Re: [Talk-transit] Proposed Feature - 2nd RFC - Public Transport

2011-01-10 Per discussione Michał Borsuk
On 11 January 2011 07:24, Dominik Mahrer (Teddy) te...@teddy.ch wrote: Hi all One month ago I already posted an RFC on this proposal. In the meantime I got plenty of comments and I have extended/corrected/rewritten nearly the whole proposal. Please visit again

Re: [talk-ph] Allowed uses of map

2011-01-10 Per discussione maning sambale
License FAQ here: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Legal_FAQ#I_would_like_to_use_OpenStreetMap_maps._How_should_I_credit_you.3F In my opinion, a full web address: www.openstreetmap.org is better. Slightly off, I find it weird for a Navy HQ a few kilometers away from the coastline (but that's

Re: [OSM-talk] amenity=Observatory OR amenity=astronomical_observatory

2011-01-10 Per discussione Toby Murray
With all the complaints about the amenity tag being overloaded already, this seems like a good opportunity to avoid doing it more. Toby On Jan 9, 2011 5:35 PM, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote: On 09/01/2011 21:06, marcellobil...@gmail wrote: Hi all, just a question for all the community

Re: [OSM-talk] address parsing by nominatim

2011-01-10 Per discussione Vikas Yadav
On 10 January 2011 00:45, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.comwrote: 2011/1/9 ヴィカス ヤダヴァ (vikas yadav) mevi...@gmail.com: I surveying from Northern India. I studied how addresses are to be tagged in order so nominatim can locate it. That went great. The problem is the every house

Re: [OSM-talk] highway=unsurfaced

2011-01-10 Per discussione SomeoneElse
On 09/01/2011 20:17, Dave F. wrote: On 09/01/2011 16:28, Gorm E. Johnsen wrote: Hi Today there is 5500 ways with highway=unsurfaced... Whilst the surface condition should be a sub-tag (surface=*), you unfortunately don't know what the actual road classification is, so it's inadvisable to

Re: [OSM-talk] address parsing by nominatim

2011-01-10 Per discussione Gregory Arenius
It sounds like the current set of tags and structures in OSM don't properly support what you're trying to do at the moment. I think the best way to deal with it would to propose some new tags so that these type of addressing schemes can be properly supported in OSM with supporting documentation.

Re: [OSM-talk] address parsing by nominatim

2011-01-10 Per discussione vikas yadav
Neither block or sector are OSM places. I have used halmet/locality and suburb. by these, rendering is proper if using the existing system could i propose addr:hamlet or addr:suburb support? Also, rendering probably is fine. Its just how gazetteer/nominatim search algo that would require

Re: [OSM-talk] address parsing by nominatim

2011-01-10 Per discussione Jacek Konieczny
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 04:04:51PM +0530, ヴィカス ヤダヴァ (vikas yadav) wrote: Neither block or sector are OSM places. I have used halmet/locality and suburb. by these, rendering is proper if using the existing system could i propose addr:hamlet or addr:suburb support? And why not

Re: [OSM-talk] address parsing by nominatim

2011-01-10 Per discussione M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
2011/1/10 Vikas Yadav vi...@thevikas.com: On 10 January 2011 00:45, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote: 2011/1/9 ヴィカス ヤダヴァ (vikas yadav) mevi...@gmail.com: I surveying from Northern India. I studied how addresses are to be tagged in order so nominatim can locate it. That

Re: [OSM-talk] App bar at cloudmade routingservice

2011-01-10 Per discussione Tom Hughes
On 10/01/11 10:22, Maarten Deen wrote: Since a while now, cloudmade has some kind of app bar on the bottom of their routing map [1]. IMHO this is quite annoying as it takes up a whole chunck of the screen for which you get nothing worthwhile in return. Does anyone know how to remove this

Re: [OSM-talk] address parsing by nominatim

2011-01-10 Per discussione Brian Quinion
2) We so many times have blocks or sectors (tagged as locality or hamlet) OK - this sounds like a combination of bad tagging and software problems with nominatim and the mapnik style sheet. Can I suggest that locality and hamlet are probably not the correct tags and that you need to come up

Re: [OSM-talk] address parsing by nominatim

2011-01-10 Per discussione vikas yadav
I used hamlet for my block as pop limit of 1000 is given = satisfied I used suburb for it is neither a village or a town but holds 2 ~ 10 blocks = suggest We do have villages within cities and they have been tagged properly, villages never have sub areas or blocks. Therefore, sectors are not

Re: [OSM-talk] App bar at cloudmade routingservice

2011-01-10 Per discussione Maarten Deen
On Mon, 10 Jan 2011 11:05:28 +, Tom Hughes wrote: On 10/01/11 10:22, Maarten Deen wrote: Since a while now, cloudmade has some kind of app bar on the bottom of their routing map [1]. IMHO this is quite annoying as it takes up a whole chunck of the screen for which you get nothing

Re: [OSM-talk] address parsing by nominatim

2011-01-10 Per discussione Pierre-Alain Dorange
Vikas Yadav vi...@thevikas.com wrote: locality is the way i could properly render blocks and sectors right now in OSM india. please suggest if there is a better/proper way achieving the same render result. z12: http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=28.408lon=77.0776zoom=12layers=M - you can

[OSM-talk] Semantics layer for tags

2011-01-10 Per discussione Martijn van Exel
Hi all, There was a presentation about something like this at the last SOTM, but I can't remember who did it. Please chime in. I was talking to a friend just now about mobile editors for OSM and soon enough the discussion shifted towards general usability issues for OSM. A major one for me has

Re: [OSM-talk] Semantics layer for tags

2011-01-10 Per discussione M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
2011/1/10 Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org: ... is in cultural and language differences. What constitutes a trunk road in Lithuania? What is a chemist in Spain? Not all tags even translate one to one. Ideally we would have a semantic layer between the user and the database / API. This layer

Re: [OSM-talk] amenity=Observatory OR amenity=astronomical_observatory

2011-01-10 Per discussione Steve Bennett
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 7:24 PM, Toby Murray toby.mur...@gmail.com wrote: With all the complaints about the amenity tag being overloaded already, this seems like a good opportunity to avoid doing it more. Don't we have an amenity=research_centre? Make it a subtag of that, perhaps? tl;dr:

Re: [OSM-talk] highway=unsurfaced

2011-01-10 Per discussione Alex Mauer
On 01/09/2011 12:01 PM, Richard Fairhurst wrote: No. highway=unsurfaced could be what's now commonly tagged as highway=track, or highway=unclassified, or highway=bridleway. Only one of those three is a road. Which one were you thinking of? I count two road types in your list: highway=track

Re: [OSM-talk] Semantics layer for tags

2011-01-10 Per discussione Martijn van Exel
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 2:50 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote: 2011/1/10 Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org: ... is in cultural and language differences. What constitutes a trunk road in Lithuania? What is a chemist in Spain? Not all tags even translate one to one. Ideally

Re: [OSM-talk] talk Digest, Vol 77, Issue 26

2011-01-10 Per discussione Richard Welty
On 1/10/11 12:19 AM, John Smith wrote: On 10 January 2011 02:04, Richard Weltyrwe...@averillpark.net wrote: not just in theory: George Washington Bridge, connecting NYC with New Jersey. and it's not a minor bridge, it is rather a pretty significant one in the traffic grid. so you can't really

Re: [OSM-talk] highway=unsurfaced

2011-01-10 Per discussione Richard Fairhurst
Alex Mauer wrote: Which one were you thinking of? I count two road types in your list: highway=track and highway=unclassified. And it could be other highway=* types too. highway=track doesn't imply a road round here; clearly YMV. It’s still better to use highway=road even if it turns

Re: [OSM-talk] Semantics layer for tags

2011-01-10 Per discussione Ed Avis
Martijn van Exel m at rtijn.org writes: This is just an example, but you will have these assumptions for most of the tags: for the local mapper they are included, but on a global basis they won't be valid. The meaning of a tag is somehow always dependent on the cultural background / area.

Re: [OSM-talk] highway=unsurfaced

2011-01-10 Per discussione Anthony
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote: Alex Mauer wrote: Which one were you thinking of?  I count two road types in your list: highway=track and highway=unclassified.  And it could be other highway=* types too. highway=track doesn't imply a road

Re: [OSM-talk] talk Digest, Vol 77, Issue 26

2011-01-10 Per discussione John Smith
On 11 January 2011 03:21, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net wrote: umm, i just provided a concrete example why the adjective theoretical was not correct in characterizing Nathan's concern. I never said there were no exceptions, however they are just that, exceptions not the rule which is

Re: [OSM-talk] Semantics layer for tags

2011-01-10 Per discussione Gianfra g
Most of the things you are discussing about can be done in the LinkingOpenData (LOD) environment where you have ontologies dealing with almost every kind of human knowledge. In the LOD there are already several linguistic resources, some of them multilingual.I already developed and tested the

Re: [OSM-talk] Semantics layer for tags

2011-01-10 Per discussione Peter Wendorff
Am 10.01.2011 18:11, schrieb Martijn van Exel: Yes, that is exactly where a semantic layer would come in! For example, I would tag a feature in a semantics-enabled JOSM in my native language, Dutch, as provinciale weg. A lookup in the ontology would expose an ambiguity: a provincial road could

Re: [OSM-talk] talk Digest, Vol 77, Issue 26

2011-01-10 Per discussione Richard Welty
On 1/10/11 12:59 PM, John Smith wrote: On 11 January 2011 03:21, Richard Weltyrwe...@averillpark.net wrote: umm, i just provided a concrete example why the adjective theoretical was not correct in characterizing Nathan's concern. I never said there were no exceptions, however they are just

Re: [OSM-talk] highway=unsurfaced

2011-01-10 Per discussione Alex Mauer
On 01/10/2011 11:27 AM, Richard Fairhurst wrote: Alex Mauer wrote: Which one were you thinking of? I count two road types in your list: highway=track and highway=unclassified. And it could be other highway=* types too. highway=track doesn't imply a road round here; clearly YMV. Sounds

Re: [OSM-talk] Semantics layer for tags

2011-01-10 Per discussione Martijn van Exel
(forgot to copy to talk) On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 6:35 PM, Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com wrote: Martijn van Exel m at rtijn.org writes: This is just an example, but you will have these assumptions for most of the tags: for the local mapper they are included, but on a global basis they won't be

Re: [OSM-talk] Semantics layer for tags

2011-01-10 Per discussione Richard Weait
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 8:25 AM, Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org wrote: Hi all, There was a presentation about something like this at the last SOTM, but I can't remember who did it. Please chime in. You might be remembering David Earl's talk, Tag Central Slides

Re: [OSM-talk] Semantics layer for tags

2011-01-10 Per discussione Martijn van Exel
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 7:29 PM, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote: On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 8:25 AM, Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org wrote: Hi all, There was a presentation about something like this at the last SOTM, but I can't remember who did it. Please chime in. You might be

Re: [OSM-talk] highway=unsurfaced

2011-01-10 Per discussione Richard Fairhurst
Alex Mauer wrote: Sounds like the usage is wrong “round there” then. The example image on the wiki[1] clearly shows a road http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Fr%C3%BChlingslandschft_Aaretal_Schweiz.jpg I think if you described that as a road in the UK you'd have the Trades Descriptions

Re: [OSM-talk] highway=unsurfaced

2011-01-10 Per discussione john
American usage would be to refer to that as a road, just not a very high-quality road. I take it that, in Britain, there are certain minimum standards for being called a road? ---Original Email--- Subject :Re: [OSM-talk] highway=unsurfaced From :mailto:rich...@systemed.net Date :Mon

Re: [OSM-talk] Semantics layer for tags

2011-01-10 Per discussione Ed Avis
Martijn van Exel m at rtijn.org writes: The user would be able to tag a feature with chemist, pharmacy, farmacia or apotheek and that would result in the same coding in the OSM database (currently: shop=chemist). Rather than typing in the name and hoping that it matches in the translation layer,

Re: [OSM-talk] Semantics layer for tags

2011-01-10 Per discussione M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
2011/1/10 Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org: (forgot to copy to talk) On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 6:35 PM, Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com wrote: Martijn van Exel m at rtijn.org writes: The latter. The user would be able to tag a feature with chemist, pharmacy, farmacia or apotheek and that would

Re: [OSM-talk] Semantics layer for tags

2011-01-10 Per discussione Martijn van Exel
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 6:51 PM, gianfranco gliozzo gfrem...@gmail.com wrote: Most of the things you are discussing about can be done in the LinkingOpenData (LOD) environment where you have ontologies dealing with almost every kind of human knowledge. In the LOD there are already several

Re: [OSM-talk] highway=unsurfaced

2011-01-10 Per discussione Tom Hughes
On 10/01/11 19:00, j...@jfeldredge.com wrote: American usage would be to refer to that as a road, just not a very high-quality road. I take it that, in Britain, there are certain minimum standards for being called a road? Nothing official, but it would be very unusual for anybody to call

Re: [OSM-talk] Semantics layer for tags

2011-01-10 Per discussione Gianfra g
Yes Martijn there are weak classifications, everything that is not mapped is not represented in the database. For example the classification in five groups of tags and in the subgroups in the map feature list is not expressed in the database. OSM database is missing

Re: [OSM-talk] highway=unsurfaced

2011-01-10 Per discussione Greg Troxel
Anthony o...@inbox.org writes: On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote: Alex Mauer wrote: Which one were you thinking of?  I count two road types in your list: highway=track and highway=unclassified.  And it could be other highway=* types too.

Re: [OSM-talk] address parsing by nominatim

2011-01-10 Per discussione Brian Quinion
2011/1/10 ヴィカス ヤダヴァ (vikas yadav) mevi...@gmail.com: I used hamlet for my block as pop limit of 1000 is given = satisfied I used suburb for it is neither a village or a town but holds 2 ~ 10 blocks = suggest We do have villages within cities and they have been tagged properly, villages never

Re: [OSM-talk] How do I get higher-resolution imagery in JOSM?

2011-01-10 Per discussione Alan Mintz
At 2011-01-07 06:43, Nathan Edgars II wrote: Both Yahoo and Bing have nice imagery in the Orlando area: http://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?lat=28.417946lon=-81.491858zoom=20 http://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?editor=potlatch2lat=28.417946lon=-81.491858zoom=20 But I cannot get JOSM to load this

Re: [OSM-talk] Landsat WMS is dead

2011-01-10 Per discussione Elizabeth Dodd
On Mon, 10 Jan 2011 01:27:11 +0100 Chris Browet c...@semperpax.com wrote: Just out of curiosity, where is Landsat more detailed than Bing or Yahoo? - Chris - plenty of places near me ie western NSW, australia where there is no nearmap coverage nearmap then defaults to landsat, so I am

Re: [OSM-talk] address parsing by nominatim

2011-01-10 Per discussione Stephen Hope
2011/1/10 ヴィカス ヤダヴァ (vikas yadav) mevi...@gmail.com: I used hamlet for my block as pop limit of 1000 is given = satisfied The problem here is that population is only part of the definition of a hamlet. Less than 1000 people is correct, but it also has an implied and is surrounded by open

Re: [OSM-talk-nl] weekbulletin

2011-01-10 Per discussione Martijn van Exel
Frank, Ik heb gezien dat je regelmatig meeschrijft, natuurlijk :) Het leek alleen een beetje ingezakt de laatste week, vandaar maar even een mailtje naar de lijst. Kun jij vandaag publiceren? Martijn Martijn van Exel +++...@rtijn.org laziness – impatience – hubris http://schaaltreinen.nl | 

[OSM-talk-nl] MappersBabbel Amsterdam

2011-01-10 Per discussione Martijn van Exel
Hoi allemaal, Dit jaar komt er weer een maandelijkse MappersBabbel in Amsterdam. Elke derde dinsdag van de maand. De eerste is dus volgende week dinsdag, de 18e, in café Skek. Vanaf 19:00 Zie je dan! http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Amsterdam#Maandelijkse_MappersBabbel Martijn van Exel

Re: [OSM-talk-nl] weekbulletin

2011-01-10 Per discussione Frank Fesevur
Ik zal hem in mijn pauze publiceren. Gegroet, Frank Op 10 januari 2011 09:13 heeft Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org het volgende geschreven: Frank, Ik heb gezien dat je regelmatig meeschrijft, natuurlijk :) Het leek alleen een beetje ingezakt de laatste week, vandaar maar even een mailtje

[OSM-talk-nl] verwijdering van maillijst

2011-01-10 Per discussione Peter Willems
Helaas heb ik zojuist vanuit een verkeerd emailadres gemaild. Willen jullie dit (peter-will...@xs4all.nl) emailadres van de maillijst verwijderen? Nogmaals met dank, Peter Willems ___ Talk-nl mailing list Talk-nl@openstreetmap.org

Re: [OSM-talk-nl] verwijdering van maillijst

2011-01-10 Per discussione Martijn van Exel
Zie hier http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-nl Martijn van Exel +++...@rtijn.org laziness – impatience – hubris http://schaaltreinen.nl | http://martijnvanexel.nl | http://oegeo.wordpress.com/ twitter / skype: mvexel flickr: rhodes 2011/1/10 Peter Willems peter-will...@xs4all.nl:

[OSM-talk-nl] Weekbulletin week 2011/1 gepubliceerd

2011-01-10 Per discussione Frank Fesevur
Hallo, Ik heb zojuist de weekbulletin van de afgelopen week gepubliceerd. http://blog.openstreetmap.nl/index.php/2011/01/10/weekbulletin-%E2%80%93-week-1-3-%E2%80%93-9-januari-2011/ Voor iedereen die wil meehelpen met het vullen van ons aller weekbulletin: Plaats je tekst in dit document en dan

[OSM-talk-nl] Fwd: correctie

2011-01-10 Per discussione Frank Heinen
Wie kan dit even oplossen voor deze beste man. Tnx alvast. -- Doorgestuurd bericht -- Van: Pedorpedor pedorpe...@hotmail.com Datum: 4 jan 2011 20:06 Onderwerp: correctie Aan: webmas...@openstreetmap.nl Beste mensen, Ik zag dat jullie in de kaart van Nieuwkoop een straatnaam

[OSM-talk-nl] MappersBabbel Amsterdam

2011-01-10 Per discussione Martijn van Exel
Hoi allemaal, in tegenstelling tot eerdere aankondiging wordt de Amsterdamse Mappersbabbel niet op elke derde dinsdag, maar op elke derde *donderdag* van de maand gehouden. Dit om verwarring / concurrentie met prinsjesdag in september te voorkomen. De eerste is dus komende donderdag 20 januari,

Re: [OSM-talk-nl] Fwd: correctie

2011-01-10 Per discussione Paul Smits
Mooie woorden Op 10 januari 2011 20:03 schreef Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org het volgende: Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach a man to fish and you feed him for a lifetime. Martijn van Exel +++ m...@rtijn.org laziness – impatience – hubris http://schaaltreinen.nl |

Re: [OSM-talk-nl] Fwd: correctie

2011-01-10 Per discussione Rob
moet je wel van vis houden ;) Op 10 januari 2011 21:05 schreef Paul Smits paul.l.sm...@gmail.com het volgende: Mooie woorden Op 10 januari 2011 20:03 schreef Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org het volgende: Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach a man to fish and you feed him

[Talk-is] Örfyrirlestrar á morgun þriðjuda g

2011-01-10 Per discussione Björgvin Ragnarsson
Á morgun þriðjudag ætla ég að halda 5 mínútna kynningu um hjólavefsjá á ensku: https://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=174126615957948. Líklega ekkert sem þið vitið ekki þegar en kannski er annað á dagskránni sem gæti vakið áhuga. Allir velkomnir kv. Björgvin Ragnarsson

Re: [Talk-de] Tankstellendach - große Dächer allge mein

2011-01-10 Per discussione Jan Tappenbeck
Am 07.01.2011 23:30, schrieb Wolfgang: Hallo, wie würdet ihr das Dach taggen, unter dem die Fahrzeuge tanken? Building = yes mit Garage oder Tunnel finde ich unpassend. Gruß, Wolfgang Hi ! wenn wir schon bei den Dächern sind - wie seht Ihr das mit sehr großen Dächern ??? gruß jan :-)

[Talk-de] [talk-de] Geofabrik-Mirror klemmt

2011-01-10 Per discussione Henning Scholland
Hallo, mir ist gerade aufgefallen das der Geofarik-Mirror [1] noch die Daten vom 08.01. beherbergt. Is da was kaputt gegangen? Viele Grüße, Henning [1] http://ftp5.gwdg.de/pub/misc/openstreetmap/download.geofabrik.de/ ___ Talk-de mailing list

[Talk-de] gmapsupp.img abspecken?

2011-01-10 Per discussione Christian Knorr
Hallo zusammen, ich habe die aktuellste Europa AiO [1] runter geladen, und sie ist zu groß für meine 4GB-Karte. Soweit ich weiß, könnte ich die Einzellayer runter laden und als eine Datei speichern - ich weiß zwar nicht wie, hatte ich aber mal irgendwo gelesen. Kann ich denn vorher auch aus der

Re: [Talk-de] Hausnummern bei Wohnblocks

2011-01-10 Per discussione M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
Am 9. Januar 2011 11:58 schrieb Robert S. osm-m...@autobahnen-europa.eu: 2011/1/9 M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com +1, es werden m.E. da besser 2 Häuser, die aneinandergebaut sind, gezeichnet. I.d.R. sind die beiden Häuser nämlich statisch ebenfalls unabhängig (besitzrechtlich sind

Re: [Talk-de] unpräzise Beschreibung von access im Wiki

2011-01-10 Per discussione M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
Am 9. Januar 2011 14:33 schrieb Georg Feddern o...@bavarianmallet.de:   * /nach Nutzung/       * agricultural       * forestry       * emergency http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:emergency=*       * hazmat http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:hazmat=* ... M. E. ist der Begriff nach

Re: [Talk-de] unpräzise Beschreibung von access im Wiki

2011-01-10 Per discussione Simon Poole
Ich hab jetzt nicht nachgeschaut wie das genau geregelt ist in Deutschland, aber in der Schweiz ist es so, dass jeweils der landwirtschaftlicher Verkehr gestattet ist, und der ist nur von der Nutzung abhängig und nicht vom Fahrzeugtyp (man könnte also durchaus auch mit dem Ferrari die

Re: [Talk-de] kreative gpx-tracks

2011-01-10 Per discussione Heiko Jacobs
Am 09.01.2011 20:42, schrieb Frederik Ramm: Ich vermute, das war aus der Zeit, als man mit Potlatch noch keine lokalen Dateien oeffnen konnte. Daher musste man alles hochladen, was man im Potlatch sehen wollte. Mit Potlatch2 ist das aber nicht mehr der Fall. Und auch in P1 kann man Wegepunkte

Re: [Talk-de] Geofabrik-Downloads jetzt als Binaerformat

2011-01-10 Per discussione Steffen Wolf
Steffen Wolf schrieb: Frederik Ramm schrieb: Steffen Wolf wrote: Ich moecht nur schnell der Aussage widersprechen, dass das PBF-Format generell schneller verarbeitbar ist. Spaetestens aber, wenn Du irgendeine Art von Weiterverarbeitung mit dem lesenden Programm machst, wirst Du einen

Re: [Talk-de] unpräzise Beschreibung von access im Wiki

2011-01-10 Per discussione Georg Feddern
Moin, Simon Poole schrieb: Ich hab jetzt nicht nachgeschaut wie das genau geregelt ist in Deutschland, aber in der Schweiz ist es so, dass jeweils der landwirtschaftlicher Verkehr gestattet ist, und der ist nur von der Nutzung abhängig und nicht vom Fahrzeugtyp (man könnte also durchaus

Re: [Talk-de] GPS-Genauigkeit prüfen

2011-01-10 Per discussione Markus
Hallo Tirkon, In der Elektrotechnik nutzt man bei schwankenden Messwerten die Durchschnittsbildung über mehrere Messwerte Ich habe mein Gerät mal über Nacht rausgelegt. Ergebnis: 600 Messwerte in 10 Stunden. Das möchte ich gern mit Excel grafisch darstellen. Also habe ich den Durchschnitt

[Talk-de] Per Straßenname den Stadtteil herausfind en

2011-01-10 Per discussione ben
Hallo! Ich habe einen Datensatz mit 1000 Adressen (Straße, Nummer, PLZ) und möchte gerne herausfinden wieviel davon in welchem Stadtteil liegen. Ist sowas mit (dem aktuellen Datenstand von) OSM möglich? Wenn ja, wie? Ich hab gesehen, dass z.B. hier in Leipzig die Stadtteile nur mit einem Punkt

Re: [Talk-de] Per Straßenname den Stadtteil herausfind en

2011-01-10 Per discussione Philip Gillißen
Hallo! Probier mal die Webservices von Geonames.org [1]. Die sind unter einer CC-Lizenz veröffentlicht und nutzen afaik auch OSM-Daten. Z.B. der Cities-Webservice scheint richtig für deine Anwendung zu sein... Gruß, Philip [1]: http://www.geonames.org/export/ws-overview.html -- View this

Re: [Talk-de] gmapsupp.img abspecken?

2011-01-10 Per discussione fla...@googlemail.com
Theoretisch klappt das mit GMT. Mit der AIO-Karte hab ich das vor einiger Zeit mal gemacht. Und die einzelenn imges dann mit mkgmap zusammengefügt. ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de

Re: [Talk-de] Status Aktion 11

2011-01-10 Per discussione Tom Müller
Kann man so ein Projekt auch mal für den Vietnam anstoßen? Mir sind da in Hanoi einige nicht verbundene Straßen aufgefallen! Danke Tom Am 09.01.2011 11:58, schrieb Rainer Kluge: Hallo Gary, Am 08.01.2011 20:30, schrieb Gary68: Nach 24h sind 17 von 36 Paketen abgearbeitet Inzwischen sind

[Talk-de] Dein Post

2011-01-10 Per discussione fx99
schick mal die Daten an f...@vollbio.de Ich mach Dir das Excel (97) Gruss Harald ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de

Re: [Talk-de] Per Straßenname den Stadtteil herausfind en

2011-01-10 Per discussione Thomas Reincke
Am 10.01.2011 17:01, schrieb ben: Hallo! Ich habe einen Datensatz mit 1000 Adressen (Straße, Nummer, PLZ) und möchte gerne herausfinden wieviel davon in welchem Stadtteil liegen. Ist sowas mit (dem aktuellen Datenstand von) OSM möglich? Wenn ja, wie? Ich hab gesehen, dass z.B. hier in Leipzig

Re: [Talk-de] Status Aktion 11

2011-01-10 Per discussione Hartmut Holzgraefe
On 01/10/2011 06:23 PM, Tom Müller wrote: Kann man so ein Projekt auch mal für den Vietnam anstoßen? Mir sind da in Hanoi einige nicht verbundene Straßen aufgefallen! Du kannst Dir die entsprechenden Fehler auch mit KeepRight anzeigen lassen und bearbeiten:

Re: [Talk-de] Dein Post

2011-01-10 Per discussione Johannes Huesing
f...@vollbio.de f...@vollbio.de [Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 07:15:51PM CET]: schick mal die Daten an f...@vollbio.de Ich mach Dir das Excel (97) Sorry, das Listenprogramm munscht den Absender. -- Johannes Hüsing There is something fascinating about science.

Re: [Talk-de] Per Straßenname den Stadtteil herausfind en

2011-01-10 Per discussione M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
Am 10. Januar 2011 19:21 schrieb Thomas Reincke m...@thomas-reincke.de: Es gibt m.E. nicht mal überall eine klare und eindeutige Definition was ein Stadtteil überhaupt ist. +1. Ein Stadtteil ist ein Teil einer Stadt mit Namen, das muss nicht mit einer Verwaltungseinheit in Zusammenhang

Re: [Talk-de] [OT] Garmin etrax vista schaltet sich ab

2011-01-10 Per discussione Ulf Lamping
Am 10.01.2011 22:29, schrieb Elchtreiber: Eventuell kann man mal versuchen, eine Stelle zu bestimmen, wo das Gerät gerne ausgeht. Das könnte man dann als Garmin-Bermudadreieck bei OSM eintragen ;-) Gruß, ULFL ___ Talk-de mailing list

Re: [Talk-de] Per Straßenname den Stadtteil herausfind en

2011-01-10 Per discussione ben
Ok, sowas hatte ich mir schon gedacht. Vielen Dank für eure Hilfe, ben 2011/1/10 M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com: Am 10. Januar 2011 19:21 schrieb Thomas Reincke m...@thomas-reincke.de: Es gibt m.E. nicht mal überall eine klare und eindeutige Definition was ein Stadtteil

Re: [Talk-de] [OT] Garmin etrax vista schaltet sich ab

2011-01-10 Per discussione Johann H. Addicks
Am 10.01.2011 22:29, schrieb Elchtreiber: Ein Fehler in der Stromversorgung kann ich eigentlich, wie Du ja auch, ausschliessen. Ist einem Freund von mir auch schon passiert, da kam die Versorgung per 12V in das Gerät, da kann es kein Batteriewackelkontakt sein. Letzteres ja, ersteres nicht.

Re: [Talk-de] ??Reit- und Wanderkarte - Jahresrück blick

2011-01-10 Per discussione Johannes Huesing
Sven Geggus li...@fuchsschwanzdomain.de [Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 04:21:35PM CET]: [...] Am besten ändern wir das Kürzel GR irgendwie auf ein englischsprachiges Pendant LT für Long Distance Trail oder sowas und dokumentieren an prominenter Stelle, dass wir GR nicht verwenden dürfen weil [TM].

Re: [Talk-de] gmapsupp.img abspecken?

2011-01-10 Per discussione Christian Knorr
Am Montag 10 Januar 2011, um 18:13:52 schrieb fla...@googlemail.com: Theoretisch klappt das mit GMT. Was ist GMT? Das Wiki brauchst Du da gar nicht zu fragen [1] ;) Mit der AIO-Karte hab ich das vor einiger Zeit mal gemacht. Und die einzelenn imges dann mit mkgmap zusammengefügt. Danke für die

Re: [Talk-it] funny signs

2011-01-10 Per discussione Luca Delucchi
Il 10 gennaio 2011 01:25, Michael von Glasow mich...@vonglasow.com ha scritto: Assolutamente... ho già aggiunto una curiosità che avevo incontrato io. PS: guardando il nome dell'altro immagine mi chiedo se siamo solo noi crucchi a vedere queste cose...? Sarà che siamo troppo pignoli... le

Re: [Talk-it] funny signs

2011-01-10 Per discussione Fabrizio Tambussa
Ho messo 4 mie foto, spero vi piacciano. Saluti Fabrizio Il giorno 10 gennaio 2011 09:47, Luca Delucchi lucadel...@gmail.com ha scritto: Il 10 gennaio 2011 01:25, Michael von Glasow mich...@vonglasow.com ha scritto: Assolutamente... ho già aggiunto una curiosità che avevo incontrato io.

[Talk-it] Agriturismo

2011-01-10 Per discussione MorSi
Ciao come si tagga un agriturismo che fa da mangiare e ha camere da letto ma no ha carattere di hotel??? Grazie Simone Morandi ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

Re: [Talk-it] Agriturismo

2011-01-10 Per discussione Federico Cozzi
2011/1/10 MorSi mo...@inwind.it: come si tagga un agriturismo che fa da mangiare e ha camere da letto ma no ha carattere di hotel??? tourism=guest_house Ciao, Federico ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Talk-it] Agriturismo

2011-01-10 Per discussione MorSi
Ok, ma oltre a tourism=guest_house anche amenity=restaurant? Simone Morandi 2011/1/10 MorSi mo...@inwind.it: come si tagga un agriturismo che fa da mangiare e ha camere da letto ma no ha carattere di hotel??? tourism=guest_house Ciao, Federico

Re: [Talk-it] Agriturismo

2011-01-10 Per discussione M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
2011/1/10 MorSi mo...@inwind.it: Ok, ma oltre a tourism=guest_house anche amenity=restaurant? decidi te. Se ti sembra un ristorante, aggiungi lo... ciao, Martin ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Talk-it] Agriturismo

2011-01-10 Per discussione Carlo Stemberger
Il 10/01/2011 14:15, MorSi ha scritto: Ok, ma oltre a tourism=guest_house anche amenity=restaurant? In realtà gli agriturismi (quelli veri) andrebbero taggati in modo diverso: sono innanzitutto aziende agricole; solo che al momento non si è ancora deciso sul come procedere. Tutti i

Re: [Talk-it] Agriturismo

2011-01-10 Per discussione Damjan Gerli
Carlo Stemberger, on 10/01/2011 14.52, wrote: Il 10/01/2011 14:15, MorSi ha scritto: Ok, ma oltre a tourism=guest_house anche amenity=restaurant? In realtà gli agriturismi (quelli veri) andrebbero taggati in modo diverso: sono innanzitutto aziende agricole; solo che al momento non si è

Re: [Talk-it] Agriturismo

2011-01-10 Per discussione Carlo Stemberger
Il 10/01/2011 15:29, Damjan Gerli ha scritto: Qui stà scritto quello che è stato deciso un annetto fà: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Italy/TODO#Agriturismi Ottimo! Grazie! Non mi ricordavo più. Andrebbe spostato da TODO ad una pagina più consona. Ciao! Carlo -- .' `.

Re: [Talk-co] debemos aceptar odbl o se perderan los datos?

2011-01-10 Per discussione Ricardo R
¿como puedo deshacer en mi perfil la edicion de dominio publico y dejar solo la odbl? From: harrie...@hotmail.com To: talk-co@openstreetmap.org Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 07:52:31 -0500 Subject: [Talk-co] debemos aceptar odbl o se perderan los datos? Hi, I've seen that you haven't accepted

Re: [Talk-co] Quién está trabajando en el Geocoder de Colombia?

2011-01-10 Per discussione Jaime Mejia
Hola, estoy un poco embolatado y aun no he puesto el demo, pero entonces adjunto para compartir con ustedes el código que hemos elaborado ya que conceptualmente es el mismo principio que expone Pilar. ... bueno, también le falta mucho por comentar, pero espero que les pueda dar una idea mientras

[Talk-co] Fwd: [Talk-es] CORINE y ODbL

2011-01-10 Per discussione ouɐɯnH
-- Forwarded message -- From: Iván Sánchez Ortega i...@sanchezortega.es Date: 2011/1/10 Subject: [Talk-es] CORINE y ODbL To: Discusión en Español de OpenStreetMap talk...@openstreetmap.org A las buenas, Me pasan una nota los chicos de la OSMF encargados de hacer las estadísticas

Re: [Talk-co] debemos aceptar odbl o se perderan los datos?

2011-01-10 Per discussione Rodrigo Castiblanco
No he visto que se pueda hacer eso. 2011/1/10 Ricardo R harrie...@hotmail.com ¿como puedo deshacer en mi perfil la edicion de dominio publico y dejar solo la odbl? -- From: harrie...@hotmail.com To: talk-co@openstreetmap.org Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 07:52:31

Re: [Talk-es] ITACyL 3D e imágenes 2010

2011-01-10 Per discussione Iván Sánchez Ortega
On Saturday 08 January 2011 01:01:13 Marco Fernández wrote: Coñas a parte, también he visto por aquí [1] que se han actualizado los cuadrantes NW y SE, con imágenes de 2010. ¿Esto puede indicar que las imágenes de PNOA también se van a actualizar, o no tiene nada que ver? Las ortos de las

Re: [Talk-es] Buscando webs de POIs

2011-01-10 Per discussione Iván Sánchez Ortega
On Saturday 08 January 2011 15:10:24 jynus wrote: Las dos licencias anteriormente nombradas indican que se debe permitir cualquier uso, incluído los comerciales, por lo que *yo* entiendo que no es posible. Que la fundación no cobre por los datos y los ponga gratuítamente a disposición de todos

Re: [Talk-es] Spanish 4th anniversary party

2011-01-10 Per discussione Iván Sánchez Ortega
On Friday 07 January 2011 13:46:10 Jonas Andradas wrote: Buenas, ¿se sabe de lugares propuestos por el IGN ya? Yo pensaba que nos los propondrían, pero que no lo habían hecho aún. No es del IGN, pero se le acerca bastante: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Jaén_Mapping_Party Desde mi punto

[Talk-es] CORINE y ODbL

2011-01-10 Per discussione Iván Sánchez Ortega
A las buenas, Me pasan una nota los chicos de la OSMF encargados de hacer las estadísticas de aceptación de la ODbL, antes de hacer el cambio definitivo CC-by-sa - ODbL dentro de dos meses y medio (31 de marzo). Ergo, aviso a navegantes: en las estadísticas ha saltado que en España parte de

Re: [Talk-es] Uso de SIG nomecalles en OSM

2011-01-10 Per discussione Iván Sánchez Ortega
On Sunday 09 January 2011 03:18:00 jynus wrote: Lo cual podría dar a entender que la información de nomecalles, que lo gestiona el propio IECM, debería seguir una política de uso similar Nunca está de más asegurarse al 100%. De hecho es la política general del proyecto. Exacto. Por eso voy

Re: [Talk-es] Spanish 4th anniversary party

2011-01-10 Per discussione Jaume Figueras
Hola, On 01/10/2011 03:40 PM, Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote: No es del IGN, pero se le acerca bastante: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Jaén_Mapping_Party Desde mi punto de vista, el sarao de Jaén puede ser un punto de partida para las parties IGN-sponsored. Ya, pero la reunión OSM-es se

Re: [Talk-es] Uso de SIG nomecalles en OSM

2011-01-10 Per discussione José Luis Domingo López
El lunes día 10 de enero de 2011, a las 16:31:46 +0100, Iván Sánchez Ortega escribió: Exacto. Por eso voy a buscar una persona de contacto del IECM para ver si se puede mover este tema por la asociación OSM España. Aunque seguro que ya lo has visto, por si acaso, en el visor en cuestión la

Re: [Talk-es] Spanish 4th anniversary party

2011-01-10 Per discussione andrzej zaborowski
2011/1/10 Jaume Figueras jaume.figue...@masafi.cat: Jajajaj... Las Maite-Guitarras molaron. Maite dice que te llegaron al alma jajajaj y con la actuación final Henk-Iván nos sacamos una pasta... :P:P:P Eso es que los proyectos libres tambien tienen modelo de negocio. :)

[Talk-es] Correccion del zoom

2011-01-10 Per discussione Hector
creo que el zoom es este.Perdon http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=42.648968lon=-6.057447zoom=18layers=M http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=42.648968lon=-6.057447zoom=18layers=M ___ Talk-es mailing list Talk-es@openstreetmap.org

  1   2   >