e
> main reason for the option "Reset seeding" was for that, for reevaluating
> all pages, as a new fresh execution.
>
>
> On Tue, 26 Sept 2023 at 13:30, Karl Wright wrote:
>
>> Okay, that is good to know.
>> The hopcount assessment occurs when documents a
can think on is creating a new job with the exact same
> characteristics and run it.
>
> Regards and thanks
>Marisol
>
>
>
> On Tue, 26 Sept 2023 at 12:35, Karl Wright wrote:
>
>> If you ever set "Ignore unreachable documents forever" for the job, you
>>
If you ever set "Ignore unreachable documents forever" for the job, you
can't go back and stop ignoring them. The data that the job would need to
have recorded for this is gone. The only way to get it back is if you can
convince the ManifoldCF to recrawl all documents in the job.
On Tue, Sep
See this article:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/6784463/error-trustanchors-parameter-must-be-non-empty
ManifoldCF web crawler configuration allows you to drop certs into a local
trust store for the connection. You need to either do that (adding
whatever certificate authority cert you
Karl Wright wrote:
> The Solr output connection configuration contains all credentials that are
> sent to Solr. If those aren't set Solr won't get them.
>
> Karl
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 7:23 AM Marisol Redondo <
> marisol.redondo.gar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
The Solr output connection configuration contains all credentials that are
sent to Solr. If those aren't set Solr won't get them.
Karl
On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 7:23 AM Marisol Redondo <
marisol.redondo.gar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are using Solr 8 with basic authentication, and when
The jcifs connector does not include a lot of information in the version
string for a file - basically, the length, and the modified date. So I
would not expect there to be lot of actual work involved if there are no
changes to a document.
The activity "access" does imply that the system
at 5:41 AM Rasťa Šíša wrote:
> Hi Karl, thanks for your answer! Would you be able to point me towards the
> author/git branch of the documentum connector?
> Best regards, Rasta
>
> čt 16. 3. 2023 v 20:58 odesílatel Karl Wright napsal:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I d
Hi,
I didn't write the documentum connector initially, so I trust that the
engineer who did knew how to construct the proper DQL. I've not seen any
bugs related to it so it does seem to work.
Karl
On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 8:23 AM Rasťa Šíša wrote:
> Hello,
> i would like to ask how does
break;
> ...
> }
> ...
> }
> }
> catch (Throwable e)
> {
> ...
> }
> }
> ```
>
> It just breaks the loop making thread terminates normally! In a quite a
> short time I always ends up with no `Do
gt; 0x7f051c50a000,0x7f051c60a000] [id=2537470]
>
>
>
> Stack: [0x7f051c50a000,0x00007f051c60a000], sp=0x7f051c608080,
> free space=1016k
>
> Native frames: (J=compiled Java code, A=aot compiled Java code,
> j=interpreted, Vv=VM code, C=native code)
>
>
Hi,
2.22 makes no changes to the way document deletions are processed over
probably 10 previous versions of ManifoldCF.
What likely is the case is that the connection to the output for the job
you are cleaning up is down. When that happens, the documents are queued
but the delete worker threads
with a retry time.
Karl
On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 6:15 AM Bisonti Mario
wrote:
> Hi Karl.
>
> But I noted that the job was hanging, the document processed was stucked
> on the same number, no further document processing from the 6 a.m until I
> restart Agent
>
>
>
>
&g
Hi, "Possibly transient issue" means that the error will be retried anyway,
according to a schedule. There should not need to be any requirement to
shut down the agents process and restart.
Karl
On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 5:08 AM Bisonti Mario
wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Often, I obtain the error:
>
> WARN
Hmm - I haven't heard of difficulties like this before. The mail manager
is used apache-wide; if it doesn't work the best thing to do would be to
create an infra ticket in JIRA.
Karl
On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 3:50 AM Koji Sekiguchi
wrote:
> Hi Karl, everyone!
>
> I'm writing to the moderator
The internals of ManifoldCF will handle this fine if you are sure to set
the encoding of your database to be UTF-8. However, I don't know about the
JCIFS library, and whether there might be a restriction on characters in
that code base. I think you'd have to just try it and see, frankly.
Karl
You will need to contact the current maintainers of the Jcifs library to
get answers to these questions.
Karl
On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 3:27 AM ritika jain
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have a Windows shared job to crawl files from samba server, it's a huge
> job to crawl documents in millions(about
elete, considering of course
> > the things that need to be deleted with them (BD, etc). Do you think
> this is possible?
> > We think that not only us but the community would be benefited from this
> kind of functionality.
> >
> > Ricardo.
> >
> > On Mon
Because ManifoldCF is not just a crawler, but a synchonizer, a job
represents and includes a list of documents that have been indexed.
Deleting the job requires deleting the documents that have been indexed
also. It's part of the basic model.
So if you tear down your target output instance and
" repeated service interruption" means that it happens again and again.
For this particular document, the problem is that the error we are seeing
is: "The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another
process."
ManifoldCF assumes that if it retries enough it should be able
We cannot do back patches of older versions of ManifoldCF. There is a new
release which shipped in January that addresses log4j issues. I suggest
updating to that.
Karl
On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 8:59 AM ritika jain
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> How manifoldcf uses log4j files in bin
As I've mentioned before, the best way to diagnose problems like this is to
get a thread dump of the agents process. There are many potential reasons
it could occur, ranging from stuck locks to resource starvation. What
locking model are you using?
Karl
On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 6:02 AM ritika
ManifoldCF framework and connectors use log4j 2.x to dump information to
the ManifoldCF log file.
Please read the following page:
https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/security.html
Specifically, this part:
'Descripton: Apache Log4j2 <=2.14.1 JNDI features used in configuration,
log messages,
The degree of parallelism can be controlled in two ways.
The first way is to set the number of worker threads to something
reasonable. Usually, this is no more than about 2x the number of
processors you have.
The second way is to control the number of connections in your jcifs
connector to keep
T,status=0,flags=0x0000,mid=4,wordCount=0,byteCount=72
> at
> jcifs.util.transport.Transport.waitForResponses(Transport.java:365)
> at jcifs.util.transport.Transport.sendrecv(Transport.java:232)
> at jcifs.smb.SmbTransportImpl.sendrecv(SmbTransportImpl
One hour is quite a lot and will wreak havoc on the document queue.
Karl
On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 7:08 AM ritika jain wrote:
> I have checked, there is only one hour time difference between docker
> container and docker host
>
> On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 4:41 PM Karl Wright wrote:
If your docker image's clock is out of sync badly with the real world, then
System.currentTimeMillis() may give bogus values, and ManifoldCF uses that
to manage throttling etc. I don't know if that is the correct explanation
but it's the only thing I can think of.
Karl
On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at
the same problem.
If the problem IS repeatable, we will of course look deeper into what is
going on.
Karl
On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 9:52 AM Karl Wright wrote:
> Is it repeatable? My guess is it is not repeatable.
> Karl
>
> On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 4:43 AM ritika jain
> wrote:
&
Is it repeatable? My guess is it is not repeatable.
Karl
On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 4:43 AM ritika jain
wrote:
> So , it can be left as it is.. ? because it is preventing job to complete
> and its stopping.
>
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 8:40 PM Karl Wright wrote:
>
>> That's
That's a database bug. All of our underlying databases have some bugs of
this kind.
Karl
On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 9:17 AM ritika jain
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> While using Manifoldcf 2.14 with Web connector and ES connector. After a
> certain time of continuing the job (jobs ingest some documents
The only limit is that the more you add, the slower it gets.
Karl
On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 6:06 AM ritika jain
wrote:
> Hi ,
> Is there any limit on the number of paths we can define in job using
> Repository as Window Shares and ES as Output
>
> Thanks
>
The API should really catch this situation. Basically, you are calling a
function that requires an input but you are not providing one. In that
case the API sets the input to "null", and the detailed operation is
called. The detailed operation is not expecting a null input.
This is API piece
Hi,
You say this is a "Tika error". Is this Tika as a stand-alone service? I
do not recognize any ManifoldCF classes whatsoever in this thread dump.
If this is Tika, I suggest contacting the Tika team.
Karl
On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 3:02 AM Bisonti Mario
wrote:
> Additional info.
>
>
>
> I
This is something you should contact the Tika project about.
Karl
On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 8:46 AM ritika jain wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am using tika-core 1.21 and tika-parsers 1.21 jar files as tika
> dependencies in Manifoldcf 2.14 version.
> Getting some issues while parsing *PDF *files. Some
I have a work day today, with limited time.
The UI is what it is; it does not have capabilities beyond what is stated
in the UI and in the manual. It's meant to allow construction of paths
piece by piece, not by full subdirectory at a time.
You can obviously use the API if you want to construct
Yes, when you delete a job, the indexed documents associated with that job
are removed from the index.
ManifoldCF is a synchronizer, not a crawler, so when you remove the
synchronization job then if it didn't delete the indexed documents they
would be left dangling.
Karl
On Thu, Aug 12, 2021
t;_attribute_indexable":"yes","_attribute_filespec":"\/*.docb","_value_":"","_attribute_type":"file"},{"_attribute_indexable":"yes","_attribute_filespec":"\/*.dot","_value_&q
I am sorry, but I'm having trouble understanding how exactly you are
configuring the JCIFS connector in these two cases.Can you view the job
in each case and provide cut-and-paste of the view?
Karl
On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 9:09 AM ritika jain
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am using Window shares
+;
> return new
>
> UrlsetContextClass(theStream,namespace,localName,qName,atts,documentURI,handler);
>}
>
> So, my question is: is there another way to handle sitemaps inside the
> Web Crawler?
>
> Cheers Sebastian
>
>
>
>
>
> Am 07
The robots parsing does not recognize the "sitemaps" line, which was likely
not in the spec for robots when this connector was written.
Karl
On Wed, Jul 7, 2021 at 3:31 AM h0444xk8 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a general question. Is the Web connector supporting sitemap files
> referenced by the
302 does get recognized as a redirection, yes
On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 5:07 AM ritika jain
wrote:
> Is the process the same when fetch/process status code returned is 302 ?
When running a job with web crawler and ES output connector
>>>
> can anybody have a clue about this
>
ManifoldCF reads all the URLs on its queue.
If it's a 301, it detects this and pushes the new URL onto the document
queue.
When it gets to the new URL, it processes it like any other.
Karl
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 8:32 AM ritika jain
wrote:
> Hi
>
> I want to understand the process of "How
e job or crashing manifold
>
> On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 1:34 PM Karl Wright wrote:
>
>> '
>>
>> *JCIFS: Possibly transient exception detected on attempt 1 while getting
>> share security'Yes, it is going to retry.*
>>
>> *Karl*
>>
>>
'
*JCIFS: Possibly transient exception detected on attempt 1 while getting
share security'Yes, it is going to retry.*
*Karl*
On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 1:45 AM ritika jain
wrote:
> Hi,
> I am using Windows shares connector in manifoldcf 2.14 and ElasticSearch
> connector as Output connector and
This used to work fine, but I suspect that when SSH was declared unsafe, it
was disabled, and now only TLS will work.
Karl
On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 12:13 PM wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> I am trying to use an email notification connector but without success.
> When the connector tries to send an
Hi,
There was a book written but never published on ManifoldCF and how to write
connectors. It's meant to be extended in that way. The PDFs for the book
are available for free online, and they are linked through the manifoldcf
web site.
Karl
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 8:49 AM koch wrote:
> Hi
Hi Ritika,
There is no deletion process. Deletion takes place when a job is run in a
mode where deletion is possible (there are some where it is not). The way
it takes place depends on the kind of repository connector (what model it
declares itself to use).
For the most common kinds of
to be sure that the connector
works with most versions of ElasticSearch? Please help clarify so that I
can finish this off.
The changes are committed to trunk; I would be very appreciative if Shirai
Takashi/ 白井隆 reviewed them there.Thanks!
Karl
On Sat, Mar 20, 2021 at 4:32 AM Karl Wright wrot
.
There are more changes in these patches than just the ID length issue. I
am working to add this functionality as well but without anything I would
consider to be unneeded.
Karl
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 3:48 AM Karl Wright wrote:
> Thanks for the information. I'll see what I can do.
>
Thanks for the information. I'll see what I can do.
Karl
On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 7:23 PM Shirai Takashi/ 白井隆
wrote:
> Hi, Karl.
>
> Karl Wright wrote:
> >Hi - I'm still waiting for this patch to be attached to a ticket. That is
> >the only way I believe we're allowed
Hi - I'm still waiting for this patch to be attached to a ticket. That is
the only way I believe we're allowed to accept it legally.
Karl
On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 7:16 PM Shirai Takashi/ 白井隆
wrote:
> Hi, Karl.
>
> Karl Wrightさんは書きました:
> >I agree it is unlikely that the JDK wi
I agree it is unlikely that the JDK will lose support for SHA-1 because it
is used commonly, as is MD5. So please feel free to use it.
Karl
On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 7:54 PM Shirai Takashi/ 白井隆
wrote:
> Hi, Horn.
>
> Jörn Franke wrote:
> >Makes sense
>
> I don't think that it's easy.
>
>
> >>>
Hi - this is very helpful. I would like you to officially create a ticket
in Jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira , project "CONNECTORS", and attach
these patches. Backwards compatibility means that we very likely have to
use the hash approach, and not use the decoding approach.
Thanks,
Karl
File synchronization is still supported but is deprecated. We recommend
zookeeper synchronization unless you have a very good reason not to.
Karl
On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 12:26 PM Ananth Peddinti wrote:
> Hello Team ,
>
>
> I would like to know if someone has already done multi-process model
ue, Feb 16, 2021 at 7:29 PM Karl Wright wrote:
>
>> Hi, do you mean content limiter length of 100?
>>
>> I assume you are using the internal Tika transformer? Are you combining
>> this with a Solr output connection that is not using the extract handler?
>>
>
Hi, do you mean content limiter length of 100?
I assume you are using the internal Tika transformer? Are you combining
this with a Solr output connection that is not using the extract handler?
By "manifold crashes" I assume you actually mean it runs out of memory.
The "long running query"
This parameter is in bytes.
Karl
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 9:03 AM ritika jain
wrote:
> Hi Users,
>
> Can anybody tell me if this can be filled as bytes or kilobytes here.
>
> The "Content Length tab looks like this:
>
>
> [image: Windows Share Job, Content Length tab]
>
> Values are to be
Hi,
Usually the reason a job doesn't complete is because a document is retrying
indefinitely. You can see what's going on by looking at the Simple History
job report, or, if you prefer, tailing the manifoldcf log.
Other times a job won't complete because somebody shut down the agents
process.
gt;
>
>
>
> --
>
> Michael Cizmar
>
>
>
> *From:* ritika jain
> *Sent:* Thursday, December 31, 2020 7:33 AM
> *To:* user@manifoldcf.apache.org
> *Subject:* Re: Indexation Not OK
>
>
>
> Elastic search output connector with some custom changes for s
in both the logs and in the simple history. Can you provide any
error messages from the log that seem to be coming from the output
connection?
Thanks,
Karl
On Thu, Dec 31, 2020 at 8:30 AM Karl Wright wrote:
> Hi,
> Can you let us know what you are using for the output connector?
&g
Hi,
Can you let us know what you are using for the output connector?
Thanks,
Karl
On Thu, Dec 31, 2020 at 8:24 AM ritika jain
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using Manifoldcf 2.14 and JCIFS connector, to ingest some billions of
> records into elastic search
> I am facing an issue in which when Job is
that I used UTF-8 encoding to provide the
> password to the obfuscate method and that testing the deobfuscate method
> provides the right password with UTF-8 chars
>
>
>
> Julien
>
>
>
> *De :* Karl Wright
> *Envoyé :* mercredi 16 décembre 2020 19:40
> *À
Hi Julien,
The properties file is read as utf-8, so as long as you make sure that the
encoding in your editor is utf-8, it should work.
Many editors default to the Microsoft code page so use something like scite
or emacs.
Karl
On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 12:31 PM wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I tried
. A rule of thumb is to
leave 10gb free for system usage and divide the remainder among your Java
processes.
Thanks,
Karl
On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 11:21 AM Bisonti Mario
wrote:
> Yes, buti t seems that, when the indexing finished, the memory is not
> released
>
>
>
>
>
Hi Mario,
Java processes only use the memory you hand them.
It looks like you are handing Java more memory than your machine has.
This will not work.
Karl
On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 10:45 AM Bisonti Mario
wrote:
>
>
> Hallo.
>
>
>
> When I scan the content of Repository , I note that memory
Svnpubsub seems to be broken.
I sent email to infrastruct...@apache.org but apparently nobody reads that
anymore. Stay tuned.
Karl
rentTime + 30L,
-currentTime + 3 * 60 * 6L,-1,true);
+currentTime + 3 * 60 * 6L,-1,false);
}
else if (se.getMessage().indexOf("cannot find") != -1 ||
se.getMessage().indexOf("cannot be found") != -1)
{
I'll commit to trunk as well.
Kar
lure processing document: The
> process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process.
>
>
>
>
>
> *Da:* Karl Wright
> *Inviato:* lunedì 24 agosto 2020 12:27
> *A:* user@manifoldcf.apache.org
> *Oggetto:* Re: Job interrupted
>
>
>
> Well, we
:55 AM Bisonti Mario
wrote:
> Yes, but after I obtain:
>
>
>
> Error: Repeated service interruptions - failure processing document: The
> process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process.
>
>
>
> And the job stops
>
>
>
>
>
Hi,
That's a warning. The job will keep running and the document will be
retried later.
Karl
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 5:24 AM Bisonti Mario
wrote:
> Hallo.
>
> I have some problems about job interrupted.
>
> The job execute a windows share scan
>
>
>
> After many errors, sometimes it stops
>
it USING THE SCRIPTS PROVIDED.
Your problems should resolve. If not, you should have logging in
manifoldcf.log telling you what is going wrong.
Karl
On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 6:40 AM Karl Wright wrote:
> You do not see log output. Therefore I need to ask you some questions.
>
You do not see log output. Therefore I need to ask you some questions.
What deployment model are you using? single process or multi-process?
what is the synchronization method?
On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 6:38 AM Karl Wright wrote:
> Usually when you shut down the agents process (or the wh
Mario
wrote:
> No, I haven’t a notification connector, buti it isn’t the problem.
>
> Manifoldcf.log is empty
>
>
>
> The problemi s that job is on hanging state and I would like to reset its
> state
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *Da:* Karl Wright
> *I
There should be output in your manifoldcf.log file, no? This may be the
result of you not having a notification connector's code actually
registered so you get no class found errors. The only solution is to put
the missing jar in place and restart your agents process. Have a look at
the log to
defined in its interface class IJobManager, but not defined in its
> implementation class JobManager, so it is always returning an empty value.
>
> Thanks
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 6:44 PM Karl Wright wrote:
>
>> Hi Ritika,
>>
>> ' My requirement is to abort a job w
Hi Ritika,
' My requirement is to abort a job whenever a seed-corresponding site is
down or returning some 5xx response codes. '
(1) Connector methods, like addSeedDocuments(), are called by the
framework. You do not call them yourself when you write a connector. So
you are looking in the
>
> If it would help, I could share the Sharepoint.dll from 2019 sharepoint.
>
> Thanks!
> Shelly
>
>
>
> On 2020/06/10 05:48:01, Karl Wright wrote:
> > Hi,
> > One is not available yet. In order to build one I need a copy of the
> > Share
Forgot the svn path:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/manifoldcf/integration/sharepoint-2019/trunk
Karl
On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 2:07 AM Karl Wright wrote:
> I've set up an svn path for this plugin. If you can "svn co" this path it
> should give you the plugin source (no dif
d, chances are good it will just work. If you would like me
to build a distribution release, I will need the DLL in order to be able to
do that.
Karl
On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 1:48 AM Karl Wright wrote:
> Hi,
> One is not available yet. In order to build one I need a copy of the
>
Hi,
One is not available yet. In order to build one I need a copy of the
Sharepoint.dll from a Sharepoint 2019 instance and some time.
Karl
On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 1:30 AM Shelly Singh
wrote:
> I am looking for Sharepoint 2019 plugin. Is one available?
>
This is a Postgresql problem of some kind. It could be the network
connection between your ManifoldCF process(es) and the Postgresql server.
If it's repeating I'd worry about it, otherwise it will recover.
Karl
On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 3:58 AM ritika jain wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am using
iate the regex
> rules by removing a letter in one of them:
> “other-site\/cas\/logi = redirect” vs “other-site\/cas\/login = form”. But
> this does not feel like a “clean” solution
>
>
>
> Regards,
> Julien
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *De :* Karl Wright
>
k
>
> On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 4:11 PM Karl Wright wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> ManifoldCF is not a crawler, it's a synchronizer. If robots says not to
>> crawl something, then it will not be indexed. If robots is changed to
>> prohibit crawling of certain documents
Hi Julien,
The login sequence must include all parts of the login sequence, from
initiation (the first 302 that you get when you load /site) all the way
through to the last action that sets the cookie. After the login sequence
is completed, the /site URL will be fetched again. If you need more
or the person or entity to
> whom it is directed. Unauthorized use, disclosure, distribution or copying
> is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please notify us immediately and permanently delete this e-mail
> and any attachments.
>
&g
nnector faces some
> problem while connecting? (a network issue)
>
> Thanks
> Ritika
>
> On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 2:39 PM Karl Wright wrote:
>
>> I commented in the ticket you created.
>> Thanks,
>> Karl
>>
>> On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 3:07 AM ritik
I commented in the ticket you created.
Thanks,
Karl
On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 3:07 AM ritika jain
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am configured Units job (Manifoldcf 2.14 and ES 7.6.2 and postgres
> 9.6.10) on server to access files from samba SMBv3 server and used
> jcifs-ng-2.1.2.jar to be loaded in lib
Hi,
ManifoldCF is not a crawler, it's a synchronizer. If robots says not to
crawl something, then it will not be indexed. If robots is changed to
prohibit crawling of certain documents, then yes, those documents will be
removed from the index.
But you can override the robots behavior in the
Hi Ritika,
ManifoldCF's ElasticSearch connector does not include any code that
requires Java 11, so you are all set.
Because JDK 11 removes many packages, however, you should expect to run
ManifoldCF 2.14 with Java 8. ManifoldCF 2.16, just released, supports Java
11.
Karl
On Thu, May 7, 2020
This is not functionality that ManifoldCF supports out of the box. The
extracted links are used for crawling, not as metadata.
I don't see a general use-case for this either, so I think you're on your
own modifying the web connector code to do what you want. The
RepositoryDocument structure has
here is some patch to the code that did not make it
> into the git.
> I can tell that I can test with Content Server 10 as well as 16.
> SOAP UI has no problem and in the end it does exactly the same (starting
> from the https WSDL etc.)
>
> Am 22.01.2020 um 13:17 schrieb Karl Wright
I believe we had increased the parameter indicated
>> in the link below
>>
>>
>> https://weblogs.asp.net/jeffwids/how-to-increase-the-timeout-for-a-sharepoint-2010-website
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 6:27 PM Karl Wright wrote:
>>
>>&g
y configuration that tries to force file based access
> of those? In the Code i did not find anything suspicious.
>
> Am 22.01.2020 um 10:28 schrieb Karl Wright :
>
>
> Has there been any news?
> I'd love to get this tied up so that you're able to proceed.
> Karl
>
>
now
> is that the xsd to which the WSDL is referring are not fetched. The bizarre
> thing is that the https url that it mention for the xsd is absolutely
> correct. So I assume it does not understand an http url, maybe that is
> related to configuration.
>
> Am 16.01.2020 um 14:53
age it tries to access the
> xsd through a https url (which is perfectly accessible for the server).
> Could it be that the connector restrict itself somehow to local file
> system only or similar?
> Have you faced this issue before?
>
>
>
> Am 16.01.2020 um 12:56 schrieb Karl
I should say that we have (AFAICT) at least two independent installations
of the csws connector working in the field, at least one of them using
secure connections.
Karl
On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 6:54 AM Karl Wright wrote:
> We solved the WSDL fetching through HTTPS, or thought we
responding issue. Apparently, the fetching of
> the WSDL itself through https was not possible. Do you remember still some
> insights beyond what is written in the issue ?
>
> Am 16.01.2020 um 00:37 schrieb Karl Wright :
>
>
> Let me think about that option.
>
> Karl
>
&g
ols for security reasons. Of course, the choice is then
> with the people using the software.
> Could that be something sensible from your point of view?
>
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 11:14 PM Karl Wright wrote:
>
>> It's rather immaterial what browsers do here. What's important
if you have an idea how this should be made configurable then I
> can look into this.
>
> Best regards
>
> Am 15.01.2020 um 10:52 schrieb Karl Wright :
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Mcf currently requires jdk8. Jdk11 is non trivial to support because of
> the removal of many jdk
vestigate what that implies.
> Does ManifoldCf supports JDK11?
>
> Am 15.01.2020 um 00:08 schrieb Karl Wright :
>
>
> I think you can just change the code to read as follows when it creates
> the SSLContext:
>
> SSLContext ctx = SSLContext.getInstance("TLSv1");
>
1 - 100 of 1521 matches
Mail list logo
