Once again, let's move this to U2- Community.
/To subscribe to the u2-users or u2-community mailing lists or digest lists,
send one or more of the following lines in the BODY (not the subject) of an
email addressed to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
subscribe u2-users
subscribe u2-users-digest
-Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Frost, Bodo
> Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2004 6:56 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [U2] The list format and usefulness
>
>
> Les,
>
> Many thanks for your reply on this '
AIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2004 11:15 AM
Subject: RE: [U2] The list format and usefulness
> My $0.02
>
> I strongly disagree with this approach.
>
> 1) I think you would lose some valuable and useful responses as not all
> summaries will be posted
>
> 2)
mber 2004 06:31
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [U2] The list format and usefulness
David,
What I do is subscribe to both the list and the digest. That way I can
skim and delete the individual messages as they come in (from the list),
still have all the content if I need it later (from the digest). To
alous, especially excessively so.
A fanatically committed person.
Allen
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Richard Taylor
Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2004 08:15
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [U2] The list format and usefulness
My $0.02
I s
uot;3 more days work to go"
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Charles Barouch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: 21 December 2004 06:31
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [U2] The list format and usefulness
>
>
>David,
>What I do is subscribe to both the list an
t;The more they complicate the plumbing
the easier it is to stop up the drain"
- Montgomery Scott NCC-1701
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Logan, David (SST
- Adelaide)
Sent: Monday, December 20, 2004 7:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subj
> > Perhaps one solution (and I should take my own advice) is to read
through
> > the existing responses and only provide a new or unique answer. Thus,
the
> > post will get one occurrence of '4' instead of 20.
> there are still times I reply to the only item in my inbox and then due
to
> list-la
I finally got myself about 75% disciplined in that approach, Mark. It
really helped (at least in cutting down how much I reply to). But there
are still times I reply to the only item in my inbox and then due to
list-lag (unavoidable), don't see my reply for a couple of hours. In the
meantime, s
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Logan, David
>(SST - Adelaide)
>Sent: Monday, December 20, 2004 11:14 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: [U2] The list format and usefulness
>
>
>Hi Bruce,
>
>Your po
Clif <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 20 Dec 2004 21:31:17 -0800
> Full content. A lot of times watching how someone else is
> thinking is more instructive than what they are thinking.
I wholeheartedly agree! I subscribe only to the digests, in part from
being distracted 100 times a day, but mo
cent.
- Original Message -
From: "Norman Morgan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2004 8:52 AM
Subject: RE: [U2] The list format and usefulness
> > 1) stops arguments on the relative benefits of a GOTO over a LOOP for
> >
> 1) stops arguments on the relative benefits of a GOTO over a LOOP for
> the 53rd time. (30 replies on the last one).
I'll agree with you here.
> 2) stops multiple answers clogging bandwidth of everybody on the list.
> eg. being told how to MAT var = '' 9 times.
Let's think this one through a b
D]
Subject: Re: [U2] The list format and usefulness
David,
What I do is subscribe to both the list and the digest. That way I can
skim and delete the individual messages as they come in (from the list),
still have all the content if I need it later (from the digest). To
control bandwidth, I have
the various views
most interesting and would rather not se it changed.
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 21 December 2004 09:00
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [U2] The list format and usefulness
David,
I
David,
I enjoy the multiple responses on the list. Often there is more than one
way to skin a cat and that is reflected in the number of answers. Even
if not, it is good to know that people are listening and prepared to
respond. I would not like to see any changes that discourgage people
from resp
David,
What I do is subscribe to both the list and the digest. That way I can
skim and delete the individual messages as they come in (from the list),
still have all the content if I need it later (from the digest). To
control bandwidth, I have them going to two different names, so I can
opt to
Full content. A lot of times watching how someone else is thinking is
more instructive than what they are thinking.
For a problem, an answer is enough. To learn how to solve a class of
problems, watching the process that more experienced (or even just
different) techs go through is an education
Mobile
+61 8 8408 4259 - Fax
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 21 December 2004 11:50 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [U2] The list format and usefulness
In a message dated 12/20/2004 7:40:32 PM Eastern Stan
Goo'day, again, David,
At 15:13 21/12/04 +1100, you wrote:
Hi Bruce,
Do you really want the "full" content or do you want the answer? I don't
disagree about Ray W's postings however it stops all the out of office
messages along with a large number of tit for tat postings.
Is filtering out the OOO's
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bruce Nichol
Sent: Tuesday, 21 December 2004 12:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [U2] The list format and usefulness
Goo'day, David,
At 11:40 21/12/04 +1100, you wrote:
>Hi Folks,
>
>After beco
er 2004 11:50 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [U2] The list format and usefulness
In a message dated 12/20/2004 7:40:32 PM Eastern Standard Time, "Logan,
David (SST - Adelaide)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>With a number of other groups, a different format is use
Goo'day, David,
At 11:40 21/12/04 +1100, you wrote:
Hi Folks,
After becoming a little frustrated of seeing and reading the same old
stuff, day in and day out, and IMHO the list not having the same useful
content as previously, I have number of suggestions.
With a number of other groups, a different
In a message dated 12/20/2004 7:40:32 PM Eastern Standard Time, "Logan, David
(SST - Adelaide)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>With a number of other groups, a different format is used, a question is
>asked, replies are sent directly to the person asking the question and
>this person then summ
Hi Folks,
After becoming a little frustrated of seeing and reading the same old
stuff, day in and day out, and IMHO the list not having the same useful
content as previously, I have number of suggestions.
With a number of other groups, a different format is used, a question is
asked, replies are
25 matches
Mail list logo
