On Sat, 22 Jan 2000 12:19:07 +0800, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
[..snip..]
SL>> I recommend not doing it. "Techno-pritanical", to me, seems to
SL>> be used in an offensive manner. First off, don't munge the address
SL>> without a damned good reason. This is not a damned good reason.
> Didn't
On Sat, 22 Jan 2000 00:21:46 -0600, Douglas Hinds wrote:
[..snip..]
> You are right and I have noticed that. But - if you correct it, the
> next time around it will do it the was it was done last. As you say,
> it's auto completion, which sometimes helps and sometimes doesn't.
> Even then, the a
On Sat, 22 Jan 2000 13:02:07 +0800, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
[..snip..]
SL>> No, turn on message list in the view folder (remember, it isn't view
SL>> message) window.
> Latest on this (and closing statement): I've found this virutal
> folder, I *love* it, and have no idea how I ever lived w
On Sat, 22 Jan 2000 12:05:03 +0800, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
>>> off-list reply is Ctrl-F4. It works every time. Get used to it and
>>> avoid embarrassing stains - I mean - incidents. ;-)
MG>> Careful with your suggestions. This doesn't work when somebody, such
MG>> as me, has '%TO=""%TO="TBUDL <
Hallo Steve,
On Fri, 21 Jan 2000 22:47:28 -0800 GMT (22.01.2000, 14:47 +0800 GMT),
Steve Lamb wrote:
>> What is the purpose of this renewed discussion?
SL> The fact that making it an option still doesn't remove it as a bug?
Even nobody seems to have changed his/her opinion about this quest
Hello Jast & all fellow TBUDL members,
Friday, January 21, 2000, 11:14:43 PM, Jast wrote in response the
question:
>> How long did it take you all to get a working installation of TB!? It
>> took me a long time. That was a lot of work.
J> IIRC, it took me about an hour or two the very fir
Friday, January 21, 2000, 8:19:07 PM, Thomas wrote:
> Didn't we go through this a couple of months ago, with the result that
> you can switch it off? "Do NOT use FROM name for REPLY-TO address"
> Account/Properties/Templates/Reply. What is the purpose of this
> renewed discussion?
The fact th
Hallo Douglas,
On Sat, 22 Jan 2000 00:19:59 -0600 GMT (22.01.2000, 14:19 +0800 GMT),
Douglas Hinds wrote some emotional stuff.
Take it off-list, please.
--
Cheers,
Thomas mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message reply created with The Bat! 1.39
under Chinese Windows 98 4.
Hallo Steve et al,
On Fri, 21 Jan 2000 09:26:34 -0800 GMT (22.01.2000, 01:26 +0800 GMT),
Steve Lamb wrote:
>> Do I have to configure the ticker somewhere?
SL> No, turn on message list in the view folder (remember, it isn't view
SL> message) window.
Latest on this (and closing statement): I
Hallo Tom,
On Fri, 21 Jan 2000 13:00:49 -0800 GMT (22.01.2000, 05:00 +0800 GMT),
Tom Plunket wrote:
TF>> I tried it again, and: the Dispatcher no longer deletes! I know it
TF>> worked in an earlier version, but today it definitely did not.
TF>> Furthermore, my killfilter didn't kill this message
Hallo Markus,
On Fri, 21 Jan 2000 18:01:39 +0100 GMT (22.01.2000, 01:01 +0800 GMT),
Markus Gloede wrote:
>> off-list reply is Ctrl-F4. It works every time. Get used to it and
>> avoid embarrassing stains - I mean - incidents. ;-)
MG> Careful with your suggestions. This doesn't work when somebod
Hello Tom & all fellow TBUDL members,
Friday, January 21, 2000, 4:55:06 PM, Tom wrote in response to my saying:
DH>> You are saying then that you are unhappy with that design choice.
DH>> I would think that with your skill you could design an email
DH>> client to your own ideals. Alternatively,
Hello Peter & all fellow TBUDL members,
Friday, January 21, 2000, 6:17:42 PM, Peter wrote in response to my saying:
>> The file - that was downloaded on Jan 19 from
>> http://www.ritlabs.com/ftp/pub/the_bat/the_bat.exe
>> is evidently not a compressed file and wants to go into a setup
>> routin
Friday, January 21, 2000, 10:19:59 PM, Douglas wrote:
> You obviously have a number of options, including the intentional
> distortion of my remarks, making snide remarks of your own and
> disregarding the moderators request to drop the excessive antagonism
> you've chosen to associate with this t
Hallo Steve,
On Fri, 21 Jan 2000 10:14:07 -0800 GMT (22.01.2000, 02:14 +0800 GMT),
Steve Lamb wrote:
>> I can tell when someone has replied to one of my postings and zoom in on it
>> as a point of interest.
SL> You can do that with threading or having a filter search for your MSGID
SL> iden
Hallo Steve,
On Fri, 21 Jan 2000 09:24:03 -0800 GMT (22.01.2000, 01:24 +0800 GMT),
Steve Lamb wrote:
>> This is very important to filter "bcc:".
SL> How? :)
Some people may have a need for it. Use Presence in "kludges" instead
of recipients. ;-)
--
Cheers,
Thomas
Hello Allie & almost all fellow TBUDL members,
Friday, January 21, 2000, 5:56:42 PM, Allie wrote in response to my saying:
>> That bugs must be fixed is a truism. If it's a bug, it must be fixed
>> or squashed, let live, industrialized or released in a field (if a
>> predator, pathogen or paras
> on Thu, 20 Jan 2000, at 00:07:24 local time (GMT -0800), nurmot wrote:
>> "No Application is associated w/the specified file for this application".
then you wrote:
> try putting this line in prefs.js... worth a try.
Thanks, Rob, for your efforts. Unfortunately that's not the problem
(
Morning Allie Martin,
> The netiquette rules are global.
Not necessarily... I'm involved in a community where shouting is just
another way of expressing irony or used for fun, were you greet each other
with "BITCH" and the likes and a song consisting only of cusswords is the
t
Morning Tom Plunket,
> How long did it take you all to get a working installation of TB!? It
> took me a long time. That was a lot of work.
Let's see...
IIRC, it took me about an hour or two the very first time, which I think is
okay considering all I had used before was the ugly Co
Morning Nick Andriash,
> If it's the originating computer system time that is at fault, changing to
> "Received time", which I presume is the time my Server get's the message,
> will correct the anomaly of having the originating message somewhere other
> than at the beginning of the thread.
Ac
Hallo JWorley,
On Fri, 21 Jan 2000 21:46:33 -0600 GMT (22.01.2000, 11:46 +0800 GMT),
JWorley wrote:
J> I have noticed that even though I have set the properties on certain
J> folders to delete messages after X number of days, the messages are
J> never deleted unless I go into the folders and
On Fri, 21 Jan 2000 21:46:33 -0600, JWorley wrote:
> I have noticed that even though I have set the properties on certain
> folders to delete messages after X number of days, the messages are
> never deleted unless I go into the folders and manually delete them. Is
> this a problem / bug or a
Hi All,
I have noticed that even though I have set the properties on certain
folders to delete messages after X number of days, the messages are
never deleted unless I go into the folders and manually delete them.
Is this a problem / bug or am I doing something wrong? I do not
have any of
On Thu, 20 Jan 2000 15:10:19 -0600, Douglas Hinds wrote:
> The file - that was downloaded on Jan 19 from
> http://www.ritlabs.com/ftp/pub/the_bat/the_bat.exe
> is evidently not a compressed file and wants to go into a setup
> routine when I click on it. Do I need to go through that?
It is a self
On Fri, 21 Jan 2000 16:49:19 +0100, Rob wrote:
>> Ah yes, a not so quick search of my archives revealed that the file
>> in question is the prefs.js file.
> yep ... that one and liprefs.js ; i'd love to have a list of all possible
> entries/values for those files !!
There is (or was) a list s
On Friday, January 21, 2000, 8:22:40 AM, Rob wrote:
> oh yeah, and then click the 'creation time' column header so the arrow
> points up (ascending ?) ;-)
Yes, this works for me... keeps the most recent reply in the thread, at
the bottom, so it keeps the conversation in some intelligible order.
Friday, January 21, 2000, 4:16:20 PM, Allie wrote:
> Uhm, errr, *light cough*, OK. I didn't consider that at all. *Allie
> hangs his head in shame and embarrassment* :)
Touche' monsieur pussycat!
> Ok, take a look at this message and tell me what you think. I'll try
> to keep it up
On Fri, 21 Jan 2000 16:06:35 -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
>> It's kind of dogmatic to the point where it's beginning to sound
>> fanatical, especially since the feature may be disabled. But hey,
>> that's just me.
> Really? Tell me why people's replies to me still have my name attached to
> an
Friday, January 21, 2000, 3:49:17 PM, Allie wrote:
> It's kind of dogmatic to the point where it's beginning to sound fanatical,
> especially since the feature may be disabled. But hey, that's just me.
>
Really? Tell me why people's replies to me still have my name attached to
an address I
Friday, January 21, 2000, 3:18:05 PM, Douglas wrote:
> These are established conventions then?
Yes. Do not munge headers.
> But what TB is doing is making use of non-essential but also
> non-confidential user supplied data. The supposition being that it's there
> to be used.
The assump
Friday, January 21, 2000, 2:55:06 PM, Tom wrote:
> I finally got it. Perhaps The Bat! only prepends the name when there
> is no non-email-address name? Would it be fixed if the Reply-To was
> set to "TBUDL "? Dunno, but maybe this is what The Bat!
> originally intended to do; put a proper name
Friday, January 21, 2000, 1:49:45 PM, Douglas wrote:
> While most respond to sender when typing Ctrl+F5, ALL responded to
> sender using Ctrl+F4. Therefore, I would say that all lists are not
> the same and that Marck was correct in recommending the use of Ctrl+F4
> when replying to sender only.
Hello Alexander & all fellow TBUDL members,
Friday, January 21, 2000, 4:27:58 PM, Alexander wrote in response to
my saying:
>> Interesting logic. I wonder how many other TUBDL subscribers share
>> that concern.
When Steve said:
>> SL> That technical requirement doesn't exist in email. I am
>
On Sat, 22 Jan 2000 01:27:58 +0300, Alexander V. Kiselev wrote:
[..snip..]
> 2. As Steve has already pointed out, the addresses like
> "Alexander V. Kiselev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> get filled into the MRU list, where from TB gets them for autocompletion. This
> *is* a _severe_ bug, regardless o
On Fri, 21 Jan 2000 17:18:05 -0600, Douglas Hinds wrote:
[..snip..]
> That bugs must be fixed is a truism. If it's a bug, it must be fixed
> or squashed, let live, industrialized or released in a field (if a
> predator, pathogen or parasite of a pest). But it sounds like a design
> choice though
Hello all,
on Thu, 20 Jan 2000, at 00:07:24 local time (GMT -0800), nurmot wrote:
> "No Application is associated w/the specified file for this application".
try putting this line in prefs.js and liprefs.js :
user_pref("browser.wfe.ignore_def_check", false);
make sure it's in the right place,
SL>> No. My bone is with TB! doing something it should not be doing,
SL>> period. If I set my reply-to to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I don't
SL>> want people sending mail to "Steve Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>".
I finally got it. Perhaps The Bat! only prepends the name when there
is no non-email-address name
Hi there!
On 21 Jan 00, at 15:49, Douglas Hinds wrote
about "Re[2]: Ctrl-F4":
> SL> That technical requirement doesn't exist in email. I am
> SL> [EMAIL PROTECTED] That is all that is needed to route mail to
> SL> me. The name in front is a comment, nothing more. However, having
> SL> a comm
Hello Steve & all fellow TBUDL members,
Friday, January 21, 2000, 2:16:00 PM, Steve wrote in response to
Marck's saying:
>> What, all lists are the same?
After Steve said:
SL>>> Other lists are different?
I just tried replying with TB to 6 lists related to my work (which is
not computer rela
Hi Tom,
On 21 January 2000 at 12:12:38 GMT -0800 (which was 20:12 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points:
TP> a doc type is registered, but doesn't show up there? *
TP> Windows.
Ahem! There is a language constraint on this list, Please be more
careful in
\\\|///
/ ~ _ \
(- O o -)
--oOOo-(_)-oOOo---
Hello Tom,
TP> That's so beautiful it makes me want to cry. Now the problem is
TP> those damned forsaken Windows "hidden types" or whatever... You
TP>
\\\|///
/ ~ _ \
(- O o -)
--oOOo-(_)-oOOo---
Hello Steve,
SL> Asside from announce-only lists where there are no replies can you
SL> think of a list where replies aren't made to individuals? :)
TF> I tried it again, and: the Dispatcher no longer deletes! I know it
TF> worked in an earlier version, but today it definitely did not.
TF> Furthermore, my killfilter didn't kill this message to
TF> [EMAIL PROTECTED] - it used to.
Works here on my installation, see headers for version.
-tom!
Hello Roel!
> have you tried all your accounts to log-in to tb! ?
> so there still should be 1 account with admin-rights.
That solved it!
Thanks a lot!!!
--
regards,
-cw-
<===>
Christian Weiss . logisch - so macht Internet Sinn.
A-1230 Wie
>> It also seems to me that software should assimilate and be responsive
>> to the needs of its users - not vice versa.
J> True, but it's hard for software itself to do so. Sure, you can make it
J> super-customizable, but that will always mean work for the user to customize
J> it.
How
On Friday, January 21, 2000 at 08:22:40 ,Rob scribbled:
R> oh yeah, and then click the 'creation time' column header so the arrow
R> points up (ascending ?) ;-)
I have mine pointing down, so that the most recent message is displayed first :D That
way
when I open the thread, all the recent messag
On Friday, January 21, 2000 at 12:33:29 , I scribbled and *need an eraser* :
A> It takes some servers forever to receive things,
Make that "Receive/Deliver"
Sorry 'bout that :D
Regards,
~~~Angel ...your RDR
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
"No hay extraños en este mundo, simplemente amigos
TP>> I have four words I could say to that, but I won't.
DH> he failed to take my comment to heart and reacted stupidly.
DH> The four words he refers to are obviously offensive ones.
"obviously" to some perhaps. To me, inappropriate to the list but not
necessarily offensive. Reacting stupidly?
\\\|///
/ ~ _ \
(- O o -)
--oOOo-(_)-oOOo---
Hello Christian,
CW> As I have no administrator rights any more, I cannot create any
CW> new accounts with THE BAT!
have you tried all your accounts
On Friday, January 21, 2000 at 07:19:52 ,Thomas scribbled:
TF> Have you tried:
TF> view - sort by - received time
TF> instead?
The only reason I have it sort by creation time is because when I tried it by Received
time, for
some reason the emails in the thread seem to jump all over the place as
Friday, January 21, 2000, 11:55:25 AM, Marck wrote:
SL>> Other lists are different?
> What, all lists are the same?
Asside from announce-only lists where there are no replies can you think
of a list where replies aren't made to individuals? :)
> Not from my POV, however. My name is "Ma
TP>> In this vein, can anyone tell me where the startup sequence for the
TP>> webbrowser is stored so I can have it call IE differently?
WK> in windows explorer: View | folder options | HTML Document
That's so beautiful it makes me want to cry. Now the problem is those
damned forsaken Windows "
>> That seems too configurable and easy to be from a MS product...
AM> To all those who didn't look for the option assuming that in MS
AM> Windows tradition it would not be there, call a spade a spade will ya?
AM> :)))
Doesn't appear to be there in IE4.
Regarding "the browser should fix
On Fri, 21 Jan 2000 11:29:47 -0800, Nick Andriash wrote:
> I have my storage options set to zero seeing as I've got cable, and am
> always on-line. However, if you store articles with Xnews, it doesn't
> make sense to have to quickly go on-line to retrieve them... should they
> not be "stored" as
On Fri, 21 Jan 2000 09:21:53 -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
> Also who said colors are for news. Personally I find black on white
> blinding. I am upset at Windows for tying certain color values together
> which force people to use a dark on light color scheme than a light on
> dark. Configuring
Hi there!
On 21 Jan 00, at 0:03, Januk Aggarwal wrote
about "Re: Web hyperlinks don't work":
> > Although I don't use IE primarily and use Opera 95% of the time ( I
> > more enjoy the shell enhancements such as the quick launch bar and the
> > start menu enhancements) I decided to look a
Hi Steve,
On 21 January 2000 at 10:14:07 GMT -0800 (which was 18:14 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points:
I really didn't want to get into this. :-(
>> Replies on *this* list are usually to the individual making the
>> original posting.
SL> Other lists are di
On Friday, January 21, 2000, 8:44:59 AM, Allie Martin wrote:
> Yes, but I can't seem to get at these stored messages without first
> going online and opening the group with the connection going. You could
> however disconnect after having opened the group and continue reading
> offline.
I ha
Hi tracer,
On 21 January 2000 at 00:10:34 GMT +0700 (which was 17:10 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points:
Marck>> So - this line's a DEAD HORSE folks.
t> Just one question, how many dead horses have been generated so
t> far??? have you ever counted them ???
Just doin
Hi Markus,
On 21 January 2000 at 18:01:39 GMT +0100 (which was 17:01 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points:
>> off-list reply is Ctrl-F4. It works every time. Get used to it and
>> avoid embarrassing stains - I mean - incidents. ;-)
MG> Careful with your suggestions. Th
Friday, January 21, 2000, 10:03:52 AM, Marck wrote:
> Replies on *this* list are usually to the individual making the original
> posting.
Other lists are different?
> The TB name munging, although repugnant to some, works perfectly to promote
> very sensible and legible conversation.
No
Hallo Juergen Frisch!
>But what about trying to create a new
>account, which is the old in fact?
As I have no administrator rights any more, I cannot create any
new accounts with THE BAT!
--
regards
-cw-
<===>
Christian Weiss . lo
Hi Tom,
TP> In this vein, can anyone tell me where the startup sequence for the
TP> webbrowser is stored so I can have it call IE differently?
in windows explorer: View | folder options | HTML Document
--
Regards,
Wolfgang
Co-moderator TBUDL / TBBETA discussion lists
Using The Bat! 1.38e und
Friday, January 21, 2000, 8:30:16 AM, Nick wrote:
> I was thinking more about this Steve, and remembered that Xnews has a
> storage feature. Would not storing of bodies serve the same purpose as
> running Hamster with Xnews? Are they not one in the same, only using
> different Folders basically?
Thursday, January 20, 2000, 7:51:44 PM, Thomas wrote:
> There was also a discussion about an adiitional flag, "seen" (as
> opposed ot new or read), with which messages could be marked that need
> relpies. I haven't heard whether this will be available in v2, but
> think not.
This is done some
Friday, January 21, 2000, 12:58:19 AM, tracer wrote:
> To me it seems to be a bug if replying to a msg DOESNT reset the
> incoming msg as read.,..
I don't. Who says I read it? Sounds dumb, but it is true in some cases.
For example, reply, "Hi, I'm busy, will get to this later..."
--
Friday, January 21, 2000, 2:56:11 AM, Allie wrote:
> trimmed) is far more than what I have written and if I'm sure that I still
> want to send? Now tell me
In Gravity (IIRC) there is an option to set a threshold on that warning.
IE, messages under x lines don't get checked on the quote r
Friday, January 21, 2000, 5:14:17 AM, Syafril wrote:
> This is very important to filter "bcc:".
How? :)
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
ICQ: 5107343 | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
-
Friday, January 21, 2000, 7:56:50 AM, Thomas wrote:
> Do I have to configure the ticker somewhere?
No, turn on message list in the view folder (remember, it isn't view
message) window.
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
ICQ: 5107343
Hello Angel,
On Fri, 21 Jan 2000 06:49:55 -0800 GMT your local time,
which was Friday, January 21, 2000, 9:49:55 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Angel wrote:
Angel> Hello fellow Bataholics!
Angel> I don't know how I configured it
Angel> but I have Netscape 4.7 as my default browser and the clic
Hello Thomas Fernandez,
On Fri, 21 Jan 2000 22:23:46 +0800 GMT your local time,
which was Friday, January 21, 2000, 9:23:46 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Thomas Fernandez wrote:
Thomas> I jsut tried it by randomly sending 7 messages to myself *and by
Thomas> mistake to the list as well, my ap
Hello Marck D. Pearlstone,
On Fri, 21 Jan 2000 14:29:12 + GMT your local time,
which was Friday, January 21, 2000, 9:29:12 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
Marck> So - this line's a DEAD HORSE folks.
Just one question, how many dead horses have been generated so far???
Hi Thomas,
On 21 January 2000 at 23:56:50 GMT +0800 (which was 15:56 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points:
TF> I tried again and failed. :-(. When I double-click on the ticker,
TF> one message will be shown as View Folder (full screen). With all
TF> headers ("kludges")
Hallo Allie,
On Fri, 21 Jan 2000 11:17:50 -0500 GMT (22.01.2000, 00:17 +0800 GMT),
Allie Martin wrote:
AM> Instead of sending yourself messages and tying up your mail server
AM> among other mishaps, you may generate some unread messages by going
AM> through a few folders, selecting a couple
On Fri, 21 Jan 2000 08:30:16 -0800, Nick Andriash wrote:
>> Wild guess, Hamster is a local news server. XNews doesn't have true
>> offline reading capabilities so it needs a local news server to do that.
> I was thinking more about this Steve, and remembered that Xnews has a
> storage featu
Friday, January 21, 2000, 16:08, Christian Weiss wrote:
> I tried out to configure account groups in order to access
> certain user accounts, but now the network/administration menu
> has disappeared and I cannot revert my configuration of THE BAT to
> default (accessing all accounts
Hi,
On Friday, January 21, 2000, 3:29:12 PM, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
> off-list reply is Ctrl-F4. It works every time. Get used to it and
> avoid embarrassing stains - I mean - incidents. ;-)
Careful with your suggestions. This doesn't work when somebody, such
as me, has '%TO=""%TO="TBUDL <[
On Thursday, January 20, 2000, 8:01:43 AM, Steve Lamb wrote:
> Thursday, January 20, 2000, 7:54:19 AM, Nick wrote:
>> I'm just curious, but what purpose would be served by trying to run
>> Xnews with Hamster? What added functionality would it serve that is not
>> already present in Xnews?
>
Morning Syafril Hermansyah,
> Great, how did you know that, by trial ?
No. I just read every single mail here. It was discussed before, this was
mentioned.
--
+--Jast
|on Windows 98 4.10 Build A
:with The Bat! 1.39
--
---
Hello all,
on Fri, 21 Jan 2000, at 15:49:59 local time (GMT +0100), Rob wrote:
> view - sort by - creation time
oh yeah, and then click the 'creation time' column header so the arrow
points up (ascending ?) ;-)
--
Rob ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] )
using The Bat! 1.39 Beta/1
... Work hard for eight h
On Friday, January 21, 2000, 7:19:52 AM, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
> Have you tried:
> view - sort by - received time
> instead?
Well Thomas, I'm going to give that a try, and see if it alleviates the
problem with having the original message strangely stuck in the middle
of a thread. If it's the o
Hallo Marck,
On Fri, 21 Jan 2000 15:38:30 + GMT (21.01.2000, 23:38 +0800 GMT),
Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
TF>> I jsut tried it by randomly sending 7 messages to myself *and
TF>> by mistake to the list as well, my apologies to all!, but
TF>> my ticker is just a ticker. I don't hav
On Friday, January 21, 2000, 6:49:59 AM, Rob wrote:
> on Thu, 20 Jan 2000, at 08:15:32 local time (GMT -0800), Nick wrote:
>> Still, I'll see a thread where the first message is the original, as it
>> should be, then most, but not all, of the replies are listed in
>> descending order with the li
On Fri, 21 Jan 2000 22:23:46 +0800, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
> I jsut tried it by randomly sending 7 messages to myself *and by
> mistake to the list as well, my apologies to all!, but my
> ticker is just a ticker. I don't have a virtual folder behind it. :-(
:)))
Instead of
Hello all,
on Fri, 21 Jan 2000, at 00:03:55 local time (GMT -0800), Januk wrote:
> Ah yes, a not so quick search of my archives revealed that the file
> in question is the prefs.js file.
yep ... that one and liprefs.js ; i'd love to have a list of all possible
entries/values for those files !
Hello all,
on Thu, 20 Jan 2000, at 00:07:24 local time (GMT -0800), nurmot wrote:
> Clicking on a URL, or rt. clicking and selecting OPEN THIS LINK, gives
> this error message: "No Application is associated w/ the specified file
> for this application".
sounds like Netscape is not your default
Hi Thomas,
On 21 January 2000 at 22:23:46 GMT +0800 (which was 14:23 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points:
TF> I jsut tried it by randomly sending 7 messages to myself *and
TF> by mistake to the list as well, my apologies to all!, but
TF> my ticker is just a
On Thursday, January 20, 2000 at 09:29:16 ,Nick scribbled:
NA> Is that sort by subject Angel, or view threads by subject? I wonder what
NA> the difference in the two would be?
View / View Threads By / Subject
View / Sort By / Creation Time
These are the two settings I use.
I also have the "Crea
Hello TBUDL,
and thanks y'all who have sent me off-list messages that my template
is wrong. You have seen my latest msg to Marck: it was my mistake.
Sorry again. (No pop-up window "are you really really sure?" came
up.)
A question comes to mind: When you select multiple messages to
forward, and
Hallo Rob,
On Fri, 21 Jan 2000 15:49:59 +0100 GMT (21.01.2000, 22:49 +0800 GMT),
Rob wrote:
R> i'm using :
R> view - display - all messages
R> view - sort by - creation time
R> view - view threads by - subject
R> works fine. only when someone's PC clock is off, his replies will all be at
R> the
Hello TBUDL!
I tried out to configure account groups in order to access
certain user accounts, but now the network/administration menu
has disappeared and I cannot revert my configuration of THE BAT
to default (accessing all accounts without having to log in as a
certain user).
How
Hello fellow Bataholics!
I don't know how I configured it
but I have Netscape 4.7 as my default browser and the clickable URLs in TB! work
whether
Netscape is open or closed. It will bring up Netscape if it's closed, and use the
current
window if open.
Just general info: I use Opera AWA IE
Hello all,
on Thu, 20 Jan 2000, at 08:15:32 local time (GMT -0800), Nick wrote:
> Still, I'll see a thread where the first message is the original, as it
> should be, then most, but not all, of the replies are listed in
> descending order with the little + sign next to each one.
the replies to
Hallo Marck,
On Fri, 21 Jan 2000 14:20:14 + GMT (21.01.2000, 22:20 +0800 GMT),
Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
MDP> See my reply to tracer. The ticker is just a "silly window" (no
MDP> offence Max/Stef) which provides an access point to the actual virtual
MDP> folder you describe. Why req
On Fri, 21 Jan 2000 14:06:09 +, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
> As for the ticker as a ticker - IMHO it's irrelevant. As would be a
> boxed list of messages. I find it impossible to use it for pinpointing
> a start place for message reading or, with 100+ messages per sitting,
> as an overvi
Hi Douglas,
On 21 January 2000 at 07:57:23 GMT -0600 (which was 13:57 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points:
DH> As mentioned earlier, the second set of comments made by me under
DH> the heading:
DH> Re[2]: TB! v 1.39 Installation was NOT intended for TBUDL.
[snip]
D
Hello TBUDL!
--
Ciao,
Thomas mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Generated with The Bat! 1.39
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998
using an Intel Celeron 366 Mhz, 128MB RAM
--
--
View the TBUDL archive at htt
Hello TBUDL!
--
Ciao,
Thomas mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Generated with The Bat! 1.39
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998
using an Intel Celeron 366 Mhz, 128MB RAM
--
--
View the TBUDL archive at htt
Hello TBUDL!
--
Ciao,
Thomas mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Generated with The Bat! 1.39
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998
using an Intel Celeron 366 Mhz, 128MB RAM
--
--
View the TBUDL archive at htt
1 - 100 of 133 matches
Mail list logo
