pippin;608155 Wrote:
If your server connects to a GBit switch the leg from the server to the
switch will be autonegotiated to 1GBit
So it must be in that leg that the SQ of the packets gets mangled.
--
chill
chill's
chill;608158 Wrote:
So it must be in that leg that the SQ of the packets gets mangled.
That's why I proposed 10Base2
--
pippin
---
see iPeng, the Squeezebox iPhone remote and
*New: iPeng for iPad*, at penguinlovesmusic.com
Guys.
Don't panic! Calm down.
There is no rush to run into wild network reconfigurations. The
majority is running Windows anyhow, and those Linux based NASes seem to
perform as well as Windows.
For now we're talking about a minority of Linux folks or better Ubuntu
folks in particular.
Fact
soundcheck;608161 Wrote:
Fact is that different systems and system configurations do seem to have
an impact.
And according to your DIYAudio thread, this latest mod of yours makes
it difficult to distinguish between Windows and Ubuntu.
I have my own opinion about the source of the SQ
Has network statistics been examined ?
Has anybody counted the number of data packets being sent ? Does it
change between different settings ? It's possible that there is a TCP
segmentation issue and packets are segmented differently according to
different settings.
Has error / retrans counts
chill;608163 Wrote:
And according to your DIYAudio thread, this latest mod of yours makes it
difficult to distinguish between Windows and Ubuntu.
Yep. You got it.
Though it is not my latest mod. It is the first try to figure out
what's causing it. That's the whole intention of my Beta
chill;608146 Wrote:
Thanks for the confirmation. So it must be the optional half duplex mod
that makes all the difference then
That is -one- of the possible explanations, yes.
--
andynormancx
Yes, it will. Yes, all of them. Yes, SoftSqueeze as well. What ?
I SAID ALL OF THEM !
chill;608146 Wrote:
Thanks for the confirmation. So it must be the optional half duplex mod
that makes all the difference then
erm...dunno.
Half-duplex introduces collision detection - and lowers bandwidth.
I'm not sure we can have a logical discussion about this.
IF there is an
bpa;608164 Wrote:
Has network statistics been examined ?
Has anybody counted the number of data packets being sent ? Does it
change between different settings ? It's possible that there is a TCP
segmentation issue and packets are segmented differently according to
different settings.
Phil Leigh;608168 Wrote:
IF there is an effect, it is RFI/noise getting into the Touch via
ethernet cable. Nothing to do with TCP/IP or any of the logical OSI
layers per se.
How do yo know. Done your homework?
Ever looked into TCP/IP issues and parametrization? I doubt that.
Phil
soundcheck;608173 Wrote:
How do yo know. Done your homework?
Ever looked into TCP/IP issues and parametrization? I doubt that.
Speculations over speculations. I can't believe that.
That you can read since almost a year on my blog. If you'd read my
blog.
You could have
soundcheck;608172 Wrote:
Linux driver issue: As you've seen people compared a Linux based NAS
with W7. And here the result was similar.
similar as in some found Linux to be better (ReadyNAS) and some found
it to be worse?
--
pippin
---
see iPeng, the Squeezebox iPhone remote and
*New:
Phil Leigh;608179 Wrote:
By baselessly insulting and patronising me you merely make yourself look
even more foolish.
I don't think so. Your cynism is omnipresent.
You're the measurement guy over here who is not delivering anything,
since
weeks. If RMI/EMI makes it through the ground, who
pippin;608181 Wrote:
similar as in some found Linux to be better (ReadyNAS) and some found
it to be worse?
I would have to look it up.
Whatsoever. Some peole hear nothing, some hear this, the others hear
that.
The OS seems to have an impact. For me a sign the have a closer look at
it.
No
Klaus, and anyone else who suspects that network comms are affecting SQ
I think it was Phil who offered a simple test. Pull the ethernet cable
out of the back of your Touch while it is playing a track. By
definition, all network comms will stop at that moment, but the Touch
will have around
soundcheck;608191 Wrote:
I would have to look it up.
Whatsoever. Some peole hear nothing, some hear this, the others hear
that.
The OS seems to have an impact. For me a sign to have a closer look at
it.
Each network itself has too many variables to come to a general
conclusion,
chill;608197 Wrote:
Klaus, and anyone else who suspects that network comms are affecting SQ
I think it was Phil who offered a simple test. Pull the ethernet cable
out of the back of your Touch while it is playing a track. By
definition, all network comms will stop at that moment, but the
Indeed. One can feel your blood pressure going up here.
Sorry, but the style by which you comment here to people who even take
this discussion serious and contribute useful ideas on how to clear
things up just discredit everything you propose yourself.
--
pippin
---
see iPeng, the Squeezebox
soundcheck;608209 Wrote:
Good luck with that very intelligent cable pull test. My blood pressure
boils up while running back and forth pulling cables to catch the
effective slot of 10s.
I already hear the sharks commenting on non-compliant ABX testing.
Then I don't even know what kind
magiccarpetride;608051 Wrote:
Anyone with dual OSX/Windows boot tried the comparison? I don't have a
dual boot (only running Squeezebox server on OSX), but I'd really like
to learn whether there are any audible differences between the two OSs.
But you have been arguing that what other people
aubuti;608326 Wrote:
But you have been arguing that what other people believe/hear is
irrelevant to one's own musical experience -- so what would it matter
if someone else could or couldn't detect an audible difference?
Self-esteem a little low today? :-)
I never said that. I said that if
magiccarpetride;608392 Wrote:
To these tight chested people I say a very loud and clear fuck you!.
I agree totally :) For me the soundcheck mods are also GREAT
improvement. Thank You Klaus !
--
praganj
Hi soundcheck
I've compared the difference
1) ReadyNas Duo 1GB, firmware 4.1.7, SqueezeBoxServer 7.6.0~31873
2) Win 7 64bit, 8GB, SqueezeBoxServer 7.6.0~31873
I personally find that the ReadyNas Duo sounds better. Cleaner with
tigher bass.
--
kiat
magiccarpetride;607501 Wrote:
If we continue in this idiotically scholastic fashion, pretty soon
someone will claim that the rain is falling because the grass is
growing.
Answers.com: 'How does vegetation affect climate?'
(http://wiki.answers.com/Q/How_does_vegetation_affect_climate)
--
kiat;607866 Wrote:
Hi soundcheck
I've compared the difference
1) ReadyNas Duo 1GB, firmware 4.1.7, SqueezeBoxServer 7.6.0~31873
2) Win 7 64bit, 8GB, SqueezeBoxServer 7.6.0~31873
I personally find that the ReadyNas Duo sounds better. Cleaner with
tigher bass.
I got similar feedback
I also did a comparison with the following setup:
1) Squeezeplug + USB Drive with SqueezeBoxServer 7.6.0 - 31873
OS: Debian Linux 6.0 - DE - utf8
Architecture: armv5tel-linux
Perl-Version: 5.10.1 - arm-linux-gnueabi-thread-multi
DBD: SQLite 1.32_01 (sqlite 3.7.4)
2) Win7 64bit, 12GB,
Soundman;607962 Wrote:
I also did a comparison with the following setup:
1) Squeezeplug + USB Drive with SqueezeBoxServer 7.6.0 - 31873
OS: Debian Linux 6.0 - DE - utf8
Architecture: armv5tel-linux
Perl-Version: 5.10.1 - arm-linux-gnueabi-thread-multi
DBD: SQLite 1.32_01 (sqlite 3.7.4)
I just wrote up the instructions on TT Beta Blog for the Linux folks
around here.
Let me know what you think.
Have fun.
--
soundcheck
'soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 2.0'
(http://soundcheck-audio.blogspot.com/2011/01/soundchecks-squeezebox-touch-toolbox-20.html)
|| 'soundcheck's Touch Toolbox -
soundcheck;607965 Wrote:
BTW: Does your Sheevaplug got enough power to do server based flac
decoding?
Yes, absolutely no problem at all. I always use server based flac
decoding and I have many 24/96 tracks.
I'm listening to music right now and the serverload is minimal:
CPU load averages
soundcheck;607968 Wrote:
I just wrote up the instructions on TT Beta Blog for the Linux folks
around here.
Let me know what you think.
Have fun.
Anyone with dual OSX/Windows boot tried the comparison? I don't have a
dual boot (only running Squeezebox server on OSX), but I'd really like
chill;608093 Wrote:
Do you have a theory for how this can affect sound quality? According
to the specification page for the Touch, it's wired ethernet 'connects
to any 100 Mbps or 10 Mbps network' - no mention of Gigabit - so
wouldn't a Linux box end up talking to the Touch at 100Mbps
soundcheck;607968 Wrote:
I just wrote up the instructions on TT Beta Blog for the Linux folks
around here.
Let me know what you think.
Have fun.
Hi Soundcheck
My ReadyNas Due is running the SqueezeboxServer directly internally.
Both the Win7 and ReadyNas is running at 1000MBit
I
tonyptony;607837 Wrote:
I may have missed this, but has anyone else found the digital volume of
the Touch locked at 50% after applying the 2.0 mods? I did a full hard
button reset, then install of 2.0. It went fine. I did all of the
recommended Soundcheck tweaks, but I did leave all outputs
pippin;608101 Wrote:
No. The linux box talks to nothing but the next switch.
There your precious bits will be buffered, sent through an internal
bus, re-packaged and sent to the next device in the link.
Indeed - that's how my own setup looks, so I see that my Mac ethernet
interface runs at
Phil Leigh;608145 Wrote:
The Touch ONLY does 100Mb... so assuming a typical setup of
server-router-Touch, the whole chain will be autonegotiated down to
running at 100Mb anyway.
Thanks for the confirmation. So it must be the optional half duplex
mod that makes all the difference then
Update:
Disregard those figures. I found a way to isolate the Perl module in
the activity monitor, and I queued up a FLAC album (previous figures
were based on an old OGG album). The Perl process seems to maintain a
continuous level of network traffic at around 110-140KB/sec, until
about 40
chill;607593 Wrote:
Update:
Disregard those figures. I found a way to isolate the Perl module in
the activity monitor, and I queued up a FLAC album (previous figures
were based on an old OGG album). The Perl process seems to maintain a
continuous level of network traffic at around
soundcheck;607292 Wrote:
Confirmed! For W7 and Vista
What about Win XP?
I'm running SBS on XP SP1.
--
Kuja
Kuja's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=32935
View this thread:
Kuja;607622 Wrote:
What about Win XP?
I'm running SBS on XP SP1.
SP1 ! wow.
--
Phil Leigh
You want to see the signal path BEFORE it gets onto a CD/vinyl...it
ain't what you'd call minimal...
Touch(wired/XP) - TACT 2.2X (Linear PSU) + Good Vibrations S/W - MF
Triplethreat(Audiocom
chill;607593 Wrote:
So all that this shows is that, for the Mac at least, the period between
-40s and -10s should be virtually free of network traffic, and should
sound better than the rest of the track if there's anything to this
theory.
soundcheck;607596 Wrote:
And just to mention it:
chill;607642 Wrote:
I forgot to mention that my figures are for an unmodified Touch, so the
size of the internal buffer is as Logitech intended. Am I
understanding correctly the effect of the buffer reduction mod in
believing that the Touch will be able to store less audio as a result
of
Ah, OK.
Have you been able to check the characteristics of the network traffic
under Windows and/or Linux? Are they anything like the numbers I
observed on the Mac?
--
chill
chill's Profile:
chill;607649 Wrote:
Ah, OK.
Have you been able to check the characteristics of the network traffic
under Windows and/or Linux? Are they anything like the numbers I
observed on the Mac?
The friend of mine has done it. He measured higher throughput on his
Windows machine. I havn't done
Kuja;607622 Wrote:
What about Win XP?
I'm running SBS on XP SP1.
I'm now working on running Squeezebox Server under Windows 3.1 - with
the much lower operating system overhead, I'm expecting far superior
results. And once I get that set up, DOS and CP/M will be next.
--
ftlight
ftlight;607796 Wrote:
I'm now working on running Squeezebox Server under Windows 3.1 - with
the much lower operating system overhead, I'm expecting far superior
results. And once I get that set up, DOS and CP/M will be next.
Please don't shoot the messenger, but I'm getting absolutely
magiccarpetride;607803 Wrote:
Please don't shoot the messenger, but I'm getting absolutely superior
digital streaming sound quality ever since I've switched to the system
operating on a batch of punched cards. Try it, you'll never look back!
A match made in heaven -- it's where the analog
garym;607809 Wrote:
I find my punch cards using COBOL language are even better than the
cards with FORTRAN. ;-)
Haha! COBOL? Dilettante! I urge you to switch to RPG II. You won't
believe your ears -- the sound is much punchier (pun intended),
especially if you keep your RPG indicators in
magiccarpetride;607814 Wrote:
COBOL carries so much processing overhead it's not even funny. It
muddies the sound so much, that I don't know if it's opera that's
playing or Justin Bieber.
+1 ...and if we've even heard of COBOL, we're too old to have much
hearing left.. I lost most of
garym;607816 Wrote:
+1 ...and if we've even heard of COBOL, we're too old to have much
hearing left.. I lost most of mine on the front row of a few Who
concerts (Who's Next Quadrophenia tours). All my search for better
sounding stuff is mostly just theoretical!
In my case, I'm relying
I may have missed this, but has anyone else found the digital volume of
the Touch locked at 50% after applying the 2.0 mods? I did a full hard
button reset, then install of 2.0. It went fine. I did all of the
recommended Soundcheck tweaks, but I did leave all outputs active. I'm
using v7.5.1 of
Because we always hear that both Linux and OSX based boxes are better.
Witness products like the Auraliti and Mach2Mini. In addition, lots of
industry insiders/designers of computer based solutions prefer MAC and
Linux (example: Gordon at Wavelength).
--
firedog
Tranquil PC fanless WHS server
firedog;607323 Wrote:
Because we always hear that both Linux and OSX based boxes are better.
Witness products like the Auraliti and Mach2Mini. In addition, lots of
industry insiders/designers of computer based solutions prefer MAC and
Linux (example: Gordon at Wavelength).
It's not that
Well, I really don't know how come but I hear difference in sound
dynamics when I play from 7.6 sb server on Win7 laptop or 7.6 sb server
from Qnap 219P (ssots) with same settings and both wired with cat 5e
where I prefer the nas.
--
PietB
chill;607291 Wrote:
Can you clarify - are you saying that your Squeezebox Touch sounds
better when connected to Squeezebox Server running on Windows 7 than it
does when connected to Squeezebox Server running on Linux?
SOUNDCHECK: Confirmed! For W7 and Vista
Good Lord! Just when you thought
guidof;607399 Wrote:
*SOUNDCHECK:* Confirmed! For W7 and Vista
Good Lord! Just when you thought all OS 'sound' the same! ;)
Guido F.
Can anyone compare the same between Windows and OSX?
--
magiccarpetride
soundcheck;607365 Wrote:
It's not that easy as you might think. And it is not black or white
either.
You need to differentiate a bit more.
Logitech is not using the soundlayer of any OS on the server side
(let's not talk about Alsa on the Touch for now).
What I am talking about is
I realise y'all aren't wi-fi fans, but you should try comparing the
sound of the IP packets sent to the Touch via Windows to those from OSX
AND linux over wi-fi...
--
Phil Leigh
You want to see the signal path BEFORE it gets onto a CD/vinyl...it
ain't what you'd call minimal...
guidof;607399 Wrote:
*SOUNDCHECK:* Confirmed! For W7 and Vista
Good Lord! Just when you thought all OS 'sound' the same! ;)
I'm waiting to hear that Cisco switches sound better than Nortel, which
of course is going to sound better than Netgear or D-Link.
It's quite entertaining to hear the
I could have sworn it was the first of February and not the first of
April.
--
andynormancx
Yes, it will. Yes, all of them. Yes, SoftSqueeze as well. What ?
I SAID ALL OF THEM !
andynormancx's Profile:
andynormancx;607480 Wrote:
I could have sworn it was the first of February and not the first of
April.
you made my day ;-)
--
garym
garym's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=17325
View this
Maybe Windows and Linux use different default MTU sizes resulting in
different timing behaviour of the Touches network chip? If that is the
cause, then tweaking the linux parameters might help.
Where on former mods I didn't believe that they could cause any audible
difference - here we at least
bluegaspode;607489 Wrote:
Maybe Windows and Linux use different default MTU sizes resulting in
different timing behaviour of the Touches network chip? If that is the
cause, then tweaking the linux parameters might help.
Where on former mods I didn't believe that they could cause any
paulster;607477 Wrote:
It's quite entertaining to hear the non-technical put their own spin on
something which is quite absolute. The DTS test is all you need to
verify that this is complete tripe, without getting into the
technicalities of the OSI and hardware abstraction models and then
paulster;607495 Wrote:
The incoming data hits a not-insubstantial buffer though, so the MTU and
timing of the data won't make a jot of difference unless the buffer
empties.
Nah - regardless of the buffer size, the new packets are still arriving
on the network card and might effect timing on
chill;607504 Wrote:
Indeed - I've noticed the same thing, so for most of the time the player
is probably simply playing out the contents of the buffer. I can't be
sure, but it doesn't seem as though there is a continuous stream of
data to the player, but rather an occasional spurt of data to
chill;607504 Wrote:
Indeed - I've noticed the same thing, so for most of the time the player
is probably simply playing out the contents of the buffer. I can't be
sure, but it doesn't seem as though there is a continuous stream of
data to the player, but rather an occasional spurt of data to
Does that short spike occur about 10 seconds before the end of the
track, as opposed to at the very end of the track? That would make
sense, because I believe SBS sends the next track into the SB's buffer
when there are 10 seconds left on the current track (which is why, for
instance, it is
Those who have complete disdain for that superstitious scientific stuff
may want to check out this new product from Machina Dynamica...
Machina Dynamica's latest product, Codename Blue Meanies, is a set of
4 adhesive-backed 3/4 blue dots that are attached to the walls of the
listening room, one
Phil Leigh;607469 Wrote:
I realise y'all aren't wi-fi fans, but you should try comparing the
sound of the IP packets sent to the Touch via Windows to those from OSX
AND linux over wi-fi...
Even with all the flaws related to a wired connection being untouched,
the wireless connection was
bluegaspode;607503 Wrote:
Trust your ears!
Just yesterday I also read an article that lossless compressed audio
files flatten the sound compared to their lossless uncompressed
counterparts.
If you don't try this yourself you will never believe it though.
Great that you read an
paulster;607477 Wrote:
I'm waiting to hear that Cisco switches sound better than Nortel, which
of course is going to sound better than Netgear or D-Link.
It's quite entertaining to hear the non-technical put their own spin on
something which is quite absolute. The DTS test is all you need
Greg Erskine;607542 Wrote:
When I monitor my network traffic on my PC I get a continuous 1%
utilization while each track is playing. At the end of the track
utilizatiom drops to zero then there is a short spike of 12% or so,
then it flatlines to 1%.
I assume this is the traffic from PC to
dsdreamer;606323 Wrote:
Holding down the little reset button for 5 seconds so that all
firmware and settings are restored. I found that if you let the
firmware upgrade happen with Soundcheck's mods left in place you get a
into an undefined state where some of the mods are over-written and
soundcheck;605316 Wrote:
BTW:
Did you do factory reset before you upgraded?
Is Reset Player Preferences from the Settings menu sufficient, or
does it require a real hardware reset?
--
tonyptony
tonyptony's Profile:
tonyptony;606274 Wrote:
Is Reset Player Preferences from the Settings menu sufficient, or does
it require a real hardware reset?
Holding down the little reset button for 5 seconds so that all
firmware and settings are restored. I found that if you let the
firmware upgrade happen with
@Phil Leigh. Thanks for taking time to do careful measurements. Some of
us a extremely interested to see measured data, whether it confirms our
subjective impressions or otherwise.
--
dsdreamer
--
Dreamer, easy in the chair that really fits you...
I'm pretty active since years on Audio Asylum and DIY-Audio.
Just a side note - the way I see certain things:
Audio Asylum is used by some manufactures as a marketing platform --
same over here, different people though. (perhaps those manufacturers
havn't even realized that ;) )
Just by being
Phil Leigh;605620 Wrote:
As far as I can see, nobody has yet presented any measurements...
therefore nobody has yet attempted to interpret them...
That's an excellent point. Thanks for bringing it up. This gives me
(hopefully) an opportunity to revise my statements: in the absence of
magiccarpetride;605943 Wrote:
For example, we have recently had one member here calling bullshit on
Soundcheck's mods because he claims that he is a computer programmer
and that, from the standpoint of the source code, there couldn't
possibly be any differences.
That's what I call
Good Post Alex.
--
Gazjam
Gazjam's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=18604
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=84742
___
chill;605976 Wrote:
Perhaps you, with your years of professional programming experience,
would like to point me in the right direction in understanding how that
mod can have an effect.
I don't explain them, I just enjoy them.
chill;605976 Wrote:
Now that's a clever attempt to make a valid
magiccarpetride;605303 Wrote:
Thanks again, Klaus. So now with all these mods, is it true that the
only unconquered territory on the Touch is the fact that the screen,
even though disabled, is still operating in the 'touch sensitive' mode?
How do you know?
I guess you didn't follow my
Gazjam;605327 Wrote:
Thanks for that Klaus...
ANOTHER case of RTFM..I didnt do a factory reset first.
Sorry!
*EDIT*
After FActory Reset all is installed as it should be.
Thanks Klaus.
Thanks.
What you're saying is you confirm 100% compatibility of TT2.0 on Touch
Firmware 7.5.3. ?
soundcheck;605482 Wrote:
What you're saying is you confirm 100% compatibility of TT2.0 on Touch
Firmware 7.5.3. ?
Cheers
EXACTLY RIGHT! :)
TTstat shows everything enabled.
ttvol100 works fine too.
--
Gazjam
Hi Magiccarpetride...
a couple of points if I may?
You said:
magiccarpetride;605405 Wrote:
But isn't 'listener own brain' part of what you've labeled here
'objective reality'?
Listener own brain surely is different for everyone...?
We each hear differently and surely we cant tell someone
soundcheck;605472 Wrote:
For now I'd say concentrate on the HW. You can expect similar jumps on
that side.
Key areas are the network and the SPDIF link. And not to forget the
power
supply of course.
I heard my Touch set up with a good linear supply and to my ears there
was a worthwhile
Gazjam;605492 Wrote:
I heard my Touch set up with a good linear supply and to my ears there
was a worthwhile improvement.
Works for me!
You should not write that with a better power supply Touch sounds
better :)
They are some people here, which never heard any difference with a
better ps,
praganj;605505 Wrote:
You should not write that with a better power supply Touch sounds better
:)
They are some people here, which never heard any difference with a
better ps, SW mods, no wlan etc, etc, and this is all your imagination
:)
Are you trying to pick a fight?
Keep it light
praganj;605505 Wrote:
You should not write that with a better power supply Touch sounds better
:)
They are some people here, which never heard any difference with a
better ps, SW mods, no wlan etc, etc, and this is all your imagination
:)
Well if it's his imagination, it's mine too! I
Definately WASN'T my imagination
--
Gazjam
Gazjam's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=18604
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=84742
soundcheck;605472 Wrote:
... I have the great advantage that I'm probably the only non-biased
person around here...
Hmmm...
--
Phil Leigh
You want to see the signal path BEFORE it gets onto a CD/vinyl...it
ain't what you'd call minimal...
Touch(wired/XP) - TACT 2.2X (Linear PSU) + Good
soundcheck;605482 Wrote:
What you're saying is you confirm 100% compatibility of TT2.0 on Touch
Firmware 7.5.3. ?
Cheers
I have re-installed TT2.0 (except for disabling WLAN) after updating
SBS to 7.5.3 and can also confirm that TT2.0 is compatible with this
updated firmware.
Guido F.
Peace out, Gaz! (cool reply, btw:)
Gazjam;605491 Wrote:
Listener own brain surely is different for everyone...?
We each hear differently and surely we cant tell someone else what they
are hearing?
No doubt. Not sure how this happened, but while I was defending my own
right to have different
cool level headed reply.
Kudos.
Lets agree thats its ok to agree to disagree and move on.
:)
Oh, regarding sexual relations...?
ask any woman, she'll be quick to do some measurements!
(not mine though...ahem):)
--
Gazjam
magiccarpetride;605603 Wrote:
...Measuring instruments have nothing on human ability to experience
the world around us. (I'm talking about things that pertain to our
senses)
Humans interpret, measuring instruments don't interpret, they only
measure. It's down to humans to decide how to
Gazjam;605149 Wrote:
Uhm...
I'll just run Erlands patch.
ta.
Or Peterw's?... or go to 7.6
--
Phil Leigh
You want to see the signal path BEFORE it gets onto a CD/vinyl...it
ain't what you'd call minimal...
Touch(wired/XP) - TACT 2.2X (Linear PSU) + Good Vibrations S/W - MF
Gazjam;605149 Wrote:
Uhm...
I'll just run Erlands patch.
ta.
The patch has been download a couple of hundred times. It should work.
You can run e.g.:
which ttvol100
to see if the file is there.
In one case it happened that tar archives got corrupted. In such a case
you just download and
soundcheck;605158 Wrote:
The patch has been download a couple of hundred times. It should work.
You can run e.g.:
which ttvol100
to see if the file is there.
In one case it happened that tar archives got corrupted. In such a case
you just download and reinstall it again. Make sure
Gazjam;605173 Wrote:
Is 7.6 is a stable enough state Phil, as its still beta?
ta.
well, it all depends. I've been running it for many months now without
any serious or persistent issues. But... I have a vanilla setup with
few plugins, XP (SP3) flac+mp3 only.
7.6 certainly performs faster for
Phil Leigh;605177 Wrote:
well, it all depends. I've been running it for many months now without
any serious or persistent issues. But... I have a vanilla setup with
few plugins, XP (SP3) flac+mp3 only.
7.6 certainly performs faster for me on scans and in general browsing
(I use the web ui
1 - 100 of 262 matches
Mail list logo
