with the left:
right: type of situation.
James
VE6SRV
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
:)
Awesome, we can finally see the fruits of the work based on Nearmap.
Non-transparent tiles on nearmap.com has been something I've wanted
for ages, is there a URL hack we can use for the moment?
James
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http
On 22 March 2010 15:38, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=-27.44227lon=153.03687zoom=17layers=B000FTF
Not sure why someone tagged all the railway lines like that...
Like what, exactly? The tagging looks perfectly cromulent to me.
James
On 22 March 2010 16:52, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 22 March 2010 18:48, James Andrewartha tr...@student.uwa.edu.au wrote:
On 22 March 2010 15:38, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=-27.44227lon=153.03687zoom=17layers=B000FTF
On 22 March 2010 19:53, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 22 March 2010 21:21, James Andrewartha tr...@student.uwa.edu.au wrote:
That's what they're called, so yes.
Called by whom?
All I ever see published is things like North Shore Line etc...
This is a railway yard
On 22 March 2010 19:57, James Andrewartha tr...@student.uwa.edu.au wrote:
On 22 March 2010 19:53, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 22 March 2010 21:21, James Andrewartha tr...@student.uwa.edu.au wrote:
That's what they're called, so yes.
Called by whom?
All I ever see
On 22 March 2010 20:15, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 22 March 2010 21:57, James Andrewartha tr...@student.uwa.edu.au wrote:
This is a railway yard, the various lines are called Road #, eg
http://broadway.pennsyrr.com/Rail/Prr/Maps/Itlk/pavonia.gif
Anything a little more
. I clicked on the inspector, and it tells me that
there are 79 ways associated with the point I clicked on... There
should only be one.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/45266403
AUUGGG
James
VE6SRV
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca
unnamed individual merging ways that shouldn't
have been.
I still need to promote highway 28 to Cold Lake to meet the list of trunk ways.
James
VE6SRV
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
of road might only be
a gravel surface.
If it were up to me, classification would denote the importance of the
road in the road network, and surface, number of lanes, and other tags
would describe the physical attributes of the roadway.
My two bits, and then some!
James
VE6SRV
what the rendering engines will do with it.
The database and renderers are pretty much married to each other.
Without the database, the renderers are useless. Without the
renderers, it's pretty hard to visualize the data.
James
VE6SRV
___
Talk-ca mailing
application, you just have to pay to use it more than 3
times, or look at a bunch of advertising, etc...
It's all about education!
James
VE6SRV
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
be what it's used for. I think I recall seeing a new bridge
structure there now. Xellos is on my friends list. I'll see if I can
get his attention. I have never seen him on this reflector though.
James
VE6SRV
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca
/grandingsv
Having Google Streetview available is great, as it makes it really
easy to share real world views of the area easily. I am constantly
amazed at the information we have available these days!
James
VE6SRV
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 2:17 PM, si...@mungewell.org wrote:
Geobase should have all of the Canadian street names, and we can use
those... just need to figure a way to display both to allow easy
copying/transferal.
GeoBase contains some errors... One road near the area Richard pointed
out that
world has been rendered less than
perfect, and that almost all of these edits all have the same username
associated with them.
James
VE6SRV
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
Now he's buggered up Lesser Slave Lake...
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/50259428
How do you revert screw ups?
James
VE6SRV
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
ask them how much
creativity/definable authorship was involved in creating the database
- if there isn't any you could mention that it's not copyrightable
anyway.
James Andrewartha
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http
capacidad, normalmente autonomicas, que tag suele usar? 'trunk'
es para carreteras national (N-XXX), 'primary' doblados son con 'motorroad' si
la matricula no es 'A...'
He pensado a utilizar 'motorway' pero con via unica, o primary con motorroad.
Que opinéis? (http://osm.org/go/b9KyMnb)
James
, and maybe help educate them a little
bit.
James
VE6SRV
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
...!
Saludos
James
Message: 7
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 03:26:25 +0100
From: sanchi sanc...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Talk-es] Increíble
To: Discusión en Español de OpenStreetMap talk-es@openstreetmap.org
Message-ID:
84997c5f1002221826u1ac136e9w632b5e78c7a40...@mail.gmail.com
Content
to winter roads in the BC, Alberta, and
Manitoba wiki pages. Does anyone know of any examples of roads with
access restrictions based on time/season?
James
VE6SRV
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo
http://www.mobile-ent.biz/news/36033/MWC-2010-Two-thirds-of-mobile-users-want-driving-AND-walking-navigation
MWC 2010: Two thirds of mobile users want driving AND walking navigation
by Stuart Dredge | Email a friend | PrintAdd a comment
Two legs good, four tyres not necessarily better
A
On 11/02/2010, at 8:14 PM, Stefan Neufeind wrote:
Agreed, trying to ask them would be a good thing. Has helped in some
cases in the past where authorities (city government or the like)
re-thought their license :-)
The Australian Toilet Map data got discussed on talk-au back in December, and
On 11/02/2010, at 5:33 AM, Liz wrote:
Haven't got far through the judgement so far but this sounds quite clear.
7.
The Copyright Act does not protect facts, ideas or information contained in a
work, to ensure a balance is struck between the interests of authors and
those
in society: IceTV
the attribution requirement, without having to worry about which
specific portion of the data is derived from which source.
James
VE6SRV
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
On 21/01/2010, at 9:35 AM, Steve Bennett wrote:
I would suggest tagging the way leisure=slipway. If you need to
break the current specification to do so, then make a note on the wiki
page. Tagging it highway=service seems wrong. Service roads do not
go underwater...
The tagging system is
On 15/01/2010, at 8:45 PM, Liz wrote:
so perhaps the signs are actually meaningless in law
they appear in council minutes so perhaps its a local council job
From my searching, it looks like councils are responsible for putting up these
signs and I couldn't find any actual legal definition of
On 16/01/2010, at 9:32 AM, John Smith wrote:
This seems like a spurious argument, ok your suggestion will allow
both projects to profit from your data, but any additions can't be
shared back with your suggested project, nor will Google share any of
it's data back, unless it's in Google's own
On 07/01/2010, at 5:25 PM, John Smith wrote:
2010/1/7 Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com:
I usually interpret designated as signed, which is
an attractive interpretation because it's verifiable.
To avoid confusion perhaps it should have been bicycle=signed? :)
Then we would have confusion
, arguably
roads should be foot=no.
James Andrewartha
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
On 04/01/2010, at 9:57 PM, Steve Bennett wrote:
. Ok, there are a few issues. First, natural= just describes what's on the
land, like trees or not, so isn't useful. The right tag would be something
like landuse=reserve, although this appears to be still under debate:
On 04/01/2010, at 5:19 PM, Mark Pulley wrote:
The question is, should we move highway= onto the relation for all
relations? There's probably a fix for Mapnik to save editing every
relation we've done, so I've added a ticket to OSM.
http://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/2599
I wouldn't
? To be brutally honest, no one cares who
you do or don't reply to.
I do, as his decision will mean less of your spam on the list (of
course now I'm guilty of this, but whatever).
James Andrewartha
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http
; the national
speed limit is different for single carriageways, dual carriageways, and
motorways (though I think all motorways are explicitly signed with the
relevant speed limit). The national speed limit has changed in the past.
--
David James
___
talk
?
Here's an example, and while OSM projects are probably much better
than Ubuntu at fixing bugs, the equation still holds:
http://glyphobet.net/blog/blurb/1214
James Andrewartha
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http
On 14/12/2009, at 6:41 PM, Steve Bennett wrote:
I think my central argument is this: Your sports_club venue could be
- a sports facility with no eating/drinking/gambling facilities for the public
- an eating/drinking/gambling venue for the public with no sports facilities
- or both.
This
On 14/12/2009, at 6:58 PM, Stephen Hope wrote:
The reason I thought they may be a QLD thing is the state Government
here licences them a bit differently from your average pub (or used
to, I haven't checked lately). Thus the (official) members only
rules, connection to a sport club, etc.
On 14/12/2009, at 7:10 PM, Steve Bennett wrote:
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 8:03 PM, James Livingston doc...@mac.com wrote:
I'm sure that there was a tag for the first, although I can't find it now.
Something like leisure=club_rooms or similar, which related to a sporting
group but wasn't
Does anyone know why the area around around Raton, NM looks like it is
melting? I don't think it even renders in Osmarender.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=36.93134lon=-104.46384zoom=16layers=B000FTF
___
Talk-us mailing list
Thanks, I reverted them back to their last known address-- much closer to
Santa Fe than Santa Claus.
James
(resending to list)
On Monday 14 December 2009 12:21:07 pm you wrote:
On Mon, 2009-12-14 at 09:18 -0800, Dave Hansen wrote:
On Mon, 2009-12-14 at 12:07 -0500, James Umbanhowar wrote
On 09/12/2009, at 11:46 AM, Anthony wrote:
A transfer of copyright is a transfer of exclusive rights. In the US, and
probably in other jurisdictions as well, it must be signed and in writing.
One key difference is that someone who is granted a nonexclusive license does
not have the power
On 12/12/2009, at 7:07 AM, andrzej zaborowski wrote:
But if the foundation wants to have copyright in the data I think
it's trivial for it to have some by doing *some* of the maintenance
edits on behalf of the foundation or one person (or more) transferring
their rights instead of everyone
On 11/12/2009, at 8:02 PM, Elizabeth Dodd wrote:
so we don't need imported data?
In most cases we don't need imported data, but it can be useful. For example
rather than painstakingly crafting the entire coastline of Australia from a few
GPS traces and a lot of imagery (much is relatively
On 11/12/2009, at 8:02 PM, Elizabeth Dodd wrote:
so we don't need imported data?
In most cases we don't need imported data, but it can be useful. For example
rather than painstakingly crafting the entire coastline of Australia from a few
GPS traces and a lot of imagery (much is relatively
.
--
James Treacy
tre...@debian.org
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
On 10/12/2009, at 6:57 PM, Liz wrote:
On Thu, 10 Dec 2009, Frederik Ramm wrote:
... the excellent Philippines mapping team who managed to create one
single closed way enclosing an area of roughly 300 thousand square
kilometres!
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?way=32126765
The runner-up is
On Wednesday, December 09, 2009, at 03:25PM, Chris Barham cbar...@pobox.com
wrote:
BP allows free download of GPS data for their Australian service stations.
Has anyone asked any of the other companies yet? If not, I'll send some emails
about:
, borrow that tag-line?
Wouldn't that require a long discussion on licensing conditions with the
Grauniad? (insert smiley of choice ...)
--
David James
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
On 09/12/2009, at 6:38 PM, Roy Wallace wrote:
If you derive information from observing our PhotoMaps, and include
that information in a work, you will own that work, and may distribute
it to others under a Creative Commons licence.
Does that not imply that the derived information may only be
On 09/12/2009, at 8:26 PM, Steve Bennett wrote:
Can we really maintain this? These services come and go fairly frequently.
Individual things like whether they have LPG filling for bbqs maybe, but servos
don't move that often (usually taken over by another one). In any case, it's
probably not
On 09/12/2009, at 8:41 PM, Steve Bennett wrote:
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 9:37 PM, James Livingston doc...@mac.com wrote:
I'd suggest doing something like import if there is not an existing
amenity=fuel within X distance, flag it for manual checking if there is.
Ah, didn't know that kind
can work around it by merging a node and a way, then deleting the
superfluous node. I don't think you can merge two ways though.
Ctrl-click in JOSM joins two ways.
there are two other really good ones which are key combos and i use from
the menu orthogonalise shape
AOL /
James Andrewartha
2009/12/9 David Groom revi...@pacific-rim.net:
- Original Message -
From: James Andrewartha tr...@student.uwa.edu.au
I find Potlatch is better for from-scratch editing, but for editing
existing data JOSM is as good. The modal thing is annoying, but when
there's already ways you can
On 07/12/2009, at 7:29 PM, John Smith wrote:
2009/12/7 Liz ed...@billiau.net:
James has been pointing out that the Feds, who can afford good lawyers, find
CC-by-Sa and CC-by as quite satisfactory in Australia.
As far as I can gather CC-BY-SA most likely won't work in the US, so I
can only
On 06/12/2009, at 8:44 AM, Ulf Lamping wrote:
Tom Hughes schrieb:
Polling the OSMF members is just the first stage - there will another
vote later when all contributors will be asked whether they want to
relicense.
With a gun at their head: Refuse: After the migration (currently 26th
On 06/12/2009, at 10:05 AM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
James Livingston wrote:
For example, I have inferred road positions from the CC-BY-licensed
Queensland DCDB-lite dataset, and have uploaded national park and
world-heritage areas from the CC-BY dataset on data.australia.gov.au.
As I'm
On 05/12/2009, at 10:29 PM, Alex (Maxious) Sadleir wrote:
Certainly we should make this case clear to the OSM community.
Database protection always seemed to be a euro-centric ideal and not
one that the new licence analysis seemed to respond to adequately.
However, I believe that the ODbL
On 05/12/2009, at 11:30 PM, Grant Slater wrote:
For clarity... the OSM Foundation is not some evil group...
The OSMF is open, anyone from the community can join. The OSMF Board
is democratically elected from the OSMF membership.
If anyone who isn't a OSMF member wants to read the discussion,
seems to come up with a single cycle/
pedestrain path called 'The Greenway'.
Best not use that tag unless it used a bit more widely.
James
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 20:44:45 -
From: Mike Harris mik...@googlemail.com
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Good routing vs legal routing
On 03/12/2009, at 6:12 AM, Mike Collinson wrote:
We have now fully updated the OSM Contributors agreement section of the
main proposal. I hope that meets concerns about clarity of the change-over
process.
http://www.osmfoundation.org/images/3/3c/License_Proposal.pdf
A while ago on the
On 03/12/2009, at 10:19 PM, Mike Collinson wrote:
- Whether friendly or unfriendly, they never have any obligation to merge in
their data improvements into our database.
- However, you or I can.
Does that make sense?
I completely agree that they don't have to do anything towards merging
On 03/12/2009, at 10:19 PM, Ed Avis wrote:
That was my interpretation too. It appears to me that if some well-meaning
body released a set of data under the ODbL (which presumably we recommend as
an appropriate licence for geodata) then the OSM project would not be able to
use it. In other
calls :)
So who has a whizbang phone which they would recommend??
The most open phone is the Nokia N900 - root is easy to get, and it's
most similar to a desktop Linux. Unfortunately Nokia decided not to
sell it in Australia, so you'd have to import it from the US.
James Andrewartha
of default value when data source is
Orthoimage.
Yes, that would make sense, since it is impossible to know for a fact
the actual width of a roadway from an aerial image. That's where the
feet on the pavement are important.
James
VE6SRV
___
Talk-ca
would
require both vehicles to nearly stop, and pass each other with two
wheels in the ditch each. I would call this at best 1.5 lanes wide.
So, what to do, what to do???
James
VE6SRV
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
http
.
--
James TreacyMany hands make light work
tre...@debian.org
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
exceptional cases, for example features that cross an
entire tile, but there are ways of dealing with them if this is ever
implemented.
--
James Treacy
tre...@debian.org
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org
On Wed, 4 Nov 2009, John Smith wrote:
2009/11/4 James Andrewartha tr...@tartarus.uwa.edu.au:
I couldn't say, but they might do it once for free (vs the regular updates
planned for cities). For example, the WA coverage currently goes from
Do you work for this company, or have a contact
using it.
That was the reason I asked... I figured that the space would be
limited to data related to NRCan. Best to know that up front so that
people know what data can be stored on the site.
Thanks again for making the space available.
James
VE6SRV
, and copy
attributes over.
Only tiles that contained road matcher exclusions would need to be
available. If the tile was processed without any road matcher
exclusions (no OSM data existed before the import), there's no need
for anyone to compare, as imported will match GeoBase exactly.
James
VE6SRV
will lose thousands of
hours worth of work that is not included in the GeoBase dataset.
Wiping out just the road network and importing GeoBase still leaves as
much work to realign all the rest of the data that was associated
with, or based upon the OSM road network.
James
VE6SRV
comes
along, every tool we have is flawed. Even then, satellite images can't
see through trees or clouds.
--
James Treacy
tre...@debian.org
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
-111.977,-43.489,166.408,68.185
(big)
Sure looks like people are actively working in the area...
James
VE6SRV
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
in the world is a product that is
produced by someone else, and simply purchased when needed. Sometimes
you have to roll up your sleeves and help yourself.
I found a footpath that you added to the map, so I know that you know
how this works.
James
VE6SRV
___
Talk
a road to be awful and causes
a lot of roads to be dropped, I think it is fair to let a mapper fix
things in the easiest way.
--
James Treacy
tre...@debian.org
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
=53.4480357170105lon=-113.482160568237zoom=15
James
VE6SRV
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
cleaning up the map (a big one is tying into
the surrounding roads).
- contact as many of the original mappers as you can find
- send mail to talk-ca giving reasons for wanting to do a replacement
- wait a week
- finally, send a mail to talk-ca stating your intention to start
--
James Treacy
tre
as they see fit.
James
VE6SRV
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
, that would be great.
James
VE6SRV
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
of different places.
Some of the places are on sites that remove files after a period of time (or
inactivity) so a number of the files are no longer available.
Would you also be able to store these files on your site?
--
James Treacy
tre...@debian.org
.
--
James Treacy
tre...@debian.org
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
=44.5728lon=-80.9636zoom=13layers=B000FTF
--
James Treacy
tre...@debian.org
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
On 11/10/2009, at 12:08 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
This proposal includes the deletion of all voting-related stuff
including the casted votes of the past.
I'd say that this helps prove the point that different people reading
different things into what pages on the wiki say. The proposal
and 3 above. Maybe I keep
part of the existing way where it describes the way properly, or
modifying it so it does, delete the rest of it, and then treat it all
like new construction.
James
VE6SRV
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
http
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Sam Vekemans
acrosscanadatra...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe (James) it doesn't answer your question, but should help the imports@
list understand more what's going on, as well as whoever is following along
on the talk-ca list :)
You didn't even come close
is that school board property is not displayed
distinctly. I hope there is a source for this as it would be very
useful.
--
James Treacy
tre...@debian.org
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
On 05/10/2009, at 7:54 PM, David Earl wrote:
* Three new primitives, tagkey for describing the k part of tags,
tagvalue for the v part of tags and tagdescription separated off to
allow for multiple descriptions in multiple languages without having
to
download all the data for languages
On 05/10/2009, at 8:18 PM, Marc Schütz wrote:
IMO (a) is the correct way to do this.
...
For a road, we can either choose to map it as a linear object (this
is the common case), or we can map its geometry more exactly by
using an area. In both cases, however, the object in our database
On 06/10/2009, at 10:58 PM, David Earl wrote:
On 06/10/2009 13:35, James Livingston wrote:
I can see things getting ickier than they are now if you can just
go around adding new shop= values, without having some prior
discussion to what it means. If I saw a suggested option
On 06/10/2009, at 11:30 PM, Matt Amos wrote:
so far, all the responses seem to indicate that everyone thinks
linking to OSM data by ID is OK. what about Andy's idea, though? is it
OK to take a location, name and possibly an ID as well to perform
fuzzy linking?
my view is that all the
On 06/10/2009, at 2:12 PM, John Smith wrote:
Lake Eyre etc is so big they used natural=coastline... Although this
comes back to the question the other day, where does the coastline
start/end, legally speaking it cuts across bays, it doesn't go round
them or up rivers...
I looked into this a
On 05/10/2009, at 3:59 PM, Ross Scanlon wrote:
So PLEASE look at the sat photos and already entered data before you
go removing the coastline and using the ABS data automatically as
the coastline.
As a +1 comment, I'd also like to note that in many places the ABS
follow the
On 06/10/2009, at 11:37 PM, Jim Croft wrote:
Of course, this won't work for mariners and lawyers... :)
No, but there are (proposed) tags to indicate the low-tide mark, and
the OpenSeaMap guys might have something for other various maritime
boundaries.
My favourite estuary is the Fly River
On 03/10/2009, at 4:25 PM, Gervase Markham wrote:
Wikipedia has much less need for consistency than we do (e.g. it
doesn't
matter if one article is in American English and another in Australian
English; articles are not machine-parsed) and yet they have all
sorts of
mechanisms for
On 03/10/2009, at 5:02 PM, John Smith wrote:
This was not only highly frustrating but demoralising and as a result
I've not been bothered tagging any more school zones because I don't
see a point until there is a One True Way to tag school zones.
Just do what I and a lot of other people have
On 03/10/2009, at 5:02 PM, Konrad Skeri wrote:
Time to end this debate
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/boolean_values
How precisely is that going to end the debate?
a) Voting isn't the way to do this. It either needs consensus or a
dictator.
b) Lots of people don't care
On 03/10/2009, at 5:02 PM, Konrad Skeri wrote:
Time to end this debate
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/boolean_values
Oh, and this:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/VotingOnTheWikiIsStupid
___
talk mailing
On 03/10/2009, at 5:54 PM, Konrad Skeri wrote:
Consensus will never happen and we don't have a dictator, which makes
voting the option left.
I actually agree that we just need to pick one, and since yes seems
to be the most commonly used one, that should be it. However, I just
don't see how
On 03/10/2009, at 4:29 PM, Gervase Markham wrote:
Because sometimes, occasionally, a benevolent dictator (a phrase
used by
lots of open source projects) has to break deadlock and dictate.
Things
are working well when that power is used very, very rarely, but it
needs
to exist. Mozilla
1101 - 1200 of 1373 matches
Mail list logo
