Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Lieux-dits fantoir

Eh bien si, les noms viennent soit de FANTOIR soit du cadastre (plus précis en terme de localisation, car en fin de compte c'est l'origine du nom, le FANTOIR a été créé surtout comme une copie au départ, maintenant on se demande si les communes travaillent d'abord sur leur SIG, mettent à jour le

Re: [OSM-ja] ローマ字

＞「name:ja-Hira」と「name:ja-Latn」は同じ情報を伝えませんか。 その通りです。基本的にはどちらかだけで問題ないと思います。 ＞そして、nameの漢字を知らなければ、どうしますか。たとえば、「Kaisei」はビルに大きく貼ってありますが、その言葉の漢字は知りません。もしかしたら漢字がないかな。その場合、「name=Kaisei」もいいですか。それとも、「name:ja-Latn=Kaisei」（「name」なし）の方がいいですか。 nameタグについて、厳密なルールはありません。 (1)私個人の考え osm wikiには、"Note that OSM

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Gros travail pour mettre à jour les mobilités régionales en France

Le 01/07/2018 à 19:06, Christian Rogel a écrit : En tout, 8 modes de mobiliité possibles, mettre à jour le wiki OSM où on peut inciter à répartir le travail, pas seulement en le complétant et notant les avancements, mais en migrant les pages de réseaux départementaux sous l’intitulé

[Talk-cz] amenity=college vs. amenity=school

Ahoj, začal jsem měnit amenity=college na amenity=school u středních škol, gymnázií a středních učilišť, protože to tak říká wiki. Těch chybných značení je ale tolik, že se radši ptám, nemáme-li zavedeno nějaké ryze české specifikum v tagování. Zatím jsem projel západní Čechy. Díky H.

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Lieux-dits fantoir

L’intégration des lieux dits du cadastre est une belle connerie... en témoigne toutes les localités appelées "Le Bourg" : https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/A3a Le mar. 3 juil. 2018 à 19:26, djakk djakk a écrit : > Salut ! > > Question : ça vous semble logique un lieu-dit sur une 2*2 voies ou en >

Re: [OSM-talk] proposed mechanical edit - moving FIXME=* to fixme=*

3. Lipiec 2018 21:53 od f...@zz.de : > IMHO fixing problems in the data always start with fixing the cause > why they are added in the first place. Otherwise you fix the current > state but errors start beeing added the minute you think you are "done". > That is one of

Re: [Talk-us] named links

This summarizes the approach I take towards this in regards to named or reffed links. At least until we start consistently expecting tags on entities to apply to those entities instead of a completely different entity. Adding ref to ways instead of the relation that describes the route is

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Lieux-dits fantoir

Effectivement je suis parti des points notés par Marc. Sur les exemples originaux, c'est pire : après construction de l'échangeur et alors que le hameau du Gué Mary existe, ajouter un "Le Gué Mary" sur l'échangeur n'a aucun sens d'autant que le cadastre l'indique... là où tu situes "Les

Re: [Talk-it] Parcheggio su copertura di fabbricato

Carlo, ma sei ve o sei spam? hai una foto di questo edificio parcheggio? --simone girardelli-- ## Inviato dal mio dispositivo Android con K-9 Mail. Perdonate la brevità. ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org

Re: [OSM-talk] proposed mechanical edit - moving FIXME=* to fixme=*

On 2018-07-03 22:07, Tobias Knerr wrote: On 03.07.2018 10:28, Frederik Ramm wrote: Software should be able to deal with both. In my opinion, software should not _need_ to deal with both. Working around easily fixed database quality issues is a waste of time. Good softwaredesign dictates

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Lieux-dits fantoir

On 03/07/2018 20:24, Philippe Verdy wrote: Encore une fois l'orthographe vient du cadastre. Qui contient plein d'erreurs dues à la retranscription manuelle (oui, oui) des données FANTOIR. Ou qui retranscrit fidèlement des données FANTOIR erronées. Quelques fois, l'IGN a des données plus

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Lieux-dits fantoir

tu t'es concentré sur 2 points mais les graphies de leiux-dits voisins diffèrent bien. C'est toi qui a choisi ces deux points mais initialement cela ne portait même pas sur ceux-là. Le 3 juillet 2018 à 21:50, a écrit : > Le 03/07/2018 à 21:21, Philippe Verdy - verd...@wanadoo.fr a écrit : > >

Re: [OSM-talk] proposed mechanical edit - moving FIXME=* to fixme=*

On 03.07.2018 10:28, Frederik Ramm wrote: > Don't forget that new FIXMEs will continue to appear all the time. They will, but at a lower rate. Mappers often look at existing tagging to find out how things should be tagged. This is further reinforced by tools such as JOSM's autocompletion. Thus, I

Re: [OSM-talk] proposed mechanical edit - moving FIXME=* to fixme=*

On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 07:42:16PM +0200, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > fixme tag is a standard way to mark fixmes. > Editors wishing to finish mapping in their area would (directly or > indirectly, for example using JOSM) look through objects tagged with > fixme tags. > > FIXME tag is an unexpected

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Lieux-dits fantoir

Le 03/07/2018 à 21:21, Philippe Verdy - verd...@wanadoo.fr a écrit : Je ne fais pas d'hypothèse, quand une commune mentionne partout la même orthographe et la voisine utilise systématiquement l'autre et que ça concerne des terrains qui sont à chacune d'elle, (...) Ici on parle de Pré de _La

[Talk-it] Parcheggio su copertura di fabbricato

Buonasera, Ho aggiunto un parcheggio ad un’edificio già presente in osm. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/466770114 Mi spiego: l’edificio è realizzato contromonte, è ad un solo piano fuori terra e funge da pertinenza/parcheggio, a livello della

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Lieux-dits fantoir

Je ne fais pas d'hypothèse, quand une commune mentionne partout la même orthographe et la voisine utilise systématiquement l'autre et que ça concerne des terrains qui sont à chacune d'elle, il n'y a pa-s d'erreur (ou l'erreur est historique mais sans explication on ne peut pas la changer comme on

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Lieux-dits fantoir

Tu fais l'hypothèse que le cadastre (qui est a été écrit à partir de plans papier) et FANTOIR retranscrivent toujours sans erreur. C'est une hypothèse fausse. Toute source a ses erreurs, on ne doit pas les reproduire sans réfléchir. Par exemple, sur le poste de transformation (sujet de

Re: [Talk-it-trentino] Sviluppo app navigatore per osm

Renato se hai delle date da proporre spara! Di dove sei? Ci sarebbe la possibilità di trovarci per farmi vedere come funziona il vostro tablet? Grazie! Ale Vit Il 03 Lug 2018 11:04, "Renato Conotter" ha scritto: Scusate intervengo solo ora. Noi (vvf) usiamo questo tablet da un anno. lo

[OSM-talk-fr] Fwd: voie étroite + bandes cyclables

> > >> Le 2 juil. 2018 à 23:18, Jean-Yvon Landrac > > a écrit : >> >> >> Erwan, tu confirmes ? >> https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/47.76811/-3.42428=N >> >> >> Jean-Yvon >> >> Le 02/07/2018

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Lieux-dits fantoir

Pas grave, il y a Les Grandes Rigoles pas loin : on reste dans le ton. On 03/07/2018 20:17, osm.sanspourr...@spamgourmet.com wrote: Et ça ne vous dérange pas d'écrire Marre avec deux R alors que le lieu-dit à côté a classiquement un seul r ? -- deuzeffe, qui est déjà dehors avec son 2 sous

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Lieux-dits fantoir

Maintenant si vous pensez que c'est une erreur, signalez-le aux communes, mais tant qu'elles ne changent pas ou n'annulent pas un nom, il n'y a aucune raison que ce soit nous qui le fassions. Le 3 juillet 2018 à 20:17, a écrit : > Et ça ne vous dérange pas d'écrire Marre avec deux R alors que

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Lieux-dits fantoir

Encore une fois l'orthographe vient du cadastre. Les variations sont reprises telles quelles. Je trouve aussi des rues dont l'orthographe change selon le côté (pas la même commune), les deux communes auant aussi des lieux-dits comportant ce nom dedans avec leur orthographe propre à chaque commune.

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Lieux-dits fantoir

oui mais ils sont référencés par les deux communes sous des noms différents. donc un point par commune chacun sa référence sur son terrain. Le 3 juillet 2018 à 20:04, marc marc a écrit : > Le 03. 07. 18 à 19:26, djakk djakk a écrit : > > ça vous semble logique un lieu-dit sur une 2*2 voies > >

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Lieux-dits fantoir

Et ça ne vous dérange pas d'écrire Marre avec deux R alors que le lieu-dit à côté a classiquement un seul r ? Vérifié sur le terrain ? 35189B285F PRE DE LA MARRE (Montgermont) 35278B633X

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Lieux-dits fantoir

Le 03. 07. 18 à 19:26, djakk djakk a écrit : > ça vous semble logique un lieu-dit sur une 2*2 voies cela arrive :) parfois des échangeurs portent le nom du lieu-dit qui existait avant leur construction. Rien ne nécessite qu'un lieu dit soie vierge de route. > ou en doublon ? tu parles de

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Lieux-dits fantoir

Ce n'est pas un doublon, c'est un lieu dit FANTOIR qui existe sous deux noms légèrement différents entre deux communes (rien que pour ça, conserver les deux noms évite de confondre l'un avec l'autre et permet aussi de localiser ce qui n'est pas pas facile à trouver autrement qu'en regardant le

Re: [Talk-us] named links

There are some cases where naming link roads makes sense. For example, I tag the roads coming out of roundabouts as link roads (especially if it's something like a residential road intersecting, a note important road like a secondary road, and I tag the slip roads for that leg of the roundabout as

[OSM-talk-fr] Lieux-dits fantoir

Salut ! Question : ça vous semble logique un lieu-dit sur une 2*2 voies ou en doublon ? Moi pas :P Philippe Verdi les a ajouté parce que présents dans Fantoir ou dans le cadastre. Pour moi c’est de l’administratif périmé qui n’a pas sa place dans osm ...

Re: [Talk-us] named links

While I don't have "a dog in this fight," I also read our wiki which says "Link roads NORMALLY do not have names." (Emphasis mine). In the unusual (abnormal?) cases where they do (and I trust Paul wouldn't have added them unless they do), there is no contradiction with our wiki, rather an

Re: [OSM-ja] ローマ字

On 07/03/2018 12:44 PM, tomoya muramoto wrote: > ひらがな→name:ja-Hira > ローマ字→name:ja-Latn > 漢字かな交じり→name 分かりました。ありがとう！論理的です。だけど、「name:ja-Hira」と「name:ja-Latn」は同じ情報を伝えませんか。

Re: [OSM-talk] [HOT] Why the HOT obsession with low quality buildings in Africa ?

On Tue, July 3, 2018 3:56 pm, mohamet lamine Ndiaye wrote: > I am Mohamet Lamine Ndiaye [..] Nangadef, I'm happy to hear from you - it has been a long time ! > [..] I think this is the umpteenth time we talk about it Yes, this is a pet issue of mine - I hope that one day I'll understand why you

Re: [OSM-talk] [HOT] Why the HOT obsession with low quality buildings in Africa ?

On Tue, July 3, 2018 10:46 am, Rupert Allan wrote: > > [..] 'some data being better than no data' [..] Yes but, in that case, landuse combined with density and/or building type attributes do the job more cheaply and with none of the low quality stigma. But, of course, there may be other reasons

[Talk-GB] New Data in PRoW Comparison Tool

I've just added another county -- East Sussex -- to my PRoW Comparison Tool: http://robert.mathmos.net/osm/prow/progress/east-sussex/ I've also been doing a bit of updating of my table of council Rights of Way Open Data at http://robert.mathmos.net/osm/prow/open-data/ . Apart from the lines with

Re: [OSM-talk] proposed mechanical edit - moving FIXME=* to fixme=*

Hi On 03/07/2018 13:27, Tom Pfeifer wrote: On 03.07.2018 14:21, Dave F wrote: it should be updated when the object is touched individually anyway, thus not spoiling the history There's no difference doing it that way or with a bulk edit  - it will still be recorded in the history..  and

Re: [OSM-ja] ビルのインポート（GSI)

三浦さん、今晩は。 分かりました。残念ですね… とにかく、ありがとうございます！ レオ On 07/03/2018 09:38 PM, Miura Hiroshi wrote: > 今晩は。 > > GSIの規約と私達の契約のもと、ツールによるインポートはできません。 > > トレースと現地の調査で最新の情報にする手順です。 > > 三浦 > > 2018年7月3日(火) 21:35 Leo Gaspard : > >> 皆様、 >> >> もう一度質問があってすみません。 >> >> iDでJapan GSI Standard >> >>

Re: [OSM-ja] ローマ字

レオ様 ちょうど解決されたようでなりよりですが、実は少しnameタグの定義があいまいです。 日本のタグ定義はJapan taggingに基本的な取り決めが記載されています。 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Japan_tagging 昨年、歴史的に使用されている`name:ja_rm`を`name:ja-Latn`に変更しようという議論がありました。しかし明確な合意には至らず、Japan taggingは`name:ja_rm`のままです。

Re: [OSM-ja] ビルのインポート（GSI)

今晩は。 GSIの規約と私達の契約のもと、ツールによるインポートはできません。 トレースと現地の調査で最新の情報にする手順です。 三浦 2018年7月3日(火) 21:35 Leo Gaspard : > 皆様、 > > もう一度質問があってすみません。 > > iDでJapan GSI Standard > > Mapを見て、それを使ってビルを手でインポートします。ですけど、もしそれを無人化できれば、すごいだろうと思います。フランスでは、JOSMのプラグイン[1]はありますから希望がありますけど｡｡｡？ > > 迷惑をかけてすみません。 > レオ > > > [1]

Re: [OSM-talk] proposed mechanical edit - moving FIXME=* to fixme=*

On 03/07/2018 12:33, Tom Pfeifer wrote: On 03.07.2018 12:44, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: Not skill but knowledge - that fixme and FIXME have exactly the same meaning > I hoped that that in this case there will be no controversy at all and this minor duplication On 03.07.2018 12:52, Dave F

[OSM-ja] ビルのインポート（GSI)

皆様、 もう一度質問があってすみません。 iDでJapan GSI Standard Mapを見て、それを使ってビルを手でインポートします。ですけど、もしそれを無人化できれば、すごいだろうと思います。フランスでは、JOSMのプラグイン[1]はありますから希望がありますけど｡｡｡？ 迷惑をかけてすみません。 レオ [1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:JOSM/Greffons/Cadastre-fr （今まで決して使いませんでしたが｡｡｡）

Re: [OSM-talk] proposed mechanical edit - moving FIXME=* to fixme=*

On 03/07/18 13:21, Dave F wrote: Removes duplicated, reduces confusion, easier to search. A good Spring clean improves the database. I really think this fear of bulk edits has gone too far. I would probably ask just how many of the tags you think are duplicated? The point here is that there

Re: [OSM-talk] proposed mechanical edit - moving FIXME=* to fixme=*

On 03/07/2018 11:44, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: 3. Lipiec 2018 12:26 od t.pfei...@computer.org :  > Removing the FIXME tag reduces the learning curve for map editors. What specific skill is to be learned here? Not skill but knowledge - that fixme and

Re: [OSM-talk] proposed mechanical edit - moving FIXME=* to fixme=*

On 03.07.2018 14:21, Dave F wrote: it should be updated when the object is touched individually anyway, thus not spoiling the history There's no difference doing it that way or with a bulk edit  - it will still be recorded in the history.. It is a major difference! Doing the mechanical

Re: [OSM-ja] ローマ字

> POIの名前を記入する時、どう書きますか？漢字で、平仮名で、ローマ字で？どれも？検索が易しいようにどれも入れたいですが、iDの「Translation」のメニューに「日本語」しかないから、どうすればいいか考えています。 あ〜　https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Key:name:ja　を見て自分に答えられました。 時間を無駄に使って、申し訳ありません。 レオ On 07/03/2018 12:20 AM, Leo Gaspard wrote: > はじめまして！ > >

Re: [OSM-talk] proposed mechanical edit - moving FIXME=* to fixme=*

On 03/07/2018 12:35, Tom Pfeifer wrote: On 03.07.2018 13:22, Dave F wrote: Great, but why the objection to a mechanical edit, rather than individually? Doing it one by one still updates the last_modified attribute. it should be updated when the object is touched individually anyway, thus

Re: [Talk-cz] Kontrola uctu pro fotky rozcestniku

Ahoj, to je jedna z veci, co uz jsem udelal (kde to bylo zrejme), viz: https://openstreetmap.cz/git/tom.k/PhotoDB2/src/master/import.php od radku 116. Bye Dne 3. července 2018 14:13 Mikoláš Štrajt napsal(a): > Zdar, > během svého působení jsem se přejmenoval ze "Severák" na "Severak" (měl jsem

Re: [OSM-talk] proposed mechanical edit - moving FIXME=* to fixme=*

Hi Maarten On 03/07/2018 10:38, Maarten Deen wrote: On 2018-07-03 11:23, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: 3. Lipiec 2018 10:36 od md...@xs4all.nl: What will prevent users from adding FIXME tags in the future? Nothing, users may add any tags. It is impossible to change that by edits. Then the

Re: [Talk-cz] Kontrola uctu pro fotky rozcestniku

Zdar, během svého působení jsem se přejmenoval ze "Severák" na "Severak" (měl jsem za to, že dlouhé á způsobuje určité technické chyby). Tudíž část fotek má "Severák" a část "Severak". Zajímavé ale je, že v té importní tabulce jsou všechy fotky uvedeny u mě (je jich jen 9). -- Severák

Re: [OSM-talk] proposed mechanical edit - moving FIXME=* to fixme=*

On 03.07.2018 13:22, Dave F wrote: Great, but why the objection to a mechanical edit, rather than individually? Doing it one by one still updates the last_modified attribute. it should be updated when the object is touched individually anyway, thus not spoiling the history with unnecessary

[Talk-cz] Kontrola uctu pro fotky rozcestniku

Ahoj, vzhledem k tomu, ze walleyho system pro fotky dlouhodobe nefunguje tak, aby byl pro mne pouzitelny a s walleym se nejsem schopen dohodnout na nejake zmene, rozhodl jsem se udelat si system vlastni (aka PhotoDB2). Prvnim krokem pro import stavajicich dat je jejich uvedeni do stavu, kdy jsou

Re: [OSM-talk] proposed mechanical edit - moving FIXME=* to fixme=*

On 03.07.2018 12:44, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: Not skill but knowledge - that fixme and FIXME have exactly the same meaning > I hoped that that in this case there will be no controversy at all and this minor duplication On 03.07.2018 12:52, Dave F wrote: > All the editors need to be checked

Re: [OSM-talk] proposed mechanical edit - moving FIXME=* to fixme=*

Hi Michael... On 03/07/2018 00:23, Michael Reichert wrote: Hi Mateusz, Am 02.07.2018 um 19:42 schrieb Mateusz Konieczny: Please comment - especially if there are any problems with this idea. Please also comment if you support this edit, in case of no response at all edit will not be made as

Re: [OSM-talk] proposed mechanical edit - moving FIXME=* to fixme=*

Hi You beat me to it! I haven't read the whole thread. I came across this irritating anomaly last week & thought it would be good to update. That there are entities with both variations indicates a problem within the database & is not a valid reason to not amend. All the editors need to be

Re: [OSM-talk] proposed mechanical edit - moving FIXME=* to fixme=*

3. Lipiec 2018 12:26 od t.pfei...@computer.org : >  > Removing the FIXME tag reduces the learning curve for map editors. > What specific skill is to be learned here? Not skill but knowledge - that fixme and FIXME have exactly the same meaning. > On

[Talk-lt] Pastatai 2018

Sveiki Naujas įrašas apie pastatų OpenStreetMap kiekį. Palyginimas su GDR'u: https://blog.openmap.lt/2018/07/02/pastatai-2018/ Jei imtume plotus, pažymėtus kaip landuse=residential, kurie neturi nei vieno pastato (kandidatai vietų, kur trūksta pastatų), tai gauname tokius lyderiaujančius

Re: [OSM-talk] proposed mechanical edit - moving FIXME=* to fixme=*

On 03.07.2018 11:48, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: see http://taghistory.raifer.tech It [FIXME] was quickly growing up to 2013, slowed later and and since 2017 usage is decreasing. Fine, so let it die peacefully. Interestingly, 'FIXME' behaves more naturally, while 'fixme' shows a lot of import

Re: [OSM-talk] proposed mechanical edit - moving FIXME=* to fixme=*

On 03.07.2018 04:33, Jason Remillard wrote:> ... and I was quite surprised to find that FIXME> (an invalid key) was so prevalent in the database. Who declared the uppercase version invalid? Where is the discussion to deprecate it? The English fixme wiki page still declares "Alternate forms

Re: [Talk-it-trentino] Sviluppo app navigatore per osm

Per me OK. Ci vediamo. > Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2018 09:02:48 +0200 > > From: Alessandro Vitali > To: OpenStreetMap Italy regional talk list for Trentino - Lista > regionale del Trentino > Subject: Re: [Talk-it-trentino] Sviluppo app navigatore per osm > Message-ID: > >

Re: [OSM-talk] proposed mechanical edit - moving FIXME=* to fixme=*

3. Lipiec 2018 11:38 od md...@xs4all.nl : > On 2018-07-03 11:23, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: >> 3. Lipiec 2018 10:36 od >> md...@xs4all.nl >> : >> >>> What will prevent users from adding FIXME tags in the future? >> >> Nothing, users may add any tags.

Re: [OSM-talk] proposed mechanical edit - moving FIXME=* to fixme=*

On 2018-07-03 11:23, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: 3. Lipiec 2018 10:36 od md...@xs4all.nl: What will prevent users from adding FIXME tags in the future? Nothing, users may add any tags. It is impossible to change that by edits. Then the proposed mechanical edit is useless. It will have to be

Re: [OSM-talk] proposed mechanical edit - moving FIXME=* to fixme=*

3. Lipiec 2018 10:36 od md...@xs4all.nl : > What will prevent users from adding FIXME tags in the future? Nothing, users may add any tags. It is impossible to change that by edits.   > What happens to the tools that read FIXME tags in the meanwhile? Tools that

[Talk-GB] MapThePaths update: live edit of designation and prow_ref

Hi, Another update to MapThePaths - you can now perform live OSM edits of the designation and prow_ref tags of ways. You need to login with your OSM account, select 'Edit' and then zoom in to the highest level. The live OSM data is overlaid on the council data when in live edit mode -

Re: [Talk-GB] MapThePaths - updates

OK. Will modify MapThePaths to show the parish ID as well as the actual reference number. Nick From: Roger Calvert Sent: 02 July 2018 19:20:20 To: Nick Whitelegg; talk-gb@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] MapThePaths - updates Thanks, Nick. In fact

Re: [Talk-it-trentino] Sviluppo app navigatore per osm

Scusate intervengo solo ora. Noi (vvf) usiamo questo tablet da un anno. lo sviluppatore della app di emergenza che poi attiva il navigatore permette più scelta. Noi abbiamo usato per un bel po' Waze. Ed in centrale la cartografia di riferimento è OSM (su mia richiesta) La gestione del dato

Re: [OSM-talk] proposed mechanical edit - moving FIXME=* to fixme=*

On 03/07/18 09:28, Frederik Ramm wrote: On 02.07.2018 19:42, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: It would make development of QA tools easier as authors would not need to discover and implement support for this duplicated key. I think the downsides of such a large mechanical edit far outweigh the

Re: [OSM-talk] proposed mechanical edit - moving FIXME=* to fixme=*

Ed wrote: > though perhaps notes make more sense than hiding things in tags and instead > of changing case the proposal should be to extract the FIXME's to notes to > increase their visibility. For me notes are often much less informative than fixme tags. Because the fixme tag is on the

Re: [OSM-talk] proposed mechanical edit - moving FIXME=* to fixme=*

On 2018-07-03 09:49, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: Now that I know about existence of FIXME tag I can add support for it in my tools at 1% of cost of going through mechanical edit. The entire point is not to support may particular usecase, the point is to save people in future from spending time on

Re: [OSM-talk] proposed mechanical edit - moving FIXME=* to fixme=*

Hi, On 02.07.2018 19:42, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > It would make development of QA tools easier as authors would not need to > discover and implement support for this duplicated key. I think the downsides of such a large mechanical edit far outweigh the advantages. Don't forget that new FIXMEs

Re: [OSM-talk] proposed mechanical edit - moving FIXME=* to fixme=*

Mateusz wrote: > Also, OSM Inspector anyway is not useful at all for offline tag listing on > map > during survey, on a phone (my particular usecase). Funnily enough I've added FIXME tags when out surveying with my phone (Vespucci). FIXME pre-dates the fixme wiki proposal (if you dig out the

Re: [Talk-GB] MapThePaths - updates

Sorry, I mean to say we need a way to tag this 'name format' (official_name perhaps? Or prow_name...) Kind regards, Adam On 3 July 2018 at 09:09, Adam Snape wrote: > Hi, > > Very. very few Defiunitive statements include arcane numeric references > like that. They almost always use the parish

Re: [Talk-GB] MapThePaths - updates

Hi, Very. very few Defiunitive statements include arcane numeric references like that. They almost always use the parish name and path number eg. Newton Footpath 1. I think we really this 'name' format as it is something we could consistently do nationally. Kind regards, Adam On 2 July 2018 at

Re: [OSM-ja] State of the Map Japan 2018 参加登録開始！

ぞあ.@OSMFJです。 ribbonさん、なおやさん、ご指摘ありがとうございます。 イベントサイトにあるタイムテーブルのスタイルを修正しました。 イベントサイトをご覧いただいた方にはご不便をおかけしましたがタイムテー ブルの幅がブラウザのウィンドウ幅を超えないようになっているかと思います。 皆様、ぜひ日比谷でお会いしましょう。 On 2018/07/02 22:53, なおや wrote: ribbonさん なおやです。 私も見られませんでした。 表示を何回か縮小して全体が見られるようになりました。 mac / chrome です。 ご参考まで。

Re: [OSM-talk] proposed mechanical edit - moving FIXME=* to fixme=*

3. Lipiec 2018 01:23 od osm...@michreichert.de : > > What's the benefit in this mechanical edit? It just sets the > last_modified attribute to a recent date and data consumers, mappers and > QA tools get the impression that the object is not old. > - removes

[Talk-us] Talks and Scholarship Submissions Extended SOTM-US

Hi All, We've extended the call for participation and scholarships until July 14th for SOTM-US. http://2018.stateofthemap.us/ State of the Map US is an annual gathering of volunteers, mappers, organizations and businesses who collaborate and work with OpenStreetMap. This year we are getting