And, to be completely clean, aParent needs to be declared.
On Jan 10, 2008, at 12:05 AM, James C. Lee wrote:
Thought I'd follow up just in case someone needs this in the future
and
searches the archive. Here's what we did (the code in my original
email
missed the dispose()). Thanks for the
Hi,
As per the client requirement, we have to develop an application on
webObjects 5.2.
So I would like to know that how many license of the software, my
organization need to buy so that a team of 4 persons can work
simultaneously.
Regards,
Rohit Goel
LOL, I just added one myself under the Java Client portion (which I
rewrote today).
http://wiki.objectstyle.org/confluence/display/WO/Java+Client-Overview
Dave
On Jan 9, 2008, at 8:02 PM, Lachlan Deck wrote:
Hi Paolo,
On 08/01/2008, at 9:36 AM, Paolo Sommaruga wrote:
I have made quite a
Hi all, especially you Java Client people out there.
While I can easily build a FS in my client-side Java code and execute
it, does anyone know if it is possible, and if so, how to, call a FS
that is defined in the .eomodel file from a client-side class?
Right now, if I try calling it, I
Hey Paolo,
Thanks for this! I haven't had a chance to do anything with it yet,
but anything that will make JC development better is VERY welcome.
I have a D2JC project right now that I want to transition to straight-
Swing JC. Is there anyway to use/convert the XML that I can grab out
of
Wow, this Answer saved me from getting crazy...
I tried for 7 hours now, the some Problem. I recreate the Project 5
times, and and
but, WHYY
Thanks anyway you helped me a lot
Ken Ishimoto
On 2007/12/22, at 9:43, Craig St Jean wrote:
Wow, that was easy... I moved the
Hey Flor,
You should take a look at what Paolo Sommaruga has done with his
JPBindings framework http://www.jpaso.com/name/
XMLBindingForJavaClient. In it he is using EODisplayGroup and
EOAssociation, so he may have more to add on what they do and don't do.
I _LOVE_ that we have two
Is that there by default after a successful WO install? I don't
recall having to do this on the single Leopard machine that I have
setup.
Chuck
On Jan 9, 2008, at 10:20 PM, Guido Neitzer wrote:
On 09.01.2008, at 21:53, Chuck Hill wrote:
In a way, that is good. wotaskd is not running
Does anyone have any experience with 10.5.1 server? I
have eclipse and wolips loaded, my app runs fine
inside eclipse. When I follow the instruction in the
furfly tutorial, the app finally starts. But when I
click on the highlighted name, I get a web page that
says:
Exception Description:
Hi David,
On Jan 10, 2008, at 8:56 AM, David Avendasora wrote:
Hey Flor,
You should take a look at what Paolo Sommaruga has done with his
JPBindings framework http://www.jpaso.com/name/
XMLBindingForJavaClient. In it he is using EODisplayGroup and
EOAssociation, so he may have more to
Hi,
I'm trying to migrate an application to Eclipse; all seems to be fine
except I have a big speed issue when I'm running it from Eclipse.
The application is very very slow, it can take between 10-20 s. to
return a new page; sometimes I can get the message «No Instance
Available».
All
Hi Ken,
On Jan 10, 2008, at 8:55 AM, Ken Ishimoto wrote:
Wow, this Answer saved me from getting crazy...
I tried for 7 hours now, the some Problem. I recreate the Project 5
times, and and
but, WHYY
There are different project layouts in WOLips. One of the big
differences
On Jan 10, 2008, at 8:18 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
Is that there by default after a successful WO install? I don't
recall having to do this on the single Leopard machine that I have
setup.
The Xcode 3.0 tools which contain WO 5.4 no longer include a WO
startup item script. So when Xcode
On 10.01.2008, at 10:59, Jacky Gagnon wrote:
I'm trying to migrate an application to Eclipse; all seems to be
fine except I have a big speed issue when I'm running it from Eclipse.
The application is very very slow, it can take between 10-20 s. to
return a new page; sometimes I can get the
On Jan 10, 2008, at 10:48 AM, Art Isbell wrote:
On Jan 10, 2008, at 8:18 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
Is that there by default after a successful WO install? I don't
recall having to do this on the single Leopard machine that I have
setup.
The Xcode 3.0 tools which contain WO 5.4 no longer
On 10.01.2008, at 11:18, Chuck Hill wrote:
Is that there by default after a successful WO install?
No, it is unfortunately not installed by default on 10.5 client.
I don't recall having to do this on the single Leopard machine that
I have setup.
Yeah, I hope that's fixed in 5.4.1 - I
That looks like a bug, the EC should either not be calling
awakeFromInsertion() or should be seeing the notifications from the
change in value. It makes sense to me for it to call
awakeFromInsertion() *BUT* this results in an object state different
from what was there before the changes
* I think actually Anjo's layout, but it was originally created for
Project Wonder and that is that I keep calling it. The default
layout in WOLips follows Anjo's work, but does not include Project
Wonder.
You need a new name that doesn't scare people ... Both Anjo and
Project Wonder are
On Jan 10, 2008, at 11:04 AM, Mike Schrag wrote:
* I think actually Anjo's layout, but it was originally created
for Project Wonder and that is that I keep calling it. The
default layout in WOLips follows Anjo's work, but does not include
Project Wonder.
You need a new name that doesn't
Now that it is the default, how about New WOLips Layout. Or just
Bambi.
Fine ... Go with WOLips Layout ... I, for one, will continue to call
it the Bambi Layout.
ms
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev
Bug report please this needs to be fixed.
Pierre
--
Pierre Frisch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Jan 10, 2008, at 11:04, Chuck Hill wrote:
That looks like a bug, the EC should either not be calling
awakeFromInsertion() or should be seeing the notifications from the
change in value. It makes sense
You of course know that you could save yourself a lot of grief by
using MacOSX Server where everything is installed and tested by
default... It is only $499.
Pierre
--
Pierre Frisch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Jan 10, 2008, at 10:58, Guido Neitzer wrote:
On 10.01.2008, at 11:18, Chuck Hill
I will let Peter file the report. But while you are waiting...
What do you think is the correct behavior here? Should it not call
awakeFromInsertion again? Should it call it and undo any changes?
Should it call it and detect that the object has been updated?
Calling revert() should, I
Error: java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
You need to get the full exception from the log -- InvocationTarget is
a catch-all.
ms
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list
On 10.01.2008, at 12:34, Mr. Pierre Frisch wrote:
You of course know that you could save yourself a lot of grief by
using MacOSX Server where everything is installed and tested by
default... It is only $499.
I should buy Mac OS X Server for my development box? Not that I think
it's
Am 10.01.2008 um 20:08 schrieb Chuck Hill:
You need a new name that doesn't scare people ... Both Anjo and
Project Wonder are scary to people.
I've met Anjo. They've got reason. :-P
WTF?? I'll kill you! I'll have your snipped for dinner!!
Chuck, just because I saved your ass by scaring
Thanks, my bad.. I haven't set up postgresql to
automatically restart
I have an image (logo) and I used eclipse to install
the webobjects app. It put it at:
/Library/WebObjects/Applications/app/Contents/WebServerResources
however my logo is missing from my web page. Is there
something more I
the webobjects app. It put it at:
/Library/WebObjects/Applications/app/Contents/WebServerResources
however my logo is missing from my web page. Is there
something more I need to do?
Yes, you need to setup the split install .. Create /Library/WebServer/
Documents/WebObjects/yourapp/Contents and
Don't forget the survey :-) And send it to your WO co-workers too,
more answers = better statistics and better view of the community.
De : Pascal Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date : 2 janvier 2008 09:58:36 HNE
À : WebObjects (Group) webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com
Objet : [Announce] Training
I am not entirely sure of what the behavior should be but after the
save the object is in the DB so this not a newly inserted object
anymore. We do a deleteObject() and a revert() logically we should
call awakeFromFetch() as this would have reverted the object to its
fetched state (last
On Jan 10, 2008, at 12:37 PM, Mr. Pierre Frisch wrote:
This is a difficult issue and I am not sure I have the answer. On
the server WebObjects is installed by default so we include the
startup script and the correct apache configuration. On client most
user do not have WebObjects so we do
Le 08-01-10 à 15:42, Chuck Hill a écrit :
On Jan 10, 2008, at 12:37 PM, Mr. Pierre Frisch wrote:
This is a difficult issue and I am not sure I have the answer. On
the server WebObjects is installed by default so we include the
startup script and the correct apache configuration. On
This is a difficult issue and I am not sure I have the answer. On the
server WebObjects is installed by default so we include the startup
script and the correct apache configuration. On client most user do
not have WebObjects so we do not modify the apache configuration and
we not include
Hi all,
The issue came from the «PB.project» file.
For each request, my application was wasting time in
appendToResponse. Many calls was made to
_IDEProjectPB.extractResourcesFromPath()... I don't know exactly
why?!?
The solution I found :
- Uncheck Write PB.project on build in
Hi Pierre,
Could you please make a little extra installer for that. It should be
fairly easy to do; only take a couple of hours.
You could call it WebObjectsClientDeployment.pkg
With Kind Regards,
Dennis Gaastra, M.B.A.[sfu.ca], B.Sc.[ubc.ca]
Chief Technology Officer,
WEBAPPZ Systems,
I don't know why WOLips try to use this file in execution, but this
seem to be the problem for one of my project.
This is WebObjects rapid-turnaround in action, and WO's
implementations is TEIBLE. It generates enormous numbers of calls
to your app. WOLips' implementation of this
On 10.01.2008, at 13:37, Mr. Pierre Frisch wrote:
This is a difficult issue and I am not sure I have the answer. On
the server WebObjects is installed by default so we include the
startup script and the correct apache configuration. On client most
user do not have WebObjects so we do not
On 10.01.2008, at 13:11, Mike Schrag wrote:
Yes, you need to setup the split install .. Create /Library/
WebServer/Documents/WebObjects/yourapp/Contents and then symlink the
WebServerResources from the Applications folder into that folder.
Apache is expecting WebServerResources to be off
On 08/01/2008, at 2:36 AM, Mike Schrag wrote:
NSArrayMyEO = ec.objectsWithFetchSpecification(spec, MyEO.class)
I think generic EOFS would be better ... Passing in Class objects
to fulfill generics always feels a bit like hackery. It's really
cheating -- you're basically casting without
If you are brave enough to install leopard then you probably have
podcast producer somewhere on your machine.
But i'd stick to contributing to the mailing list. It's so much
easier :-)
Simon
On 10 Jan 2008, at 23:54, Chuck Hill wrote:
So, uh, how do you make a podcast?
From: Art Isbell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Jan 9, 2008, at 1:24 PM, Baiss Eric Magnusson wrote:
Jumping in, since I have been unsuccessful with my Leopard server
for 6 weeks now, I have no statement in my httpd.conf:
ScriptAliasMatch ^/cgi-bin/((?!(?i:webobjects)).*$) /Library/
looks like it's been a while since
i've read any wo tutorials :)
Chuck Hill wrote:
That looks like a bug, the EC should either not be calling
awakeFromInsertion() or should be seeing the notifications from the
change in value. It makes sense to me for it to call
awakeFromInsertion() *BUT*
Hi Pierre,
ID: 5682544
Thanks
Peter
Mr. Pierre Frisch wrote:
Bug report please this needs to be fixed.
Pierre
--
Pierre Frisch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Jan 10, 2008, at 11:04, Chuck Hill wrote:
That looks like a bug, the EC should either
not be calling
Actually, using Podcast Producer is really easy to us. The problem
is that you need the server part.
If you are brave enough to install leopard then you probably have
podcast producer somewhere on your machine.
But i'd stick to contributing to the mailing list. It's so much
easier
That might be from some iServices code that I inherited. I'd always
wondered why they did that. However, looking at the rest of the
code, they might just have been confused. :-)
Chuck
On Jan 10, 2008, at 4:13 PM, Peter Vandoros wrote:
looks like it's been a while since i've read any wo
LOL :-)
Chuck Hill wrote:
That might be from some iServices code that I inherited.
I'd always wondered why they did that. However, looking at the rest of
the code, they might just have been confused. :-)
Chuck
On Jan 10, 2008, at 4:13 PM, Peter Vandoros wrote:
looks like
How in the heck to you guys keep track of all that stuff? For a part
time deployer like me I'd be lost with the help...
Anyway, now with Direct Connect disabled and WOPort set to -1, or not
set at all, I get the following error in my browser:
Forbidden
You don't have permission to access
On Jan 10, 2008, at 5:01 PM, Jeff Schmitz wrote:
How in the heck to you guys keep track of all that stuff?
We're just smart, real smart. :-P
For a part time deployer like me I'd be lost with the help...
Anyway, now with Direct Connect disabled and WOPort set to -1, or
not set at all,
On Jan 10, 2008, at 3:01 PM, Jeff Schmitz wrote:
Anyway, now with Direct Connect disabled and WOPort set to -1, or
not set at all, I get the following error in my browser:
Forbidden
You don't have permission to access /cgi-bin/WebObjects/
netBrackets.woa/-49882 on this server.
This
BINGO!!!
It now works with Direct Connect disabled. Now, to figure out what's
wrong with my cookie.
Thanks to all,
Jeff
On Jan 10, 2008, at 7:35 PM, Art Isbell wrote:
On Jan 10, 2008, at 3:01 PM, Jeff Schmitz wrote:
Anyway, now with Direct Connect disabled and WOPort set to -1, or
not
On Jan 10, 2008, at 5:49 PM, Jeff Schmitz wrote:
BINGO!!!
It now works with Direct Connect disabled.
See, I told you it was easy! :-P
Now, to figure out what's wrong with my cookie.
Oh yeah, that is how we got into this mess.
Chuck
On Jan 10, 2008, at 7:35 PM, Art Isbell wrote:
Hello;
I'm a bit curious to know why this has been deprecated? Anybody know?
cheers.
___
Andrew Lindesay
technology : www.lindesay.co.nz
business : www.silvereye.co.nz
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
I've used a bunch of programs for making podcasts, for screen
captures with audio you could try Snapz Pro X and Quicktime Pro
will export anything to a podcast. There's also ProfCast for
Powerpoint/Keynote presentations with audio.
The mailing list is great but it's not the same as a
On 10.01.2008, at 18:01, Jeff Schmitz wrote:
You don't have permission to access /cgi-bin/WebObjects/
netBrackets.woa/-49882 on this server.
Apache setup.
Check in your httpd.conf that you have it set to:
Directory /
Options FollowSymLinks
AllowOverride None
# Order
On 10/01/2008, at 12:49 PM, Mr. Pierre Frisch wrote:
Absolutely. I would recommend that you make a diff of the two
projects if you do not want to use Apple's one. To my knowledge the
current WO 5.4 adaptor is a super set of the both the Wonder and the
WO 5.3 ones. If we miss something
Never mind. I had broken something somewhere.. a fresh copy of the
source fixed my problem.
On 11/01/2008, at 12:04 PM, Q wrote:
On 10/01/2008, at 12:49 PM, Mr. Pierre Frisch wrote:
Absolutely. I would recommend that you make a diff of the two
projects if you do not want to use Apple's
It's dynamically generated as part of the Adaptor build. See the
makefile in the Adaptor directory. What kind of error are you getting
in the console (more detail)? I don't see this problem on my system.
On Jan 10, 2008, at 6:04 PM, Q wrote:
On 10/01/2008, at 12:49 PM, Mr. Pierre
On Jan 10, 2008, at 6:02 PM, Guido Neitzer wrote:
On 10.01.2008, at 18:15, Chuck Hill wrote:
How in the heck to you guys keep track of all that stuff?
We're just smart, real smart. :-P
Maybe you are ... I have Yojimbo and my own notes ... ;-)
Well, that's smart, ain't it?
--
Hi,
I added a new podcast who explain a bit of the UI of WOLips and
Eclipse. And you can now subscribe to the podcasts with iTunes!
You can find the feed by the iTunes Store (do a search of
WebObjects) or you can subscribe manually with:
On 10.01.2008, at 19:17, Chuck Hill wrote:
Maybe you are ... I have Yojimbo and my own notes ... ;-)
Well, that's smart, ain't it?
;-)
cug
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list
On Jan 10, 2008, at 5:10 PM, Xia, Wen wrote:
When I tried to use the XMLSerializer.java in my project, I keep
getting the error:
A fatal exception occurred: null
[2008-01-10 16:56:17 PST] main java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError
at XMLSerializer.serializeArray(XMLSerializer.java:24)
On Jan 10, 2008, at 12:31 PM, Mr. Pierre Frisch wrote:
I am not entirely sure of what the behavior should be but after the
save the object is in the DB so this not a newly inserted object
anymore.
That is a good point. I'd guess if this is not a simple bug, that
someone was looking as
The session ID key is now configurable in the Application, so you
replace the string wosid by anything you like.
You should call WOApplication.application().sessionIdKey(); and of
course you override it if you like.
Pierre
--
Pierre Frisch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Jan 10, 2008, at 17:55,
--
Pierre Frisch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Jan 10, 2008, at 18:37, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Jan 10, 2008, at 12:31 PM, Mr. Pierre Frisch wrote:
I am not entirely sure of what the behavior should be but after the
save the object is in the DB so this not a newly inserted object
anymore.
That is
Hi Chuck,
I am answering my own post.
I think the correct behavior is to call awakeFromInsertion() if we
have an object with EOTemporaryGlobalID and awakeFromFetch() if we
have a regular EOGlobalID.
Pierre
--
Pierre Frisch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Jan 10, 2008, at 19:33, Mr. Pierre Frisch
Mr. Pierre Frisch wrote:
--
Pierre Frisch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Jan 10, 2008, at 18:37, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Jan 10, 2008, at 12:31 PM, Mr. Pierre
Frisch wrote:
I am not entirely sure of what the behavior
should be but after the save the object is in the
On Jan 10, 2008, at 8:04 PM, Mr. Pierre Frisch wrote:
Hi Chuck,
I am answering my own post.
:-)
I think the correct behavior is to call awakeFromInsertion() if we
have an object with EOTemporaryGlobalID and awakeFromFetch() if we
have a regular EOGlobalID.
I am not sure if either
Am 11.01.2008 um 01:13 schrieb Peter Vandoros:
It makes sense to me for it to call awakeFromInsertion() *BUT* this
results in an object state different from what was there before the
changes being reverted. That seems to be a very wrong result.
Which is why in (yawn) Wonder's
Hi All,
I just upgraded from Tiger client to Leopard and I've noticed two
issues.
First, the Eclipse Console correctly reports the time zone as PST,
but the actual time digits are GMT. Am I missing something? I'm
running Eclipse 3.3.1.1 and WOLips 3.3.4574.
Second, I keep getting An
I may need to buy another server and get it up and running quickly and
was hoping for some advice. I currently have the previous generation
xserve running with Tiger Server and am developing on Leopard Client
with webobjects 5.3, and DirectConnect/Apache problems
notwithstanding, things
I don't see the advantage
Pierre
--
Pierre Frisch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Jan 10, 2008, at 22:00, Anjo Krank wrote:
Am 11.01.2008 um 01:13 schrieb Peter Vandoros:
It makes sense to me for it to call awakeFromInsertion() *BUT*
this results in an object state different from what was there
Hi,
I got it to work with the following patch. It was the least obtrusive
patch I could find but I do not know if it's along the Ajax/Wonder
integration philosophy.
### Eclipse Workspace Patch 1.0
#P AjaxExample
Index: Sources/AjaxGridExampleNavBar.java
72 matches
Mail list logo
