Re: Whitelist Question

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here is the header info. What is the alternate solution to using whitelist_from ? I been also trying to setup AWL via MySQL.no luck on that. I use Exim for mail then , it relays to Lotus Domino.if that helps. Content analysis details: (5.7 points, 10.0 re

Re: Whitelist Question

On Tue, 11 Mar 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here is the header info. *screenshots*? During the day I use a text-only mail client, so I can't look at them for you until tonight unless you post the text version of the full message headers. I can't say whether anyone else will bother to look.

Re: Whitelist Question

ibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this E-Mail message in error, notify the sender by reply E-Mail and delete the message. John Hardin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 03/11/2008 12:47 PM To [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject Re: Whitelist Question On Tue, 11

Re: Whitelist Question

On Tue, 11 Mar 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I add users to whitelist in the local.cf file "whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED]" but they still get tagged as Spam, is there a altnerative solution. (1) Don't use whitelist_from, it is too easy for spammers to spoof. Use one of the other whitelist

Re: Whitelist Question

Sure - a procmail recipe would work. Or, provide an example header and an example entry from your local.cf so maybe someone here can see if there's something incorrect. At 09:39 AM 3/11/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I add users to whitelist in the local.cf file "whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: whitelist failure?

On Tue, 12 Feb 2008, The Doctor wrote: Hmm!! Slight problem! I indicated a whtielist_from in the universal configuration file and still there is {spam?} label. What should I be fixing? Your request for help. Please post the whitelist command you added to the configuration file, the name of

Re: whitelist

- Original Message - From: "Daryl C. W. O'Shea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Jack Gostl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "spam" Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2007 11:08 PM Subject: Re: whitelis

Re: whitelist

Matt Kettler wrote: Matt Kettler wrote: Jack Gostl wrote: I have an odd problem. I have a user receiving spam from something like [EMAIL PROTECTED] Since he does business with verybigcompany.com, he had them in his white list, and as expected, the spam slipped through. Based on the advice I

Re: whitelist

Jack Gostl wrote: > > - Original Message - From: "Matt Kettler" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Jack Gostl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: "spam" > Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2007 8:19 PM > Subject: Re: whitelist > > >>

Re: whitelist

- Original Message - From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Jack Gostl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "spam" Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2007 8:19 PM Subject: Re: whitelist Matt Kettler wrote: Jack Gostl wrote: I have an odd problem. I

Re: whitelist

Matt Kettler wrote: > Jack Gostl wrote: > >> I have an odd problem. I have a user receiving spam from something like >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Since he does business with verybigcompany.com, >> he had them in his white list, and as expected, the spam slipped through. >> >> Based on the advice I got i

Re: whitelist

Jack Gostl wrote: > I have an odd problem. I have a user receiving spam from something like > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Since he does business with verybigcompany.com, > he had them in his white list, and as expected, the spam slipped through. > > Based on the advice I got in this newsgroup, I changed him

Re: Whitelist gives positive score???

Igor Chudov wrote: > On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 11:51:09AM -0500, Theo Van Dinter wrote: > >> On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 10:46:39AM -0600, Igor Chudov wrote: >> >>> I whitelisted some friends, but, to my shock, whitelist ADDS to a >>> score, I thought it should subtract it? It adds 5 to my scores

Re: Whitelist gives positive score???

On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 10:58:00AM -0600, Igor Chudov wrote: > > If the former, that is strange, and I'd assume your config overrides the > > scores positively for some reason. > > Do you know what is the score name for whitelist_from? USER_IN_WHITELIST -- Randomly Selected Tagline: In the eyes

Re: Whitelist gives positive score???

On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 11:51:09AM -0500, Theo Van Dinter wrote: > On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 10:46:39AM -0600, Igor Chudov wrote: > > I whitelisted some friends, but, to my shock, whitelist ADDS to a > > score, I thought it should subtract it? It adds 5 to my scores. What's > > wrong? > > When you s

Re: Whitelist gives positive score???

On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 10:46:39AM -0600, Igor Chudov wrote: > I whitelisted some friends, but, to my shock, whitelist ADDS to a > score, I thought it should subtract it? It adds 5 to my scores. What's > wrong? When you say you whitelisted folks, do you mean "whitelist_*" config options, or someth

Re: Whitelist of my friends -- followup

Theo Van Dinter wrote: > On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 09:10:18PM -0500, Igor Chudov wrote: > >> So, if whitelist_from is scalable to a few thousand addresses, I would >> like to use it. >> > > It probably won't scale that far since it's super inefficient to have a flat > file config w/ that man

Re: Whitelist of my friends -- followup

On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 09:10:18PM -0500, Igor Chudov wrote: > So, if whitelist_from is scalable to a few thousand addresses, I would > like to use it. It probably won't scale that far since it's super inefficient to have a flat file config w/ that many entries. You'd want to have some kind of p

Re: Whitelist of my friends -- followup

Igor Chudov wrote: > I have to respectfully disagree with those who say that whitelisting > my friends is a bad idea. > I never said that whitelisting your friends is a bad idea. I said whitelisting based on email address ALONE is a bad idea in general. It's a lot better to use tools that are

Re: Whitelist from file

Crossposted to Karmasphere-users and to SpamAssassin-users Igor Chudov wrote: I have several mail folders (linux mailbox files) that are a good source of whitelist information. For example, I am sure that all To: addresses in my sent folder, and all From: addresses in my friends or ebay fold

Re: Whitelist from file

Igor Chudov wrote: > I have several mail folders (linux mailbox files) that are a good > source of whitelist information. For example, I am sure that all To: > addresses in my sent folder, and all From: addresses in my friends or > ebay folder, are good. > > So what I would like to do is to genera

Re: Whitelist from file

Igor Chudov wrote: > I have several mail folders (linux mailbox files) that are a good > source of whitelist information. For example, I am sure that all To: > addresses in my sent folder, and all From: addresses in my friends or > ebay folder, are good. > > So what I would like to do is to genera

Re: Whitelist Spam

On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 13:33 -0500, Dean Clapper wrote: > A couple of emails are getting through that are being marked as not spam > but is clearly spam. The problem is the spammers put in the from line our > domain. However, the return path is something totally different. > > Is there a good

Re: Whitelist Spam

On Wed, 4 Apr 2007, Dean Clapper wrote: > A couple of emails are getting through that are being marked as > not spam but is clearly spam. The problem is the spammers put in > the from line our domain. However, the return path is something > totally different. > > Is there a good way to handle t

Re: Whitelist scoring question

I was using my own script for SARE updates last week. The I switched to sa-update subscribing to openprotect.org. Then my GEOCITES rules seemed to start missing; so I did some diging and found somebody else unhappy with the GEOCITIES rules in 70_sare_specific.cf and was kind enough to share. I

Re: Whitelist scoring question

Hi Anthony, I was using Openprotect's SARE update channel for my standard sare rules. I am not sure exactly what the issue was, but believe it was due to a redefined "USER_IN_WHITELIST" that they have somewhere in their rule set. To correct the issue, I removed all cf files that were updated from

Re: Whitelist scoring question

Hi Mark, Can you be more specific? Was someone/thing changing your whitelist file? Mark Adams wrote: Hi All, I would like to note that this problem has been corrected, and was due to an external automatic updating source. Thanks for all the help that has been provided. Regards, Mark On Thu

Re: Whitelist scoring question

Hi All, I would like to note that this problem has been corrected, and was due to an external automatic updating source. Thanks for all the help that has been provided. Regards, Mark On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 03:50:52PM +0100, Mark Adams wrote: > I have changed my reporting template, and now get

Re: Whitelist scoring question

I have changed my reporting template, and now get this information Content analysis details: (4.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description -- -- 0.5 NO_RDNSSending MTA has no reverse

RE: whitelist and blacklist problem

Hi, I have three servers and all have same problem. i have sent you example of the different servers so that the version diffrence occurs. Thanks Fabien GARZIANO wrote: > > > Hi, > > I don't know the answer to your question. But something looks weird in > your example : > > Case 1 : "v

RE: whitelist and blacklist problem

Hi, I don't know the answer to your question. But something looks weird in your example : Case 1 : "version=3.1.8" Case 2 : "version=3.0.5" Are you using the same SA setup for both cases ? I Hope it helps. > -Message d'origine- > De : lalit [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Envoyé : j

Re: Whitelist scoring question

Thanks, I did run exactly that, and got the output that I posted. Do you have any idea why I might be getting such a limited output? What do you have set for reporting purposes in your local.cf file? Regards, Mark On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 01:31:16PM -0500, maillist wrote: > Mark Adams wrote: > >>

Re: Whitelist scoring question

> > You could run: "spamassassin --test-mode < message", and see what it is > scoring. > Hi There, I have tried this, and get the below result. --_=_NextPart_001_01C7710E.58A560A4-- hits=4.0 required=5.0 test=NO_RDNS,VOWEL_FROM_7 This does not show whitelist hits, should it? Regards, Ma

Re: Whitelist scoring question

Mark Adams wrote: Hi All, I have not got to the bottom of this. Does anyone know how to report on whether a mail is having points deducted because it is whitelisted? Regards, Mark On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 03:34:58PM +, Mark Adams wrote: Thanks for that, The lint has not complained abou

Re: Whitelist scoring question

Hi All, I have not got to the bottom of this. Does anyone know how to report on whether a mail is having points deducted because it is whitelisted? Regards, Mark On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 03:34:58PM +, Mark Adams wrote: > Thanks for that, > > The lint has not complained about any config probl

Re: Whitelist scoring question

Thanks for that, The lint has not complained about any config problems with the line you have suggested. Do you know a quick and easy way of testing whether the whitelisting is working correctly? I have a reporting template setup as below, but this never shows any whitelist hits. (I'm probably jus

Re: Whitelist scoring question

Mark Adams wrote: Hi All, Quick questions regarding whitelisting. I have read that whitelisting applies -50 points whether using whitelist_from or whitelist_from_rcvd. My question is can this amount be altered? Thanks for any help. Regards, Mark Yes edit your /etc/mail/spamassassin/local

Re: whitelist problem

On Fri, 2 Mar 2007, deepak wrote: > i've [EMAIL PROTECTED] in whitelist. Exactly what command did you use to put it there? Can you post the headers from a message that was improperly scored? -- John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]FALaholi

Re: whitelist problem

Thanks a lot for your response I'm using SA 3.1 .7 i've [EMAIL PROTECTED] in whitelist.I really couldn't notice anything strange on the server when this problem is reported. Evan Platt wrote: At 11:11 AM 3/1/2007, deepak wrote: Hello, I'm having a very strange problem with whilte listing

Re: whitelist problem

At 11:11 AM 3/1/2007, deepak wrote: Hello, I'm having a very strange problem with whilte listing in Spamassassin. I've one domain in whiltelist (along with other domains) of spamassassin. it looks that whitelist feature works some time while some times it doesnt. please suggest something. Re

Re: whitelist problem

On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 12:41:14AM +0530, deepak wrote: > Hello, > > I'm having a very strange problem with whilte listing in Spamassassin. > I've one domain in whiltelist (along with other domains) of > spamassassin. it looks that whitelist feature works some time while some > times it doesnt.

Re: Whitelist question

Joe Zitnik wrote: > How would I whitelist mail from a listserv? Since the mail is shown > to be from the user who sent it and not the listserv, I can't do a > whitelist_from. Would it be easier to make a rule to look for the > listserv domain in the header? How would I make a rule to look for >

Re: Whitelist question

Hi > How would I whitelist mail from a listserv? Since the mail is shown to > be from the user who sent it and not the listserv, I can't do a > whitelist_from. Would it be easier to make a rule to look for the > listserv domain in the header? How would I make a rule to look for just > a word in

Re: whitelist problems

urgrue wrote: > >> The auto-whitelist has nothing to do with anything that says >> WHITELISTED. >> >> The auto-whitelist will show up as a rule named AWL. Nothing else. >> >> That said, can you be VERY specific about what your headers say? >> >> Does it say USER_IN_WHITELIST? >> >> If so, check yo

Re: whitelist problems

John D. Hardin wrote: > On Sat, 10 Feb 2007, Matt Kettler wrote: > > >> In particular, make sure you didn't do anything like the common >> mistake of "whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED]". Any spammer can >> trivially forge a From: or Return-Path header, and forging your >> own domain in these fiel

Re: whitelist problems

On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 10:34:35PM +0200, urgrue wrote: > It says, precisely: > X-Spam-Status: No, hits=- tagged_above=-.0 required=5.0 WHITELISTED > > So if its not whitelist_from or the AWL, what can it be? That's not an SA header, so I'm guessing you call SA from a third party daemon. I'd

Re: whitelist problems

The auto-whitelist has nothing to do with anything that says WHITELISTED. The auto-whitelist will show up as a rule named AWL. Nothing else. That said, can you be VERY specific about what your headers say? Does it say USER_IN_WHITELIST? If so, check your whitelist_from and whitelist_from_rc

Re: whitelist problems

On Sat, 10 Feb 2007, Matt Kettler wrote: > In particular, make sure you didn't do anything like the common > mistake of "whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED]". Any spammer can > trivially forge a From: or Return-Path header, and forging your > own domain in these fields is a common tactic because spam

Re: whitelist problems

urgrue wrote: > I'm having a whitelist-related problem. > -a lot of spam comes through with WHITELISTED in the headers, yet i > can never find the senders, IPs, etc of said messages in any > whitelists, including the auto-whitelist. > -auto-whitelist is in use although I've disabled it everywhere.

Re: Whitelist file to large?

On Tue, January 23, 2007 16:58, bryan haase wrote: > My whitelist file currently has 13,500 lines and is 503K. spamd is about > 58-59M. amavisd-new sql whitelist/blacklist would love this > Is there a point when the whitelist file becomes to large? is spam scanning needed for the recipients at

Re: Whitelist and Excessive Spam Please Help

On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 11:00:17AM -0500, Kyle Quillen wrote: > Ok when I type spamassassin -D it stops at > > [2] dbg: dns: is Net::DNS::Resolver available? yes > [2] dbg: dns: Net::DNS version: 0.48 > > and then just sits there waiting for something. I read somewhere that > it wanted t

Re: Whitelist and Excessive Spam Please Help

On Wed, 2006-12-20 at 16:49 +0100, Matthias Leisi wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > > > Kyle Quillen wrote: > > > I have a few issues with our filtering and am not sure how to make > > things better. The main issue that I have is that I have created a > > whitelis

Re: Whitelist and Excessive Spam Please Help

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Kyle Quillen wrote: > I have a few issues with our filtering and am not sure how to make > things better. The main issue that I have is that I have created a > whitelist.cf file in /etc/mail/spamassassin but with the following > [..] > > I am not

RE: Whitelist and Excessive Spam Please Help

Kyle Quillen wrote: > they are still getting tagged as spam. > > ... > X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=2.8 required=2.0 Of course they're still getting tagged as spam. A score of 2.0 is way, Way, WAY too low a score to be reasonable. At my site it's set to 3.5, and it's still very aggressive, requiri

Re: whitelist the sa list from learning?

On Wednesday 18 October 2006 16:50, Matt Kettler took the opportunity to say: > RobertH wrote: > > Please pardon my missing it recently > > > > If someone wants to whitelist a subscribed email list (specifically this > > list) from being auto learned by SA what is the local.cf entry please? > > > >

Re: whitelist the sa list from learning?

RobertH wrote: > Please pardon my missing it recently > > If someone wants to whitelist a subscribed email list (specifically this > list) from being auto learned by SA what is the local.cf entry please? > > Hehehhe I notice with so much talk of spam, things get canned a lot. ;-) > To quote and

Re: Whitelist ebay

steven, Lint keeps throwing out this line: whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] Is there something special about ebay? you need a second parameter on that line. from the man page ... "whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] sourceforge.net Use this to supplement the whitelist_from addre

Re: Whitelist ebay

On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 04:48:02PM -0500, Steven Stern wrote: > Lint keeps throwing out this line: > > whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Is there something special about ebay? No, but you're missing the rest of the line. perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf -- Randomly Generated Tagline:

Re: whitelist poisoned? spam getting through

Mathias Homann wrote: Kelson Vibber schrieb: Simple answer: don't whitelist your own address. Some spammers will do this deliberately, hoping it will get them past filters. I understood as much, but how exactly do i do that, in terms of mysql-stored spamassassin user preferences? if i use un

Re: whitelist poisoned? spam getting through

Kelson Vibber schrieb: >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Simple answer: don't whitelist your own address. Some spammers will do this > deliberately, hoping it will get them past filters. I understood as much, but how exactly do i do that, in terms of mysql-stored spamassassin user preferences? if i

Re: whitelist poisoned? spam getting through

On Thursday 03 August 2006 11:02 pm, Mathias Homann wrote: > ohw can it be that the attached spam got through... the SA report > says "user in whitelist", thus it gave the spam a really high > negative score. How can that be, or rather, how can i stop it? Looks like they used the same address for

RE: whitelist include file

> -Original Message- > From: Payal Rathod [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 10:34 PM > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: whitelist include file > > On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 02:11:33PM -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote: > > Yo

Re: whitelist include file

On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 02:11:33PM -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote: > You could use an include, but just put the whitelist entries in > another file > named .cf, and you're done. SpamAssassin reads all .cf files in > /etc/mail/spamassassin -- local.cf is just the common one that gets used. Thanks a

Re: whitelist include file

Payal Rathod wrote: Hi, I plan to keep all my white_list from addresses in a separate file instead of local.cf. Can anyone please tell me how to use an include file in local.cf? With warm regards, -Payal Hi, Just call it anything you want but make sure it ends in .cf whitelist.cf seems l

Re: whitelist include file

On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 01:51:15PM -0400, Payal Rathod wrote: > I plan to keep all my white_list from addresses in a separate file > instead of local.cf. Can anyone please tell me how to use an include > file in local.cf? You could use an include, but just put the whitelist entries in another f

Re: Whitelist & blacklist order

I invoke spamassassin through Mailscanner v 4.38 I use Mailscanner with: - sendmail - clamav antivirus - spamassassin -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Whitelist+-+blacklist+order-t1649123.html#a4500915 Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users forum at Nabble.com.

Re: Whitelist & blacklist order

On May 19, 2006, at 2:28 AM, llerda wrote: Dear All, I have spamassassin with a whitelist and blacklist . blacklist is : ORDB-RBL SBL+XBL whitelist is, for example,: whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] How can I set-up sendmail to release all the mail in whitelist? I want the order: 1) whitel

Re: Whitelist testing with GTUBE

On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 02:48:34PM -0600, Joel Gudknecht wrote: > whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > to a whitelist.cf in /etc/mail/spamassassin and sent a GTUBE email. It > was still flagged. Is this normal, expected behavior? Yes. Here's some thoughts: You shouldn't try whitelisting your ow

Re: Whitelist misunderstanding regarding performance

On Sat, 04 Feb 2006 11:22:59 -0500, you wrote: >Eric Carlson wrote: >> SA 3.0.2 on FC3. I added a whitelist_from entry for the local domain >> in local.cf and understood it would add -100 to the score. The problem >> is performance of mantis, our bugtracker, which sends email for each >> action. T

Re: Whitelist misunderstanding regarding performance

Eric Carlson wrote: > SA 3.0.2 on FC3. I added a whitelist_from entry for the local domain > in local.cf and understood it would add -100 to the score. The problem > is performance of mantis, our bugtracker, which sends email for each > action. Turns out SA is still scanning each mail where I reall

Re: whitelist mailman lists

On Tue, 24 Jan 2006, mouss wrote: > Matthias Fuhrmann a écrit : > > Hello, > > > > we have some lists on a server maintained by mailman. since mails for > > moderators contains offten spammy content, those mails are rated as spam > > too. i tried whitelisting with for example: > > > > whitelist_fr

Re: whitelist mailman lists

On Tue, 24 Jan 2006, David B Funk wrote: Hello, [..] > Many mechanisms for calling SA do -not- make the envelope-from address > available for rule matching (including miltrassassin), thus the failure of > your whitelist_from_rcvd. our version currently runnign is: (using Revision: 1.15 Date: 200

Re: whitelist mailman lists

On Tue, 24 Jan 2006, Mike Jackson wrote: > > we have some lists on a server maintained by mailman. since mails for > > moderators contains offten spammy content, those mails are rated as spam > > too. i tried whitelisting with for example: > > > > whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] domain > > w

Re: whitelist mailman lists

On Tue, 24 Jan 2006, Matthias Fuhrmann wrote: > > > whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] domain > > > whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] 127.0.0.1 > > > > > > and some more, but all failed. > > > what went wrong, or does anyone know the correct pattern for > > > whitelist_from_rcvd and mailman

Re: whitelist mailman lists

Matthias Fuhrmann a écrit : > Hello, > > we have some lists on a server maintained by mailman. since mails for > moderators contains offten spammy content, those mails are rated as spam > too. i tried whitelisting with for example: > > whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] domain > whitelist_from

Re: whitelist mailman lists

we have some lists on a server maintained by mailman. since mails for moderators contains offten spammy content, those mails are rated as spam too. i tried whitelisting with for example: whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] domain whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] domain whitelist_from_rcvd

Re: whitelist mailman lists

On Tue, 24 Jan 2006, Vincenzo Martiello wrote: > Do you use this parameter in MaiScanner.conf ? > "Ignore Spam Whitelist If Recipients Exceed = " > [...] > > whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] domain > > whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] 127.0.0.1 > > > > and some more, but all failed. > >

Re: whitelist mailman lists

On Tue, 24 Jan 2006, Daniel J. Cody wrote: > Matthias Fuhrmann wrote: > > whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] domain > > whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] domain > > whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] domain > > whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] 127.0.0.1 > > > > and some more, but al

Re: whitelist mailman lists

Matthias Fuhrmann wrote: whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] domain whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] domain whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] domain whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] 127.0.0.1 and some more, but all failed. what went wrong, or does anyone know the correct pattern

Re: whitelist mailman lists

Do you use this parameter in MaiScanner.conf ? "Ignore Spam Whitelist If Recipients Exceed = " bye vincenzo Matthias Fuhrmann wrote: Hello, we have some lists on a server maintained by mailman. since mails for moderators contains offten spammy content, those mails are rated as spam to

RE: whitelist file

> > To Better-Scripters-Than-Me: would this work? I know there's probably a better way, but if it works as written, it would avoid creating duplicate email addresses. Much easier to remove the duplicates with a 'sort -u' once you've finished appending.

Re: Whitelist one, whitelist all

On Tue, 13 Dec 2005, Kai Schaetzl wrote: > Steven Stern wrote on Mon, 12 Dec 2005 20:55:59 -0600: > > > I'm doing this via spamass-milter at the MTA stage. > > Then the milter have to split all incoming messages in one per recipient > and only check then. If it doesn't do this you are stuck at thi

RE: whitelist file

ks as written, it would avoid creating duplicate email addresses. Karl > > -Original Message- > From: Loren Wilton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 12:07 PM > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: whitelist file > > A file call

RE: whitelist file

--Original Message- From: Loren Wilton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 12:07 PM To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: whitelist file A file called for instance "whilelist.cf" is a text file. You could have one of those that users could edit

Re: whitelist file

A file called for instance "whilelist.cf" is a text file. You could have one of those that users could edit in the SA site rules directory, but it would generally be a bad idea. If users have shell accounts, they could I believe put whitelist entries in user_prefs in their .spamassassin directori

Re: Whitelist one, whitelist all

Steven Stern wrote on Mon, 12 Dec 2005 20:55:59 -0600: > I'm doing this via spamass-milter at the MTA stage. Then the milter have to split all incoming messages in one per recipient and only check then. If it doesn't do this you are stuck at this point. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get

Re: Whitelist one, whitelist all

Matt Kettler wrote: Steven Stern wrote: I have one user who insists on seeing all mail sent to her. (OK, it's my wife.) I added "all_spam_to [EMAIL PROTECTED]" to local.cf and that makes it work for her. However, if there are other recipients bcc'd on the the email, then the all_spam_to negati

Re: Whitelist one, whitelist all

Steven Stern wrote: > I have one user who insists on seeing all mail sent to her. (OK, it's my > wife.) > > I added "all_spam_to [EMAIL PROTECTED]" to local.cf and that makes it work > for her. However, if there are other recipients bcc'd on the the email, > then the all_spam_to negative score get

Re: Whitelist one, whitelist all

Steven Stern wrote: I have one user who insists on seeing all mail sent to her. (OK, it's my wife.) I added "all_spam_to [EMAIL PROTECTED]" to local.cf and that makes it work for her. However, if there are other recipients bcc'd on the the email, then the all_spam_to negative score gets appli

Re: Whitelist one, whitelist all

Steven Stern wrote: I have one user who insists on seeing all mail sent to her. (OK, it's my wife.) I added "all_spam_to [EMAIL PROTECTED]" to local.cf and that makes it work for her. However, if there are other recipients bcc'd on the the email, then the all_spam_to negative score gets appli

Re: whitelist not recognized?

Thijs Koetsier wrote: > I'm running spamassassin 3.0.4 on Debian-exim. > > In my /etc/spamassassin/whitelist.cf I've this line: > > whitelist_to [EMAIL PROTECTED] OK; inbound mail sent to this *EXACT* address will be whitelisted. Note that you're probably better off just not passing mail for t

Re: whitelist not recognized?

Use "all_spam_to" instead of "whitelist_to". Thijs Koetsier wrote: Hi all, I'm running spamassassin 3.0.4 on Debian-exim. In my /etc/spamassassin/whitelist.cf I've this line: whitelist_to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Today, this user recieved an e-mail marked as spam with

Re: Whitelist not working...

Richard Hobbs wrote: > Hello, > > Thank you for your reply, and apologies for my delay in replying again. > > If these emails are never going to match the whitelist, is there a way I can > always allow emails from certain addresses in a fool-proof way? > > The addresses I need to allow though ar

Re: Whitelist not working...

You can use whitelist_from. This will only match on the From address, so is quite spoofable. Loren

RE: Whitelist not working...

Original Message- > From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 18 August 2005 18:18 > To: Richard Hobbs > Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: Whitelist not working... > > > > > > Richard Hobbs wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Her

Re: Whitelist not working...

Richard Hobbs wrote: > Hello, > > Here are the headers of one of the emails from a receipient in the > whitelist. I have replaced sensitive information with and @ symbols > with [at] in case this gets archived anywhere. > > It all looks normal to me... Any ideas? Well it looks normal, b

RE: Whitelist not working...

: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 16 August 2005 19:22 > To: Richard Hobbs > Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: Whitelist not working... > > Richard Hobbs wrote: > > Hello, > > > > In an attempt to always allow emails from particular

Re: Whitelist not working...

Richard Hobbs wrote: > Hello, > > In an attempt to always allow emails from particular domains, I have added > the following lines into "/etc/spamassassin/local.cf": > > def_whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] inmac.co.uk > def_whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] Inmac.co.uk > d

Re: Whitelist works only for "Return-Path" field

Joao Gazzoni wrote: > Hello, > > One message have these headers: > From: Sucesu - RS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > And the SA whitelist have this record: > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] yes That's not a spamassassin whitelist ent

Re: whitelist v.s. negative values

At 09:26 AM 5/31/2005, Thomas Deaton wrote: We're getting a lot of spam spoofed from people on our whitlists. I was thinking about removing them from the whitelist and putting them in the spam.assassin.prefs.conf under "From:" with a negative value. Does this sound like a good idea? why not

<    1   2   3   4   5   >