Just a reminder that starting this Friday, June 15, postings to the
febo.com mailing lists will need to use the new addresses --
@lists.febo.com instead of @febo.com. You can start using the new
addresses now.
The list server will be shut down for an hour or two on Friday to make
the
Some of you may know that febo.com lives on leased hardware at a data
center. That hardware is now at its end of service life, which means it
won't be supported if it breaks. After pondering the options for a
replacement, I've decided that it's time to move away from dedicated
hardware
yet, there's still time.
John
On 05/08/2018 03:09 PM, John Ackermann N8UR wrote:
Back in October, 2016, TAPR did a build-to-order offering of the TNS-BUF
low noise, high isolation buffer amplifier. The original 2016 post is
attached below. All of those units sold out, and recently I've
TVB is traveling and not on-line as much as usual, so in his absence I'm
going to ask everyone to please consider his request a couple of weeks
ago to think before you post.
Please keep in mind that time-nuts isn't a chat room, and that every
message doesn't require an individual response.
.
Best regards,
John
Forwarded Message
Subject: [time-nuts] TNS-BUF High Isolation, Low Noise Buffer Amp Available
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2016 10:15:46 -0400
From: John Ackermann N8UR <j...@febo.com>
I've previously mentioned a high performance buffer amplifier called the
&q
Long ago I did some WWVB signal-to-noise measurements with an HP 3586C
selective voltmeter (commonly used by the FMT-nuts). I measured the signal
power at 60.0 kHz with 20 Hz bandwidth. Then I measured the power a small
offset plus and minus (100 Hz? I don't recall), and took the mean of
It's more a burst-mode and averaging analyzer like the HP 5371/5372. But it
can do sustained time interval measurements if you mess around enough with the
settings. And the resolution is down in the very low picoseconds.
But it's big, awkwardly shaped, and has a jet turbine fan.
John
On Apr
I want to jump on Tom's post, and Bob's note at 1:14 on Saturday (that
begins with "Just to be very clear..." They both raise an important
point about measurements.
With both NTP and GPSDO measurements a lot of folks focus heavily on
what the "black box" is reporting about itself. But
Hi Brooke --
Yes, all the chips on the board are low power devices. I'm measuring
the receiver as drawing 0.9 MA at about 2.3 volts.
Update -- I moved the receiver and farted around with the wiring, and
now the S-Meter is off the peg, responds to orientation changes, and I
actually got a
On 03/30/2018 03:39 AM, Hal Murray wrote:
t...@leapsecond.com said:
I updated http://leapsecond.com/museum/ulio/ with more manuals, and many
exterior / interior photos of the 301 module.
Thanks. My 301 says it is a 30TH Rev-A - mostly through hole parts. Same
layout.
Mine is the same.
of 6 pins are Vcc, TCO, AGC,
gnd.
/tvb
- Original Message -
From: "John Ackermann N8UR" <j...@febo.com>
To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement" <time-nuts@febo.com>
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2018 8:57 AM
Subject: [time-nuts] Ultralink
I just acquired an Ultralink WWVB timecode receiver -- more
specifically, model 301 receiver and model 333 decoder.
I'm looking for documentation on these guys. Anyone have a manual
they'd be willing to share?
The key questions are really just two: (a) is the 6P6C modular cable
connecting
The impedance mismatch with the A or B models is't a real issue unless you're
doing precise amplitude measurements. Lots of folks use them for FMT work
without issues. There are adapters available or buildable to deal with the odd
Telco connectors.
John
On Mar 29, 2018, 3:04 AM, at 3:04 AM,
Thanks, all. I think I'll end up using the 3042 with pass transistor,
partly for reasons of cost. I have no idea whether paralleling two
3042s would result in lower noise from the device, and there are already
three or four fairly pricey chips on the board.
I appreciate all the info!
John
Thanks, Bruce!!!
On 03/18/2018 04:19 PM, Bruce Griffiths wrote:
Use an LT3045, its the 0.5A version of the LT3042.
Bruce
On 19 March 2018 at 09:13 John Ackermann N8UR <j...@febo.com> wrote:
Reviving the conversation about superb voltage regulators, I am looking
for one to run the
Reviving the conversation about superb voltage regulators, I am looking
for one to run the analog and PLL bits of a high performance frequency
synthesizer chip.
The current drain looks to be about 160-180 mA at 1.8 V, which is
uncomfortably close to the limit for the LT3042 (200 mA). The
For those who ordered a PulsePuppy oscillator carrier board from TAPR --
we quoted early February delivery so I wanted to give a quick update.
The boards are in hand and the kits ready to go, except... USPS managed
to lose the box of programmed PICs on its way from my house to the TAPR
Here's a link to data on an 8607-008. You may recognize the bottom plot
from a recent posting. :-) But the ADEV and PN data at the top of the
page is from the factory test data. The ADEV doesn't explicitly say so,
but I strongly believe it's based on comparison with a "gold standard" 8607.
On 01/29/2018 04:54 PM, Chris Caudle wrote:
On Mon, January 29, 2018 2:38 pm, John Ackermann N8UR wrote:
The close-in phase noise is quite amazing, but the floor is much worse
than in free-run mode.
That phase noise plot doesn't look quite right, what PLL bandwidth did you
set?
Sorry
On Jan 29, 2018, 4:54 PM, at 4:54 PM, Chris Caudle <ch...@chriscaudle.org>
wrote:
>On Mon, January 29, 2018 2:38 pm, John Ackermann N8UR wrote:
>> The close-in phase noise is quite amazing, but the floor is much
>worse
>> than in free-run mode.
>
>That phase noise
>(415) 215-3779
>
>> On Jan 28, 2018, at 4:23 PM, John Ackermann N8UR <j...@febo.com>
>wrote:
>>
>> I received the Si5340A evaluation board from Digikey on Friday and
>fired it up yesterday. I used the SiLabs "ClockBuilder" software to
>configure fou
I received the Si5340A evaluation board from Digikey on Friday and fired
it up yesterday. I used the SiLabs "ClockBuilder" software to configure
four outputs -- 10 MHz, 15 MHz, 29.999 999 9 MHz, and 144.2 MHz -- all
using the 45 MHz crystal that comes with the EVM. Attached is a phase
noise
Some time ago TAPR did a one-time run of a very low noise, very high
isolation buffer amplifier. The assembled boards are sold out, but we
had some extra blank boards made and finally (after a long story) got
those delivered from Hungary to the office.
If you're interested in a TNS-BUF
pins as
well. Just keeping your options open there.
Bob L.
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2018 at 3:23 PM
From: "John Ackermann N8UR" <j...@febo.com>
To: time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Slightly OT: interest in a four-output, ultra-low
jitter, synthesizer block?
Hi Bill -
WB6BNQ
John Ackermann N8UR wrote:
Hi Bill --
I should have been more clear: this design will be for a simple case:
one reference clock input, four outputs. The chip can do all sorts of
fancy tricks, but I'm looking for a source of four low jitter outputs
derived from a 10 MHz external
.
Perhaps you could indicate what you are attempting to do with it and how
you are going to accomplish your goals ?
73BillWB6BNQ
John Ackermann N8UR wrote:
After the recent discussion about Silicon Labs clock generators, I
looked at their Si5340A part and think it will be useful
After the recent discussion about Silicon Labs clock generators, I
looked at their Si5340A part and think it will be useful for a ham radio
project I'm working on. While it can do other things, for my use it
would use a 10 MHz input clock and generate 4 independent outputs in the
range of 100
ansverters. It looks like the 5328 has two
outputs, which is still useful but would require putting two or three of
them on the board. Which isn't the end of the world.
Thanks,
John
On 1/19/2018 8:56 AM, Mark Goldberg wrote:
On Jan 19, 2018 6:01 AM, "John Ackermann N8UR" <j...@f
Sorry to hijack the thread, but the Si5351 looks interesting for another
project I'm working on. I know it specifies "low jitter" but has anyone
looked at the phase noise? Is it usable for RF applications?
Thanks,
John
On 01/18/2018 08:53 AM, D. Jeff Dionne wrote:
Chris,
You don't
FWIW, for me the hardest part of working with Stable32 is getting the
input scaling and other parameters like timestamps correct. If you
think like a mathematician, you'll probably do fine. But I don't, and
when working in particular with frequency data it always takes me a few
tries to get
egard.
>
>Dana
>
>On Sun, Dec 24, 2017 at 9:58 AM, John Ackermann N8UR <j...@febo.com>
>wrote:
>
>> I'm glad that the PulsePuppy post spawned some good discussion!
>>
>> The pot I'm using is a Bournes 3296W-1-103LF which is a 25-turn, 10K,
>> cermet
I'm glad that the PulsePuppy post spawned some good discussion!
The pot I'm using is a Bournes 3296W-1-103LF which is a 25-turn, 10K,
cermet pot, spec'd at 100ppm/degree, so it's not anything super fancy.
The number of turns provides decent setability, and it seems to be a
good match for the
at everything you see in the ADEV plot is a
>function of the
>specific OCXO you put on the board. Put another way, the. board’s ADEV
>is way
>better than the ADEV of the OCXO. It’s a very safe bet that everything
>past 2 seconds
>or is the OCXO.
>
>Bob
>
>&g
Sorry, a typo got into the URL for the manual. Remove the extraneous
"m" after ".pdf": http://www.tapr.org/~n8ur/PulsePuppy_Manual.pdf
On 12/23/2017 04:00 PM, John Ackermann N8UR wrote:
I've developed a little board called the PulsePuppy that supports
surplus OCXOs in
TAPR sold out the first run of TICC timestamping counters but we just
took delivery of a second batch, and we're now taking orders. See
http://tapr.org/kits_ticc for details.
John
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go
Jim, I thought about using an RF-input sync pulse for alignment during
the Solar Eclipse measurement experiment, but ended up running out of
time to implement it. But some very crude experiments indicated that
it's not hard to generate an edge out of a PPS that creates a comb well
past HF.
On 10/23/2017 04:52 PM, Hal Murray wrote:
But if any of the EXT REF are low-z inputs, that won't work so well.
Unless there is only one. Then you can use it as the last one and you don't
need the explicit terminator.
Good point.
___
time-nuts
To some extent, it depends on the load presented by each device. The
"EXT REF" input on many pieces of test equipment is fairly high
impedance (maybe 10k?) and you can drive several of those with a single
output, putting a 50 ohm load at the end of the line to provide a
reasonable
The inductor in the T2-Mini is nothing special.
On Oct 4, 2017, 12:57 PM, at 12:57 PM, Attila Kinali wrote:
>On Wed, 4 Oct 2017 12:02:35 +1300 (NZDT)
>Bruce Griffiths wrote:
>
>> I could measure the PN of the TAPR variant of the Wenzel circuit
>> as
(This is more amplitude than frequency related, but thought it might be
interesting to the group. If not, sorry for the intrusion.)
I used three software defined radios to record just under 1 TB of data
during the eclipse period from my cottage at Beaver Island, Michigan,
over 8 hours from
ld imagine.
Alan
G3NYK
- Original Message ----- From: "John Ackermann N8UR" <j...@febo.com>
To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement"
<time-nuts@febo.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2017 8:10 PM
Subject: [time-nuts] Fwd: [hpsdr] SDR experiment fo
This is a little off-topic, but thought some of the group might be
interested... so please forgive the interruption.
John
Forwarded Message
Subject: [hpsdr] SDR experiment for the solar eclipse
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2017 15:07:57 -0400
From: John Ackermann N8UR <j...@febo.
For what it's worth, I use PowerPoles extensively -- I use them for all
my 12V distribution on ham gear as well as time-nuts stuff. One great
advantage of the genderless design is that you can use extension cables,
breakout boxes, and other tools to solve lots of problems.
But they do lack
We did this years ago on a 430 MHz data radio with an utterly uncompensated
crystal that would drift through the passband. After building our own for a
while, we discovered that Yaesu had something even better available through
their replacement parts shop -- a spring clip with PTC that
If your browser has been throwing security warnings or errors when you
try to access the web server at febo.com (for example, the list
archives), that problem should now be fixed.
I was using an SSL certificate issued by StartSSL, a company that has
sort of shot themselves in the foot due to
I investigated police radar stuff a long time ago, and for a while had
an old X band unit shaped just like a searchlight, with analog meter.
What I learned then was that even on the newer units, the tuning fork
was specified to provide an independent means to verify the accuracy of
the unit in
Is there any way to derive carrier phase from these chips? Or to get raw
modulation data that might make it usable as the front end to one of PaulS's
de-PSKers?
On Apr 7, 2017, 1:04 PM, at 1:04 PM, Tom Van Baak wrote:
>> Very good catch it is *not* the cme8000 chip. Thats
I noticed with the TICC that the very high peak voltage on the 5061, 5065, etc.
PPS causes trigger errors. Putting a 50 ohm load at the TICC channel input
helped a lot, or an attenuator might even be better.
These HP units have a very short pulse width that peaks at something like 20v
into a
I saw a similar higher-than-expected ADEV from another user who was measuring
GPSDO PPS vs. 10 MHz from the same GPSDO. Using a T2-Mini from the 10 MHz
yields the expected results.
I suspect that the GPSDO PPS in that unit is derived from GPS PPS rather than
the OCXO, and thus is noisier in
Hi Andrew --
There seems to be more than a little magic involved in getting sane
three-corner measurements. I've gotten best results when the run is
long enough to have many data points per tau, and also that results when
you're noise limited tend to go imaginary. Finally, I think things
This is very, very cool, Mark. I've been concerned for a long time that
people take way too seriously what you properly call "bogo-ADEV" that's
self-generated from the GPSDO. Integrating a counter that compares
against an external source is a huge win.
But I want to remind everyone that as
I really like the setup that Mark is describing. As to TAPR's plans,
we've found that enclosures are a challenge -- metalwork is pretty
expensive unless you get significant volume, and in our niche market,
that's hard to do.
But I am hoping to find an inexpensive clamshell-type enclosure
Hi All --
The production batch of TICCs has arrived at TAPR and the first
shipments to customers are going out today. It will probably take
another few days to get them all sent -- there are nearly 100 units
going out the door!
As previously mentioned, the TICCs have been loaded with
Our contract manufacturer has started loading software and testing the
TICC systems (and so far, they all work!), and should ship the
production run to TAPR by the end of the week. We'll start shipping
them to customers shortly after they arrive at the office.
We still have units available
We know of OCXO that have been continuously running for years and have
exceptional aging, supposedly as a result.
What does it take to interrupt that? A momentary loss of power? The
oven cooling down? Some long period of off-time? Or, once the
oscillator has baked in will it return to that
So I was clever and decided to log some PPS data to a folder within my
"Dropbox" folder. Strange results followed... the whole system just
bogged down, and even fairly slow serial data dropped characters.
It turns out that the culprit was the Dropbox daemon continuously trying
to sync the
Autodesk just sent a follow-up to my "new price model unacceptable"
complaint a few days ago. It looks like they are going to upgrade the
"Standard" subscription ($100/year) to support 4 layer boards up to 160
cm2, which I think matches the current standard version capabilities.
Here's a
The .INF file seems just to be a text description, and the non-versioned
.ext/.zip/.run file file is a link to the file one with the version number.
So either one will get you the same installer, and the .INF file isn't needed.
Sent from BlueMail
On Jan 21, 2017, 9:45 PM, at 9:45 PM,
Since quite a few of the folks on the list love the smell of solder in
the morning, I thought I'd pass along a supplier of new and refurbished
soldering stuff that I've had really good luck with:
Bruce Sander at EAE Sales -- https://www.eaesales.com/ in Grabill, Indiana.
I encountered EAE a
Hi Scott --
We received the first-unit sample a couple of weeks ago and it successfully
passed all tests, so we gave the go-ahead to do the production build.
We've also sent the Contract Manufacturer the final software versions to be
loaded to the Arduino as well as a set of test oscillators
Sorry, I missed the "complete unit" part... the TAPR products do require
some soldering. The TADD-2 does have a case available if that helps.
John
On 1/5/2017 8:21 AM, John Ackermann N8UR wrote:
Hi Bob --
TAPR has two boards that provide life support for Tom's PICDiv chips:
T
Hi Bob --
TAPR has two boards that provide life support for Tom's PICDiv chips:
The "TADD-2" is a six-channel divider allowing each channel to have its
rate independently set from a common source:
https://www.tapr.org/kits_tadd-2.html
The "T2-Mini" is a tiny board that provides a single
Happy New Year, Time-Nuts!
TAPR received the production run of TNS-BUF boards, and the engineering
sample of the TICC, from our contract manufacturer last week.
Both boards are nicely built and work as intended.
TNS-BUF boards will be shipping soon to those who ordered; some may
already
For amateur use, PPS comparison requires less equipment and can be more
accurate than trying to measure RF rates like 10 MHz.
When comparing two PPS signals, phase slips are very infrequent so you
can observe drift rate over minutes/hours/days with an oscilloscope or
simple time interval
That points out a key difference in the PCB house pricing models:
ExpressPCB and the Advanced Circuits $33 prototype are flat fee up to a
size limit (for Advanced Circuits 4 x 6 inches) while others go by the
square inch -- OSH Park is $5/in2 for three copies of two layer, and
$10/in2 for
-
Subject: [time-nuts] New Timestamping / Time Interval Counter: the TICC
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2016 10:48:57 -0500
From: John Ackermann N8UR <j...@febo.com>
Counters with resolution below 1 nanosecond are difficult.
They require either outrageous clock speeds, or interpolat
On 12/04/2016 04:34 PM, jimlux wrote:
Even for time-nuts, I suspect we're not looking to eke out the last
percent of efficiency from 96% to 97%, or handle wildly varying loads,
etc. Nor are we usually looking for absolute minimum parts cost.
The little OCXO I used for testing goes from about
as the
battery drains but my current solution is noisyand those 78xx chips waste
far to much power. )
On Sun, Dec 4, 2016 at 10:50 AM, John Ackermann N8UR <j...@febo.com> wrote:
I found a cute little switching regulator that's a drop-in replacement for
an LM7805: http://www.ebay.com/itm/261243604
And Digikey does stock the Murata part, for about $4.30. Why I couldn't
find it when searching their site for switching regulators, I don't know.
John
On 12/04/2016 02:39 PM, John Ackermann N8UR wrote:
Thanks for that pointer! When I searched Digikey, I wasn't able to find
anything
:50 PM, John Ackermann N8UR <j...@febo.com> wrote:
I found a cute little switching regulator that's a drop-in replacement for
an LM7805: http://www.ebay.com/itm/261243604047
I got a couple to play with, mainly to see how bad the noise would be.
Here are spectrum analyzer and PN shots com
something really obvious (again)?
Bob
On Nov 27, 2016, at 10:04 AM, John Ackermann N8UR <j...@febo.com> wrote:
Good guess. The 10 MHz reference drives all the logic on the board, and
particularly the counter that maintains a local timescale in 100us increments;
the TDC7200 interpolates b
Good guess. The 10 MHz reference drives all the logic on the board, and
particularly the counter that maintains a local timescale in 100us
increments; the TDC7200 interpolates between the 100us ticks to stamp
incoming events on channel A and/or B with picosecond precision. The
stamps on both
Hi Luciano --
Glad to hear that!
The capability you asked for already exists (great minds think alike...)
In timestamp mode, the TICC will output the stamps for each channel
independently, measured against the common 10 MHz reference. So if both
channels are active, you'll see a bunch of
e code, so that's the urgent goal.
Thanks!
John
On 11/25/2016 03:26 AM, David wrote:
John,
In what language is the GUI written? I might be able to help on
that, or other parts of the software, if someone else hasn't yet
volunteered.
Dave, WA8YWQ
On 2016-11-24 06:43, John Ackermann
is typically about 13ps
or so.
Bruce
On Thursday, November 24, 2016 09:43:54 AM John Ackermann N8UR
wrote:
Hi Anders --
Thanks, and thanks for the info on the 53230A. I have not used one of
those myself but the data sheet lists 20ps single-shot.
Also I should note that the TICC does not compete
been a more elegant approach if they had been available.
John
On 11/24/2016 02:49 AM, Andrew Rodland wrote:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 10:48 AM, John Ackermann N8UR <j...@febo.com> wrote:
The TICC is implemented as a two-channel timestamping counter. That means
it can measure one or t
Hi Anders --
Thanks, and thanks for the info on the 53230A. I have not used one of
those myself but the data sheet lists 20ps single-shot.
Also I should note that the TICC does not compete with counters like the
53230A for high speed measurement, or frequency counting. It does far
fewer
Several years ago I measured the delay of about 80 feet of LMR400
feeding a GPS antenna, much of which was lying on a black shingle roof
in the Georgia sun. I checked in early afternoon when the sun was
beating, and in the wee hours of the morning, to get the greatest
temperature delta. My
Thanks, all for the tips. Glad to know it's a standard size so there's
plenty of choice.
John
On 11/21/2016 12:57 PM, jimlux wrote:
On 11/21/16 6:39 AM, Charles Steinmetz wrote:
Tom wrote:
EFB0412MD
Airflow 7.17 CFM
6300 RPM
Noise 24 dBA
FBK04F12U
Same exact form factor.
Air Flow
Does anyone have a part number for the 53132 fan (or equivalent)? Mine
is getting pretty noisy.
Thanks!
John
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the
Either hot tweezers or a hot air rework station are the best/easiest
ways to remove dead parts. But two fine-tip soldering irons will also
work and are a lot cheaper. The idea is to heat both ends of the part
at once, and when the solder flows, lift or flip the part off. Then,
use some
We had enough interest in the TNS-BUF isolation amplifier project to go
ahead with a production run. Thanks!
The order has been placed with our contract manufacturer in Hungary and
we expect the boards to arrive at the TAPR office in Texas around
January 1, plus or minus shipping and customs
On 10/27/2016 11:06 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
This is why a lot of people in costal climates who ventilate their
basement during summer "to dry out the basement" get the exact
opposite result: The air outside is a lot wetter than on the inside.
I learned this myself last summer. We have
On 10/26/2016 1:00 PM, Richard (Rick) Karlquist wrote:
On 10/26/2016 8:59 AM, John Ackermann N8UR wrote:
I may have the opportunity to build a small "clock room" and am
considering whether I could make it an environmentally controlled space.
I'd like to learn about the options
26/2016 12:09 PM, William H. Fite wrote:
John, this is what I bought for the Orlando VA Medical Center when I was
setting up the research lab there.
Not cheap, though. 螺
https://www.thermalproductsolutions.com/products/walk-in-temperature-humidity-test-rooms
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 11:59 AM, John
I may have the opportunity to build a small "clock room" and am
considering whether I could make it an environmentally controlled space.
I'd like to learn about the options for doing this.
The space would probably be 6x8 feet or so, in a basement with one
outside wall.
Can anyone point me
We've received enough orders to go ahead with production on the TNS-BUF,
so here's your last chance to join the cool kids -- we'll take orders at
http://tapr.org/kits_tns-buf through tomorrow, Oct. 20.
John
Forwarded Message
Subject: [time-nuts] TNS-BUF High Isolation, Low
feedthrough.
This is a buffer amp, not a distribution amp, so it's a single channel
circuit, and high isolation was one of the key design criteria.
John
On 10/12/2016 09:08 AM, Chris Caudle wrote:
On Wed, October 5, 2016 9:15 am, John Ackermann N8UR wrote:
I've previously mentioned
Just a reminder that the deadline to order TNS-BUF isolation amps is
next week -- October 20.
John
Forwarded Message
Subject: [time-nuts] TNS-BUF High Isolation, Low Noise Buffer Amp Available
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2016 10:15:46 -0400
From: John Ackermann N8UR <j...@febo.
It's possible we may have some bare boards, but no guarantees at this point.
On 10/5/2016 2:04 PM, Dan Rae wrote:
For those of us who aren't scared of surface mount stuff, and maybe even
prefer it, will there be any bare boards available?
Dan - ac6ao
I've previously mentioned a high performance buffer amplifier called the
"TNS-BUF" that I built based on a design by Dr. Bruce Griffiths with
further input from John Miles. Key numbers are:
* Phase noise -140dBc/Hz at 1 Hertz offset, noise floor -175dBc/Hz.
(PN plot attached)
* Reverse
I think there are two separate issues to consider:
1. Cesium depletion, which only occurs when the tube is operating with
cesium oven on, and high voltage at the other end; and
2. Tube vacuum and other physical aspects that may deteriorate over
time, whether or not the tube is operating.
at way, the triggering should be pretty solid. There is still
> the wonderful stuff about pulses that
> arrive on top of each other ….
>
> Bob
>
>> On Sep 16, 2016, at 1:10 PM, John Ackermann N8UR <j...@febo.com> wrote:
>>
>> I'm fairly new to driving the 5
I'm fairly new to driving the 53132 and it seems to be quite a pain to set up
reliable triggering for TTL-level pulses (e.g., PPS). Simply leaving it to
auto-trigger sure doesn't do the trick. Any suggestions on optimum trigger
settings for this use?
Thanks!
Long ago I measured the impact of the linux low_latency flag on a 16550 UART.
I don't know where that data is sitting now, but I remember that it made a
significant difference.
> On Jul 18, 2016, at 9:59 PM, Hal Murray wrote:
>
>
> jim...@earthlink.net said:
>>
I'm a bit of a crypto-geek and was able to visit Bletchley a couple of
times, again many years ago. It is definitely worth a trip, though from
what I saw on my visits and have read lately it has evolved badly.
It used to be run on a shoestring with enthusiastic volunteers
everywhere and lots
When I was there (10+ years ago) the timekeeping stuff was at the observatory,
which is just a few minutes walk up from the NMM. Both sites are fascinating
and well worth spending some time.
I took a tour boat to get to Greenwich from central London -- it's the end of
the line and if you work
You know, this thread has had a tremendous amount of practical information,
with actual URLs, etc. Would someone be willing to consolidate the info on a
web page somewhere?
> On Jun 24, 2016, at 9:56 AM, Oz-in-DFW wrote:
>
> On 6/23/2016 10:53 PM, Chris Albertson wrote:
I've seen references that at least by the latter part of WW2 oscillographs were
being used to identify transmitters and/or ops. It should be possible to
deduce chirp, rise time, fall time of signals, all of which characterize the
transmitter, as well as element spacing and other
Boy, that looks an awful lot like a re-branded Sulzer 5 with Sulzer power
supply!
> On Jun 7, 2016, at 1:38 PM, wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Saw this while trolling for goodies!
>
> http://www.mullardmagic.co.uk/racal-ma259-frequency-standard-ra17-ra117-r
>
1 - 100 of 869 matches
Mail list logo