Based on my experience with many thermal transfer agents for higher
temperatures I think water remains the unique choice . Mercury as used in a
process of converting cyclohexanol to cyclohexanone) is prohibitely
expensive and very toxic- while organic agents as Diphyl (diphenil oxide
plus
Stremmenos Paper does not take about 4H + Ni60, The paper takes about a
single neutral hydrogen atom H + Ni58. Rossi says the same thing.
we adopt the hypothesis of trapping a neutral temporary atom, or a mini
atom, of hydrogen (with a diameter less than *10ˆ-14 m*) which transforms
the
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 6:35 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
Maxwell's equations were developed to describe laboratory electricity and
magnetism experiments.
...from which the peculiar perpendicular nature of the phenomenon was
already
evident.
Not really. Electric and magnetic fields in
As in a solar thermal system, use molten salts such as sodium and potassium
nitrate or a combination of the two.
It is cheaper to have 1000 thin molten salts pipes and a high pressure heat
exchange, then 1000 high pressure steam pipes.
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 3:50 AM, Peter Gluck
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 7:33 PM, Mark Iverson zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
Robin hits the nail on the head... Anything mathematical is the MODEL, and
is supposed to reflect physical reality. My question was about the physical
world -- what I was asking got was a rational, qualitative, cause and
not a bad idea if the salts are sufficiently stable,some problems of safety
both with nitrates and (!) cyanides/
Perhaps on internal circuit. well closed a amd an outer with water.
The problem of contacting a very hot surface remains for molten salts too.
Peter
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 11:04 AM,
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 7:06 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Cude I will assert that tools do not make a carpenter, and that my views
boil down to an assertion that cold fusion researchers are bad carpenters.
Rothwell For this to be the case, they would all have to be
On 05/26/2011 05:09 AM, Joshua Cude wrote:
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 7:33 PM, Mark Iversonzeropo...@charter.net wrote:
Robin hits the nail on the head... Anything mathematical is the MODEL, and
is supposed to reflect physical reality. My question was about the physical
world -- what
Axel, Robin, ... and others.
So far, everyone has danced around offering any conjecture pertaining to my
original question.
The crux of my original question was:
When a chain reaction is initiated what are the speculated temperature
ranges, both the high AND LOW VALUES?
Plenty of discussion
On Thu, 26 May 2011 03:05:02 Joshua wrote
[snip] To the extent they believe cold fusion is real based on existing
measurements, then in the opinion of mainstream science, they are mistaken.
Every last one of them.[/snip]
Josh,
are you implying that that all the claims of heat anomalies
Steven,
I may be in a minority but I am convinced this is the same reaction as
Mill's, Moller and Langmuir which requires changing states between h1 and h2
but since I am also convinced the Rydberg and hydrinos states are what Naudts
proposed as being relativistic or in this case
They are not. If you vary the phase angle all of Special Relativity pops out.
http://www.wbabin.net/science/znidarsic.pdf
Frank Znidarsic
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 8:46 AM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson
orionwo...@charter.net wrote:
But so far no one has discussed and/or offered any speculation as to the
lower temperature limit. IOW, how cool can the chain reaction be kept
more-or-less sustainable?
I think the control of
I realize that this is routinely trivialized, rationalized away and ignored;
nonetheless, those who do so are merely dancing around the real question here!
Why are em fields perpendicular (when one is inducing the other, purely
speaking?) This is a fascinating question, especially because
Frank,
The math exceeds my skill set but I agree matter is real from a
WSM or standing wave perspective and I even understand your posit that SR pops
out of varying this phase angle. My only comment is regarding the semantic
issues that always accompany this topic. One could
Pioneering the Applications of Interphasal Resonances
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/teslafy/
--- On Wed, 5/25/11, Mark Iverson zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
From: Mark Iverson zeropo...@charter.net
Subject: RE: [Vo]: Why are the electric and magnetic fields perpendicular?
To:
Observation of the Dynamical Casimir Effect in a Superconducting
Circuithttp://nextbigfuture.com/2011/05/observation-of-dynamical-casimir-effect.html
http://nextbigfuture.com/2011/05/observation-of-dynamical-casimir-effect.html
Some interesting speculation on what's inside the Ekits:
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/news/2011/SpeculativeRenderingsRossiEnergyCatalyzer20111.shtml
T
From Axel
If you need an exact number, the start temperature is not
that high. In the Sweden test, the water temperature was
pushed up to 60C by the external heater before the reaction
became gainful.
The internal heater was also in action. So my guess is that
the temperature of the
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110519181732AAeyuIL
What are some uses of attracting the polarity of water?
Pioneering the Applications of Interphasal Resonances
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/teslafy/
While many branches of scientific inquiry have made incredible strides over
the past century, earthquake prediction science has been woefully slow to
make advancements that could lead to accurate scientific forewarning of
pending earthquakes. Reports of unusual pre-earthquake atmospheric
I was looking through my DVD taping collection and found this one relevant to
todays posting.
http://youtu.be/NsOM_BOz-Y8
Adding an resonant inductor load in space to correct excessive phase angle
found over 180 degrees.
Pioneering the Applications of Interphasal Resonances
Seems to give some support to the claims that HAARP is being used to create
earthquakes.
Certainly it is interesting that these atmospheric anomalies have only been
reported with the recent earthquake spate.
Of course maybe this is valid as an indication of an imminent natural
earthquake, but
Speaking of predicting earthquakes, here is an astounding article:
Trial set for Italian seismologists charged with manslaughter over failed
quake warning
In reply to OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson's message of Thu, 26 May 2011
14:48:52 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
From Axel
If you need an exact number, the start temperature is not
that high. In the Sweden test, the water temperature was
pushed up to 60C by the external heater before the reaction
In reply to Joshua Cude's message of Thu, 26 May 2011 05:03:48 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
If even one of them is correct about the calorimetry, tritium, helium and
other evidence, then the effect is real after all.
Now, that's just ridiculous. Of course, many -- even most, possibly even all
-- of the
From Robin:
...
What makes you think it has to be 400 C to start?
Nothing would tickle me more to learn that the initialization temperature
is less than that 400 C. But then, maybe it needs to be greater than 400 C.
I dunno! My initial starting point was loosely based on previous literature
FYI
http://www.nyteknik.se/incoming/article3144960.ece/BINARY/Download+the+report+by+Kullander+and+Ess%C3%A9n+%28pdf%29.
*Initial running to reach vaporization. *The temperatures of the inlet water
and the outlet water were monitored and recorded every 2 seconds. The heater
was connected
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Thu, 26 May 2011 03:53:45 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
Stremmenos Paper does not take about 4H + Ni60, The paper takes about a
single neutral hydrogen atom H + Ni58. Rossi says the same thing.
And both may be wrong.
we adopt the hypothesis of trapping a neutral
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Thu, 26 May 2011 18:55:32 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
*Initial running to reach vaporization. *The temperatures of the inlet water
and the outlet water were monitored and recorded every 2 seconds. The heater
was connected at 10:25 and the boiling point was reached at
On 05/26/2011 01:33 PM, Wm. Scott Smith wrote:
I realize that this is routinely trivialized, rationalized away and ignored;
nonetheless, those who do so are merely dancing around the real question here!
Why are em fields perpendicular (when one is inducing the other, purely
speaking?)
Are
Axel, Robin,
Thank you, both of you, for humoring me.
I was aware of the March 29 report. I had already downloaded it. I was also
aware of Figure 6 showing the evolution of temperature changes over time.
However, having Axel specifically point out the kink that is recorded at
around 60 C was
http://www.cnn.com/2011/POLITICS/05/26/wisconsin.collective.bargaining/index
.html?hpt=T2
Next stop: the Wisconsin Supreme Court, assuming they will take the case.
(Most likely they will.)
FYI: The You Tube link supplied below was actual footage I took on the
evening of March 9 when Wisconsin
Excuse me for writing this here- Joshua Cude's hostility against CF and
especially the E-cat could be used in a positive way. Joshua, please tell
what would be a *PERFECT EXPERIMENT-* absolutely convincing for you- setup,
instruments, measurements everything- telling it works or NOT? Thank you in
As far as atmospheric heating, I can't say... as far as geomagnetic
disturbances prior to EQs, I
think its VERY likely!
This is based on the following first hand observations...
I have a close friend who spent 30 years in electrical engineering, and 20 of
that was making all
kinds of very
Some more questions
Where the plot of the electrical power vs time is ?
Where the monitoring of Rossi hands over the pump and heaters controls is ?
Where the steam dryness measures are ?
2011/5/27 OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson orionwo...@charter.net
Axel, Robin,
Thank you, both of you,
With all the interaction that JC has had on this discussion group, he should be
well aware that most
contributors on this list are probably at least as knowledgeable as he, and
probably much more so.
His statement about the language of physics is math is obvious. And CH's
suspicions are
37 matches
Mail list logo
