In regards to the Perry / Dave exchange, I would like to say that I greatly
appreciate Dave's participation on TruthTalk. I have learned a lot about
Mormonism because of his presence here. I have read dozens of books and
studied numerous aspects of Mormonism because of his posts. I have
appr
DAVEH: Ouuch!!! What are you trying to do to me,
DavidMstab me in the back? You are just feeding more fuel to fire
Perry's argument :-D
BTWWhat are you doing up so late? Don't you know it is
going to make you miss Sunday School tomorrow! :-)
Davi
Well, what do we learn here? That David prefers Dave. Sorry Perry - I did have to laugh a little
at this one.
JD -Original Message-From: David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sun, 29 May 2005 02:22:51 -0400Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs Dave
ere? That David prefers Dave. Sorry
Perry - I did have to laugh a little
at this one.
JD
-Original Message-
From: David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Sun, 29 May 2005 02:22:51 -0400
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
In rega
-- but neither do I questioned Perry's.
JD -Original Message-From: Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]innglory.orgSent: Sun, 29 May 2005 09:11:22 -0700Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
DAVEH: Hmm...I've got a bit different perspective of
DAVEH:
> Ouuch!!! What are you trying to do
> to me, DavidMstab me in the back? You are
> just feeding more fuel to fire Perry's argument
> :-D
Sorry about that Dave. I just wanted you to know that I appreciate the
quotes from Mormon Scriptures and the time you take to ex
ent: Sun, 29 May 2005 02:22:51 -0400
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
In regards to the Perry / Dave exchange, I would like to say that I greatly
appreciate Dave's participation on TruthTalk. I have learned a lot about
Mormonism because of his presence here. I have read dozens of books
I understand. My remarks went more to syle than substnce. I do think David is about to convert.
Jd -Original Message-From: Charles Perry Locke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sun, 29 May 2005 13:25:16 -0700Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
Ac
DAVEH: My reasons for posting my reply to Perry's private comments on
TT was to show that there may be reason for both of us having the views
we do without either of us needing to be shown to be lying. As I now
believe, I think Perry simply misunderstood something I posted some
time ago, and
DAVEH: I appreciate your kind words, DavidM. And, my pain was
punctuated with a big old laughing smiley, so I really didn't think you
were trying to draw blood while you had the knife plunged to the
hilt.at least you weren't twisting it! :-)
I hadn't planned on changing the way
I vote for (4) Get saved and talk about
the REAL Jesus! J Izzy
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dave
Sent: Sunday, May 29, 2005 4:24 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs
DaveH
DAVEH: I appreciate your kind
: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
>Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
>Date: Sun, 29 May 2005 08:08:32 -0400
>
>Well, what do we learn here? That David prefers Dave. Sorry Perry - I did
>have to laugh a little
>at this one.
>JD
>
>-Original Message-
>From: David
Izzy, Since I know others on TT have contributed, I intentionally used the
indefinite "who... may not have otherwise given it a second thought" to
exclude them.
From: "ShieldsFamily" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To:
Subject: RE: [Trut
DAVEH: I appreciate your concern for my eternal welfare, Izzy. Would
it be OK with you if I first endure to the end before getting saved, as
the Savior suggested?
ShieldsFamily wrote:
I vote for
(4) Get saved and talk about
the REAL Jesus! J Izzy
--
No. You must endure to the end “in
Christ”. Enduring to the end in JSmith doesn’t cut it. Sorry. Iz
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dave
Sent: Sunday, May 29, 2005 11:36
PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs
DaveH
DAVEH: Do you suppose enduring to the end of TT would qualify!
;-)
ShieldsFamily wrote:
No. You
must endure to the end “in
Christ”. Enduring to the end in JSmith doesn’t cut it. Sorry. Iz
DAVEH: I appreciate your
concern for my eternal
we
Only to condemn those who heard the truth but did not heed it.
Iz
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave
HansenSent: Tuesday, May 31, 2005 12:19 AMTo:
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs
DaveH
DAVEH: Do you suppose enduring to the
DAVEH: The problem as I see it, who is the arbiter of truth on TT,
Izzy. Is there anybody here you would say expounds nothing but truth?
ShieldsFamily wrote:
Only to condemn those who heard the truth
but did not heed it. Iz
DAVEH: Do you suppose enduring to the end of T
@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs
DaveH
DAVEH: The problem as I see it, who is the arbiter of
truth on TT, Izzy. Is there anybody here you would say expounds nothing
but truth?ShieldsFamily wrote:
Only to condemn those who heard the truth but did not heed it.
Iz
DAVEH
I agree, Izzy, and by now you should know that the Church of Jesus Christ
of Latter-day Saints teaches enduring to the end IN CHRIST--only. You have
unfortunately fallen under the very bad influence
of those blind guides who teach the traditions and
commandments of men, mixed with a few s
: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs
DaveH
I agree, Izzy, and by now you should know
that the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints teaches enduring to the
end IN CHRIST--only. You have unfortunately fallen under the very
bad influence of those blind guides who teach the
traditions and
neither do they desire that she should rule over them. (BoM, Mosiah 8:20-21)
Who is SHE?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree, Izzy, and by now you should know that the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints teaches enduring to the end IN CHRIST--only. You have unfortunately fallen under the
ghter. Joe tried it all, he was a PERVERT who liked little girls.
ShieldsFamily <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Please dont quote B.M. to me. It means nothing as it was written by a crafty, adulterous man named Joseph Smith. Izzy
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 17:19:13 EDT
I agree, Izzy, and by now you should know that the Church of Jesus Christ
of
Latter-day Saints teaches enduring to the end IN CHRIST
In a message dated 5/31/2005 6:19:18 PM Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Please don’t quote
B.M. to me. It means nothing as it was written by a crafty, adulterous
man named Joseph Smith. Izzy
I won't! (Not unless I see something that really
is unsettling to all yo
Wasn't he and his brother short to death during a gun fight in some two story house -- kinda of like Moses (?)
JD -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 01:36:08 EDTSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
onstrate my point. Does this 'count'?
- Original Message -
From: "Charles Perry Locke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: June 01, 2005 01:03
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
> Blaine,
>
>You have to have the right jesus, or it does not count. The bible is
>
Satan is an imitator. And a liar. So was
JS. He never entered into The Kingdom for sure. Izzy
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2005 11:36
PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry
ly-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To:
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 05:45:32 -0400
CPL:Jus how nuanced would you make this out to be vis a vis 'the right
Jesus'? Would you acknowledge that David Miller's "Jesus' was not the
Jesus
of Bill Taylor
DAVEH: I'm not exactly sure of your question, Lance.But as I view
it, the position of many TTers is analogous to the Jews of Bible
times. In the OT, Scripture gave them a perception of God to which the
staunchly held. So firm in their convictions (as are many TTers), they
had trouble ack
id Miller's "Jesus' was not the Jesusof Bill Taylor? IMO this is so. Should you doubt this I could call BT 'upfrom the dead' to so demonstrate my point. Does this 'count'?- Original Message - From: "Charles Perry Locke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: Se
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Charles Perry Locke
Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005 7:04 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
Lance, we have a standard for determining the right Jesus and the right God.
It is the Bible.
2005 10:06
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs
DaveH
DAVEH: I'm not exactly sure of your question,
Lance.But as I view it, the position of many TTers is analogous to the
Jews of Bible times. In the OT, Scripture gave them a perception of God
to which the staunchly held. So fir
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2005 11:36 PMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
In a message dated 5/31/2005 6:19:18 PM Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Please dont quote B.M. to me. It means nothing as it was written by a crafty, adul
il.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
In a message dated 5/31/2005 6:19:18 PM Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Please dont quote B.M. to me. It means nothing as it was written by a crafty, adulterous man named Joseph Smith. Izzy
I won't! (Not unless I see some
Talk@mail.innglory.org
Sent:
June 01, 2005 10:06
Subject:
Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
DAVEH: I'm not exactly sure of your question, Lance.But as I view
it, the position of many TTers is analogous to the Jews of Bible
times. In the OT, Scripture gave them a percepti
nks,
Lance
From:
Dave Hansen
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: June 02, 2005 01:56
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs
DaveH
DAVEH: I'm a little too slow (and too tired) to ascertain
your intended message, Lance. If you want me to understand what you are
tryi
To:
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent:
June 02, 2005 01:56
Subject:
Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
DAVEH: I'm a little too slow (and too tired) to ascertain your
intended message, Lance. If you want me to understand what you are
trying to convey, put it in more simple terms
glory.org
Sent: June 02, 2005 09:58
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs
DaveH
Lance Muir wrote:
DH asks:
1. Did Jesus' ...By some, yes. Your counterpart
would be:The reindentification of 'who jesus is' by JS. One need not extend
this thinking far
thus far. Then, please let me know your
opinion/thoughts.
-
Original Message -
From:
Dave
Hansen
To:
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent:
June 02, 2005 09:58
Subject:
Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
Lance Muir wrote:
In a message dated 6/1/2005 9:09:01 PM Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Satan is an
imitator. And a liar. So was JS. He never entered into The
Kingdom for sure. Izzy
Blaine: Is this your best shot Izzy?
If it is, I'd say you are struggling.
In a message dated 6/1/2005 9:09:01 PM Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
By crafty, I was referring to what I call
Priestcraft
Blaine: Priestcraft is, by my definition, using
preaching and/or teaching the gospel as a means of making a living. Mormon
priests are lay pri
Isaiah 29
11 "And the vision of all is
become unto you as the word of a book that is sealed, which men deliver to one
that is learned, saying, Read this, I pray thee; and he saith, I cannot, for it
is sealed.
12 And the book is delivered to
him that is not learned, saying, Read this
Dave, you are too much of a gentleman to
ever be boring. J Izzy
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dave Hansen
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 9:57
PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs
DaveH
DAVEH: Time is my
I think I also mentioned adulterer. That’s
enough for me. Maybe not for you. Iz
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2005
11:54 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs
DaveH
So then, does worshiping a book make one an idolater? Are such on an equal
footing with a liar? I'm only askin' mind ya.
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: June 03, 2005 01:53
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry v
On considering the source:Every one of us does that when we look at the
source name for a post, do we not?
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: June 03, 2005 02:08
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs
DaveH
In a
Dave Hansen
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: June 02, 2005 23:57
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs
DaveH
DAVEH: Time is my biggest enemy, Lance. I
started a big reply to one of DavidM's posts about 3 or 4 weeks ago, and it is
only half finished. Right now I&#
Blaine wrote:
> When one who practices priestcraft sees his income
> being diminished because his patrons are being converted
> to Mormonism, he strikes out against the religion, hoping
> to destroy it. This is the source of most present-day
> Mormon bashing.
Very interesting thoughts, Blaine. T
Joe was a WARLOCK with all the tools of the craft.
Even SOME Mormons can admit it is so.
http://www.signaturebooks.com/magic.htm
By drawing only on authorized descriptions of the endowment by LDS leaders, I believe it is possible to see within historical context how the Mormon endowment reflected t
I don’t know anyone who worships a
book. Do you? Iz
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Friday, June 03, 2005 4:18
AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs
DaveH
So then, does worshiping a book
This is not a Prophecy of the Book of Mormon.
Read the context Blaine.[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Isaiah 29
11 "And the vision of all is become unto you as the word of a book that is sealed, which men deliver to one that is learned, saying, Read this, I pray thee; and he saith, I cannot, for
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 11:54 PMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
In a message dated 6/1/2005 9:09:01 PM Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Satan is an imitator. And a
]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: June 03, 2005 01:53
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
In a message dated 6/1/2005 9:09:01 PM Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Satan is an imitator. And a liar. So was JS. He never entered into The Kingdom for sure. Izzy
Blaine: I
Yes.
- Original Message -
From:
ShieldsFamily
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: June 03, 2005 08:01
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Perry vs
DaveH
I dont know anyone
who worships a book. Do you? Iz
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Blaine wrote: Priestcraft is, by my definition, ...
Here we go again...the mormons like to make up their own meanings for
words, to suit thier own personal perception of the world. I call this the
"Queen of Hearts" syndrome: "Words mean exactly what I want them to
DAVEH: Izzy...Your kindness is only exceeded by your beauty!
ShieldsFamily wrote:
Dave, you
are too much of a gentleman to
ever be boring. J Izzy
--
~~~
Dave Hansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.langlitz.com
~~~
If you wish to receive
thi
Very interesting but erroneous!
The source for most "Mormon Bashing" is lost income??
One would have to be inculcated with a doctrine that says all "priests" that receive income are an abomination. Thus LDS use LAY workers. I won't call them preachers cause they can't even preach mormonism. I
Paaleezzz. Do your lips crack when puckered that tightly?
JD
:-) -Original Message-From: Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 07:03:28 -0700Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
DAVEH: Izzy.
Congratulations.
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Friday, June 03, 2005 6:34
AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs
DaveH
Yes.
- Original Message -
From: ShieldsFamily
Dave might just win a free eye exam from
my Hubby! J Iz
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 03, 2005 11:03
AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs
DaveH
: ShieldsFamily <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 13:23:30 -0500Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
Dave might just win a free eye exam from my Hubby! J Iz
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Friday
In a message dated 6/1/2005 1:34:33 PM Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The
mormons have their JSmith; the J.Witnesses have their CT Russell,
theChristian Scientists have their Mary Baker Eddy; the RCC's have their
Pope,and the Incarnationalists have their "Bishop".
So, what is your definition of "priestcraft," Perry?
Blaine
In a message dated 6/3/2005 7:17:13 AM Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Blaine wrote: Priestcraft is, by my
definition, ... Here we go again...the mormons like to
make up their
Behalf Of Lance
MuirSent: Friday, June 03,
2005 4:18 AMTo:
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs
DaveH
So then, does
worshiping a book make one an idolater? Are such on an equal footing with a
liar? I'm only askin' mind ya.
Blaine wrote:
> You are using the "guilt by association" approach
> to reasoning, which is false reasoning, and shameful
> for anyone to have to resort to it.
Are you sure that "guilt by association" is false reasoning? Don't you use
the same reasoning in the very next sentence?
Blaine wrote:
>
ends what will matter is whether or
not Jesus identifies you as a Christian.
- Original Message -
From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: June 04, 2005 08:39
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
> Blaine wrote:
> > You are using the "guilt by
Lance wrote:
> We may have unamimity on my next observation (?):
> At the end of all ends what will matter is whether
> or not Jesus identifies you as a Christian.
Amen, Lance. Well said. Whether or not we know Jesus is not nearly as
important as whether or not Jesus knows us.
Peace be with yo
truction.
JD
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 01:29:00 EDTSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
In a message dated 6/1/2005 1:34:33 PM Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The mormons have their JSmit
Blaine, it’s only “shameful
if I’m wrong”. And I’m not. One day you will wish
with all your heart that you had heeded the warnings you have been given here
on TT. Izzy
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You are using the "guil
David has given you a more appropriate answer than
Izzie but, she has a good heart? (I think so, anyway)
- Original Message -
From:
ShieldsFamily
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: June 04, 2005 10:44
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Perry vs
DaveH
Blaine, it
t: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 01:37:52 EDT
So, what is your definition of "priestcraft," Perry?
Blaine
In a message dated 6/3/2005 7:17:13 AM Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Blaine wrote: Priestcraft is, by my defini
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mester
Blaine: Jesus, indeed, is the same. The notion that he has spoken in
this dispensation is apparently given credence (in your thinking)
because of the claim to fame
-- 4th largest denomination. What does the comparison of numbers mean
when you compa
Lance Muir wrote:
David has given you a more
appropriate answer than Izzie but, she has a good heart? (I think so,
anyway)
===
Izzy is the re-incarnation of miss Kitty on Gunsmoke. Tough as nails,
heart of gold. Wi
=
Well done, John!! Especially that last sentence.
Terry
Ditto! Iz
0:02
AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs
DaveH
Mester Blaine: Jesus, indeed, is the
same. The notion that he has spoken in this dispensation is
apparently given credence (in your thinking) because of the claim to fame -- 4th largest
denomination. What does the comparison
DAVEH: Denial granted.
Does Izzy not shine so brightly that you cannot see her luster,
John?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ahh -- so it was grafted that served as the
motivation. Of course DAvH will deny tis -- but the facts are now
on the table.
Another reason
This goes on a wall in a frame !!! Thank you. -Original Message-From: David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 14:06:50 -0400Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
I think I am going to like the "new John.&
DAVEH: According to the dictionary definition, it's obvious Blaine was
not making it up as your below assertion,
Perry
...Will Blaine receive a forthcoming apology?
Charles Perry Locke wrote:
I never use the term, and have no definition. But if I
wanted one I would see if there
DAVEH: FWIW Perry, you may be the one trying to change the culture (see below), so to speak. As I pointed out,
there are many definitions of teach, but the one I feel is appropriate
for TT agrees with what DavidM posted today about the meaning of
teaching (sermonizing)..
DavidM wrote:
A
erry
From: Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2005 12:33:09 -0700
DAVEH: According to the dictionary definition, it's obvious Blaine was not
making it up as your below as
Dave, pick a definition, any definition. Just don't pick one that labels
what you do as "teaching".
From: Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2005 13:06:0
DAVEH: I seeyou want to define teaching by using me as an example,
eh Perry. Instead of spinning it that way, I chose to use a definition
consistent with my perception of what teaching means to TTers. You
might consider it to be culturally and contextually more meaningful.
Charles Perry
tion of
Priestcraft is" I could not have made the assertion I made.
Perry
From: Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2005 12:33:09 -0700
The sodomites are growing fast are they right too?
Jo was not guilty by association, but by his own IMMORAL behavior![EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 6/1/2005 1:34:33 PM Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The mormons have their JSmith; the J.Witnesses have their CT Ru
It is the ENEMIES of the Cross that are headed to Destruction that should be ASHAMED. Phil 3:18-19ShieldsFamily <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Blaine, its only shameful if Im wrong. And Im not. One day you will wish with all your heart that you had heeded the warnings you have been give
or " the definition of Priestcraft is" I could not have made the assertion I made. Perry
From: Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2005 12:33:09 -0700 DAVEH: Accor
Lance, You seem capable of objective thought, so you earn an "A" for that,
at least, in my little mental roll book.
Blaine
In a message dated 6/4/2005 7:14:39 AM Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lance
wrote:> We may have unamimity on my next observation (?):> At
t
David,
Hmm, I see your point, but yours is a special case, wouldn't you say?
I have to say your point is actually weak. Associatiing JS with
other false priests, is a bad association no matter how you look at
it. JS gave dates, descriptions of what took place, etc, which
none of thes
I'd hate to judge these people as being falsely motivated.
Just those people?
No problem accusing others of false motivation. Do you have a special gift?[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David,
Hmm, I see your point, but yours is a special case, wouldn't you say? I have to say your point is actual
ience such that it enables you to set aside every other
consideration concerning LDS?
-
Original Message -
From:
Dave
Hansen
To:
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent:
June 02, 2005 23:57
Subject:
Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
DAVEH: Time is my bi
@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
DAVEH: The problem as I see it, who is the arbiter of truth on TT,
Izzy. Is there anybody here you would say expounds nothing but truth?
ShieldsFamily wrote:
Only to condemn those who heard the truth
but did not heed
ion?
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: June 05, 2005 22:09
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs
DaveH
David,
Hmm, I see your point, but yours is a special case, wouldn't you say?
I have to say your point
Read my post to Blaine.
- Original Message -
From:
Dave Hansen
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: June 06, 2005 02:44
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs
DaveH
DAVEH: ??? Please restate it so a simple
minded guy (like me) can understand your question
Because men love darkness so much that they will not
come to the light so that their deeds may be made
manifest.
On Sun, 05 Jun 2005 23:49:00 -0700 Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
The Bible
speaks for itself.DAVEH: Are you sure
about that, Izzy??? If so, why are there so
05:07
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs
DaveH
Because men love darkness so much that they will not
come to the light so that their deeds may be made
manifest.
On Sun, 05 Jun 2005 23:49:00 -0700 Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
The Bible
speaks for itself.D
The Bible does speak for itself to those who are
willing to come to the light and agree with Him, covenanting
to follow Him and to do things His way rather than take
on a form of godliness in His name.
On Mon, 6 Jun 2005 05:26:58 -0400 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
The Bible do
hTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: June 06, 2005 05:42
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs
DaveH
The Bible does speak for itself to those who are
willing to come to the light and agree with Him, covenanting
to follow Him and to do things His way r
All TT demonstrates is that different ppl are at
different places in their pilgrimage through this world. Some
are entering the Kingdom and others have chosen a
different path. You need to read the parable fo the
wheat and the tares Lance. There are a
lot of tares around, so what does their
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs
DaveH
All TT demonstrates is that different ppl are at
different places in their pilgrimage through this world. Some
are entering the Kingdom and others have chosen a
different path. You need to read the parable fo the
wheat and the tares Lanc
1 - 100 of 264 matches
Mail list logo
