Hi Januk,
On Mon, 17 Jan 2000 23:31:01 -0800GMT (18/01/2000, 15:31 +0800GMT),
Januk Aggarwal wrote:
JA %From=""%From="%FROMNAME %FromAddr (By way of %OTOADDR)"
I have modified the QT as above, which works quite fantastically. :-)
However, it works as long as one of my addresses is the original
Hello Thomas,
Tuesday, January 18, 2000, 12:23:20 AM, you wrote:
Hi Januk,
On Mon, 17 Jan 2000 23:31:01 -0800GMT (18/01/2000, 15:31 +0800GMT),
Januk Aggarwal wrote:
JA %From=""%From="%FROMNAME %FromAddr (By way of %OTOADDR)"
I have modified the QT as above, which works quite
Hello Thomas,
Tuesday, January 18, 2000, 12:23:20 AM, you wrote:
Hi Januk,
On Mon, 17 Jan 2000 23:31:01 -0800GMT (18/01/2000, 15:31 +0800GMT),
Januk Aggarwal wrote:
JA %From=""%From="%FROMNAME %FromAddr (By way of %OTOADDR)"
Ok, I've finally got one that does what I like best. See my
On Mon, 17 Jan 2000 22:18:28 -0800, Januk Aggarwal wrote:
Steve Lamb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We've gone over this, Allie. At first glance that is going to the right
place because of TB!'s broken behavior, configurable or not.
Ok, but why would you *intentionally* put the wrong reply-to
Hello, the Bat! list recipients,
Monday, January 17, 2000, Steve Lamb wrote to Allie Martin about
External editor (was:Re: suggestion- / wish-list):
SL When you look at the base level and how to handle the data as
SL ASCII editing with all the functions that are similar, you see
SL
On Tue, 18 Jan 2000 11:06:20 +0400, Oleg Zalyalov wrote:
[..snip..]
That is not a problem with external editor which allow scripting. The
problems begin only when you use macros which use information
unavailable to external editor, just because it's external. One of
examples
Hello, the Bat! list recipients,
Tuesday, January 18, 2000, Thomas Fernandez wrote to Oleg Zalyalov about
suggestion- / wish-list:
OZ That is not a problem with external editor which allow scripting. The
OZ problems begin only when you use macros which use information
OZ unavailable
Hi Januk,
On Tue, 18 Jan 2000 00:49:26 -0800GMT (18/01/2000, 16:49 +0800GMT),
Januk Aggarwal wrote:
JA %From=""%From="%FROMNAME %FromAddr (By way of %FOLDERFROMNAME %FOLDERFROMADDR)"
Excellent!! This it is!! :-)
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Message reply created with The Bat! 1.39
under
Hi Tom,
On 18 January 2000 at 17:50:56 GMT -0800 (which was 01:50 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points:
AVK Please, don't do this! Maybe as an option only;-) It's thel
AVK thing I like *most* in TB's editor, morethenthat, I use *only*
AVK the editors that support
Hello, the Bat! list recipients,
Monday, January 17, 2000, Thomas Fernandez wrote to Oleg Zalyalov about
Error Messages:
TF No; this happens to me often. The error message than is: "Server
TF reports error: previous process active. Press cancel before retrying."
TF or something like that. I
Hi Januk,
On 18 January 2000 at 23:43:39 GMT -0800 (which was 07:43 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points:
JA Monday, January 17, 2000, 11:31:01 PM, you wrote:
From originalwith whatever
JA Ok, this is weird, when I was composing the above
Hello, the Bat! list recipients,
Tuesday, January 18, 2000, Allie Martin wrote to Oleg Zalyalov about
suggestion- / wish-list:
AM So what's your axe against TB! supporting an external editor?
No, it is against removing current internal editor.
It is just my personal opinion said by the way
Hi Oleg,
On Tue, 18 Jan 2000 13:18:02 +0400GMT (18/01/2000, 17:18 +0800GMT),
Oleg Zalyalov wrote:
OZ First, you have to check how did the previous session finished and why.
Thanks for your explanation. The previous session usually finished by
my DUN connection going click-dood-dood- That's
Hello, the Bat! list recipients,
Tuesday, January 18, 2000, Thomas Fernandez wrote to Oleg Zalyalov about
Error Messages:
TF Hi Oleg,
TF On Tue, 18 Jan 2000 13:18:02 +0400GMT (18/01/2000, 17:18 +0800GMT),
TF Oleg Zalyalov wrote:
OZ First, you have to check how did the previous session
Hello Januk Aggarwal,
On Tue, 18 Jan 2000 at 00:49:26 [GMT -0800] your local time which was
Tuesday, January 18, 2000 15:49:26 [GMT +0700] my local time, you told
to the list:
JA %From=""%From="%FROMNAME %FromAddr (By way of %OTOADDR)"
JA Ok, I've finally got one that does what I like
Hi,
regarding that From bug:
this is something that some mail transport agents (probably list
softwares, too) do on purpose. In old Unix mailbox formats a line
beginning with "From " was recognized as a new message delimiter. Thus
it may happen that messages that had "From" somewhere in the
I'm a long time user of Agent, and have to admit that this is the
first program to come along in _years_ that turned my head at all! I
really like the functionality of the Bat. However, mail is probably
only 1/4 of my needs. The other 3/4 is newsgroups. Are there any plans
to add newsgroup
Hello Oleg Zalyalov,
On Tue, 18 Jan 2000 at 15:13:21 [GMT +0400] your local time which was
Tuesday, January 18, 2000 18:13:21 [GMT +0700] my local time, you told
to the list:
[ ... ]
TF However, how do I send this QUIT command to the server.
OZ No way in this case. You have to wait those
Hello Everybody,
when you've got a contact with 2 (or more) email-adresses, everytime
you create a new message using the adress-book, the mail is
auto-bcc'ed to the second address...
how can i disable this?
--
Der Immer Jodelende Schweizer In Lederhosen
Roel
Morning All Y'All!
Because of the lack of a better activity, and testing being a hobby of mine,
I felt like doing a little testrun over The Bat interface. Here's what came
out: Request for Comment/Confirmation before "official" submission ;-) Some
might be known already, but are still
Monday, January 17, 2000, 8:52:12 PM, Jast wrote:
- take hand off kb, grab for mouse (ca .5 sec, not much more than moving it
to PgUp on the keyboard)
Move hand to PgUp
- use scrollbar to move up 9 pages (usually faster than 9x PgUp, gets quicker
Monday, January 17, 2000, 10:18:28 PM, Januk wrote:
Steve Lamb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We've gone over this, Allie. At first glance that is going to the right
place because of TB!'s broken behavior, configurable or not.
Ok, but why would you *intentionally* put the wrong reply-to in your
Monday, January 17, 2000, 9:36:43 PM, Januk wrote:
No problem. :) Just another quick tip, make a quick template that has
%TO=""
%TO="Joe [EMAIL PROTECTED] (By way of Jane "[EMAIL PROTECTED]")
Oh god, *NO!* That has to be the worst suggestion I have ever seen. This
is emulating Eudora's
Monday, January 17, 2000, 11:49:10 PM, Januk wrote:
Of course now I can not reproduce the bug if I try. sigh
From shouldn't be anything special, should it?
Yes, it is. Why the extra ? You're server is using the mailbox format
which uses "^From " as the marker between text (^ is regex for
Tuesday, January 18, 2000, 1:02:28 AM, Oleg wrote:
I don't need excellent editor for editing mail. I am quite happy with
mediocre one. The main thing I want from it -- speed.
That is you. You're not me and, well, the other 6 billion people on this
planet.
--
Steve C. Lamb
In Reference to "testrun: interface bugs and inconsistencies" From Jast:
J Morning All Y'All!
Did you learn that from watching Dallas reruns over there?? I hear
that on a daily basis around these parts.
J Because of the lack of a better activity,
Gee Jast, time on your hands?? Do we need to
Tuesday, January 18, 2000, 1:15:11 AM, Marck wrote:
No - so that you can begin to understand the power of the virtual
space for plain text formatting.
With space cansome things.
virtual you do interesting
Without it - no possibility.
Tuesday, January 18, 2000, 1:41:55 AM, Oleg wrote:
It is just my personal opinion said by the way that adding some kind of a
hook for external editor to TB! will not save time to RITlabs to be more
concentrated on mail-specific functions.
Then you haven't thought it through.
Add
Tuesday, January 18, 2000, 5:10:22 AM, Grant wrote:
I'm a long time user of Agent, and have to admit that this is the
first program to come along in _years_ that turned my head at all! I
really like the functionality of the Bat. However, mail is probably
only 1/4 of my needs. The other 3/4 is
Hallo Steve,
On Tue, 18 Jan 2000 07:17:12 -0800 GMT (18.01.2000, 23:17 +0800 GMT),
Steve Lamb wrote:
%TO="Joe [EMAIL PROTECTED] (By way of Jane "[EMAIL PROTECTED]")
SL Oh god, *NO!* That has to be the worst suggestion I have ever seen. This
SL is emulating Eudora's /very/ broken
Hallo Roel,
On Tue, 18 Jan 2000 15:46:28 +0100 GMT (18.01.2000, 22:46 +0800 GMT),
Roel wrote:
R when you've got a contact with 2 (or more) email-adresses, everytime
R you create a new message using the adress-book, the mail is
R auto-bcc'ed to the second address...
R how can i disable
In Reference to "External editor (was:Re: suggestion- / wish-list)" From Steve Lamb:
I don't need excellent editor for editing mail. I am quite happy with
mediocre one. The main thing I want from it -- speed.
SL That is you. You're not me and, well, the other 6 billion people on this
SL
\\\|///
/ ~ _ \
(- O o -)
--oOOo-(_)-oOOo---
Hello Thomas,
TF Do they have the same name? I use (for example) Roel/Home and
TF Roel/Office and don't have the problem you describe.
no, i mean
Tuesday, January 18, 2000, 7:38:45 AM, Thomas wrote:
Make a constructive suggestion. ;-)
I did. Encouraging broken behavior is not to be done, period. That is
broken behavior. By using it you cause problems. By not using it you don't
cause problems. That is constructive.
--
Hi there!
On 17 Jan 00, at 17:50, Tom Plunket wrote
about "Re[2]: suggestion- / wish-list":
AVK Press downdownhome instead;-)
MDP it's only one additional keystroke after all.
Umm, it's 50% more typing. See, the problem doesn't manifest itself
'til you're actually trying to use
Hi there!
On 18 Jan 00, at 7:32, Steve Lamb wrote
about "Re: suggestion- / wish-list":
It is just my personal opinion said by the way that adding some kind of a
hook for external editor to TB! will not save time to RITlabs to be more
concentrated on mail-specific functions.
Hi Roel,
On 18 January 2000 at 17:04:49 GMT +0100 (which was 16:04 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points:
TF Do they have the same name? I use (for example) Roel/Home and
TF Roel/Office and don't have the problem you describe.
R no, i mean this:
R i've got 1
\\\|///
/ ~ _ \
(- O o -)
--oOOo-(_)-oOOo---
Hello Marck,
MDP Yes, but it's the way it works :-(
too bad: that only creates massive overheads in the adressbook...
also: keeping info up to date
Hi Steve,
On 18 January 2000 at 07:31:12 GMT -0800 (which was 15:31 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points:
TP Seriously, the reason I don't like virtual space have nothing to
TP do with the fact that I'm not used to it.
Now you're not making any sense. With
Hello The Bat! users,
on Jan 10th our domain was finally moved to another ISP, about two days
later the whole mail traffic came in via the new mail server.
Except all the incoming mail of TBUDL - this is still going to our
former ISP and I still have to fetch it from there (fortunately our
-Original Message-
From: Michael Heydekamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2000 19:55:44 +0100
Subject: DNS problem?
on Jan 10th our domain was finally moved to another ISP, about two
days
later the whole mail traffic came in via the new mail server.
Normally,
Tuesday, January 18, 2000, 10:55:44 AM, Michael wrote:
Does any of the experts here have an idea what's going on and what I can
do about that? Shouldn't they also in Indonesia be aware of the new DNS
data?
Depends on the expire time on the zone file. If it is set to a week with,
say, a
J Because of the lack of a better activity, and testing being a hobby of mine,
J I felt like doing a little testrun over The Bat interface.
Heh...
ok, how about this:
message list message view account view
Ctrl+] nothing next unread
-Original Message-
From: "Syafril Hermansyah" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2000 02:26:23 +0700
Subject: Re: DNS problem?
-Original Message-
From: Michael Heydekamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2000 19:55:44 +0100
Subject:
TP Well, you two aren't typical Windows users. As it goes, virtual
TP spacel has some people who like it and others who don't.
MDP Tom - that's not reasonable.
Which of you is a typical Windows sheep then?
MDP We're both *very different users* who happen to agree on this
MDP point.
Tuesday, January 18, 2000, 10:40:09 AM, Marck wrote:
Of course the external editor option looks more attractive all the time.
OF course it does. You'd think with Unix folks building on pushing 30
years of computing experience they'd get a few things right. I still find it
amusing that a
On Tue, 18 Jan 2000 12:00:20 -0800, Tom Plunket wrote:
[..snip..]
So, can I navigate the freaking program without tabbing all over the
universe?
I listen to your troubles with some amusement because I understand.
You forgot the part about spacebar-scrolling through messages and suddenly
Hi TB! Group,
I just installed TB! 2 days ago, and I just cannot believe this
emailer. I have never seen so much functionality, and I have just
scratched the surface of it. So much to play with, and it is so
customizable. Was a previous Outlook 2000 and Eudora 4.2 user. Have
a
\\\|///
/ ~ _ \
(- O o -)
--oOOo-(_)-oOOo---
Hello Tom,
TP Right, atypical of the standard Windows crowd. Tell me, when you set
TP up Windows, does either one of you choose "Typical
Hello Gary,
Tuesday, January 18, 2000, 10:58:15 PM, you wrote:
G Is there anyway to use the same directories and open up the same as
G email as I have on the W98 side?
I do exactly the same but with Win98 and NT 4.0.
No problem so far... ;-))
--
Best regards,
Alex Sanyukovitch
11:18:54 PM
On Tue, 18 Jan 2000 11:49:09 -0800, you wrote:
GB I'm a long time user of Agent, and have to admit that this is the
GB first program to come along in _years_ that turned my head at all! I
GB really like the functionality of the Bat. However, mail is probably
GB only 1/4 of my needs. The other
Tuesday, January 18, 2000, 1:17:45 PM, Roel wrote:
all the 'crap' is removed :-) don't worry about it: it isn't there...
I can think of one that is there. One that they had to put a special case
in just for all of this foofie cursor play. ;)
TP I agree with Steve. If I put four spaces
\\\|///
/ ~ _ \
(- O o -)
--oOOo-(_)-oOOo---
Hello Gary,
G Is there anyway to use the same directories and open up the same as
G email as I have on the W98 side?
you can do this while setting
Hi there,
I got PGP 6.5.3 now, seems to be quite new... just wanted to tell the
other folks interested in PGP that this one seems to be working well
with The Bat! Checking signatures works again at long last, although
not automatic ;) I installed it on Win2k, which works generally, but I
Monday, January 17, 2000, 9:26:45 AM, Thomas wrote:
Semantic difference. What I meant is the client default, of course.
Then say that. My client is TB!, not Thomas Fernandez. ;P
I don't think so. Both are not regulated by the RFC's or whereever,
and it is only common agreemens -
Tuesday, January 18, 2000, 1:16:58 PM, Grant wrote:
No, not really.
Use Outlook, it does both. Agent does both, from what I hear. I'd much
rather prefer to keep this specialized client specialized since it is so
damned hard to find a good specialized client in this madness to include
Hi Roel and Alex,
On Tuesday, January 18, 2000, 3:27:39 PM, you wrote:
R you can do this while setting up your accounts:
R instead of the default-path, choose a fixed one on a shared
R partition...
R that's all...
Thank you both for your help. Makes perfect sense! So much to learn
in TB!
Hi Oliver,
On Tuesday, January 18, 2000, 3:28:20 PM, you wrote:
O Hi there,
O I got PGP 6.5.3 now, seems to be quite new... just wanted to tell the
O other folks interested in PGP that this one seems to be working well
O with The Bat! Checking signatures works again at long last, although
On Tue, 18 Jan 2000 16:16:58 -0500, Grant Baxter wrote:
[..snip..]
No, not really. Anyone (like me) that has interests in things that
span both newsgroups and maillists, would like (as I do) to be able to
file pertinent info from both newsgroups _and_ maillists into the same
folder. For
On Tue, 18 Jan 2000 13:42:04 -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
[..snip..] conceded with content :)
Unlike the "do you REALLY want to delete this" prompts from Windows which
are ineffective. I know they are coming, I slam the enter key already while
flying on autopilot so it confirms nothing.
Hi Gary,
On Dienstag, 18. Januar 2000 at 22:57:22 you wrote:
O I got PGP 6.5.3 now, seems to be quite new... just wanted to tell the
O other folks interested in PGP that this one seems to be working well
O with The Bat! Checking signatures works again at long last, although
O not
SL Incorrect. REPLY-TO is a matter of at least RFC822. RFC822 does dictate
SL what purposes REPLY-TO can be employed for and puts forth acceptable use of
SL that field.
I would bet that it does not require a prompt, though, as you say:
SL Further, convention is that there is at least
Hello group,
I would like to see this little feature. If TB! is minimized on the
taskbar, I would like the ability to right click on the TB! tab, while
in the taskbar and have the option (other than close or restore) to
fetch mail now from all accounts (without opening the TB! window).
This
In Reference to "Wish list" From Gary:
G I would like to see this little feature. If TB! is minimized on the
G taskbar, I would like the ability to right click on the TB! tab, while
G in the taskbar and have the option (other than close or restore) to
G fetch mail now from all accounts
Hi Tom,
On 18 January 2000 at 12:33:36 GMT -0800 (which was 20:33 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points:
TP do you EVER choose "typical installation"?
Absolutely never. What's your point?
TP Plain-text formatting? That's ridiculous.
My example was inane, I accept
Hi Tom,
On 18 January 2000 at 12:37:24 GMT -0800 (which was 20:37 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points:
TP Are they really gone?
Yes.
TP Does anybody know FOR SURE?
Me, for one. You, if you tried it for yourself.
--
Cheers,
.\\arck
Marck D. Pearlstone, Consultant
On Tue, 18 Jan 2000 15:40:33 -0800, Tom Plunket wrote:
...that other programs prompt is not at issue. What if the solution
was to NOT prompt, but to offer an easy way to change to other
addresses (or other fields, what have you)? Like, say, a droplist
when editing your message, and you
Hello Oleg Zalyalov,
On Tue, 18 Jan 2000 15:13:21 +0400 GMT your local time,
which was Tuesday, January 18, 2000, 6:13:21 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Oleg Zalyalov wrote:
TF Thanks for your explanation. The previous session usually finished by
TF my DUN connection going click-dood-dood-
Hello Thomas Fernandez,
On Tue, 18 Jan 2000 23:38:45 +0800 GMT your local time,
which was Tuesday, January 18, 2000, 10:38:45 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Thomas Fernandez wrote:
Thomas Hallo Steve,
Thomas On Tue, 18 Jan 2000 07:17:12 -0800 GMT (18.01.2000, 23:17 +0800 GMT),
Thomas Steve Lamb
Hello Nick Danger,
On Tue, 18 Jan 2000 09:56:41 -0600 GMT your local time,
which was Tuesday, January 18, 2000, 10:56:41 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Nick Danger wrote:
Nick In Reference to "External editor (was:Re: suggestion- / wish-list)" From Steve
Lamb:
I don't need excellent editor for
Hi Steve,
On 18 January 2000 at 12:39:12 GMT -0800 (which was 20:39 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points:
SL *Steve then points out that in some editors that isn't needed
SL since it retains the column that the cursor was last in, even on
SL short lines, even
Tuesday, January 18, 2000, 3:40:33 PM, Tom wrote:
...that other programs prompt is not at issue.
If one is trying to argue based on convention alone, it is. What others
do is what dictates convention.
What if the solution was to NOT prompt, but to offer an easy way to change
to other
Tuesday, January 18, 2000, 4:44:18 PM, Gary wrote:
taskbar, I would like the ability to right click on the TB! tab, while
Options / Minimize to Tray
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
ICQ: 5107343 | main connection to the
On Wed, 19 Jan 2000 01:03:19 +, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
TP Power. You keep implying that useless features are powerful.
Useless to you, perhaps.
Ditto. The free caret interface rocks. The *free* caret is just that.
*Free*. You may do what you want with it in the visible space.
TP do you EVER choose "typical installation"?
MDP Absolutely never. What's your point?
My point was the fact that the people I was talking to took issue with
the fact that I stated these people were atypical Windows users. I
was pointing out that I was, indeed, dead-on.
TP Plain-text
Ok, so I've been shopping for a new email client, and The Bat! seems
to be working relatively well.
Without going into evangelism, can anyone give me any pros/cons of the
"competition" as compared to The Bat!?
I've downloaded Calypso but have yet to install it. Haven't used
Eudora in years.
Hi Allie,
On 19 January 2000 at 20:20:26 GMT -0500 (which was 01:20 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points:
An aside: if The Bat! strips virtual space, do sigdashes go out
improperly formatted? In other words, do we get dashdashspace
or are we stuck with
\\\|///
/ ~ _ \
(- O o -)
--oOOo-(_)-oOOo---
Hello Marck,
MDP Ahem - I don't think that actually works. Spaces at EOL are only
MDP preserved in templates from my experimentation. So we
Tuesday, January 18, 2000, 5:38:48 PM, Tom wrote:
So, then, on the arguement that you cite and seem to support, what are
your thoughts of adding NNTP support to The Bat!?
We've discussed it at length.
Certainly that seems like a slightly larger proposition than a few
checkboxes in the
Tuesday, January 18, 2000, 5:20:05 PM, Marck wrote:
SL *Steve then points out that in some editors that isn't needed
SL since it retains the column that the cursor was last in, even on
SL short lines, even if it positions the cursor on column 1 for the
SL one line between.* :)
Ah - so
Hi Steve,
On Tue, 18 Jan 2000 13:42:04 -0800GMT (19/01/2000, 05:42 +0800GMT),
Steve Lamb wrote:
SL The reply-to behavior is not a convention. It is a prompt or an option
SL for a prompt. It is partially dictated by a formal document (RFC822) and
SL therefore is closer to a standard than a
Hello Syafril,
Tuesday, January 18, 2000, 3:13:34 AM, you wrote:
The most problem for me with TB!'s redirect is *not create*
X-sender:[EMAIL PROTECTED] in the "redirect message" as Eudora
did.
Are you saying you *want* TB! to put in the X-sender field? If so,
try redirecting
Hi Tom,
On Tue, 18 Jan 2000 17:38:48 -0800GMT (19/01/2000, 09:38 +0800GMT),
Tom Plunket wrote:
TP I started programming 18 years ago. All of the editors I used did,
TP indeed, have what we could call virtual space.
Well, I started programming 22 years ago, and some our very first
programmes
On Wed, 19 Jan 2000 01:49:28 +, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
--
Ahem - I don't think that actually works. Spaces at EOL are only
preserved in templates from my experimentation. So we actually do get
dashdash no space. What's more, If we have the temerity to let the
cursor wander
Hi Tom,
On Tue, 18 Jan 2000 12:20:10 -0800GMT (19/01/2000, 04:20 +0800GMT),
Tom Plunket wrote:
TP Hey, do it a thousand times. That's a thousand wasted keystrokes.
TP I'm not saying one stroke is bad, but over the course of a day, it'd
TP be nice to have things behave like you expect.
Hit the
Hi Tom,
On Tue, 18 Jan 2000 12:00:20 -0800GMT (19/01/2000, 04:00 +0800GMT),
Tom Plunket wrote:
TP Is there a way to turn off that stupid (to me) quick search? I don't
TP want to quick search when I hit 'r', I meant to reply but am still
TP used to Agent...
I'm looking forward to turning that
Hi Steve,
On Tue, 18 Jan 2000 08:17:09 -0800GMT (19/01/2000, 00:17 +0800GMT),
Steve Lamb wrote:
Make a constructive suggestion. ;-)
SL I did. Encouraging broken behavior is not to be done, period. That is
SL broken behavior. By using it you cause problems. By not using it you don't
SL
On Wed, 19 Jan 2000 12:11:29 +0800, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
No. Constructive means you have an idea what to "do", not what to "not
do". (If that is English.) Your suggestion for redirect behaviour would
be to just leave the from addr intact? So you actually want to hide the
fact that you are
Hello Januk Aggarwal,
On Tue, 18 Jan 2000 at 19:27:17 [GMT -0800] your local time which was
Wednesday, January 19, 2000 10:27:17 [GMT +0700] my local time, you
told to the list:
The most problem for me with TB!'s redirect is *not create*
X-sender:[EMAIL PROTECTED] in the
Hello Markus,
Tuesday, January 18, 2000, 3:24:18 AM, you wrote:
Hi,
regarding that From bug:
this is something that some mail transport agents (probably list
softwares, too) do on purpose. In old Unix mailbox formats a line
beginning with "From " was recognized as a new message
Morning Tom Plunket,
message list message view account view
Ctrl+] nothing next unread next unread
i think you meant:
Ctrl+] next unread nothing next unread
But I do agree this is another inconsistency
Hi Allie,
On Tue, 18 Jan 2000 23:27:01 -0500GMT (19/01/2000, 12:27 +0800GMT),
Allie Martin wrote:
AM May I?
Sure. ;-)
AM If the recipient doesn't really want to see the original message
AM headers then forward the message.
Ah, but forwarding and redirecting are different things. If
On Wed, 19 Jan 2000 13:49:09 +0800, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
Ah, but forwarding and redirecting are different things. If I forward a
message to you and you hit "reply", you will reply to me. If I redirect
the same message and you hit "reply", you will reply to the original
sender.
Uhm.
Hi Allie,
On Wed, 19 Jan 2000 01:22:56 -0500GMT (19/01/2000, 14:22 +0800GMT),
Allie Martin wrote:
AM Well if he can make sense out of the X-Sender address then he'll
AM know.
What's the standard: If redirecting, does the X-Sender have to stay
intact? RFC#? In that case, Outlook is
Hello Allie,
Tuesday, January 18, 2000, 10:22:56 PM, you wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jan 2000 13:49:09 +0800, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
Otherwise this 'by way of . etc.' solution was being mentioned. Steve
quite rightfully said that it's a bad idea. The message header could
become filled with 'by
Hello, the Bat! list recipients,
Tuesday, January 18, 2000, Roel wrote to Marck D. Pearlstone about
disableling auto-bcc:
R too bad: that only creates massive overheads in the adressbook...
R also: keeping info up to date can be hell...
R oh well, i'll live :-)
You can enter an address
Hello, the Bat! list recipients,
Tuesday, January 18, 2000, Steve Lamb wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED] about
suggestion- / wish-list:
SL Tuesday, January 18, 2000, 1:41:55 AM, Oleg wrote:
It is just my personal opinion said by the way that adding some kind of a
hook for external editor to TB! will
Hi Allie,
On Wed, 19 Jan 2000 01:22:56 -0500GMT (19/01/2000, 14:22 +0800GMT),
Allie Martin wrote:
AM Send the original message informing the recipient clearly that you
AM sending a copy of the message and yet handing over the real deal untouched
AM copy MIME forward.
Allow me a
Hello Thomas Fernandez,
On Wed, 19 Jan 2000 at 15:08:46 [GMT +0800] your local time which
was Wednesday, January 19, 2000 14:08:46 [GMT +0700] my local time,
you told to the list:
AM Send the original message informing the recipient clearly that you
AM sending a copy of the message and
Hello, the Bat! list recipients,
Wednesday, January 19, 2000, tracer wrote to Nick Danger about
External editor (was:Re: suggestion- / wish-list):
I don't need excellent editor for editing mail. I am quite happy with
mediocre one. The main thing I want from it -- speed.
SL That is you.
100 matches
Mail list logo
