Tuesday, May 4, 2004, 11:07:12 AM, you wrote:
CT> This is straight from FM's FAQ - it's a one-off set up..
Thank you! Apparently I didn't read far enough into the
FAQ ... sorry ... So that might be workable .. I might
have to do some tinkering here.
Lynn
TBv 2.04.7 Windowsv 5
--
[EMAIL PROT
Tuesday, May 4, 2004, 7:57:28 AM, you wrote:
PF> TB! filtering engine is being rewritten as it
PF> does not work for IMAP at
PF> the moment.
PF> Watch coming releases...
I will .. thanks
Lynn
TBv 2.04.7 Windowsv 5
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]* * *Aun Aprendo
I'd rather be WARP'ed* * *
Monday, May 3, 2004, 10:33:40 PM, you wrote:
>> do FastMail and MailSnare actually forward the mail out? If so, why
>> can't it be forwarded to a POP account in TB?
CT> Have a look at FastMail's features.
Yes, I did that yesterday after I'd posted .. I often do
things backwards :-)
CT> Go to
Monday, May 3, 2004, 10:42:50 AM, you wrote:
CT> I've just mentioned to Jim that FastMail or
CT> Mailsnare offer extremely
CT> good POP, IMAP and forwarding facilities for external mail.
well, I'm looking at Mulberry, but ... :-( I'm really not
keen on web interfaces; do FastMail and MailSnare
a
Monday, May 3, 2004, 9:52:21 AM, you wrote:
JL> I just recently set up an IMAP account with the smtp (outgoing)
JL> specified, and I forward the IMAP incoming to a
JL> POP3 account, and set up a
JL> filter to change the colo(u)r option for the mail from that account.
JL> So I read the mail via a
Monday, May 3, 2004, 9:34:51 AM, you wrote:
J> I don't often use BCC but it might work for that.
Ah .. I do use it, but it's a bit surprising that that
would get through .. if it'll let me through, it'll let
the spammers through, won't it ..
J> I came across some
J> 'mail list' widget on the c
Monday, May 3, 2004, 8:16:32 AM, you wrote:
LT>> I find it interesting that *their* servers don't
LT>> seem to be blacklisted ...
TF> Not so. I have to manually insert each emnail contact
TF> with a Yahoo address into my whitelist on GMX. ;-)
lol! Good news, and bad news :-)
Since there is no
Monday, May 3, 2004, 8:24:21 AM, you wrote:
>> This is a real irritant ... at least one isp blocks some
>> comcast servers, and though I have other email options,
J> It sounds like the same mentality of the X-Mailer blocking admins.
J> Comcast limits SMTP use for it's -customers- pretty severely
Monday, May 3, 2004, 6:37:38 AM, you wrote:
TF> Well, if your ISP decides to reject mails from domains that are in
TF> obscure blacklists for wrong reasons, I wouldn't call it your choice
TF> any more.
This is a real irritant ... at least one isp blocks some
comcast servers, and though I have ot
Thursday, April 22, 2004, 10:52:24 PM, you wrote:
CT> I know this topic must be boring the pants off non IMAP users but
I'm glad to see it ...
I recently got a little Gentoo server up, with an IMAP
mail server, and TB won't let me make any folders for
that account ..
I've been trying to f
Tuesday, September 24, 2002, 3:48:06 AM, you wrote:
ACM> There's another thing that breaks the address book templates being
ACM> auto-applied as they should. This is when you have a single entry
ACM> but there are multiple addresses entered with duplication of one or
ACM> more of them. The even
Tuesday, September 24, 2002, 1:39:47 AM, you wrote:
RO> Hallo Lynn,
RO> On Mon, 23 Sep 2002 09:54:24 -0700GMT (23-9-02, 18:54 +0200GMT, where
RO> I live), you wrote:
LT>> After reading so many posts about the AB templates (but
LT>> without any real instructions), I decided to give them a
LT>>
Hi Batters ..
After reading so many posts about the AB templates (but
without any real instructions), I decided to give them a
shot.
However, I'm missing something, because I either get 2
sets of templates on a given mail (where I built the AB
templates), or none at all ... (after dumping the
Friday, September 20, 2002, 12:51:59 PM, you wrote:
[snip]
KC> There really is no need to use a 3rd party filter if you invest a
KC> little time setting up The Bats filters. The end result is effective
KC> spam filtering with only one program ... your e-mail program. The
KC> Bat's backup facil
Thursday, September 12, 2002, 4:47:51 AM, you wrote:
BBTE> For quite some time, I've seen a problem that I thought was a bug in
BBTE> TB, but now I'm not so sure. Maybe it's something that I should be
BBTE> blaming on NAV.
BBTE> When a message with multiple attachments arrives, if the attachme
Wednesday, September 4, 2002, 9:44:58 AM, you wrote:
>>No :) There have been much talk regarding this; search the archives.
>>IIRC, someone from Ritlabs has also pointed out why this feature was
>>left out of TB!
AdG> Oh, but it _is_ there, though in the wrong place. Right-click on the
AdG> M
Wednesday, September 4, 2002, 7:41:45 AM, you wrote:
RR>> Maybe I'm the only one that feels this way though:)
SP> No :) There have been much talk regarding this; search the archives.
SP> IIRC, someone from Ritlabs has also pointed out why this feature was
SP> left out of TB!
Clue us on the re
Tuesday, September 3, 2002, 10:53:53 PM, you wrote:
>> It's Office 97 Professional ... I'm too mean to upgrade him :-)
DH> Perhaps you should, at least Word 2K is a lot better in certain areas
DH> (like synonyms, which are now offered directly in the context menu).
He's satisfied with it, an
Tuesday, September 3, 2002, 11:22:57 AM, you wrote:
LT>> how about instructions to deactivate the code? Private mail is fine.
G> Hi Lynn,
G> I tried to find it again but couldn't. If I remember correctly it was a
G> small patch program. Maybe someone else on this list knows. Which
G> vers
Tuesday, September 3, 2002, 7:28:48 AM, you wrote:
JA>> I don't think I can find any information in the MS help files about it
JA>> storing information about your user details in their documents either,
JA>> and I'm not just talking about the stuff you can change. Each
JA>> document you create
Monday, September 2, 2002, 12:41:06 PM, you wrote:
MDP> Rats! foiled and hoist by my own petard (whatever a petard is)
It's the gizmo that lets you hoist the flag up the pole :-)
Lynn
1.60m on Win2kPro SP2
--
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * *Aun Aprendo
I'd rather be WARP'ed
Saturday, August 31, 2002, 3:11:13 PM, you wrote:
MSD> dear people...
MSD> i'm subscribed to a yahoogroups and i use digest mode for the
MSD> group. The problem is when someone use the bat sig delimiter
MSD> (dash dash space enter) and there are more than 1 message sent in
MSD> the digest so t
Friday, August 23, 2002, 1:16:46 PM, you wrote:
>> That wasn't what got my attention, but I have been
>> beginning to think there was something wrong with me. I
>> thought it was as easy to get off the ground as anything
>> I'd ever used, too.
E> Of course, it is easy to get off the ground. W
Wednesday, August 21, 2002, 6:10:03 PM, you wrote:
R> actually that's exactly how I found the bat!. I was looking for
R> something that functioned and was more advanced than what I was
R> using.
Hi Razgo -
Did you find it difficult to set up and use?
I've been using TB for several years, bu
Wednesday, August 21, 2002, 11:04:13 AM, you wrote:
B> IMHO, most anyone who bothers to find out about TB and
B> downloads it to give it a shot is, by definition,
B> probably NOT a beginner at e-mail. They are
B> specifically looking for something more advanced than
B> what they are currently u
Tuesday, August 20, 2002, 10:07:49 AM, you wrote:
E> Yes, I think people are wonderful about answering the questions
E> that newcomers might pose, if the newcomers are willing to
E> surface. But many threads are way over their heads or of no
E> interest to a beginner who is attempting to learn
Tuesday, August 20, 2002, 5:50:29 AM, you wrote:
BH> Ok the last time I asked if it could be done. It can
BH> so how many would like to see it on linux?
I would .. when I get my box up again :-)
I didn't find a really satisfactory client when I had it
up before. They worked, but ...
BH> Also
Monday, August 19, 2002, 1:35:31 PM, you wrote:
DH> http://www.iarchitect.com/mshame.htm
DH> Seems the site sometimes has some trouble. Yesterday I
DH> couldn't access it, and now it takes forever. One has
DH> to try ...
Ah .. I couldn't get there from the link, so I googled
'Interface Hall o
Wednesday, August 14, 2002, 12:13:15 PM, you wrote:
LT>> Oh dear .. and it's an old trackball, and kind of grubby,
LT>> too!lol!
C> Your trackball is still safe .. syafril is blocking OUTGOING
C> Outlook.
C> He is not filtering incoming.
C> Cheers Yall
C> -Cricket
What a relief! It's a de
Wednesday, August 14, 2002, 6:46:21 AM, you wrote:
>> The highest percentage by far comes in labeled Outlook or
>> OE... but I'll eat my trackball if anybody ever filters on
>> Outlook.
SH> I did in my office server. I made Outlook Filtering
SH> since last 2-years for any of /outgoing/ message
Tuesday, August 13, 2002, 6:58:16 PM, you wrote:
[snip most of long, interesting discussion]
TF> Am I right in assuming that you won't block Outlook, because "you
TF> can't do *that*!" ?
I'm butting in here, but ...
I've been working on anti spam for the last few months,
and well over half t
Monday, August 12, 2002, 10:20:45 PM, you wrote:
LT>> I tried it for a while, too, but have found that TB
LT>> filtering is more effective
WM> As an aside, a female friend was receiving unwanted
WM> emails from an admirer - not typical spam. I suggested
WM> she 'bounce' them using Mailwasher a
Monday, August 12, 2002, 9:03:31 PM, you wrote:
B> FWIW, Mailwasher is not an AV program. It's like TB's
B> Mail Dispatcher on steroids. I gave up using it because
B> its bounce feature (which seems to make it attractive)
B> does nothing to reduce spam.
I tried it for a while, too, but have fo
Monday, August 12, 2002, 7:16:05 PM, you wrote:
TF> What I am saying is that the double negative should be avoided in
TF> English, as otherwise nobody won't understand nothing! ;-)
That's about what they told me when I was in school .. but
they put it considerably more strongly than that :-)
Sunday, August 11, 2002, 3:38:36 PM, you wrote:
>> Come on Thomas, you have to be a bit more open minded.
>> He's not asking to make it bigger, just re-sizeable.
>> You could keep it as small as you wanted for yourself.
DAC> It is not the size which I find lacking, but the lack
DAC> of ability
Tuesday, July 30, 2002, 12:45:15 AM, you wrote:
JF> I have a few friends who absolutely insist to work with OE 6.0,
JF> with the
JF> html editor on. :-(
JF> I don't mind, but replying is a horror: the quoted lines are
JF> over 160
JF> characters wide! Is there anything I can do about that? I tr
Monday, July 29, 2002, 12:01:25 PM, you wrote:
On the subject of firewalls, I'm using the Wingate (v4.x)
firewall (which doesn't interfere with TB), but I have no
clue how reliable it is.
Anybody know? I don't know any way to test it, other than
Steve Gibsons port prober, which says it's cool
Sunday, July 28, 2002, 2:25:12 PM, you wrote:
JR>> Sudip is right though - both 2000 and 2001 need manual
JR>> configuration
JR>> of The Bat to scan mail. I cannot see how email scanning
JR>> will occur if
JR>> this is not done.
KLc>As I said, I *did* tell Nav that I was using an "other" e
Sunday, July 28, 2002, 1:19:24 PM, you wrote:
JBL> On Sunday, July 28, 2002, 4:47:00 PM, Lynn Turriff wrote:
>> One suspects that it does it so the recipient can see the
>> 'scanned virus free by Norton' note that it puts in the
>> email, but that's p
Saturday, July 27, 2002, 8:45:44 PM, you wrote:
KLc> Yep, that's what I was suggesting he do. Scanning
KLc> outbound mail is, to me, redundant, assuming NAV is
KLc> doing its job in the first place, and that stupid
KLc> splash/banner (which cannot be turned off if the
KLc> outbound scanning is
Saturday, July 27, 2002, 8:14:11 PM, you wrote:
AdG>> I think it is the duty of every subscriber to read every message
AdG>> that is being potsted on TBUDL.
TF> No. It is the right of every subscriber, but not the duty. I read the
TF> first and maybe second message of every thread, and if i
Saturday, July 27, 2002, 5:31:46 PM, you wrote:
A> Speaking of which, what proportion of folks do skip
A> threads entirely on such basis? Versus reading all
A> mail.
I do.
A> I'd be curious. And I wonder too what ya do with
A> threads with a bunch of Unread status indicators, sort
A> of glari
Saturday, July 27, 2002, 2:47:34 PM, you wrote:
JS> Excuse me for jumping in, but I DO use NAV with TB!, and
JS> that IS
JS> exactly what NAV does! It squirrels the email *directly*
JS> to its
JS> quarantine directory and does *not* let come into the Inbox.
JS> And in
JS> fact,
Saturday, July 27, 2002, 4:02:54 AM, you wrote:
TF> Thanks to you and all the people that have given examples of how
TF> they
TF> use the mass mailing feature without being spammers. I've
TF> learned that
TF> there is quite a legitimate use for the feature. I might even
TF> look
TF> into it mys
Thursday, July 25, 2002, 1:46:28 AM, you wrote:
JP> Hello Adam
JP> You wrote On Wed, 24 Jul 2002, at 22:54:57 [GMT -0230] (11:24:57 Thursday, 25
July 2002 where I live):-
>> Some tasks are now active
>> Do you want to exit when they are finished?
>> Yes// No //
JP> IMO this is an annoy
Hi all -
I just want to thank everybody who helped out with this
filtering. I think it's working fairly well now, though it
could use some tweaking. I'm hoping to do that without
hollering help, though :-)
Lynn
--
1.60q on Win2kPro SP2
[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * *Aun Aprendo
I'd rat
Tuesday, July 23, 2002, 10:13:11 AM, you wrote:
RO> Hallo Lynn,
RO> On Tue, 23 Jul 2002 09:01:08 -0700GMT (23-7-02, 18:01 +0200GMT, where
RO> I live), you wrote:
LT>> Because, as I mentioned in a previous mail, either I have
LT>> to put them in my 'personal' AB, where I don't want them,
LT>>
Monday, July 22, 2002, 3:28:25 PM, you wrote:
>> so do I list this as 'sender', or as 'kludges', or
>> what?
DAC> I'm using sender for those.
Hmmm .. then I think my current problems must be mostly
the order.
Thanks,
Lynn
--
1.60q on Win2kPro SP2
[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * *Aun
Monday, July 22, 2002, 5:24:16 PM, you wrote:
[snip]
Hi Allie -
ACM> Sounds like you need to invest in one of those
ACM> specialist spam filtering tools that have been
ACM> mentioned on this list now and then, like Spam Weasel
ACM> or SpamCop.
I may resort to that, but looking at some of the
Monday, July 22, 2002, 5:29:50 PM, you wrote:
TM>>> All you would need to do is highlight the msg and
TM>>> Ctrl-W to add the new spamer to the AB Group and
TM>>> away you go...
LT>> I'd rather not do this, if it can be avoided, but anyway
JN> Lynn,
JN> I'm interested in why you would rather
Monday, July 22, 2002, 1:36:41 PM, you wrote:
[snip]
DAC> First, is there some advantage to having one filter with all the
DAC> alternative spam items, instead of a number of filters.
I don't know .. but my filter list is so long that if I
want to find one for some reason, it's an awful pain,
Monday, July 22, 2002, 1:14:55 PM, you wrote:
[snip]
JA> You use "Add Set". I think alt-ins adds an AND to the OR statement.
JA> So it'd be like this:
JA> A or B AND C
OK, I thought that might be the way it worked.
JA> Hrm... no idea.
I'll go over them again .. who knows what I might ha
Monday, July 22, 2002, 1:04:51 PM, you wrote:
MDP> Completely. In build 'q' of 1.60. 1.61 was 100% stable and 1.62
MDP> is
MDP> now in beta. Keep up!! ;-)
MDP> - --
MDP> Cheers -- .\\arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator
Honey, if I could reduce this damn spam to a sensible
level, I might be a
Monday, July 22, 2002, 1:03:51 PM, you wrote:
[snip]
LG> It has, I'm sure about that. This setting has been there for quite a
LG> while now (as far back as my TB experience goes, which must be 1.47
LG> Halloween Edition, IIRC). There is also a scroll bar on this tab which
LG> allows one to scr
Monday, July 22, 2002, 8:11:39 AM, you wrote:
JA> Yes... I think you're making a long AND query... so ALL the
JA> addresses
JA> would have to be listed. Move all but the first one to the
JA> alternatives page, and try running the filter again.
I did that - moved all but the first address to t
Monday, July 22, 2002, 8:49:10 AM, you wrote:
[snip]
TM> I would suggest a little different approach. Put all your spam
TM> addresses in a 'spamers' AB group, then have your filter process
TM> against that AB group. That way you don't need to modify your filter
TM> each time you want to add a
Hi all -
I've been building spam filters lately, as some of you are
aware, and it seemed like I ought to be able to use the
'add' button on the 'general' tab of the filters page to
make a list of addresses that ought to go into a
particular folder. But for some reason those filters are
being tot
Sunday, July 21, 2002, 6:34:34 PM, you wrote:
DH> Only six of the 21 spam messages lack X-MSMail-Priority and none
DH> of
DH> them are hard core spam. They're spam for insurance or vacations
DH> or
DH> something equally innocuous. The nastiest ones all have the
DH> X-MSMail-Priority or X-MS-Pri
Wednesday, July 17, 2002, 12:11:42 PM, you wrote:
[snip]
>> sometimes a drive refresh will do it. Sometimes not.
MO> Ehrr? What is a drive refresh?
Sorry .. just do view/refresh in the explorer on whatever drive
had the stuck folder in it .. *Sometimes* that works ..
Lynn
1.60h on Win2
Wednesday, July 17, 2002, 10:34:24 AM, you wrote:
JA> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
JA> Hash: SHA1
JA> On Wednesday, July 17, 2002, Michael Thompson wrote...
>> I am using WinXP Professional and every once in a while I am unable
>> to delete some directorys, rename them etc. I get the Me
Wednesday, July 17, 2002, 8:32:20 AM, you wrote:
[snip]
JA> I personally cannot stand emails flying into my inbox
JA> with size 50 purple font, on yellow backgrounds (which
JA> is always the case from a friend). That is something I
JA> like about TB!, the ability to turn off the HTML when
JA> i
Tuesday, July 16, 2002, 8:47:11 AM, you wrote:
[snip]
JA> Although they found the plain text switch... try looking at the
JA> headers. If I remember correctly, (at least the version I saw
JA> anyway), put in a whole load of X- headers for other incredimail
JA> users, which can create a substa
Tuesday, July 16, 2002, 4:35:03 PM, you wrote:
[snip]
BK> NOOO! Why do you use Opera? It isn't properly CSS or HTML compliant!
BK> Please please please use a browser based on the Gecko engine (like
BK> Mozilla or K-Meleon) to give web site designers (such as me) an actual
BK> standard that we
Tuesday, July 16, 2002, 10:56:35 AM, you wrote:
[snip]
TF> I believe for dual boot you need seperate partitions anyway.
TF> (Partition Magic comes to mind.) If you have programs or data on the
TF> NTFS partition (and you will have), I have no idea whether it is
TF> possible to recover these whe
Tuesday, July 16, 2002, 9:02:35 AM, you wrote:
JB> Computers are designed to entertain and I say if people *want* to send
JB> e-mail as html by god let 'em.
So far, so good, but a lot of the html mail I get is
nearly unreadable ... if they'd compose for readability
instead of animated gifs and
Tuesday, July 16, 2002, 8:16:26 AM, you wrote:
SP> Everytime she gets mail (which is one every minute!!), her
SP> animated
SP> "cute doggy" notifier pops up and announces new mail with most
SP> irritating of barks ! If she'd only agree to learn TB! ..
Would make me crazy .. I support a friend
Tuesday, July 16, 2002, 12:06:15 AM, you wrote:
SP> Hi Batpeople,
SP>How do you, married folks, manage to share the same computer with
SP>your wife err.. spouse to be gender sensitive, specially if she/he
SP>is of IncrediMail genus, without loosing your cool ?? !!
I was going to
Tuesday, July 16, 2002, 6:22:01 AM, you wrote:
DvRC> Ehm, I just noticed that Internet Explorer does the same thing
DvRC> when
DvRC> you just miss the vertical scroll bar and drag the mouse
DvRC> sideways.
I've been reading this thread with interest, because I've
noticed the same thing .. or
Sunday, July 14, 2002, 2:49:42 AM, you wrote:
[snip]
TF> This is absolutely correct. Sorry, I didn't point it out. You need to
TF> copy the file account.srx from the account with the filters to the
TF> account where you want the filters to be copied to. It is a good idea
TF> to back up (rename)
Saturday, July 13, 2002, 10:09:24 PM, you wrote:
JA> Hi Thomas,
JA> On Sun, 14 Jul 2002 11:38:56 +0700, you wrote:
>> ..for example copying the account.srx file over. ;-)
JA> Wouldn't know what the file was... but I'm sure you're probably right... I would
JA> peek, but work is a little far aw
Saturday, July 13, 2002, 10:06:00 AM, you wrote:
JA> Hi Lynn,
JA> On Sat, 13 Jul 2002 09:17:43 -0700, you wrote:
>> I'm not doing them all, but there are a few obvious
>> troublemakers ..
JA> Most or .kr and those kind of areas? ;)
The ones I'm actually trying to block this way are forged
'f
Saturday, July 13, 2002, 10:01:12 AM, you wrote:
JA> Hi Lynn,
JA> On Sat, 13 Jul 2002 08:57:44 -0700, you wrote:
>> JA> Did you install swat? It's a nice samba configuration generator in a web
>> JA> browser.. makes things a lot easier :)
>>
>> Oh yes ... it may have been a hardware thing, I
Thursday, July 11, 2002, 8:40:00 PM, you wrote:
JA> Hi Lynn,
JA> On Thu, 11 Jul 2002 06:52:49 -0700, you wrote:
>> In my quest for spam reduction options, I've decided to
>> filter on the ip's of spam mails which apparently have
>> forged 'from' addresses. If I make a list of these and use
>>
Thursday, July 11, 2002, 10:13:33 PM, you wrote:
JA> Hi Lynn,
JA> On Tue, 9 Jul 2002 07:50:24 -0700, you wrote:
>> TF> Have you checked out Micheal Robertson's new pet project?
>> TF> http://www.lindows.com/
>>
>> Checking it out now .. I didn't go as far as I wanted to
>> with RedHat, becaus
Thursday, July 11, 2002, 7:30:04 AM, you wrote:
MDP> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
MDP> Hash: SHA1
MDP> Hi Lynn,
MDP> @11 July 2002, 06:52 -0700 (14:52 UK time) Lynn Turriff [LT] in
MDP> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
LT>> If I make a l
Thursday, July 11, 2002, 6:59:10 AM, you wrote:
G> Hi Lynn,
G> Copy everything between beginfilter & endfilter
G> Go to sorting office incoming mail filter and press Ctr-V
G> You have now copied a filter.
G> String1a&string2a are AND functions
G> String2b&string2b are AND functions
G> String
Thursday, July 11, 2002, 12:18:00 PM, you wrote:
TF> Hello Robert,
TF> On Thu, 11 Jul 2002 14:25:02 -0400 GMT (12/07/02, 01:25 +0700 GMT),
TF> Robert D. wrote:
>>> Copy everything between beginfilter & endfilter
>>> Go to sorting office incoming mail filter and press Ctr-V
RD>> I like this
Hi guys ..
In my quest for spam reduction options, I've decided to
filter on the ip's of spam mails which apparently have
forged 'from' addresses. If I make a list of these and use
the 'add' button to add a rule, will these rules be
applied as 'or', or as 'and' .. ?
If the latter, can I make a
Wednesday, July 10, 2002, 5:19:01 AM, you wrote:
EC> Dear readers from 'TB!udl List',
EC> When clicking on a 'Send me a mail' button from Opera v6.03 TB! does
EC> not start an empty editor. I've declared the following in the Opera
EC> Preference table: /theBat.exe %1/ (without slashes).
EC> D
Monday, July 8, 2002, 11:04:42 PM, you wrote:
TF> Hello Lynn,
TF> On Mon, 8 Jul 2002 07:59:49 -0700 GMT (08/07/02, 21:59 +0700 GMT),
TF> Lynn Turriff wrote:
LT>> Only until I can find a way to run my proprietary and
LT>> industrial software packages in LINUX ...
TF&
Monday, July 8, 2002, 7:54:14 AM, you wrote:
JU> Nick,
JU> Monday, July 8, 2002, 9:32:29 AM, you typed:
NA>> Must be a spelling mistake, right? You wouldn't purposely slag a superb
NA>> Operating System... in fact you are using it yourself, correct?
JU> Just because you use it doesn't mean y
Monday, July 8, 2002, 7:32:29 AM, you wrote:
NA> Hello Lynn Turriff,
NA> In Reference to your Posting on Monday, July 08 2002 at 07:28 AM PDT,
>> Windoze has a character map ..
NA> ^^^
NA> Must be a spelling mistake, right? You wouldn't
NA> purposely slag
Monday, July 8, 2002, 7:11:08 AM, you wrote:
[snip]
Windoze has a character map .. I probably ran a search to
find it, put a shortcut on my desktop. It's called
charmap.exe in W2kPro. The character in question has to be
in the font you are using ...
Lynn
R> Yeah sort of... Only I am not awa
Sunday, June 30, 2002, 3:04:23 AM, you wrote:
MAU> Hello Lynn,
>> Reading Miquel's handy instructions (thanks Miguel) for
>> NewsTraq,...
MAU> What do you mean "thanks Miguel"? You owe me a beer ;-)
You got it .. next time I'm in your neighbourhood!
Lynn
--
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tuesday, June 25, 2002, 1:25:51 AM, you wrote:
[snip]
DvRC> Anyway, the Ritlabs people say that TB2 will support newsgroups, so
DvRC> this whole pro/con debate is really quite useless.
DvRC> Regards,
DvRC> -Daan-
I've been reading this thread with interest and some
puzzlement .. seems to me
Sunday, June 23, 2002, 9:11:06 PM, you wrote:
JA> Hi Lynn,
JA> On Sun, 23 Jun 2002 21:00:08 -0700, you wrote:
>> Thanks ..
>>
>> Is there any way, apart from intuitive deduction, to
>> identify which information is forged, and which genuine?
JA> Take a quick look at the headers... some (help
Sunday, June 23, 2002, 9:05:22 PM, you wrote:
JA> Try looking at the Full headers for the email... The
JA> From: header is easily forged, as you can tell, and
JA> can also be guessed from the recent Klez virus (or 99%
JA> of spam) ;)
Yeah, I see a lot of those too.
JA> By tracing down the rec
Sunday, June 23, 2002, 8:42:50 PM, you wrote:
TF> Hello Lynn,
TF> On Sun, 23 Jun 2002 20:39:20 -0700 GMT (24/06/02, 10:39 +0700 GMT),
TF> Lynn Turriff wrote:
LT>> I thought the last routing (closest to the body of the
LT>> mail) was the originator ... no?
TF> Yes. Bu
Sunday, June 23, 2002, 10:50:29 AM, you wrote:
JA> Hi Lynn,
JA> On Sun, 23 Jun 2002 10:27:26 -0700, you wrote:
>> I gather that only someone with SpamCop's resources has
>> any chance of figuring out where the thing really came
>> from ..?
JA> Depends on how easy you find it to type a command
Sunday, June 23, 2002, 8:17:33 AM, you wrote:
awc> Hello Listbuds,
awc> I've been reading about the spamcop and filtering, I periodically
awc> receive email from "me" that is not sent from me. If I look at
awc> the view headers, it says it came from me! How can this be? Now,
awc> I've submitte
Thursday, June 20, 2002, 8:19:11 AM, you wrote:
JEB> Right now I have a "Selective Download" filter set up, where any
JEB> messages containing particular header strings are deleted before
JEB> downloading. The header strings are in a text file; I have put a
JEB> shortcut on my desktop to this t
Sunday, June 16, 2002, 9:43:56 AM, you wrote:
ACM> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
ACM> Hash: SHA1
ACM> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
ACM> Lynn Turriff [LT] wrote:
LT>> Allie, I hit F4 to bring in just your bit of comment here,
LT&
Sunday, June 16, 2002, 5:47:16 AM, you wrote:
ACM> Currently, no.
ACM> You could create a quick template with the handle name 'fa',
ACM> containing: %To=""%To='"%OFROMNAME" <%OFROMADDR>'
ACM> You could then use F4 to generate the message with only the
ACM> selected
ACM> text, and then type t
Saturday, June 15, 2002, 7:18:50 AM, you wrote:
DW> Since I upgraded to 1.6q I think.I've noticed this doesn't
DW> always work any more. Sometimes, instead of the last message I
DW> viewed
DW> being highlighted, the highlighting moves back to the first
DW> message in
DW> the list. Anyon
Absolutely!
Lynn
Thursday, June 13, 2002, 7:00:20 PM, you wrote:
DAC> On Thursday, June 13, 2002, 3:18:02 PM, Chris Weaven wrote:
>> Here here, get's my vote too.
DAC> not wanting to feel left out, add my voice as well, for reply, reply
DAC> to all and reply to sender. Haven't thought this th
Thursday, June 13, 2002, 9:41:04 AM, you wrote:
PL> Hello Peter,
PL> Thursday, June 13, 2002, 2:41:40 AM, you wrote:
PP>> As you can see in Paddys request there seem to be something left. Or Paddy
PP>> 's using an unfixed 6.0.
PP>> In the latter case Paddy should update Opera and give it anot
Thursday, June 13, 2002, 1:34:06 PM, you wrote:
A> Hello Joseph,
A> Thursday, June 13, 2002, 4:12:06 PM, you wrote:
JN>> Is there a quick and easy mouse/menu way to reply with only a
JN>> selection quoted, i.e., the same result as making a selection and then
JN>> pressing F4?
A> Download the
Thursday, June 13, 2002, 1:03:15 PM, you wrote:
BM> Dear Joseph,
BM> Thursday, June 13, 2002 at 9:35:11 PM you wrote:
JN>> I haven't met an IT person yet who's heard of The Bat!
[snip]
BM> I am sorry - I thought this was the case everywhere, except in
BM> Denmark, where The Bat! is only
Tuesday, June 11, 2002, 5:14:16 AM, you wrote:
MP> Hello,
MP> I have checked my font and found the euro symbol, so it is available
MP> on my computer. When I received the message however I got this ¤
MP> (sun). I am using the 1.60q. Should not this work correctly then?
MP> --
MP> Best rega
Tuesday, June 11, 2002, 3:17:31 AM, you wrote:
MP> Hello Marck,
>> It will never be there in that form. It's just too
>> dangerous. I understand that support for retrieving
>> non-sent images will be added at some point *BUT* it
>> will only get one image at a time and prompt for
>> permission
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
