Re: IMAP Deleted items

Hi Allie, > Did you enable the message list for the window that appears when you > select the option to browse deleted messages? No! That looks a lot more useful - subject to the previously mentioned limitations!! Thanks a lot. -- Cheers, Philmailto:

Re: IMAP Deleted items

n addition it isn't really showing what is currently on the server, in that if you really remove stuff from the server using another client, the Bat still shows these items when browsing deleted messages. Dare I suggest that this is (the) one thing that Outlook and Outlook Express do better?

IMAP Deleted items

Hi all, Is there a way that I can see a list of items marked for deletion on an IMAP server? -- Cheers, Phil Bingham Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Possible IMAP problem in V2.11

the software firewall for the odd occasion when I have to use dial-up - most of the time I go though a router with a built in firewall, so turning it off for now is no great loss! Thanks for your replies, -- Cheers, Phil Current version is

Re: Possible IMAP problem in V2.11

l and 2.11 and subsequent do not. I can't find any useful messages in the firewall log. Does anyone know whether the way The Bat works for both IMAP and POP3 has changed in some subtle way for the 2.11 versions? -- Cheers, Phil Current

Re: Possible IMAP problem in V2.11

ry, i.e., > v2.11.02 Yes, I noticed this this morning. I'll give it a go tonight! -- Cheers, Phil Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Possible IMAP problem in V2.11

tried re-installing 2.10.03 over the top of 2.11 (and was surprised that this actually succeeded!) whereupon I was once again able to connect to the IMAP server. Has anyone else had similar problems with 2.11 or any suggestions as to what may have happened? -- Cheers, Phil Bi

Re: "Anti-SPAM plug-in learning engine"

Hi David, Tuesday, November 18, 2003, 10:34:28 AM, you wrote: > If you want more help follow the link above to the archive thread. > hope this helps Thanks. I'm all set up now! -- Cheers, Philmailto:[EMAI

Re: "Anti-SPAM plug-in learning engine"

s thread! I've found some references to the plugin but nothing about getting it to work. I've always found searching the archives to be somewhat difficult, unless you ask the right question! Has it always been the case that it is only possible to browse back 4 pages in the arch

"Anti-SPAM plug-in learning engine"

on. Given this was a new release, I would have expected that it would at least start off by being fairly comprehensive and at least integrate with all the help buttons on the dialogs! -- Cheers, Phil Current version is 2.01.3 | "Using

Re[2]: BLASTER WORM - was Re: can I change RE: into something else?

Greetings tracer! port 135 critical mass day. maybe time to start selling prebuilt stand alone firewalls again eh? Problem is - talking new users into the necessity. Days like today are good days to sell sell sell! Here is a nice photo. Wish my stocks looked like this: http://isc.sans.org/ima

massive lockups

Well, I Just noticed 3 messages got deleted. If someone wrote me, _please send again._ Cause I have no Idea what got deleted. I was in my mail2 directory testing and instead of CTRL-SHFT-F2 I hit F2 like a dummy. Spam filters kill just about everything. Probably this list. But I don't know for su

massive lockups

I haven't been on the list since back in 2001. So excuse me if I don't know any of the buzz words. I will try to describe what is happening as best I can. I had the bat 1.60 installed. I think I accidentally copied thebat.exe5,698,560 .a.. 8-01-03 22:47:50 Which is apparently from tb200b0

Re: Why do I get this Spam?

Hi Markus, Thursday, June 5, 2003, 1:21:50 PM, you wrote: > I hope this clarifies the matter. Thanks for the explanation. -- Cheers, Phil Current version is 1.62r | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverston

Why do I get this Spam?

" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Can anyone explain why I get these and also the best way to avoid receiving them in the future? -- Cheers, Phil mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 1.62r | &qu

Re[2]: "syntactically invalid HELO argument"

tem directory. You are absolutely correct, I had neglected to change the entry in my hosts file (..hangs head in shame!). -- Cheers, Philmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" inf

Re[4]: "syntactically invalid HELO argument"

Hi Mark, Wednesday, January 22, 2003, 12:16:53 AM, you wrote: > Phil- > If you really get desperate you could try telnetting to claranet's > server on the smtp port and try sending a HELO or EHLO message. I just > tried it and got in without a problem. > telnet claranet.c

Re[2]: "syntactically invalid HELO argument"

tuff with OE via claranet I can see the HELO greeting in the header. > The following information might be helpful in tracking down the problem: > - Is there any more information in the Bat's logs (Shift-Ctrl-A or > Account/View log)? Sadly not! > - What type of mail ser

"syntactically invalid HELO argument"

this? Cheers, Phil Bingham Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Problems with TLS/SSL SMTP posting in the bat

cate in The Bat! Does anyone have any ideas on how I could about resolving this? Thanks Phil Stoneman P.S. I'm running The Bat 1.61 and qmail 1.03 with the latest STARTTLS/smtp-auth patch from the qmail website TIA Phil -- Phil Stonemanmai

Re: IMAP over SSL?

or that :) Is this a bug-type problem, or simply an unfinished feature as yet, does anyone know? I'd tend to guess the latter, since the 'features' part of the webpage doesn't mention SSL support in The Bat, nor does the help file -- Phi

IMAP over SSL?

I posted a few days ago, but didn't hear anything, so am posting again. Can anyone else confirm/deny that IMAP4 in The Bat 1.61 will not use SSL, no matter what you set the account settings to? I've installed the relevant certificate; TB doesn't seem to even try to initiate

Re: Problems with TLS/SSL SMTP posting in the bat

for either STARTTLS or plain TLS, it still says 'making IMAP connection to port 143' in the log, and doesn't seem to do anything secure at all. Can anyone confirm/deny this? thanks -- Phil Stoneman

Problems with TLS/SSL SMTP posting in the bat

working with this SMTP server? I've tried asking google and google groups, with no luck :( Thanks Phil -- Phil Stonemanmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBUDL" info

imap

ssages. I KNOW this to be false...When i set up a pop connection everything works. AM I MISSING SOMETHING ??? Thanks in advance Phil Martinez Current Ver: 1.60h FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL

Re[2]: Upgrade

Hello Peter, Thursday, April 11, 2002, 12:04:00 PM, you wrote: PP> Hello Phil, PP> On Thursday, April 11, 2002 at 4:42:55 PM you wrote in PP> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (at least in part): PH>> I was using V 1.53D and downloaded new 1.60 and instructi

Upgrade

Hello I was using V 1.53D and downloaded new 1.60 and instructions were to simply install over existing version. This doe not work an error message is generated has anyone had this problem an know cure? -- Best regards, Phil mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re[3]: Digest (04/20/2001 01:01) Special Issue (#2001-997)

oi azrael! On Friday, April 20, 2001 at 15:17:15 GMT -0400 (12:17 PM in Sacramento), waiting for another fragmented packet from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 's transmission we received was: a> Hello Marck, a> Friday, April 20, 2001, 2:22:53 PM, you kindly wrote: MDP>> Whatever it may be reminiscent of,

Re[3]: change button icons interface

oi Átila! On Friday, April 20, 2001 at 16:06:28 GMT -0300 (12:06 PM in Sacramento), waiting for another fragmented packet from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 's transmission we received was: ÁC> phil declarou: >> oi Átila! ÁC> Você é brasileiro? >> On Friday, April 20, 200

Re: change button icons interface

oi Átila! On Friday, April 20, 2001 at 15:50:11 GMT -0300 (11:50 AM in Sacramento), waiting for another fragmented packet from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 's transmission we received was: ÁC> how can i change the button icons interface? ÁC> i saw the i need to change the glyph.bmp, but i can't find this

Re[2]: External Browser????

oi Marck! On Wednesday, March 21, 2001 at 17:16:37 GMT + (9:16 AM in Sacramento), waiting for another fragmented packet from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 's transmission we received was: LZ>> I am still looking for where this is in the registry. A search for LZ>> MIME turned up: LZ>> HKEY_CLASSES_ROO

Re[2]: Moving TB from Win98 to Win2K?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 oi A! On Tuesday, March 20, 2001 at 19:25:53 GMT -0500 (4:25 PM in Sacramento), waiting for another fragmented packet from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 's transmission we received was: ACM> Yes, it will work provided that you install TB! on a partition ACM

Re[2]: lots of cookies I need to just share with folks. (aye and hello again)

oi A! An emergency broadcast from an unknown source was picked up by several million truckers at 21:06:20 GMT -0500 (I think the time was 6:06 PM wherever the bright (practically pure white lighted room with that table was at?) Although I have several hours of missing time most of which elud

lots of cookies I need to just share with folks. (aye and hello again)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Greetings ! If it can be fixed by using the bat!, think you can fix it better without the bat!? Are you thinking about breaking up? Go on... Try the bat! These Days. There's no better way to break up, that will give you as much satisfaction as usage

Re: Communication between mail clients and external editors

Greetings Kenneth! On Wednesday, August 09, 2000 at 21:00:50 GMT -0700 (which was 9:00 PM where you think I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: KP> On Wed, 9 Aug 2000 20:37:54 -0500, Curtis wrote: I have a problem with it personally. Why can't the send action be made to close the edito

hacking batpgpxx.dll

What is involved in creating a dll to interface with something other than pgp? A dll that works with the bat. Does this file TB_Addon.dll have something hardcoded in to do it? What if someone had a crypto++ dll could that be made to work? Can we hack the resources on the S/MIME and get somethi

Re[7]: Two Format Questions

Greetings Joe! On Tuesday, August 08, 2000 at 23:14:43 GMT -0500 (which was 9:14 PM where you think I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: JF> Tuesday, August 08, 2000, 9:40:27 PM, phil, wrote: JF> [...] p>>>> Actually Henry Ford was a Genius, even though he only had 3 months(

Re[2]: Signing of Messages (Was: Re: List server rules)

Greetings Nick! On Tuesday, August 08, 2000 at 20:52:07 GMT -0700 (which was 8:52 PM where you think I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: NA> On August 8, 2000, at 6:04:17 PM, phil Wrote: TG>>> How does one use S/Mime in TheBat? I've got a certificate and have TG>>

Re[2]: Two Format Questions

Greetings Marck! On Tuesday, August 08, 2000 at 03:58:40 GMT +0100 (which was 7:58 PM where you think I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: MDP> "for a ha'p'worth of tar". The people who would benefit from the MDP> correction of this bug in auto-format aren't going to use an external MDP>

Re[5]: Two Format Questions

Greetings Joe! On Tuesday, August 08, 2000 at 21:07:41 GMT -0500 (which was 7:07 PM where you think I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: JF> Tuesday, August 08, 2000, 8:34:27 PM, phil, wrote: p>> Greetings Joe! p>> On Tuesday, August 08, 2000 at 18:40:16 GMT -0500 (which wa

Re[3]: Two Format Questions

Greetings Joe! On Tuesday, August 08, 2000 at 18:40:16 GMT -0500 (which was 4:40 PM where you think I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: JF> This is precisely why a really smart guy once said "Different JF> strokes for different folks." JF> It's also why cars come in different colors, some hav

Re[2]: Signing of Messages (Was: Re: List server rules)

Greetings Steve! On Tuesday, August 08, 2000 at 08:31:54 GMT -0700 (which was 8:31 AM where you think I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: SL> Tuesday, August 08, 2000, 8:20:58 AM, Deryk wrote: >> I don't think Microsoft invented S/MIME (which would explain >> everything as well) but they were c

Re[4]: Signing of Messages (Was: Re: List server rules)

Greetings Gary! On Tuesday, August 08, 2000 at 12:41:47 GMT -0500 (which was 10:41 AM where you think I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: G> Hi Graham, G> On Tuesday, August 08, 2000, 12:07 PM, you wrote in part about G> "Signing of Messages (Was: Re: List server rules)": G>> I disagree abo

Re[5]: Signing of Messages (Was: Re: List server rules)

Greetings Tony! On Tuesday, August 08, 2000 at 18:50:29 GMT +0100 (which was 10:50 AM where you think I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: TG> How does one use S/Mime in TheBat? I've got a certificate and have TG> exported it to TheBat directory but still don't seem able to use it. Don't feel b

Re[3]: Signing of Messages (Was: Re: List server rules)

Greetings David! On Tuesday, August 08, 2000 at 15:43:44 GMT +0100 (which was 7:43 AM where you think I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: DP> S/MIME on the other hand is much better where you don't personally DP> know the people you are communicating with because keys are signed DP> centrally. Who

Re: Registration File

Greetings Nick! On Thursday, July 27, 2000 at 14:41:07 GMT -0700 (which was 2:41 PM where you think I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: NA> I have to reformat my HDD because of a pesky Registry problem I can't NA> seem to get rid of. I know about the two Registry keys to save all my TB NA> data

Re[3]: bug?

APMJ> Sure, when I'm dialed in from home I could dig through the work Account APMJ> Properties tree to uncheck the option for periodic checking, but why should APMJ> the UI punish me this way? Hopefully, version 2's toolbar customization APMJ> will let me bring something like this out to the UI, b

Re[2]: Before I open a suggestion on this...

Greetings Tony! On Thursday, July 27, 2000 at 10:26:54 GMT +0100 (which was 2:26 AM where you think I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: TB> This message: 27/07/2000 10:24 GMT. TB> Hello Curtis, TB> On 27 July 2000 at 18:45:00 GMT -0500 (which was 00:45 where I live) TB> Curtis ([EMAIL PROTECTE

Re[2]: Before I open a suggestion on this...

Greetings Marck! On Wednesday, July 26, 2000 at 01:28:57 GMT +0100 (which was 5:28 PM where you think I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: MDP> Hi Tony, MDP> On 27 July 2000 at 00:26:53 GMT +0100 (which was 00:26 where I MDP> live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject MD

Re[2]: Before I open a suggestion on this...

Greetings Tony! On Wednesday, July 26, 2000 at 00:26:53 GMT +0100 (which was 4:26 PM where you think I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: TB> This message: 27/07/2000 00:25 GMT. TB> Hello Steve, TB> On 26 July 2000 at 15:50:08 GMT -0700 (which was 23:50 where I live) TB> Steve ([EMAIL PROTECTED

Re[3]: Before I open a suggestion on this...

Greetings Mark! On Wednesday, July 26, 2000 at 22:43:44 GMT +0100 (which was 2:43 PM where you think I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: MRH> Curtis, MRH> Regarding your message dated: Wednesday, July 26, 2000... C>> I agree 200%. Finally!!, someone else brings up this practical C>> concern.

Re[2]: Socks proxies and TB!

>> TB! can be run through a Win9x TCP/IP network and connect to a >> remote POP3 server through a socks proxy. All you need is SocksCap32. >> Unfortuantely I can't remembe rthe exact url. It is freeware howver >> and if anyone wants a copy I'll upload it to my ftp server. Just mail >> me off lis

Re[2]: Mail notification. <-- I'm Stealing this for my TB tagline list! Say goodbye, or hello

That is getting added to my list of taglines! I'm sorry, it's getting stolen right now! Just wanted to tell ya. ... That's the only good thing you can say about Eudora: you like the *mail notification sound*? THE BAT RULES!! :-) -- ... A day without sunshine is like a night without The B

Re[2]: Sorting Filters

Greetings Nick! On Sunday, July 23, 2000 at 17:11:16 GMT -0700 (which was 5:11 PM where you think I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: NA> On Sunday, July 23, 2000, 4:10:52 PM, Januk Aggarwal wrote: JA>> So what you want to set up is a Outgoing JA>> mail filter. You could look for all messages

Re: Mail notification.

Greetings Tony! On Sunday, July 23, 2000 at 20:55:57 GMT +0100 (which was 12:55 PM where you think I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: TB> Hello TBUDL, TB> I'm probably going to be flamed rotten for this but here goes... TB> I downloaded Eudora 4.3.2 just to a have a play now that the S/M

Re: Newbie question re: actions

Greetings Arnie! On Sunday, July 23, 2000 at 15:15:59 GMT -0400 (which was 12:15 PM where you think I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: A> Hello TBUDL, A> Just registered TB having decided it (with a few limitations) to be a A> wonderful email client. My question regards triggering action

Re: FreeStuff

Greetings Mark! On Saturday, May 27, 2000 at 12:44:01 GMT +0100 (which was 4:44 AM where you think I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: MRH> Hi Mark, MRH> http://www.bahlsen.co.uk/try.htm MRH> Bahlsen MRH> http://www.myfreeld.com/download.html MRH> Free Telecom offers... MRH> Cheers, MR

Re[2]: "Corrupt" TBI file -- should I use a backup?

MDP> of ""Corrupt" TBI file -- should I use a backup?": DH And the Flagging, color groups, memos, ... are lost!? MDP>>> It shouldn't be. The TBI files are only the indexes to the mail-base. MDP>>> They speed up access to the TBB data content. The TBB files are where MDP>>> the actual data

Re[2]: Fwd: The Bat 1.44 registered code

Greetings Roel! On Tuesday, July 18, 2000 at 00:49:20 GMT +0200 (which was 3:49 PM where you think I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: CM>> No one has asked me to commit any crimes [yet] ... I feel so left out. CM>> )-; R> oh please please please send me your registration-code... R> feeling better a

Re[3]: Newbie questions

On Thursday, July 13, 2000 at 21:23:19 GMT -0500 (which was 7:23 PM where you think I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: K> Is there some list of the new or different features? Search, or View the TBBETA archive HERE: To Subscribe to TBBETA, double-click HERE:

Re: Help With Templates Please :o)

Greetings Nick! Although I can't tell you what your doing wrong, you MAY want to check your pgp keys, since I clicked on the mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendPGPKey it looks like your sending the key[s] okay, cept one of the keys is corrupted, The Bat pop's up a window saying, "The Keyring

Re[2]: win95->98 problems

Greetings octave! On Wednesday, June 21, 2000 at 20:17:55 GMT +0200 (which was 11:17 AM where you think I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: ok> Hi, >> The problem is, TB stores a lot of its configuration in the Windows >> Registry. >> >> If you still have your old PC around, save the RIT_Labs

Re[2]: filter problem

Greetings Marek! On Tuesday, June 13, 2000 at 17:52:55 GMT +0200 (which was 8:52 AM where you think I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: MM> Hello all, MM> Tuesday, June 13, 2000, Larry Barrett wrote: >> I would certainly be grateful for any suggestions. I might add that I >> use this same fi

Re[2]: Visual Basic Scripting

Greetings Nick! On Tuesday, June 06, 2000 at 22:41:06 GMT -0700 (which was 10:41 PM where you think I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: NA> On Tuesday, June 06, 2000, 7:02:54 PM, Thomas Fernandez wrote: PF>>> In the wake of the current virus alerts such as L*oveB*ug, I would PF>>> like to

Re[3]: Folder Properties

Greetings SyP! On Thursday, June 01, 2000 at 21:48:09 GMT +0200 (which was 12:48 PM where you think I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: KC>> Thanks SyP, that did the trick. TB! Thy Bat. Thanks SyP, that did the trick. Ha hah I am so wrapped at the moment. heh . Yeah!!! IT . it. It's . it's a

Re[2]: Resend/Edit

Greetings Thomas! On Wednesday, May 31, 2000 at 22:39:29 GMT +0800 (which was 7:39 AM where you think I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: SL>> Here's a hint, you don't need to reboot to plug the ethernet SL>> cable back in. :P TF> That's correct. I just need to squeeze under my table, get behind T

Re[2]: PGP signing question.

the p>> shareware programs that get cracked because of that belief. NA> But Phil, that really isn't a fair comparison. The complexities of the NA> examples you cite, differ greatly, and it's the very nature of the NA> complexity of PGP Code that brings the value of Open Source i

Re[2]: PGP signing question.

Greetings Nick! On Sunday, May 28, 2000 at 10:10:20 GMT -0700 (which was 10:10 AM where you think I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: NA> U... I don't think you can "dismiss such claims" based solely on the NA> Open Source Code. Remember, one point of the argument _for_ obscurity, is NA> that w

Re[2]: Change DUN connection for International Roaming with Laptop

Greetings Thomas! On Sunday, May 28, 2000 at 00:27:26 GMT +0800 (which was 9:27 AM where you think I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: TF> Hallo TBUDL, TF> anybody got an idea how to use another DUN connection? TF> On Sat, 27 May 2000 17:33:39 +0800 GMT (27.05.2000, 17:33 +0800 GMT), TF> Thom

Re[2]: PGP signing question.

Greetings Nick! On Saturday, May 27, 2000 at 23:06:07 GMT -0700 (which was 11:06 PM where you think I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: p>>> Technically if you want to get down and say that, then I've always p>>> heard that the older the version of pgp (ie. 2.x) are harder to p>>> crack than the new

Re[2]: PGP signing question.

Greetings Nick! On Saturday, May 27, 2000 at 18:05:08 GMT -0700 (which was 6:05 PM where you think I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: NA> The latest freeware version of PGP is 6.5.3, and PGP Desktop Security 7.0 NA> has already been released, although the freeware version has not. There is NA> no

Re[2]: Hiding folders

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Greetings tracer! On Friday, May 19, 2000 at 07:33:41 GMT +0700 (which was 5:33 PM where you think I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] yelped out about: VDE I just thought that an option would be nice to hide a set of folders VDE ... e. g. I rather sel

Re[2]: The Bat! - bug report - Message Truncated after =00

Greetings Marck! On Tuesday, May 23, 2000 at 10:28:55 GMT +0100 (which was 2:28 AM where you think I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: >> What, then, is going to be trunctated? :) MDP> 'C' programs know nothing of EOL /n characters. Streams know something MDP> of them ... if streams are being us

Re[2]: The Bat! - bug report - Message Truncated after =00

Greetings Marck! On Tuesday, May 23, 2000 at 10:28:55 GMT +0100 (which was 2:28 AM where you think I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: >> What, then, is going to be trunctated? :) MDP> 'C' programs know nothing of EOL /n characters. Streams know something MDP> of them ... if streams are being us

Re: Fwd: Re: Graphics?

Greetings Lawrence! On Friday, May 19, 2000 at 00:03:21 GMT -0400 (which was 9:03 PM where you think I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: LK> I am one who likes it that way. Let's face it, it's auto-retrieval and LK> the associated executions that allowed such exploits as the Love Bug. LK> Okay,

Re[2]: Hiding folders

Greetings Thomas! On Friday, May 19, 2000 at 22:25:55 GMT +0200 (which was 1:25 PM where you think I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: TS> Hello Vincent, TS> on 21:43 you wrote: VDE>> Hi Co-Batties, VDE>> I just thought that an option would be nice to hide a set of folders VDE>> ... e. g. I r

Re[2]: Hiding folders

Greetings Thomas! On Friday, May 19, 2000 at 22:25:55 GMT +0200 (which was 1:25 PM where you think I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: TS> Hello Vincent, TS> on 21:43 you wrote: VDE>> Hi Co-Batties, VDE>> I just thought that an option would be nice to hide a set of folders VDE>> ... e. g. I r

Re[3]: Repeated attempts to connect

Greetings Eberhard! On Wednesday, May 17, 2000 at 08:06:33 GMT +0200 (which was 11:06 PM where you think I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: EH> Hello phil, EH> Thursday, May 18, 2000, 3:36:10 AM, you wrote: EH>>> I have a problem with the dial-up. Sometimes it happens

Re[2]: TB! deficiency

Greetings Tom! On Wednesday, May 17, 2000 at 19:05:44 GMT -0700 (which was 7:05 PM where you think I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: p>>I'm thinking that is an NT /98 microsoft p>> networking share shortcoming. TP> Nope, the fact that browsing to the location is required, since the TP> brows

Re: Repeated attempts to connect

Greetings Eberhard! On Wednesday, May 17, 2000 at 21:48:18 GMT +0200 (which was 12:48 PM where you think I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: EH> Hello TBUDL, EH> I have a problem with the dial-up. Sometimes it happens that I press EH> Alt-F2 accidentally. So TB! tries to dial up, which I w

Re: TB! deficiency

"="I:\\Z\\SendTo\\The Bat!.LNK" "Working Directory"="I:\\MAIL\\" <---I think this is the one you want "Address Book file"="I:\\MAIL\\The_Bat!.ABK" "Last save path"="J:\\TB\\" "Last attach path"="I:\\"

Re: a wish

Greetings Daniel! On Wednesday, May 17, 2000 at 20:05:42 GMT +0200 (which was 11:05 AM where you think I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: DS> I do not wish to start a new flame war around the much debated built-in DS> editor, but may I suggest to allow the use of an external editor. DS> Pmmai

Re[2]: 8 Bit vs 7 Bit Encoding?

Greetings Nick! On Wednesday, May 17, 2000 at 08:35:11 GMT -0700 (which was 8:35 AM where you think I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: NA> On Wednesday, May 17, 2000, 8:22:25 AM, phil wrote: >> Do you sign the keys after you import them? If not, then they will >> look Inva

Re[2]: 8 Bit vs 7 Bit Encoding?

Greetings Nick! On Wednesday, May 17, 2000 at 08:04:02 GMT -0700 (which was 8:04 AM where you think I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: NA> On Tuesday, May 16, 2000, 12:38:56 PM, Peter Steiner wrote: >> It could be that one mail server on the way silently converts the >> encoding of the sent m

Re[3]: Sending a message from the search utility

Greetings phil! On Wednesday, May 17, 2000 at 07:23:36 GMT -0700 (which was 7:23 AM where you think I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: p> Greetings phil! p> On Wednesday, May 17, 2000 at 06:39:39 GMT -0700 (which was 6:39 AM where you think I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: Okay

Re[2]: Sending a message from the search utility

Greetings phil! On Wednesday, May 17, 2000 at 06:39:39 GMT -0700 (which was 6:39 AM where you think I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: p> Greetings Allie! p> On Wednesday, May 17, 2000 at 07:34:01 GMT -0500 (which was 5:34 AM where you think I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] yelped out

Re[2]: Sending a message from the search utility

Greetings phil! On Wednesday, May 17, 2000 at 06:39:39 GMT -0700 (which was 6:39 AM where you think I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: p> Greetings Allie! p> On Wednesday, May 17, 2000 at 07:34:01 GMT -0500 (which was 5:34 AM where you think I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] yelped out

PGP KEYS DH/DSS 4096/1024

Greetings phil! On Wednesday, May 17, 2000 at 06:39:39 GMT -0700 (which was 6:39 AM where you think I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: p> Greetings Allie! p> On Wednesday, May 17, 2000 at 07:34:01 GMT -0500 (which was 5:34 AM where you think I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] yelped out

PGP KEY RSA 2048

Greetings phil! On Wednesday, May 17, 2000 at 06:39:39 GMT -0700 (which was 6:39 AM where you think I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: p> Greetings Allie! p> On Wednesday, May 17, 2000 at 07:34:01 GMT -0500 (which was 5:34 AM where you think I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] yelped out

Re: Sending a message from the search utility

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Greetings Allie! On Wednesday, May 17, 2000 at 07:34:01 GMT -0500 (which was 5:34 AM where you think I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] yelped out about: AM> Hi, AM> Has anyone tried forwarding a message from the search utility? I just AM> tried and I c

Re[2]: No Subject warning

Greetings Marck! On Tuesday, May 16, 2000 at 09:27:13 GMT +0100 (which was 1:27 AM where you think I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: MDP> Hi phil, MDP> On 16 May 2000 at 00:57:31 GMT -0700 (which was 08:57 where I MDP> live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the su

Re[2]: Subject line warnings

Greetings Marck! On Tuesday, May 16, 2000 at 09:24:45 GMT +0100 (which was 1:24 AM where you think I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: MDP> Hi phil, MDP> On 16 May 2000 at 00:54:31 GMT -0700 (which was 08:54 where I MDP> live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the su

Re: SOT: Options and user control

Greetings Tom! To my knowledge TB is written in Delphi, if asked I'd say Delphi. The Newbie isn't going to send out an unusually high amount of no subject messages, or WE WOULD HAVE A HIGHER RATIO THAN 6 in 100 Automatically, Putting %ME into the SUBJECT LINE is NOT RFC COMPLIANT! It's a sof

Re[2]: No Subject warning

Greetings John! Well the Good Net Keeping Seal of Approval, does not set the internet Standards, the RFC's do. Which if you look up RFC 822, you see that the Subject is treated as a TEXT STRING. And to FORCE your BS on my MESSAGE is not what the RFC's SAY. The GNKSA is the BS-DOO-DOO-GNKSA as far

Re[2]: No Subject warning

Greetings Jast! On Monday, May 15, 2000 at 07:13:04 GMT +0200 (which was 10:13 PM where you think I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: J> Morning John De Hoog, >> Ordinary users don't oppose it. Ritlabs needs to listen to ordinary >> users, else it will find itself with a shrinking piece of a g

Re[2]: No Subject warning

/PERSONAL . Ask Stef. No need to play dirty tricks. The truth will set you free. READY_ On Monday, May 15, 2000 at 11:51:06 GMT +0900 (which was 7:51 PM where you think I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: JDH> phil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>TP> User configurability is the

Re[2]: Subject line warnings

homey the clown. Neither is a nagging-pop-up when it's MY OPTION (as per RFC 822) to leave that field blank. On Monday, May 15, 2000 at 20:22:19 GMT -0700 (which was 8:22 PM where you think I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: JA> Hello phil, JA> On Monday, May 15, 2000 at 19:5

Re: Subject line warnings

Greetings John! I have 870 messages in TBUDL and not one of them is lacking a SUBJECT. So, I don't see where your getting your statistics from. Sounds like an ABC poll to me. Where's the facts? Also in TBBETA I have 1660 messages and not one is lacking a Subject line. Where's the facts, real

Re[2]: Numbering of Replys "(RE:[2])"

could change the Server like you can with the email accounts. I've had to use other servers for something that disappeared. And adding NNTP servers are a pain in the arse. TP> Anyhow, adding pop up windows with one checkbox and some text and a TP> yes/no button selection does NOT a

Re[2]: Numbering of Replys "(RE:[2])"

Greetings Tom! You know, sometimes, I write mail with no subject. And I know in "other mailers" there is an "Yo, You got No Subject" Button Warning /Ok. I never liked it. I'd rather have "no warning" "No pop-up" It's just another pop-up screen to slow you down. I been fighting to get rid of

  1   2   >