Hello Marck D. Pearlstone,
On Fri, 4 Feb 2000 11:54:26 + GMT your local time,
which was Friday, February 04, 2000, 6:54:26 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
AM>> Tracer needs to get a new photo. He's all stretched out there.
It looks better.
> Resize tracer's photo
Hello Allie Martin,
On Fri, 4 Feb 2000 06:26:18 -0500 GMT your local time,
which was Friday, February 04, 2000, 6:26:18 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Allie Martin wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Feb 2000 11:20:07 +, Tony Boom wrote:
>> So where does one find this rogues gallery and how does one submit
This message: 04/02/2000 18:55 GMT.
Friday, February 04, 2000, 3:19:41 PM, Allie wrote:
AM> So, I've noticed. I recognize that photo from your website.
Well it was the only one I had on here at the time. I must scan a new
one though. I don't think my framed mug shot fits in with th
On Fri, Feb 04, 2000 at 06:31:43PM +0300, Alexander V. Kiselev wrote:
> outburst of Steve's -- but nope, nothing of the kind... Steve, have you been
> cured somehow?;-)
Nope, on vacation. :)
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
ICQ: 51073
On Fri, 4 Feb 2000 18:45:04 +0300, Alexander V. Kiselev wrote:
> (BTW, Allie, what did you do with the X-Mailer field???;-))
You're a seton. Check again. :)))
--
CU, Allie ...
Using The Bat! v1.39 *:* Windows NT4.0 (Service Pack 6)
---
** Oxymoron: Sergeant Major. **
--
Hi there!
On 3 Feb 00, at 21:46, Allie Martin wrote
about "Re: If I was creative there would be a good subject here":
> Take for example X-News. I have set it up to display Kludge
> information in the message body using a different font and colour from
> that used
Hi there!
On 3 Feb 00, at 23:04, Paula Ford wrote
about "Re: If I was creative there would be...":
> > OK, you are now unto something. :) Both Agent and X-News have a
> > feature that I think would provide you with your solution. They both
> > allow you to view, in the body of your messages,
Hi there!
On 4 Feb 00, at 15:43, Oleg Zalyalov wrote
about "OT was Re[2]: Message autoview window":
> Friday, February 04, 2000, Steve Lamb wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED] about
> Message autoview window (was Re: If I was creative there would be a good subject
>here):
>
&
On Fri, 4 Feb 2000 03:34:21 -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
> I'd send in a pic but then some people would have to face up to the fact I
> might be human. I dunno if they could handle that. :)
We'll see that you're human, but will we also be able to look at
that SQUID device (or what was it calle
On Fri, 4 Feb 2000 14:20:52 +, Tony Boom wrote:
> Thanks for the info. I've just had a look. That Leif chap is a bit
> quick, I only sent my mug shot a few minutes ago and it's there
> already.
So, I've noticed. I recognize that photo from your website.
> I got
This message: 04/02/2000 14:07 GMT.
Friday, February 04, 2000, 11:26:18 AM, Allie wrote:
AM> Enjoy! I wouldn't mind seeing some more faces there. Tracer needs to
AM> get a new photo. He's all stretched out there
Thanks for the info. I've just had a look. That Leif chap is a bit
qui
This message: 04/02/2000 13:07 GMT.
Friday, February 04, 2000, 11:34:21 AM, you wrote:
SL> I'd send in a pic but then some people would have to face up to the fact I
SL> might be human. I dunno if they could handle that. :)
Well I've just sent in my photo in, so some people are j
Hi Allie,
On 04 February 2000 at 06:26:18 GMT -0500 (which was 11:26 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points:
>> So where does one find this rogues gallery and
AM> http://www.pcwize.com/thebat/rogues.shtml
>> how does one submit a photo?
by e-mail to Leif
Friday, February 04, 2000, 3:43:31 AM, Oleg wrote:
> They will think that you have sent a pic of innocent human eaten by you.
Exactly. "Ah, so that was Steve's last victim."
"What did he do?"
"Didn't follow RFC822."
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your sh
On Fri, 4 Feb 2000 03:34:21 -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
> I'd send in a pic but then some people would have to face up to
> the fact I might be human. I dunno if they could handle that. :)
R..O..T..F..L..M..A..O
*wiping away the tears*. I think I could just manage. :)
--
CU, A
Hello, the Bat! list recipients,
Friday, February 04, 2000, Steve Lamb wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED] about
Message autoview window (was Re: If I was creative there would be a good subject here):
SL> I'd send in a pic but then some people would have to face up to the fact I
SL> mig
On Fri, Feb 04, 2000 at 06:26:18AM -0500, Allie Martin wrote:
> But believe me, it's a real eye opener, especially when some realize
> that I am male. :)))
I'd send in a pic but then some people would have to face up to the fact I
might be human. I dunno if they could handle that. :)
--
On Fri, 4 Feb 2000 11:20:07 +, Tony Boom wrote:
> So where does one find this rogues gallery and how does one submit
> a photo?
http://www.pcwize.com/thebat/rogues.shtml
Enjoy! I wouldn't mind seeing some more faces there. Tracer needs to
get a new photo. He's all stretched out t
This message: 04/02/2000 11:19 GMT.
Hello Allie,
Friday, February 04, 2000, 10:27:50 AM, you wrote:
>> Why? Because
>> following Leif's stroke of brilliance in setting up the rogues
>> gallery site, I now have entries with photos for many members of
>> the list (as well as for my pe
On Fri, 4 Feb 2000 10:59:24 +, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
> Yes - very much so - with one minor correction to the scenario.
> The ticker is unimportant to me as a screen entity. With 50+
> mails arriving every couple of hours, what the ticker has to say
> to me is just about ir
Hi Allie,
On 04 February 2000 at 05:27:50 GMT -0500 (which was 10:27 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points:
>> I keep it open constantly while reviewing mail in my virtual mail
>> folder ... you know, the one behind the ticker ;-).
AM> Hehehehehe. A stranger
On Fri, 4 Feb 2000 10:17:03 +, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
> I see that, but OTOH use the address auto-view a bit differently.
> I keep it open constantly while reviewing mail in my virtual mail
> folder ... you know, the one behind the ticker ;-). Why? Because
> following Leif's stroke
Hi Allie,
On 04 February 2000 at 04:36:43 GMT -0500 (which was 09:36 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points:
AM>The other thing is that again I have to make an appeal for some
AM> consistency in functionality here!! If I have the message
AM> autoview/preview
On Thu, 3 Feb 2000 23:06:38 -0800, Januk Aggarwal wrote:
>> Did you try address auto-view? Ctrl-Shift-O.
> Well, that is better than the Kludges, so thank you. But it is still
> not as convenient as it could be. Now if we could dock that toolbar
> on the window somewhere, that might do the tri
Hello Oleg,
On Thursday, February 03, 2000 at 10:49:59 GMT +0400 (which was 10:49 PM where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
> Hello, the Bat! list recipients,
> Friday, February 04, 2000, Januk Aggarwal wrote to Allie Martin on TBUDL about
> If I was creative there would be a goo
Hello, the Bat! list recipients,
Friday, February 04, 2000, Januk Aggarwal wrote to Allie Martin on TBUDL about
If I was creative there would be a good subject here:
JA> Well, ok, maybe a drop down menu isn't the best implementation. :)
JA> But there should be some better way to
Hello Paula Ford,
On Friday, February 04, 2000 at 23:04:10 GMT -0500 (which was 04/02/2000
11:04 GMT +0700 my Local Time) you told to the list:
JDH>>> OK, you are now unto something. :) Both Agent and X-News have a
JDH>>> feature that I think would provide you with your solution. They
JDH>>>
Hello Januk Aggarwal,
On Thu, 3 Feb 2000 16:49:26 -0800 GMT your local time,
which was Friday, February 04, 2000, 7:49:26 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Januk Aggarwal wrote:
> Hello,
>
> What do others think?
Sometimes I get an email addressed to a lot of people and getting the
email addresses
On Thursday, February 03, 2000, Allie Martin wrote:
> OK, you are now unto something. :) Both Agent and X-News have a
> feature that I think would provide you with your solution. They both
> allow you to view, in the body of your messages, aspects of the
> Kludges that may interest the user...
>
On Thu, 3 Feb 2000 18:24:25 -0800, Januk Aggarwal wrote:
> Well, ok, maybe a drop down menu isn't the best implementation. :)
> But there should be some better way to display the contents of these
> fields. Maybe some sort of auto wrapping in the "Header" bar could do
> the trick? As for the othe
Hello Allie,
On Thursday, February 03, 2000 at 21:14:39 GMT -0500 (which was 6:14 PM where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
> Yes, I realize that, as you said, it will not show a lot of
> CC'd email addresses and that it will only show a few and end the list
> with a ''. I do al
On Thu, 3 Feb 2000 17:59:59 -0800, Januk Aggarwal wrote:
>> You do realize, don't you, that if you place the cursor over
>> any address in the headers and hit the right mouse button that a popup
>> list will appear offering you to do various things using that
>> particular address, includ
On Thu, 3 Feb 2000 17:57:47 -0800, Januk Aggarwal wrote:
>> I don't see the need to implement it in another fashion. ;-/
> Maybe you still won't, but maybe now my meaning is a little clearer.
> :)
You were very clear actually. :) It was *I* who was not clear.
Reread my message and repla
On Thursday, February 03, 2000, Januk Aggarwal wrote:
> ... What I was wondering is, would it be possible for TB! to offer a
> drop down list of the people in the To, CC and BCC fields?
GroupWise, which I am forced to use in the office, handles its address
fields this way. It is a major pain in
Hello Allie,
On Thursday, February 03, 2000 at 20:11:02 GMT -0500 (which was 5:11 PM where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
> On Thu, 3 Feb 2000 16:49:26 -0800, Januk Aggarwal wrote:
> {...snip...}
>> From there I could select one of these names and addresses and I
>> would be offered
Hello Allie,
On Thursday, February 03, 2000 at 20:11:02 GMT -0500 (which was 5:11 PM where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
> On Thu, 3 Feb 2000 16:49:26 -0800, Januk Aggarwal wrote:
> {...snip...}
>> From there I could select one of these names and addresses and I
>> would be offered
On Thu, 3 Feb 2000 16:49:26 -0800, Januk Aggarwal wrote:
{...snip...}
> From there I could select one of these names and addresses and I
> would be offered a menu that allows me to select one, add it to my
> address book, send a message, and perhaps some other common options
> that I have mi
Hello,
First let me set up the scene. My Dad sends out one message to lots
of people at once, mostly family. When I get these messages, I like
to see who he has sent the messages to, and often, I want to add one
or two addresses to my address book. Currently I have to use the show
kludges co
38 matches
Mail list logo
