way, it seems to leave the old
segment in place, so you have to find that in JOSM and delete it;
If it's doing that then it's a bug, but I'm pretty sure it isn't
anymore.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB
and use the results.
I'm not sure if npemaps queries FTP in real time though, or if they
have a cached copy of the FTP database that might be out of date?
Tom
--
Tom Hughes ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tom Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tom Chance [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's the status of this? I've put about lots of codes around my area
into FreeThePostcode, but when I search for my flat's code
guessed, you haven't made your edits public.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk-gb
Line when I was tidying that up.
It should be railway=subway of course, not railway=rail.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman
. It is purely about establishing a z-ordering for
objects. If it's in a tunnel we should say so explicitly.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin
cats on the list in terms of dates, but ideas for
locations appreciated.
Have a +1 from me for that idea.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org
in Somerset when visiting my parents, both
in the immediate area and primary/secondary roads around them
including some NPE tracing. The overlaps a bit into Devon and
Dorset as well as they're quite close to the edge of Somerset.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.compton.nu
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mike Paley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Being ignorant, I don't know what the capabilities and limitations of GPX
files are. Apart from tracks, will they take waypoints and routes ?
They can, yes. We only use tracks though.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes ([EMAIL
soon I believe, and that is SiRF III.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk-gb
.
The full extent of his handiwork can be got here:
http://www.informationfreeway.org/api/0.5/*[osm:user=Applewach]
The only thing I can think is that the user changed their name
and xapi has the old one still?
Tom
--
Tom Hughes ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.compton.nu
in one day.
If you're like to be doing anything at the weekend then I can probably
lend a hand.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin
so you can't relate the
points to each other or find out who they came from.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk-gb
to be
flying out to the US for three weeks on the Monday...
So would anyone be interested in my place? I've already paid so would be
ideal if I could get that back from you if possible.
Snap.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.compton.nu
on
the tractor/combine which uses the difference to correct it's own
calculated position.
What that allows you to do is to compensate for inaccuracy caused by
local atmospheric conditions as you are generating a correction based on
a local base station.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http
probably manage one day as well.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
it as the limit is nearly always signed as well these
days but the rule about street lights has never been rescinded as far as
I know.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http
|track|road
With the rest of the stuff split out:
Do you think that, just possibly, having to change the tagging on every
single road in the database to implement your scheme might make it just
a tad impractical...
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://www.compton.nu
Steve Chilton wrote:
I am afraid I don't know the answer. Yahoo surely have all the imagery, but
presumably have chosen to release this random coverage to OSM.
Eh? We're using their standard imagery, not some special OSM released
subset...
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http
was doing 28 yesterday, unless he changed his
mind about what to do?
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://www.compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
was that we should use tertiary for any grid roads
that aren't primary/secondary and not use it at all within the blocks in
general - just use unclassified for the more major roads in the blocks.
What do other people think?
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://www.compton.nu
as distributor roads and internal roads in each block
which are only intended for getting in to/out of that block from the
nearest grid road.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://www.compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http
be for
mapnik to render loc_ref.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://www.compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
.
I'm interested, depending on dates etc.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://www.compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
are close enough together that is.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://www.compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
at that just now I see that the relation for that
branch has been extended all the way down to Broxbourne station rather
than terminating at Broxbourne Junction where it joins the main line and
I'm wondering if that is the best thing to do?
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://www.compton.nu
Peter Miller wrote:
On 5 Jun 2009, at 10:19, Tom Hughes wrote:
Incidentally, looking at that just now I see that the relation for
that branch has been extended all the way down to Broxbourne station
rather than terminating at Broxbourne Junction where it joins the main
line and I'm
paper it has in it. The way to influence that
is to use the page/printer setup options in your browser and/or
operating system.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://www.compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http
to a new page.
That's entirely a browser thing though, so different browsers may not do
exactly the same thing.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://www.compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http
it produce better
output then please do so...
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://www.compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
On 05/08/09 14:47, Ciarán Mooney wrote:
Is it possible to publish the IP addresses he is making the edits
from?
No.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://www.compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http
shown as the A102 for the whole
length from the junction with the A12/A13 to the north to the junction
with the A2 to the south.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://www.compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http
On 27/08/09 11:05, Tom Hughes wrote:
In fact I can't find any map which shows either the tunnel or the
approach roads as the A102(M) - they all shown as the A102 for the whole
length from the junction with the A12/A13 to the north to the junction
with the A2 to the south.
I have now found
definition of trunk (ie the roads to be tagged as highway=trunk)
is wider and includes everything which is part of the Primary Route
Network, ie all green signed A roads.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://www.compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
his account, not his IP address.
***PLEASE*** PULL THE PLUG ON HIM!
I have repeatedly stated that I am not prepared to block people on my
own. Get the DWG to order him blocked and I will happily do so.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://www.compton.nu
On 18/09/09 11:26, David Earl wrote:
On 18/09/2009 10:53, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 18/09/09 10:33, David Earl wrote:
***PLEASE*** PULL THE PLUG ON HIM!
I have repeatedly stated that I am not prepared to block people on my
own. Get the DWG to order him blocked and I will happily do so.
How
the code to enforce such a block then we'd have that
option.
It sounds like an interesting option to have.
Matt is working on some stuff along those lines at the moment I believe,
which is what I was alluding to in my earlier message.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http
, no ;-)
The actually boundaries are still locked up however so it's not very
useful as it's just a hierarchical list of authorities.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://www.compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http
from DfT a few
years back.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://www.compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
...
This is interesting though:
Data relating to electoral and local authority boundaries as well as
postcode areas would be released for free re-use...
Do OS even have an (unencumbered) data set for postcode areas?
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://www.compton.nu
wrote the
government press release assume that the OS had the data and could be
made to release it but that one of the things the consultation will
establish is that they don't/can't.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://www.compton.nu
On 18/12/09 22:03, Matt Amos wrote:
the wiki currently has the meetup set for the john snow on tuesday[1].
how do people feel about moving that to wednesday?
Definitely not for me as I shall be in Somerset by then.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://www.compton.nu
all documented on the wiki at:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Provisional/First_Edition#Use
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://www.compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo
to use is documented clearly in the wiki.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://www.compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
road references are nationally unique. It seems
both plausible and implausible at the same time.
I don't believe they are - in fact each authority has it's own numbering
scheme for such roads. Some just use Cxxx, some use Cxxx and Dxxx, some
use Uxxx and so on.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t
= the Fosse
Clearly you've mistaken it for the A429 then ;-)
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
the 11 diverges from 1 somewhere and goes to Stansted rather
than Cambridge?
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
, although it does have green signs.
Have you merged trunk and primary?
That user was correct - in OSM we use highway=trunk for all primary A
roads (those with green signs) and highway=primary for all other A roads
(those wth white signs).
This is documented in many places in he wiki.
Tom
--
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
,
and walking the streets is at least half the fun of OSM!
As Andy says, I say we start with getting boundary data fixed up from
Boundary Line and then look at Vector Map District in a month's time and
decide what the next step is.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu
. Bit like osm.org really.
There is a viewer on the OS web site (when you can get in). Obviously we
will need to set up WMS or something for tracing of certain layers as well.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing
of the
roads in Harlow exist but are unnamed because nobody has taken up the baton.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
necessary to make JOSM work.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
.
It looks horribly complicated to setup though.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
a
set of large tiffs in OSGB projection which would have to be chopped up
into tiles.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
mention. I can't imagine anybody much was buying it to be
honest.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
/euvr_QbtL--?m
Which just happens to be the location of the local delivery office ;-)
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
On 13/04/10 09:57, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 13/04/10 09:49, Roger Slevin wrote:
I can assure you there are postcodes which represent postboxes which is why
Codepoint has a flag for them - but this quite important flag is not present
in Codepoint Open. The PO Box number is something completely
On 14/04/10 11:11, Ed Avis wrote:
Tom Hughest...@... writes:
Sorry, replied to the wrong list...
Which list has this endlessly fascinating postbox discussion?
The uk-government-data-developers list.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu
on improving county
boundaries might be a good place to start.
Ideally they also need to be done as relations and share ways with
adjacent ones. Indeed it would be good if they shared ways with any
existing features (such as rivers) where appropriate...
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http
On 29/04/10 09:15, Tom Taylor wrote:
Seems to be live now (at the bottom):
https://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/opendatadownload/products.html
Yes - I am currently downloading all the files to the dev server.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu
On 29/04/10 11:28, Emilie Laffray wrote:
On 29 April 2010 09:26, Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu
mailto:t...@compton.nu wrote:
On 29/04/10 09:15, Tom Taylor wrote:
Seems to be live now (at the bottom):
https://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/opendatadownload/products.html
in the same way the VMD release was not announced.
The version on http://os.openstreetmap.org/data is the new one with both
the 2009 and 2010 data in.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB
but simply that if you exercise your right to view
it then you're likely to be shown a paper version.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo
) was agreeing to sort out the
derived data issues so there should be something happening.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
feed for a particular area.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/910918
These will all suffer from a similar problem.
Could I suggest possibly adding place=civil parish (or something
similar) and not including this in the name.
Sure, and what's with all the _SHOUTY_TAGS_WITH_UNDERSCORES_ shit?
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t
that the names shouldn't be rechecked where there is a
conflict - they're simply saying that it is daft to remove the current
name before the resurvey has been done.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB
=private to the non-public roads would be a good start.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
why Hertfordshire's gazetteer often seems to
disagree with the OS about names ;-)
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
On 23/08/10 12:46, Jim Avery wrote:
Forgive me if I'm missing something staring me in the face, but where
do I find the new TCs and how do I sign up to them should I decide I
want to?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/terms
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu
stands with regard to the new CTs?
Now you're assuming that the CTs are not compatible with OpenData, a
question which has yet to be resolved - some people believe that they
are compatible.
Now please, take the legal debates back to legal-talk and stop trying to
move them around.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes
existing sources
like the PAF and the NLPG and they won't want to see their income
streams disappear so will lobby hard against you.
Certainly it's absolutely nothing to do with the OFT as far as I know.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu
to an
appropriate license then you shouldn't be using it.
You should not confuse data being available to you (whether under
FOIA, or the Highways Act or whatever) with the question of what
rights attach to that data and hence what you can or can't do with it.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http
description I heard anybody come up with was that it was an aqueduct but
it's hardly a typical aqueduct.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
up
will search the OpenData postcode data (and various other postcode
databases for other countries) directly anyway.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http
centroids are not real like that - in fact postcodes are not
defined in a geographic way at all. Rather they are defined by lists of
addresses. The centroid (and the bounding polygons that you sometimes
see) are then generated algorithmically from the locations of those
addresses.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes
the
map messages after working for an hour or so. This would have involved
a fair download as I was moving fast over the territory.
That will be your problem - you have probably hit the bandwidth limit.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu
anything for a while it
will automatically back off.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
On 02/02/11 15:50, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 02/02/11 15:31, Chris Moss wrote:
Is this what you're referring to, or something else? What is time limit
on it? 1 hour, 24 hours, what?
It's essentially a rate limit - it allows you to download data
continuously at a certain rate
came along and just blindly copied in the OS names thus making it
impossible to tell what I still needed to go and check!
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http
providers use OSM data or is this likely in the future?
E.g. if Peter Miller's proposal for subjective data to be gathered in
some way?
Yes - Skobler use it to start with.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
.
Tags:
FIXME:nsl = inferred single-carriageway NSL - remove this tag once verified
source:maxspeed = UK:nsl_single
I'm also curious as to what this UK:nsl_single source is? Does he have
some sort of list of roads subject to the NSL?
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu
.
Which means he is clearly in violation of point 3 discuss your plans
of the automated edits code of conduct:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits/Code_of_Conduct
Not to mention point 4 as well...
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu
let me know.
It's complaining about:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/89803436
with the following:
Could not convert one of 6A or 6D to an integer
but addr:interpolation is alphabetic so I think what it there is fine?
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu
at [3].
They're for things like freepost addresses and other specialised
delivery arrangements for large companies.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
is on a
different layer to the surrounding roads.
Even better, the railway there is now on the same layer as the road but
there is no bridge or level crossing marked so arguably it is now worse
than it was before then the layering was right but the bridge was missing.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http
claim some sort of intellectual property rights over the
data in that table and hence people have generally used algorithmic
approximations to avoid licensing issues.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk
(and normally, I think
I'm more cautious than most about such issues).
See my other posting - the issue is that the best version of the
mapping to OSGB relies on a large data table. It is not just an
algorithmic conversion.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu
authority so yes, they probably do appear eccentric to people outside
that authority.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
of Passenger Info at NRE...
Sounds similar to the one RichardF saw at Charlbury a while back...
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
;-)
Secondly, assuming that you actually used the right domain, then what is
the email address or username involved, as I can't see any account under
the gmail address you sent your mail from.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu
wait for each page to load
as you move from message to message.
I know which model I prefer thanks.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo
On 21/07/11 11:01, Craig Loftus wrote:
Additionally (some) Boris' Bike stations are grouped into a network
relation, with each station having the role rental_station.
Which is, of course, wrong. Relations are not categories people.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu
errors.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/blocks/64
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
)?
Surely you just leave it there but change it to access=private or
whatever...
As and when you find a legitimate way to map the real public footpath
you can add that in separately.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB
.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
to look at the logs.
Will do. Can I provide this to you Tom directly rather than on the list?
Sure.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
there is an
authority but it's boundary does not match what the man on the clapham
omnibus would regard as the area of the town.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org
1 - 100 of 207 matches
Mail list logo
