal Robichaud; Bruno Remy
...@gmail.com]
Sent: October-29-13 21:00
To: Daniel Begin
Cc: Pierre Béland; Pascal Robichaud; Bruno Remy; talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Cartopartie le dimanche 27 octobre 2013
Mon point de vue c'est le suivant:
Si je veux faire une carte du cartier avec les cafés, je veux tous les
C’est ce que j’ai constaté à de nombreuses reprises à plusieurs endroits au
Québec. Mais avant d’aller plus loin, qu’en disent les abonnées de cette liste?
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Daniel
From: Pascal
– et au Canada J
Daniel
From: Pierre Béland [mailto:pierz...@yahoo.fr]
Sent: October-28-13 20:54
To: Daniel Begin; 'Pascal Robichaud'; 'Bruno Remy'
Cc: talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Cartopartie le dimanche 27 octobre 2013
A mon avis, on ne doit indiquer que l'activité
Hi Steve,
You wrote that one of the hardest parts was to figure out what set to
download from Canvec ftp site...
There was a link in the Canvec Wiki page to find out what file to download
(using the NTS map number like 021E05) but it is broken now. I found
another way to find it out. Go to...
Bonjour Yves,
Il y a toujours moyen d'utiliser le tag ele=* (
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ele ) sur chaque coordonnée d'intérêt
mais pour ce qui est de faire apparaître la valeur aux intersections, c'est
plus une question liée au programme de rendu (rendering)...
Daniel
-Original
The links in the wiki (Canvec) is now corrected
Daniel
From: François Paquette [mailto:fpaque...@cooptel.qc.ca]
Sent: July-20-13 18:18
To: 'Daniel Begin'; 'Adam Dunn'; 'talk-ca'
Subject: RE: [Talk-ca] Canvec-OSM FTP Down?
Try with
http://ftp2.cits.rncan.gc.ca/OSM/pub http://ftp2
Bonjour Adam,
I tried to access the site about a week ago without success. I was hoping
the problem was temporary but I now worried.
Daniel
From: Adam Dunn [mailto:dunna...@gmail.com]
Sent: July-20-13 15:46
To: talk-ca
Subject: [Talk-ca] Canvec-OSM FTP Down?
Just tried to download a
Completely agreed...
Daniel
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Buchanan [mailto:matthew.ian.bucha...@gmail.com]
Sent: July-09-13 12:04
To: OSM Talk-ca
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Using OpenStreetMap on a daily basis
I have been using OSM for a couple years now (coming up on 1000
changesets!)
Bonjour dega,
Comme l'écrivait Pierre... Les imports Canvec, tout comme les traces GPS,
ce sont des outils pour compléter la carte, mais il ne faut pas les utiliser
aveuglément.
En 2009, Frank Steggink a écrit: I think that 'Libérer le trésor' (liberate
the treasure) is an excellent slogan for
]
Sent: June-20-13 23:05
To: Daniel Begin
Cc: Talk-CA OpenStreetMap
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Licence fédérale et Défi GéoHack de Mtl
Merci Daniel, mais justement, le bout de la licence de la ville de Montréal
qui la lie à des licences mondiales bien connues du milieu ne devrait-il pas
faire partie
Bonjour Nicolas,
La nouvelle licence me semble très similaire à la précédente (celle qui a
permis limport des données Canvec) mais semble écrite pour être plus
lisible par le commun des mortels! Je comprends que cest une licence de
type BY (attribution), tout comme la précédente.
Pour ce
Bonjour all
To add my comments on this topic, I never add ordinary sidewalks except if
they are physically separated from the street (not adjacent to). If I had
to map them, I would use sidewalk:* tags.
I still think as Richard wrote: I have roads and other things to map; I'll
worry about
Tom wrote: I'm getting the feeling that, short of a definitive survey, a
good map is a matter of careful judgement.
I was involved in map business for almost 30 years and I met just a few
people that could have said that in such simple terms!
Thank you
Daniel
-Original Message-
From:
Agreed about GPS behaviour,
and do not take for grant your 3m accuracy. I got 3m accuracy measurement on
my GPSmap 60CSX but a much larger differences looking at my traces, with the
same device, the same track, same day, but under different meteorological
condition. Multiple tracks are always
Hi all,
just in case you forgot, there is a metadata.txt file included with each
Canvec .zip file. Usually, all layers having the same validity date range
are internally consistent with each others.
You should have a look if you are concerned by inconsistencies.
Au cas ou vous auriez
Paul, I understand Bryan's point of view. In a former life I had to ask map
users if they were preferring map consistency with old data or map
inconsistency with an updated road network. They mostly preferred the last
option
If we go on your proposal, one could upload an entire map sheet except
Bonjour,
I always tag names as name='name used locally'. If a French/English version
is used (I mean really used), Then I use name='name used locally',
name:fr='French name', name:en='English name.
I use both name:en and name:fr because JOSM used to complain when the value
of name= was not
Bonjour,
Quelqu'un peut vérifier ce qui se passe dans la région des Îles de
Boucherville?
Encore uns zone inondée par une mauvaise manipulation du coastline?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=45.6101lon=-73.4411zoom=13layers=M
Daniel
___
Bonjour,
I just find out that there is no more GPS Tracks Tabs in Openstreetmap.org
site. Did I miss something, Can I upload my GPS tracks somewhere else?
Daniel
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
Bonjour,
I know that I'm not totally unbiased !-) but as it is an important question,
I'll add my two cents as OSM contributor...
Bulk import - Canvec for instance - is helpful to fill white areas on OSM
map. Not doing twice what is already available and focus on updating, or
adding features,
Agreed with Paul,
The new version of Canvec (release 10) is compatible with the osm coastline
definition but still configured as multipolygon where the product is unaware
it is the ocean . For the moment, only BC and Northern part of Nunavut is
geometrically and correctly tagged.
Daniel
Forwarding an email that did not reach talk-ca list -
_
From: Bégin, Daniel [mailto:daniel.be...@rncan-nrcan.gc.ca]
Sent: April 6, 2012 13:24
To: 'talk-ca@openstreetmap.org'
Cc: 'David Groom'
Subject: [Talk-ca] Canvec.osm Product - Running!
Bonjour OSMers!
Canvec.osm product
Bonjour encore,
Pretty useful tool! It helps me identifying non-odbl coastline nodes/ways
between Sept-îles and Mingan really fast. I'm on the process of deleting
non-odbl objects and replace them with a brand new 200Km of coastline (69K
objects).
Well, I just hope everything will continue to
De : Daniel Begin jfd...@hotmail.com
À : talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
Envoyé le : Dimanche 26 février 2012 12h28
Objet : [Talk-ca] Duplicated ways
Bonjour,
I'm cleaning up my area for relicensing problems and I have found duplicated
ways that raise some questions - not related
Bonjour,
There is an primary road (ref=112) around here that have been closed for two
year - authorities detected cracks in the pavement that was suggesting that
the road was sliding toward a large mining pit. All traffic is divert toward
Vimy Ridge since then.
don't zoom that much!
Regards,
Daniel
_
From: Paul Norman [mailto:penor...@mac.com]
Sent: February-25-12 17:05
To: 'Daniel Begin'; talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
Subject: RE: [Talk-ca] Closed Road Tagging
If they were doing work on it Id suggest highway=construction. If theyve
just
has an idea on the best list to contact about this rendering
problem?
Thanks
Daniel
-Original Message-
From: Harald Kliems [mailto:kli...@gmail.com]
Sent: February-25-12 20:46
To: Daniel Begin
Cc: infosbelas-...@yahoo.fr; talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Re : Closed
Bonjour Tyler,
I don't know the best practices about naming roads when a road is not really
named like Tyler Gunn Trunk Highway. I prefer not adding any name tag when
the name tag would actually be a combination of other tags and context as
you suggest...
Context: with few exceptions, all
Bonjour Richard and all,
I might not be totally unbiased !-) but I don't agree with Richard here.
Actually, since I've imported Canvec data for my neighbourhood, I have been
able to update/add/remove a lot of features/details that are not available
in any other map. Stop sign, lights,
Hi all,
A month ago I found a lot of messy multipolygons having natural=coastline
and/or waterway=riverbank mixed all together in Montreal area, resulting in
bad rendering ...
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=45.295lon=-73.005zoom=9layers=M
All came from user -
Salut Yves,
c'est relativement simple à cartographier et ça pourrait-être un thème lors
d'un prochain mapping party.
Lors du dernier mapping party qui s'est tenu à Sherbrooke en juin, laccent
a été mis sur la cartographie du Campus de l'Université de Sherbrooke qui
comprend de nombreux
Seems NRCan is considered a spammer for talk-ca list !-) so I forward the
message from my personnal account.
-Original Message-
From: Bégin, Daniel [mailto:daniel.be...@rncan-nrcan.gc.ca]
Sent: 28 septembre 2011 08:16
To: 'talk-ca@openstreetmap.org'
Subject: [Talk-ca] Canvec.osm
Hi all,
I have been imported Canvec data around US-QC-ON border and I'm having a
similar question. When should we use Canvec data as is (natural=water) and
when should we transform it into natural=coastline?
Using natural=coastline on US border (to match tagging with the US portion)
seems fine
Hi all,
I've found some street missing in Cornwall Ontario. Seems deleted to me.
Someone is aware about that?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=45.01442lon=-74.73045zoom=16layers=M
Daniel
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
-11 07:07
To: Daniel Begin; Pierre Beland
Cc: 'HOT Openstreetmap'; 'talk-ca'
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] [HOT] Flooding in Richelieu River, Quebec, Canada
:Follow-up(Complement of information)
Hi,
Great find Daniel !
To use directly the GeoTiff images in JOSM, you could try the
ImportImagePlugin
Bonjour tous le monde,
I have generated a 30m and 31m contour lines for Richelieu river and lake
Champlain (using SRTM data). It fits the 30m contour provided by
Jean-Guilhem but doesn't seem to fit pretty well the flooded wetland area
provided by Pierre.
Any idea if this data can be used
at an
image that contains what I'm looking for - the flooded area! Why not
mapping from it? I understand the image can be used -
http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/ImageUse/
Any idea on how I can use this GeoTiff image in JOSM?
Cheers,
Daniel
_
From: Daniel Begin [mailto:jfd
Hi Richard,
I'm a bit confuse about the announcement. What is that for? What purpose
does it deserved? I should have miss something!
Cheers,
Daniel
-Original Message-
From: Richard Weait [mailto:rich...@weait.com]
Sent: May-06-11 11:55
To: Talk-CA OpenStreetMap
Subject: [Talk-ca] more
-
From: Richard Weait [mailto:rich...@weait.com]
Sent: May-06-11 18:52
To: Daniel Begin
Cc: Talk-CA OpenStreetMap
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] more Canadian OSM extracts coming
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 6:40 PM, Daniel Begin jfd...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi Richard,
I'm a bit confuse about the announcement
Hi guys,
I should also have send it to the list. Now it is done!
Daniel
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Begin [mailto:jfd...@hotmail.com]
Sent: May-04-11 20:07
To: 'James A. Treacy'
Subject: RE: [Talk-ca] Great Lakes shoreline
Hi James
About your question: having a way with natural
:55 AM, Daniel Begin wrote:
Hi all,
I need someone to confirm the following about reference system...
Context: Paul and I are uploading US-Canada boundary monuments/turning
points to get a stable and verifiable information. The data is available
from their web site and I got the confirmation
,
Daniel
-Original Message-
From: Paul Norman [mailto:penor...@mac.com]
Sent: March-27-11 14:07
To: 'Richard Weait'; 'Daniel Begin'
Cc: talk-ca@openstreetmap.org; talk...@openstreetmap.org;
impo...@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Proposed import of IBC data (was RE: [Talk-ca] NAD83-SCRS vs WGS84
-27-11 18:37
To: 'Richard Weait'; 'Daniel Begin'
Cc: impo...@openstreetmap.org; talk...@openstreetmap.org;
talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
Subject: RE: [Talk-us] Proposed import of IBC data (was RE: [Talk-ca]
NAD83-SCRS vs WGS84 Reference systems)
For the area here, they appear to all have monuments
Hi all,
I need someone to confirm the following about reference system...
Context: Paul and I are uploading US-Canada boundary monuments/turning
points to get a stable and verifiable information. The data is available
from their web site and I got the confirmation that the data can be used
Hi John
I understand that alouette995 is trying to find/get all object in Quebec
with rcn_ref=1 tag. Is there a way to do such a request?
By the way, I might be interested in your VB program :-)
Daniel
_
From: john whelan [mailto:jwhelan0...@gmail.com]
Sent: March-10-11
Hi all,
First, the routing apps we are being using for two days is pretty useful,
I've been able to make many corrections to the road network I uploaded in
the area for connection/one way errors.
However, I need advises on another topic...
I'm uploading Canvec around Canada/US boundary
Hi Samuel,
About tagging forested areas, I would use landuse=forest only if it is
obvious on the field that the area is managed/harvested, as for
landuse=orchard or landuse=vineyard. We have a lot of Christmas tree
plantations in the area and I map them as landuse=forest because it is
obvious
This message was intended to the whole community
-Original Message-
From: Richard Weait [mailto:rich...@weait.com]
Sent: January-28-11 12:49
To: Daniel Begin
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] About OSM communication channels
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Daniel Begin jfd...@hotmail.com wrote
I agree with Olivier,
It certainly needs more effort but the result is there. Blind import never
helps. It just mess-up with others work.
Blind Canvec import could have been done by NRCan, messing-up all the work
done by each OSM contributor. It doesn't help the project to have the
impression
Salut Frank,
September-12-10 03:30 Frank Steggink wrote:
... am focused on land use data import in the Netherlands. This is a huge
effort as well. The large block of land use coverage was imported by myself:
http://osm.org/go/0GQJNa. Although the Netherlands is much smaller than
Canada, this
Hi Michael and all
I have set up a Canvec Import - Work in progress section in the wiki...
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Canvec
It aims at keeping track of what is going on with Canvec Import. It doesn't
aim at keeping an history of what have been done, neither to manage what
have
Hi all,
Why don't we register only Work in progress in the wiki?
- What have been done is obvious on the map!
- What have to be done is also obvious on the map!
If you wish to import Canvec to a white space in OSM,
just look at the wiki...
- If it is listed as Work in progress, choose an other
Hi all,
When you say 'ocean water polygons', I guess you are talking about modifying
natural=coastline ways (PGS or others) that define oceans among other things
using/for Canvec data?
I usually prefer to keep the original data and make it fits on the (assumed
better) reference data.
Hi Tyler and all!
I would consider Sherbrooke as a well mapped area!-)
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=45.3788lon=-71.8948zoom=14layers=B000FT
F
Actually there are plenty of good examples around the country, each of them
having their own color.
Welcome
Daniel
_
Hi Sam and all
I'm wondering if the best tiling is a fixed number of tiles (5X5) or if it
should be defined as a maximum size of some type for a tile.
Using JOSM/Canvec files, I worked in high density urban areas where a 4X8
tiling was almost insufficient. For some rural areas, a 2X2 tiling
You don't know what to do this weekend.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Haiti#2010_Earthquake_Respons
e
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
Amazing!
Have a look at the following link. It gives a idea about what we can do as
osm mapper.
http://brainoff.com/weblog/2010/01/14/1518
Daniel
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
Amazing!
Have a look at the following links. It gives a idea about what we can do as
osm mapper.
http://brainoff.com/weblog/2010/01/14/1518
http://www.gisuser.com/content/view/15767/28/
Daniel
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Hi all, I'm guilty!
Actually, I'm importing the Canvec road network in Laval (north of Montreal)
because I've done a lot GPS mapping in this area. Last week I used
canvec-to-osm to convert the rest of the road network. So, if the tags are
not appropriate, something should be modified in the
Hi guys,
Actually, I've found it difficult to understand where to get all the data
available (until last weekend!). I was disappointed when I got my hand on
the Canvec .osm file and found out that there were neither roads nor
hydrography.
So, I would prefer having all the hydrography - and
Bonjour Sam, bonjour tout le monde!
I was almost certain and yesterday I got confirmation from NRCan that Canvec
has Geobase inside - Canvec Road and Hydro network are a COPY of Geobase
NRN-NHN.
It says that everything added in Geobase since the last Canvec release is
included in the new
100 matches
Mail list logo
