Re: Tomcat Performance Concerns

2003-02-07 Thread Peter Lin
riday, February 07, 2003 6:17 AM > Subject: Re: Tomcat Performance Concerns > 9. tool for generating jmeter test plan from tomcat access logs What a great idea, that never occured to me (I haven't looked at the access log valve much, can it include POST information? > I have tried to prov

Re: Tomcat Performance Concerns

2003-02-07 Thread Will Hartung
> From: "Peter Lin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 6:17 AM > Subject: Re: Tomcat Performance Concerns > 9. tool for generating jmeter test plan from tomcat access logs What a great idea, that never occured to me (I haven't looked at

Re: Tomcat Performance Concerns

2003-02-07 Thread Peter Lin
There's a link to it on the tomcat resources page. http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/resources.html Here's a general list of what the book will contain. 1. setting performance requirements 2. building test plans 3. vm tuning options with benchmark results 4. performance consideration for data mo

Re: Tomcat Performance Concerns

2003-02-06 Thread Bill Barker
age- > From: Sean Dockery [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 3:40 PM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: Re: Tomcat Performance Concerns > > > I look forward to getting a copy of your book. > > What will be the book's title? Who will

Re: Tomcat Performance Concerns

2003-02-06 Thread Bill Barker
"Anecito, Anthony (HQP)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi All, > > I am looking at Tomcat for production and seeing some things that make me > question its use for production. I believe what Jakarta group is doing is a > great thing for all of

RE: Tomcat Performance Concerns

2003-02-06 Thread Jacob Kjome
Sean Dockery [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 3:40 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Tomcat Performance Concerns I look forward to getting a copy of your book. What will be the book's title? Who will be your publishing company? What is the scheduled release da

RE: Tomcat Performance Concerns

2003-02-06 Thread Turner, John
ED]] Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 6:40 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Tomcat Performance Concerns I look forward to getting a copy of your book. What will be the book's title? Who will be your publishing company? What is the scheduled release date? At 11:10 2003-02-06 -

RE: Tomcat Performance Concerns

2003-02-06 Thread Anecito, Anthony (HQP)
OS should have for Tomcat Many Thanks, Tony -Original Message- From: Sean Dockery [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 3:40 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Tomcat Performance Concerns I look forward to getting a copy of your book. What will be the book&#

Re: Tomcat Performance Concerns

2003-02-06 Thread Sean Dockery
I look forward to getting a copy of your book. What will be the book's title? Who will be your publishing company? What is the scheduled release date? At 11:10 2003-02-06 -0800, you wrote: Most of this stuff is covered in the book with an example webapp and benchmarks to show the trade off in

RE: Tomcat Performance Concerns

2003-02-06 Thread Chanan Braunstein
Yet another performance page: http://webperformanceinc.com/library/ServletReport/index.html Chanan Braunstein knovel Corp. Web Development Manager 607-648-4770 x672 http://www.knovel.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: Tomcat Performance Concerns

2003-02-06 Thread Peter Lin
rtung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > From: "Turner, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 10:01 AM > > Subject: RE: Tomcat Performance Concerns > > > > 1. Orion is a "competitor" to Tomcat making > benchmarks f

RE: Tomcat Performance Concerns

2003-02-06 Thread Turner, John
hapira, Yoav'; Tomcat Users List > Subject: RE: Tomcat Performance Concerns > > > Hi Shapira, > > Many thanks for the reply. I agree with your list below but > am looking for > some simple benchmarks to start with. Also, a previous > response to this > posting by

Re: Tomcat Performance Concerns

2003-02-06 Thread Will Hartung
> From: "Turner, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 10:01 AM > Subject: RE: Tomcat Performance Concerns > 1. Orion is a "competitor" to Tomcat making benchmarks from them > automatically suspect (at the very least biased)...th

RE: Tomcat Performance Concerns

2003-02-06 Thread Anecito, Anthony (HQP)
m: Shapira, Yoav [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 10:09 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Tomcat Performance Concerns Howdy, >Tomcat performance and a reference to some benchmarks. The benchmarks were >done in 2001 and are out of date Very out of date.

Re: Tomcat Performance Concerns

2003-02-06 Thread Peter Lin
I've been running a ton of benchmarks the last 3 weeks for the Tomcat Performance book with Remy. General questions like that are very hard to answer. Most performance issues are the result of bad design and poor administration. If some one is telling you "tomcat can't perform." they need to back

RE: Tomcat Performance Concerns

2003-02-06 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Howdy, >Tomcat performance and a reference to some benchmarks. The benchmarks were >done in 2001 and are out of date Very out of date. Referring to a previous (3.x) generation of Tomcat, which is much slower than the current (4.1.x) implementation. I haven't used Orion, but looking at their fr

RE: Tomcat Performance Concerns

2003-02-06 Thread Turner, John
nal Message- > From: Anecito, Anthony (HQP) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 12:50 PM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: Tomcat Performance Concerns > > > Hi All, > > I am looking at Tomcat for production and seeing some things

Tomcat Performance Concerns

2003-02-06 Thread Anecito, Anthony (HQP)
Hi All, I am looking at Tomcat for production and seeing some things that make me question its use for production. I believe what Jakarta group is doing is a great thing for all of us looking for cheaper alternatives but there is may be a serious issue to using Tomcat. I have seen and now read con