Allister Jenks, [AJ] wrote:
AJ Excellent! However, some questions.
AJ 1) Is it ready for prime time? ie. stable?
For prerelease software, this is unpredictable. Some of us may have
problems while others don't. In fact, this remains the case even after
release though the problems should be
On Monday, September 01, 2003, Deborah W wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
DW If I download install v2 decide to go back to 1.62r, can I? Or
DW will I need to re-install 1.62 from scratch?
Deborah,
The file structure is different, and you would not be able to use the
1.62 program with files
A Bat-fellow, Allister Jenks,
wrote on Tuesday, 2nd September 2003 at 10:10:43 (GMT +1200),
which was 0:10 a.m. in Bratislava --
AJ 1) Is it ready for prime time? ie. stable?
I have had no time to participate in Beta cycles after 1.61. However,
when version 2.0 Final came out earlier this
This is off-topic, but it might be of interest to others, here, too.
It looks as though someone who had my e-mail address in their WAB (or
wherever Sobig looks for addresses) was infected with the worm.
Infected e-mails have been going out under my mailing list e-mail
address, mostly from one
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday, September 01, 2003, Jonathan Angliss wrote...
If you are getting any bounce messages, you might want to examine the
headers
I should have said headers of any attached mails. Having the headers
of the bounce message is pretty useless.
-
Hello Avenarius,
oenhanced Search, it seems (though I can't seem to be able to
find the 1.xx option to search in All Accounts or only in Current
Account)
Right mouse click 'Select all' or 'Cntl+A'.
--
Best regards,
Greg Strong
Using The Bat! v2.00 on Windows XP 5.1
Hello Joseph,
The file structure is different, and you would not be able to use the
1.62 program with files that were adapted by the 2.0 program.
Not totally correct for Pop accounts. The folder structure has changed.
I have specifically asked this question to Stefan in the past with
regard to
I'm confused now about upgrades and TB versions-- just registered
v1.62 on August 27. I was initially unaware they were asking another
50% for upgrade on Sept 1; by the time I caught on, my trial period
was over and I had to register to access my mail. Anyway like an idiot
I just downloaded
On Mon 1 September 2003, 23:10:04 +1000, Pixie wrote:
RA Looks similar to the problem discussed in the thread starting at
RA http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg58912.html. I
RA logged it as a bug, hopefully it not be in V2!
My last message in Address book / Autocomplete bug
Hello P.Johnson,
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003 23:02:46 -0500 GMT (02/09/2003, 11:02 +0700 GMT),
P.Johnson wrote:
So, can I go back to my previously registered 1.62 now that 2.0 has
installed overtop?
Yes, just install 1.62 overtop. As long as you haven't moved/created
any accounts or folders while
Hello Avenarius,
On Tue, 02 Sep 2003 02:33:44 +0200 GMT (02/09/2003, 07:33 +0700 GMT),
Avenarius wrote:
However, the few hours that I've been using version 2 have convinced
me that v2 is worth paying the price for upgrade. There are lots of
cosmetic improvements and bug-fixes in version 2
Hello P.Johnson,
On Tuesday, September 2, 2003, 2:02:46 PM, Pat wrote:
Any ideas or suggestions would be very much appreciated.
A Frustrated Canadian in Houston
I'm frustrated in a different kind of way. Installing v.2 over my
trial version of v.1.62 gave me what I wanted, a trial version of
Gordon,
GW My first sight of v.2 confirmed that I want to pay, but neither the
GW Register link nor the WWW home page link under the Help menu do any
GW good -- just a 404 not found error. Trying the web address in the help
GW file http://www.ritlabs.com/the_bat/ produced a Forbidden error!
Try
Hello all,
Is it possible to convert 1.x student licence to 2.0 private one ? Can I
just choose The Bat! Ver.2.xx.xxx private UPGRADE from The Bat! Ver.1.xx
from the Buy online -page ?
BR, Tero
Current version is 2.00 | Using TBUDL
Dear TB users,
I recently installed RedHat Linux on my machine and I wanna know if
TB! can work there. If not, is there any plan for approaching this?
Thanks. :)
--
Best regards,
Joe Lee
A fan of The Bat! in domain name industry
Hello
I went to www.ritlabs.com and tried to download version 2 trial and
well it appears to be mucking up. Hopefully ritlabs will fix this
shortly.
--
Best regards,
rick
Current version is 2.00 | Using TBUDL
Hello rick,
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, at 02:38:08 [GMT -0400] (which was 07:38 in my
TimeZone) you wrote:
r Hello
r I went to www.ritlabs.com and tried to download version 2 trial and
r well it appears to be mucking up. Hopefully ritlabs will fix this
r shortly.
So am I. I guess it is
Hello rick,
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, at 02:38:08 [GMT -0400] (which was 07:38 in my
TimeZone) you wrote:
r Hello
r I went to www.ritlabs.com and tried to download version 2 trial and
r well it appears to be mucking up. Hopefully ritlabs will fix this
r shortly.
Cant even get thru to
Hello Avenarius,
Tuesday, September 2, 2003, 2:33:44 AM, you wrote:
A However, the few hours that I've been using version 2 have convinced
A me that v2 is worth paying the price for upgrade. There are lots of
A cosmetic improvements and bug-fixes in version 2 compared to 1.61 that
A I wouldn't
On Tuesday, September 2, 2003, 4:38:08 PM, rick wrote:
I went to www.ritlabs.com and tried to download version 2 trial and
well it appears to be mucking up. Hopefully ritlabs will fix this
shortly.
Yes, I thought the one now listed might correct errors in the earlier
one I downloaded
On Tuesday, September 2, 2003, 8:38:15, Joe Lee wrote:
I recently installed RedHat Linux on my machine and I wanna know if
TB! can work there. If not, is there any plan for approaching this?
When I was testing it with Wine it behaved pretty nicely...
--
Jernej Simoncic, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I sent the following to The Bat! developers a week ago. I never
received a response. Can anyone tell me who the best person is to
contact to get an answer? E-mail address?
Thanks
--
Craig Westerman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
This is a forwarded message
From: Craig
On Tuesday, September 2, 2003, 10:04:14 AM, FJ de Bruin wrote:
FdB Can you (or someone else) confirm that Bayesian filtering made it into
FdB the final 2.0 version?
FdB I tried to look for this info on the ritlabs site but I could not find
FdB any reference.
Ritlabs gives a link to this
On Tuesday, 2 September 2003, at 7:04:14 p.m., FJ de Bruin wrote:
Can you (or someone else) confirm that Bayesian filtering made it into
the final 2.0 version?
Having just taken the plunge and upgraded, I can give you the
following text from the help topic About Spam...
The Bat! offers an
TheBat-users,
Since installing 2.0 (coming from 1.63 beta) TB has definitely slowed
down. Moving from one folder/account to another takes noticeably longer
than it did with 1.63. I _have_ purged/compressed, etc.
The same with filter processing and communication with the POP3
mailbox.
Has
Hello P.Johnson,
Tuesday, September 2, 2003, 5:02:46 AM, you wrote:
PJ So, can I go back to my previously registered 1.62 now that 2.0 has
PJ installed overtop? Will I have to pay after 30 days to access my mail
PJ again? I'm sorry but can't help resenting the cost of an upgrade after
PJ such
Just saw this list of URLs for German speaking Bat fans:
http://www.8ung.at/thebatinfo/
http://www.guenther-eisele.de/bat/faq.htm
http://forum.aidforce-one.de/
http://www.batworld.de/
http://www.hasiversum.de/de/tippstricks/thebat/inhalt.htm
http://www.godwana.de/thebat/
Allister Jenks wrote:
Having just taken the plunge and upgraded, I can give you the
following text from the help topic About Spam...
Does this mean the Help file has been revised? This is a badly needed
improvement. Is it any good?
--
Paul Richardson
Using The Bat! v1.62r on Windows 2000 5.0
Craig Westerman wrote:
I sent the following to The Bat! developers a week ago. I never
received a response. Can anyone tell me who the best person is to
contact to get an answer? E-mail address?
I purchased 1.62 on 2/8/03 and was told then that upgrading to version
2 will be free.
Hallo Fledermäuse,
I just installed the new v2 and not much has changed on the first look. But oh well,
since I was using the latest beta before, that is not much of a surprise. I read
somewhere on the lists that the v2.0 is just the final release of the 1.63 betas,
right? Which reminds me, I
Monday, September 1, 2003, 6:29:47 PM,Vishal wrote:
V I know, I know, this has been discussed before. But has ANYONE managed to get TB
V to do automatic mail checks with Zonealarm Pro installed? I'd rather not shift
V to Kerio yet as ZA is otherwise an excellent firewall. ZA does not appear to be
Tuesday, September 2, 2003, Gordon Woolf wrote:
Incidentally, can anyone tell me that the new fourth button in the
title bar does. It opens a find dialog but typing in a phrase and
hitting find doesn't seem to find anything, and I've no idea what
the rest of the dialog is supposed to do.
Hello, people at tbudl-list!
I have set my accounts to delete all the unneeded mail to common
Trash folder instead of local Trash (Account - Properties - Mail
Management - Advanced - Deletion: 'Move to the specified folder' and
'Use alternative deletion method when purging').
Now I want to
Hi Mary,
Can you check what you are using as attachment coding under Account |
properties | files Directories | Attachements
It should be set to Mime.
--
Best regards,
Gerard
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Golf is an easy game... it's just hard to
Hi FJ,
Tuesday, September 2, 2003, 9:29:05 PM, you wrote:
FdB Thanks for this information, guess I will have to be patient for the
FdB ritlabs site to come back online.
It is up and operational, I have just been there and downloaded v.2.
Regards
Robyn
It seems that FJ de Bruin said ...
F Thanks for this information, guess I will have to be patient for the
F ritlabs site to come back online.
It's back now. I gave the site my credit card information last night
and this morning I'm fully registered.
The 30-day-trial counter re-set itself to 30
Hi,
I've registered and upgrade to v2 (although it looks like I've been
sent an Educational license) but can't download it. The following
link from the Ritlabs website isn't working:
http://download2.ritlabs.com/download/the_bat/the_bat.exe
I've also tried downloading it from www.thebat.co.uk
Hello Alan Jarvis,
Alan Jarvis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tuesday, September 2, 2003 at 11:30:39 AM
AJ Hi,
AJ I've registered and upgrade to v2 (although it looks like I've been
AJ sent an Educational license) but can't download it. The following
AJ link from the Ritlabs website isn't working:
Hi,
AJ I've registered and upgrade to v2 (although it looks like I've been
AJ sent an Educational license) but can't download it.
Funny, me too. Maybe there is something wrong with their automatic key
generation.
AJ The following link from the Ritlabs website isn't working:
AJ
Hi Allister,
Tuesday, September 2, 2003, 5:49:23 PM, you wrote:
AJ In order to use Anti spam support firstly you have to install
AJ anti-spam plug-in with self learning facilities. To install a plug-in,
AJ open Preferences dialog from the Options | Preferences menu and in the
AJ preferences tree
Hallo Fledermäuse,
are the new icons hardcoded into the program, or is there a file somewhere, to make
some small adjustments (in general I like them).
--
regards,
Jurgen
Using The Bat! v2.00 on WinXP.5.1.2600.SP1
Current version is 2.00 |
On Tue, 02 Sep 2003 12:12:56 +1000 GMT, Robin Anson wrote:
RA that if autocompletion failed, using Ctrl+Minus might still complete
RA the address.
You were lucky I guess. The CTL +/- wasn't working for me either.
-- Pixie
Using The Bat! v1.62r on Windows 95 4.0
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have not found posted the Amnesty policy for newly registered 1.x
uses to obtain a new key for Ver. 2.x
Can some one clarify this for me?
Thanks.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP SDK 3.0.2
Hello all,
Tuesday, September 2, 2003, Jurgen Haug wrote:
are the new icons hardcoded into the program, or is there a file
somewhere, to make some small adjustments (in general I like them).
yes, they are hardcoded. You can download them from following
location, edit and store to Home
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
G'day Jurgen,
On Tue, 02 Sep 2003, at 14:13:47 [GMT +0200] (22:13 here) you wrote:
JH Hallo Fledermäuse,
JH are the new icons hardcoded into the program, or is there a
JH file somewhere, to make some small adjustments (in general I like
JH them).
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
G'day Jurgen,
On Tue, 02 Sep 2003, at 14:13:47 [GMT +0200] (22:13 here) you wrote:
JH Hallo Fledermäuse,
JH are the new icons hardcoded into the program, or is there a
JH file somewhere, to make some small adjustments (in general I like
JH them).
Tuesday, September 2, 2003, 1:01:27 PM, you wrote:
AJ I've registered and upgrade to v2 (although it looks like I've been
AJ sent an Educational license) but can't download it.
Funny, me too. Maybe there is something wrong with their automatic key
generation.
I'll give it a few days to let
In my address book, I have separate address book entries for each of
the TB mailinglists, all of which I'm subscribed to. I have them all
placed in a group and have defined a group template. The idea is that
my compose/reply/forward template will be shared amongst them.
Generally,
Hello Vishal,
Monday, September 1, 2003, 12:29:47 PM, you wrote:
V Hi,
V I know, I know, this has been discussed before. But has ANYONE managed to get TB
V to do automatic mail checks with Zonealarm Pro installed? I'd rather not shift
V to Kerio yet as ZA is otherwise an excellent firewall. ZA
Tuesday, September 2, 2003, 8:01:27 AM, you wrote:
CR Hi,
AJ I've registered and upgrade to v2 (although it looks like I've been
AJ sent an Educational license) but can't download it.
CR Funny, me too. Maybe there is something wrong with their automatic key
CR generation.
May be something
Tuesday, September 2, 2003, 1:31:42 PM, you wrote:
AJ I've registered and upgrade to v2 (although it looks like I've been
AJ sent an Educational license) but can't download it.
CR Funny, me too. Maybe there is something wrong with their automatic key
CR generation.
May be something wrong,
Hello FJ,
Tuesday, September 2, 2003, 2:04:14 AM, you wrote:
FdB Can you (or someone else) confirm that Bayesian filtering made it into
FdB the final 2.0 version?
FdB I tried to look for this info on the ritlabs site but I could not find
FdB any reference.
Work continues on the Bayesian plug
AJ Tuesday, September 2, 2003, 1:31:42 PM, you wrote:
AJ I've registered and upgrade to v2 (although it looks like I've been
AJ sent an Educational license) but can't download it.
CR Funny, me too. Maybe there is something wrong with their automatic key
CR generation.
May be something
Hello all,
Tuesday, September 2, 2003, Alan Jarvis wrote:
Hi,
I've registered and upgrade to v2 (although it looks like I've been
sent an Educational license) but can't download it. The following
link from the Ritlabs website isn't working:
Tuesday, September 2, 2003, 9:08:41 AM,Peter wrote:
PF I am a bit disappointed with the features in 2.0. Like someone
PF else said, if you don't use IMAP and PGP (which, I guess, most people
PF don't), there is not anything real new.
Don't forget that v2 has HTML support which 1.x didn't
Hi danger,
dh I have not found posted the Amnesty policy for newly registered 1.x
dh uses to obtain a new key for Ver. 2.x
I am also interested in this. I registered on 27 August. I sent an
email to ritlabs last night, and am awaiting a response. I'm sure they
have many emails to go through this
== Reply to your email of Tuesday, September 2, 2003, 10:37:33 PM ==
FdB Can you (or someone else) confirm that Bayesian filtering made it into
FdB the final 2.0 version?
Work continues on the Bayesian plug in. It is not included, though.
You do have to go out and get it separately. Also
Hi Pixie
Saturday, August 30, 2003, 8:54:55 AM, you wrote:
P When TB starts and message auto-view = ON, default to preview of no
P message. Or perhaps if it's ON by default, turn it OFF on initial
P startup until a message is specifically selected.
I disagree. I think it increases the work
Hi all,
If I upgrade to version 2 and utilize the Bayesian plug-in, will I
also be able to use TLS? And, am I correct in assuming that until Eset
comes up with a NOD32 version 2 plug-in for TB version 2, IMON won't
work with TLS?
--
Regards,
Terry
Using The Bat! v1.62r on Windows 2000 5.0
Hi Vishal,
@1-Sep-2003, 13:29 -0400 (18:29 UK time) Vishal [V] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
V I know, I know, this has been discussed before. But has ANYONE
V managed to get TB to do automatic mail checks with Zonealarm Pro
V installed?
Yes.
Many have.
A *significantly* larger proportion
Hello all,
Tuesday, September 2, 2003, Peter Fjelsten wrote:
I must say that although I have been through all the betas (more or
less) I am a bit disappointed with the features in 2.0. Like someone
else said, if you don't use IMAP and PGP (which, I guess, most people
don't), there is not
Hallo Fledermäuse,
since the Ritlabs homepage changed to v2, it looks really professional. I guess
professional also means NO to cute little bats with mailman caps? Does anyone know who
painted that little piece of art, and if there's more graphics with the mascot of my
favorite mail program
Since I turned on the MS indexing service in my Win XP Pro computer,
the O/S seems to keep changing the file association of .eml files.
Every time I load TB!, it asks me if I want to associate that format
with TB! (which I do). Is there any way to modify the indexing
service so that it does not
Does the release version of 2.0 have the capacity to import more than
one field of e-mail addresses? Up through the Beta versions, one could
import only one e-mail field from other file formats into the AB.
Second e-mail addresses had to go to Notes or some other field. This
was a big deficiency
Note:
In the following email-header, I'm using a Yahoo-Mail From address (my
Yahoo POP3/SMTP address--paid service) to send (with The Bat! v2.00 ) a message
to my runbox.com (web email) inbox (which uses SpamAssassin).
From the (received) email header (see X-Spam-Status,) it looks like
Hello tbudl,
Does anyone know if there is a grandfather policy for TB 2.0? I just
purchased a license for 1.62 a short time ago.
--
Peace!
Wayne Howard
Another world is indeed possible!
www.natcap.org
Current version is 2.00 | Using TBUDL
Hello Randy,
Tuesday, September 2, 2003, 4:53:25 PM, you wrote:
Note:
In the following email-header, I'm using a Yahoo-Mail From address (my
Yahoo POP3/SMTP address--paid service) to send (with The Bat! v2.00 ) a message
to my runbox.com (web email) inbox (which uses SpamAssassin).
On Tuesday, September 02, 2003, Anne wrote...
Don't forget that v2 has HTML support which 1.x didn't have ;-) oh
and the Scheduler!
And the plugins :)
--
Jonathan Angliss
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Adolescence - the time between puberty and adultery.
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi all,
Sorry again, but please verify my sig?
Best regards,
Dave Wilson.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(E-mail me subject: 'public key' and I will send it to you)
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Current version is 2.00 | Using TBUDL
Hi Daveiw,
@2-Sep-2003, 16:43 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [D] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to TBUDL:
D Sorry again, but please verify my sig?
D Best regards,
D Dave Wilson. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Good - nice PGP/MIME sig.
--
Cheers -- .\\arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator
TB! v2.00 on Windows XP
On Tuesday, September 02, 2003, Jurgen Haug wrote...
I just installed the new v2 and not much has changed on the first
look.
Depends where you look...
- HTML Support
- Anti-Spam Plugins
- IMAP Support
- PGP/MIME Support
Just a few things.
btw, is talking about the v2 release on
Tuesday, September 2, 2003, Allen wrote:
May be something wrong, indeed -- as I have yet to receive my
upgraded key some 15 hours after registering. How long did it take
for you guys?
I'm in the same situation you are.
--
Urban
Manhattan Island was bought from the Indians for
Tuesday, September 2, 2003, Allen wrote:
May be something wrong, indeed -- as I have yet to receive my
upgraded key some 15 hours after registering. How long did it take
for you guys?
Update to my previous message.
It was a mistake on my side, the reg message had found its way to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
dcn Sorry again, but please verify my sig?
Verified OK using key on keyserver.pgp.com
- --
Stuart
Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/11 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1
PGP Key available from ldap://keyserver.pgp.com
... The biggest problem with
Hello Allen,
Tuesday, September 2, 2003, 2:31:42 PM, you wrote:
A May be something wrong, indeed -- as I have yet to receive my
A upgraded key some 15 hours after registering. How long did it take
A for you guys?
A few minutes (10 or 15).
--
Best regards,
Jos
A May be something wrong, indeed -- as I have yet to receive my
A upgraded key some 15 hours after registering. How long did it take
A for you guys?
A few minutes (10 or 15).
After my online registration, they're using The Element 5 site now for that,
I got in a 'thank you'
Hello Allen,
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003 08:25:20 -0400 GMT (02/09/2003, 19:25 +0700 GMT),
Allen wrote:
Generally, this does work -- but with one problem. When I attempt to
reply to a message in the TBUDL discussion group, it uses my default
account template rather than my TB template.
The
Hello TBUDL
Has anybody upgrade from 1.x academic to 2.0 full. There doesn't seem to
be that option.
--
Regards
William
http://www.residues.info and http://www.magiric.com
Flying with The Bat! www.ritlabs.com/the_bat
Windows 2000 Pro 2195 Service Pack 4
Hello Vishal,
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003 09:55:59 -0400 GMT (01/09/2003, 20:55 +0700 GMT),
Vishal wrote:
2. If not TN, is there any way I can get The Group as my quote prefix just for
this one group?
I have a weird feeling I replied to this in the morning. Either you
posted the same question on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tuesday, September 02, 2003
12:51:39 PM (GMT -05:00)
RE: verify please?
Greetings daveiw,
On Tuesday, September 2, 2003, 11:43:16 AM, you wrote:
daveiw Sorry again, but please verify my sig?
Verified here, imported, signed and updated.
- --
Hi William
On 2 Sep 2003 17:33:27 (my local time 18:33:27), William Moore wrote:
WM Has anybody upgrade from 1.x academic to 2.0 full. There doesn't seem to
WM be that option.
I've upgraded from educational to personal without problems...
Just order the upgrade version you want and it'll be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tuesday, September 02, 2003
12:56:49 PM (GMT -05:00)
RE: Upgrade to 2.0
Greetings Wayne,
On Tuesday, September 2, 2003, 11:18:52 AM, you wrote:
Wayne Does anyone know if there is a grandfather policy for TB 2.0? I just
Wayne purchased a license for
Hello Roel,
On Sep 2, 2003, 18:53 +0200 GMT (11:53 AM CST) you [R] typed:
R On 2 Sep 2003 17:33:27 (my local time 18:33:27), William Moore wrote:
WM Has anybody upgrade from 1.x academic to 2.0 full. There doesn't seem to
WM be that option.
R I've upgraded from educational to personal without
What are the message.att file attachment appear on all The Bat! v2.0
users e-mails?
--
Using The Bat! v1.62r on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1
Current version is 2.00 | Using TBUDL information:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tuesday, September 02, 2003
1:24:19 PM (GMT -05:00)
RE: Can TB works in Linux OS?
Greetings Joe,
On Tuesday, September 2, 2003, 2:38:15 AM, you wrote:
Joe I recently installed RedHat Linux on my machine and I wanna know if
Joe TB! can work there.
Hello Gunivortus,
Tuesday, September 2, 2003, 6:32:00 PM, you wrote:
GG After my online registration, they're using The Element 5 site now for that,
GG I got in a 'thank you' message the note:
GG The publisher will send the license key by e-mail within 48 hours.
GG That would make 15 hours
Hello William,
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, at 17:33:27 [GMT +0100] (which was 17:33 in my
TimeZone) you wrote:
WM Hello TBUDL
WM Has anybody upgrade from 1.x academic to 2.0 full. There doesn't seem to
WM be that option.
I did the version update 1x to 2, and now I have a Educational
Licence Any
Hello Mark,
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003 13:18:46 -0400 GMT (03/09/2003, 00:18 +0700 GMT),
Mark wrote:
What are the message.att file attachment appear on all The Bat! v2.0
users e-mails?
Often they are PGP/MIME signatures, which you can only fully
appreciate if you use TB 2.0.
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Hello daveiw,
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, at 16:43:16 [GMT +0100] (which was 16:43 in my
TimeZone) you wrote:
dcn Hi all,
dcn Sorry again, but please verify my sig?
Works fine here.
--
Best regards,
Michael
http://www.thompsonmike.co.uk/
PGP KeyID := 0xA9547E32
STUPIDITY is NOT a HANDICAP!
Hello MikeD,
Tuesday, September 2, 2003, 2:37:33 PM, you wrote:
M3 Work continues on the Bayesian plug in. It is not included, though.
M3 You do have to go out and get it separately.
Could you give me a pointer to where to get this plug-in? I tried to
google but everytime, I end up at programs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Marek,
In a message with mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2 Sep 2003 15:35:07 , you typed:
MM (completely new filtering system, customizable interface etc.). Many
What do you mean by customizable interface. Please, oh please don't
say you mean skins,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tuesday, September 02, 2003
2:00:36 PM (GMT -05:00)
RE: zonealarm and automatic mail checks - works for anyone?
Greetings Vishal,
On Monday, September 1, 2003, 1:29:47 PM, you wrote:
Vishal I know, I know, this has been discussed before. But
Vishal
Hello Robert,
Tuesday, September 2, 2003, 3:29:45 AM, you wrote:
RG On Tuesday, September 2, 2003, 10:04:14 AM, FJ de Bruin wrote:
FdB Can you (or someone else) confirm that Bayesian filtering made it into
FdB the final 2.0 version?
FdB I tried to look for this info on the ritlabs site but I
Hello all,
Tuesday, September 2, 2003, Krister Ekstrom wrote:
MM (completely new filtering system, customizable interface etc.). Many
What do you mean by customizable interface. Please, oh please don't
say you mean skins, cause if you do, i would like to be informed of
another MUA, cause
When new address books or folders are created how do I change the order of appearance
in the address
book itself...Some of them are in Alphabetical order and some are not as well as some
of
the original default folders are different colors...
Thanks, BOB
--
Best regards,
Bob
Tuesday, September 2, 2003, 3:10:27 PM, Bob wrote:
B When new address books or folders are created how do I change
B the order of appearance in the address book itself...Some of
B them are in Alphabetical order and some are not as well as
B some of the original default folders are different
B
Hello Bob,
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003 12:10:27 -0700 GMT (03/09/2003, 02:10 +0700 GMT),
Bob Brunson wrote:
When new address books or folders are created how do I change the
order of appearance in the address book itself...Some of them are in
Alphabetical order and some are not as well as some of the
Hello Roel
Thank you for your email dated Tuesday, September 2, 2003, 5:53:57 PM,
in which you wrote:
R I've upgraded from educational to personal without problems...
R Just order the upgrade version you want and it'll be ok...
Great. Thanks Roel.
--
Regards
William
http://www.residues.info
Hello Thomas,
Tuesday, September 2, 2003, 6:29:26 PM, you wrote:
TF Hello Mark,
TF On Tue, 2 Sep 2003 13:18:46 -0400 GMT (03/09/2003, 00:18 +0700 GMT),
TF Mark wrote:
What are the message.att file attachment appear on all The Bat! v2.0
users e-mails?
TF Often they are PGP/MIME signatures,
Hi,
I just imported a Thawte smime certificate which I was hoping to use
with TB. I wrote a message, enabled Smime, requested that the message
be signed and then hit send. I was asked which cert to use-- the one
I had just imported was selected. I hit OK and, about twenty seconds
later, get an
1 - 100 of 140 matches
Mail list logo
