Re: Quote Colors

On Tuesday, September 9, 2003 at 11:45:28 PM, Anne wrote in the message "Quote Colors" : C>> How come the alternating quote coloring and the signature coloring C>> doesn't work when using the "Fixed width Font" viewer (Options -> C>> Preferences -> Viewer)? > My altern

Re: Broken threads and general threading question

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday, September 09, 2003, Vishal wrote... > Yes they are. However, the problem isn't confined to myrealbox. And > I think it's unlikely that everyone's providers suddenly went > haywire. Is there a common thread as to who is sending them, or is

Re: WARNING(virus check bypassed): Re[2]: HTML as default on v2.00 ...........? <-- anyone else seeing this 'WARNING' prefix?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday, September 09, 2003, Pixie wrote... > ..just trying to see if my ISP has been monkeying with something on > their servers or if others on the list are also seeing the same. I don't use my comcast account for emails, I run my own server, so

Re: zonealarm and automatic mail checks - works for anyone?

Ok, great. I just automatic mail checking with NO firewall installed and it still doesn't work. I'm using the eval version of 2.0.0.6. It looks like ZA wasn't to blame after all. What could be wrong? Cheers, -Vishal Current version is 2.00 | "Us

Re: HTML as default on v2.00 ...........?

On Wednesday, 10 September 2003, at 11:39:53 a.m., Sheldon Schuster wrote: > When did you become a member of the Gestapo HMTL police? HTML is > not a static entity--it is a dynamic changing standard that changes > as new user interests and technology develope. Are you still using > the text based

Re: Reply template oddity - any thoughts please?

On Wed 10 September 2003, 6:01:42 +1000, Alexander wrote: > Since converting an HTML reply to plain text in Outlook doesn't leave any > "Message" or whatever fragments, I'd assume it has been overlooked in TBv2. It was in tb! v1.6x as well. I have been aware of it for some time, but I just put up

IMAP converted to POP on install.

Hello TBUDL, I read somewhere, that in new ver install IMAP folders will be converted to POP. IS there then a way to convert them back? Or I'll have to delete accounts with IMAP access, and redo them again? Or try to restore backup from ver 1.62? What your advice will be? -

Re[2]: zonealarm and automatic mail checks - works for anyone?

Hi Anne Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 11:35:43 PM, you wrote: A> Just as a thought, is it perhaps anything to do with admin A> permissions on Win 2K? (scratching my head for suggestions as to A> the cause here). It shouldn't be a problem. The same firewall rules are in place no matter which accoun

Re[2]: zonealarm and automatic mail checks - works for anyone?

Hi Anne Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 11:38:13 PM, you wrote: A> S'ok ;-) No, all that's in my Trusted zone is our own network. Ok. Well I'm not sure what's wrong then. I'll keep looking Anne, thanks for your suggestions :) Cheers, -Vishal Cur

Re[4]: zonealarm and automatic mail checks - works for anyone?

Hi Brook Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 11:18:54 PM, you wrote: BH> have you tried outpost I'm ussing it here with no issues. Not yet. I'm aware of it though and someone else just brought it to my attention as well. I'll definitely keep it in mind if I can't get BlackICE to work. Thanks. Cheers,

Re[4]: zonealarm and automatic mail checks - works for anyone?

Hi malexander Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 10:24:44 PM, you wrote: m> Just noticed this, so apologies if you've been told this before, but m> Outpost works fine with no problems. I don't know what your AV is m> however, mine is Norton. Thanks for the tip. No I haven't been told it before, but I d

Re[2]: zonealarm and automatic mail checks - works for anyone?

Hi Marck Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 10:40:15 PM, you wrote: MDP> "Try" is a very interesting word to use in this context. The MDP> un-install procedure for ZA is less simple than it appears. Allie MDP> can tell you more of this. ZA is insidious and merely disabling or MDP> uninstalling it the ob

Re: Edit incoming messages shortcut?

On Tue 9 September 2003, 13:49:47 +1000, Sean H. wrote: > Thanks Allie! That's not the exact message I was looking for (the one > I remember was from over 6 months ago at least) but I think I'll be > able to get it to work using your instructions. Just need to translate > it to Win9x speak... I a

Re: Quote Colors

Wednesday, September 10, 2003, 2:08:16 AM, Chris wrote: C> How come the alternating quote coloring and the signature coloring C> doesn't work when using the "Fixed width Font" viewer (Options -> C> Preferences -> Viewer)? My alternate quotes are differently coloured - dark red and pale greeni

Re: zonealarm and automatic mail checks - works for anyone?

Wednesday, September 10, 2003, 2:53:49 AM, Vishal wrote: V> Oh, I know they go in the Internet zone. I really meant to ask whether you had V> to put the connection in the Trusted zone in order for it to work with TB. Looks V> like I didn't word it properly. S'ok ;-) No, all that's in my Trusted

Re: zonealarm and automatic mail checks - works for anyone?

Wednesday, September 10, 2003, 2:36:17 AM, Vishal wrote: V> I thought you might. Anyone not on Win2K seems to be working fine. Just as a thought, is it perhaps anything to do with admin permissions on Win 2K? (scratching my head for suggestions as to the cause here). -- Cheers, Anne Fl

Re: WARNING(virus check bypassed): Re[2]: HTML as default on v2.00 ...........? <-- anyone else seeing this 'WARNING' prefix?

Wednesday, September 10, 2003, 1:27:47 AM, Pixie wrote: P> about an hour or so ago a couple messages came in with this modified P> subject. Not just the thread I ripped the subject from but also 1 P> or 2 others has it. P> ..just trying to see if my ISP has been monkeying with something on P> th

Re: The URL prefix

Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 7:59:10 PM, Mark wrote: MA> Now how I post that to the wish/obvious omission list? :-) Wishlist is here: http://www.ritlabs.com/bt/ - it's in the same place as Bugtracker - you'll need to create a BT account there to be able to use it if you don't have one already.

Re: Connection Centre grabs full screen

Hi Matt, On Mon, 08 Sep 2003, at 22:54:54 [GMT -0700] (which was 15:54 where I live) you wrote: > It's not in the "tree" area along the left. This option is one of two > pull-down menus available in the lower right hand side of the > Preferences screen. Doh! -- John Phillips, Sydney, Australi

Re: WARNING(virus check bypassed): Re[2]: HTML as default on v2.00 ...........? <-- anyone else seeing this 'WARNING' prefix?

Pixie- Cool. I sneaked in under your virus check software? Got my mojo working today... Anyway, in digest mode the header on my message looks fine to me. -- -Mark Wieder Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2

Re: zonealarm and automatic mail checks - works for anyone?

Hi Vishal, @9-Sep-2003, 21:33 -0400 (02:33 UK time) Vishal [V] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Thomas: TF>> Isn't that an indicator that ZA has outlived its usefulness? V> ... But I did try uninstalling it and replacing it with Blackice ^^^ "Try" is a very int

Re: Re[2]: zonealarm and automatic mail checks - works for anyone?

>Hi Thomas > >Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 1:31:19 PM, you wrote: > >TF> Isn't that an indicator that ZA has outlived its usefulness? > >Perhaps. I'm reluctant though. I've already voiced my thoughts on this in >previous replies to Marck and Allie. But I did try uninstalling it and replacing >it wit

Re[2]: zonealarm and automatic mail checks - works for anyone?

Hi Anne Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 1:13:59 PM, you wrote: A> Yes this is no longer the case in ZA4 - internet connections go in the A> Internet zone not the Trusted zone - Oh, I know they go in the Internet zone. I really meant to ask whether you had to put the connection in the Trusted zone in

Re[2]: HTML as default on v2.00 ...........?

Hi Marck Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 12:13:35 PM, you wrote: D Hmmm. While some people who use HTML mail may abuse it, it is D the spammers etc themselves who are at fault, not HTML, I D think. MDP>>> That is not correct. The fault lies in the ability to write MDP>>> over-formatted m

Re[2]: Quick Templates usage (was: zonealarm and automatic mail checks - works for anyone?)

Hi Daniel Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 4:32:05 PM, you wrote: DR> It might be possible that you require at least one to be defined, DR> since the option lists the quick templates directly in the menu. Looks like it then. I'll definitely try out the multiple signatures thing. Thanks. Cheers, -Vi

Re[3]: zonealarm and automatic mail checks - works for anyone?

Hello Vishal, Wednesday, September 10, 2003, 2:33:28 AM, you wrote: V> Hi Thomas V> Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 1:31:19 PM, you wrote: TF>> Isn't that an indicator that ZA has outlived its usefulness? V> Perhaps. I'm reluctant though. I've already voiced my thoughts on V> this in previous repl

Re[2]: zonealarm and automatic mail checks - works for anyone?

Hi Anne Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 1:23:17 PM, you wrote: V>> Are you using Win98/Me? A> Yes Win98SE, and the ZoneAlarm is ZA Pro v4.0.123.012 I thought you might. Anyone not on Win2K seems to be working fine. V>> Yep. I even tried adding my mail servers to the Trusted zone but it didn't wor

Re[2]: Broken threads and general threading question

Hi Jeffrey Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 1:19:34 PM, you wrote: JAS> Hi Vishal, JAS> On Tue, 9 Sep 2003 11:19:54 -0400 you wrote: V>> Yes, same problem here. And no it shouldn't be a fastmail problem as you V>> mentioned elsewhere since I don't use it. JAS> Good to hear that someone els

Re[2]: HTML as default on v2.00 ...........?

Hi Leif Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 2:17:47 PM, you wrote: LG>Now take the HTML mail to a global scale. $365 x millions and LG>eventually billions of people per year. Yeah, that's a serious LG>waste of money. Assuming, of course, that your estimations were correct. You said yoursel

Re[2]: zonealarm and automatic mail checks - works for anyone?

Hi Thomas Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 1:31:19 PM, you wrote: TF> Isn't that an indicator that ZA has outlived its usefulness? Perhaps. I'm reluctant though. I've already voiced my thoughts on this in previous replies to Marck and Allie. But I did try uninstalling it and replacing it with Blackic

Re[2]: some threads not sorted as threads

Hi Roelof Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 1:40:34 PM, you wrote: RO> That amounts to the same. When you delete messages from the beginning RO> of a thread, the rest won't thread properly. They will appear as RO> separate thread, because the root they ought to have in common is RO> gone. That doesn't

Re[2]: Killing sobig on the server

Hello Dave, On Wednesday, September 10, 2003, 1:16:49 AM, you wrote: > Sunday, September 7, 2003, 2:34:06 AM, Gordon wrote: > G> I have been trying the Selective Download filters to avoid > G> downloading the SoBig infected files > I've been keeping an eye on this, but haven't seen any responses

Quote Colors

How come the alternating quote coloring and the signature coloring doesn't work when using the "Fixed width Font" viewer (Options -> Preferences -> Viewer)? -- Chris Quoting when replying to this message is good for your karma. Spotted in a toilet in a London office block: TOILET OUT OF ORDE

"Empty Folder"

Hi TBUDLers, I've noticed the "Empty Folder" function is considerably and annoyingly slower in v2 than in the 1.63 beta series. Although the progress indicator is nice. Can anyone confirm? -- Dave Using TB! 2.00 on Windows XP Pro Current versio

Where did the subject go in these messages?

Hi TBUDLers, I've been noticing a strange thing recently. It probably started sometime within the last couple of betas and is now happening on v2 as well. All emails from Allie Martin and a couple of others (Stuart Hemming and Chema Berian, perhaps others as well) appear in my message list with no

Re: Re: HTML as default on v2.00 ...........?

In my opinion, I believe there is nothing intrinsically wrong with HTML *if*, and *only if* it is used correctly according to the intent of its designers. Elsewhere in this thread are mentions of abusing HTML in email. Let's face it, HTML is abused far more on the web than in email. I think every

Re[2]: HTML as default on v2.00 ...........?

At 5:43 PM on 9/9/2003, Allister Jenks typed ... A> I think everyone in this thread who is supporting the use of HTML in A> emails should read the HTML 4.01 specification - all of it. Then you A> will understand that HTML is a /semantic/ markup language. It is A> _*NOT*_ a presentation tool. An

Re: something wrong with thebat tech mailing list?

Wilfried- Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 10:02:05 AM, you wrote: I also noticed your posted question on tbtech, but couldn't make sense of what you were asking, so I left well enough alone. Maybe respost with more explanation? It sounded like you had a question about AV DLLs, so it's probably approp

Re: something wrong with thebat tech mailing list?

Hi Wilfried, @9-Sep-2003, 19:02 +0200 (18:02 UK time) Wilfried Mestdagh [WM] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck: MDP>> It's working just fine. I saw your posts there. It's just a MDP>> low traffic list. WM> Thank you. Do you think I should repost it here ? That question in particular is p

Re: HTML as default on v2.00 ...........?

Hello Gerard, Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 3:08:30 PM, you wrote: G> Anything can be used in a right and a wrong way. If you receive one G> line e-mail from a friend saying they'll be over in an hour with G> some animated background image of trees swaying, it has more to do G> with your friend and

Re: HTML as default on v2.00 ...........?

On Tuesday, 9 September 2003, at 10:59:41 p.m., David Boggon wrote: > I don't want to open a can of worms here (or maybe I do) but what > is wrong with using HTML in email? what is behind TB's relegation of > HTML to the backburner? Well, the can is well and truly opened! In my opinion, I believ

Re[2]: Line lengths and techniques for automatic adjustment

Hello, Leif: Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 4:42:53 PM, you wrote: LG> Good question. Generally, I go to the paragraph in question and hit LG> ALT-L. Great tip. Thank you much. I'll bet there is somebody out there who knows the real black magic. LG> I normally have to do this because while thei

Re: HTML as default on v2.00 ...........?

ON Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 8:17:47 PM, you wrote: LG> There's a time and place for HTML e-mail. There are some discounter LG> outdoors companies that send me HTML e-mail showing their latest and LG> greatest deals with pics of the items for me to see. I like that, I LG> asked to receive them.

Re: Line lengths and techniques for automatic adjustment

Hello David, Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 2:21:36 PM, you wrote: DRA> Over the years I have learned that it is good to have about 70 DRA> characters in a line. (Perhaps that is somewhat subjective; no DRA> criticism is intended of those who keep their lines longer.) DRA> How do other Batters deal

Re: Quick Templates usage (was: zonealarm and automatic mail checks - works for anyone?)

Hello Vishal, Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 12:34:18 PM, you wrote: DR>> When in the mail editor, you can select the quick template from the DR>> menu as well(look in the Utilities menu for Insert Quick Template). > Idon't see such an option. I remember seeing it in 1.62r though. TB >

Headers Only for Big Msgs

If I D/L headers only for messages greater than, say, 10Kb, how would I then retrieve the entire message if I reviewed the header and wanted the body, too? -- JN Current version is 2.00 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/the

Line lengths and techniques for automatic adjustment

Greetings, In one recent message, this was the approximate length of a single line I received: (say, 107 characters) 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 1234567 Over the years I have learned that it is good to have about 70 characte

Re: Reply template oddity - any thoughts please?

09-Sep-2003 19:29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A>> ... I may not be of help with the initial problem (which looks incomplete A>> HTML filtering to me since the tag itself is filtered while its A>> contents remain)... > Yes but is that a TB! bug or something to do with the generating > Outlook do yo

Re: Connection center stopping oin particular mails

09-Sep-2003 20:55, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I use outlook firewall, but have also deactivated this. I assume you mean Outpost? :) > This is not a version 2 problem - was having the same problem > before upgrading. > Any ideas I'm using Outpost, too - this can't be the problem. In additio

Re: HTML as default on v2.00 ...........?

09-Sep-2003 15:01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > - HTML cannot be forwarded intact. That depends on the mailer. At work I'm forwarding HTML messages intact all the time (with Outlook - not that I like Outlook as a mailer!). -- Best regards, Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de) Dilbert's Words of

Re: Tool tips

Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 9:37:17 AM, Anne wrote: NL>> I haven't found a way to turn off the tool tips in the message window. NL>> These tool tips show message counts for the folder and can be NL>> annoying. Can they be turned off? > I can't find a way to do so at all. I would think this would

Re[2]: some threads not sorted as threads

Hello Roelof, RO> Only reason I can imagine it isn't threaded at your place is that you're RO> purging your messages too soon. Yes thanks for clarify. That is the reason. It is a lot of reply on messages all deleted here. It's the first time I saw this and was wondering wy without running m

Re: System for archiving

Hello Pixie, Monday, September 8, 2003, 10:28:20 PM, you wrote: P> I've run the dupe killer many times and it has always left the read P> copy if there is one. AFAIK it only uses the MSG-ID to determine if P> dupes are present, and doesn't span folders. So the same message in P> two different fo

Re: The URL prefix

Hi Anne, Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 6:47:41 PM, you wrote: A> Even if it's not clickable, if you highlight the URL - the A> http://foobar.com bit only - and right click there's an entry in the A> context menu that says Open URL - select that to open the URL anyhow.. A> works for me - I use this

Connection center stopping oin particular mails

Dear Bats I am still being driven crazy by the connection centre just stopping on emails from particular people from this mailing list. I have to go into the mail dispatcher to delete them from the server, and then I can continue. It is definitely specific to particular mailings - on retrying it a

Re: HTML as default on v2.00 ...........?

TF>>> Your choice is costing me money. D>> And exactly how much extra is it costing you? BBTE> Does it matter? Doing something that you know costs someone else money is BBTE> rude, even if it's no more than one cent. I regret the tone of my reply (D) above. Certainly in some parts of the world t

Re[2]: HTML as default on v2.00 ...........?

Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 1:14:57 PM, Thomas wrote: T> Your choice is costing me money. Outlandish HTML e-mail (with the dangerous stuff filtered by TB!) is mildly annoying. However, SPAM causes me much more heartache. In the past 6 months, I've received ~15,000 e-mails. Of those ~7,000 are SP

Language

Hallo tbudl, I have updated to The Bat v2 and by a mistake I lost the version 1.6 where I used the German Spell Checker and was very happy to have this service. I am a Norwegian and have some correspondence to Germany and would like to continue with that Spell Checker I had. I would b

Re: HTML as default on v2.00 ...........?

Hello Leif, > The point isn't so much how much you individually are costing someone, > but the collective of all e-mail, and what it costs everyone. > However, I don't need a one line e-mail from a friend saying they'll > be over in an hour with some animated background image of trees > swaying.

Re: Odd mini Bat2 Bug with window minimisation

Mark, M> Dear Bats M> Here is an odd bug. Can anyone verify. M> I have the bat set to minimise to the taskbar (rather than the M> system tray) although I doubt this makes a difference. M> The standard windows keyboard shortcut for minimising all open M> windows in Winkey-M. All programs I have

Re: No-show messages

A small clarification to my last message in which I said: P> -if there's new messages only in inbox, the inbox (nor the account) P> won't "light up". P> -if there's new messages in other folders too, then also the inbox P> lights up. Yes, it lights up, but only when new messages to other folder

Re: Odd mini Bat2 Bug with window minimisation

Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 6:51:56 PM, Mark wrote: M> The standard windows keyboard shortcut for minimising all open M> windows in Winkey-M. All programs I have except the Bat main M> window respond to this. Open messages in separate windows do M> respond. Irritates me a bit. Mine will minimize

Re: zonealarm and automatic mail checks - works for anyone?

Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 6:57:52 PM, DG wrote: DRS> I use ZonaeAlarm Pro 4 here with e-mail checking on and The_Bat! polls DRS> at it's expected intervals. Me also DG which is why it's such a puzzle why it won't work for Vishal :-( -- Cheers, Anne Flying high with The Bat! v2.00.6 o

Re: HTML as default on v2.00 ...........?

Hello David, Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 11:40:14 AM, you wrote: DB> And exactly how much extra is it costing you? The point isn't so much how much you individually are costing someone, but the collective of all e-mail, and what it costs everyone. 1. Let's say it costs 2 cents for someone to rec

Re: Tool tips

Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 6:55:07 AM, Neal wrote: NL> I haven't found a way to turn off the tool tips in the message window. NL> These tool tips show message counts for the folder and can be NL> annoying. Can they be turned off? I can't find a way to do so at all. -- Cheers, Anne Fly

Re: No-show messages

Hello Robin, Friday, September 5, 2003, 1:41:31 PM, you wrote: >> It's a different account in each case, but both of the accounts are >> about 3/4ths of the way down the list. The account in question never >> lights up until I select the inbox. RA> The second of three accounts here. It happens

Re: Reply template oddity - any thoughts please?

Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 12:00:56 PM, Coyle306 wrote: C> I've noticed the same thing when I reply in plain text to an html C> message. "Message" appears at the very beginning of the quoted C> original message text. Is this a bug that needs reporting then? -- Cheers, Anne

Re: The URL prefix

Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 11:20:33 AM, Mark wrote: MA> But if it is sent in this format http://foobar.com> then it is MA> not. Even if it's not clickable, if you highlight the URL - the http://foobar.com bit only - and right click there's an entry in the context menu that says Open URL - selec

Re: zonealarm and automatic mail checks - works for anyone?

Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 4:16:21 PM, Vishal wrote: t>> There was a problem in the past that in Zonealarm you had to make the t>> internet connection itself trusted. V> Ridiculous. And this has been fixed, you say? Yes this is no longer the case in ZA4 - internet connections go in the Interne

Re: Reply template oddity - any thoughts please?

Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 5:48:33 AM, Alexander wrote: A> ... I may not be of help with the initial problem (which looks incomplete A> HTML filtering to me since the tag itself is filtered while its A> contents remain)... Yes but is that a TB! bug or something to do with the generating Outlook

Re: zonealarm and automatic mail checks - works for anyone?

Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 5:09:16 AM, Vishal wrote: V> It's all part of another problem I was having with some messages V> being delayed a lot before arriving here. I got her reply to you V> before your original message. Seems that there's a lot of messages being affected that way - I keep seei

Re: Odd mini Bat2 Bug with window minimisation

--- Original Message From: Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tuesday September 09 2003 10:51AM PT M> Here is an odd bug. Can anyone verify. M> I have the bat set to minimise to the taskbar (rather than the M> system tray) although I doubt this makes a difference. M> The standard windows keyboard sh

Re[2]: zonealarm and automatic mail checks - works for anyone?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tuesday, September 09, 2003 1:56:15 PM (GMT -05:00) RE: "zonealarm and automatic mail checks - works for anyone?" Greetings Thomas, On Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 1:31:19 PM, you wrote: TF>>> Account / Properties / Options / Periodical Check every x

Re:HTML as default on v2.00 ...........?

P> Oh, I can't do that here... Eh? -- regards Clive Taylor Using TB 2.00.6 Current version is 2.00 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: HTML as default on v2.00 ...........?

It seems that David Boggon said ... TF>> Your choice is costing me money. D> And exactly how much extra is it costing you? Does it matter? Doing something that you know costs someone else money is rude, even if it's no more than one cent. -- Bill Blinn Technology Editor ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) -

Odd mini Bat2 Bug with window minimisation

Dear Bats Here is an odd bug. Can anyone verify. I have the bat set to minimise to the taskbar (rather than the system tray) although I doubt this makes a difference. The standard windows keyboard shortcut for minimising all open windows in Winkey-M. All programs I have except the Bat main windo

Re: HTML as default on v2.00 ...........?

Hi Thomas, on 9/9/03 you wrote: >> My point is freedom of choice TF> Your choice is costing me money. And exactly how much extra is it costing you? TF> so why do you advocate HTML mails? I never said I did. -- David Boggon [EMAIL PROTECTED] The UN estimates that the world's poorest co

Re: some threads not sorted as threads

Hallo Vishal, On Tue, 9 Sep 2003 11:55:43 -0400GMT (9-9-03, 17:55 +0200, where I live), you wrote: V> I'm having the same problem. I don't purge the messages, but I do delete them V> quickly. That amounts to the same. When you delete messages from the beginning of a thread, the rest won't thr

Re: HTML in the editor

Hello Marek, On Tue, 9 Sep 2003 11:59:15 +0200 GMT (09/09/2003, 16:59 +0700 GMT), Marek Mikus wrote: > yes, BT is up and running. Hm. I tried to report a bug and got this message: > Maintenance Time - 07 Sep 2003 04:17 - ray > Bughtracker will be offline for maintenance from 4:30 CDT (11:30 GMT

Re: zonealarm and automatic mail checks - works for anyone?

Hello Vishal, On Tue, 9 Sep 2003 11:06:30 -0400 GMT (09/09/2003, 22:06 +0700 GMT), Vishal wrote: TF>> Account / Properties / Options / Periodical Check every xx Minutes. > That's what my original post was about. ZA doesn't allow this to happen. Only > manual mail checks using alt-F2 or the 'c

Re: Spam

Hello tracer, On Tue, 9 Sep 2003 07:42:53 +0700 GMT (09/09/2003, 07:42 +0700 GMT), tracer wrote: > Now incase anyone wonders why it says I am thomas as registered user, Nobody is seeing this, unless he hits alt-F1 on your computer. Happy to see that you have gotten granis to work again. But why

Re[2]: something wrong with thebat tech mailing list?

Hello Marck, MDP> It's working just fine. I saw your posts there. It's just a low MDP> traffic list. Thank you. Do you think I should repost it here ? I hade the impression this list was more for _use_ problems, the other one more for _tech_ problems. If that's right, then I should not rep

Re: Broken threads and general threading question

Hi Vishal, On Tue, 9 Sep 2003 11:19:54 -0400 you wrote: V> Yes, same problem here. And no it shouldn't be a fastmail problem as you V> mentioned elsewhere since I don't use it. Good to hear that someone else is seeing it with The Bat!. I think that Thomas' point was that it was our prov

Re: HTML as default on v2.00 ...........?

Hello David, On Tue, 9 Sep 2003 15:17:11 +0100 GMT (09/09/2003, 21:17 +0700 GMT), David Boggon wrote: MDP>> It's not. It's the opposite of your point! > My point is freedom of choice Your choice is costing me money. But I'm still lucky; the days of paying extremely high prices per minute of int

Re: Invalid HTML is back (2.00.6)!

Hello Jernej, On Tue, 9 Sep 2003 17:13:40 +0200 GMT (09/09/2003, 22:13 +0700 GMT), Jernej Simončič wrote: >> I think this may be the offending header (for the problems with marking >> quotes): > This should be already known... Yes, it has been reported, and once again I confirm that the message

RE:HTML as default on v2.00 ...........?

Hello Dave, Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 4:31:02 PM, you wrote: > I'd still like for TB! to allow me as the end-user to select the > HTML editor as my default editor. I mean. really, there is an > option to turn on/off the little menu navigator thingy that I > ignored for at least a year until lea

Re: HTML as default on v2.00 ...........?

Hi Dhrakol, @9-Sep-2003, 11:03 -0400 (16:03 UK time) Vishal [D] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck: D>>> Hmmm. While some people who use HTML mail may abuse it, it is D>>> the spammers etc themselves who are at fault, not HTML, I D>>> think. MDP>> That is not correct. The fault lies in the a

Re[2]: Amnesty ...there is none!

Hello Leif, Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 10:54:13 AM, you wrote: Sorry Leif I was overcome with Joy. -- Best regards, Dangermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 2.00 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silv

Re: Amnesty ...there is none!

Hello Danger, Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 10:11:37 AM, you wrote: D> Sorry Leif I was overcome with Joy. No problem. It happens to all of us! -- Leif (TB list moderator and fellow end user). Using The Bat! 2.00 under Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 3 on a Pentium 4 2GHz with 512MB

Re: Message list headings

Hello Allie, > TB! has supported a column that displays the message colour group for > quite some time now. Please take a look at: http://perso.wanadoo.es/murech/threads.htm Does this happen also on V2.0? Thanks. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v1.62i

Re[2]: some threads not sorted as threads

Hi Roelof Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 11:39:58 AM, you wrote: WM>> Can someone tell me wy the thread: "Re[3]: zonealarm and automatic mail checks WM>> - works for anyone?" is not sorted as thread ? I see only 1 reference every WM>> time and the Re[x] is always incremented. RO> I'm viewin

Re: HTML & Spell Checker

Hallo Freddie, On Tue, 9 Sep 2003 08:03:46 -0700GMT (9-9-03, 17:03 +0200, where I live), you wrote: FF> Is it my imagination, No. FF> or does the spell checker not work with the HTML editor? -- Groetjes, Roelof Current version is 2.00 | "Us

Re: some threads not sorted as threads

Hallo Wilfried, On Tue, 9 Sep 2003 16:16:54 +0200GMT (9-9-03, 16:16 +0200, where I live), you wrote: WM> Can someone tell me wy the thread: "Re[3]: zonealarm and automatic mail checks WM> - works for anyone?" is not sorted as thread ? I see only 1 reference every WM> time and the Re[x] is

Re[2]: zonealarm and automatic mail checks - works for anyone?

Hi Daniel Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 10:40:14 AM, you wrote: >> Now *that* I find really interesting. How do you do this - by having different >> quick templates for different signatures? DR> Yes. >> If so, doesn't remembering all those >> keyboard combinations get to be a pain after a whil

Re[5]: zonealarm and automatic mail checks - works for anyone?

Hi tracer Monday, September 8, 2003, 9:01:52 PM, you wrote: t> There was a problem in the past that in Zonealarm you had to make the t> internet connection itself trusted. Ridiculous. And this has been fixed, you say? t> Due to a very flakey connection I see not all posts or see them very t> la

Re: Broken threads and general threading question

Hi Jeffrey Monday, September 8, 2003, 1:30:46 PM, you wrote: JAS> I notice that many of the threads in this group end up broken. This JAS> seems especially obvious when The Bat! is threading based upon JAS> reference (Alt-1). I would have thought that since the bulk of us are JAS> using The Bat!

Re[2]: HTML as default on v2.00 ...........?

Hi Marck Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 9:11:20 AM, you wrote: D>> Hmmm. While some people who use HTML mail may abuse it, it is the D>> spammers etc themselves who are at fault, not HTML, I think. MDP> That is not correct. The fault lies in the ability to write MDP> over-formatted messages. I th

Re[2]: zonealarm and automatic mail checks - works for anyone?

Hi Thomas Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 12:49:19 AM, you wrote: TF> Hello Vishal, TF> On Tue, 9 Sep 2003 00:34:14 -0400 GMT (09/09/2003, 11:34 +0700 GMT), TF> Vishal wrote: >> It can check email automatically? No need to press Alt+F2? It looks like >> everyone who can do this properly is

Re: Killing sobig on the server

Sunday, September 7, 2003, 2:34:06 AM, Gordon wrote: G> I have been trying the Selective Download filters to avoid G> downloading the SoBig infected files I've been keeping an eye on this, but haven't seen any responses. Did you figure out how to do it? -- Dave Kennedy

Re: Invalid HTML is back (2.00.6)!

On Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 17:02:19, Peter Fjelsten wrote: > I think this may be the offending header (for the problems with marking > quotes): This should be already known... -- Jernej Simoncic, [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www2.arnes.si/~sopjsimo/ http://deepthought.ena.si/ The shortest dist

  1   2   >