Guys .. anyone knows of any stress test fugures regarding kannel's wap
gateway and/or any lmitations on maximum number of concurrent
connections ... etc
Thanks much,
--
abulyomon
KiLLTHeUPLiNK
testing (http_smsc)
group = sendsms-user
username = kannel
password = rL4y
user-allow-ip = "*.*.*.*"
group = sms-service
keyword = default
get-url = "http://mysite.com/url.php";
max-messages = 0
omit-empty = true
catch-all = true
keyword=default
Br
Daf
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/kannel-performance-tp29914621p29914621.html
Sent from the Kannel - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi
Im testing Kannel performance using fakesmsc.
I have set-up three fake connections and im sending 20 000 SMS per
connection
and kannel receives them in speed 2000 SMS/sec per connection and stores the
messages in Kannel buffer.
Now i have Apache2 server with PHP scripts that do the SMS
Hi Yaman,
I'm using fakesmsc to stress test Kannel + server and evaluate their
performance. Of course the results depend a lot on the server configuration,
number of processors, etc. If you run fakesmsc in a different machine or if
you access a database to get the answers sent ba
I'm actually more interested in the performance of Kannel as a WAP
gateway. I'm really concerned as my CPU is occupied by 99% with wapbox
... given that I'm running 3 GHz Xeon and only have a couple of test
users!
A simple 'strace' shows contineous 'poll'ing.
I
Hi Yaman,
Yaman Saqqa wrote:
I'm actually more interested in the performance of Kannel as a WAP
gateway. I'm really concerned as my CPU is occupied by 99% with wapbox
... given that I'm running 3 GHz Xeon and only have a couple of test
users!
actually we have Kannel using as WAP g
seems that nokia phones talk
differently...
p.s.
sonyericson mobiles work just fine.
Stipe Tolj wrote:
Hi Yaman,
Yaman Saqqa wrote:
I'm actually more interested in the performance of Kannel as a WAP
gateway. I'm really concerned as my CPU is occupied by 99% with wapbox
... given that I&
onyericson mobiles work just fine.
Stipe Tolj wrote:
Hi Yaman,
Yaman Saqqa wrote:
I'm actually more interested in the performance of Kannel as a WAP
gateway. I'm really concerned as my CPU is occupied by 99% with wapbox
... given that I'm running 3 GHz Xeon and only have a couple of
Miguel Coelho dos Santos wrote:
People are using kannel as a wap gateway!?
Does it work it nokia 6310i for instances? Don't think so.
For me it never worked with nokia phones over GPRSand nobody ever
confirmed if it did work or notI think it doesn't
Can you confirm this?
definetly _can
ork or notI think it doesn't
Can you confirm this?
I did traces with ethereal and it seems that nokia phones talk
differently...
p.s.
sonyericson mobiles work just fine.
Stipe Tolj wrote:
Hi Yaman,
Yaman Saqqa wrote:
I'm actually more interested in the performance of Kannel as a WAP
firmed if it did work or notI think it doesn't
Can you confirm this?
I did traces with ethereal and it seems that nokia phones talk
differently...
p.s.
sonyericson mobiles work just fine.
Stipe Tolj wrote:
Hi Yaman,
Yaman Saqqa wrote:
I'm actually more interested in the performance of Kan
Hi all,
Some of you asked for the performance tests, so here they are. I tested
only SMS section of Kannel (not WAP), using "fakesmsc" on two platforms:
PLATFORM 1: Sun Netra t1, 1 CPU, 400MHz, 512MB RAM, 2 SCSI discs 9GB,
Solaris 8.
PLATFORM 2: Intel, dual Pentium III, 800MHz,
Rodrigo A. Cremaschi wrote:
Hi all,
Some of you asked for the performance tests, so here they are. I tested
only SMS section of Kannel (not WAP), using "fakesmsc" on two platforms:
PLATFORM 1: Sun Netra t1, 1 CPU, 400MHz, 512MB RAM, 2 SCSI discs 9GB,
Solaris 8.
PLATFORM 2: Intel, du
rd = foobar
> user-allow-ip = "*.*.*.*"
> concatenation = true
> forced-smsc = B
>
> group = sendsms-user
> username = playsms
> password = pwd
> user-allow-ip = "*.*.*.*"
>
> # this sender is for Kannel relay testing (http_smsc)
> group = sendsms-user
> username = kannel
> password = rL4y
> user-allow-ip = "*.*.*.*"
>
> group = sms-service
> keyword = default
> get-url = "http://mysite.com/url.php";
> max-messages = 0
> omit-empty = true
> catch-all = true
> keyword=default
>
>
>
> Br
> Daf
>
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/kannel-performance-tp29914621p29914696.html
Sent from the Kannel - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
box.log"
> log-level=3
> http-queue-delay=60
>
> # SEND-SMS USERS
> group = sendsms-user
> username = tester
> password = foobar
> user-allow-ip = "*.*.*.*"
> concatenation = true
> forced-smsc = B
>
> group = sendsms-user
> username = playsms
arto"
To: "dafodil"
Cc:
Sent: Friday, October 08, 2010 5:55 PM
Subject: Re: kannel performance
It would be helpful if you provide us your detailed log. Please set
log-level to 0.
sangprabv
sangpr...@gmail.com
http://www.petitiononline.com/froyo/
On Oct 8, 2010, at 6:54
itions. Were all of your smsc active during tests?
>
> BR,
> Nikos
> - Original Message -
> From: "Willy Mularto"
> To: "dafodil"
> Cc:
> Sent: Friday, October 08, 2010 5:55 PM
> Subject: Re: kannel performance
>
>
>
to spool.
> Describe test conditions. Were all of your smsc active during tests?
>
> BR,
> Nikos
> - Original Message -
> From: "Willy Mularto"
> To: "dafodil"
> Cc:
> Sent: Friday, October 08, 2010 5:55 PM
> Subject: Re: kannel performance
essages?
> Try changing store-type to spool.
> Describe test conditions. Were all of your smsc active during tests?
>
> BR,
> Nikos
> - Original Message -
> From: "Willy Mularto"
> To: "dafodil"
> Cc:
> Sent: Friday, October 08, 2010 5:5
evant portions if you get any
problems.
BR,
Nikos
- Original Message -
From: "dafodil"
To:
Sent: Friday, October 08, 2010 8:44 PM
Subject: Re: kannel performance
Hi nikkos,
just to add more operator says that kannel is senindg submit_sm for same
number multiple times.
K indefinitely,
> it
> shouldn't resend the same sms again.
>
> I am assuming you are using the SMPP smsc. Try on sending a few SMS (~5),
> comment out log-file in smsc group and turn bb logs to maximum detail.
> Watch
> for anything unusual, especially ACKs. Post relevant
This is not bb access log, but smsbox access log. It doesn't prove anyting,
except that you have sent twice the same SMS.
BR,
Nikos
- Original Message -
From: "dafodil"
To:
Sent: Saturday, October 09, 2010 10:17 AM
Subject: Re: kannel performance
Hi Nikkos,
Than
og. It doesn't prove
> anyting,
> except that you have sent twice the same SMS.
>
> BR,
> Nikos
> - Original Message -
> From: "dafodil"
> To:
> Sent: Saturday, October 09, 2010 10:17 AM
> Subject: Re: kannel performance
>
>
>>
Nothing wrong with kannel. Your application sends them twice. If in doubt
check max detail smsbox logs.
BR,
Nikos
- Original Message -
From: "dafodil"
To:
Sent: Sunday, October 10, 2010 3:52 PM
Subject: Re: kannel performance
Hi
yes u r right is sb log.
i wonder when i
il smsbox logs.
>
> BR,
> Nikos
> - Original Message -
> From: "dafodil"
> To:
> Sent: Sunday, October 10, 2010 3:52 PM
> Subject: Re: kannel performance
>
>
>>
>> Hi
>> yes u r right is sb log.
>> i wonder when i sent
Subject: Re: kannel performance
Hi
Nikkos,
no my application is as simple php script which sends only once.it sends
to
10 numbers.for some numbers request is added twice and rest with one.
Br
Daf
Nikos Balkanas wrote:
Nothing wrong with kannel. Your application sends them twice. I
this thread terminates.
>
> BR,
> Nikos - (not Nikkos)
> - Original Message -
> From: "dafodil"
> To:
> Sent: Monday, October 11, 2010 8:38 AM
> Subject: Re: kannel performance
>
>
>>
>> Hi
>> Nikkos,
>>
>> no my appl
Hi,
I am interested to know about the kannel performance benchmarking,
especially in terms of speed (msgs/sec), MO or MT. I assume that multiple
smsboxes does not have any effect over kannel performance, since the
front-end talking to SMSC is the main bearerbox. What is the max speed that
could
Hi!
First try to test only apache performance without kannel.
At least you'll be sure if it's apache+php problem or something else.
Some ideas (mostly about apache and php tuning):
1. Use eaccelerator to increase performance of PHP scripts.
2. Try to use some lightweight HTTP daemon (l
not!
Hope it helps
Regards
-Original Message-
From: Illimar Reinbusch - Telejazz.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: mercredi 13 février 2008 04:55
To: users@kannel.org
Subject: Kannel performance
Hi
Im testing Kannel performance using fakesmsc.
I have set-up three fake connections and
Illimar Reinbusch - Telejazz.com schrieb:
Hi
Im testing Kannel performance using fakesmsc.
I have set-up three fake connections and im sending 20 000 SMS per
connection
and kannel receives them in speed 2000 SMS/sec per connection and stores
the
messages in Kannel buffer.
Now i have Apache2
Michael Bochkaryov schrieb:
Hi!
First try to test only apache performance without kannel.
At least you'll be sure if it's apache+php problem or something else.
Some ideas (mostly about apache and php tuning):
1. Use eaccelerator to increase performance of PHP scripts.
2. Try t
Can you share your conf files for kannel and apache so we can help you test?
/Garth
On Feb 13, 2008 3:32 PM, Stipe Tolj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael Bochkaryov schrieb:
> > Hi!
> >
> > First try to test only apache performance without kannel.
> > At least
Hi
After adding eaccelerator to my server, i got speed boost about 2-3
times, now its about 1500 SMS/minute.
Checking /server-status under heavy load i see that apache has about
10-15 requests in process and
13-16 free idle workers all the time.
Kannel keep-alive has been switched off by me
Hi
After adding eaccelerator to my server, i got speed boost about 2-3
times, now its about 1500 SMS/minute.
Checking /server-status under heavy load i see that apache has about
10-15 requests in process and
13-16 free idle workers all the time.
Kannel keep-alive has been switched off by me
Has anyone attempted to use with litespeedtech.com instead of apache
to boost incoming http posts?
We're also noticing very slow http posts to our apache from our API
users and seeking ways to get performance increase.
Would it help maybe to have a proxy or use some other tools anyone
tha
How can I check Kannel performance using fakesms script?
Thanks,
- Ambrish
Hi All,
This is my kannel sms gateway architecture:
*BBox--SQLBox---SMSBox---Multiple Fake SMSC's*
And this is my kannel status:
-
Status: running, uptime 1d 0h 26m 44s
WDP: received 0 (0 queued), sent 0 (0 queued)
e for SMSc
throughput. I remember when benchmarking with fake smpp I could get ~450
MT/s on a low end Solaris using Mysql. Without Mysql I could reach ~700
MT/s.
BR,
Nikos
- Original Message -
From: Sharwan K
To: de...@kannel.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2011 4:23 PM
Subject: Help : P
Hello list,
the company I work for is using Kannel 1.4.3 on CentOS 6 as SMS gateway between
our application servers and an SMSC. We have developed a multithreaded
application that sends HTTP GET requests to our internal Kannel proxy.
Everything goes smooth up to 5 application threads. The probl
08, 2010 4:22 PM
Subject: Kannel performance benchmarking
Hi,
I am interested to know about the kannel performance benchmarking,
especially in terms of speed (msgs/sec), MO or MT. I assume that multiple
smsboxes does not have any effect over kannel performance, since the
front-end talking to S
's: 1400 SMS/s
> MT + DLRs (internal): 747 SMS/s
> MT + DLRs (MySql): 434 SMS/s
>
> BR,
> Nikos
> - Original Message - From: ha...@aeon.pk
> To: kannel users
> Sent: Sunday, August 08, 2010 4:22 PM
> Subject: Kannel performance benchmarking
>
>
&g
...@aeon.pk
> To: kannel users
> Sent: Sunday, August 08, 2010 4:22 PM
> Subject: Kannel performance benchmarking
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
> I am interested to know about the kannel performance benchmarking, especially
> in terms of speed (msgs/sec), MO or MT. I assume that
- Original Message -
From: brett skinner
To: Nikos Balkanas
Cc: ha...@aeon.pk ; kannel users
Sent: Monday, August 09, 2010 5:42 PM
Subject: Re: Kannel performance benchmarking
Hi Nikos
Out of curiosity can you go into more detail regarding what hardware you
were running and your setup
Sent: Monday, August 09, 2010 5:59 PM
Subject: Re: Kannel performance benchmarking
Hi Nikos,
Do you experience memory problem? In my case Kannel is eating the memory on
high load traffics. I always need to restart the box to get more memory. I
even give 3 on /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches but still
Try valgrind in linux.
BR,
Nikos
- Original Message -
From: "sangprabv"
To: "Nikos Balkanas"
Cc: "brett skinner" ; "kannel users"
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 3:35 AM
Subject: Re: Kannel performance benchmarking
Yeah I understand that.
nominal levels once the traffic is gone.
>
> BR,
> Nikos
> - Original Message - From: sangprabv
> To: brett skinner
> Cc: Nikos Balkanas ; kannel users
> Sent: Monday, August 09, 2010 5:59 PM
> Subject: Re: Kannel performance benchmarking
>
>
> Hi Nikos,
uot;Nikos Balkanas"
> Cc: "brett skinner" ; "kannel users" <
> users@kannel.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 3:35 AM
>
> Subject: Re: Kannel performance benchmarking
>
>
> Yeah I understand that. But when the there is no traffic. Kannel do
oficin@
-Original Message-
From: brett skinner
Sender: users-boun...@kannel.org
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 10:13:54
To: Users
Subject: Re: Kannel performance benchmarking
Hi Nikos
Thanks for the extra information. What was the motivation for using MyISAM?
My reading lead me to believe that
:21 AM
Subject: Re: Kannel performance benchmarking
Brett,
The DLR engine uses SELECT COUNT(*) from the admin interface, which is
painfully slow on InnoDB for moderately big tables.
While InnoDB would theoretically be the best option, MyIsam performs quite
better in this case.
Regards,
Alex
the
stock standard configuration. I read through the following blog and followed
their advice which increased its performance quite drastically.
http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/11/01/innodb-performance-optimization-basics/
<http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/11/01/inn
ail.com
> To: brett skinner ; users-boun...@kannel.org ; us...@kannel. Users@Kannel.Org
> Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 11:21 AM
>
> Subject: Re: Kannel performance benchmarking
>
>
> Brett,
>
> The DLR engine uses SELECT COUNT(*) from the admin interface, whic
eat Innodb out the box but Innodb
> does seem to be better in terms of the issues you have pointed out. The
> other thing that I have read is that Innodb is incredibly slow with the
> stock standard configuration. I read through the following blog and followed
or the application
>> that surround Kannel. MyISAM definitely beat Innodb out the box but Innodb
>> does seem to be better in terms of the issues you have pointed out. The
>> other thing that I have read is that Innodb is incredibly slow with the
>> stock standard configuration
: Alejandro Guerrieri
Cc: Users
Subject: Re: Kannel performance benchmarking
Thanks for your feedback.
Guess it is the age old tao of computer science. Space vs Time, always space vs
time. :)
Regards,
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:52 AM, Alejandro Guerrieri
wrote:
Oh yes, I read that blog
Regarding this performance benchmarking. I still got memory problem. Kannel
fails to release buffered or cached memory. Does anybody has tips to avoid this
problem? Thanks.
sangprabv
sangpr...@gmail.com
http://www.petitiononline.com/froyo/
On Aug 10, 2010, at 10:12 PM, Rene Kluwen wrote
be concerned by the amount of memory
being used.
Regards,
Alex
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 5:26 PM, sangprabv wrote:
> Regarding this performance benchmarking. I still got memory problem. Kannel
> fails to release buffered or cached memory. Does anybody has tips to avoid
> this problem? Thank
e, Aug 10, 2010 at 5:26 PM, sangprabv wrote:
> Regarding this performance benchmarking. I still got memory problem. Kannel
> fails to release buffered or cached memory. Does anybody has tips to avoid
> this problem? Thanks.
>
>
>
> sangprabv
> sangpr...@gmail.com
> htt
performance benchmarking
Currently I apply bearerbox-sqlbox-smsbox and use mysql as my dlr engine. On
Delll R710 Quadcore 2.2 Intel Xeon 16GB RAM it usually reduce to 5GB available
memory in just 6 days and must be restarted to gain more memory. The server
only used by Kannel. My daily
: Alejandro Guerrieri
Cc: Rene Kluwen; brett skinner; Users
Subject: Re: Kannel performance benchmarking
Currently I apply bearerbox-sqlbox-smsbox and use mysql as my dlr engine. On
Delll R710 Quadcore 2.2 Intel Xeon 16GB RAM it usually reduce to 5GB available
memory in just 6 days and must be
Hi,
I am relatively new to using Kannel and was wondering if you any body
could help me with a few things.
From what I have read in the Kannel manual I have managed to
successfully set up my config file to send and receive messages, my
problem comes in while I have been stress testing the sy
t a minute) the SQLBox suddenly stop by itself and I
must restart it manually, what's the problem here? Is it caused by miss
configuration? The other question is it's performance, is it stable to handle
thousand SMS/minute or millions SMS/day? Please guide me how to configure this
great S
Hello,
I have a question about the quality of service of the Kannel SMS
Gateway.
I will connect Kannel to a SMSC with a rate of 64 Kbit/s.
I would like to know how many sms could be received by Kannel ?
2 SMS per Sec 10, 100, 1000 ??
thanks a lot.
On Tue, 3 Aug 2004, Yaman Saqqa wrote:
> Guys .. anyone knows of any stress test fugures regarding kannel's wap
> gateway and/or any lmitations on maximum number of concurrent
> connections ... etc
We're currently sending 21,000 a day, and both bearerbox and smsbox are
running at 0.0% CPU. I'm b
Hi guys,
I would like to calculate the optimal number of smsc connections that my
server can handle for better performance.
Can anyone suggest the best way to determine this value?
Thanks a lot.
BR
Hi Kannel users,
I am developing a solution to manage massive SMS campaigns using Kannel.
Performance is really important for me. For that I built many modules to
send messages, to treat delivery status, etc.
Kannel seems to work well while receiving messages via smsbox and sending
via a SMPP
Hi
I'm after some pointers for achieving best performance when handling DLRs.
We're running Kannel 1.5.0 on Ubuntu 10.04 (32 bit) on a VMWare virtual machine
on a Windows 2003 host (64 bit).
Of the two options that appear to be open to us which is likely to perform best?
*
Hi Fabio
did you check bearerbox and smsbox for errors?
Also share your full configurations.
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 4:50 PM, Fabio Sangiovanni wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> the company I work for is using Kannel 1.4.3 on CentOS 6 as SMS gateway
> between our application servers and an SMSC. We hav
Hi Mohammed,
thanks for your reply.
Unfortunately I won't be at my workplace again until next monday, so I won't be
able to provide detailed logs since then.
On the other hand, I can post the kannel.conf file currently in use on the test
machine.
Thanks again for your help. I'll post relevant lo
Hey Fabio
I can't provide a 100% solution for this issue before seeing the log. Try
to check the log and see if there is any error. But most probably it is an
open-files limitation problem, because you haven't set a limit to
"sms-outgoing-queue-limit".
But Actually this depends on your throughput
Thanks again Mohammed, I'll change those settings as soon as I get back to work.
I'll keep you posted! :)
Cheers,
Fabio
Il giorno 09/dic/2011, alle ore 15:21, Mohammed Saleem ha scritto:
Hey Fabio
I can't provide a 100% solution for this issue before seeing the log. Try to
check the log and s
Why dont u use SQLBOX?
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 7:44 PM, Fabio Sangiovanni wrote:
> Thanks again Mohammed, I'll change those settings as soon as I get back
> to work.
> I'll keep you posted! :)
>
> Cheers,
> Fabio
>
>
> Il giorno 09/dic/2011, alle ore 15:21, Mohammed Saleem ha scritto:
>
> Hey
Hi hamza,
do you mean using a database as dlr storage, don't you? I'm kind of a newbie of
Kannel, so I've tried to keep things simple at first. But if this is going to
solve mi performance issue, I'll dig more deep into it.
Have you got some good reading on the matter to su
Hello list,
I've got some updates to show you to better explain my problem.
Situation:
CentOS/6
kannel 1.4.3, used as SMS gateway via http calls originating from a custom
application my company developed
kannel.conf: http://pastebin.com/CCX9PGMN
Problem:
Using a multithreaded application to s
his should
significantly increase the performance.
Regards
On 13/12/2011 14:57, Fabio Sangiovanni wrote:
Hello list,
I've got some updates to show you to better explain my problem.
Situation:
CentOS/6
kannel 1.4.3, used as SMS gateway via http calls originating from a custom
applica
each SMS. AFAIR Kannel supports keep-alive so you should be
> creating one HTTP connection per thread. This should significantly increase
> the performance.
>
>
> Regards
>
>
>
> On 13/12/2011 14:57, Fabio Sangiovanni wrote:
>> Hello list,
>>
>>
my question is that ,
what exactly is the performance difference between the sms centre provided
by the operator and the one which is created by my own cellphone . And which
one will be better to use under what circumstances .
I have a question about the quality of service of the Kannel SMS
Gateway.
I will connect Kannel to a SMSC with a rate of 64 Kbit/s.
I would like to know how many sms could be received by Kannel ?
2 SMS per Sec 10, 100, 1000 ??
Hi!
Hard to tell, probably around 10 or more, minimum 5-7 a second.
Wit
, the same rate continues. Any ideas?
FYI, I tried to test the CIMD2 protocol using the test_cimd2 program w/c I
found together with the kannel source. I run it w/in our network, and I am
getting a rate of about more than a 100/sec. Can't really figureout what is
wrong.
How can I speed up t
Hi guys,
I have a setup where by I am connected via smpp to mobile operator, receive
messages via sms-service get-url, process it with php and send replies via
sqlbox (inserting into send_sms)
This setup goes all fine and well during testing ( low traffic ) phase
except for a few niggles (not the
2014-04-07 23:29 GMT+04:00 Douglas Calzzetta Filho :
> Hi Kannel users,
>
> I am developing a solution to manage massive SMS campaigns using Kannel.
> Performance is really important for me. For that I built many modules to
> send messages, to treat delivery status, etc.
> Ka
m> wrote:
> Hi
>
>
>
> I’m after some pointers for achieving best performance when handling DLRs.
>
>
>
> We’re running Kannel 1.5.0 on Ubuntu 10.04 (32 bit) on a VMWare virtual
> machine on a Windows 2003 host (64 bit).
>
>
>
> Of the two options th
Not quite. Benchmarks with fakesmpp using a native middle-end Solaris 10
(64bit) have shown ~750 MT/s when using internal DLRs and ~450 MT/s when
using mysql. You can serach the email archives for the detailed benchmarks.
Using a visrtual machine is always a bad choice if you seek performance
Richard Crawshaw
Cc: us...@vm1.kannel.org
Subject: Re: Pointers for best DLR performance
Not quite. Benchmarks with fakesmpp using a native middle-end Solaris 10
(64bit) have shown ~750 MT/s when using internal DLRs and ~450 MT/s when using
mysql. You can serach the email archives for the detailed
for that.
BR,
Nikos
- Original Message -
From: "Richard Crawshaw"
To: "Nikos Balkanas" ; "Mohammed Saleem"
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2011 5:36 PM
Subject: RE: Pointers for best DLR performance
Nikos, Mohammed
Many thanks for the information,
, 2009 7:38 PM
Subject: performance difference between sms centres
my question is that ,
what exactly is the performance difference between the sms centre provided by
the operator and the one which is created by my own cellphone . And which one
will be better to use under what circumstances .
properly implemented, may "kill"
your system performance.
Br, Rinor
On 06/15/2013 08:36 AM, Eric Beda wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I have a setup where by I am connected via smpp to mobile operator,
> receive messages via sms-service get-url, process it with php and send
> repl
en processing
continues ( I will be changing this to XML or text file to reduce mysql
queries)
As it stands Linux (ubuntu), Apache, PHP and Kannel are all set on default
values and that is were my worry lies probably i'm supposed to tweak
something to get optimum performance. my Kannel co
*Hello Everyone,*
I'm new with Kannel SMS Gateway. I have configured Kannel as my
requirements.
This is my Gateway Architecture:
*HTTP Application <> BBox** <> SQLBox** <> SMSBox** <>
SMSCs*
* <> Mobile*
Now, the problem is that When I'm observing send_sms table that are crea
Can you please stop SPAMMING kannel lists?
Really annoying to get 100500 questions on the same issue from you all time.
You could read a bit of mailing lists, this question has been covered many
times already and there were many suggestions why you might be having low
performance.
2014-11-05 10
mailing lists, this question has been covered many
> times already and there were many suggestions why you might be having low
> performance.
>
> 2014-11-05 10:05 GMT+03:00 Aditya Khanna :
>
>>
>> *Hello Everyone,*
>> I'm new with Kannel SMS Gateway. I have
PAMMING kannel lists?
>>
>> Really annoying to get 100500 questions on the same issue from you all
>> time.
>>
>> You could read a bit of mailing lists, this question has been covered
>> many times already and there were many suggestions why you might be having
rom you all
>>> time.
>>>
>>> You could read a bit of mailing lists, this question has been covered
>>> many times already and there were many suggestions why you might be having
>>> low performance.
>>>
>>> 2014-11-05 10:05 GMT
ts?
>>>>
>>>> Really annoying to get 100500 questions on the same issue from you all
>>>> time.
>>>>
>>>> You could read a bit of mailing lists, this question has been covered
>>>> many times already and there were many suggestio
100500 questions? LOL. Maybe he needs your guidance
>>>> mate.
>>>> On 5 Nov 2014 18:16, "spameden" wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Can you please stop SPAMMING kannel lists?
>>>>>
>>>>> Really annoying to get 100500 quest
Hello Everyone,
When I'm sending message in bulk then I'm not getting a satisfactory
performance using kannel.
My current status is: outbound (5.42,4.22,2.81) msg/sec
I'm also connecting multiple SMSC's connections.
So please suggest me that how to increase this.
ourly-based).
>>>>
>>>> 2014-11-05 15:01 GMT+03:00 Willy Mularto :
>>>>
>>>>> Is that really 100500 questions? LOL. Maybe he needs your guidance
>>>>> mate.
>>>>> On 5 Nov 2014 18:16, "spameden" wrote:
>>>
users@kannel.org
Subject: Re: How to Improve Performance of SQLBox
Dear Friends & Kannel Team,
Got a serious Issue.
Server A: Centos 6.5 Server with Kannel svn-r5122., 4 GB RAM, 1TB HDD
Server B: Centos 6.5 with LAMP Stack , MYSQL 5.5.1, 3.2 Ghz Xeon, 8 GB, 1TD HDD
Server C: "Virtual Machine
e and switch port.
>
> 4. Update HDD board driver according to manufacturer
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Leandro
>
>
>
> *From:* users [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] *On Behalf Of *RK Krishnas
> *Sent:* Thursday, January 01, 2015 9:32 AM
> *To:* spameden
>
Change LAN board, cable and switch port.
From: RK Krishnas
Date: January 3, 2015 12:42:14 PM
Subject:Re: How to Improve Performance of SQLBox
To: "Tenorio, Leandro"
CC: spameden , Aditya Khanna
, "kannel users@kannel.org&qu
1 - 100 of 109 matches
Mail list logo
