Jeff,
I've been running VNC on Solaris 9 (9/04 with no patches) for a while
now with no problem. However my Solaris 8 (2/04, but with the latest
recommended patches) is showing this problem. Can you give us some more
detail as to how you found the problem (so I can verify it's the same
one),
Alasdair:
I just checked again against my Solaris 9 (9/04 but with patches) and the
window disappears after I login This was the version I ran my tests
against so I'm surprised it works for you.
I tracked the error down (using the trace facility of xdm along with the
X6.3.1 source for xdm)
as far as I know, there is no coded limit (someone please correct me if
inaccurate). however, each viewer will consume X network bandwidth
giving a limiting factor there. also, the viewers must connect in shared
mode or each new connection will disconnect the previous connections.
-Original
Harjit,
The authentication stage of a VNC Enterprise Edition connection is
encrypted, since it is considered part of the session. Encrypting the
session wouldn't really make much sense otherwise... :)
Wez @ RealVNC Ltd.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
Harjit,
If you set shared mode on either the server or on the viewers then you can
connect multiple viewers to the server at the same time.
Regards,
Wez @ RealVNC Ltd.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Singh,
Harjit (Mission
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 3/22/2005 12:58 PM
To: Singh, Harjit (Mission Systems); VNC-List@realvnc.com
Cc:
Subject: RE: VNC 4.0 for Windows
Harjit,
If you set shared mode on either the server or on the viewers then you
22, 2005 13:25
To: James Weatherall; VNC-List@realvnc.com
Subject: RE: VNC 4.0 for Windows
James,
Does shared mode provide a viewer to set an independent connection to
server and issue commands to it. Will the effects of commands be
observed by all the other viewers connected to server real time
Since this appears to be a font problem, please can you let me know
which fonts VNC needs access to on Solaris, and I'll try only specifying
them.
I never saw a response to this. So I thought I'd kick in my $0.02.
I am running VNC4.0 on Solaris 8 (2/04), via inetd. My inetd.conf
line is thus:
that you might at least try a different WM.
John
-Original Message-
From: Alasdair Ferro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2005 6:37 AM
To: Sean Kamath
Cc: vnc-list@realvnc.com
Subject: Re: VNC 4.0 on Soalris 8 with inetd
Since this appears to be a font problem
John,
I've tried CDE, Openwindows and Failsafe logins, and they all do the
same! Bear in mind that I'm using XDMP to do the login, so my
~/.vnc/xstartup script never gets read.
Also I'm on Solaris 8, so CDE or OpenWindows are my only options (I
don't really want to download install GNOME!)
of the REAL experts on the list will have a suggestion. :-)
Good luck!
John
-Original Message-
From: Alasdair Ferro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2005 10:25 AM
To: vnc-list@realvnc.com
Cc: John Aldrich
Subject: Re: VNC 4.0 on Soalris 8 with inetd
John,
I've
[In a message on Fri, 11 Mar 2005 15:25:05 GMT,
Alasdair Ferro wrote:]
John,
I've tried CDE, Openwindows and Failsafe logins, and they all do the
same! Bear in mind that I'm using XDMP to do the login, so my
~/.vnc/xstartup script never gets read.
Oh. So you're running Xvnc, and telling it
Since this appears to be a font problem, please can you let me know
which fonts VNC needs access to on Solaris, and I'll try only specifying
them.
Cheers,
Alasdair
I am running VNC4.0 on Solaris 8 (2/04), via inetd. My inetd.conf
line is thus:
vnc-1152x864x24 stream tcp nowait root
[In a message on Thu, 10 Mar 2005 10:37:25 GMT,
Alasdair Ferro wrote:]
Since this appears to be a font problem, please can you let me know
which fonts VNC needs access to on Solaris, and I'll try only specifying
them.
Cheers,
I never saw a response to this. So I thought I'd kick in my
Alasdair Ferro wrote:
CBee the rest of the list :-)
I'd begun to wonder if it was a CDE issue. I've tried an Openwindows
login, but that fails in the same way. I've googled for the warning,
with no joy - any suggestions on something else to try? I'm very much
feeling my way around Solaris, so
I'd begun to wonder if it was a CDE issue. I've tried an Openwindows
login, but that fails in the same way. I've googled for the warning,
with no joy - any suggestions on something else to try? I'm very much
feeling my way around Solaris, so do suggest things that you think
are obvious!
I'd begun to wonder if it was a CDE issue. I've tried an Openwindows
login, but that fails in the same way. I've googled for the warning,
with no joy - any suggestions on something else to try? I'm very much
feeling my way around Solaris, so do suggest things that you think
are obvious!
I
Alasdair Ferro wrote:
Hello,
I hope you can help, as google et. al have proved unable to!
I am running VNC4.0 on Solaris 8 (2/04), via inetd. My inetd.conf line
is thus:
vnc-1152x864x24 stream tcp nowait root /space/tools/bin/Xvnc Xvnc
-inetd -query localhost -once -geometry 1152x864 -depth 24
CBee the rest of the list :-)
I'd begun to wonder if it was a CDE issue. I've tried an Openwindows
login, but that fails in the same way. I've googled for the warning,
with no joy - any suggestions on something else to try? I'm very much
feeling my way around Solaris, so do suggest things that
It looks like they are using tightVNC to do this, It may already be
what you want by modifying the tight vnc java client may provide some
insight.
--Angelo
On Wed, 2 Feb 2005 00:37:57 -0800 (PST), hendrik stey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello.
I have found this VNC-Demo from SOT:
http://www.gotomyvnc.com which will allow you to test your VNC to see if the
ports are open. Also, you could try checking with ComCast to see if they are
blocking port 590x and 580x. Or you could use a VPN or ssh-like app (i.e
stunnel or Zebedee) to tunnel the vnc connection between work and home.
to not work with version 4.
I appreciate any help.
Regards,
Gustavo
-Original Message-
From: Chris Goodwin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: terga-feira, 28 de setembro de 2004 09:53
To: Gustavo Aguiar; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: VNC 4.0 Registry entries
Gustavo,
You can find
business.
http://www.sandware.net
voice: 910.639.3055
- Original Message -
From: Gustavo Aguiar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Chris Goodwin [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2004 8:52 AM
Subject: RE: VNC 4.0 Registry entries
Hi Chris,
The thing is, I've already
Gustavo,
The VNC Server Properties dialog is only accessible to Administrators under
VNC 4, so there is no separate VNC option to disable the menu item.
Wez @ RealVNC Ltd.
- Original Message -
From: Gustavo Aguiar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 27,
September 2004 14:29
To: Gustavo Aguiar; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: VNC 4.0 Registry entries
Correct, as noted in the TightVNC documentation and others,
WinVNC4 does not support the extra settings that v3 did.
TightVNC does support them through adding them to the v3
settings directory
30, 2004 10:53 AM
Subject: RE: VNC 4.0 Registry entries
Chris,
Your statement is misleading. TightVNC and other projects based on VNC
3.3
have a number of settings accessible only via registry entries, termed
Advanced Settings.
VNC 4 either provides settings through the GUI interfaces
Gustavo,
You can find the entries on your system by running Regedit
(Start\Run\regedit), pressing F3 (find), and searching for VNC. This
should locate the keys you're looking for regardless of your flavor of
Windows. The keys/values are pretty self-explainatory.
Good luck!
Chris Goodwin
I found a Gentoo-forum question that solved my problem. It says that VNC
does not set the numeric keypad for use. A keyboard mapping for the
numeric keypad is given in the article. For those interested, follow the
link at
a
Has anyone else seen this problem? Anyone know a work-around
that works consistently?
Click on the (local) taskbar so that it has focus, then click back inside
the full-screen viewer window. The viewer should then cover the taskbar.
This is a featurette of Windows.
Wez @ RealVNC Ltd.
Do you have an extremely large screen on the server? There is a sanity
check in the code to make sure that the ZRLE encoder doesn't allocate a
huge buffer. It's possible you're exceeding it (I should probably make
the default quite a bit larger).
You could try forcing 8-bit colour mode by
Prabir,
Disable VNC 3, or set VNC 3 and VNC 4 to use different ports / display
numbers. E.g. set VNC 4 to use Port 5900 and VNC 3 to use Display Number 1.
Wez @ RealVNC Ltd.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Prabir Dutt
Sent: 14
PROTECTED]
Sent: 18 June 2004 20:06
To: James Weatherall
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: VNC 4.0 - mouse/kbd hang after unlock win2k box
mouse/kbd stop responding to actions from x2vnc on vnc
server machine ...
after the unlock (done by typing password and selecting
ok via x2vnc from
Shaw, Kevin wrote:
All,
I'm having the exact same problem on Solaris 7. Solaris 8 is on a Ultra30
and Solaris 7 is on a E250.
I have the latest patch cluster on Solaris 8. I searched the patch report to
make sure I have the latest patches for the FFB frame buffer also.
Does anyone know the syntax
William Hooper wrote:
Pasztuhov Daniel said:
Hi,
I tried out the new version of VNC (4.0) and I have some troubles with
that:
I try to start a vncserver on a SuSE 9.0 linux box as:
vncserver :2 -securitytypes=none
Actually it looks like the problem is that you have an old Xvnc on your
path.
Hi,
Tristan Richardson wrote:
William Hooper wrote:
Pasztuhov Daniel said:
Hi,
I tried out the new version of VNC (4.0) and I have some troubles with
that:
I try to start a vncserver on a SuSE 9.0 linux box as:
vncserver :2 -securitytypes=none
Actually it looks like the problem is that you have
All,
I'm having the exact same problem on Solaris 7. Solaris 8 is on a Ultra30
and Solaris 7 is on a E250.
I have the latest patch cluster on Solaris 8. I searched the patch report to
make sure I have the latest patches for the FFB frame buffer also.
Does anyone know the syntax for -log ? I
Pasztuhov Daniel said:
Hi,
I tried out the new version of VNC (4.0) and I have some troubles with
that:
I try to start a vncserver on a SuSE 9.0 linux box as:
vncserver :2 -securitytypes=none
Quoting the Xvnc man page:
-SecurityTypes sec-types
S and T are capitalized and there is
I had something similar to this in the following scenario:
1. Uninstalled VNC 3.3.7 on NT 4 TS system
2. Installed VNC 4.0 and imported legacy settings
3. Checked service was running
4. Tried to connect with VNC 4.0 viewer
Something flashes on screen but it wouldn't connect. Rebooted the host
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Original Message
Hello VNC users,
i want to start vnc on a HP UX 10.20 machine, but there is
an error message:
# x0vncserver -h
/usr/lib/dld.sl: Can't open shared library: /usr/lib/libdld.2
/usr/lib/dld.sl: No such file or directory
Do I need another
Twas brillig, and [EMAIL PROTECTED] scrobe:
Original Message
Hello VNC users,
i want to start vnc on a HP UX 10.20 machine, but there is
an error message:
# x0vncserver -h
/usr/lib/dld.sl: Can't open shared library: /usr/lib/libdld.2
/usr/lib/dld.sl: No such file or
Ken,
You've described the steps to recreate the problem you're seeing, but not
what the actual problem is. What is the problem?
Wez @ RealVNC Ltd.
___
VNC-List mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To remove yourself from the list visit:
mouse/kbd stop responding to actions from x2vnc on vnc server machine ...
after the unlock (done by typing password and selecting ok via x2vnc
from solaris box), when I move the mouse or type on the kbd from the
solaris box , nothing happens on the win2k vnc server
If the screen was NOT locked,
Ken,
The mouse flicker that you describe is an artefact of a more complete
capture method used by VNC Server 4.0, which ensures that alpha-blended
windows menus are displayed.
What is puzzling is that you say that you get this problem with x2vnc. The
mouse will only flicker when there are
Wez,
thanks for the info ...
I had a report of a problem from a co-worker who uses x2vnc, and thought
I was seeing the same issue/behavior when I was connecting via the viewer
I have since installed x2vnc 1.6, and see that the cursor doesn't blink ...
and after checking with the co-worker, came
On Tue, 2004-06-15 at 17:22 +0100, James Weatherall wrote:
New Windows Features Improvements vs VNC 3.3.7:
- New keyboard handling algorithms
For viewer?
We had a problem about the keyboard layout both in VNC 4 beta series and
VNC 3.3.7. Here we go again:
When the server is Linux, in POSIX
Hi Jeff,
There were only a very few bugs to fix as a result of feedback on
4.0b5. From memory I think there were two main bugs fixed:
- Invalid cursor cropping (found by Tim Waugh)
- WinVNC sometimes exiting with an Invalid cursor handle error
Cheers
Tristan
On Tue, 2004-06-15 at 18:19, Jeff
On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 05:19:54PM +0100, James Weatherall wrote:
RealVNC is pleased to announce a new public beta release of VNC 4.0. VNC
4.0 is a complete redesign of the VNC system, but maintains backwards
compatibility with the old VNC 3 releases.
Hi,
It's great that beta 5 is finally
Tim Waugh wrote:
On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 05:19:54PM +0100, James Weatherall wrote:
RealVNC is pleased to announce a new public beta release of VNC 4.0. VNC
4.0 is a complete redesign of the VNC system, but maintains backwards
compatibility with the old VNC 3 releases.
There are a number of
Thanks a lot !
CU
. \)|(/
. (o o)
. /-ooO(_)Ooo-\
.(_| Francis VIVAT |
. |CETP-CNRS |
. | 10-12, avenue de l'Europe 78140 Velizy
David Sigafoos said:
The file downloads as vnc-40b4-x86_win32.exe. Is it just misnamed or does
the link download the wrong one
Are you sure you aren't looking at a cached page? Try:
http://www.realvnc.com/4.0b5-download.html
--
William Hooper
___
TCP vs. UDP? Thus is the port you forward set up as
a TCP port or maybe as a UDP port?
Would swap your modem for something else, e.g. rule
out the modem (or not ;-) ) as the source of the problem.
Sincerely,
Jan.
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Sertar Yalciner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I set it up as TCP.
but, how would you comment on succesfully getting the
rfb 003.007 prompt against the telnet/ftp?
--- Haan, Jan de [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
TCP vs. UDP? Thus is the port you forward set up as
a TCP port or maybe as a UDP port?
Would swap your modem for something else,
On Friday 02 January 2004 20:04, Sertar Yalciner wrote:
Hi,
I have spent two days searching the net but could not
get my scenario work. Any help will be greatly
appreciated.
- I have vnc4 listening port 9000 on win2k
- my dsl modem translates the port 21 to port 9000 on
internal vnc server
I would like to use port 9000 on the modem but I am
also behind a NAT in the office and I am only allowed
for ftp and http. I use http for my modem's remote
mgmt and the ftp port is the only one left. In th
emean time, what you suggest seems logical (i.e.
modem's tracking of ftp flow.) I will
Sounds like the whole point of Trusted Solaris is to stop things like VNC.
I doubt it will be possible to run an x0vncserver on this box unless you
replace its X server with an ordinary Solaris X server (thereby reducing the
security of the system).
They've taken out the XTest extension from the
, 2003 11:32 AM
To: Bryan Berkowitz; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: VNC 4.0 beta on Trusted Solaris 8
Sounds like the whole point of Trusted Solaris is to stop things like VNC. I
doubt it will be possible to run an x0vncserver on this box unless you
replace its X server with an ordinary Solaris X
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 07:57:06PM +0100, James ''Wez'' Weatherall wrote:
RealVNC is pleased to announce a new public beta release of VNC 4.0.
VNC 4.0 is a complete redesign of the VNC system, but maintains
backwards compatibility with the old VNC 3 releases.
Works well for me. I still
I needed this patch to compile VNC 4.0 Beta 3 on some platforms.
Tim.
*/
--- vnc-4.0b3-unixsrc/Xregion/Makefile.in.fPIC 2003-03-31 16:07:29.0 +0100
+++ vnc-4.0b3-unixsrc/Xregion/Makefile.in 2003-08-01 10:35:14.0 +0100
@@ -12,4 +12,5 @@
$(AR) $(library) $(OBJS)
William Hooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Any thoughts?
I defined `max' in the header before it was used.
___
VNC-List mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To remove yourself from the list visit:
http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
Dave Love said:
William Hooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Any thoughts?
I defined `max' in the header before it was used.
I think this might be a case of too much snipping, but huh? Could you
elaborate?
--
William Hooper
___
VNC-List mailing list
Dave Love said:
Jerry McBride [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm having compile problems with the unix sources on Gentoo 1.4. I'm
running
the latest stable versions of just about everything... including gcc
3.2.3.
Remove the offending declaration and replace it with an include of
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 08:07:37PM +0100, James Weatherall wrote:
RealVNC is pleased to announce the first public beta release of VNC 4.0.
This is great news!
Do you have an idea of when a final VNC 4.0 release might happen?
Thanks,
Tim. .. off to beta test
*/
[demime 0.99d.1 removed an
Tim Waugh said:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 11:52:26AM -0400, William Hooper wrote:
Using RHL 9 (gcc-3.2.2) that gets me past x0vncserver, but then I get
errors building vncviewer:
make[1]: Entering directory
`/home/whooper/build/vnc-4.0b3-unixsrc/vncviewer'
[snip]
make[1]: *** [CConn.o] Error
Scott,
Your notes omit to mention the ZRLE encoding, which provides equivalent
compression over slow links to the Tight encoding. :)
Cheers,
--
Dr. James Wez Weatherall
RealVNC Ltd. - http://www.realvnc.com - The Home of VNC
--
As William suggests...please feel free to post any
Jeff Boerio [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I also have not been successful at all with HP-UX compiles (don't have
gcc 2.9x for HP). I haven't tried Solaris yet.
The client side doesn't compile with recent versions of the
proprietary compilers on Irix, Tru64 or Solaris. (It is C++, after
all.)
Hello all,
Windows tooltips now seem to work in the VNC 4.0b3
release.
Well done for such an excellent piece of software.
Best regards,
Roland Rosier
-Original Message-
From: James Weatherall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 20:08
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: William Hooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Li, Charles said:
What is the difference between realvnc and tightvnc?
Which is better?
What is the difference between blue and red?
Which is better?
I, as a user, see the next differences:
RealVNC: the
and results in large jumps in position.
Best Regards,
Roland Rosier
-Original Message-
From: Rosier, Roland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 08:54
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: VNC 4.0 Beta 3
Hello all,
Windows tooltips now seem to work in the VNC
I installed the new beta. My gnome session is not working anymore. Only get
the grey X screen and nothing else.
Here is my xstartup:
unset SESSION_MANAGER
exec /etc/X11/xinit/xinitrc
Amy suggestions?
Thanks
AR
___
VNC-List mailing list
Jerry McBride [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm having compile problems with the unix sources on Gentoo 1.4. I'm running
the latest stable versions of just about everything... including gcc 3.2.3.
Remove the offending declaration and replace it with an include of
X11/extensions/XShm.h. I've sent
I have gotten the sources to build on Red Hat 7.1 for both Pentium and
Itanium platforms. gcc 2.96 is what I used successfully for both. I
was NOT able to do this with gcc 3.x and have reported the feedback to
Real VNC.
I also have not been successful at all with HP-UX compiles (don't have
gcc
On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 13:48, Mike Miller wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jul 2003, William Hooper wrote:
Li, Charles said:
What is the difference between realvnc and tightvnc?
Which is better?
What is the difference between blue and red?
They are that different now?
blue and red have been
Li, Charles said:
What is the difference between realvnc and tightvnc?
Which is better?
What is the difference between blue and red?
Which is better?
Sorry to make the point that way, but that is basically what you are
asking. Try both TightVNC and RealVNC and use the one that fits best in
On Mon, 28 Jul 2003, William Hooper wrote:
Is there no information on the web that lists the differences?
I doubt it. What's the point, there is no competition between them.
It's not that they are competing to win a prize, but every user has to
make a choice. A web page designed to help
Mike Miller said:
On Mon, 28 Jul 2003, William Hooper wrote:
Is there no information on the web that lists the differences?
I doubt it. What's the point, there is no competition between them.
It's not that they are competing to win a prize, but every user has to
make a choice. A web
75 matches
Mail list logo
