Signature.asc attachment file

Can I ask please, why is it that Jakob's PGP signature comes as an attachment file (signature.asc)- rather than inline as do Marck's, Allie's etc? I've not seen these .asc files before so would be interested to know more about them. Thanks! -- Cheers, Anne Using The B

Re: No attachment for cc'ed email address

ON Tuesday, October 22, 2002, 5:59:32 PM, you wrote: TF> Just watch the filter rules so that the filter isn't recursive; I TF> think your customer would be annoyed after all if he received the TF> forwarded message, then a forward of the forward, then a forward of TF> the forward of the forward..

Re: No attachment for cc'ed email address

Hello Gerard, On Tue, 22 Oct 2002 16:26:58 +0200 GMT (22/10/02, 21:26 +0700 GMT), Gerard wrote: > I knew that, but I am also using TB! for a while now to know that I > can do things outside the rules. No, you can't. But TB has so many features, that many things are possible, within the framework

Re: No attachment for cc'ed email address

ON Tuesday, October 22, 2002, 2:12:31 PM, you wrote: PP> It's impossible to 'CC' somebody and not having the attachment sent to PP> him/her as well as to all other recipients. PP> The Mail protocol does not allow this kind of special function, a CC PP> (Carbon Copy) is

Re: No attachment for cc'ed email address

; this and though it will send a copy to the other party, the ACM> attachments are also sent despite having the option not to send ACM> attachments checked. I never saw or used that option. The "do not send attachment" option only becomes visible after you select that option. To bad

Re: No attachment for cc'ed email address

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In , Gerard [G] wrote:' G> The subject might be a bit cryptic but this is the case. I sent G> emails for my company and someone needs to be cc'ed on some of G> these mails but doesn't want to receive any a

Re: No attachment for cc'ed email address

Hi Gerard, On Tue, 22 Oct 2002 09:00:23 +0200 Gerard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I sent emails for my company and someone needs to be cc'ed on some of > these mails but doesn't want to receive any attachements. It's impossible to 'CC' somebody and not hav

No attachment for cc'ed email address

Hi Bat Users, The subject might be a bit cryptic but this is the case. I sent emails for my company and someone needs to be cc'ed on some of these mails but doesn't want to receive any attachements. I would like, if possible, to automate this process to prevent forgetting it every now and then. P

Re: Attachment problem

Hello Mark On Friday, September 20, 2002, you wrote > Elaine- > There was a long-running thread about this recently. From your > symptoms my guess is that the jpg image has an unmatched end-of-line > character in it. This is something that graphics programs are adept at > dealing with but The B

Re: Attachment problem

Elaine- There was a long-running thread about this recently. From your symptoms my guess is that the jpg image has an unmatched end-of-line character in it. This is something that graphics programs are adept at dealing with but The Bat can't handle. There's no real "fix" for it, as the image itse

Re[2]: Attachment problem

Hello ETM, Friday, September 20, 2002, 3:17:57 AM, in a galaxy far, far away, ETM wrote: E> I just played around some more and saved it as a gif and it now E> appears in a test email. Does someone know what is happening E> here? It appears that most better viewers will actually TEST the file a

Re: Attachment problem

> Hello Thomas > On Friday, September 20, 2002, you wrote >> You have a message with that attachment (which won't open) on your >> computer (maybe in the Sent folder). Take that message and Forward it >> to yourself. Let us know whether the attachment can be opene

Re: Attachment problem

Hello Thomas On Friday, September 20, 2002, you wrote > You have a message with that attachment (which won't open) on your > computer (maybe in the Sent folder). Take that message and Forward it > to yourself. Let us know whether the attachment can be opened with the > inter

Re: Attachment problem

Hello ETM, On Fri, 20 Sep 2002 03:42:19 -0400 GMT (20/09/02, 14:42 +0700 GMT), ETM wrote: E> I am waiting until daylight for them to try to open it . E> However, when I attempted again to send that jpg with an email the E> error again comes up. You have a message with that attachme

Re: Attachment problem

Hello Gerard On Friday, September 20, 2002, you wrote > Hi ETM, >There are basically two possibilities: >1- The attachement is damaged and the internal viewer repors the >error and will not show anything of the picture >2- The format of this JPG is supported by the external but n

Re: Attachment problem

ON Friday, September 20, 2002, 8:20:22 AM, you wrote: E> I am receiving an error, JPG err#53, when attempting to open an E> attachment that I created and sent to others and then to myself E> as a test after I received the error when checking the sent copy. E> The jpg opens fine on

Re: Attachment problem

Hello ETM! On Friday, September 20, 2002 at 8:20:22 AM you wrote: > Can someone tell me what has happened here? There has been a thread recently about that, I think on TBBETA. -- Dierk Haasis http://www.Write4U.de http://Zoo.Write4U.de PGP keys available: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=Se

Attachment problem

I am receiving an error, JPG err#53, when attempting to open an attachment that I created and sent to others and then to myself as a test after I received the error when checking the sent copy. The jpg opens fine on the desktop when saved. However, this is the first time I have not been able to

Re: Inconsistent File attachment macro?

Hello Marck, On Wed, 14 Aug 2002, at 01:38:15 GMT +0100 (8/13/02, 7:38 PM -0500 GMT here), you wrote in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: MDP> Whenever anything like this happens to me I go scurrying off looking MDP> round the AB for an alternative entry for the address that isn't MDP>

Re: Inconsistent File attachment macro?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Greg, @13-Aug-2002, 15:16 -0500 (21:16 UK time) Greg Strong [GS] in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to TBUDL: GS> I am using a macro to attach files to email created with a quick GS> template. Most of the time it works, but most of

Inconsistent File attachment macro?

Hello TBUDL, I am using a macro to attach files to email created with a quick template. Most of the time it works, but most of the time the first email created with the mass mailing feature does NOT have the files attached even though the files exist. BTW in this case the "mass mailing" is kind o

Re: The defualt file extension in Attachment Save Dialog

Hello Peter, On Fri, 9 Aug 2002 12:49:06 +0200 GMT (2002/8/9, 17:49 +0700 GMT), Peter Palmreuther wrote: TF>> However, I now have the month in numbers but want it in words (in TF>> English). I guess that's not possible with my Windows setting to TF>> Chinese. PP> Simply give it a try: change 'm

Re: The defualt file extension in Attachment Save Dialog

Hello Syafril, On Fri, 9 Aug 2002 12:59:31 +0700 GMT (2002/8/9, 12:59 +0700 GMT), Syafril Hermansyah wrote: >> Does anybody know how I can set the language in the message list other >> than with the Regional setting? After all, my reply RegEx still works >> fine with English months (see above).

Re: The defualt file extension in Attachment Save Dialog

Hello Thomas, in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] was written: TF> However, I now have the month in numbers but want it in words (in TF> English). I guess that's not possible with my Windows setting to TF> Chinese. Simply give it a try: change 'mm' to 'mmm' or ''. But I guess this w

Re: The defualt file extension in Attachment Save Dialog

Hello Anthony, On Fri, 9 Aug 2002 00:04:59 -0700 GMT (2002/8/9, 14:04 +0700 GMT), Anthony Xin Chen wrote: AXC> See Date/Time format specifier in Help for how to set it up. AXC> I changed it to the following, standard American date format. Thanks, that helps (I set it to the European standard).

Re: The defualt file extension in Attachment Save Dialog

Hello Thomas, in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] was written: TF> Can anybody else who is not using traditional Chinese confirm this, be TF> it double-byte or single-byte languages? I'm sorry, I can't. I'm using an English W2K with set to German locales where ever this is possible (on

Re: The defualt file extension in Attachment Save Dialog

Hello Thomas, On 9 Aug 2002 12:47:06 (my local time 8 ¤K¤ë 2002 22:47:06), Thomas F. wrote (in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) > Does anybody know how I can set the language in the message list other > than with the Regional setting? After all, my reply RegEx still works > fine with

Re: The defualt file extension in Attachment Save Dialog

On Fri, 9 Aug 2002 12:47:06 +0700 "Thomas F." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ... > Does anybody know how I can set the language in the message list other > than with the Regional setting? After all, my reply RegEx still works > fine with English months (see above). Add "en" after the %macro name, fo

Re: The defualt file extension in Attachment Save Dialog

Hello Anthony, On Fri, 9 Aug 2002 12:02:23 +0700 GMT (2002/8/9, 12:02 +0700 GMT), Thomas F. wrote: TF> I can fully confirm this! I have set my region to Chinese (Taiwan), TF> and now the attachment default file is "*.*". You have saved my life! TF> (Well, not quite, but you

Re: The defualt file extension in Attachment Save Dialog

sh (US) from Control AXC> Panel/Region/General Tab/Region. OK, mine was set to English (UK). AXC> The problem goes away whenever I set the region to Chinese Traditional AXC> Chinese. I can fully confirm this! I have set my region to Chinese (Taiwan), and now the attachment default fil

Re: The defualt file extension in Attachment Save Dialog

Hello Thomas, I find out what the cause is. My OS is Win2K Traditional Chinese version with Service Pack 2. The problem occurs whenever I set the region to English (US) from Control Panel/Region/General Tab/Region. The problem goes away whenever I set the region to Chinese Traditional Chinese

Templates do not work if attachment

If I use: --> Specials --> Alternative Forward (which I use to forward HTML messages that get destroyed by normal forwards) or use another application and click send as attachment (which I presume uses MAPI), my address book templates do not work and sometimes the From and Re

Re: updating Bat attachment locations when chaning HD folders?

use for inserting attachment names: ===== Attachment(s): <<%ATTACHMENTS>> **All attachments virus-checked before sending** = Julian -- Using The Bat! v1.60

Re: updating Bat attachment locations when chaning HD folders?

Hello Charlie, On Mon, 3 Jun 2002 11:34:47 +1000GMT (3-6-02, 3:34 +0200GMT, where I live), you wrote: CL> is there some macro or something that would at least automagically do CL> a text-insert of the name & extension of any attachments onto the end CL> of the message? %ATTACHMENTS Remember th

Re: Saving attachment

On Tuesday, May 28, 2002, 01:54, Anthony Xin Chen wrote: > Is there a way to stop TB to assign ".z" as default file extension > when saving attachement? Sounds like ZoneAlarm. By default, it changes some file extensions to .z?? when mails arive. If you are using ZA, try shutting this feature

Re: Saving attachment

On Tuesday, May 28, 2002, 01:54, Anthony Xin Chen wrote: > Is there a way to stop TB to assign ".z" as default file extension > when saving attachement? Sounds like ZoneAlarm. By default, it changes some file extensions to .z?? when mails arive. If you are using ZA, try shutting this feature

Re: Saving attachment

Hello Jonathan, On Mon, 27 May 2002 23:01:41 -0500 GMT (28/05/02, 11:01 +0700 GMT), Jonathan Angliss wrote: >> I have the same problem, but I cannot find Folder Options / File >> Types. Is this in the TB main window? JA> I think he meant it as a windows setting. Load up Explorer, go JA> through

Re: Saving attachment

Hi Thomas, On Tue, 28 May 2002 10:27:02 +0700, you wrote: > MDP> Yes! Fix your file associations. TB is only doing what the default > MDP> file association for the file type says to do. You can look in Folder > MDP> Options / File type and check there what the .z is all about and why > MDP> it is

Re: Saving attachment

Hello Marck, On Tue, 28 May 2002 01:19:34 +0100 GMT (28/05/02, 07:19 +0700 GMT), Marck D Pearlstone wrote: >> Is there a way to stop TB to assign ".z" as default file extension >> when saving attachement? MDP> Yes! Fix your file associations. TB is only doing what the default MDP> file associat

Re: Saving attachment

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Anthony, @28 May 2002, 16:54:12 -0700 (00:54 UK time) Anthony Xin Chen wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Is there a way to stop TB to assign ".z" as default file extension > when saving attachement? Yes! Fix your file associati

Saving attachment

Hello All, Is there a way to stop TB to assign ".z" as default file extension when saving attachement? -- Regards, Anthony Current Ver: 1.60m FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives

Re[2]: Best Practices: Attachment Filters

ra careful if possible. So, if an e-mail has an attachment with "foo" extensions, then I'd prefer TB not even download the message. Here's the environment: - Anti-Virus is installed and updated nightly. - There is no e-mail server other than the POP3 server that is part of a

Re: Best Practices: Attachment Filters

On Tuesday, May 14, 2002, Michael T. Ashby wrote... > My questions are: > 1. Can this be done? Stripping attachments is a pain, and I'm not sure TB! can do it. Although if you have access to the mail server, and it is running procmail, you could force it to mangle the extension, so i

Re: Opening Word Attachment

Hello Raj, On Sat, 13 Apr 2002 19:41:57 +0530GMT (13-4-02, 16:11 +0200GMT, where I live), you wrote: R> The first time I open an attachment word open and is the foreground R> (or active) window. However after that whenever I open a word R> attachment then its never the active window.

Opening Word Attachment

Fellow TB users, I have been observing a peculiar problem in opening word attachments (I am not sure if it exists with others). The first time I open an attachment word open and is the foreground (or active) window. However after that whenever I open a word attachment then its never the

attachment size

Hello tbudl, just a wish: I would like to be able to see attachment file size in message view window (as it is possible while composing a message with attachments). Regards, Oleg Using The Bat! v1.60d on Windows 98 4.10 Build A

Attachment riddle

port powerpoint presentation to these freemail addresses, which of course bounce because they don't allow messages of that magnitude. Consistently these bounces, which include the original message copied into them below the error message, appear in The Bat! as an empty message with a sing

Re[2]: Attachment in The Bat! auto-response message

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Allie, Wednesday, March 20, 2002, 3:22:21 AM, you wrote: ACM> The macro to use is %Attachfile and not %Attachment Yes, of course. Sorry for confusion. I had just misspelled it in my message. ACM> When creating the reply template, h

Re: Attachment in The Bat! auto-response message

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 19 Mar 2002 22:11:21 +0200, Robert Golovniov [RG] wrote these comments: ... RG> I've been experimenting for a while trying to add attachment to an RG> auto-response message that would contain my PGP public key. I've RG>

Attachment in The Bat! auto-response message

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello The Bat! users, Perhaps one more question for today, if you don't mind. I've been experimenting for a while trying to add attachment to an auto-response message that would contain my PGP public key. I've used

Re[2]: Delete a message based on attachment?

Hello Allie, Monday, March 18, 2002, 9:44:10 PM, you wrote: > Is there nothing else common to these messages other than the > attachments. I suppose I could use something more conventional, based on the message headers. Thank you for the information provided. -- Best regards, C

Re: Delete a message based on attachment?

concerned. CP> Therefore, is it possible to delete an incoming message, based on CP> the name of a file being sent with it as an attachment? AFAIK, no. TB! would have to be able to examine the complete message source including the attachment blocks to do this. Currently, TB! doesn't do this

Delete a message based on attachment?

I'm being plagued by messages being sent to me with a virus attached to them and I would like to automatically delete the messages concerned. Therefore, is it possible to delete an incoming message, based on the name of a file being sent with it as an attachment? -- Best re

Re: Attachment icons

@ 17:35:52 -0500 [ Wed, 13 Mar 2002], David Denton [DD] contributed this to our collective wisdom: ... DD> In the attachment pane of the main TB! screen, I see only icons for DD> each attachment. Most often, I am unable to see the entire file name DD> or the extension unless I cli

Attachment icons

Dear fellow TB! users, In the attachment pane of the main TB! screen, I see only icons for each attachment. Most often, I am unable to see the entire file name or the extension unless I click on the particular attachment icon, and there is no indication of how large any attachment is. I find

Re[2]: Attachment handling

Although I suggested to the original poster that, for his purposes, he might store attachments externally, I store mine internally. I do that for several reasons: security (Eudora's Qualcomm used to recommend it, perhaps still do, for security reasons); housekeeping to avoid unneeded attachments

Re: Wish list (was: Microsoft attachment)

Hello Marck! On Saturday, February 9, 2002 at 3:05:08 AM you wrote: > No there wasn't. It was as simple as 'o' and TAB (which, on the second > line, lines up with the indent on the first, etc.). Smart Tabs enabled.* *We will run into trouble shortly: Smart Tab, SmartBat, SmartPad - anythyng a

Re: Wish list (was: Microsoft attachment)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Rick, On 08 February 2002 at 13:46:48 -0500 (which was 18:46 where I live) Rick Reumann wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> reply text here > That is really cool, and I like it much better than how I was doing it > where I

Re[3]: Wish list (was: Microsoft attachment)

Hello Jonathan, 08. februar 2002, 22:28:31, you wrote: JW> TB's Shift-F7 and Ctrl-F7 are like nothing else I've seen. I find JW> them quite awkward (in general I prefer one handed keyboard short JW> cuts.) Look at Norton Commander's (and it's clones') editor :) JW> 2) Reformatting a paragraph

Re: Wish list (was: Microsoft attachment)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Rick, On 08 February 2002 at 11:31:39 -0500 (which was 16:31 where I live) Rick Reumann wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Secnario II - Auto-Format On. > Well now when I go back and add text things wrap fine, so > ev

Re[3]: Wish list (was: Microsoft attachment)

Hello Rick, 08. februar 2002, 19:46:48, you wrote: >>> reply text here RR> That is really cool, and I like it much better than how I was doing it RR> where I would simply indent my response under the blocks of reply RR> text. Your way looks much more clear. This happened because your orig

Re: Wish list (was: Microsoft attachment)

Hello Jonathan! On Friday, February 8, 2002 at 5:00:16 PM you wrote: > Use a high end editor (like Multi Edit, Slick Edit, etc) and see if you feel the > same way! The number one feature that distinguishes these are _configurability_ > (keymapping, toolbar, etc) although TB wouldn't the need ex

Re[2]: Wish list (was: Microsoft attachment)

Thanks Marck, your explanations are really helping me better understand this ( even though I'm not totally getting the whole line return thing, but that's just my ignorance, I'll work on understanding it better ). Totally not related to the topic, but Marck, did you modify your reply template to

Re: Wish list (was: Microsoft attachment)

Hello Gerard! On Friday, February 8, 2002 at 6:50:04 PM you wrote: Mary>> 3. Please could somebody do something about TB's incredibly primitive Mary>> text editor? > You better stand back and take cover :( Another of the good tips to follow: Look for the word "editor" in the archives:

Re: Microsoft attachment

f compression? MDP> No - it's just a Microsoft proprietary attachment encoding method. MDP> MS to MS, it works fine. MS to anyone else? 3rd party decoder needed. Not MS to MS, OE (a real MS product) has problems with those atta

Re: Wish list (was: Microsoft attachment)

ON Friday, February 08, 2002, 3:09:37 PM, you wrote: Mary> 3. Please could somebody do something about TB's incredibly primitive Mary> text editor? You better stand back and take cover :( Mary> Otherwise, I really like it :-) To late now ;-) -- Best regards, Gerard Insert Cookie Here--

Re: Microsoft attachment

el spreadsheet. Why isn't it sent as an excel spreadsheet. > Is it some form of compression? No - it's just a Microsoft proprietary attachment encoding method. MS to MS, it works fine. MS to anyone else? 3rd party decoder needed. - -- Cheers -- .\\arck D. P

Re[2]: Wish list (was: Microsoft attachment)

AS> I think the problem is that TB!'s editor is deliberately _not_ like AS> other editors in many ways. That doesn't mean that it's wrong, but the AS> ubiquity of Microsoft applications (and copies of the way they do AS> things) exerts enormous hidden pressure to always do things the same AS> way

Re: Wish list (was: Microsoft attachment)

On 08 February 2002 at 4:00 pm Jonathan wrote: > Use a high end editor (like Multi Edit, Slick Edit, etc) and see if you feel the > same way! The number one feature that distinguishes these are _configurability_ > (keymapping, toolbar, etc) although TB wouldn't the need extension-specific > conf

Re[3]: Wish list (was: Microsoft attachment)

Use a high end editor (like Multi Edit, Slick Edit, etc) and see if you feel the same way! The number one feature that distinguishes these are _configurability_ (keymapping, toolbar, etc) although TB wouldn't the need extension-specific configuration. TB is actually pretty good, but it would be

Re: Wish list (was: Microsoft attachment)

On Friday, February 08, 2002, at 16:09:37, Mary wrote about: Wish list (was: Microsoft attachment) >> I have a shortcut to fentun in a desktop folder. The shortcut >> specifies "Start in" the same folder. I save my attachment to that >> folder, open the folde

Re: Wish list (was: Microsoft attachment)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Mary, On 08 February 2002 at 15:48:07 +0100 (which was 14:48 where I live) Mary Cassidy wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > What I meant was that with Netscape and Eudora, for example, if you > write a message and then add bits to

Re: Wish list (was: Microsoft attachment)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi David, On 08 February 2002 at 10:48:25 -0500 (which was 15:48 where I live) David Denton wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >I am finding the TB! editor is growing on me to the point that, >after a month or so of using it,

Re: Wish list (was: Microsoft attachment)

Hello Mary, On Fri, 8 Feb 2002 15:09:37 +0100GMT (8-2-2002, 15:09 +0100GMT, where I live), you wrote: MC> 1. Please can the next version of TB treat attachments just like MC> normal mailreaders do? There is no 'like normal mailreaders do'. Recently somebody posted an attachm

Re[2]: Wish list (was: Microsoft attachment)

Hello Mary, Friday, February 08, 2002, 9:48:07 AM, you wrote: MC> I've given up using autoformat (or was it "justify on wrap"?), because MC> it deletes the paragraph marks, and it's too much trouble to hit enter MC> twice at the end of each paragraph. MC> It may sound like no big deal, but when

Editor [WAS] Wish list (was: Microsoft attachment)

On Friday, February 08, 2002, 9:48:07 AM, Mary wrote: MC> What I meant was that with Netscape and Eudora, for example, if you MC> write a message and then add bits to it, as most people do, the MC> wrapping automatically puts itself right; you don't have to mess about MC> with ALT-L or wade throu

Re: Microsoft attachment

Hello Gerard, On Fri, 8 Feb 2002 at 14:18:19 [GMT +0100] (which was 14:18 where I live) you wrote: GdV> Marck, GdV> I have downloaded the program (fentun.exe -219kb) three times now and when I click GdV> it nothing happened and mean absolutely nothing. You can ... 1) associate .att (o

Re: Microsoft attachment

ON Friday, February 08, 2002, 2:32:18 PM, you wrote: Marck> Okay. It is a drop target. You have to save your attachment and drop Marck> it onto a shortcut to the fentun program. Then a window opens showing Marck> you the names of any attachments within the message.att file and you M

Re: Wish list (was: Microsoft attachment)

Jernej Simončič wrote: > MC> 1. Please can the next version of TB treat attachments just like > MC> normal mailreaders do? > It already does that - normal mail readers don't support MS's > proprietary format. I don't have wide experience of other mailreaders, just Netscape and Eudora, and I'v

Re: Microsoft attachment

Hi, Marck D Pearlstone wrote: > FWIW, PGP/MIME signatures often come through as "ATT" attachments for me > too. I think mutt, a widespread *nix MUA, does this. Regards, Markus -- Using The Bat! 1.54 Beta/37 under Windows NT 4.0 Build 1381 Service Pack 6 -- ___

Re[2]: Wish list (was: Microsoft attachment)

Hello Mary, 08. februar 2002, 15:09:37, you wrote: MC> 1. Please can the next version of TB treat attachments just like MC> normal mailreaders do? It already does that - normal mail readers don't support MS's proprietary format. MC> 3. Please could somebody do something about TB's incredibly p

Re: Wish list (was: Microsoft attachment)

Marck D Pearlstone wrote: > Okay. It is a drop target. You have to save your attachment and drop > it onto a shortcut to the fentun program. Then a window opens showing > you the names of any attachments within the message.att file and you > get the opportunity to extract them.

Re: Microsoft attachment

ick it nothing happened and mean absolutely nothing. Okay. It is a drop target. You have to save your attachment and drop it onto a shortcut to the fentun program. Then a window opens showing you the names of any attachments within the message.att file and you get the opportunity to extract them. I h

Re: Microsoft attachment

ON Friday, February 08, 2002, 1:29:13 PM, you wrote: Marck> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Marck> Hash: SHA1 Marck> Can we close the thread now? Please? (Unless the original poster has Marck> any further questions on the topic and is certain that fentun is *not* Marck> the answer). Marck,

Re: Microsoft attachment

status part of 'attention messages' and are simple > text, it's used for winmail.dat when it contain attachment (size > > 4k). Why does everybody want to argue with me today? I have a friend who constantly sends me attachments as MS-TNEF thingies that need fentun to unbundle them

Re: Microsoft attachment

". It MDP> works on all 32 bit versions of windows... and it *does* work. Yes it work, but not for message.att files that are the message/delivery-status part of 'attention messages' and are simple text, it's used for winmail.dat when it contain attachment

Re: Microsoft attachment

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Markus, On 08 February 2002 at 12:54:09 +0100 (which was 11:54 where I live) Markus Gloede wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > ATT attachments might also be plain text attachments. You get these when > you requested a read receipt

Re: Microsoft attachment

Hi, ATT attachments might also be plain text attachments. You get these when you requested a read receipt. fentun only works with DAT attachments, AFAIK. Regards, Markus -- Using The Bat! 1.54 Beta/37 under Windows NT 4.0 Build 1381 Service Pack 6 -- ___

Re: Microsoft attachment

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Gerard, On 08 February 2002 at 10:08:14 +0100 (which was 09:08 where I live) Gerard de Vries wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Thanks for the suggestion, but apparently it doesn't work under >W2K. I will search the Net fo

Re: Microsoft attachment

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Gerard, On 08 February 2002 at 10:08:14 +0100 (which was 09:08 where I live) Gerard de Vries wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Marck>> The problem is caused by the use of a Micro$oft proprietary attachment Marc

Re: Microsoft attachment

Hello Gerard, On Friday, February 8, 2002 at 10:08:14 AM you wrote in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (at least in part): GdV> btw your sig cutoff mark is incorrect. No, his message was PGP-sigend, and this prepends the '- ' before signature mark to avoid probable misbehaviors by PGP-en/de-crypt rout

Re: Microsoft attachment

hy I know it's a Microsoft attachment, but it is near impossible to figure out what's in it. -- Best regards, Gerard Insert Cookie Here--> % of all statistics are wrong. - Statistics Canada 1985 - Windows 2000 Profess

Re: Microsoft attachment

ON Thursday, February 07, 2002, 9:18:57 PM, you wrote: Marck> The problem is caused by the use of a Micro$oft proprietary attachment Marck> format for Outlook and Exchange users. There is a freeware decoder Marck> called Fentun which you can get from www.fentun.com. Hi Marck, T

Re: Microsoft attachment

Hello Gerard! On Thursday, February 7, 2002 at 8:37:43 PM you wrote: > Is there a way to read this with TB! or an external prg. I never had the inclination to do this, but ... try to open it with a normal text editor like TextPad, it opens everything. If it is not readable you can try a HEX e

Re: Microsoft attachment

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Nick, On 07 February 2002 at 12:39:05 -0800 (which was 20:39 where I live) Nick Andriash wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> The problem is caused by the use of a Micro$oft proprietary attachment > Anyone els

Re: Microsoft attachment

Hello Shahar, On Thursday, February 07 2002 at 12:42 PM PDT, you wrote: > Nick, > So far only one message here. Thanks. One of the Servers along the way must have burped then. ;o) -- Nick Andriash Courtenay, B.C. Canada -- Archives

Re: Microsoft attachment

Nick, So far only one message here. Thank you for writing On Thursday, February 07, 2002, at 22:39:05, Nick wrote about: Microsoft attachment > Anyone else seeing multiple copies of this message? I must have received > 10 of them

Re: Microsoft attachment

Hello Marck D Pearlstone, On Thursday, February 07 2002 at 12:18 PM PDT, you wrote: > The problem is caused by the use of a Micro$oft proprietary attachment Anyone else seeing multiple copies of this message? I must have received 10 of them so far. -- Nick Andriash Courtenay, B.C. Can

Re: Microsoft attachment

he use of a Micro$oft proprietary attachment format for Outlook and Exchange users. There is a freeware decoder called Fentun which you can get from www.fentun.com. - -- Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator ___ \ BrainSt

Microsoft attachment

Hi Bat Users, I some time receive an email with an attachment that has the extension ATT. By looking at it with an editor I can see that this is an MS Outlook file of some sort. Is there a way to read this with TB! or an external prg. -- Best regards, Gerard Insert Cookie Here

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >