Hello all,
> but it is essential to use the SmimeCapabilities attribute because
> otherwise Outlook will use only 40-bit encryption and this cannot be
> changed within Outlook. This way it is impossible to distribute s/mime
> certificates to Outlook recipients. I have seen that you
Hello Maxim,
but it is essential to use the SmimeCapabilities attribute because otherwise
Outlook will use only 40-bit encryption and this cannot be changed within
Outlook. This way it is impossible to distribute s/mime certificates to Outlook
recipients. I have seen that you changed the bug
Hello atomheart,
SmimeCapabilities is an attribute (optional) in S/MIME signed messages. The
Bat! doesn't include it. The Bat! doesn't delete or damages S/MIME
certificates. Please attach a few S/MIME signed messages made by Outlook in
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=60,
Hello Martin,
Wednesday, September 5, 2012, 11:38:00 PM, you wrote:
MS> Error reading xtSigners.Options: Invalid property value.
Thank you, we will fix it in the next beta.
--
Best regards,
Maxim Masiutin
Managing director
Ritlabs S.R.L.
___
Hi TBBETA
Got a s/mime signed message and I wanted to see the s/mime information
so I clicked on the icon on the right side.
Got an error window
---
The Bat!
---
Error reading xtSigners.Options: Invalid property value
Hello atomheart,
Monday, September 3, 2012, 3:02:10 PM, you wrote:
> There is a big security bug in TB related to handling of s/mime certificates.
> TB
> deletes or damages S/MIME capabilities data of the certificate, especially
> data of
> the recipient's S/MIME capabilit
There is a big security bug in TB related to handling of s/mime certificates.
TB deletes or damages S/MIME capabilities data of the certificate, especially
data of the recipient's S/MIME capabilities. Consequence: if you import a
certificate sent by TB with MS Outlook, Outlook (and
Hello all,
Wednesday, April 27, 2011, Maxim Masiutin wrote:
>> when saving S/MIME & TLS dialog, error "Invalid pointer operation" appears
>> first and then AVs.
> Thank you, I was able to reproduce it.
it happens on exit and when changing language too.
--
Bye
Hello Marek,
Wednesday, April 27, 2011, 9:35:59 AM, you wrote:
> when saving S/MIME & TLS dialog, error "Invalid pointer operation" appears
> first and then AVs.
Thank you, I was able to reproduce it.
--
Best regards,
Maximmai
Hello,
when saving S/MIME & TLS dialog, error "Invalid pointer operation" appears
first and then AVs.
---
The Bat!
---
Invalid pointer operation.
---
OK
---
reported in https://www.
I had been sending mail successfully and all of a sudden I got this message
from any account from which I tried to send mail
Restarting the Bat fixed the problem
---
Edit Mail Message -> Mike
---
No signing S/MIME certificate
Hello mse!
>> It's just a guess, but your S/MIME certificate says that it's 2048 bits.
>> I've had some bad experiences when I got my first 2048 bits certificate
>> and quickly stepped back to 1024 because too many clients can't handle
>> them and O
Hello Maurice,
> It's just a guess, but your S/MIME certificate says that it's 2048 bits.
> I've had some bad experiences when I got my first 2048 bits certificate
> and quickly stepped back to 1024 because too many clients can't handle
> them and Outlook Expre
Hi Maurice!
>> The fun starts when you try to verify the signatures with another mailer
>> than TheBat, e.g. Squirrelmail, Thunderbird or something else.
> It's just a guess, but your S/MIME certificate says that it's 2048 bits.
> I've had some bad experien
On Thursday, January 7, 2010 at 16:20 Martin Sebald [MS] wrote:
MS> The fun starts when you try to verify the signatures with another mailer
MS> than TheBat, e.g. Squirrelmail, Thunderbird or something else.
It's just a guess, but your S/MIME certificate says that it's 2048 bit
ed up the signature thing.
--
Regards,
Martin
The Bat! v4.2.18 Christmas Edition powered by Windows Server 2008 6.0 Build
6001 Service Pack 1
ConCarne cooks best since 1998
http://www.concarne.org
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
___
Hello Martin,
>> when sending a mail to a friend who is using TheBat, too - he sees the
>> attached error message.
> The friend I was talking about upgraded from 4.1.11 to 4.2.16 Final right
> now. Before, signed mails from him were fine in Squirrelmail and everywhere
> else, now signed mails fro
Hello Marek!
>> problem still exists in 4.2.18...
>> ...and obviously nobody cares...
>> ...as always, adding new fancy features is more important than fixing
>> stuff which already worked before...
> christmas editions have more than 80 bugfixes, what new fancy features
> are You talking about?
Hello all,
Wednesday, January 6, 2010, Martin Sebald wrote:
> Hello all,
> problem still exists in 4.2.18...
> ...and obviously nobody cares...
> ...as always, adding new fancy features is more important than fixing stuff
> which already worked before...
christmas editions have more than 80 bu
Hello all,
problem still exists in 4.2.18...
...and obviously nobody cares...
...as always, adding new fancy features is more important than fixing stuff
which already worked before...
--
Regards,
Martin
The Bat! v4.2.18 Christmas Edition powered by Windows Server 2008 6.0 Build
6001 Servic
ported here:
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=7848
--
Regards,
Martin
The Bat! v4.2.16.2 Christmas Edition powered by Windows Server 2008 6.0 Build
6001 Service Pack 1
ConCarne cooks best since 1998
http://www.concarne.org
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographi
1998
http://www.concarne.org<>
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Current beta is 4.2.16.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
ConCarne cooks best since 1998
http://www.concarne.org
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Current beta is 4.2.16.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
On Wednesday, December 30, 2009 at 03:45 Martin Sebald wrote:
> This message should be signed, too.
> Does someone else has the same problem or can say more about this?
It is signed, but my TB! as well as all those other clients don't have
the root and intermediate certificates that were used to
Hi all,
I noticed that in Squirrelmail S/MIME signed mails from me appear not as
they should. See attached picture.
Also signed mails appear not valid in other mail clients like this one:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20091228
Lightning/1.0b1pre Shredder/3.0.1pre
Hello,
new action "Export S/MIME Signature or Certificate" is missing in main
menu of Sorting Office, it is available in action context menu only.
reported in https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=7834
--
Thanks and Bye,
Marek Mikus
Czech support of The Bat!
http://www.thebat.cz
G'Day Maxim,
Saturday, 15 August 2009, 00:44:25, you wrote:
>>>I just saw that Marcus responded on the BT site,
> I have tried to reproduce this bug, but couldn't, please see my comment
> at https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=7573
Just tired again and how I did and still can not choose the n
Hello Peter,
Friday, August 14, 2009, 18:43:55, you wrote:
>>I just saw that Marcus responded on the BT site,
I have tried to reproduce this bug, but couldn't, please see my comment at
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=7573
--
Best regards,
Maxim Masiutin
Ritlabs SRL
Hi Maxim,
on Fri, 14 Aug 2009 18:08:52 +0300GMT (14.08.2009, 17:08 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:
MM> Thursday, August 06, 2009, 23:22:29, you wrote:
>>>Very nice. But I still cannot use my actual Thawte S/MIME cert.
>>>See https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=7573
M
Hi Maxim,
on Fri, 14 Aug 2009 18:08:52 +0300GMT (14.08.2009, 17:08 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:
MM> Thursday, August 06, 2009, 23:22:29, you wrote:
>>>Very nice. But I still cannot use my actual Thawte S/MIME cert.
>>>See https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=7573
M
Hello Peter,
Thursday, August 06, 2009, 23:22:29, you wrote:
>>Very nice. But I still cannot use my actual Thawte S/MIME cert.
>>See https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=7573
Marcus Jaeger have attached the PFX to this bugtracking entry, but I cannot
import it with the provi
Hi Maxim,
on Thu, 6 Aug 2009 21:20:56 +0300GMT (06.08.2009, 20:20 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:
MM> What's new in 4.2.9.5 since 4.2.9.4:
MM> [*] When working with S/MIME internal implementation, the "Select
MM> Certificate" dialogue box is now sizeable.
MM> ...
Very n
Hello Peter,
Tuesday, May 5, 2009, 7":"29":"01 AM/PM, you wrote:
PM> It is still valid for the current beta on *WinXP, SP3*.
I have more problems with XP (outside TB!) since SP3 was installed.
I'm beginning to think this was intended with 7 coming up...
--
Best Wishes,
Mark
Hi Peter,
on Mon, 27 Apr 2009 19:14:26 +0200GMT I wrote:
PM> last week I imported new S/MIME keys from Thawte because my old ones
PM> had expired. I can see them well in the vCardFile account.vcf, but
PM> when I select to use S/MIME with a new message, the new key does not
PM> a
>
> Thanks for the workaround. I'm more interested in a professional
> solution (i.e. bug fixing), as this is a serious issue.
>
I fully agree with you. Since I can not use the second cert and that is
not nice.
regards
Marcus
Current
Hello Marcus,
On Tue, 05 May 2009 08:01:23 +0200 GMT (05/May/09, 13:01 +0700 GMT),
Marcus Jaeger wrote:
>> ACK. If S/MIME doesn't work properly, this will be a show-stopper. I
>> will have no choice by to change to another email client. My customer
>> will not accept a
>
> On Fri, 1 May 2009 21:29:21 +0200 GMT (02/May/09, 2:29 +0700 GMT),
> Peter Meyns wrote:
>
> PM> I still cannot use my new S/MIME certs. (See:
> PM> https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=7573)
>
> Ignore my message mid:1523590416.20090505123...@thomas-bkk.my-
Hello Peter,
On Fri, 1 May 2009 21:29:21 +0200 GMT (02/May/09, 2:29 +0700 GMT),
Peter Meyns wrote:
PM> I still cannot use my new S/MIME certs. (See:
PM> https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=7573)
Ignore my message mid:1523590416.20090505123...@thomas-bkk.my-fqdn.de
of a few moments ago.
Hello Peter,
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 18:41:11 +0200 GMT (29/Apr/09, 23:41 +0700 GMT),
Peter Meyns wrote in mid:1556876605.20090429184...@nosuchdomain.com:
PM> How about proper S/MIME support?
Please let me know what is wrong with TB!'s S/MIME support. I will
need to use it in the near f
Hi Maxim,
on Fri, 1 May 2009 20:55:56 +0300GMT (01.05.2009, 19:55 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:
MM> The Bat! 4.1.11.19 is available at
MM> http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/tb49.rar
I still cannot use my new S/MIME certs. (See:
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?i
Hi Marcus,
on Wed, 29 Apr 2009 19:28:53 +0200GMT (29.04.2009, 19:28 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:
PM>>> last week I imported new S/MIME keys from Thawte because my old ones
PM>>> had expired. I can see them well in the vCardFile account.vcf, but
PM>>> when I select to us
> on Mon, 27 Apr 2009 19:14:26 +0200GMT I wrote:
PM>> last week I imported new S/MIME keys from Thawte because my old ones
PM>> had expired. I can see them well in the vCardFile account.vcf, but
PM>> when I select to use S/MIME with a new message, the new key does not
PM>
Hi,
on Mon, 27 Apr 2009 19:14:26 +0200GMT I wrote:
PM> last week I imported new S/MIME keys from Thawte because my old ones
PM> had expired. I can see them well in the vCardFile account.vcf, but
PM> when I select to use S/MIME with a new message, the new key does not
PM> appear in
Hi all,
last week I imported new S/MIME keys from Thawte because my old ones
had expired. I can see them well in the vCardFile account.vcf, but
when I select to use S/MIME with a new message, the new key does not
appear in the list of available keys. So S/MIME is unusable for me
right now
alarm with Antivir Premium.
>> I would prefer the signing of the beta rar files with S/MIME or PGP to
>> have the ability to check integrity of the file.
>> May be a SHA1/MD5 checksum file would be usable.
>> Adding a signature or checksum is not much work.
>> I t
beta rar files with S/MIME or PGP to
> have the ability to check integrity of the file.
> May be a SHA1/MD5 checksum file would be usable.
> Adding a signature or checksum is not much work.
> I think most of the betatesters want to know if the downloaded
> file is not modified.
Hello,
The scanning of the rar file with a antivirus scanner gives mostly
false alerts. These alerts disturbs and/or irritates users.
I would prefer the signing of the beta rar files with S/MIME or PGP to
have the ability to check integrity of the file.
May be a SHA1/MD5 checksum file would be
Hello ,
--
Best regards,
Miles Chang mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Translator of Chinese The Bat!
Using The Bat! v4.0.34.7 with AntispamSniper v2.7.1.7 & MyMacros 1.11a
on Windows XP (v5.1.2600, Service Pack 3)
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signa
Hello Martin,
Tuesday, June 24, 2008, 3:28:23 PM, you wrote:
> I have a big problem with this version and S/MIME-Certificates. When I
> receive an encrypted message and want to decrypt it I receive an error
Thank you, we will fix it in the next beta.
--
Best regards,
Hello Maxim,
Thursday, June 19, 2008, 8:12:48 PM, you wrote:
> The Bat! 4.0.24.23 is available at
> http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/tb402423.rar
I have a big problem with this version and S/MIME-Certificates. When I
receive an encrypted message and want to decryp
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008, at 18:26:18 [GMT +0600] (which was 13:26 where I
live) Ivan Bolhovitinov wrote:
>> I have done that in the past encrypt with PGP and sign with S/MIME
> But you needed it or it was only for joy and\or testing ?
Hi Ivan,
Because I needed it (part of a protocol). I
Hi Henk,
on Mon, 18 Feb 2008 12:45:58 +0100GMT (18.02.2008, 12:45 +0100GMT here),
you wrote:
HMdB> Why does the Bat! not remember my password for
signing/encrypting/decrypting?
Confirmed. I looked, and there even *is* an option to cache
passphrases. I absolutely forgot about it, because TB! *a
Hi, Henk.
> I have done that in the past encrypt with PGP and sign with S/MIME
But you needed it or it was only for joy and\or testing ?
> Why does the Bat! not remember my password for signing/encrypting/decrypting?
It is cached for XX minutes...
Or you mean constantly ?
--
VBR,
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008, at 15:49:52 [GMT +0600] (which was 10:49 where I
live) Ivan Bolhovitinov wrote:
>
Hello, TBBETA.
here are some issues around PGP-S/MIME
Unable to decrypt inline OpenPGP when HTML+text mode is used
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6818
Gmail has
Hello, TBBETA.
here are some issues around PGP-S/MIME
Unable to decrypt inline OpenPGP when HTML+text mode is used
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6818
Can OpenPGP and S/MIME works together?
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6817
Printing encrypted message is impossible (S\MIME
Hello Damien,
Thursday, February 7, 2008, 2:02:38 AM, you wrote:
> With last beta version (4.0.0.21), I have an access violation of the
> bat! if I try to send an email with attachment and S/MIME enable for
> signature:
We will fix this with the next update.
--
Best regard
In reply to :
D> With last beta version (4.0.0.21), I have an access violation of the
D> bat! if I try to send an email with attachment and S/MIME enable for
D> signature:
D> "Access violation at address 00B591D5 in module 'thebat.exe'. Read of
D> address 008
Hello,
With last beta version (4.0.0.21), I have an access violation of the
bat! if I try to send an email with attachment and S/MIME enable for
signature:
"Access violation at address 00B591D5 in module 'thebat.exe'. Read of
address 008C'
This is an IMAP account. No pr
Hi,
Just got this sending an smime signed message with an attachment.
---
Edit Mail Message ->
---
Access violation at address 00B7DFD5 in module 'thebat.exe'. Read of address
008C
---
OK
---
On Sun, 6 Aug 2006, at 13:58:47 [GMT -0400] (which was 19:58 where I
live) Mike wrote:
> I'm not sure if this has been brought up before, but it seems
> that S/MIME is broken in v3.81.14 and I know v3.81.13 as well. If I
> go to encrypt a message, TB! will bring up t
I'm not sure if this has been brought up before, but it seems
that S/MIME is broken in v3.81.14 and I know v3.81.13 as well. If I
go to encrypt a message, TB! will bring up the proper cert, but, the
OK button is disabled.
--
Mike
Using The Bat! v3.81.14 Beta on Windows XP 5.1
s for that too!
I noticed that your two recent messages have been signed s/mime and
verify ok with this version!
--
Henk M. de Bruijn
__
The Bat! Natural E-Mail System version 3.63.12 (Beta) Pro on Windows XP SP2
PGPkey at: http://w
Hi all readers,
on Fri, 29 Jul 2005 19:49:42 +0200GMT I wrote:
PM> For https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4986 import my cert, change
PM> to another window, change back to my message, click import on the cert
PM> again.
Strange. Trying it with my own cert now doesn't pose a problem. But I
h
n2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Current beta is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMP
a
certificate to the address book and did not remember that I already
imported it weeks ago.
Regards,
Martin
--
The Bat! v3.51.9 powered by Windows 2003 5.2 Build 3790 Service Pack 1
ConCarne cooks best since 1998
http://www.concarne.org
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Crypto
Hi Maxim!
>> Can somebody confirm?
> Can't confirm without samples.
Ok no problem.
>> After deleting all S/MIME certificates out of a address book entry the
>> checkbox "Cert" is still active
>> https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4985
What kind o
Hello all,
Monday, July 25, 2005, Martin Sebald wrote:
> https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4986
unable to reproduce, TB displays info about existing certificate, no
crash.
--
Bye
Marek Mikus
Czech support of The Bat!
http://www.thebat.cz
Using the best The Bat! 3.51.9
under Windows XP 5
Hello Martin,
Monday, July 25, 2005, 11:33:37, you wrote:
>>https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4985
>>https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4986
>>https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4987
>>Can somebody confirm?
Can't confirm without samples.
--
Best regards,
Maxim Masiutin
Hello All,
some S/MIME bugs:
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4985
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4986
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4987
Can somebody confirm?
Regards,
Martin
--
The Bat! v3.51.9 powered by Windows 2003 5.2 Build 3790 Service Pack 1
ConCarne cooks
Hello Frank,
on Thu, 31 Mar 2005 23:46:04 +0200 GMT your local time you wrote:
FL> In 3.0.9.11 my Certificate for S/MIME is suddenly invalid. After going
FL> back tu 3.0.9.10 it work´s fine !!
Maybe it is an issue related to ?
--
Regards,
Peter
Using Ritlabs TheBat! 3.0.9.10 Retu
Hello tbbeta,
In 3.0.9.11 my Certificate for S/MIME is suddenly invalid. After going
back tu 3.0.9.10 it work´s fine !!
any confirmations ?
--
Adios,
Frank
Current beta is 3.0.9.10 Return | 'Using TBBETA' informa
Hello Dimitry,
Tuesday, October 26, 2004, 14:36:50, you wrote:
DA> On 2004-10-26 at 21:28:44 Dimitry Andric wrote:
>>> Now, I had never used the TB! S/MIME certificate generator (usually I
>>> run openssl to do something like this).
>> Where is this nice generator
On 2004-10-26 at 21:28:44 Dimitry Andric wrote:
>> Now, I had never used the TB! S/MIME certificate generator (usually I
>> run openssl to do something like this).
> Where is this nice generator hidden? At least, I can't seem to find
> the magical sequence of commands
On 2004-10-26 at 04:41:21 hggdh wrote:
> Now, I had never used the TB! S/MIME certificate generator (usually I
> run openssl to do something like this).
Where is this nice generator hidden? At least, I can't seem to find
the magical sequence of commands to enable the "Generat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Marck,
Monday, October 25, 2004, 21:52:59, you wrote:
MDP> That's exactly what the "Reset signers..." button in the account
MDP> properties .. Edit personal certificates dialog is for.
oh boy, oh boy, oh boy :-)
--
..hggdh..
Using The
Dear Hggdh,
@25-Oct-2004, 21:41 -0500 (26-Oct 03:41 UK time) hggdh [H] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to tbbeta:
...
H> ... you cannot select WHICH S/MIME you want to use. TB! will *ONLY*
H> use the first you added in!
That's exactly what the "Reset signers..." button in t
Hello folks,
I have been trying to show another user how to generate self-signed
certificates on TB!.
Now, I had never used the TB! S/MIME certificate generator (usually I
run openssl to do something like this). so obviously I hit some
roadblocks, which were bypassed. All in all, quite easy
Hi Alexander!
>> I don't understand. I was talking about one single person in the address
>> book, let's call the person Alexander Leschinsky. This person/entry has a
>> S/MIME certificate under "Certificates". The check mark for "Cert" in the
&
Hello Martin,
On Wed, 8 Sep 2004 12:53:27 +0200 (08.09.2004 16:53 my local time),
received Wednesday, September 8, 2004 at 18:09:42 +0600,
you wrote about "S/MIME: The issuer of this certificate chain was not found",
at least in part:
MS> You don'tr have the prob
Hello Martin,
On Tue, 7 Sep 2004 12:01:39 +0200 (07.09.2004 16:01 my local time),
received Wednesday, September 8, 2004 at 0:34:17 +0600,
you wrote about "S/MIME: The issuer of this certificate chain was not found",
at least in part:
MS> So the question mark is not the
Hi all,
interesting, that no one from Ritlabs is interested in that. At least they
are promoting the "new" version of TB with full S/MIME support...
Regards,
Martin
--
The Bat! v3.0.0.7 powered by Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
ConCarne cooks best since 1998
http://www.co
tly that is the point. The certificate shows as valid
MS> everywhere but when I check it when sending the mail it is shown as
MS> invalid. Also the strange question marks instead of the "valid" symbols in
MS> the account properties.
I see an invalid S/MIME certificate.
,-
|
Hello Martin,
On Sun, 5 Sep 2004 23:35:00 +0200 (06.09.2004 3:35 my local time),
received Monday, September 6, 2004 at 4:20:41 +0600,
you wrote about "S/MIME: The issuer of this certificate chain was not found",
at least in part:
MS> Additional information: When I
* Maxim Masiutin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You have turned on "Compress data before encryption" which is off by
> default. It conforms to rfc3274, but is not yet supported by a
> majority of S/MIME clients.
> Should we give an additional "warning" m
Hello Kevin,
Thursday, July 15, 2004, 19:50:13, you wrote:
>>I don't use s/mime that often but attempted to exchange encrypted
>>mails with some Thunderbird and Mozilla recipients. I am able to
>>decrypt their messages. They can verify my signed mail. However, none
>&g
Hello Kevin,
Thursday, July 15, 2004, 7:50:13 PM, you wrote:
>>I don't use s/mime that often but attempted to exchange encrypted
>>mails with some Thunderbird and Mozilla recipients. I am able to
>>decrypt their messages. They can verify my signed mail. However, non
Hi Cedric Fontaine
-
On Sun, 4 Jul 2004, at 08:11:17 [GMT -0400] (which was 5:11 AM where I
live) you wrote:
> Bonjour !
> Le samedi 3 juillet 2004 à 22:43:16, vous écriviez :
KA>> Hi Cedric Fontaine
KA>> It looks like plenty of people have confirmed
Hello TBBeta!
I don't use S/MIME that often, but last time I checked (using a prior
release) certificates for all of my accounts were working. With this
version all of my certificates show as invalid. Can someone please
confirm?
--
Kevin Coates
Dewitt, NY USA
Using TB! v2.05 Beta/12
Hi Zygmunt,
on Fri, 6 Feb 2004 11:41:07 +0100GMT, you wrote:
ZW> Can anybody confirm inability to use S/MIME certificates in Beta/54? It
ZW> is observed in mass mailing and in normal message sending. I have valid
ZW> certificate, but the "Select Certificate" dialog does not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
ZW> Can anybody confirm inability to use S/MIME certificates in Beta/54? It
Beta 54? Do you know something we don't?
- --
Stuart
Using The Bat! v2.03 Beta/53 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1
Aided by BayesIt! 0.4gm
PGP Key availa
On Friday, February 6, 2004, at 11:41:07 [UTC+0100] (Friday, February 6,
2004 11:41 my local time) I wrote:
> Can anybody confirm inability to use S/MIME certificates in Beta/54?
Of course, I think about Beta/53 as stated in Subject line, sorry!
--
Best regards,
Zygmunt Wereszczynski
(Us
Hello all!
Can anybody confirm inability to use S/MIME certificates in Beta/54? It
is observed in mass mailing and in normal message sending. I have valid
certificate, but the "Select Certificate" dialog does not allow to
select the one and use it to sign message.
In mass mailing this
Hello Marck,
On Sun, 4 Jan 2004 22:23:14 + (05.01.2004 03:23 my local time)
you wrote about "PGP-Mime next one after S-Mime",
at least in part:
MDP> Now that TB has PGP/MIME defaulting to "Auto" and no way of setting
MDP> it to a default of "off&qu
Hello Kevin,
On Fri, 26 Dec 2003 01:19:40 -0500 (26.12.2003 11:19 my local time)
you wrote about "S/MIME",
at least in part:
KC> Then the Internal Implementation stores them in the address book
KC> and CryptoAPI stores them under InternetProperties|Content|
KC> Cert
Hello Kevin,
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003 01:29:20 -0500 (23.12.2003 11:29 my local time)
you wrote about "S/MIME",
at least in part:
KC> Is this with some special plug-ins?
Yes... Only this way
--
Best regards,
Alexander Leschinsky
Powered by • The Bat! 2.03.19 • POP3 Catcher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello TBBeta!
When replying to an s/mime signed/encrypted message, the "Enable
OpenPGP" selection is automatically toggled rather than the desired
"Enable S/MIME". The reply should try and use the same format as the
received
Hello Peter,
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003 20:00:44 +0100 (05.11.2003 00:00 my local time)
you wrote about "s/mime problem",
at least in part:
PM> I can confirm something similar: I tried to S/MIME sign this message,
PM> got the password dialog, entered the password, but nothin
Hello Kevin,
On 29 October 2003, 12:42 -0500 ( 17:42 local time) Kevin Coates [KC] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MW>> I can no longer send using S/MIME. The password for my private key
MW>> is no longer accepted. Can anyone confirm?
KC> I don't use S/MIME much but when I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Kevin,
KC> I don't use S/MIME much but when I installed my Thawte certificate
KC> they tested fine using The Bat's Internal Implementation. With this
KC> beta version my experience is the same as yours. Password not
K
Hi Martin,
On Oct 28, 2003, 19:47 + ( 2:47 PM here), Martin Webster [MW]
wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
MW> I can no longer send using S/MIME. The password for my private key
MW> is no longer accepted. Can anyone confirm?
I don't use S/MIME much but when I installed my T
1 - 100 of 220 matches
Mail list logo
