Hello all,
Could someone please help me set this thing straight?
I want to back up my mails in exported form and I just can't make it work.
When using the EXPORT function some of my mailboxes don't get exported
correctly (some or all messages missing in the export).
I get this irrespective of
Hello Allie,
On Thursday, January 20, 2000 at 22:09:57 GMT -0500 (which was 7:09 PM where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
> Although I don't use IE primarily and use Opera 95% of the time ( I
> more enjoy the shell enhancements such as the quick launch bar and the
> start menu enhanceme
Hi Thomas,
On Fri, 21 Jan 2000 15:38:32 +0800GMT (21/01/2000, 15:38 +0800GMT),
Thomas Fernandez wrote a little too fast:
DH>> The prodigy.net.mx server TBUDL & the Opera lists come in on provides
DH>> little storage space and I plan on being elsewhere and off line for a
DH>> few days, so I decid
Hi Thomas,
On 21 January 2000 at 11:51:44 GMT +0800 (which was 03:51 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points:
FW>> I will often read through incoming mail quickly, and reply later.
TF> You have basically disabled the function of marking messages as
TF> "read" when you "re
Hi Marck,
On Fri, 21 Jan 2000 09:45:22 +GMT (21/01/2000, 17:45 +0800GMT),
Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
MDP> To expand on this, I do the same and hit Alt-F2 (or the "Save Draft"
MDP> button / menu option) immediately, thus parking the reply in the
MDP> OutBox. Any replies I subsequent
Hello Christopher J. Trybowski,
On Thu, 20 Jan 2000 01:29:54 +0100 GMT your local time,
which was Thursday, January 20, 2000, 7:29:54 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Christopher J. Trybowski wrote:
Christopher> Hello Allie,
Christopher> On Wednesday, January 19, 2000 you wrote:
Christopher> [Gravit
Hello Douglas Hinds,
On Thu, 20 Jan 2000 15:10:19 -0600 GMT your local time,
which was Friday, January 21, 2000, 4:10:19 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Douglas Hinds wrote:
Douglas> Hello fellow TBUDL members,
Douglas> Wednesday, Jan 19, 2000 07:13:30 I wrote to ask:
Douglas> Does upgrading fro
Hello Tom Plunket,
On Thu, 20 Jan 2000 12:42:57 -0800 GMT your local time,
which was Friday, January 21, 2000, 3:42:57 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Tom Plunket wrote:
Tom>>> If you were to come to get carpal tunnel syndrome (which has been
Tom>>> extending its talons into me recently), you'll c
Hello Thomas Fernandez,
On Fri, 21 Jan 2000 11:51:44 +0800 GMT your local time,
which was Friday, January 21, 2000, 10:51:44 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Thomas Fernandez wrote:
Thomas> Hi Fred,
Thomas> On Thu, 20 Jan 2000 21:09:18 -0500GMT (21/01/2000, 10:09 +0800GMT),
Thomas> Fred Weissman wro
Hello Tom Plunket,
On Thu, 20 Jan 2000 18:18:26 -0800 GMT your local time,
which was Friday, January 21, 2000, 9:18:26 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Tom Plunket wrote:
Tom> [sorry list, but this is list-related. ;)]
Tom> G. Cowling:
Tom> Hey, you emailed me but I'm denied from your mailbox! I
Hello Fred Weissman,
On Thu, 20 Jan 2000 21:09:18 -0500 GMT your local time,
which was Friday, January 21, 2000, 9:09:18 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Fred Weissman wrote:
Fred> Has any thought been given to a feature (option?) whereby a message becomes
Fred> automatically marked as read once it h
Hello G. Cowling, SRNA,
On Fri, 21 Jan 2000 00:18:53 -0500 GMT your local time,
which was Friday, January 21, 2000, 12:18:53 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
G. Cowling, SRNA wrote:
G.> in response to my saying:
DH>>> but while many of your comments may be helpful, I strongly suggest
DH>>> you susp
On Fri, 21 Jan 2000 00:18:53 -0500, G. Cowling, SRNA wrote:
DH>>> but while many of your comments may be helpful, I strongly suggest
DH>>> you suspend your assumptions to a greater degree and try to
DH>>> assimilate the approach TB takes to windows email.
> I'd probably have taken this response
Hello Allie Martin,
On Thu, 20 Jan 2000 06:20:52 -0500 GMT your local time,
which was Thursday, January 20, 2000, 6:20:52 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Allie Martin wrote:
Allie> On Thu, 20 Jan 2000 01:29:54 +0100, Christopher J. Trybowski wrote:
>> [Gravity]
>>> Yes, but considering that I
On Fri, 21 Jan 2000 06:45:00 +0100, Jast wrote:
> True, but it's hard for software itself to do so. Sure, you can
> make it super-customizable, but that will always mean work for the
> user to customize it. If you get to learn a new software with new
> paradigms, you should try to get
On Fri, 21 Jan 2000 00:03:55 -0800, Januk Aggarwal wrote:
[..snip..]
>> For Internet Explorer (I'm using version 5 here) go to the 'Internet
>> Options' applet and select the 'advanced' tab. In that list there is an
>> option which goes like this:
>> "Reuse windows for launching sho
Hi Thomas,
On 21 January 2000 at 18:06:18 GMT +0800 (which was 10:06 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points:
MDP>> (I think that's what you meant).
TF> Yes, it is. But I save the "drafts" (really only quotes) only if I
TF> think it will take a long time (having a lunch b
Hello Marck D. Pearlstone,
On Fri, 21 Jan 2000 10:51:34 + GMT your local time,
which was Friday, January 21, 2000, 5:51:34 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
Marck> Hi Thomas,
Marck> On 21 January 2000 at 18:06:18 GMT +0800 (which was 10:06 where I
Marck> live) [EMAIL
Hi Stefan,
you wrote on Thursday, January 20, 2000, 16:55:09:
ST> Hello Ralf,
RB>> However, it would be interesting to know which headers are considered to
RB>> be a "Sender" in The Bat!. Maybe one of the developers can shed some
RB>> light on this?
ST> AFAICR, Sender = From / Reply-To / Ret
Friday, January 21, 2000
Hello Bat-users,
A while ago i think Thomas complained about relaying problems from
local isps when you are on a different provider then the one where
your smtp/pop is.
Ok, I have an smtp up and running on an usa server which at present
is under testing to all
On Thu, 20 Jan 2000 18:52:26 +0700, tracer wrote:
>>> Yes, but considering that I have to pay for the damn thing, the
>>> editor is UTTERLY unacceptable. How can you create a popup message
>>> saying that the flow of text is too long and that some readers may
>>> have problems reading the
On Thu, 20 Jan 2000 22:50:45 -0600, Douglas Hinds wrote:
AM>> Yes you can, with no harm to your installation. It will simply
AM>> upgrade the relevant files. I have been using the same TB install
AM>> through all the upgrades since April, 1999.
> OK. So there's no needed to download the .exe onl
Hello Allie Martin,
On Fri, 21 Jan 2000 05:56:11 -0500 GMT your local time,
which was Friday, January 21, 2000, 5:56:11 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Allie Martin wrote:
Allie> On Thu, 20 Jan 2000 18:52:26 +0700, tracer wrote:
(snip)
\ X-News gives a reformat facility. Agent says nothing o
Hello fellow TBUDL members,
I see I mistakenly sent what was meant to be an off list post to TBUDL.
I'll have to watch that.
Douglas
As for any additional misinterpretations of my original remarks: What
I said still goes for all concerned and see me off list if that's a
problem.
Douglas
--
On Fri, 21 Jan 2000 18:35:51 +0700, tracer wrote:
Allie>> Well, you should, especially if it needs to be to make it easier for
Allie>> people to read it. :)
> It is easy, I start a sentence at the begin of a line and goto the
> next one before its gets to long.
> I may add a paragraph or so
Hello Stefan Tanurkov,
On Thursday, January 20, 2000 at 17:55:09 GMT +0200 (which was
21/01/2000 22:55 GMT + 0700 my Local Time) you told to the list:
ST> AFAICR, Sender = From / Reply-To / Return-path
I would suggest, to add Recipient = for not only To:, that's meet RFC
rule.
This is
Hallo Marck,
On Fri, 21 Jan 2000 10:51:34 + GMT (21.01.2000, 18:51 +0800 GMT),
Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
MDP> I couldn't survive without the ticker's virtual folder mechanism to
MDP> group all that new email in created order and neatly threading across
MDP> accounts / folders. I real
Hello all fellow TBUDL members,
As mentioned earlier, the second set of comments made by me under the
heading:
Re[2]: TB! v 1.39 Installation was NOT intended for TBUDL.
(Using Ctrl+F2 when replying to some of the lists I subscribe to gives
just the person replied to, while Shift+Ctrl+F2 give
Hi tracer,
On 21 January 2000 at 18:15:07 GMT +0700 (which was 11:15 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points:
t> So what about making it a box instead of a scrolling bar? I dislike
t> the scroll as I want to see more then one thing at the same time.
t> If essentially i
Hi Thomas,
On 21 January 2000 at 21:40:58 GMT +0800 (which was 13:40 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points:
MDP>> I couldn't survive without the ticker's virtual folder mechanism
MDP>> to group all that new email in created order and neatly
MDP>> threading acr
Hello TBUDL!
--
Ciao,
Thomas mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Generated with The Bat! 1.39
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998
using an Intel Celeron 366 Mhz, 128MB RAM
--
--
View the TBUDL archive at htt
Hello TBUDL!
--
Ciao,
Thomas mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Generated with The Bat! 1.39
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998
using an Intel Celeron 366 Mhz, 128MB RAM
--
--
View the TBUDL archive at htt
Hello TBUDL!
--
Ciao,
Thomas mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Generated with The Bat! 1.39
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998
using an Intel Celeron 366 Mhz, 128MB RAM
--
--
View the TBUDL archive at htt
Hello TBUDL!
--
Ciao,
Thomas mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Generated with The Bat! 1.39
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998
using an Intel Celeron 366 Mhz, 128MB RAM
--
--
View the TBUDL archive at htt
Hello TBUDL!
--
Ciao,
Thomas mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Generated with The Bat! 1.39
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998
using an Intel Celeron 366 Mhz, 128MB RAM
--
--
View the TBUDL archive at htt
Hello TBUDL!
--
Ciao,
Thomas mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Generated with The Bat! 1.39
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998
using an Intel Celeron 366 Mhz, 128MB RAM
--
--
View the TBUDL archive at htt
Hi Douglas,
On 21 January 2000 at 07:57:23 GMT -0600 (which was 13:57 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points:
DH> As mentioned earlier, the second set of comments made by me under
DH> the heading:
DH> Re[2]: TB! v 1.39 Installation was NOT intended for TBUDL.
[snip]
D
On Fri, 21 Jan 2000 14:06:09 +, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
> As for the ticker as a ticker - IMHO it's irrelevant. As would be a
> boxed list of messages. I find it impossible to use it for pinpointing
> a start place for message reading or, with 100+ messages per sitting,
> as an overvi
Hallo Marck,
On Fri, 21 Jan 2000 14:20:14 + GMT (21.01.2000, 22:20 +0800 GMT),
Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
MDP> See my reply to tracer. The ticker is just a "silly window" (no
MDP> offence Max/Stef) which provides an access point to the actual virtual
MDP> folder you describe. Why req
Hello all,
on Thu, 20 Jan 2000, at 08:15:32 local time (GMT -0800), Nick wrote:
> Still, I'll see a thread where the first message is the original, as it
> should be, then most, but not all, of the replies are listed in
> descending order with the little + sign next to each one.
the replies to
Hello fellow Bataholics!
I don't know how I configured it
but I have Netscape 4.7 as my default browser and the clickable URLs in TB! work
whether
Netscape is open or closed. It will bring up Netscape if it's closed, and use the
current
window if open.
Just general info: I use Opera AWA IE
Hello TBUDL!
I tried out to configure account groups in order to access
certain user accounts, but now the network/administration menu
has disappeared and I cannot revert my configuration of THE BAT
to default (accessing all accounts without having to log in as a
certain user).
How
Hallo Rob,
On Fri, 21 Jan 2000 15:49:59 +0100 GMT (21.01.2000, 22:49 +0800 GMT),
Rob wrote:
R> i'm using :
R> view - display - all messages
R> view - sort by - creation time
R> view - view threads by - subject
R> works fine. only when someone's PC clock is off, his replies will all be at
R> the
Hello TBUDL,
and thanks y'all who have sent me off-list messages that my template
is wrong. You have seen my latest msg to Marck: it was my mistake.
Sorry again. (No pop-up window "are you really really sure?" came
up.)
A question comes to mind: When you select multiple messages to
forward, and
On Thursday, January 20, 2000 at 09:29:16 ,Nick scribbled:
NA> Is that sort by subject Angel, or view threads by subject? I wonder what
NA> the difference in the two would be?
View / View Threads By / Subject
View / Sort By / Creation Time
These are the two settings I use.
I also have the "Crea
Hi Thomas,
On 21 January 2000 at 22:23:46 GMT +0800 (which was 14:23 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points:
TF> I jsut tried it by randomly sending 7 messages to myself *and
TF> by mistake to the list as well, my apologies to all!, but
TF> my ticker is just a
Hello all,
on Thu, 20 Jan 2000, at 00:07:24 local time (GMT -0800), nurmot wrote:
> Clicking on a URL, or rt. clicking and selecting OPEN THIS LINK, gives
> this error message: "No Application is associated w/ the specified file
> for this application".
sounds like Netscape is not your default
Hello all,
on Fri, 21 Jan 2000, at 00:03:55 local time (GMT -0800), Januk wrote:
> Ah yes, a not so quick search of my archives revealed that the file
> in question is the prefs.js file.
yep ... that one and liprefs.js ; i'd love to have a list of all possible
entries/values for those files !
On Fri, 21 Jan 2000 22:23:46 +0800, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
> I jsut tried it by randomly sending 7 messages to myself *and by
> mistake to the list as well, my apologies to all!, but my
> ticker is just a ticker. I don't have a virtual folder behind it. :-(
:)))
Instead of
On Friday, January 21, 2000, 6:49:59 AM, Rob wrote:
> on Thu, 20 Jan 2000, at 08:15:32 local time (GMT -0800), Nick wrote:
>> Still, I'll see a thread where the first message is the original, as it
>> should be, then most, but not all, of the replies are listed in
>> descending order with the li
Hallo Marck,
On Fri, 21 Jan 2000 15:38:30 + GMT (21.01.2000, 23:38 +0800 GMT),
Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
TF>> I jsut tried it by randomly sending 7 messages to myself *and
TF>> by mistake to the list as well, my apologies to all!, but
TF>> my ticker is just a ticker. I don't hav
On Friday, January 21, 2000, 7:19:52 AM, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
> Have you tried:
> view - sort by - received time
> instead?
Well Thomas, I'm going to give that a try, and see if it alleviates the
problem with having the original message strangely stuck in the middle
of a thread. If it's the o
Hello all,
on Fri, 21 Jan 2000, at 15:49:59 local time (GMT +0100), Rob wrote:
> view - sort by - creation time
oh yeah, and then click the 'creation time' column header so the arrow
points up (ascending ?) ;-)
--
Rob ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] )
using The Bat! 1.39 Beta/1
... Work hard for eight h
Morning Syafril Hermansyah,
> Great, how did you know that, by trial ?
No. I just read every single mail here. It was discussed before, this was
mentioned.
--
+--Jast
|on Windows 98 4.10 Build A
:with The Bat! 1.39
--
---
On Thursday, January 20, 2000, 8:01:43 AM, Steve Lamb wrote:
> Thursday, January 20, 2000, 7:54:19 AM, Nick wrote:
>> I'm just curious, but what purpose would be served by trying to run
>> Xnews with Hamster? What added functionality would it serve that is not
>> already present in Xnews?
>
Hi,
On Friday, January 21, 2000, 3:29:12 PM, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
> off-list reply is Ctrl-F4. It works every time. Get used to it and
> avoid embarrassing stains - I mean - incidents. ;-)
Careful with your suggestions. This doesn't work when somebody, such
as me, has '%TO=""%TO="TBUDL <[
Friday, January 21, 2000, 16:08, Christian Weiss wrote:
> I tried out to configure account groups in order to access
> certain user accounts, but now the network/administration menu
> has disappeared and I cannot revert my configuration of THE BAT to
> default (accessing all accounts
On Fri, 21 Jan 2000 08:30:16 -0800, Nick Andriash wrote:
>> Wild guess, Hamster is a local news server. XNews doesn't have true
>> offline reading capabilities so it needs a local news server to do that.
> I was thinking more about this Steve, and remembered that Xnews has a
> storage featu
Hallo Allie,
On Fri, 21 Jan 2000 11:17:50 -0500 GMT (22.01.2000, 00:17 +0800 GMT),
Allie Martin wrote:
AM> Instead of sending yourself messages and tying up your mail server
AM> among other mishaps, you may generate some unread messages by going
AM> through a few folders, selecting a couple
Hi Thomas,
On 21 January 2000 at 23:56:50 GMT +0800 (which was 15:56 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points:
TF> I tried again and failed. :-(. When I double-click on the ticker,
TF> one message will be shown as View Folder (full screen). With all
TF> headers ("kludges")
Hello Marck D. Pearlstone,
On Fri, 21 Jan 2000 14:29:12 + GMT your local time,
which was Friday, January 21, 2000, 9:29:12 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
Marck> So - this line's a DEAD HORSE folks.
Just one question, how many dead horses have been generated so far???
Hello Thomas Fernandez,
On Fri, 21 Jan 2000 22:23:46 +0800 GMT your local time,
which was Friday, January 21, 2000, 9:23:46 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Thomas Fernandez wrote:
Thomas> I jsut tried it by randomly sending 7 messages to myself *and by
Thomas> mistake to the list as well, my ap
Hello Angel,
On Fri, 21 Jan 2000 06:49:55 -0800 GMT your local time,
which was Friday, January 21, 2000, 9:49:55 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Angel wrote:
Angel> Hello fellow Bataholics!
Angel> I don't know how I configured it
Angel> but I have Netscape 4.7 as my default browser and the clic
Friday, January 21, 2000, 7:56:50 AM, Thomas wrote:
> Do I have to configure the ticker somewhere?
No, turn on message list in the view folder (remember, it isn't view
message) window.
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
ICQ: 5107343
Friday, January 21, 2000, 5:14:17 AM, Syafril wrote:
> This is very important to filter "bcc:".
How? :)
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
ICQ: 5107343 | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
-
Friday, January 21, 2000, 2:56:11 AM, Allie wrote:
> trimmed) is far more than what I have written and if I'm sure that I still
> want to send? Now tell me
In Gravity (IIRC) there is an option to set a threshold on that warning.
IE, messages under x lines don't get checked on the quote r
Friday, January 21, 2000, 12:58:19 AM, tracer wrote:
> To me it seems to be a bug if replying to a msg DOESNT reset the
> incoming msg as read.,..
I don't. Who says I read it? Sounds dumb, but it is true in some cases.
For example, reply, "Hi, I'm busy, will get to this later..."
--
Thursday, January 20, 2000, 7:51:44 PM, Thomas wrote:
> There was also a discussion about an adiitional flag, "seen" (as
> opposed ot new or read), with which messages could be marked that need
> relpies. I haven't heard whether this will be available in v2, but
> think not.
This is done some
Friday, January 21, 2000, 8:30:16 AM, Nick wrote:
> I was thinking more about this Steve, and remembered that Xnews has a
> storage feature. Would not storing of bodies serve the same purpose as
> running Hamster with Xnews? Are they not one in the same, only using
> different Folders basically?
Hi Tom,
TP> In this vein, can anyone tell me where the startup sequence for the
TP> webbrowser is stored so I can have it call IE differently?
in windows explorer: View | folder options | HTML Document
--
Regards,
Wolfgang
Co-moderator TBUDL / TBBETA discussion lists
Using The Bat! 1.38e und
Hallo Juergen Frisch!
>But what about trying to create a new
>account, which is the old in fact?
As I have no administrator rights any more, I cannot create any
new accounts with THE BAT!
--
regards
-cw-
<===>
Christian Weiss . lo
Friday, January 21, 2000, 10:03:52 AM, Marck wrote:
> Replies on *this* list are usually to the individual making the original
> posting.
Other lists are different?
> The TB name munging, although repugnant to some, works perfectly to promote
> very sensible and legible conversation.
No
Hi Markus,
On 21 January 2000 at 18:01:39 GMT +0100 (which was 17:01 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points:
>> off-list reply is Ctrl-F4. It works every time. Get used to it and
>> avoid embarrassing stains - I mean - incidents. ;-)
MG> Careful with your suggestions. Th
Hi tracer,
On 21 January 2000 at 00:10:34 GMT +0700 (which was 17:10 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points:
Marck>> So - this line's a DEAD HORSE folks.
t> Just one question, how many dead horses have been generated so
t> far??? have you ever counted them ???
Just doin
On Friday, January 21, 2000, 8:44:59 AM, Allie Martin wrote:
> Yes, but I can't seem to get at these stored messages without first
> going online and opening the group with the connection going. You could
> however disconnect after having opened the group and continue reading
> offline.
I ha
Hi Steve,
On 21 January 2000 at 10:14:07 GMT -0800 (which was 18:14 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points:
I really didn't want to get into this. :-(
>> Replies on *this* list are usually to the individual making the
>> original posting.
SL> Other lists are di
Hi there!
On 21 Jan 00, at 0:03, Januk Aggarwal wrote
about "Re: Web hyperlinks don't work":
> > Although I don't use IE primarily and use Opera 95% of the time ( I
> > more enjoy the shell enhancements such as the quick launch bar and the
> > start menu enhancements) I decided to look a
On Fri, 21 Jan 2000 09:21:53 -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
> Also who said colors are for news. Personally I find black on white
> blinding. I am upset at Windows for tying certain color values together
> which force people to use a dark on light color scheme than a light on
> dark. Configuring
On Fri, 21 Jan 2000 11:29:47 -0800, Nick Andriash wrote:
> I have my storage options set to zero seeing as I've got cable, and am
> always on-line. However, if you store articles with Xnews, it doesn't
> make sense to have to quickly go on-line to retrieve them... should they
> not be "stored" as
>> That seems too configurable and easy to be from a MS product...
AM> To all those who didn't look for the option assuming that in MS
AM> Windows tradition it would not be there, call a spade a spade will ya?
AM> :)))
Doesn't appear to be there in IE4.
Regarding "the browser should fix
TP>> In this vein, can anyone tell me where the startup sequence for the
TP>> webbrowser is stored so I can have it call IE differently?
WK> in windows explorer: View | folder options | HTML Document
That's so beautiful it makes me want to cry. Now the problem is those
damned forsaken Windows "
Friday, January 21, 2000, 11:55:25 AM, Marck wrote:
SL>> Other lists are different?
> What, all lists are the same?
Asside from announce-only lists where there are no replies can you think
of a list where replies aren't made to individuals? :)
> Not from my POV, however. My name is "Ma
On Friday, January 21, 2000 at 07:19:52 ,Thomas scribbled:
TF> Have you tried:
TF> view - sort by - received time
TF> instead?
The only reason I have it sort by creation time is because when I tried it by Received
time, for
some reason the emails in the thread seem to jump all over the place as
\\\|///
/ ~ _ \
(- O o -)
--oOOo-(_)-oOOo---
Hello Christian,
CW> As I have no administrator rights any more, I cannot create any
CW> new accounts with THE BAT!
have you tried all your accounts
TP>> I have four words I could say to that, but I won't.
DH> he failed to take my comment to heart and reacted stupidly.
DH> The four words he refers to are obviously offensive ones.
"obviously" to some perhaps. To me, inappropriate to the list but not
necessarily offensive. Reacting stupidly?
On Friday, January 21, 2000 at 12:33:29 , I scribbled and *need an eraser* :
A> It takes some servers forever to receive things,
Make that "Receive/Deliver"
Sorry 'bout that :D
Regards,
~~~Angel ...your RDR
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
"No hay extraños en este mundo, simplemente amigos
On Friday, January 21, 2000 at 08:22:40 ,Rob scribbled:
R> oh yeah, and then click the 'creation time' column header so the arrow
R> points up (ascending ?) ;-)
I have mine pointing down, so that the most recent message is displayed first :D That
way
when I open the thread, all the recent messag
>> It also seems to me that software should assimilate and be responsive
>> to the needs of its users - not vice versa.
J> True, but it's hard for software itself to do so. Sure, you can make it
J> super-customizable, but that will always mean work for the user to customize
J> it.
How
Hello Roel!
> have you tried all your accounts to log-in to tb! ?
> so there still should be 1 account with admin-rights.
That solved it!
Thanks a lot!!!
--
regards,
-cw-
<===>
Christian Weiss . logisch - so macht Internet Sinn.
A-1230 Wie
TF> I tried it again, and: the Dispatcher no longer deletes! I know it
TF> worked in an earlier version, but today it definitely did not.
TF> Furthermore, my killfilter didn't kill this message to
TF> [EMAIL PROTECTED] - it used to.
Works here on my installation, see headers for version.
-tom!
\\\|///
/ ~ _ \
(- O o -)
--oOOo-(_)-oOOo---
Hello Steve,
SL> Asside from announce-only lists where there are no replies can you
SL> think of a list where replies aren't made to individuals? :)
\\\|///
/ ~ _ \
(- O o -)
--oOOo-(_)-oOOo---
Hello Tom,
TP> That's so beautiful it makes me want to cry. Now the problem is
TP> those damned forsaken Windows "hidden types" or whatever... You
TP>
Hi Tom,
On 21 January 2000 at 12:12:38 GMT -0800 (which was 20:12 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points:
TP> a doc type is registered, but doesn't show up there? *
TP> Windows.
Ahem! There is a language constraint on this list, Please be more
careful in
Hello Steve & all fellow TBUDL members,
Friday, January 21, 2000, 2:16:00 PM, Steve wrote in response to
Marck's saying:
>> What, all lists are the same?
After Steve said:
SL>>> Other lists are different?
I just tried replying with TB to 6 lists related to my work (which is
not computer rela
Hi there!
On 21 Jan 00, at 15:49, Douglas Hinds wrote
about "Re[2]: Ctrl-F4":
> SL> That technical requirement doesn't exist in email. I am
> SL> [EMAIL PROTECTED] That is all that is needed to route mail to
> SL> me. The name in front is a comment, nothing more. However, having
> SL> a comm
SL>> No. My bone is with TB! doing something it should not be doing,
SL>> period. If I set my reply-to to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I don't
SL>> want people sending mail to "Steve Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>".
I finally got it. Perhaps The Bat! only prepends the name when there
is no non-email-address name
Hello all,
on Thu, 20 Jan 2000, at 00:07:24 local time (GMT -0800), nurmot wrote:
> "No Application is associated w/the specified file for this application".
try putting this line in prefs.js and liprefs.js :
user_pref("browser.wfe.ignore_def_check", false);
make sure it's in the right place,
On Fri, 21 Jan 2000 17:18:05 -0600, Douglas Hinds wrote:
[..snip..]
> That bugs must be fixed is a truism. If it's a bug, it must be fixed
> or squashed, let live, industrialized or released in a field (if a
> predator, pathogen or parasite of a pest). But it sounds like a design
> choice though
On Sat, 22 Jan 2000 01:27:58 +0300, Alexander V. Kiselev wrote:
[..snip..]
> 2. As Steve has already pointed out, the addresses like
> "Alexander V. Kiselev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> get filled into the MRU list, where from TB gets them for autocompletion. This
> *is* a _severe_ bug, regardless o
Hello Alexander & all fellow TBUDL members,
Friday, January 21, 2000, 4:27:58 PM, Alexander wrote in response to
my saying:
>> Interesting logic. I wonder how many other TUBDL subscribers share
>> that concern.
When Steve said:
>> SL> That technical requirement doesn't exist in email. I am
>
1 - 100 of 133 matches
Mail list logo
