end Talk-se mailing list submissions to talk-se@openstreetmap.org To
> subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-se or, via email, send a
> message with subject or body 'help' to talk-se-requ...@openstreetmap.org You
> can r
tiserat.*
>
>
>
> Men återigen, jag saknar lokalkännedom om det området.
>
>
>
>
>
> /Anders Andersson
>
>
>
>
>
> *Från:* John Bäckstrand
> *Skickat:* den 14 juni 2024 15:48
> *Till:* OpenStreetMap Sverige mailinglista
> *Kopia:* Per Geijer
>
att strandområdet upplevs som privatiserat.
Men återigen, jag saknar lokalkännedom om det området.
/Anders Andersson
Från: John Bäckstrand
Skickat: den 14 juni 2024 15:48
Till: OpenStreetMap Sverige mailinglista
Kopia: Per Geijer
Ämne: Re: [Talk-se] Talk-se Digest, Vol 177, Issue 5
Ja, det
åhittade restriktioner som allmänheten ska anpassa sig efter känns rätt
> sunkigt.
>
>
> /Anders Andersson
>
> -Ursprungligt meddelande-
> Från: Per Geijer
> Skickat: den 13 juni 2024 17:43
> Till: talk-se@openstreetmap.org
> Ämne: Re: [Talk-se] Talk-se Di
en 13 juni 2024 17:43
Till: talk-se@openstreetmap.org
Ämne: Re: [Talk-se] Talk-se Digest, Vol 177, Issue 5
Örjan Svane who is the person contacting us and demanding a map update is a
member of the Swedish FKK. I guess the following the path you will find
yourself surrounded by naked peop
Örjan Svane who is the person contacting us and demanding a map update is a
member of the Swedish FKK. I guess the following the path you will find
yourself surrounded by naked people.
https://www.scandinavianaturist.org/sv/node/367
Best rgds
//P
> 13 juni 2024 kl. 13:00 skrev talk-se-r
I Voted.
Tasauf.Ribin
On Sat, 17 Feb 2024, 10:57 Sawan Shariar, wrote:
> I voted
>
> On Fri, 16 Feb 2024, 6:03 pm , wrote:
>
>> Send Talk-bd mailing list submissions to
>> talk-bd@openstreetmap.org
>>
>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the Wo
I voted
On Fri, 16 Feb 2024, 6:03 pm , wrote:
> Send Talk-bd mailing list submissions to
> talk-bd@openstreetmap.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-bd
> or, via email, send a me
Absolutely amazing. Thank you Election Commission. Hope to see a very well
committee soon.
On Sun, 7 Jan 2024, 6:10 pm , wrote:
> Send Talk-bd mailing list submissions to
> talk-bd@openstreetmap.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>
Hello Mahtab Uddin,
Thank you for reaching us. Could you please share it in details with the
map link? We will take care of it as soon as possible.
Thanks
Sawan
On Fri, 26 May 2023, 3:56 am , wrote:
> Send Talk-bd mailing list submissions to
> talk-bd@openstreetm
on the wiki so that people know what decisions were made.
Dafo
Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows
From: Colm Moore
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2023 4:18:12 PM
To: Donal Hunt ; davefo...@hotmail.com
Subject: Re: [OS
ase and such datasets as the above will
ultimately be populated and maintained by the department.
Department of Transport and Planning (Victoria, Australia) - OpenStreetMap
Wiki
<https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Department_of_Transport_and_Planning_(Victoria,_Australia)>
On Thu, Feb 9,
; Don't be shy! See you there.
>
> Dian
>
> _______
> Talk-nz mailing list
> talk...@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-nz
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
Hello, Hrvoje!
Thanks for your answer. Whenever possible, we always use only local
satellite images as they show the most up to date information.
Best regards,
Sergey
On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 2:03 PM wrote:
> Talk-hr posaljite mailing list poruke na
> talk-hr@openstreetmap.org
He is actively clicking buttons right now, leave me alone while I take a look
at what he is doing
From:
talk-au-requ...@openstreetmap.org<mailto:talk-au-requ...@openstreetmap.org>
Sent: Tuesday, 3 May 2022 8:32 PM
To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org<mailto:talk-au@openstreetmap.org>
S
, object history, or other sources to confirm? There is no universe
where keeping that invalid relation was a good idea, and it was doing
nothing for routing whatsoever.
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org
to blindly makes edits
to it. Especially when the user is deleting other peoples work in the process
to simply flex is validator tool
From:
talk-au-requ...@openstreetmap.org<mailto:talk-au-requ...@openstreetmap.org>
Sent: Tuesday, 3 May 2022 10:36 AM
To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org<mailt
;
>
>
>
> *From: *talk-au-requ...@openstreetmap.org
> *Sent: *Tuesday, 3 May 2022 10:12 AM
> *To: *talk-au@openstreetmap.org
> *Subject: *Talk-au Digest, Vol 179, Issue 28
>
>
>
> Send Talk-au mailing list submissions to
> talk-au@openstreetmap.org
>
>
No it would not because its a one way road lmao
From:
talk-au-requ...@openstreetmap.org<mailto:talk-au-requ...@openstreetmap.org>
Sent: Tuesday, 3 May 2022 10:12 AM
To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org<mailto:talk-au@openstreetmap.org>
Subject: Talk-au Digest, Vol 179, Issue 28
Send Tal
> *Sent: *Tuesday, 3 May 2022 9:59 AM
> *To: *Anthony Panozzo
> *Cc: *Luke Stewart ;
> talk-au@openstreetmap.org
> *Subject: *Re: [talk-au] Talk-au Digest, Vol 179, Issue 13
>
>
>
> Hi Anthony,
>
>
>
> Below is a picture from the South Australian Road Rule
That picture is about an intersection not a T-intersection lmao
From: Dian Ågesson<mailto:m...@diacritic.xyz>
Sent: Tuesday, 3 May 2022 9:59 AM
To: Anthony Panozzo<mailto:pan...@outlook.com>
Cc: Luke Stewart<mailto:suburbansilvervl...@gmail.com>;
talk-au@openstreetmap.
From: Luke Stewart
Sent: Tuesday, 3 May 2022 9:52 AM
To: Anthony Panozzo
Cc: Dian Ågesson; talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Talk-au Digest, Vol 179, Issue 13
It is also acceptable from the point of view of the camera as stated in
the Road Rules.
On Tue, 3 May 2022 at 10:18, Antho
ailto:pan...@outlook.com>
Cc: Dian Ågesson<mailto:m...@diacritic.xyz>;
talk-au@openstreetmap.org<mailto:talk-au@openstreetmap.org>
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Talk-au Digest, Vol 179, Issue 13
It is also acceptable from the point of view of the camera as stated in the
Road Rules.
On
point of
> view of that picture and back
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Luke Stewart
> *Sent: *Tuesday, 3 May 2022 9:28 AM
> *To: *Anthony Panozzo
> *Cc: *Dian Ågesson ; talk-au@openstreetmap.org
> *Subject: *Re: [talk-au] Talk-au Digest, Vol 179, Issue 13
Yes at the median is fine, but not from where the point of view of that picture
is. TheSwavu has allowed u-turns starting from exactly the point of view of
that picture and back
From:
talk-au-requ...@openstreetmap.org<mailto:talk-au-requ...@openstreetmap.org>
Sent: Tuesday, 3 May 202
anozzo<mailto:pan...@outlook.com>
Cc: Dian Ågesson<mailto:m...@diacritic.xyz>;
talk-au@openstreetmap.org<mailto:talk-au@openstreetmap.org>
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Talk-au Digest, Vol 179, Issue 13
The intersection shown in mapillary without traffic lights
https://www.mapillary.com/a
breaks.
On Tue, 3 May 2022 at 09:52, Anthony Panozzo wrote:
> You are wrong, you can not do u-turns at t-intersections on a one way road
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Dian Ågesson
> *Sent: *Tuesday, 3 May 2022 8:39 AM
> *To: *Anthony Panozzo
> *Cc: *talk-au@open
You are wrong, you can not do u-turns at t-intersections on a one way road
From: Dian Ågesson<mailto:m...@diacritic.xyz>
Sent: Tuesday, 3 May 2022 8:39 AM
To: Anthony Panozzo<mailto:pan...@outlook.com>
Cc: talk-au@openstreetmap.org<mailto:talk-au@openstreetmap.org>
Subject:
10/s40.html
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
without question and you are happy to defend every single one
of his edits
From: talk-au-requ...@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Tuesday, 3 May 2022 8:16 AM
To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Talk-au Digest, Vol 179, Issue 13
Send Talk-au mailing list submissions to
talk-au@openstreetmap.org
To
the way you are replying to emails is incorrect, and
> has created several different threads:
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/2022-May/thread.html
>
> On Tue, 3 May 2022 at 08:52, Anthony Panozzo wrote:
>
>> This user is telling me I don’t even know the
plying to emails is incorrect, and
has created several different threads:
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/2022-May/thread.html
On Tue, 3 May 2022 at 08:52, Anthony Panozzo wrote:
> This user is telling me I don’t even know the road rules LMAO, and just to
> be clear again.
This user is telling me I don’t even know the road rules LMAO, and just to be
clear again... you are arguing this guy is free to click all the buttons
without question and you are happy to defend every single one of his edits
From:
talk-au-requ...@openstreetmap.org<mailto:talk-au-r
do a u-turn if there is
a sign permitting you to do so. You don’t have the understanding to be able to
blindly click buttons from this state,ent alone, and yet people will come to
your defence lmao
From:
talk-au-requ...@openstreetmap.org<mailto:talk-au-requ...@openstreetmap.org>
Sent: T
I am going to go through every single edit in Adelaide from this guy and report
each one individually here and his user page, the small vocal group that backs
this guy congrats your screwing the map!
From:
talk-au-requ...@openstreetmap.org<mailto:talk-au-requ...@openstreetmap.org>
s edit too.
From: talk-au-requ...@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Monday, May 2, 2022 11:54:34 PM
To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Talk-au Digest, Vol 179, Issue 6
Send Talk-au mailing list submissions to
talk-au@openstreetmap.org
To subscribe or unsubscri
.
From: Dean Scott
Sent: Monday, May 2, 2022 11:03:51 PM
To: Anthony Panozzo ; talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: Talk-au Digest, Vol 179, Issue 3
Hi, what section of road has TheSwavu allowed u-turns? If you are referring to
the intersection with traffic
ott...@outlook.com>
Sent: Monday, 2 May 2022 11:03 PM
To: Anthony Panozzo<mailto:pan...@outlook.com>;
talk-au@openstreetmap.org<mailto:talk-au@openstreetmap.org>
Subject: Re: Talk-au Digest, Vol 179, Issue 3
Hi, what section of road has TheSwavu allowed u-turns? If you are referring to
pm
To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Talk-au Digest, Vol 179, Issue 3
Reporting user TheSwavu |
OpenStreetMap<https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/TheSwavu>
2 hours ago he made this changeset Changeset: 120456255 |
OpenStreetMap<https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/
The u-turn restriction are only valid from 1 nodes at 2 nodes it allows
u-turns, I built waterloo corner road from one end the the other, this guy just
goes around clicking buttons lol.
From: talk-au-requ...@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Monday, May 2, 2022 10:53
3155>
> he has allowed u-turns
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> *From:* talk-au-requ...@openstreetmap.org <
> talk-au-requ...@openstreetmap.org>
> *Sent:* Monday, May 2, 2022 8:30:24 PM
> *To:* talk-au@openstreetmap.org
> *Subject:* Ta
owed u-turns
____
From: talk-au-requ...@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Monday, May 2, 2022 8:30:24 PM
To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Talk-au Digest, Vol 179, Issue 3
Send Talk-au mailing list submissions to
talk-au@openstreetmap.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
and bring up bus stops lmao.
From:
talk-au-requ...@openstreetmap.org<mailto:talk-au-requ...@openstreetmap.org>
Sent: Saturday, 30 April 2022 10:55 PM
To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org<mailto:talk-au@openstreetmap.org>
Subject: Talk-au Digest, Vol 178, Issue 57
Send Talk-au mailing list
as in error?
On Sat, 30 Apr 2022, 13:18 Anthony Panozzo, wrote:
> Im not it’s 100% true, youre the one taking the piss by jumping in this
> conversation and just speaking on behalf of the other person involved when
> the matter was already discussed and sorted. Please do not email me directl
Im not it’s 100% true, youre the one taking the piss by jumping in this
conversation and just speaking on behalf of the other person involved when the
matter was already discussed and sorted. Please do not email me directly
From:
talk-au-requ...@openstreetmap.org<mailto:talk-au-r
Can someone else please confirm that this guy is just taking the piss?
Cheers,
Luke
On Sat, 30 Apr 2022 at 21:58, Anthony Panozzo wrote:
> I didn’t realise you emailed me directly I am going to have to block you
> from doing so in the future, it’s against OSM au-talk
I didn’t realise you emailed me directly I am going to have to block you from
doing so in the future, it’s against OSM au-talk policy
From: Luke Stewart<mailto:suburbansilvervl...@gmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, 30 April 2022 9:21 PM
To: Anthony Panozzo<mailto:pan...@outlook.com>; OS
is also the case that you yourself broke
the relation (again, perhaps inadvertently), within 24 hours of first
adding it.
P.S., make sure to use 'reply all', so that the message gets cross-posted
to talk-au.
Cheers,
Luke
On Sat, 30 Apr 2022 at 21:03, Anthony Panozzo wrote:
> Luke,
>
>
&g
ly saying the validator told me so, it’s
>>> basically bot editing using that excuse, I will be watching all edits this
>>> guy makes from now on and will be reporting every single edit he makes that
>>> breaks routing to the DWG and by the report button itself on the user page,
>>> then he can explain himself there
&
edit he makes that
>> breaks routing to the DWG and by the report button itself on the user page,
>> then he can explain himself there
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> *From:* talk-au-requ...@openstreetmap.org <
>> talk-au-requ...@openstreetmap.org>
>> *Sent
editing using that excuse, I will be watching all edits this
> guy makes from now on and will be reporting every single edit he makes that
> breaks routing to the DWG and by the report button itself on the user page,
> then he can explain himself there
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------
user page, then he can explain himself there
____
From: talk-au-requ...@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2022 2:35:26 PM
To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Talk-au Digest, Vol 178, Issue 48
Send Talk-au mailing list submissions to
talk-au@openstr
t me, I do
not need to be worry about you and your tool coming along to destroy it.
I am not proff reading this so sorry if there are spelling errors!
From: talk-au-requ...@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Saturday, 30 April 2022 1:33 PM
To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Talk-au Digest, Vol 178, Issue 46
it will throw at me, I do not need to be worry about you and your tool
coming along to destroy it. I am not proff reading this so sorry if there are
spelling errors!
From:
talk-au-requ...@openstreetmap.org<mailto:talk-au-requ...@openstreetmap.org>
Sent: Saturday, 30 April 2022 1:33 PM
To: t
of the DWG.
PS Swavu is not a bot.
Cheers - Phil (tastrax)
From: Anthony Panozzo
Sent: Saturday, 30 April 2022 12:46 AM
To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Talk-au Digest, Vol 178, Issue 44
User TheSwavu
This account is either a bot account or someone that thinks
nder the bot edit policy or straight out vandalism!
From:
talk-au-requ...@openstreetmap.org<mailto:talk-au-requ...@openstreetmap.org>
Sent: Friday, 29 April 2022 8:32 PM
To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org<mailto:talk-au@openstreetmap.org>
Subject: Talk-au Digest, Vol 178, Issue 44
S
Great initiative.
On Fri, 22 Apr 2022, 5:04 pm , wrote:
> Send Talk-bd mailing list submissions to
> talk-bd@openstreetmap.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-bd
> or, via ema
Anthony wrote
"Creating new Bus Stop nodes
Is the consensus to remove the plaform tags from new nodes?"
I'm not sure I understand.
If you are creating a new bus stop node, then there won't be any tags to
remove, platform or otherwise.
_____
Creating new Bus Stop nodes
Is the consensus to remove the plaform tags from new nodes?
From: talk-au-requ...@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2022 10:30:11 PM
To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Talk-au Digest, Vol 175, Issue 22
Send Talk-au
purely on the advice from Ds5rUy and should have
this ability taken away and given to someone who is more objective, if that
vote and discussion I linked out weighs and talk here then he is 100% wrong
and made 54700 wrong edits
From: talk-au-requ...@openstreetmap.org
>
>> Ngah, should have replied to all. Not just you.
>>
>> talk...@openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
>>
>
___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
___
Talk-transit mailing list
Talk-transit@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
On 01/06/2021 19:37, Jarek Piórkowski wrote:
Why bother with OSM at all then? Just look at a Ordnance Survey map
and use your sentience to find what you're looking for.
OSM is free.
OSM is not a database sink.
DaveF
___
Talk-transit mailing
On Tue, 1 Jun 2021 at 13:34, Philip Barnes wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-06-01 at 13:07 -0400, Jarek Piórkowski wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 1, 2021, 12:38 Dave F via Talk-transit <
> > talk-transit@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> > > On 01/06/2021 16:11, Christopher Parker wrote
On Tue, Jun 1, 2021, 14:15 Dave F via Talk-transit <
talk-transit@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>
>
> On 01/06/2021 18:07, Jarek Piórkowski wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 1, 2021, 12:38 Dave F via Talk-transit <
> talk-transit@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>
>> On 01/
On Tue, 2021-06-01 at 19:16 +0100, Dave F via Talk-transit wrote:
>
>
> On 01/06/2021 18:32, Philip Barnes wrote:
> > On Tue, 2021-06-01 at 13:07 -0400, Jarek Piórkowski wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 1, 2021, 12:38 Dave F via Talk-transit <
> > > talk-transit@ope
On 01/06/2021 18:32, Philip Barnes wrote:
On Tue, 2021-06-01 at 13:07 -0400, Jarek Piórkowski wrote:
On Tue, Jun 1, 2021, 12:38 Dave F via Talk-transit <
talk-transit@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
On 01/06/2021 16:11, Christopher Parker wrote:
On 6/1/2021 10:54 AM, Dave F via Talk-transit
On 01/06/2021 18:07, Jarek Piórkowski wrote:
On Tue, Jun 1, 2021, 12:38 Dave F via Talk-transit
<mailto:talk-transit@openstreetmap.org>> wrote:
On 01/06/2021 16:11, Christopher Parker wrote:
>
> On 6/1/2021 10:54 AM, Dave F via Talk-transit wrote:
On Tue, 2021-06-01 at 13:07 -0400, Jarek Piórkowski wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 1, 2021, 12:38 Dave F via Talk-transit <
> talk-transit@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> > On 01/06/2021 16:11, Christopher Parker wrote:
> > >
> > > On 6/1/2021 10:54 AM, Dave F via Talk
ut route relations, OSM shows where you can get on the
train/vehicle, but not where you can go
On Tue, Jun 1, 2021, 10:58 Dave F via Talk-transit
<mailto:talk-transit@openstreetmap.org>> wrote:
What's wrong with consulting a timetable?
Maps show you where you can go, timetab
.
Cheerio John
On Tue, Jun 1, 2021, 11:29 Dave F via Talk-transit <
talk-transit@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> What's wrong with consulting a timetable?
>
> Maps show you where you can go, timetables tell you when .
>
> DaveF
>
> On 01/06/2021 01:18, Michael Tsang wrote:
&g
On 6/1/2021 10:54 AM, Dave F via Talk-transit wrote:
What's wrong with consulting a timetable?
To consult a timetable you need to know what station to use.
This is currently a problem in open railway map. You can search the map
based on the name of the train station, but not based
Without route relations, OSM shows where you can get on the train/vehicle,
but not where you can go
On Tue, Jun 1, 2021, 10:58 Dave F via Talk-transit <
talk-transit@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> What's wrong with consulting a timetable?
>
> Maps show you where you can go, timetable
e without consulting the timetable.
___
Talk-transit mailing list
Talk-transit@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
___
Talk-transit mailing list
Talk-transit@openstreetmap.
self &
all its various entrances. A right pig's ear. I gave up.
DaveF
On 31/05/2021 23:14, 10992 via Talk-GB wrote:
And I would have thought that the best way forward is surely to ensure that bus
stops / train stations etc are properly mapped and tagged
(NaPTAN/ATCO/3-alpha/TIPLOC
p, because each departure serves different stops, which mean
they are different variants.
Michael
___
Talk-GB mailing list
talk...@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
___
Talk-t
alls, or may call at if it is a request stop.
As other have said, this is not something that belongs in OSM.
If you need to work out how to get somewhere then the train companies
apps and websites work very well. If you want to include buses as well
the traveline is excellent.
stations each
service calls, or may call at if it is a request stop.
As other have said, this is not something that belongs in OSM.
If you need to work out how to get somewhere then the train companies
apps and websites work very well. If you want to include buses as well
the traveline is excell
ght be
a great idea -- and help reduce inadvertant problems. -- and stop them
coming back.
(I think "block" should be ok though -- probably just there to stop cars)
Cheers,
Neil
P.S. I only raised it on talk-gb as it covered a large area -- I have no
problem reverting smaller changesets in
B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
I apologize if this is a duplicate, but I received notices from Google
Mail that the message below sent to both osmf-talk and talk was not
delivered "because the address couldn't be found, or is unable to
receive mail." I am therefore retransmitting the message using my home
email add
penStreetMap Foundation.
>
> An outcome of the current controversy on the osmf-talk mailing list over
> misogynistic language is a decision by the Board as follows:
>
> The Board will find partners to help instate a moderator team for the
> OSMF-talk and talk mailing lists.
age discouraged from being interested in
maps/geography/volunteering/etc then it is going to result
in lower participation of women in projects for people interested in maps."
would be better phrasing, I noticed too late that "help" has positive
connotations.
_
Dec 10, 2020, 20:58 by talk@openstreetmap.org:
> Underrepresentation of women and gender minorities, racial
> underrepresentation, geographic underrepresentation, these are all
> symptoms. If OSM did not systematically exclude these groups, these
> groups would not be unde
cept to try to improve things and improve our relationship
> skills in a community project. Improving is only a positive notion. So why do
> we read so much resistance? I hope this will serve to lead people to
> self-questioning.
> This can lead us to a wider debate: should violence be
the Call for action is welcome :)
Best wishes,
Blake
> Richard
> ___
> talk mailing list
> talk@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
--
Blake Girardot
gs.
It might therefore be incumbent on us all to shut up and let women be heard.
Their experiences do not need to be mediated through our mansplaining.
In that spirit I'll post no more on this.
Richard
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://
On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 5:22 AM Thomas Barris via osmf-talk
wrote:
> Why do you think such an OSM project as you want it is desirable for the
> majority of the community? I have signed up to this project to collect and
> share free geodata. I am not in favour of using OSM(F) for dis
d, Dec 9, 2020 at 2:13 PM Celine Jacquin wrote:
>
>> Hello everybody
>> I hope you are all well
>>
>> We, several groups, chapters, organizations and individuals, have reacted
>> to the conversation in the osm-talk-list (
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pi
to never talk about gender again. So why do we bring it
up? We bring it up because we see it, we feel it and we experience it. What
I ask for you all is to spend a day talking with women in your lives. We
just want to 'be' too, but the reason we speak up is because being called
derisive terms makes
I apologise for making an assumption about the gender of the person
> using it.
>
I typed out my message and sent it before my mail client refreshed and
showed Kathleen's reply. She's clearly a woman. Quit being obtuse.
-Clay (they/them)
>
_______
t
> conduct yesterday.
>
> -Clay (they/them)
>
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 2:13 PM Celine Jacquin wrote:
>
>> Hello everybody
>> I hope you are all well
>>
>> We, several groups, chapters, organizations and individuals, have reacted
>> to the conversation
his as evidence that there is not
> pervasive misogyny in the OSM community?
>
_______
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
> Many females do not map using their own name but will use a male sounding
> name to avoid problems.
John, are you seriously citing this as evidence that there is not
pervasive misogyny in the OSM community?
___
talk mailing lis
I honestly hope that the OSMF rejects the draft as it is right now,
because the current draft provides several breaches to allow companies
like Mapbox and Facebook to undermine the importance of the
OpenStreetMap project.
___
talk mailing list
talk@opens
ger
size than our textual example).
Cheers
Martin
_______
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
ither attribute in a way that is
compatible with the license, or cease publicly performing works based on
our data. Has there been any reply? What is a reasonable response time for
large scale copyright infringement?
These are screenshots I just took right now, illustrating the issue:
https://i.ibb
data set into bite
sized chunks?
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
<mailto:Talk-au@openstreetmap.org>
https://lists.open
; Hi
>>>>>
>>>>> I am in the eastern suburbs of Perth where minimal buildings have been
>>>>> traced. I would be happy to check trace data in my area, lets face it
>>>>> hand tracing is
ak this
data set into bite
sized chunks?
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
<mailto:Talk-au@openstreetmap.org>
https://lists.openstree
1 - 100 di 2942 matches
Mail list logo
